Laowa 10mm f/2.8 ZERO-D for FULL FRAME cameras - how good is it for astrophotography?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 27

  • @kamilkp
    @kamilkp  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    CORRECTION: The lens hood actually IS detachable - but it just takes way more torque than I expected to take it off.
    ► GET THE LENS HERE: www.venuslens.net/product/laowa-10mm-f-2-8-ff-zero-d/ref/1233/

  • @alandyer910
    @alandyer910 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thank you for the review. I have the Laowa 10mm in the auto focus version for Nikon Z mount. In Lightroom and Camera Raw there is a lens profile for the 10mm that was selected automatically, since there are contacts to communicate with the camera. But the lens was listed under Nikon lenses, odd. And while the profile correction fixed most of the vignetting I find I still have to dial in more correction manually. But it is a great lens for auroras. Cheers!

  • @ssbhide123
    @ssbhide123 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Having the core of MW and Andromeda galaxy in the same FOV is insane!

    • @bhastro9959
      @bhastro9959 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Other, cheaper, wider fisheye lenses allow this.

  • @egoceanic
    @egoceanic 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you for the video. Just got the lens and learning a lot from you for lightroom

  • @fieldt7881
    @fieldt7881 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hope your parrot is no longer alone. It's kind of an animal that needs at least one friend

  • @BenGieCruz
    @BenGieCruz 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    That’s a nice integration on the background! How many hours does it have?

    • @kamilkp
      @kamilkp  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You mean the cygnus loop shot? Around 10h I think

  • @standfest_party
    @standfest_party 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Many thanks for the review. I'm considering replacing my Laowa 9mm F5.6 FF RL, which is great but is slow. I miss the brighter aperture for the Aurora.
    Kamil, how do you explain that in Albert Dros's review, the lens has a much worse performance on the corners, where stars are distorted and look like lines? Do you think this might be due to improper focusing?

    • @kamilkp
      @kamilkp  3 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Hard to say but sometimes if the quality control in the factory is not the best we might end up with good and bad copies of the lens. Maybe he got a bad copy?

  • @clissonplage
    @clissonplage 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    thanks for sharing
    i see there is also the 12mm f/2.8 Zero-D for RF mount
    what do you think? It would have a little less distortion no?
    on the other hand in exposure time, it falls to 41seconds instead of 50
    any opinion?
    Thanks

    • @kamilkp
      @kamilkp  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I think i’d go with the 10mm. It is pretty impressive to have the widest f/2.8 rectilinear lens that exists at your disposal

    • @clissonplage
      @clissonplage 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@kamilkp thanks

  • @LiKui_ak
    @LiKui_ak หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hello! Tell me what to do if I have a Canon R camera and I need a wide-angle fixed lens with autofocus. Is there really no lens that matches my request? Because I really liked this Laowa 10mm lens, but it doesn't have autofocus...

    • @kamilkp
      @kamilkp  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Do you wanna shoot portraits with it?

    • @LiKui_ak
      @LiKui_ak หลายเดือนก่อน

      @kamilkp I would like to photograph people in interesting locations, for this I want a wide-angle lens so that as much as possible fits into the picture :)

  • @rockymanilow5115
    @rockymanilow5115 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Fun to play with it

  • @kalef1234
    @kalef1234 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Been eyeing the TT Artisan 11MM F/2.8. it costs like $215 and performs well for that price

    • @brookscurran
      @brookscurran 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      that lens is a fisheye tho?

    • @kalef1234
      @kalef1234 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@brookscurran it's rectilinear I think. B&H review photos look pretty nice for $215

    • @brookscurran
      @brookscurran 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@kalef1234 "Offering a uniquely wide angle of view, the TTArtisan 11mm f/2.8 is a fisheye lens" that's what i'm seeing for $215

    • @kamilkp
      @kamilkp  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @brookscurran exactly. I do have it too and I like it for bts timelapses and stuff but it is a fish whereas the Laowa is not

    • @drsuarezneuro
      @drsuarezneuro 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Fisheye Lens is hard to correct distortion

  • @AR-vf7vg
    @AR-vf7vg 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Some more reasons to take the Laowa MF 9mm f/5.6 instead (and soon much wider).
    ..No way; You don't know about that ???

    • @brookscurran
      @brookscurran 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      2.8 > 5.6 for astrophotography...

    • @AR-vf7vg
      @AR-vf7vg 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@brookscurran Ok. It's true I don't ever do astro and don't know that field of requirements.