Daniel Dennett: Breaking the Spell - Religion as a Natural Phenomenon

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 420

  • @spartansEXTEEL
    @spartansEXTEEL 11 ปีที่แล้ว +56

    A real Living Philosopher, I Have seen him Lecture in person twice and it was completely exhilarating!

  • @Rico-Suave_
    @Rico-Suave_ 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    I loved Dr. Daniel Dennett, very sad to hear about his passing, I've would have loved to meet him, he was my absolute favorite, an intellectual giant, a legend, true sage, heard he was also very kind gentle person, huge loss to civilization, I will watch tons of his lectures in the next few days/weeks in his memory, I was distraught to know that my favorite philosopher/intellectual passed away, got some consolation that his lectures will be online and I can watch them over and over again 57:16

  • @snakecunningham2895
    @snakecunningham2895 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    Rest in power, Danny Dennett, master of irony. He made the best Santa Claus at the infamous Tufts Christmas parties.

    • @willmpet
      @willmpet 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Though he is gone, We are still able to listen to his wisdom!

  • @woodygilson3465
    @woodygilson3465 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Only twelve minutes in and mind blown. How have I missed this? I've watched a lot of his lectures and interviews, but never heard him talk about religion's parallels to selective breeding. Hadn't heard _anyone_ draw that parallel. Fascinating!

  • @Vitusvonatzinger
    @Vitusvonatzinger 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    He’s the best lecturer in modern history; having access to his presentations has changed my life.

    • @Vitusvonatzinger
      @Vitusvonatzinger 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@SammyxSweetheart.02 blame the 13th century artist.

    • @squarerootof2
      @squarerootof2 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah I agree, having internet access can have life-changing effects on some people.

    • @jamesvagnoni1609
      @jamesvagnoni1609 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Vitusvonatzinger 0

  • @Liltyrone7
    @Liltyrone7 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +40

    RIP Daniel Dennett

    • @ghostinthemachine8243
      @ghostinthemachine8243 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Doctor Dennett. You now have all the answers. Pleasant Journey Daniel

    • @tahirrazzaq9494
      @tahirrazzaq9494 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@ghostinthemachine8243wait no way. He just passed away? I just discovered him 2 months ago. Damn. RIP Mr. Dennett

    • @matthewstokes1608
      @matthewstokes1608 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@tahirrazzaq9494he doesn’t believe in a f-ing afterlife! There’s no “rest” and there’s no “peace” in nothingness… how hypocritical can you get??

    • @matthewstokes1608
      @matthewstokes1608 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ghostinthemachine8243
      He has NO answers if his lifelong theoretical prattle was true!
      Don’t be such a hypocrite - he’s gone to total nothingness… He now understands nothing at all.
      It’s a nice future you’ve fallen for, isn’t it? Ignorance and pointless extinction after suffering… Wake up!

    • @jimwaters304
      @jimwaters304 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He and others like him that passed on will be missed.

  • @venkataponnaganti
    @venkataponnaganti 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    This talk made me understand the religious process very much. Thank you, Dennet

    • @jamesbarlow6423
      @jamesbarlow6423 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      😅

    • @Spiritisnobody86
      @Spiritisnobody86 ปีที่แล้ว

      The mind distorts reality in such a way that the atheist denies the spirit and the believer feels the spirit separated from himself. Then neither of them can perceive the truth in its entirety. The atheist is still just another believer, he believe in science instead of the spirit and the believer needs to pray to a God that he believes is separate from himself for his salvation, for his security, for his comfort... But none of them, neither a believer or the atheist, know how to truly listen without leaving aside their beliefs.
      Atheists deny themselves as they are and believers separate themselves by praying to an external God invented by them they believe is superior.

  • @JosephStern
    @JosephStern 11 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    To me this was Dennett's best delivery of this particular talk. Thanks for uploading.

  • @JosephHeavey
    @JosephHeavey 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I was present at one of his lectures in London at the RSA, and received an autographed copy of his latest book.
    Truly a great man and an inspiration, as opposed to the dregs we see operating in the American political system

  • @nearthgg
    @nearthgg ปีที่แล้ว +1

    excellent lecture. Dr. Dennett is a great orator!

  • @AskForTruth
    @AskForTruth ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing this was 14 years ago. We are going through a transformation and dogma of the religions of the world have been exposed for what they are, lies and methods of controlling people, reducing people and turning one against another. In the future I hope to see people becoming more spiritual and coming together in their love and respect for each other, and uplift those around them.

  • @scienceexplains302
    @scienceexplains302 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    *-10%- 43% human cells*
    The 10% figure is from an older, faulty study.
    But very informative and helpful speech.
    Daniel Dennett has made wonderful contributions to philosophy

  • @JJ-qo7th
    @JJ-qo7th 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Flipping a coin is a fantastic way to decide what you want between two options. First, assign a face to each option. Second, flip your coin. Third, ignore what the coin says and go with what your gut said while the coin was in the air. In those short moments between the coin being flipped and caught, you got a hunch about which face you wanted to appear.

    • @stevenwheeler4198
      @stevenwheeler4198 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      As Piet Hein put it:
      Whenever you're called on to make up your mind,
      and you're hampered by not having any,
      the best way to solve the dilemma, you'll find,
      is simply by spinning a penny.
      No - not so that chance shall decide the affair
      while you're passively standing there moping;
      but the moment the penny is up in the air,
      you suddenly know what you're hoping

    • @chrisgreen1514
      @chrisgreen1514 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I used to do this when I was younger. However, I’d wait until the coin landed and I could notice if I was slightly pleased or not with this the random outcome. If I was displeased I’d just change my mind!
      It assisted me by involving my gut feelings (intuition) in the rational process I guess.

  • @MAXKENT-mh7lu
    @MAXKENT-mh7lu 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Daniel Dennett is the best theologian

  • @SuperWetRat
    @SuperWetRat 12 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I LOVE Dennett's dad jokes :) they are my favourite thing about his lectures

  • @MattiasJohnson
    @MattiasJohnson 11 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    This changes my whole way of looking at religion, truly amazing work

    • @loveandfaithfulness4479
      @loveandfaithfulness4479 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      We are not a random occurrence, but an intended creation of our God.
      There is more to us than not just atoms; We are not just some brain chemistry, producing sound out of our mouth. Let us admit that we exist. Everything that we have in this life will one day come to an end... our body will return to dust after death. and our spirit returns to the true God who gave it; any hope of future life for that person now rests entirely with God. According to the Bible, in John 17:3, the meaning of life is to know Jesus Christ. And this is eternal life, that they know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom you have sent. Let us place our faith in God alone so that we would be strong in the Lord and ready to battle against the doubts planted by the enemy. Lord, increase our Faith!

    • @zoeyraesdad25
      @zoeyraesdad25 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@loveandfaithfulness4479 prove it.

    • @manwoninchrist1495
      @manwoninchrist1495 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      You need to read more Scriptures. Else you easley sway by every wind of doctrines and philosophies that comes to mold you think away from your creator. God look in scripture and get to know God for your self and not on mankind or his denominations.

    • @zoeyraesdad25
      @zoeyraesdad25 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@manwoninchrist1495 I usually don’t trust the opinion’s of people who can barely read and write, but you’ve made such a compelling case, it would be hard to disagree.

    • @manwoninchrist1495
      @manwoninchrist1495 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@zoeyraesdad25 thanks. I'm glad I encountered you at a more mature level of understanding where you can tolerate grammatical weakness. We all have weaknesses. But more so I'm glad you have gotten my point. PEACE 😊👍🏽

  • @longcastle4863
    @longcastle4863 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I used to think religion was just going to fade out. Long after I’m dead, but oh well.. I see now we have to understand it out of existence. I hope the scholars and researchers take up this project suggested by Dennett

    • @garybowler5946
      @garybowler5946 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I noticed how his ideas can also explain cults, politics and advertising.

    • @matthewstokes1608
      @matthewstokes1608 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Impossible

  • @shadysaeed644
    @shadysaeed644 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This lecture needs to come back to the light 😎

    • @1lightheaded
      @1lightheaded 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      There is one light though the lamps are many

  • @PlanetBongoSan
    @PlanetBongoSan 14 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    dry-ass intro ends at 2.20

    • @davideldred.campingwilder6481
      @davideldred.campingwilder6481 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      great info

    • @mism847
      @mism847 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      2:20

    • @ronaldlogan3525
      @ronaldlogan3525 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      that is 2:20 of my life I will never get back

    • @matthewstokes1608
      @matthewstokes1608 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ronaldlogan3525if you’re such an atheist you won’t get any of it “back” soon enough.
      Only Christ is real…

    • @ronaldlogan3525
      @ronaldlogan3525 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@matthewstokes1608 Interesting how you assume so much.

  • @JosephStern
    @JosephStern 11 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I'm sure you understood this, but what he meant by "folk" was "primitive" or "aboriginal". He meant little songs and melodies that tend to be found in cultures that have not yet discovered the formal principles of musical composition, the diatonic scale, modes, chords, and all the paraphernalia of modern music writing (of the kind that Woodie Guthrie relied upon in composing his music). That's the "wild ancestor" of our "domesticated" musical forms. Anyway, cheers.

  • @michaelcollins7192
    @michaelcollins7192 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Fascinating and brilliant speaker.

  • @TheEarthcubed
    @TheEarthcubed 5 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Is there a second part to this? It seems to cut off at the end...

  • @CamanoRick
    @CamanoRick ปีที่แล้ว

    Such a brilliant presentation.

  • @oscarmudd6579
    @oscarmudd6579 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Religion is a natural phenomenon in exactly the same way as crime is a natural phenomenon. Living a better life than everyone else at the crippling expense of everyone else. We don't accept one; why do we accept the other?

  • @sandbar3000
    @sandbar3000 11 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I like how you put that religion just "knows" and is arrogant. It sure does seem like that to me. I have a copy of The Self Gene" here. I'm renting it now. I think I have 4 or 6 more weeks before it is due. I read all of 8 pages of his book the last time I rented it and feel in love with his book. I'm reading another book now called "Mindsight" by Daniel Siegel . . .he is a neurocientist. I love learning about the brain.

  • @d7samurai
    @d7samurai 11 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    this lecture is based on his book of the same name ("breaking the spell: religion as a natural phenomenon"). for memes and memetics, first read richard dawkins' "the selfish gene" (where the term was originally introduced, invented by dawkins) - and perhaps "the meme machine" by susan blackmore. another dennett book you might like is "darwin's dangerous idea".

  • @h3nrasouli
    @h3nrasouli 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The best thing in this temporary universe is that nothing is best!

  • @sandbar3000
    @sandbar3000 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It gets really good at 35 minutes of how a meme is born. . . anyone know if a book of Daniel Dannett on this topic of what the purpose of religion. I'm more of a book person than siting and listening to a video for an hour. . .thankx. . .

  • @happiness393
    @happiness393 14 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Very interesting and informative talk.

  • @ashleylovesdaddy
    @ashleylovesdaddy 14 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Good Evening. You're all very welcome!
    I love the Brits.

  • @misszombiekate
    @misszombiekate 14 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i can say that this was very interesting and it really does make a lot of sense. i want to see the whole thing!

  • @walkaboutwoods
    @walkaboutwoods 10 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I think the biological metaphors that Dennett employs are quite accurate. The emergence of a religious meme is a self-propagating entity around which a culture begins to organically define itself. It does not mean that this meme has any basis in fact. His metaphor of the dog looking up and growling in an assumption that a "who" has caused something to happen is correct. It is analogous to asking "who" caused someone to be killed by lightening. In the absence of the scientific method, the drive to explain natural phenomena has often been ascribed to "who" and the repetition of this "who" answer becomes a meme that self-propagates into the realm of religion. This meme, though false, then begins to explain other aspects of the natural world to its acolytes and they build upon it by explaining other aspects of the natural world by the same process. The meme is thus fortified and becomes the accepted doctrine of a people. It gives them peace because they believe these natural phenomena happen for a reason. It gives cohesion to a group and thus fortifies them. But, it does not make the meme true. All memes are like viruses in the way they propagate. Dennett is presenting his own ideas in his lecture and they, courtesy of TH-cam, are propagating to become memes that will either flourish or go extinct. The only difference is that religious memes are based on "who caused something to happen" as opposed to the more modern rationale of asking "what is happening and how is it happening" as opposed to looking for an agent. I find his argument compelling and potentially right on the money.

    • @1namrog
      @1namrog 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      If a meme is imaginary and "has[n't] any basis in fact," then I'd say it explains less than you suggest. If memes are admittedly "false," as you say, why call it an entity, ie existing independently? Even if the ideas "to become memes" were understood to be true it wouldn't follow that they're entities independent of the human mind. So there's less empirical data for memes than there is for real but extraordinary entities that some people encounter. The experience is a fact that the causal reasoning or explanation values more or less. Its power in context is what really matters, whatever the cause may be.

  • @extropian314
    @extropian314 12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Well fortunately, an idea's ability to solve problems is not affected by the complete personality it originated in.
    That said, I think Dennett has immense appreciation for beauty and preciousness of life, consciousness, nature, human relationships.
    *That* said now, who cares? Let's appreciate personalities as they come, interested in all sorts of things.

  • @krissthesexyatheist
    @krissthesexyatheist 14 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Love his books, never seen him on video. Now I know what he looks like.

  • @B4IRUTUARU16
    @B4IRUTUARU16 14 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    thank you for uploading

  • @sandbar3000
    @sandbar3000 11 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Oh, I love this guy when he says "nobody knows which one is right, I don't know". So very humble and not asking like a dumb ass saying something other Christians would say like "I know I'm going to heaven, why? The buybull tells me so". When a person says he doesn't know the answer to something like this -it shows maturity. I think DD is my new "hero".

  • @MymilanitalyBlogspot
    @MymilanitalyBlogspot 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Only eleven years ago, he stated that after beginning as a Christian Church, then being transformed into an Islamic mosque, Hagia Sophia had eventually become a museum. Unfortunately, it has recently been turned back into a mosque, so adopting it as an example is still valid, but he'll have to place it into another category..

    • @Paine137
      @Paine137 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hence evolution.

  • @SapienSafari
    @SapienSafari 5 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    When Dennett talked about “Jesus Christ, God’s Chosen King” it sounded so mythical.

    • @loveandfaithfulness4479
      @loveandfaithfulness4479 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      We are not a random occurrence, but an intended creation of our God.
      There is more to us than not just atoms; We are not just some brain chemistry, producing sound out of our mouth. Let us admit that we exist. Everything that we have in this life will one day come to an end... our body will return to dust after death. and our spirit returns to the true God who gave it; any hope of future life for that person now rests entirely with God. According to the Bible, in John 17:3, the meaning of life is to know Jesus Christ. And this is eternal life, that they know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom you have sent. Let us place our faith in God alone so that we would be strong in the Lord and ready to battle against the doubts planted by the enemy. Lord, increase our Faith!

    • @asherloat8570
      @asherloat8570 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@loveandfaithfulness4479 You again?

    • @mism847
      @mism847 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@loveandfaithfulness4479 Delusion

    • @loveandfaithfulness4479
      @loveandfaithfulness4479 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Jeheff Hhinkkle
      I Could Place hundreds of Quotations that clearly prove that there is a God in heaven, But as God has stated His handy work is seen in His creation, Unless you repent of your unbelief and sin, you will refuse to accept the eternal God’s eyewitness testimony concerning Himself and His creative work in the Word of God. Jesus is the one who reveals the Father to us. If we want to know what the Father is like, all we have to do is look at Jesus. Its not something that you can explain with arguments. Its a gift, its a revelation a person receives when he/she decides to pursue the truth. Faith is a deeply personal thing that only God and you are privy to. Faith only makes sense to the one who hears it. Jesus told Nicodemus that someone only born of flesh possesses merely physical life; but there is a different type of life - the eternal life that God Himself possesses! To possess this spiritual life requires being born again.
      John 7:17
      "If anyone’s will is to do God’s will, he will know whether the teaching is from God or whether I am speaking on my own authority."

    • @adamburling9551
      @adamburling9551 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@loveandfaithfulness4479 It's obvious human beings are agents. And agents do not come forth out of such ideas as Darwinism i.e... A Godless and meaningless means of coming about, or existence.
      Therefore Its easier for him to say that this is all just a phenomenon. Lol. That's phenomenonal in itself that statement.

  • @Rico-Suave_
    @Rico-Suave_ 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great lecture, Watched all of it

  • @ultimate0levels
    @ultimate0levels ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent lecture

  • @tenemanuheketa3483
    @tenemanuheketa3483 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    words are the vehicle of thought..which is why the saying goes THINK BEFORE YOU SPEAK but realize thoughts are emotions so kia tupato!

  • @chrisgreen1514
    @chrisgreen1514 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Interesting perception. Ironically Dan’s ideas seem to clarify and confirm the idea that, for many Christian’s today, Jesus is alive and lives within them, and they are indeed the body of Christ. It also makes far more sense of the Lord’s prayer “Thy Kingdom come thy will be done on Earth as in heaven “. Nice one Dan. RIP

  • @EsenHanIm
    @EsenHanIm 14 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    16:05-54: HOLY COW!!! Flying Sphagetti Monster, you are GLORIOUS!

  • @flowplan925
    @flowplan925 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you Flow

  • @normandguevara1530
    @normandguevara1530 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Rest in peace Daniel Dennett i learneð so much from you

  • @splatted6201
    @splatted6201 8 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    34:00 or thereabouts is the central nugget in this talk.

    • @khemirimonem6001
      @khemirimonem6001 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      it's where bullshit starts , does the existence of an "agent detection instinct " implies a non-existence of this agent , this agent must exist , it's a reasonable and intelligent instinct .

    • @splatted6201
      @splatted6201 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@khemirimonem6001 How much of the video did you actually watch from that point? Because his argument there is more that an account of religion under the hypothesis of naturalism is plausible, rather that your religion of choice is implausible. There may well be arguments for that, but they are separate from the particular point that he is trying to make, here.

    • @khemirimonem6001
      @khemirimonem6001 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@splatted6201 I watched the whole video , i think he did well in describing some "brilliant " biological behaviors with a remarkable excessive
      use of the word "design" , as for his own interpretations and theory ,it's a fiasco.

    • @splatted6201
      @splatted6201 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@khemirimonem6001 _"I think he did well in describing some "brilliant " biological behaviors"_
      That , in the case of the hyperactive agency detection mechanism, are error-prone, and do not always lead to accurate conclusions, especially when used without careful reasoning and comprehensive examination of the relevant evidence.
      _"with a remarkable excessive use of the word "design"_
      _Your_ opinion, and one focused on surface rhetoric rather than the logical content of his argument. Which, as I have pointed out already, you've failed to accurately grasp. Given that you haven't rebutted my criticism, there, and are shifting to a critique of surface rhetoric, it seems that you do not in fact have a coherent counterargument to Dennett and apparently didn't even understand him on the point that you attempted to criticize.
      _"as for his own interpretations and theory ,it's a fiasco."_
      If you've watched the entire video, then it's likely that you've not understood it well, and have no good reason for dismissing his argument as a 'fiasco'.

    • @JJ-qo7th
      @JJ-qo7th 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you for the timestamp. This is what I came to this video for.

  • @kapkarakoyun
    @kapkarakoyun 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Rest in peace Daniel

  • @RonJohn63
    @RonJohn63 9 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Thumbs down because the lecture seems to be cut short.

  • @SacredSocietyAP
    @SacredSocietyAP 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    You should never enter a debate unless both people are willing to learn something.

  • @youbechannel369
    @youbechannel369 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thank you soo much
    RIP 🙏

  • @CazBarry
    @CazBarry 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I love the irony here, of thinking of Religion as an evolving set of self replicating ideas. I have to recommend this scheme to Ray Comfort, Wendy Wyatt, Pat Robinson, Ken Ham and the many vocal Creationists in the USA!

  • @Eric-l7x
    @Eric-l7x 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ‘It’s hot down here!’ -Dennett May 2024

  • @sirushti1132
    @sirushti1132 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    RIP what a great mind.

    • @matthewstokes1608
      @matthewstokes1608 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      “RIP” …?! You hypocrite

    • @sirushti1132
      @sirushti1132 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@matthewstokes1608 I mean it is the traditional condolence. I guess i shouldve said rest in thoughts. But it makes me sound stuck up.

    • @gregbrown3082
      @gregbrown3082 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@matthewstokes1608lol imagine coming to an otherwise peaceful comment section and just leaving hate everywhere.
      Good luck, I guess.

  • @naganokumas
    @naganokumas 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    As a child from Darwin (Northern Territory, Australia, tropics, Santa never made it to Darwin, Cyclone Tracy 1974 Christmas Day, etc).
    I grew up watching the news from 'down south'.
    We'd have to turn the volume up on the TV, because of the monsoonal rain on the roof, whilst we watched stories about the drought, with visions of dry sheep/cow carcassses.
    'Is there a way to send all our 'too much' water to them down there?' was my sentiment.
    It can be engineered.
    Make Australia drought proof.

  • @supercoupe86
    @supercoupe86 3 ปีที่แล้ว +46

    It is very honorable that atheist views of the universe explain things, whilst religion explains nothing

    • @andrewlevy7103
      @andrewlevy7103 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      As a highly religious dumbass I grew up as. I couldn't agree with you more

    • @Dave.Mustaine.Is.Genius
      @Dave.Mustaine.Is.Genius ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Geez... Be real... It's totally vica-versa. Fer an atheist, everything comes down to things moving around reasonlessly and intentionlessly and unconsciously.

    • @mr.mcbeavy1443
      @mr.mcbeavy1443 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Dave.Mustaine.Is.Genius
      That's what makes it so awe inspiring.

    • @Dave.Mustaine.Is.Genius
      @Dave.Mustaine.Is.Genius ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mr.mcbeavy1443 no not really. people still cannot find satisfaction nor great truths in it

    • @Dionysus3883
      @Dionysus3883 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Dave.Mustaine.Is.Genius some people can and do. Others can’t and don’t. Still others likely don’t find satisfaction anywhere.
      Religious answers tell amazing stories from which we can learn a lot about people and places and cultures, but ultimately stories are all they really are. Scientific answers, on the other hand, read like an instruction manual: highly detailed, explanatory, and accurate, but clinical and boring as hell to read.
      It comes down to what kind of explanations satisfy a person. Some people need to be the star of their eternal story that goes on forever. Some people don’t need to go on forever at all, and would view that as a kind of hell, really. People are just generally fundamentally different in this way.

  • @JillFreeman-kb4ih
    @JillFreeman-kb4ih 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    you argue as if there is one set reality and only some things survive to remain alive on a single timeline. this is like thinking that time is uniform rather than relative.

  • @naganokumas
    @naganokumas 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What is gout?
    It's not a symbiont, it's an accumulation of what, exactly?
    You can't put any weight on your foot. And so you can't move. And the pain makes you bivouac across the room.
    And then, a week later, it's 'magically' gone. And then you prance and dance because your feet work again, just like before.
    (Gout sufferers have a special dance of renewed ability, once they get it back, that those that don't suffer it would find a bit weird.)
    What is gout?

  • @ciao-cj5in
    @ciao-cj5in 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    It's pathetic that videos like this one should have 70k views 11 years after posting

    • @brennonguilbeau569
      @brennonguilbeau569 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      People want to be entertained not educated.

    • @kookamunga2458
      @kookamunga2458 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Millennials have very short attention spans so they don't bother watching videos more than a few minutes in length .

  • @momentary_
    @momentary_ 13 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @nerdyharry That's not his job. He's not a motivational speaker. He's a philosopher and his only concern is to try to uncover the truth (without causing any harm.)

  • @DaylightDigital
    @DaylightDigital 13 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    That's one O.G. cuckoo! This is my house lol. All jokes aside Dennett is one of the best on this subject, great upload

  • @Bunqers
    @Bunqers 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The existence of systems and events doesn't rule out God. The absence rather would.

  •  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why does it stop so abruptly????

  • @sander001100
    @sander001100 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    David Hume and Charles Darwin are your heroes. They are also my heroes, but Daniel Dennet is also my hero.

  • @gregbrown3082
    @gregbrown3082 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Where is the rest of the talk?!

  • @extropian314
    @extropian314 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    My pleasure. 'Haha' about the grammar thing :) I do enjoy an easy-to-digest sentence...
    Nice to meet you.

  • @spartansEXTEEL
    @spartansEXTEEL 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Religion a thousand years ago could not and can not teach us what it did not understand at that time.

  • @dariolemos4583
    @dariolemos4583 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It really kicks in at around min 35

  • @andreasandersson9736
    @andreasandersson9736 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Brilliant :)

  • @TupacMakaveli1996
    @TupacMakaveli1996 ปีที่แล้ว

    Aren't there people who think that having more kids is still the highest goal of life?

    • @nearthgg
      @nearthgg ปีที่แล้ว +1

      there are, but not all. In other animals ALL the population want that benefit and in humans it's only partial.

  • @CareFreeWherever
    @CareFreeWherever 12 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    hell yes i'd want my daughter to marry a chelsea fan, daniel

  • @Gitohandro
    @Gitohandro 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    33:15 is where the video really starts

  • @Pincer88
    @Pincer88 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    It's not an attack on religion, it's an attack on ideas regardless. In fact even on the ideas of Dawkins, Plato, etc.

  • @haakoflo
    @haakoflo ปีที่แล้ว

    I wouldn't go so far as to say that religions have been brilliantly designed. They have been intelligently desinged, though, or at least some of them.

  • @jamesbarlow6423
    @jamesbarlow6423 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Julian Jaynes has the best evolutionary explanation for religion. Dennett is speculating by anthropological analogy. ("Search for causal agents" etc. Really?)

  • @ilovgus
    @ilovgus 12 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    this clip seems to finish abruptly, does anyone know if there is a sequense?

  • @ananiasacts
    @ananiasacts 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    I wonder if google could create a map of the human "memeome" by merely analyzing all of the text on the web based on the frequencies of the phrases and idioms that define them. Perhaps it's a proprietary index they can't share. It seems like it would be an interesting thing to browse.

  • @parkerjwill
    @parkerjwill 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If idea is the substance of mental evolution, what drives the idea?

    • @Andre-bk6jp
      @Andre-bk6jp 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The bus driver 'drives' the idea. LOL

    • @purushottamdas2950
      @purushottamdas2950 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Andre-bk6jp LOL hehe…. I made this comment 7 years ago. What is funny?

  • @d7samurai
    @d7samurai 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    where's the rest?

  • @zytigon
    @zytigon 13 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @nerdyharry Listening to orthodox ministers will make you ill. I love hearing the sense & reason from Daniel Dennett, who is one of the cleverest people on earth.For great analysis of the facts about the Bible & other old Writ & comparative religion try also John W. Loftus, Robert M. Price, Dan Barker, Valerie Tarico, Ken Humphreys, Keith Parsons, Ken Pulliam, David Mills, Gary Greenberg, Bart Ehrman, Joseph Wheless, C. Dennis Mckinsey, Richard Carrier, Christopher Hitchens, Richard Dawkins

  • @harry8601
    @harry8601 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Rip legend 💖

  • @AjitPatel53
    @AjitPatel53 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The similarity is not only in religion, to surrender to God and obey the word even if it doesn't make sense. In the scientific arena too this exists.
    For example scientists discovered that matter, quantum of light is not only "solid" but also a wave. Initially this did not make sense. However they continued to pursue that belief until it was proven to be true. Thus the the double slit experiment.
    May be that belief and faith are necessary after some intuition is felt.

    • @HuNgerforrock
      @HuNgerforrock 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      umm, no? You yourself used the word "discovered". It was not a belief, but a measureable phenomena. Then other, independent scientist tried to verify or disprove it, and they had similar results. It was not a made up belief. Neither were they obeying anything nor surrendering their will. They weren't pursuing it, if it would be proven false, they would have discredited it.

  • @veni-vidi-vici-pf55rrrrr8e
    @veni-vidi-vici-pf55rrrrr8e 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Rest in peace 😢

  • @teslarobot
    @teslarobot 12 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    It's like Santa telling you he's not real.

  • @Grayfox2024
    @Grayfox2024 14 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    "god is dead", religion served its purpose in the past when assuaging the anxieties of the natural phenomena, but as science gives us a more simple interpretation, religion is ceasing to serve a purpose, and now just perpetuate irrationality, and leave no room for prudence in extreme situations

  • @extropian314
    @extropian314 12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Bacteria are incredibly tiny compared to most human cells; so they only make up a couple pounds of our weight, even though in-population there are 10 times more of them.

  • @squarerootof2
    @squarerootof2 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I'm not a Martian but I'm stilled impressed and horrified by human stupidity. Spooky...

  • @tehnomask
    @tehnomask 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    @waytohell2 well that's the point, it doesn't "know" it is acting purely without thought. it does not know the advantage it is receiving, it simply does what natural selection selected for.

  • @sandbar3000
    @sandbar3000 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    11: 57 is a wonderful way to put religion. .designed to pull us in so to say. . .

  • @mattjohnston2
    @mattjohnston2 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    2-minute introduction, and although the man may deserve it, skip to 2:20 if you want to start with Mr. Dennett.

  • @StFelly
    @StFelly 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    take a shot every time he says “uh”

  • @1umbnonearth
    @1umbnonearth 13 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Big mega church corporations disagree with you. Perpetrating the ideology is secondary to the profit motive.

  • @squarerootof2
    @squarerootof2 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Man designed the Cow, once food had been assured, He designed himself and got himself domesticated.

  • @biffedya
    @biffedya 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    describing the god delusion like a boss

  • @sandbar3000
    @sandbar3000 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    5:46 very good point. Other churches may follow. . . .

  • @sanfo0or
    @sanfo0or 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hagia Sofia update:
    Church
    Mosque
    Museum
    Mosque

  • @MahdiSalarSadeghi
    @MahdiSalarSadeghi 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Rest in peace 🕊️❤

  • @jeksol
    @jeksol 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    How clever are sheep to acquire shepherds!

    • @jeksol
      @jeksol 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Remember Dennet.

  • @soloyoujo
    @soloyoujo 11 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    "Sheep are pretty stupid". Brilliant!! Hahaha.

  • @B4IRUTUARU16
    @B4IRUTUARU16 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    if you want to study the effects of religion i suggest studying virology

  • @StephanieSoressi
    @StephanieSoressi 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Actually, all science has started out as speculation. That's what a hypothesis is.
    And we must never forget, nature precedes science. Just because we haven't "discovered" something doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
    We are just beginning to scientifically understand the phenomenon of "knowing."
    You should catch up on Carl Sagan award winners for excellence in scientific education #biologicalunderpinningsofreligiosity.