Subaru Legacy Turbo | Acceleration test | 0-60 Mph / 0-100 Km/h
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 ต.ค. 2024
- The new Subaru Legacy 2020 can be equipped with a 4 cylinder 2.4 Turbo with 260 horsepower and 277 lb-ft of torque sent to all four wheels via Subaru’s legendary Symmetrical Full-time All-Wheel Drive.
But how fast is the Subaru Legacy XT ( Or Subaru Legacy GT if you live in Canada )? Is it quick? Let's find out in our Subaru Legacy Turbo Acceleration video!
Important test notes: the First run is in KMH! with the reaction time and the full 0-100 Km/h. Second run: Our Draggy GPS did not work at 100% in km/h, the video didn't render! So we lost a nice quality rendering of that acceleration! But you got the reals numbers that we did with 2 occupants onboard and flat closed roads. The outside temperature was more than 28 Celcius and even if we try to preload the Turbo, numbers are the same. Often the boost effect can be felt when accelerating and the lineartronic transmission hesitates sometimes with the simulation of the gear. So it's not constant in all our test we did, but this is the best we managed to do!
Competition in the sedan cars segment: Toyota Camry | Ford Fusion | Honda Accord | Nissan Altima
Subaru Legacy Playlist:
• Subaru Legacy
Subaru Legacy Turbo | The sedan which is not afraid of any SUV'S!
• Subaru Legacy Turbo | ...
Subaru Legacy Turbo Acceleration test | 0-60 Mph / 0-100 Km/h
• Subaru Legacy Turbo | ...
Car Question Ranking Chart:
goo.gl/gY3x3K
You like? Click on "Thumbs Up"!!
Questions? Add a comment!
Do you want more? Click on "Subscribe"!
CarQuestion TH-cam channel ( English):
/ carquestion1
QuestionAuto chaîne TH-cam (Français):
/ questionauto1
Facebook: Car Question ( English )
goo.gl/KD9WZJ
Facebook : Question Auto ( Français )
/ questionauto
Facebook Personal:
/ thomassin.mathieu
Intagram:
/ m.thomassin_carquestion
Twitter Personal:
/ mthomassin1
Information / business : Mthomassin@hotmail.com
A contribution is always appreciated on Patreon:
www.patreon.co...
#subarulegacy
#subarulegacyxt
#legacyxt
#subaruCanada
#subaruUSA
#subaru
#cars
#Carquestion
#QuestionAuto
#mthomassin
#carsofinstragram
#ajac
*You want to use some of our cool car footage? Contact us first! We can help you!
** This channel is now bad word free under the Car Question agreements! Non-constructive comments using bad words are automatically deleted! We appreciate constructive criticism and respectful disagreement! Thank you for your positive attitude, safe, family-friendly environment in the comments, and keeping it clean for kids and adults and those who love cars and trucks!
Wow, the CVT is so much slower than the manual version! I didn’t know there was so much of a difference. Great video
Is there Subaru Legacy on manual?
people seem to forget the idea of a turbo on this car (or a Mazda CK5 Signature etc) is to give solid performance via big torque numbers. If you need to drag race or boast about your 0-60 (0-100) numbers then these cars aren't meant for you.
The Accord also has a good amount of torque from a low RPM but still manages to run 0-60 in the mid to low 5s.
sleeksilver But the one that runs mid 5s is a 10-speed automatic, not CVT like this subaru
Also they forget that this car has the highest top speed in its segment (150m/h) so it may not be the fastest from 0-60 but put it on a track and it will smoke any 2.0 turbos and v6 non turbo out there
@@sleeksilver I don’t know man, in my experience with the Touring XT 2021 I smoked all the accords I have seen around that pretended to “race”, I would even release the accelerator in order to wait for them and then humiliate them pushing flat once I gave them the illusion that they could get me and I did so for more than once in order to give them a second chance but nothing, sorry.
torque is wins races horsepower sells cars. this car is slow because it has the CVT nothing more nothing less would be surprised if the car limits power to protect the cvt. like subie needs to just get the rnd and make a proper auto. Mazda has proven even an old 6speed is better than a CVT. CVT's are meant for eco crapboxes and base sedans not on a car that cost 30-40k
Important test notes: the First run is in KMH! with the reaction time and the full 0-100 Km/h. Second run: Our Draggy GPS did not work at 100% in km/h, the video didn't render! So we lost a nice quality rendering of that acceleration! But you got the reals numbers that we did with 2 occupants onboard and flat closed roads. The outside temperature was more than 28 Celcius and even if we try to preload the Turbo, numbers are the same. Often the boost effect can be felt when accelerating and the lineartronic transmission hesitates sometimes with the simulation of the gear. So it's not constant in all our test we did, but this is the best we managed to do!
I like how the MPG indicator never goes full negative 01:01
I mean that meter is pretty arbitrary.
it cannot/does not ever go negative. Even while slowing down the engine still burns fuel
because he is moving fast so hes moving more miles per gallon
You need to torque break to 2.5k rpm before launching to get the manufacturer results !
Indeed
I say mid pack for the time. But from the power of the 2.4 turbo, it is slow. As Car Question said, the computer may be limiting the power during break in period. That small center LCD gets too busy with too much information! Also, the engine is loud at full throttle.
I think they need to put a normal transmission. Take a look at BMW 3 series x-drive with 2.0 turbo makes 0-60 in just 5.7 sec and this car has a 2.5L turbo AWD...weird.
too many haters in here following the hat cvt/ subaru trend.
I agree. I would like to see what all these snobs drive.
@@coryduke7582 a Subaru without a CVT probably
the old 2.0 liter of the forester with 240 hp looks faster
Meh.. You may as well get the 2.5L. Turbo isn’t that much faster/2.5L isn’t much slower, CVT sucks whatever fun you’ll have by getting the turbo out of it, and you’ll get a few extra MPGs with the 2.5L. This isn’t a track car anyways and the turbo models can get pretty expensive (for a Subaru).
still 2-3 sec difference, it feels more than number. I have owned a forester 2020 and ascent 2021, 2.4T feels just right when accelerating, but if you want to hear the sound without moving fast(which pisses me off), then 2.5i is good enough.
We need compration acceleration between altima 2.0 turbo and legacy 2.4 turbo
needs a cobb tune
yep! it might do wonders! :)
Needs a 3in exhaust, An air intake/heat wrap, Transmission cooler, 93octane and tuning. Boom 300+hp under 1500
@@Hallowsaw unequal headers too!
مستوى جيد للسوبارو مقارنة بالكامري والالتيما ..
ولكن ينقصهم هم ومازدا التطوير في فئة السيدان خصوصا بأمر الوسع وصرفية البنزين .
اما بقية الأشياء كجودة المواد ورساوة وثبات في الطرقات فلا احتاج اتكلم .
الكتاب باين من عنوانه.
Brake torquing it would’ve put the 0-60 time in the low 6s.
yes, subaru allows you to rev to 2000 rpm, which hits the max torque when taking off
makes me miss the 3.6R
Disappointed with the redline/power-band. This is a sporty sedan not a crossover needing to tow. Should’ve given it at least 6500 fuel cut and a 93 octane tune. Oh well that’s what Cobb is for I guess...
من 0 الى 160 . في 15 ثانيه
سؤال ماهو البنزين اللي في هذا التسارع
Regular fuel! No need for Premium! Check the review my friend here: th-cam.com/video/wq_d6NiMgbg/w-d-xo.html
My dream!
Is there another car in this class that has AWD and 260 HP or higher in this price range?. Mazda 3 is smaller, Camry doesn't. Just curious.
Keep in mind the FA24 in the current tune is only rated at 260hp and because of cheapskates, is tuned for regular 87 octane fuel.
I largely suspect upping the CR and turbo boost and switching to premium 91 octane, you can easily see 330hp+ in this motor. Heck, there are rumors that the 2021 WRX STI would use a heavily tuned FA24 which may reach up to 400hp.
The next gen brz and gt86 is supposed to have this motor too
Aged well
*Is this a snowmobile or something..?*
LOl! no but still capable in snow :P
I was thinking this was my Kaw 250X Ultra jetski! Lol!
it seems like it accelerates like one
I expect the same time for the outback (0a 60 mph) , this is more quick than a maxda cx5 turbo and the honda passport (comparing to outback). Not bat
not bad, but imagine with a little bit of tine tuning art :P
@@CarQuestion yes, but here in Colombia that art not exist, in USA is a common and well excecuted job.
I thought the official quote was 6.1s 0-60 ? Are you driving above sea level?
I suppose he is since very few places on earth are below sea level. I find that his acceleration numbers are usually substantially slower than many other testers.
2004 3.0R Spec B manual is 6.5 seconds, I would be disappointed if 16 years later they had made a car 1 second slower.
@@8G00SE8 The 3.0R is slow compared to a B4 RSK or a S401. 0-60 in 5.2 seconds on my 1998 B4, love the Ej208 and the twinturbo.
It's there any difference in speed between turbo subaru legacy b4 of 2004 and non turbo
Not bad!
Anyone else looking these up after getting gapped at the traffic lights? 😕
This car is almost slower than my stock 1998 lexus gs300
Pretty weak for its class. A 15 second quarter mile is a pretty standard time for 200hp n/a 4 cylinders.
2 persons on board, 28 celcius ouside, brand new car without a few K's on the dispay and you can feel they limit the boost on launch.
Dima K the Altima is also very weak for the class.
@@mattX5 How was this even relevant to what I wrote above? Altima is one of the quickest cars for under 200hp, and it's sure not much slower than this Subaru, given 188hp.
Dima K really? Are you that incompetent and stupid or are you just exaggerating to try and prove your point? I could make a list of at least 20 cars faster than the Altima with under 200 hp. The base Altima with under 200hp does 0-60 in 7.4 seconds, which is laughable. The new legacy can hit 0-60 in 6.2 in the right conditions, these guys did it in 6.9, as they said it was because it was a new car with 28 degree temperatures. That’s quite far ahead of the Altima buddy.
@@mattX5 I think someone else here is acting really stupid, and bringing in irrelevant things. Find me a car under 200hp that does 0-60 in under 6.8 seconds (as the new Altima 2.5 does). Name at least 10 cars on the US market.
th-cam.com/video/s_srA3KzE8Y/w-d-xo.html
optional mt avaliable?
Subaru made this turbo engine considering higher standard safety, and to achieve that they used the CVT to make it safe!!! 0-60mph in 6.78 is very safe!!!!!
Can you test Subaru WRX 2020? CVT
it’ll blow up
Was it in sport mode?
God I hate that CVT
lol, simulate or not to simulate, there is the question!
Car Question I hate when they simulate. Like just put a proper auto in there.
Doc's Stim Pistol blame the uninformed consumer and haters.
For its power numbers, it’s pretty disappointing
Its cause its a subaru
GS350より少し遅いくらいか
Subaru: please make a Honda StepWGN alternative for the Japanese market ;)
Prefferably with turbo engine ;)
Why not in manual mode?
Uh because that just adds fake shifts and slows it down.
VNレヴォーグみたいですね
Might as well buy a mazda 3 2.5 turbo. Its faster, sounds better, same mpg, better interior, and less money 🤣
@Operanix 100% looks better. In regards to its durability that's a very different story 😂
HYBRID?
It’s hard to watch gas cars after going electric. If you floor my LEAF at speed the response is instantaneous, where this car seems like it needs almost a half second before the speed starts to increase.
while 2010 legacy 5th version 2.5 turbo can do 5.5 seconds 0-100 Km/h.........................lol
Think the old 3.6r is quicker..
あんまり早くないんだなぁ。レボーグ2.0の方が全然早い。
まぁ燃費とか色々良くなってるんだけど。。。
It’s an Altima basically
CVT sloth.
is there only one gear???
It's a CVT...
Aashish Bharadwaj can u explain it?
how come does it already redline but still acelerated
@@caominh2874 Because as I said, it's a CVT. A continuously variable transmission.
CVTs have an infinite number of "gears" because they're just a belt or chain between two pulleys. That way, the computer can always maintain the optimal RPM.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuously_variable_transmission
Wtf happened? Subaru Legacy GT of the past was faster than this.
Many reasons make Subaru legacy slow:
1. Ground clearance
2. AWD system
3. CVT transmission
4. Boxer engine
5. Lazy Subaru engineers
CVT transmission : can send engine power up to 60/40 for front/rear wheels and that's not good. I think Subaru need 8 speed transmission from Hyundai that can send engine power up to 10/90 between front/rear wheels.
AWD: Subaru can't do alot with AWD due to CVT limitations and they enhance AWD system by updating traction control systems and ABS.
BOXES engine: its seems to be hard to develop it and need a lot of money it's time for Subaru to send Boxer engine to museum, and start develop line engine.
My Life Haters Gonna Hate...
not so fast for 2.4l turbo
i want to more power sorry.
CVT.....
Bad acceleration
My legacy 2008 h6 non cvt tle acceleration from 0 to 100 in 6.1 s
It is whithout turbo
Go eat pork
My 2010 2.5i limited is faster than this lol got a track engine and a turbo tho
Thats baaaad, for turbo car
Lucky You It’s the CVT. It ruins the car.
Slow slow slow
VW GLI beats this easily.
Not good enough.
Dismal
why
Very bad
why is that?
@@CarQuestion thought it would be faster
@@fozzy_che
It is bad because you thought it'd be faster... clearly, you are right [/sarcasm].
Perhaps you were expecting the results of a 2014 WRX or STI ? Both cars which are lighter, less equipped and less fuel efficient. But maybe then again all that matters is an acceleration test from standstill because that's how we drive all day long...