The BEST features of Betaflight 4.5

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 75

  • @FPVUniversity
    @FPVUniversity  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Betaflight GPS and GPS Rescue - everything that you have to know th-cam.com/video/fmMAu0bQl1E/w-d-xo.html

    • @DavidHanniganJr
      @DavidHanniganJr 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Different goals of the program.

  • @TechnicallyTom
    @TechnicallyTom 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I’m hoping that this is the beginning of moving many features only available in iNav into BetaFlight. I know one of the things holding BetaFlight back from doing this was maintaining compatibility with flight controllers with less memory but the cloud build system should make that not an issue. I expect h7 flight controllers to become more popular if this happens as it may only be possible to run all of these features on flight controllers with more memory. BetaFlight flight characteristics have been so good for so long that improvements are going to be difficult to find. Awhile back I tried switching a 7” to iNav and it had scary twitches that looked almost like it was getting ready to do a desync. It probably just needed to be tuned but I had no idea where to start and reverted it back to BetaFlight.

  • @serang
    @serang 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    Why don't they just put INAV and BF under the same roof?

    • @piotrwojtas3501
      @piotrwojtas3501 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Very good idea. There is a compilation option in betaflight

    • @FPVUniversity
      @FPVUniversity  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      that is NOT that simple as is seems. INAV is ahead years of navigation related development. BF is years ahead in things like BiDir DSHOT as super fancy filters. Combining both would a big task. probably it's way simpler to migrate BF features to INAV than the other way around

    • @RichardAFPV
      @RichardAFPV 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Two very different tools for different kinds of flying.

    • @peekabooooooooo
      @peekabooooooooo 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Why don't Microsoft and Apple merge? Competion! 😉

    • @serang
      @serang 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@peekabooooooooo AFAIK, MS and Apple are in commercial business with proprietary software. BF and INAV are opensource community project. CMIIW

  • @JohnCuppi
    @JohnCuppi 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    M10 GPS support out of the box is exactly what I needed to go ahead and add one to my Cinebot30. Great job BF team, and merry Christmas Pawel!

    • @FPVUniversity
      @FPVUniversity  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks, you too!

  • @BrainDeadEngineering
    @BrainDeadEngineering 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sweet! I am glad they have been messaging the GPS functions. I was only weeks from converting my C7's to INAV primarily for its GPS Pros. I hope they worked on the issue with how violent the vehicle rotates towards home direction when RTM/FS is initiated. Its common to unscrew the two props off on larger powerful Quads and crash. Thanks BF Dev's and FPV-U .

  • @johncarold
    @johncarold 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hi Pawel, Great video and review of the new features of Betaflight 4.5 , I just finished my 7in quad and I can't wait to try these new features. Thanks for the video and information.

  • @MCsCreations
    @MCsCreations 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks a bunch for all the info, Pawel! 😊
    I just hope they fixed the 4.4* bugs. 😬
    Anyway, stay safe there with your family! 🖖😊
    Merry Christmas and happy new year!

    • @FPVUniversity
      @FPVUniversity  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You and me both!

  • @TimsDrones
    @TimsDrones 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I won't hold my breath over the BF navigation features. I finally put INAV on a quad. Works fine. But out of curiosity, I did try the altitude hold - out of the box so to speak - I didn't set anything up for it, IOW. I added it to my INAV menu, tried it, and found that by default without adjustments or calibrating anything for INAV alt-hold, it slowly flew into the ground. Now - since I have no real need for it other than satisfying my curiosity, I didn't investigate any further, and instead removed alt-hold from my setup. At any rate - I self navigate using FPV. So - BF getting INAV navigation features, specially ones that require coddling to make em work right like alt-hold, just does not tease my expectations.
    Although I do get an odd kick from seeing the BF homing arrow move around as I fly - it's just not necessary - never needed it, IOW, and never will - only ever flying in my own backyard (3 acres).
    Always enjoy your vids.

    • @FPVUniversity
      @FPVUniversity  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      INAV is a few years ahead of BF in terms of navigation. It will be a long way for Betaflight to catch up for sure

  • @FreelojoFPV
    @FreelojoFPV 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If you would like to try EZ Landing read the release notes for proper set up, as it is NEW and must be enabled in CLI.

    • @FPVUniversity
      @FPVUniversity  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      you are 100% correct

  • @alexanderwharton1434
    @alexanderwharton1434 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    wow, great video Pavo! Thank you so much for sharing! !!!!!!

  • @that_jason_black
    @that_jason_black 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    20204 will be very interesting. Thanks P!

  • @adamus572g4
    @adamus572g4 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Świetny wykład, wspaniałe zmiany na lepsze w oprogramowaniu kopterów. Tylko co z tego jak coraz bardziej przykręcają śrubę dla użytkowników świetnego hobby. Ja już 5" i wyżej całkowicie odpuściłem.

    • @FPVUniversity
      @FPVUniversity  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      zawsze można się nie przejmować regulacjami i latać daleko od ludzi

  • @kisssys5414
    @kisssys5414 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Looking forward to the improvement in landing, I resurrected a couple of Autoquad choppers to use when I needed to land somewhere remotely without having to slam it down and hit disarm.
    This has always been my biggest complaint of Betaflight.

  • @dove6531
    @dove6531 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    for me this good news. maybe this what should be done. i think BF should focus on quads/multi rotors and INAV on fixed wings/Vtol.

  • @jaysonrees738
    @jaysonrees738 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'll be real. I completely forgot that Betaflight even had plane support. Great to see that some of the fancier stuff will hit Betaflight though. Most of the cheaper stuff doesn't get anything but Betaflight support, and I absolutely hate dealing with code of any kind. Gives me more options. Keeping my expensive stuff on iNav though.

  • @gregstewart4692
    @gregstewart4692 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I apologize. I just checked the Description. I should have done that first. What I need is there, sorry 😊

  • @KCQuadTronX
    @KCQuadTronX 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    great vueo as always!!!! God Bless

  • @gregstewart4692
    @gregstewart4692 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hello and thank you for the work you do. I have 3 FC’s that are programmed with 4.5 from the start. I think I need Configurator 10.10, Could you please give me the links for what I need to be able to safely use these FC’s? I tried to downgrade one of them to 4.3 but there is no target since I need the next configurator. 😊 Thank you in advance.

  • @NunoFPV
    @NunoFPV 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks !

  • @AlfieDoug
    @AlfieDoug 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Tried it on my speedy bee F405 mini, quad X motors won't work it says 0 outputs for motors, tried copying both Diff and diff all from my working 4.4.3 but that does not fix it still cant use motors, have I missed a new setting ?

  • @loukasdrones3038
    @loukasdrones3038 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Are there any plans for Earth Reference in INAV?

    • @FPVUniversity
      @FPVUniversity  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      INAV has something like that for years. Take a look at github.com/iNavFlight/inav/wiki/Modes#turn-assist

    • @loukasdrones3038
      @loukasdrones3038 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Great, thanks, I'll give it a go@@FPVUniversity

  • @spartan3299
    @spartan3299 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    INAV Failsafe isn't scary. Well, maybe a little pucker factor here..th-cam.com/video/ZwTHBTkCI4o/w-d-xo.html.
    at 4:10 I don't notice FS!, at 4:25..Now I see it. More pucker at 4:36. At 4:40 I fail to notice in time to avoid the wire strike! At 4:42 the Dart 635mm spins of the mass of its components allowing an easy rebuild. Only the wing spar was lost as it bent like a bow to be launched into oblivion. The doom was not to be and she flies again with a more reliable elrs rcvr. By the way, this was my first use of auto landing. I note that it was making a perfect approach for landing if that guy wire hadn't thwarted the approach. Maybe a terrain feature might be added to say INAV 10? Thanks to all the Devs and content creators who have made the best hobby even better!

  • @FS_Performance
    @FS_Performance 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    In BF 4.5 arming wont work anymore on my mob7. I test linke everything and dont have status issus with arming but i get only a short beep from the esc and then nothing. Only flashing to older firmware solves the problem...

    • @AlfieDoug
      @AlfieDoug 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I have the same problem with my speedybee f405mini stack.

  • @squirrelynutz1
    @squirrelynutz1 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Will my pids tuning transfer easily over from 4.4.3 to 4.5? With cli? Or adding it manually.

  • @deepaksarhoch1487
    @deepaksarhoch1487 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    With INAV 7, while inducing RTH, my quad just flips 180 degree and drops to ground, i was in angle and altitude hold mode around 50 mtr away at 3 meter height. Please help.

    • @FPVUniversity
      @FPVUniversity  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Than something is wrong with ACC alignment and calibration

    • @deepaksarhoch1487
      @deepaksarhoch1487 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@FPVUniversity thanks for reply sir, i will re calibrate and try, merry Christmas and happy new year

    • @deepaksarhoch1487
      @deepaksarhoch1487 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@FPVUniversity i tried accelerometer calibration, it is not getting calibrated in nose down position, what can be the issue

  • @gogus357
    @gogus357 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Dzięki Paweł ❤

    • @FPVUniversity
      @FPVUniversity  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      proszę bardzo!

  • @calabrese221
    @calabrese221 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Pavel can i copy diff from 4.4 to 4.5?

    • @FPVUniversity
      @FPVUniversity  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      yes, most functions will be transferred

    • @karlijnroelofs9499
      @karlijnroelofs9499 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Not a good idea if you ask the BF devs. Read the release notes man!

    • @calabrese221
      @calabrese221 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @karlijnroelofs9499 ok thanks I'll just start from scratch

  • @crckdns
    @crckdns 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Seems like BF got scared by inav and ardupilot and started working at missing/asked functions 😹

    • @FPVUniversity
      @FPVUniversity  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      it's a lot of work to close the gap

  • @riyazmailmohammed
    @riyazmailmohammed 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    betaflight showing video transmitter current values device ready says false....what to do? Please help....

    • @flat-earther
      @flat-earther 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      did you enable tramp or smartaudio on the correct port

    • @riyazmailmohammed
      @riyazmailmohammed 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@flat-earther Yes vtx connected with rx3 so in Port vtx selected in Uart3.

    • @flat-earther
      @flat-earther 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@riyazmailmohammed the Rx from VTx goes to Tx on flight controller

    • @FPVUniversity
      @FPVUniversity  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      what does status command in CLI say?

    • @riyazmailmohammed
      @riyazmailmohammed 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      In CLI status i didn't check. When started this issue. Before this vtx worked well.

  • @alexanderwharton1434
    @alexanderwharton1434 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    obs: Pawell... that's what i meant. This grammar corrections, urgh

  • @ydnubm
    @ydnubm 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    first

  • @rafaelnasser1636
    @rafaelnasser1636 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    i wish BF devs were intelligent 🥲takes so long for basic shit... it should be opensource because they suck and need help

    • @FPVUniversity
      @FPVUniversity  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      oh, don't be so harsh. You do know, they all work for free, right?

    • @rafaelnasser1636
      @rafaelnasser1636 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@FPVUniversity thus why i mentioned the project should be opensource so we stop wasting time waiting for their slow and bad development. Dont you see all the 3d slicers? All of them are opensource which enabled fast development and great functionalities. If BF did the same the community could help them where they're slow/bad.

    • @saturn_fpv
      @saturn_fpv 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@rafaelnasser1636it's open source dude. Everybody, including you, can help. If you don't, then stop complaining...

    • @rafaelnasser1636
      @rafaelnasser1636 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@saturn_fpv it is? I'll check that out but last I knew it isn't.

    • @saturn_fpv
      @saturn_fpv 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @rafaelnasser1636 Always has been. It was forked from cleanflight, which is also open source.

  • @martincosta8375
    @martincosta8375 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Anyone else cant get sbus_buad_fast = on to work ?? Says invalid task