@prempititantipool3075 why so aggressive. A true tennis fan will be respectful to all of the big three. You're comment shows that you have zero love for the game and you have probably a pretty boring live
I missed the one against Roddick US’07 first set tiebreak where the commentator yells “Roddick cant play a better point than that, how did he lose it???!”
Djokovic and most of newgen are grinders - the magic, grace and variety and sheer genius skill and shots that almost defy logic - those sadly are not there anymore in Tennis ( Nick Krygios has some of this - but sadly he is nowhere in the scheme of things )
Fedsqaush had lots of success with b players and b tournaments where he won 50% of his titles on the 250/500 circuit..When it came to nadal/djoki over is career he only won 33% of their GS matches which includes GS finals!! 33% is complete failure!! Fed couldn't even beat nadal once at french and lossed on his supposed best surface grass 3 times in a row to djoki Wimbledon finals.. Fed has a weak backhand, was weak mentally and didn't have tennis smarts. But FEDsqaush did sell lots of running shoes!!
You only know to judge people and use statistics in a horrible way. You have every right to say that Nadal and Djoker and every player that you think is a better player player and that is respectable. However, trying to underestimate someone's career in order to prove that your choice is better, it is just stupid. Federer could have won more 200 or 500 hundrend tournaments but in his last 10 years of his career chose to not participate in any 200 tournaments. All the great players have won many 500 tournaments and that is not bad. Federer has won 20 grand slams and in the majority of them he won against Nadal, Djokovic, Murray, Wawrinka, Del Potro, Hewitt, Roddick, Safin etc. He has won 26 masters (3rd of all time) and 6 ATP finals (2nd of all time). He has won all these trophies in a very beatiful way that made fans to pay tickets months before of his matches!!!! And yeah this is why he is selling so much shoes! I do not beleive that he is the GOAT (do not believe in GOAT theory in general), but i am watching his highlights for more than 15 years and i stiil dont get bored. What you just comment is really shamefull and the first guy you need to apologise is to yourself.
@@kostaschatzidakis8289 sounds like u like pageantries and should try that channel sports is not for u.. Only thing that matters is he failed agaisnt his 2 rivals over his career and nothing will change that..U watch ur sqaush player all u want his game just couldn't hold -up to NADal/Djoki is why he failed agaisn tthem..U sound like a typical armchair tennis player who drank the marketing koolaid from watch/running shoe commercials..All ur stats are 3rd place or less
@@kostaschatzidakis8289, great response. It's also important to note that administrators introduced slower balls and slower courts in the mid 2000s, giving baseliners a bit more reaction time, more time to react to serve and discouraging serve and volleyers from coming into the net.
Now this is just stupidity. He won 20 slams, 6 year end champs, 28 masters and was the top 3 player even until 39 years old. He did not lose 3 times in a row to djoki Wimbledon finals. He lost only twice in a row after already 33-34 years old against a prime djoki. djoki didn't even make the next 2 wimbledon finals, losing in 3rd round in 2016 to Querrey and QF in 2017 to Berdych. Now, 38 years old Federer made it to the match point against 32 years old Djoki. On the other hand, Djoki at 36, 37 lost twice in a row against 20-21 Carlos, both not reaching match points and once without even winning a single set. It's obvious you put the same age Djoki in the finals, he would lose all. Couldn't even beat Federer until he was already 33, lost in straight sets in Murray in 2013. Not beating prime Nadal in French is normal. He is best clay player in history. Even Djokovic could only do it once after Nadal already 35 years old or in 2015 when he was injured, and that's after already dominating in RG since 19 years old (minus injury years). Djokovic didn't dominate slams until 23 years old. Djoki has 100% loss rate against Cecchinato and Safin in slams. 100% loss is complete failure! Only has 33% win rate against Alcaraz in slams which includes GS finals where it is 0% win!! 0-33% is complete failure!!
@@vijayendranvijay457 u sound desperate and not too bright ranting on ..Djoki beat Fed 3 times in a row at wimbledon finals, Djoki beat nadal 9 times on clay and 3 times at roland garros..Fed beat nadal only 2 times on clay and never at french. All ur other stats who cares every player has one off stats agaisnt someone...if you like the fedsqaush inferior game go for it that just means u drank the marketing koolaid and u sound like ur typical armchair tennis player..think ur should go out and buy some fed running shoes
![ลองสุ่มไอโฟน 990 โกงมั้ย? [ โกงมั้ยครับ ep.101 ] | DOM](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/bfsWe0j492k/mqdefault.jpg)
a great title and so perfect an illustration of FR. the greatest mass sport athlete of the 21st century.
I see the GOAT, I click
You mean Fraduderer the 40-15 goat?
@@prempititantipool3075 how is he a fraud?
@prempititantipool3075 why so aggressive. A true tennis fan will be respectful to all of the big three. You're comment shows that you have zero love for the game and you have probably a pretty boring live
Then you clicked on the wrong video
the goat of running shoe sales
Roger is such a delight to watch on court! I smile every time he skillfully "humiliates" his opponents
8:20 I think its the only time i hear Federer scream that loud, ever.
I love listening to all the other players grunting and yelping in every language on every point while Roger silently and steadily annihilates them.
I missed the one against Roddick US’07 first set tiebreak where the commentator yells “Roddick cant play a better point than that, how did he lose it???!”
or against Nadal in Wim07 / del Potro in US09 to get the first break.
The opponents feel depressed
0:35 what's the name again?
you will never see this kind of vidéos of best points with djokovic ! because he is not able to this tennis
That’s right! Djokovic is not capable of playing loser clown tennis like Federer because he’s a winner.
Djokovic and most of newgen are grinders - the magic, grace and variety and sheer genius skill and shots that almost defy logic - those sadly are not there anymore in Tennis ( Nick Krygios has some of this - but sadly he is nowhere in the scheme of things )
@@Kidilam2006hummm🐝🐝🇪🇦 are you sur that there are not anymore
Go see this Guy. Before
But you are right to precize " almost"
@@Kidilam2006I agree. Federer’s attacking all-court style of play was unmatched. Alcatraz can also play an all-court game so the future looks bright.
These are not too impressive. Most points the opponents play a bad shot that opens the door
Or the opponents are weak
Fedsqaush had lots of success with b players and b tournaments where he won 50% of his titles on the 250/500 circuit..When it came to nadal/djoki over is career he only won 33% of their GS matches which includes GS finals!! 33% is complete failure!! Fed couldn't even beat nadal once at french and lossed on his supposed best surface grass 3 times in a row to djoki Wimbledon finals.. Fed has a weak backhand, was weak mentally and didn't have tennis smarts. But FEDsqaush did sell lots of running shoes!!
You only know to judge people and use statistics in a horrible way. You have every right to say that Nadal and Djoker and every player that you think is a better player player and that is respectable. However, trying to underestimate someone's career in order to prove that your choice is better, it is just stupid. Federer could have won more 200 or 500 hundrend tournaments but in his last 10 years of his career chose to not participate in any 200 tournaments. All the great players have won many 500 tournaments and that is not bad. Federer has won 20 grand slams and in the majority of them he won against Nadal, Djokovic, Murray, Wawrinka, Del Potro, Hewitt, Roddick, Safin etc. He has won 26 masters (3rd of all time) and 6 ATP finals (2nd of all time). He has won all these trophies in a very beatiful way that made fans to pay tickets months before of his matches!!!! And yeah this is why he is selling so much shoes! I do not beleive that he is the GOAT (do not believe in GOAT theory in general), but i am watching his highlights for more than 15 years and i stiil dont get bored. What you just comment is really shamefull and the first guy you need to apologise is to yourself.
@@kostaschatzidakis8289 sounds like u like pageantries and should try that channel sports is not for u.. Only thing that matters is he failed agaisnt his 2 rivals over his career and nothing will change that..U watch ur sqaush player all u want his game just couldn't hold -up to NADal/Djoki is why he failed agaisn tthem..U sound like a typical armchair tennis player who drank the marketing koolaid from watch/running shoe commercials..All ur stats are 3rd place or less
@@kostaschatzidakis8289, great response. It's also important to note that administrators introduced slower balls and slower courts in the mid 2000s, giving baseliners a bit more reaction time, more time to react to serve and discouraging serve and volleyers from coming into the net.
Now this is just stupidity. He won 20 slams, 6 year end champs, 28 masters and was the top 3 player even until 39 years old. He did not lose 3 times in a row to djoki Wimbledon finals. He lost only twice in a row after already 33-34 years old against a prime djoki. djoki didn't even make the next 2 wimbledon finals, losing in 3rd round in 2016 to Querrey and QF in 2017 to Berdych. Now, 38 years old Federer made it to the match point against 32 years old Djoki. On the other hand, Djoki at 36, 37 lost twice in a row against 20-21 Carlos, both not reaching match points and once without even winning a single set. It's obvious you put the same age Djoki in the finals, he would lose all. Couldn't even beat Federer until he was already 33, lost in straight sets in Murray in 2013.
Not beating prime Nadal in French is normal. He is best clay player in history. Even Djokovic could only do it once after Nadal already 35 years old or in 2015 when he was injured, and that's after already dominating in RG since 19 years old (minus injury years). Djokovic didn't dominate slams until 23 years old.
Djoki has 100% loss rate against Cecchinato and Safin in slams. 100% loss is complete failure! Only has 33% win rate against Alcaraz in slams which includes GS finals where it is 0% win!! 0-33% is complete failure!!
@@vijayendranvijay457 u sound desperate and not too bright ranting on ..Djoki beat Fed 3 times in a row at wimbledon finals, Djoki beat nadal 9 times on clay and 3 times at roland garros..Fed beat nadal only 2 times on clay and never at french. All ur other stats who cares every player has one off stats agaisnt someone...if you like the fedsqaush inferior game go for it that just means u drank the marketing koolaid and u sound like ur typical armchair tennis player..think ur should go out and buy some fed running shoes