In general, all stands indicate that the range of the 'caliber' missile = 2500 kilometers! why are you deceiving the audience? you simply indicated the distance from the Caspian Sea to Syria is 1500 kilometers. and for that matter, in Russia, even under the USSR, there were long-range ship-based missiles, and it’s strange to hear that only the USA and Britain had this.
He leaves it for you to make the decision. And to me, it is obvious that the tomahawk is better. It is more connected, has loitering capabilities, and is less susceptible to countermeasures.
@@Krkovic100 Ukrainians have not been hit by Tomahawks. They have nothing to compare the Kalibr missiles to. Wouldn't you think if they both have about the same accuracy, the same range, the same payload, that the one that is harder to jam, that can have its target changed in flight, that is more connected, and can loiter, would be the superior one?
@@PpAirO5 In fact, the Russians and most of the world are biased and vindictive to the American people, which is why they don't like anyone in America.
until 2015, the fact that only the USA and Great Britain had long-range cruise missiles could only or from someone who does not know about Soviet and Russian weapons. In the USSR, cruise missiles appeared earlier than in the USA, and in the 70-80s the USSR already had cruise missiles with a range of 3000 and 5000 kilometers (December 9, 1976, the Decree of the Council of Ministers of the USSR was issued on the development of a universal strategic supersonic cruise missile 3M-25 "Meteorite" with a flight range of about 5000 kilometers. The rocket was supposed to become universal and get the ability to launch both from the sea - "Meteorit-M", and from aviation - "Meteorite-A" carriers. The rocket exists) , the caliber also did not appear in the 2000s, its ancestors are different modifications of the calibers of the 70-80s with a range of 3000 kilometers one of his ancestors is a unique ancestor - the S-10 Granat missile system with a long-range cruise missile KS-122 (3M10) equipped with a nuclear warhead. with a range of 2500 kilometers. The missiles of the Caliber family were created on the basis of two projects: the 3M10 strategic nuclear cruise missile with a combat radius of 2500 km developed during the period from 1975 to 1984 at the Novator Design Bureau and the competition of anti-ship missiles Alfa (R&D "Turquoise"). Initially, only the Yakhont supersonic anti-ship missile took part in the Biryuza R&D competition, but its development was delayed, and the rocket came out expensive. At the same time, the 3M10 project had problems due to the planned Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty. And the Novator Design Bureau, on its own initiative, in 1986, a non-nuclear version of the naval version of the KS-122 missile was proposed for competition, however, it did not suit the selection committee because of the subsonic attack speed. Work continued, and in 1990 a finished version appeared with a supersonic finish booster to overcome enemy defense systems. However, the beginning of the collapse of the USSR suspended the introduction of this product. Also, in parallel, the development of an anti-submarine complex based on the KS-122 was carried out to replace the bulky and obsolete Vodopad and Rastrub-B complexes. The first version of the rocket in this direction was presented in 1997. The Kalibr family rockets were first presented to the general public at MAKS-93. The Russian Navy is armed with the Kalibr missile system. According to open sources, the maximum firing range of the 3M14 cruise missile from the composition of this complex, flying at subsonic speed, reaches about 2 thousand km. A variant of the Caliber-NK complex has been developed for surface ships, and the Caliber-PL complex has been developed for submarines. In particular, Russian frigates of project 22350, corvettes of project 21631 Buyan-M, multi-purpose nuclear submarines of project 885 Yasen, non-nuclear submarines of projects 877 and 636.3, and other ships are armed with Caliber. On January 8, 2018, there were reports in the media about the start of work on the development of a modified version of the Caliber-M missile. According to a source, “The latest high-precision ship-based Caliber-M cruise missile with a maximum firing range of more than 4,500 km is being developed for the Navy. ( Today Caliber is much better than Tamogawk.Therefore, autumn is stupid to believe that Russia does not have long-range missiles until 2015. Russia has cruise missiles with a range of 5,500 kilometers, both sea and air based. Various modifications of Caliber also have a range of 300 to 4500 kilometers. Therefore, your data on the range of 1500 kilometers is not correct. the maximum range of one of the modifications is 4500 kilometers, the range of calibers used in Syria is 2500 kilometers. Today in Ukraine, various export-type modifications are used, cheap up to 300 kilometers and more expensive up to 2500, the same as in Syria, as well as Iskander strategic missiles up to 550 kilometers (cruised and ballistic), and Onyxes with a range of 550 kilometers as well, and also air-based
@@jha77jha77 You're a fool . Su57 showed well in a real situation, unlike the Western f22, which did not participate in one conflict because it was crap and f35, which has more than 700 malfunctions so far🤣🤣🤣 And by the way, the su 57 is mass-produced. as for the T14, there is no need for it, with the assumption that the T90 is the best tank of competitors that has no competitors in the west, while it is cheaper than any
En ucrania los kalibr han entrado impunemente venciendo a lo mejor de los sistemas de detección e interceptación de la otan. En cambio, los Tomahawk no han Sido probados contra ejércitos verdaderos, con sistemas y armamentos modernos
Как это не испытывались, конфликт буря в пустыне 1991 года именно тогда американские крылатые ракеты отлично себя зарекомендовали. Российский калибр это всего лишь копия американского "томагавка", причем плохая копия.
Thats nonsense. If you don't hit your target, your power level is 0. If your missile gets jammed, your power level is 0. If your missile gets intercepted, your power level is 0. And 0 is certainly not "the most powerfull".
@@walterrivera2183 that was the claim of the West russia dient say that because They know that the Ukraine has the strongest Arms in Europe.They has More Field Artillerie than the US.
How can it be better when it doesn't do 100% of the job and can be easily jammed? You are the one who doesn't want to deal with reality. You are coping, hard!
While balancing is pretty good but not good enough because the truth is way more important. God told me that Russian missiles (both offense and defense system) are far more advanced. If the war to break out between these two nations (NATO included) the U.S. stands no chance against Russia, both conventional and nuclear.. God also told me that Russia, North Korea, and Iran have been reserved and preserved for a thousand years to punish America and her western allies that follow the same sinful lifestyle.. The only way to calm Russia and her allies down is for the public to repent.
Обзор достоин уважения за честность и непредвзятый взгляд на обе ракеты. Действительно пока сложно сказать какая из них лучше, но, в любом случае, отсутствие утверждений в стиле "это лучше, просто потому, что это наше" добавляет симпатии автору.
Muy bonito el Barquito...una joya de ingeniería...pero cuando se ponga "gordo el asunto" entre Yankees y el Oso Siberiano,Pero será "PAN COMIDO ", Para los misiles Iskander,Khinzal, Ónix,S-350, o los misiles Ipersonicos Kalibr ...Son una chulada tecnológica
US has tomahawk and how many different type of cruise missiles Russia got ? Kinda answers that dilemma. And if you think Russia running out then look what they fired in Ukraine so far and Vostok last month ( biggest military exercises seen since ww2) which fires Armageddon in barrages .
@@TKUA11 you know exactly what I put and am British as far back the crusades, nice try though. Dunno why you think am little either ? Ha ha ha . You bitch about my grammar and yours is probably worse than mine
@@chariesbergero9662 "не смеет стрелять" - с каких пор попрошайки рассказываю кто что смеет?) Твой обкеканый блок, куда вы так стремитесь, спрашивает разрешение постоянно
Kalibr Missile series are promising and more cheaper, more range.... While Tomahawk Missile is old and too expensive, lower range and more susceptible to electronic warfare jamming that it was reported in their Syrian campaign while their bombarding ISIS and Assad's bases simultaneously that they must cross the radar defense of Russian bases in Syria.... Only a handful of block 4 Tomahawk Cruise missiles are capable of the current modern warfare.... If block 5 is successful they must add a bit more range to have a comparable range against old Kalibr Cruise missiles of Russia that are 4k+ km range
@@Headhear Десять штук в мес. это тираж достаточны в военное время ? Да и одна ракета , будь она и лучшая не решает исход войны. Войну побеждает армия со всем комплексом вооружения и выучки.
Garbage. With 2300+ combat firings, no Tomahawk was ever shot down.... or jammed. Oh, jamming is pretty much a BS story made up by vodka swilling katsaps to make the fan boys moist.
Considering the fail rate of Kalibr in Ukraine I would say that the Tomahawk is better in EW protected areas. The range for Kalibr is unknown but iit is very hard to believe that the Kalibr-M will have that long of a range. For the other Kalibr variants the Tomahawks have advantage in range
@@napobg6842 In any case, Russia is lagging behind in military developments. If they have done anything similar to Tomogawk, they are lagging behind in dozens of other areas. One missile, even the best one, does not decide the outcome of the war.
@@simonsymo5361 Yes we have seen the video where Patriots shell out 30 missiles that's around $150 million and yet gets destroyed. They first banned Russian media from TH-cam and then you can only rely on one sided information which is biased.
@@simonsymo5361 чугунная авиабомба времен Второй Мировой войны не является крылатой ракетой «Калибр». Украинская сторона не предъявила ни одного доказательства перехвата Калибра
Tomhawk is the real deal accuracy n changing the course of direction of the target,heat seaker n it can maintain moving over head until u get the choice of hit
En el último ataque masivo con misiles tomahawks que hizo EE UU contra Siria, la defensa electrónica suministrada por Rusia provocó que estos misiles cayeran como moscas sobre las arenas sirias como moscas inermes.....ya Rusia ni los recogía para estudiarlos....
Там особо уже изучать нечего, интерес представляют последние модификации томагавков. Томагавки это старые ракеты, против современных средств противодействия РЭБ и ПВО они бесполезны.
America at least has something to compare with Kalibre but I wonder if they have any to compare to Kinzhal, zircon or avangard all deployed and some used.
@Tyson S that's because we haven't given them the weapons they really need. we're trying to stop this thing and become a stalemate like North and South Korea.
So then can you explain why after more than 2300 firings, no Tomahawk has been shot down and yet sunflower farmers in Ukraine have lost count of how many kalibr's they have destroyed... Brains all in your butt?
Totally agree with you. Syria showed it good. Tomahawks were intercepted pretty easy by Pansir, tor, s200 and buk.. I saw an exhibition from Moscow of these Tomahawks with serial # from Syria.
God told me that Russian Kalibr missiles are far more capable and is superior to the U.S. Tomahawk missiles. That was one of the reasons how Russia saved Syria so quickly from being taken over by the U.S.
Después de lo visto últimamente en la guerra de Ucrania no hay posibilidad de comparación ya que los misiles Rusos están muy por encima en tecnología. También vimos fracasar a los Tomahawk en Siria donde la mayoría fueron inutilizados por Rusia. Por no hablar de las capacidades hipersonicas de Rusia, donde Estados Unidos no solo se quedó atras, sino que no dispone de esa tecnología y de las armas hipersonicas que ya tiene Rusia, China o incluso Irán. Basar el desarrollo militar en tener bases por todo el planeta, en los obsoletos portaviones, o en el fallido F35 ha echo retrasar a Estados Unidos, gastar todos sus recursos al basarse su poderío en armas obsoletas como los mencionados portaaviones, los sistemas patriot que también fracasaron en Ucrania ante los misiles hipersonicos rusos kinzal, o los también obsoletos Tomahawk, ha echo que solo puedan ser efectivos contra Naciones debiles o indefensas. Contra potencias como Rusia ya hemos comprobado que están bastante atrás
X-22(Kh-22) destroyed the Patriot air defense system! Against the X-47 M2 (Kh-47 M2), this complex is generally powerless, the Patriot air defense system would not even be able to produce one shot if it were the target!
@@inaina3674 a Rússia detém o domínio completo na tecnologia dos mísseis. Durante muito tempo, o único meio de se chegar a Estação Espacial Internacional, era através da nave russa
@Helton there's a big difference between missile dominance and being the only one manufacturing rocket engines. For whatever reasons our governmental entities preferred to farm out the manufacturing of the rocket engines to Russia. You're kidding yourself if you really think it's because that was beyond our engineering capability. It was a favor to the Russian aerospace tech sector, and it was convenient for the US. Musk looked over the numbers and saw that Russia was overcharging by a considerable amount for it's 1980's era rocket engine designs read: obsolete/inefficient. The Russian engines were disposable for a reason. Thus he was able to introduce a modern state of the art engine design utilizing newer fuels in a far more efficient and durable design hence being reusable several times over. The guidance and navigation of the US systems are far superior to anything that the Russian Federation can currently manufacture. You won't find Russian made chipsets and motherboards in any US weapon system. Lol, if only there were reliable Russian made chipsets and motherboards so that the Russian systems didn't have to resort to hijacking American chipsets and to further repurpose such in order to fit their needs. Sadly this results in very inefficient electronic items that do not perform as reliably or as consistently as purpose built chipsets and boards. Which none of Russia's current modernized weapon systems have. The best of Russia's weapons ALL have a little bit of American know how in them in order for them to even work.
@@robertzendejas8349 no seu texto você fala que os motores de foguetes russos são ultrapassados e obsoletos, fala também que os chips, placas-mães, sistemas de navegação e orientações não são confiáveis, mas não se esqueça que os EUA e a Europa Ocidental estão anos luz atrás dos russos em relação a tecnologia dos mísseis hipersonicos, aliás, EUA e a Otan estão sob ameaça direta contra tal arma russa, que até o presente momento, não existe defesa antiaérea para abatê-lo. Se você fala que os EUA são tão superiores assim, porque ainda não conseguiram desenvolver um missel hipersonico totalmente operacional?
You missed important point- Kalibr have jamming system embedded and can destroy air defense missile during flight, particularly it can send self destruction signals to S300 missiles
yes and it always landed to the residential building of the civilian population in Ukraine instead of the military camp. good accuracy damaging non combatance
@@wuillincaesa3842 correctly and some landed to open area some in play ground while children are playing it is so much precised target, the grass are so scared
I don't know anything about either these missiles but I would be willing to bet that the Russian one is cheaper to manufacture and the American one actually works.
Bragging about the Tomahawk battles in Iraq/ Gulf, Afghanistan, Jugoslavia, Syria etc. is not even comparable to Russia`s capabilities .... the war in Ukraine is much more brutal than NATO/US have ever experienced ... just saying
kalibr missiles still can destroy his target even that the enemy have lot of SAM coverage like (s300 , buk m1, strela, IRIS-T, NASAMS ,hawk, gipard, .....)
@@alexkatati4072 Speed and distance help you not, if you can't get the needed parts to produce, or it can't hit the target because it's too easy to shoot down or deflect en route. The better weapon is the one that can be produced in needed numbers, and gets the job done right. The other is just a waste of a lot of money. (Hitting that military objective aids your cause. Hitting that apartment or school building doesn't.)
У калибра в отличие от томагавка есть системы противодействия перехвату и несколько модификации с различными ттх. Калибр может изменять цели на лету, лететь по сложной траектории и изменять ее. В СССР тоже были крылатые ракеты.
@@jolivera8451 The greater range of certain kalibr variants is achieved by doubling the size and weight of this particular missile variant. It’s essentially a new missile and no genius achievement.
@@williamzk9083 regardless it seriously out ranges ours, and that size and weight u mentioned really makes for a way bigger kaboom👌🏼 oh and way cheaper witch will obviously enable Russia to mass produce🤷🏻♂️
Показатель обстрел Дамаска тамогавками, когда из 120 тамогавков долетел 2, а в Киев из 30 долетает 25калибров, и "патриот" не очень помог, а точнее уже 2 комплекс уничтожили
many of them have been shot down over Yugoslavia back in the late 90s. Some even missed the country and hit the country next door landed on some empty houses.. @@TrevorSachko
Accuracy, accuracy, accuracy. If the missile does not hit's its target, how much cheaper it is exponentially goes up if it takes so many more to hopefully hit's intended target. Range? If it can't hit 600km, how does it expect to hit it's fantasy range of 4000km plus? Where are those advanced chips coming from and in what numbers can the Kalibr be launched at. If it can't find it's target, how will it compensate? Someone's arm sales are doing very very badly. The Kalibr can be launched from so many different platforms, each one has that one little consistent problem , if you can't see your target, how are you hoping to ever hit it? Good luck on those arm sales.
Tomahawk -- ecm jamming, nap of earth, and loitering outclass Kalibr 10-1. Although, since Russian could care less how accurate their missiles are it's a draw, a sad comparison.
Buahaha.. clown. Tomahawk indeed missed to destroy Syrian military airforce objects long time ago. Tomahawk is not so accurate, Kalibr can reach thousand kilometers to the target precisely. Keep dreaming, kid.
well how accurate were the over 100 tomahawks missiles fired in syria which were supposed to saturate a single building...??the place had no crater, so I would imagine what happened to the other missiles
well how accurate were the over 100 tomahawks missiles fired in syria which were supposed to saturate a single building...??the place had no crater, so I would imagine what happened to the other missiles
La fábrica de Rusia en su mayoría son Públicas y eso es una gran ventaja porque ellos fabrican a precios de costo de producción y USA sus empresas venden para obtener gran utilidad económica,eso equivale a que USA tenga en stock menor cantidad que Rusia. Ambos países Tienen armas muy parecidas en eficiencia pero no en precios.
Por eso es la dudosa calidad del actual arsenal Ruso pues en si son semi publicas manejada por magnates socio del del mismo gobierno en el cual este lo escoge a dedo y que se dice que hay mucha corrupcion, no hay competencia como tal, en cambio los Gringos es todo lo contrario al ser privadas hay mucha competencia para escoger el mejor producto y garantiza mas la calidad. la competencia es la clave.
@@wilmernino1807 in the Soviet Union there was no competition anywhere at all, and in terms of civilian technology, the Soviet Union was far behind its Western "partners", but not in terms of weapons and missiles. As for corruption, it is always and everywhere, another question is how much it is controlled by the state. if you are engaged in corruption in weapons development in Russia, you are either very stupid or very brave. any weapon developments such as missiles, aircraft, tanks, any serious military equipment are under control as much as possible. they are very closely monitored, first of all, Putin himself controls everything
my vote goes to KALIBR since looking at the video accuracy is the same on both platforms but range and speed of KALIBR is far better then TOMAHAWK plus probably cheaper to produce and it could be launched from variety of vessels.
acctually Russia can not build more Kalibers as most technologie came from west, Many of high tech weopons running low due to not able get needed tech, You can not make a kaliber with wasmachine processors. This was a big mistake using Forien components
@@Noodleanrgry Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, Syria, Serbia, Yemen, Palestine... No response! Blindness! Coup in Ukraine. Nothing. Massacre in Odesa. Nothing. The bombing of Donbas and the tens of thousands killed civilians. Nothing. They banned the Russian language. Guess what happened?! Nothing. No coverage in Western media! One provocation after another.
Дело не в мощности, в точности ,защите от помех,количестве,качестве,надежности,дальности стрельбы и себестоимости.АК-47 тому пример! ЯО только можно сравнивать по мощности!Всем мира и добра!
любите вы русские сея смерть и разрушения в оконцовке желать добра и мира, при этом обращаясь на Вы, и к богу вы обращаетесь с заглавной буквы лицемеры . А до этого вылазиите со своей русской народной сказкой "мы за мир и дружбу между народами" и присказками "мы люди маленькие, не примешивайте всюду политику". Где вы живете? Сейчас везде политика. И ваша верхушка устроила войну при вашей полной поддержке и по Оруеллу спрятались за новоязом - СВО, хлопки, задымления. Желаю вам всего этого
Томагавк рядом не стоит с Калибром, запуски с наших морей по Сирийской территории наглядно показали это, у нас лучшее вооружение, малость люди ослабли..
There could, and most likely will be, an evaluation done in Russia's usage of them in Ukraine, by both sides. The problem for Russia is that they need western parts, parts they can no longer get. This will not only limit production, it will limit advances in capabilities, and more likely mean a degradation. On the other hand, the US can update the Tomahawk any time it sees the need. So for that reason, I'd give the Tomahawk a clear edge. (Doesn't mean the Kalibr isn't a dangerous weapon still, just less of them, and less accurate.)
@@donmarconni And where Russia finds a loophole, a black marketeer, the US shuts them down. There's already been dozens of companies warned that they won't be able to buy in the US anymore. There's been arrests of people done. Sure, there's a lot of bad actors out there, willing to make illegal money. Problem with that is, that at best, Russia can only get a fraction of the needed parts. At the rate Russia can produce, and the rate they are being fired off, soon Russia will have to deplete their strategic reserves. So, don't look to China. China can't exist under a sanctions regime like Russia has, that's why some Chinese companies have pulled out of Russia. EU/US constitutes over 65% of their business, while Russia only about 4%. Russia isn't worth that much to China.
14% of world population is part of western world. Much bigger part of the world is not. In the history, and last 60 year's, with NATO as a main alliance, westerns made lots of enemies in the world, everywhere... China has stronger real economy then USA, Russia more resources then all western world. Do you see any problem in production of anything in Russia?! They produced more weapon in one day, then Nato countrys all together in 15 day's...US dollar, in free world, is staring to be avoided in business.. Russian rublja is never stronger, economy relatively stabil...But inflation in Europe is starting to be really huge...Sanctions to Russia, are actually sanctions for Europeans...How economy of Germany can be concurrent, on the world market with 4 time more expensive gas for protection then Asias had?! Unfortunately, western world will never live a life, what thay lived before..
I think you have to know first that US is even dependent to Russia and China's rare earth metals and chemical and even for their nuclear reactors. You are just trying to cover the truth by simply saying that Russia can't do it alone without the west. Or shall I say, looking down Russia while crying and begging for food and gas from them. If west is too advance, why Russia possessed the most deadliest weapon then? Russia is not a conqueror but still managed to make these weapons for defense. I know, you'll ask me how I call on Ukraine and Russia war but then ask your self why and how it ended up to this war. USSR is gone. Why? Ask US AND NATO. OKAY?
The Tomahawk has over 30 years of proven combat effectiveness, while the Kalibir only appeared in 2012. The Tomahawk has been regularly upgraded and improved and renown for its accuracy, but Russia does not make public the accuracy or reliability of the Kalibr missiles it has fired. Kalibr may not have some of the advanced loitering and interactive data link capabilities of the current Tomahawk, but that might well make it cheaper to mass-produce (in addition to parts commonality with family variants). Tomahawk likely outclasses Kalibr is ECM capability. While Tomahawk’s IV block revision included electronic counter-countermeasures, the Kalibr family is relatively susceptible to jamming techniques. With the modification, Block V Tomahawk has improved its capabilities. Its networking capabilities are beyond that of most operational cruise missiles by a long margin.
Вы не можете судить о ее точности, а утверждаете о том, что калибр слабая реб защита?! Откуда такая информация, это пропаганда? В СССР с конца 50х начало 60 годов уже были крылатые ракеты с прямоточно реактивными двигателями ПВРД, но они тогда так еще не называлась. Название пришло с запада.
@@MalderFox Russian military equipment is terrible…. Great propaganda but none if performs well in the field especially with poorly trained Russian soldiers.
@@Brian-px9gulol. well, how did they first fly into space? This is probably also propaganda. also do they have the most advanced nuclear technology, which is also the most non-working? what I know about the Russians, they keep all high technologies a secret, and everything that does not work is propaganda. answer me the question why the American space program uses Russian RD rocket engines? simple question. or are you a bot?
Без соответствующей орбитальной поддержки применение дальнобойных ракет, особенно гипперзвукового класса, невозможно! Применение наземных датчиков коректировки полета и целеуказания не всегда возможно! Используйте Небеса Богов! Человеки называют это Космос! Демократию следует защитить силой оружия! В этой ситуации окрепшее и атакующее зло отступает или погибнет! Желаю всем Нам Удачки!
In general, all stands indicate that the range of the 'caliber' missile = 2500
kilometers! why are you deceiving the audience? you simply indicated the distance from the Caspian Sea to Syria is 1500 kilometers. and for that matter, in Russia, even under the USSR, there were long-range ship-based missiles, and it’s strange to hear that only the USA and Britain had this.
A Caliber missile tested by Algeria from a Kilo submarine hit a target with high accuracy, documented on video of its hitting the target
You perfectly explain and judge without bias, you are the first American person I came across with this quality....keep it up
He leaves it for you to make the decision. And to me, it is obvious that the tomahawk is better. It is more connected, has loitering capabilities, and is less susceptible to countermeasures.
Agree. Americans are VERY biased and rarely see longer than their own noses.
@@jiminauburn5073 ask ukrainians
@@Krkovic100 Ukrainians have not been hit by Tomahawks. They have nothing to compare the Kalibr missiles to. Wouldn't you think if they both have about the same accuracy, the same range, the same payload, that the one that is harder to jam, that can have its target changed in flight, that is more connected, and can loiter, would be the superior one?
@@PpAirO5 In fact, the Russians and most of the world are biased and vindictive to the American people, which is why they don't like anyone in America.
until 2015, the fact that only the USA and Great Britain had long-range cruise missiles could only or from someone who does not know about Soviet and Russian weapons. In the USSR, cruise missiles appeared earlier than in the USA, and in the 70-80s the USSR already had cruise missiles with a range of 3000 and 5000 kilometers (December 9, 1976, the Decree of the Council of Ministers of the USSR was issued on the development of a universal strategic supersonic cruise missile 3M-25 "Meteorite" with a flight range of about 5000 kilometers. The rocket was supposed to become universal and get the ability to launch both from the sea - "Meteorit-M", and from aviation - "Meteorite-A" carriers. The rocket exists) , the caliber also did not appear in the 2000s, its ancestors are different modifications of the calibers of the 70-80s with a range of 3000 kilometers one of his ancestors is a unique ancestor - the S-10 Granat missile system with a long-range cruise missile KS-122 (3M10) equipped with a nuclear warhead. with a range of 2500 kilometers.
The missiles of the Caliber family were created on the basis of two projects: the 3M10 strategic nuclear cruise missile with a combat radius of 2500 km developed during the period from 1975 to 1984 at the Novator Design Bureau and the competition of anti-ship missiles Alfa (R&D "Turquoise").
Initially, only the Yakhont supersonic anti-ship missile took part in the Biryuza R&D competition, but its development was delayed, and the rocket came out expensive. At the same time, the 3M10 project had problems due to the planned Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty. And the Novator Design Bureau, on its own initiative, in 1986, a non-nuclear version of the naval version of the KS-122 missile was proposed for competition, however, it did not suit the selection committee because of the subsonic attack speed. Work continued, and in 1990 a finished version appeared with a supersonic finish booster to overcome enemy defense systems. However, the beginning of the collapse of the USSR suspended the introduction of this product.
Also, in parallel, the development of an anti-submarine complex based on the KS-122 was carried out to replace the bulky and obsolete Vodopad and Rastrub-B complexes. The first version of the rocket in this direction was presented in 1997.
The Kalibr family rockets were first presented to the general public at MAKS-93.
The Russian Navy is armed with the Kalibr missile system. According to open sources, the maximum firing range of the 3M14 cruise missile from the composition of this complex, flying at subsonic speed, reaches about 2 thousand km. A variant of the Caliber-NK complex has been developed for surface ships, and the Caliber-PL complex has been developed for submarines. In particular, Russian frigates of project 22350, corvettes of project 21631 Buyan-M, multi-purpose nuclear submarines of project 885 Yasen, non-nuclear submarines of projects 877 and 636.3, and other ships are armed with Caliber.
On January 8, 2018, there were reports in the media about the start of work on the development of a modified version of the Caliber-M missile. According to a source, “The latest high-precision ship-based Caliber-M cruise missile with a maximum firing range of more than 4,500 km is being developed for the Navy.
( Today Caliber is much better than Tamogawk.Therefore, autumn is stupid to believe that Russia does not have long-range missiles until 2015. Russia has cruise missiles with a range of 5,500 kilometers, both sea and air based. Various modifications of Caliber also have a range of 300 to 4500 kilometers.
Therefore, your data on the range of 1500 kilometers is not correct. the maximum range of one of the modifications is 4500 kilometers, the range of calibers used in Syria is 2500 kilometers.
Today in Ukraine, various export-type modifications are used, cheap up to 300 kilometers and more expensive up to 2500, the same as in Syria, as well as Iskander strategic missiles up to 550 kilometers (cruised and ballistic), and Onyxes with a range of 550 kilometers as well, and also air-based
Yeah you don't know anything about the USSR.
Now from 2023, Australia, a third country will have 220+ latest gen Tomahawk cruise missiles as part of the AUZUS agreement.
Yes but cnn didn’t talk about that, but they did about calibr that’s why we all know about it😉
Yeah like the Su-57 and the T-14, all superior weapons right? Dear comrade, russian forces and weapons are joke 😂😂😂
@@jha77jha77 You're a fool . Su57 showed well in a real situation, unlike the Western f22, which did not participate in one conflict because it was crap and f35, which has more than 700 malfunctions so far🤣🤣🤣
And by the way, the su 57 is mass-produced. as for the T14, there is no need for it, with the assumption that the T90 is the best tank of competitors that has no competitors in the west, while it is cheaper than any
En ucrania los kalibr han entrado impunemente venciendo a lo mejor de los sistemas de detección e interceptación de la otan. En cambio, los Tomahawk no han Sido probados contra ejércitos verdaderos, con sistemas y armamentos modernos
Как это не испытывались, конфликт буря в пустыне 1991 года именно тогда американские крылатые ракеты отлично себя зарекомендовали. Российский калибр это всего лишь копия американского "томагавка", причем плохая копия.
Томагавки были выпущены по сирии 60 шт. долетели только 12шт.
@@planetaplan440 ты сам считал.
@@alekxalekxandrow3451
Википедию почитай. Удар коалиции по сирии 2018г.
Пишут с томагавками и ракетами воздушного базирования было запущено 105 ракет.
105 ракет по центру киеву, что бы там было?
The one that is cheaper and easiest to produce is the most powerful
Thats nonsense. If you don't hit your target, your power level is 0. If your missile gets jammed, your power level is 0. If your missile gets intercepted, your power level is 0. And 0 is certainly not "the most powerfull".
Богатые и развитые страны могут позволить себе иметь дорогое оружие премиум класса.
@caimingliang yeah buddy
@@IsaoTakahata578No one can afford expensive weapons.
@@Micha-qv5ufthe only winners are the weapons manufacturers and congress.
According to RUSI in three month the russian has fired more cruise missles than the US produced tomahawks for over 10 Years.
I remember how Russia planned to take Ukraine in a matter of 3 days to a maximum of 3 weeks.
@@walterrivera2183 that was the claim of the West russia dient say that because They know that the Ukraine has the strongest Arms in Europe.They has More Field Artillerie than the US.
@@walterrivera2183 That's your foolish CIA's claim 😂🤣🤣
@@walterrivera2183 ข่าวที่เขียนมาจากไหน555 เดินทางยังไม่ได้เลย555ขำๆๆ
@@walterrivera2183 that was all bs coming from US dod and the grandpas who are hosted in media stations as russian experts
It's the one that costs less and does 90 percent of the work. Just facts of life. Deal with it.
How can it be better when it doesn't do 100% of the job and can be easily jammed? You are the one who doesn't want to deal with reality. You are coping, hard!
Somewhat a balanced comparison from an american channel. Bravo!
While balancing is pretty good but not good enough because the truth is way more important. God told me that Russian missiles (both offense and defense system) are far more advanced. If the war to break out between these two nations (NATO included) the U.S. stands no chance against Russia, both conventional and nuclear.. God also told me that Russia, North Korea, and Iran have been reserved and preserved for a thousand years to punish America and her western allies that follow the same sinful lifestyle.. The only way to calm Russia and her allies down is for the public to repent.
@@rockefelleragent1357 🤣🤣🤣
God joking
@@rockefelleragent1357put the pipe down bucko Russia can’t even defeat Ukraine 🇺🇦 a country 1/4 it’s size 🤡
У ХОХЛОВ САМЫЕ ЛУЧШИЕ РАКЕТЫ ЗИПУН ИЗ С 200 ПЕРЕДЕЛАНЫ
@@rockefelleragent1357 You are nuts. Get help.
what matters to me is accuracy and its ability to hit the target while avoiding counter measures in high percentage.
at syria from 20 tomahowk 18 missed the traget because russian jammers and teh last two destroyed by s300. just outdated.
Agree.
@@makoado6010 source?
@@bukanpahlawan902 links removed by youtube... so goole it
@@makoado6010 keyword?
Обзор достоин уважения за честность и непредвзятый взгляд на обе ракеты. Действительно пока сложно сказать какая из них лучше, но, в любом случае, отсутствие утверждений в стиле "это лучше, просто потому, что это наше" добавляет симпатии автору.
Ещё томагавк никогда не работал в условиях серьезного противодействия современных пво.
@@kto_to_tam911 Работал
@@Lenz.93 Пример
Украина вернется в границьі 91го года, нравится єто вам, русакам, или нет.
@@TonsOFDamage хорошо, только начало 91-го 😁
Калибр это целое семейство крылатых ракет с разными характеристиками.
Muy bonito el Barquito...una joya de ingeniería...pero cuando se ponga "gordo el asunto" entre Yankees y el Oso Siberiano,Pero será "PAN COMIDO ", Para los misiles Iskander,Khinzal, Ónix,S-350, o los misiles Ipersonicos Kalibr ...Son una chulada tecnológica
nice video 👍
Thank you 👍
US has tomahawk and how many different type of cruise missiles Russia got ? Kinda answers that dilemma. And if you think Russia running out then look what they fired in Ukraine so far and Vostok last month ( biggest military exercises seen since ww2) which fires Armageddon in barrages .
Oh dear, another total mudflap.
Sorry Russian bot, your terrible grammar makes no sense , I know all you Russians have little man syndrome
@@TKUA11 you know exactly what I put and am British as far back the crusades, nice try though. Dunno why you think am little either ? Ha ha ha . You bitch about my grammar and yours is probably worse than mine
@@gregchijoff9959 And idiots will never run out of horseshit to talk...
И сколько в Сирии ушло
power is nothing without precision.
для ядерной боеголовки не так важно
@@v0vab0b Так же, как Россия не смеет стрелять, потому что знает, что ее ждет.
@@chariesbergero9662 "не смеет стрелять" - с каких пор попрошайки рассказываю кто что смеет?) Твой обкеканый блок, куда вы так стремитесь, спрашивает разрешение постоянно
@@chariesbergero9662 u.p.d хохла с далека видно
@@chariesbergero9662 трусики уже раздали кружевные или пока нет?))
Kalibr Missile series are promising and more cheaper, more range....
While Tomahawk Missile is old and too expensive, lower range and more susceptible to electronic warfare jamming that it was reported in their Syrian campaign while their bombarding ISIS and Assad's bases simultaneously that they must cross the radar defense of Russian bases in Syria.... Only a handful of block 4 Tomahawk Cruise missiles are capable of the current modern warfare.... If block 5 is successful they must add a bit more range to have a comparable range against old Kalibr Cruise missiles of Russia that are 4k+ km range
Калибр быстрей! Дальность полета выше! Ну и самое главное-мощней
@@Headhear Десять штук в мес. это тираж достаточны в военное время ? Да и одна ракета , будь она и лучшая не решает исход войны. Войну побеждает армия со всем комплексом вооружения и выучки.
Garbage. With 2300+ combat firings, no Tomahawk was ever shot down.... or jammed. Oh, jamming is pretty much a BS story made up by vodka swilling katsaps to make the fan boys moist.
Considering the fail rate of Kalibr in Ukraine I would say that the Tomahawk is better in EW protected areas. The range for Kalibr is unknown but iit is very hard to believe that the Kalibr-M will have that long of a range. For the other Kalibr variants the Tomahawks have advantage in range
@@napobg6842 In any case, Russia is lagging behind in military developments. If they have done anything similar to Tomogawk, they are lagging behind in dozens of other areas. One missile, even the best one, does not decide the outcome of the war.
We know what the US can do but we don't know what Russia can do. The best option is to avoid things that trigger war
И че может сделать США рабомбить очередную ближневосточную страну, воевать против пастухов и коз?
Question for Americans, why USA attacked former Yugoslawia???
I also ask myself same question every day.
Kalibr has shown his strength in Ukraine, they completely destroyed Ukrainian infrastructures for months now
ukrain destroyed them with patriot
Yea, great succsess for russia 😅
@@simonsymo5361 Yes we have seen the video where Patriots shell out 30 missiles that's around $150 million and yet gets destroyed. They first banned Russian media from TH-cam and then you can only rely on one sided information which is biased.
@@simonsymo5361 чугунная авиабомба времен Второй Мировой войны не является крылатой ракетой «Калибр». Украинская сторона не предъявила ни одного доказательства перехвата Калибра
Tomhawk is the real deal accuracy n changing the course of direction of the target,heat seaker n it can maintain moving over head until u get the choice of hit
En el último ataque masivo con misiles tomahawks que hizo EE UU contra Siria, la defensa electrónica suministrada por Rusia provocó que estos misiles cayeran como moscas sobre las arenas sirias como moscas inermes.....ya Rusia ni los recogía para estudiarlos....
Там особо уже изучать нечего, интерес представляют последние модификации томагавков. Томагавки это старые ракеты, против современных средств противодействия РЭБ и ПВО они бесполезны.
Puerto Rico te lo confirmó,!!!!!!
😂
Tomahawk บินได้ไม่เท่า Kalibre ทั้งระยะทางและความเร็ว เอามาเปรียบกันคงสู้กันไม่ได้มั้ง
Tomahawk have more speed and range man...
Calibers even flew from the territory of Russia to Syria the destruction of ISIS
America at least has something to compare with Kalibre but I wonder if they have any to compare to Kinzhal, zircon or avangard all deployed and some used.
Yes Aim 183 Hypersonic missile aircraft
@@deanbrown2061 only that? plus,it still on testing phase and by the time that its handed on the US military, Russia will develop more powerful ones.
Why is the war not over then? Russia is trash. Deal with it.
@Tyson S that's because we haven't given them the weapons they really need. we're trying to stop this thing and become a stalemate like North and South Korea.
Raytheon Technologies has also successfully test-fired a hypersonic missile. With our defense budget, it won't be long before we overtake them.
The one that is actually built and in great supply!
The difference is that the US cannot intercept the fast flying Kalibr, while the slow moving Tomahawk is an easy target to intercept with Russian SAMS
So then can you explain why after more than 2300 firings, no Tomahawk has been shot down and yet sunflower farmers in Ukraine have lost count of how many kalibr's they have destroyed... Brains all in your butt?
Doubt thats true. mach 3 is not that fast.
Yeah right 😂😂😂😂 thats why the kalibr in ukraine are shor down by the german systems
Kalibr is subsonic, with possible exception of the end spurt
Totally agree with you.
Syria showed it good.
Tomahawks were intercepted pretty easy by Pansir, tor, s200 and buk..
I saw an exhibition from Moscow of these Tomahawks with serial # from Syria.
I'm going to say that both systems are pretty good!
God told me that Russian Kalibr missiles are far more capable and is superior to the U.S. Tomahawk missiles. That was one of the reasons how Russia saved Syria so quickly from being taken over by the U.S.
Both systems are pretty catastrophic! There, I corrected this for you 🤗
No more discussion Only Iranian missiles and then nothing,😂
В СИРИИ ТАМОГАВКИ ОБО СЬ
Two thousand Tomhwak missile have gone into drain after attack on Syria. Russia have collected unexploded Tomhwak missile from Syria.
Source: trust me bro
🤡🤡
Source:" mis webos toreros"
Hey, that’s great.🙄
Después de lo visto últimamente en la guerra de Ucrania no hay posibilidad de comparación ya que los misiles Rusos están muy por encima en tecnología. También vimos fracasar a los Tomahawk en Siria donde la mayoría fueron inutilizados por Rusia. Por no hablar de las capacidades hipersonicas de Rusia, donde Estados Unidos no solo se quedó atras, sino que no dispone de esa tecnología y de las armas hipersonicas que ya tiene Rusia, China o incluso Irán. Basar el desarrollo militar en tener bases por todo el planeta, en los obsoletos portaviones, o en el fallido F35 ha echo retrasar a Estados Unidos, gastar todos sus recursos al basarse su poderío en armas obsoletas como los mencionados portaaviones, los sistemas patriot que también fracasaron en Ucrania ante los misiles hipersonicos rusos kinzal, o los también obsoletos Tomahawk, ha echo que solo puedan ser efectivos contra Naciones debiles o indefensas. Contra potencias como Rusia ya hemos comprobado que están bastante atrás
Самая мощная "Буревестник", с не ограниченной дальностью и ядерной боеголовкой.
X-22(Kh-22) destroyed the Patriot air defense system! Against the X-47 M2 (Kh-47 M2), this complex is generally powerless, the Patriot air defense system would not even be able to produce one shot if it were the target!
What ever makes you feel better 😂
Déjate de darle duro al alcohol,!!
Товарищи, вы перезаписали видио?
У вас 2 года назад выходил этот материал
I am Super afraid and shock of both US and Russia Tomahawk and Kalibr cruise missiles.
to be fair next should be comparing RK55/SS-N-21 to harpoon.
Quem fabrica o excelente S-400, fabrica também o ótimo Kalibr.
It doesn't matter who make them, they're trash compared to some others
Да русские ракеты первые полетели в космос и сейчас они лучшие
@@inaina3674 a Rússia detém o domínio completo na tecnologia dos mísseis.
Durante muito tempo, o único meio de se chegar a Estação Espacial Internacional, era através da nave russa
@Helton there's a big difference between missile dominance and being the only one manufacturing rocket engines. For whatever reasons our governmental entities preferred to farm out the manufacturing of the rocket engines to Russia. You're kidding yourself if you really think it's because that was beyond our engineering capability.
It was a favor to the Russian aerospace tech sector, and it was convenient for the US.
Musk looked over the numbers and saw that Russia was overcharging by a considerable amount for it's 1980's era rocket engine designs read: obsolete/inefficient. The Russian engines were disposable for a reason.
Thus he was able to introduce a modern state of the art engine design utilizing newer fuels in a far more efficient and durable design hence being reusable several times over.
The guidance and navigation of the US systems are far superior to anything that the Russian Federation can currently manufacture. You won't find Russian made chipsets and motherboards in any US weapon system. Lol, if only there were reliable Russian made chipsets and motherboards so that the Russian systems didn't have to resort to hijacking American chipsets and to further repurpose such in order to fit their needs.
Sadly this results in very inefficient electronic items that do not perform as reliably or as consistently as purpose built chipsets and boards. Which none of Russia's current modernized weapon systems have.
The best of Russia's weapons ALL have a little bit of American know how in them in order for them to even work.
@@robertzendejas8349 no seu texto você fala que os motores de foguetes russos são ultrapassados e obsoletos, fala também que os chips, placas-mães, sistemas de navegação e orientações não são confiáveis, mas não se esqueça que os EUA e a Europa Ocidental estão anos luz atrás dos russos em relação a tecnologia dos mísseis hipersonicos, aliás, EUA e a Otan estão sob ameaça direta contra tal arma russa, que até o presente momento, não existe defesa antiaérea para abatê-lo. Se você fala que os EUA são tão superiores assim, porque ainda não conseguiram desenvolver um missel hipersonico totalmente operacional?
Эти ракеты примерно равны, но у США их на кораблях более 7000 штук, вот в чём проблема
You missed important point- Kalibr have jamming system embedded and can destroy air defense missile during flight, particularly it can send self destruction signals to S300 missiles
yes and it always landed to the residential building of the civilian population in Ukraine instead of the military camp. good accuracy damaging non combatance
@@ttkitah9627 incredulous even the rats know what happened in the exploded buildings
@@wuillincaesa3842 correctly and some landed to open area some in play ground while children are playing it is so much precised target, the grass are so scared
@@ttkitah9627 🤣🤣🤣😁😅😅
@@ttkitah9627 😅😅😁😁🤣🤣
Над атаками томогавков в Сирии ржал весь мир. Там они во всей "красе" предстали.
I don't know anything about either these missiles but I would be willing to bet that the Russian one is cheaper to manufacture and the American one actually works.
А как же в Алеппо, из 64 томагавков долетели только 12, или это другое?
Bragging about the Tomahawk battles in Iraq/ Gulf, Afghanistan, Jugoslavia, Syria etc. is not even comparable to Russia`s capabilities .... the war in Ukraine is much more brutal than NATO/US have ever experienced ... just saying
kalibr missiles still can destroy his target even that the enemy have lot of SAM coverage like (s300 , buk m1, strela, IRIS-T, NASAMS ,hawk, gipard, .....)
both are the same.. the russian one is $1 MM and the US one is $20 MM per pop.
So buying 20 kalibr is better than buying a tomahawk
@@kamalchandramoney3541 cheaper and as effective
They are not the same, listen to their capabilities.
Nope! The latest block 5 Tomahawk costs 2m not 20!
@@napobg6842 Where did you see any new weapon systems ever gotten cheaper. Never happens
Isnt the Russian one hyper sonic?
Калибр как Месси- ему больше нечего доказывать
Скорее, ГАМНЕССИ)))
Хуй..ня все эти калибры, по Украине уже их столько выпустили, а толку ноль, это они могут только с полуплеменными государствами себя так смело вести.
@@Прохожий-к4е так точно, при подлете ракеты у встречающих откладывается кал
Stop showing flames coming out of the tail during the cruise phase. Jet engines not rockets.
It's the boost phase to get them up to speed so they can fly, like a runway for an aircraft.
from a channel named "US military power" don't expect to get a truthful comparison
It’s hilarious eh, “kalibra has triple the range”, but fails lol😂 not biased at all😂
I like the way you explain good job bra
I used to think cruise missiles were a "push button I win weapon" but seeing Ukrainians shooting these down with mpads, changed my mind.
Скинь видео)
Russia caliber cruise missile is far better than any missile specially in terms of speed & distance
@@alexkatati4072 Speed and distance help you not, if you can't get the needed parts to produce, or it can't hit the target because it's too easy to shoot down or deflect en route. The better weapon is the one that can be produced in needed numbers, and gets the job done right. The other is just a waste of a lot of money. (Hitting that military objective aids your cause. Hitting that apartment or school building doesn't.)
Are u delusional ? Where and who told u ukranians used to watch the mpads shoot a calibr missle down?
@@claudiohysi9203 the owner of the channel can post some vids if he wants, or look it up on YT
AA gunners were making bets in Yugoslavia, who's gonna down more Tomahawk, they used 12.7 quad guns from WW2, easily shooting down slow large targets!
Тоже обожаю Рен ТВ
And now S Korea Japan and the Philippines all have 400 tomahawk each... sounds like china is pooping..
У калибра в отличие от томагавка есть системы противодействия перехвату и несколько модификации с различными ттх. Калибр может изменять цели на лету, лететь по сложной траектории и изменять ее. В СССР тоже были крылатые ракеты.
Also much better range than tomahawk.. big difference
@@jolivera8451 The greater range of certain kalibr variants is achieved by doubling the size and weight of this particular missile variant. It’s essentially a new missile and no genius achievement.
@@williamzk9083 regardless it seriously out ranges ours, and that size and weight u mentioned really makes for a way bigger kaboom👌🏼 oh and way cheaper witch will obviously enable Russia to mass produce🤷🏻♂️
And has the downing rate of 80+%. That's quite useless.
@@madcalm2024 according to whom? Useless?
Tomahawks fly at somewhat lower altitudes which gives them better survivability
Survivability is 100% so far, cant say much for the joke called kalibr...
@@TrevorSachko the Syrians say otherwise
Показатель обстрел Дамаска тамогавками, когда из 120 тамогавков долетел 2, а в Киев из 30 долетает 25калибров, и "патриот" не очень помог, а точнее уже 2 комплекс уничтожили
Syrian lies about everything
many of them have been shot down over Yugoslavia back in the late 90s. Some even missed the country and hit the country next door landed on some empty houses.. @@TrevorSachko
Если честно, я удивлён довольно непредвзятому обзору со стороны Американского канала.
Это же не российский канал, где всегда хвалят свое и хают других, называя свое вооружение "аналогов нет"
@FM - Free Music - Royalty Free Trap после того как пару раз прилетели кинжалы а у них даже сирена не сработала, уже не говорят.
Accuracy, accuracy, accuracy. If the missile does not hit's its target, how much cheaper it is exponentially goes up if it takes so many more to hopefully hit's intended target. Range? If it can't hit 600km, how does it expect to hit it's fantasy range of 4000km plus? Where are those advanced chips coming from and in what numbers can the Kalibr be launched at. If it can't find it's target, how will it compensate? Someone's arm sales are doing very very badly. The Kalibr can be launched from so many different platforms, each one has that one little consistent problem , if you can't see your target, how are you hoping to ever hit it? Good luck on those arm sales.
Ты должен и дальше продолжать в это верить. Нам так нужно.
In its short 239-year history, the U.S. has unleashed 209 wars and armed conflicts.
Umm, something an imbecile would say?
Tomahawk -- ecm jamming, nap of earth, and loitering outclass Kalibr 10-1. Although, since Russian could care less how accurate their missiles are it's a draw, a sad comparison.
Buahaha.. clown. Tomahawk indeed missed to destroy Syrian military airforce objects long time ago. Tomahawk is not so accurate, Kalibr can reach thousand kilometers to the target precisely.
Keep dreaming, kid.
well how accurate were the over 100 tomahawks missiles fired in syria which were supposed to saturate a single building...??the place had no crater, so I would imagine what happened to the other missiles
@@briant5685 😆
@@briant5685 🤣
You have data of Russian Earth mapping? Share with us.
Kaliber does not need ECM jamming, lol
Are these the missiles Ukraine keep shooting down?
🤣🤣👍👍
Yeah
Russia fires 60, Ukraine shot down 80 58 hit their targets
@@Ese_osa 😂👍
well how accurate were the over 100 tomahawks missiles fired in syria which were supposed to saturate a single building...??the place had no crater, so I would imagine what happened to the other missiles
Забыл написать, что калибры забиваются тапками.
Indian Supersonic cruise missile BRAMHOS is the most powerfull cruise missile in the world
you must be kidding me.
The one that has the highest hit rate,
Caliber 🔥💪
S400 KALIBER 🥰
S400 is not Kalibr. S400 is an air defense system
Both are very good....first strike capability is what counts.......
As an inhabitant of city that was recently shelled by rockets, it's better to say that both are VERY BAD. The same about people who launch them
Kaliber is better than cruise missile
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
En siria se demostró q.los kaliber s9n 100% exactos y mejores
30 лет работает Томогавк?
С 2015 по 2023 год Россия выпустила больше Калибров чем США выпустили Томогавков за всю свою историю.
Appreciate this point. America has had missiles for years. But only Russia struck the terrorists. That's all there is to know about the Western world.
La fábrica de Rusia en su mayoría son Públicas y eso es una gran ventaja porque ellos fabrican a precios de costo de producción y USA sus empresas venden para obtener gran utilidad económica,eso equivale a que USA tenga en stock menor cantidad que Rusia. Ambos países Tienen armas muy parecidas en eficiencia pero no en precios.
Все наоборот)
Por eso es la dudosa calidad del actual arsenal Ruso pues en si son semi publicas manejada por magnates socio del del mismo gobierno en el cual este lo escoge a dedo y que se dice que hay mucha corrupcion, no hay competencia como tal, en cambio los Gringos es todo lo contrario al ser privadas hay mucha competencia para escoger el mejor producto y garantiza mas la calidad. la competencia es la clave.
@@wilmernino1807 in the Soviet Union there was no competition anywhere at all, and in terms of civilian technology, the Soviet Union was far behind its Western "partners", but not in terms of weapons and missiles. As for corruption, it is always and everywhere, another question is how much it is controlled by the state. if you are engaged in corruption in weapons development in Russia, you are either very stupid or very brave. any weapon developments such as missiles, aircraft, tanks, any serious military equipment are under control as much as possible. they are very closely monitored, first of all, Putin himself controls everything
@@ingspektr6511 source: Believe me bro 👍🏻
😂🤣😂🤣🤡🤡
как тут сравнишь то. нету точных данных ни по одному из объектов сравнения.
9 минут отчем то рассказывать,что бы в конце концов заявить,что мало данных,что бы можно было сделать сравнение-кто лучше...!
Another point to note is that Kalibr is currently Kaliberating Ukrainian infrastructure.
Civilian infrastructure*
“Kaliberating”😅
@@nerboychannel5188 военная инфраструктура
Вы хотите откалибровать?
Да.
Кроме качества ракеты важно еще и возможность ее массового производства. И это есть главная проблема ВПК РФ.
Gde problema?
@@gde-to-kogda-to6130 В Путинской власти.
Кто то мухлует, на счет дальности и скорости ракет.
my vote goes to KALIBR since looking at the video accuracy is the same on both platforms but range and speed of KALIBR is far better then TOMAHAWK plus probably cheaper to produce and it could be launched from variety of vessels.
acctually Russia can not build more Kalibers as most technologie came from west, Many of high tech weopons running low due to not able get needed tech, You can not make a kaliber with wasmachine processors. This was a big mistake using Forien components
@@Noodleanrgry
hahahahahahahaha
ahh Westerners
They are like children. Believe in anything their media represent them!
@@Noodleanrgry калибры ещё в марте 2022 года закончились же)))
@@ncc1701218 no that are russian who believe anything media tells them? and i am not even western
@@Noodleanrgry
Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, Syria, Serbia, Yemen, Palestine...
No response! Blindness!
Coup in Ukraine. Nothing.
Massacre in Odesa. Nothing.
The bombing of Donbas and the tens of thousands killed civilians. Nothing.
They banned the Russian language. Guess what happened?! Nothing.
No coverage in Western media!
One provocation after another.
Each uses between 100 to 120 troy ounces in there construction, so where do you think the price of Silver is going
Дело не в мощности, в точности ,защите от помех,количестве,качестве,надежности,дальности стрельбы и себестоимости.АК-47 тому пример! ЯО только можно сравнивать по мощности!Всем мира и добра!
любите вы русские сея смерть и разрушения в оконцовке желать добра и мира, при этом обращаясь на Вы, и к богу вы обращаетесь с заглавной буквы лицемеры . А до этого вылазиите со своей русской народной сказкой "мы за мир и дружбу между народами" и присказками "мы люди маленькие, не примешивайте всюду политику". Где вы живете? Сейчас везде политика. И ваша верхушка устроила войну при вашей полной поддержке и по Оруеллу спрятались за новоязом - СВО, хлопки, задымления. Желаю вам всего этого
@@qazanbasik5447 это тебе к США.Они во всем мире сеют хаос, устраивают революции и войны по всему миру!
Who was copy ?
Русское оружие всегда дешевле англосакского, но эффективность всегда выше.
Аха-ха-ха-ха, никчемная жизнь рускаго валенка ничего не стоит, потому и все войны проиграли 🙂
الشعوب اللي تعرف الصواريخ هذه هي اللي تنجم قدم نفسه
The most powerful is the one ho reach his target.
If you're on the wrong end of either of them, it's a bad day!
Kalibr the best
Томагавк рядом не стоит с Калибром, запуски с наших морей по Сирийской территории наглядно показали это, у нас лучшее вооружение, малость люди ослабли..
We'll find out soon 😉
can you make music louder? cant hear it
Rusia have hipersonics zircón
Rusia has big propaganda
@@animals7473 😂😂😂 хохли педики
GPS guidance on Kalibr? Thought Russians are using Glonass
They refuse to use it even on their own jets
How Old is this video? We have all seen how Russian Equipment performs in Ukraine. It is Over Hyped Rubbish.
You guys are good.
томогавков больше поэтому в данный момент у них преимущество , война показала что количество важнее
I find both very similar and precise
you dont even know what your on about!! YOU NEED TO SIT DOWN THE BIG BOYS ARE HERE NOW......ppppfffTTT
Watch out the Russian bots will get triggered
There could, and most likely will be, an evaluation done in Russia's usage of them in Ukraine, by both sides. The problem for Russia is that they need western parts, parts they can no longer get. This will not only limit production, it will limit advances in capabilities, and more likely mean a degradation. On the other hand, the US can update the Tomahawk any time it sees the need. So for that reason, I'd give the Tomahawk a clear edge. (Doesn't mean the Kalibr isn't a dangerous weapon still, just less of them, and less accurate.)
It's not true... Russians are baying missed parts from eastern countries...
@@donmarconni And where Russia finds a loophole, a black marketeer, the US shuts them down. There's already been dozens of companies warned that they won't be able to buy in the US anymore. There's been arrests of people done. Sure, there's a lot of bad actors out there, willing to make illegal money. Problem with that is, that at best, Russia can only get a fraction of the needed parts. At the rate Russia can produce, and the rate they are being fired off, soon Russia will have to deplete their strategic reserves. So, don't look to China. China can't exist under a sanctions regime like Russia has, that's why some Chinese companies have pulled out of Russia. EU/US constitutes over 65% of their business, while Russia only about 4%. Russia isn't worth that much to China.
14% of world population is part of western world. Much bigger part of the world is not. In the history, and last 60 year's, with NATO as a main alliance, westerns made lots of enemies in the world, everywhere... China has stronger real economy then USA, Russia more resources then all western world.
Do you see any problem in production of anything in Russia?! They produced more weapon in one day, then Nato countrys all together in 15 day's...US dollar, in free world, is staring to be avoided in business.. Russian rublja is never stronger, economy relatively stabil...But inflation in Europe is starting to be really huge...Sanctions to Russia, are actually sanctions for Europeans...How economy of Germany can be concurrent, on the world market with 4 time more expensive gas for protection then Asias had?!
Unfortunately, western world will never live a life, what thay lived before..
😂😂😂😂😂 story
I think you have to know first that US is even dependent to Russia and China's rare earth metals and chemical and even for their nuclear reactors. You are just trying to cover the truth by simply saying that Russia can't do it alone without the west. Or shall I say, looking down Russia while crying and begging for food and gas from them. If west is too advance, why Russia possessed the most deadliest weapon then? Russia is not a conqueror but still managed to make these weapons for defense. I know, you'll ask me how I call on Ukraine and Russia war but then ask your self why and how it ended up to this war. USSR is gone. Why? Ask US AND NATO. OKAY?
Awant to reminding u all that no one can defeat Russia.
🤡
@@Vince-jv7tf 🖕
Mass produced kalibr 😅 with what chips?
Billion divided by Million Calculator
Octillion, 27. Nonillion, 30. Decillion, 33. Undecillion, 36. Duodecillion, 39. Tredecillion, 42. Quatttuor-decillion, 45. Quindecillion
As armas Russas sempre foram melhores e mais eficientes e eficazes.
Keep dreaming. Is that why they can’t take over a smaller country like Ukraine when they even have more machines to fight with?
💯%
Tão eficiente que na segunda guerra teve que depender da ajuda e das armas americanas pra vencer os alemães.
@@sandrosqn сказал итальянец😆🤣
Russian weapons are only good on paper, but in fact they are a little modernized Soviet *****
Russia's Kalibr has been test with perfect results
As were the S-400s. Perfect every time. Only had one problem, they couldn't see the targets. otherwise they were spot on.
The Tomahawk has over 30 years of proven combat effectiveness, while the Kalibir only appeared in 2012. The Tomahawk has been regularly upgraded and improved and renown for its accuracy, but Russia does not make public the accuracy or reliability of the Kalibr missiles it has fired. Kalibr may not have some of the advanced loitering and interactive data link capabilities of the current Tomahawk, but that might well make it cheaper to mass-produce (in addition to parts commonality with family variants).
Tomahawk likely outclasses Kalibr is ECM capability. While Tomahawk’s IV block revision included electronic counter-countermeasures, the Kalibr family is relatively susceptible to jamming techniques. With the modification, Block V Tomahawk has improved its capabilities. Its networking capabilities are beyond that of most operational cruise missiles by a long margin.
Вы не можете судить о ее точности, а утверждаете о том, что калибр слабая реб защита?! Откуда такая информация, это пропаганда? В СССР с конца 50х начало 60 годов уже были крылатые ракеты с прямоточно реактивными двигателями ПВРД, но они тогда так еще не называлась. Название пришло с запада.
@@MalderFox Russian military equipment is terrible…. Great propaganda but none if performs well in the field especially with poorly trained Russian soldiers.
@@Brian-px9gulol. well, how did they first fly into space? This is probably also propaganda. also do they have the most advanced nuclear technology, which is also the most non-working? what I know about the Russians, they keep all high technologies a secret, and everything that does not work is propaganda. answer me the question why the American space program uses Russian RD rocket engines? simple question. or are you a bot?
Proven combat effectiveness against inferior armed forces… now that’s what I call an indisputable claim. Bravo!
@@gwarlow = Russian shill.
Без соответствующей орбитальной поддержки применение дальнобойных ракет, особенно гипперзвукового класса, невозможно! Применение наземных датчиков коректировки полета и целеуказания не всегда возможно! Используйте Небеса Богов! Человеки называют это Космос! Демократию следует защитить силой оружия! В этой ситуации окрепшее и атакующее зло отступает или погибнет! Желаю всем Нам Удачки!
Kalibre missile is the best...
No it's not Russian bias.
по сирии половина тамагавков не долетели даже
Which is more ACCURATE ?
yep! if you want to gaurantee the tomahawk hits its target then just set up a wedding there and bingo it will always hit with pin point accuracy...
kalibr missile for me!
a superior missile platform, all variants and all platform carriers
Yes, the Kalibr missile right for you. To your house 👋