How did Denmark defeat Prussia in 1848? (Short Animated Documentary)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 พ.ค. 2024
  • Small nations don't often defeat much larger ones but in the First Schleswig War (1848-1850) Denmark did just that when it saw off Prussia and much of the German Confederation. So how did it do it? To find out watch this short and simple animated history documentary.
    A special thanks to my patrons:
    Jens Koch-Nommensen
    Øystein Alsaker
    Arcedia
    Sergio M. Vela
    MajesticFirebird
    Harley Raptopoulos
    George Kapoyanis
    Colonel Oneill
    Steven B
    robert lalonde
    CharÉTS
    Gin Aldeguer
    Dennis Vandeban
    Mathias.C
    Brendan W
    Ethan
    Heath Robertson
    Southside Mitch
    Justin Kubusch
    John
    Michael Kram
    Leonard Frank
    Cippalippus
    ChrisRom
    Travis Mount
    Aaron Conaway
    Sean Uzar
    Nathan Mendelsohn
    Christopher Godfrey
    zockotron
    Alex Teplyakov
    Chach
    Dr. Schtnizel
    Ron Johnson
    Steven Gibson
    Jesse Plung
    Matthew Toles
    Handsoup
    mgnesium.poetry
    Jacob Zachs
    Jason Vandeventer
    Jason Hirsch
    Leena Al-Souki
    John Garcia
    Joe DeVito
    Matt Reed
    Florian Mäder
    Zachary Pascalar
    Anthony McCann
    Colm Byrne
    Valentyn
    No way
    Stefan Møller
    Cade Summers
    William Yates
    Brayden Perry
    BattleGoat Studios
    Clay Carroll
    Joseph Reinsch
    ZCoupon
    Jonny Minogue
    BenDrums24
    Yared Cristiano
    Tristan Kreller
    Ishan Roychowdhury
    Jeffrey Schneider
    Jamie van Brewen
    JT96
    Ryan Haber
    Alex G.
    Wolf
    Mik Scheper
    Joell Bel
    Aeryn and Lisa Toland
    Kishan Nair
    James R DeVries
    Ken Fitzgerald
    Sean Long
    Jane Sumpter
    Hunter Bayliss
    0_DannyBoy
    Shauna K
    Tino
    StarshockNova
    Piotr Wojnowski
    Tyler Bomkamp
    Joshua Schneider
    Tranier Bocaj
    Nicholas Menghini
    Tony Belmonte
    Nolan Peale
    Garrett Manarin
    Nick Macarius
    Angel Aguiñaga
    Chris PeBenito
    Duke
    Duane Bridges
    Flinnster00
    Sahni
    blaZzinG_FurY
    ARandomPaperClip
    Bartosz Zasada
    Hexapuma
    Tim Stumbaugh
    Tim Stone
    Windischgraetz
    Justin Short
    C. C. C.
    Warren Rudkin
    Juan Castillo
    Ahmed Roshdi
    Ned Burke
    George Caponera
    Logical Insanity
    Johann_Gambolputty_of_Ulm
    Geoffrey Sparrow
    Tim Sweeney
    TheFlyingDeutschland
    erez87
    Robin!
    Robert Meehan
    Burt Clothier
    Ethan Harlow
    Matthew Ward
    Donald Weaver
    SirAlpaka
    David Spellmeyer
    Moraxian
    Charles Kwiatkowski
    Mars Project
    LambOfLeg
    Paul Munro
    Mark Littlehale
    Juan Benet
    Harrison Wiener
    Roko Lisica
    YugiJitsu Games
    Oriki
    Brian Giordano
    Peter Hopkins
    Philip Yip
    Nathan Snyder
    Will Sullivan
    John Gross-Whitaker
    Zachary Oertel
    Dan Reiher
    Kevin Phoenix
    Sean D.
    Mario Mejia
    Martha Grondin
    sharpie660
    Andrew F
    Erik Hare
    Evan Ellingson
    John Orr
    Jack Nelson
    Andreas Mosand
    tegsirat
    Andrew Patane
    Alexandre Corbett
    Manny F
    ixs
    Thomas McGraw
    Aaron Larrow
    The Funks
    Ciege Engine
    khaki enthusiast
    Matthew O'Connor
    Bobby Giordano
    Remko Huisman
    Patty Culp
    Rosebird
    george tyler
    Joseph Hutchins
    alexccg
    Mr.Myoozik
    Jakester1238
    Nathan Ngumi
    Steve Bonds
    James
    Magdalena Reinberg-Leibel
    Joel Wasserman
    Ben Jambor
    Andrew Sever
    Jon Wright
    Nicolas Dronsky
    Syagrius Beans
    Vegard Tønnessen
    Matt Busch
    Matthew Venuti
    T. c. north
    Joshportunities
    nullptr
    Richard Wolfe
    William Clark
    Bort Ward
    Ruben Rodriguez
    I'm Not In The Description
    Dustin Koellhoffer
    Eric Askins
    Sara Birnbaum
    Mark Ploegstra
    Dr. Sarno
    Vance Christiaanse
    Nuukov
    Jonathan Niehaus
    Mario Peshev
    Adrian Marine
    Allen Rines
    Peter Marino
    Tactical_Jackal
    HelloAgain
    Konstantin Bredyuk
    D. Mahlik
    Phillip Gathright
    Liquid Chief
    Bradley Backoff
    Contdoko12
    William Adderholdt
    Serius_Loyola
    Dullis
    KNSTRKTVST
    Darth Zayexeet
    Colin Cecil
    Chris Weisel
    Jasmin Vikk
    Tortle!
    Jeff Sharon
    ThePalestRose
    WolfiZee
    Chase Labiste
    A. J. Smart
    bas mensink
    Spencer DeRosier
    Tyler Jenkins
    Carl Blanton
    SketerK
    Rob Rollins
    Joseph Kerckhoff
    Thomas Wang
    Sethars
    Ian M
    Swanfleet
    Jasdeep Brar
    Melissa Prober
    Bren Ehnebuske
    Hiro P
    Isabel Harrison
    Ali Sadighian
    Anthony Uk
    Ted Ingram
    Charles Doolittle
    Shannon Cartee
    Seth Reeves
    Shakira Graham
    Doug MacLean
    Miky Hidalgo Morriss
    Heytun
    Robert Brockway
    Tom Ebert
    Samantha McCormick
    Tom of Essex
    blei95
    Tommi Hewitt
    Robin_Col
    Lindorien
    João Santos
    Kameohawk
    Typhoon2401
    Russell Downing
    Kasi
    M Scho
    Jan Bart Verbist
    Daniel O'Reilly
    Schwarzer Hai
    Jackarice26
    zemnmez
    James
    Gina Service
    Rhys Jackson
    Ben L
    Tarsirrus
    Rhys Little
    Ash Elford
    Twinny Hill
    Phil Johnston
    Roberticus1992

ความคิดเห็น • 1.3K

  • @Max-ts5mw
    @Max-ts5mw 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4631

    As someone with a modern point of view the idea of Denmark being a great power was a shock when I first got into history

    • @walterschmidt7817
      @walterschmidt7817 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +680

      My biggest revelation was Lithuania. Till the 8 grade I believed that they were just a small insignificant baltic state, turns out no .

    • @candiman4243
      @candiman4243 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +606

      @@walterschmidt7817 when I first started playing EU4 I was like "why on earth is lithuania this big? did they really own all that land??"

    • @f3tsch906
      @f3tsch906 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +460

      Mine was my own homeland, austria. Like as a kid you tell me this small tennisbat of a country once ruled more land than germany?

    • @Sceptonic
      @Sceptonic 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +355

      ​@@walterschmidt7817The biggest revelation was finding out Latvia had a colony

    • @WolfenX4
      @WolfenX4 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Same here

  • @francesco8000
    @francesco8000 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5481

    More than a "Denmark defeated Prussia" it feels more "Prussia didn't win a war where Denmark happened to be on the opposing side".

    • @johnpoole3871
      @johnpoole3871 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +365

      That is what it means to win a war though. Be on the opposing side of the side that failed to win.

    • @user-ds8rj2vc4v
      @user-ds8rj2vc4v 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +129

      Kinda like the US revolutionary war. British Empire and France going at it

    • @sebastiansteidle6238
      @sebastiansteidle6238 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +314

      "Prussia didn't Lose. It merely failed to win".

    • @PANZERFAUST90
      @PANZERFAUST90 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      ​@@johnpoole3871🤦

    • @balabanasireti
      @balabanasireti 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      ​@@PANZERFAUST90?

  • @stephansteenberg5790
    @stephansteenberg5790 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2349

    The statesman Lord Palmerston: "Only three people have ever really understood the Schleswig-Holstein business - the Prince Consort, who is dead - a German professor, who has gone mad - and I, who have forgotten all about it."

    • @makutas-v261
      @makutas-v261 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +113

      Hegel is the professor

    • @JanJansen985
      @JanJansen985 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +83

      I say britains greatest prime minister was Lord Palmerston

    • @txorimorea3869
      @txorimorea3869 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

      @@makutas-v261 100% madhouse material.

    • @comicbookbin
      @comicbookbin 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +55

      I learned this quote way back as an undergrad in German history and never forgot it. I use this quote very often when speaking about obscure topics! Thank you for using this favourite quote of mine here.

    • @gabba-hey
      @gabba-hey 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Pitt the Elder!@@JanJansen985

  • @madskristiansen
    @madskristiansen 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1781

    The Danish victory in 1848-49 became a great sense of national pride for Denmark. They called it "the spirit from 48", and there is a nationwide known marching song from back then called "Dengang jeg drog afsted" (That time I went forward) They forgot about the international help they got and became overwhelmed with nationalistic hybris. They tried to force Slesvig and Holstein into the national Danish kingdom again in 1864, which broke the treaty and started the war of 1864 against Prussia and Austria. Denmark thought they could win again like 1848. No other nations intervened, and Denmark got slaughtered. All of Southern Jutland got occupied and was only restored after WW1. The defeat was a nationwide national trauma for the Danes. It has affected how we modern Danes see ourselves and our country in the wide world. We modern Danes do not see ourselves as big romantic empires anymore, and we focus on bettering our state instead of expanding it. "Hvad udad tabes skal indad vindes" (What's lost outward shall be won inward) -Danish proverb.

    • @arishokqunari1290
      @arishokqunari1290 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

      Why did the international power not aid Denmark in the second war like they did during the first war?

    • @BoxStudioExecutive
      @BoxStudioExecutive 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +231

      @@arishokqunari1290 he literally says so: Denmark broke the treaty.

    • @onurbschrednei4569
      @onurbschrednei4569 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +176

      @@arishokqunari1290 Austria came to help Prussia the second time, and the aggressor was also clearly Denmark, who broke a treaty and annexed Schleswig.

    • @WolfenX4
      @WolfenX4 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

      Dude this is legendary history

    • @ancalagon1144
      @ancalagon1144 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +44

      That’s a great proverb. This is a great comment.

  • @SolciteGuy
    @SolciteGuy 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +871

    Though it wasn't what was discussed in this video, it's so interesting to hear about the Schleswig-Holstein wars. One of my ancestors died by a grenade in the 1860's. The very last thing he ever did was write a poem to his family before dying in a hospital some days after

    • @JJMHigner
      @JJMHigner 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      I thank him for his service. Thank you also for sharing that. That's a great legacy.

    • @hwgwrestling9203
      @hwgwrestling9203 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      There were Grenades back then???

    • @realdragao6367
      @realdragao6367 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +45

      @@hwgwrestling9203yes?? Even earlier actually. Nowhere as similar to the ones we all know though.

    • @chinsaw2727
      @chinsaw2727 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +46

      @@hwgwrestling9203
      Grenades go back centuries. The earliest grenades bore a resemblance to those hand held bombs you’d see in cartoons, fuse included.
      In the War of Vienna, the Ottoman invaders would put gunpowder into small glass spheres, light the fuse, and throw it at the enemy. There grenades were lighter and more “elegant” than the ones the Austrian garrison were using. Instead of glass, they used iron, which was much heavier, but produced much, much more shrapnel.

    • @TheFranchiseCA
      @TheFranchiseCA 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

      One of my own ancestors was a Danish war hero in the first war (the one discussed in this video), receiving the Order of the Dannebrog.
      ...Then he left Lutheranism for a dissenting faith and was 'encouraged' to move to America.

  • @I_am_bacon._.
    @I_am_bacon._. 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +380

    I am danish and we learned about the schleswig wars in history class. Interesting to see you cover the first schleswig war.

    • @birb8079
      @birb8079 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Damm you are lucky, i never got that in school

    • @unclenogbad1509
      @unclenogbad1509 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Ummm... First??

    • @acuothacuoth502
      @acuothacuoth502 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      @@unclenogbad1509 yep prussia and austria invaded schleswig and holstein then prussia took schleswig from austria and kept both until schleswig later voted to rejoin denmark and holstein stayed with germany after WW1

    • @user-wc9vy4oc5h
      @user-wc9vy4oc5h 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

      ​​@@acuothacuoth502You've made a mistake. Only the northern majority danish speaking part of the duchy of Schleswig joined Denmark after WW1. Most of the duchy of Schleswig is still part of Germany today. Schleswig-Holstein is a state of the federal republic of Germany

    • @EEEEEEEE
      @EEEEEEEE 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      E‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎

  • @saalok
    @saalok 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +409

    I didn't even know this was a thing. Your content on unusual questions and answers really never fails to impress.

    • @eddy20lehner
      @eddy20lehner 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      And in 1864 Prussia took it over anyways lol

    • @Korschtal
      @Korschtal 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      A large part of this territory became part of the modern Federal Republic of Germany after the Second World War. It was decided by a referendum, ending several centuries of armed grumpiness.

    • @lordnaarghul
      @lordnaarghul 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It's because it gets overshadowed by other events at the time, like the revolutions in 1848, the Mexican-American war at the same time + all the tension that leads to the civil war, the Irish Potato famine, and a few other things. Not to mention Bismarck would go on to make all of it irrelevant just a couple of decades later. 1848-1871 was an extremely busy period for world history so this little nothing-war gets overlooked.

    • @Emilsuseronyoutube
      @Emilsuseronyoutube 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@Korschtal Well, the entire territory already became a part of Prussia after the Second Schleswig War in 1864. A referendum (well, plebiscite) after WW1 transferred the (primarily danish-inhabited) North Schleswig back to Denmark, and the borders have remained the same since (As far as I am aware, the border did not change after WW2)

    • @EEEEEEEE
      @EEEEEEEE 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      E‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎

  • @belbrighton6479
    @belbrighton6479 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +97

    I loved your German volunteer with a different label on his helmet. Brilliant.

    • @EEEEEEEE
      @EEEEEEEE 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      E‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎

  • @Spielen_Videos
    @Spielen_Videos 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +258

    1848:
    Denmark: "You shall not *pass!!!"*
    1864:
    Prussia: "Guess who's back?"

    • @kristianpoulherkild3401
      @kristianpoulherkild3401 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Still did better than Austria in 1866

    • @PANZERFAUST90
      @PANZERFAUST90 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Is that a question?

    • @balabanasireti
      @balabanasireti 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      ​@@kristianpoulherkild3401That depends

    • @nrbmemes2414
      @nrbmemes2414 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@balabanasiretitell me who unified germany, prussia or austria. Exactly.

    • @kristianpoulherkild3401
      @kristianpoulherkild3401 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@balabanasireti Not really. We inflicted greater losses on Prussia in 1864 and we lasted longer. Had it not been for those pesky breech loaders and a faulty strategy of not moving troops around, the outcome would have been a military stalemate. That might still have happened if we had relied on hit and run attacks like the 1st war of Slesvig.

  • @xeanderman6688
    @xeanderman6688 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +49

    That Louis Napoleon bit never gets old

  • @rewriting-history
    @rewriting-history 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +176

    Never knew about that conflict, thank you for making this video!

    • @kristianjohansen5561
      @kristianjohansen5561 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      This was actually the first out of two "Schleswig wars" the second Schleswig war (1864), was between Denmark, Prussia and Austria, where Denmark lost. That war was a very important althoug small war as it was the start of the beginning of a German Empire and where Bismarck started to become influential in Prussia.
      There even is a danish movie about that war called 1864 - Brødre i krig (Brothers at war).
      the special thing about both wars, was that families and friends ended up splitting due to some joining the Danish side, and others the German side, so you could end up not only fighting your own countrymen but also your own family.
      The second war, was the bloodiest war in Denmarks history.

    • @jejehatesme31
      @jejehatesme31 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      its you!

    • @rewriting-history
      @rewriting-history 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jejehatesme31 no way!

    • @rewriting-history
      @rewriting-history 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@kristianjohansen5561 Very interesting, thank you for letting me know. I should make an alternate history on that, sounds really interesting

    • @jaedenb3795
      @jaedenb3795 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hello there

  • @MustacheCashStash125
    @MustacheCashStash125 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +358

    Because James Bissonnette was commanding the Danish army

    • @JosTheMan1
      @JosTheMan1 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

      Knew it. Had to be

    • @dasmensh
      @dasmensh 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

      He even paid for the army expenses

    • @royale7620
      @royale7620 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So funny OMG the 500th billion comment to make such a garbage copypasta omg guys pls give me likes I made a channel joke omg

    • @truerespect4247
      @truerespect4247 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      ​@@royale7620James Bissonette pays bots to make you cry.

    • @ghaznavid
      @ghaznavid 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      He was funded by Kelly Moneymaker.

  • @stoissdk
    @stoissdk 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +69

    Wow I guess I as a Dane, have been too focussed on the war in 1864. It turns out one of my ancestors was from a small village called Sieseby, between Flensburg and Kiel in Schleswig-Holstein. He became a dragoon in the Danish Prince Ferdinand's Dragoon regiment in Aarhus (present day Denmark). Since he was born in 1815, that would have made him around 33 years at the time of the war in 1848... and of the right age to take part in the war. I have to look into this =)

    • @jacafren5842
      @jacafren5842 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Perhaps he fought in Rytterfægtningen på Aarhus Mark, a Danish victory in a small battle just about where Aarhus University is today

    • @jacafren5842
      @jacafren5842 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      A small warning, this video is full of rather major mistakes. But fun, and well made.

  • @freddytang2128
    @freddytang2128 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +234

    I was in Copenhagen few months ago and visited their war history museum. Most of their wars seem to be summarized as “we made a valiant effort. We had some wins. But in the end we lost”

    • @Memodown
      @Memodown 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +60

      Actually more historic wins than losses, but some significant and memorable losses: Siding with France in the Napoleonic wars, loss of Norway to Sweden/England, loss of Schleswig-Holstein to the German Empire, and occupation by Nazi Germany during WWII.

    • @makutas-v261
      @makutas-v261 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

      They were full of wins in middle ages

    • @ecurewitz
      @ecurewitz 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They didn’t lose that one

    • @JanJansen985
      @JanJansen985 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@makutas-v261 denmark wasnt a real thing for most the middle ages

    • @makutas-v261
      @makutas-v261 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      @@JanJansen985 and yet they scored most of the Ws and held scandinavian power.

  • @joshuaandre8911
    @joshuaandre8911 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +260

    Good to know that this part of history that's so obscure is finally given the spotlight

    • @EEEEEEEE
      @EEEEEEEE 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      E‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎

  • @mrterp04
    @mrterp04 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +267

    Another great vid! Five suggestions from me, a Patreon supporter, if you’re looking for future video ideas:
    1.) How close did the world come to nuclear war during the Cuban Missile Crisis? (aka Cuban Missile Crisis Explained)
    2.) How has Spain held onto its lands in Africa?
    3.) What was life like in China’s European concessions?
    4.) How did Thailand remain independent?
    5.) Why is the UN headquartered in New York City?

    • @verycool1833
      @verycool1833 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      i think he covered the thailand question before that its too much tension between french and british colonies so they kept it as a buffer state

    • @just1rando
      @just1rando 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@verycool1833 Nice profile pic

    • @achourfreepalestine
      @achourfreepalestine 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      He already did 2 of them and the rest I think he's moving away from
      I see the best candidates are 1 and 5

    • @EebstertheGreat
      @EebstertheGreat 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@achourfreepalestine Nah, he hasn't done one on (2) or (4) yet. He has a video about how Spain missed out on the scramble for Africa, but not on how it managed to take and hang onto Ceuta and Melilla. He hasn't done any videos featuring Thailand at all. And afaik, he hasn't covered (3) either, but correct me if I'm wrong. Personally I think they are all good, though (3) is a little too broad.

    • @achourfreepalestine
      @achourfreepalestine 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@EebstertheGreat he did a video about Thailand you can search it up
      You are right about the Spain but I think it's kinda similar so it would be boring
      As of 3 I meant it when I said "moved from that type of videos"

  • @GaryAdame777
    @GaryAdame777 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +256

    Prussia then goes on to defeat Denmark 20 something years later.

    • @balabanasireti
      @balabanasireti 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +110

      ​@@Bill-cx1smI personally think that they would've still won without Austria but that's just my opinion

    • @Sceptonic
      @Sceptonic 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +39

      ​@@Bill-cx1sm🤓

    • @t34r
      @t34r 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +43

      And then austria. And then the baguette boys also got a slap. But don't worry. The last one is definitely not gonna lead to an all out total war forty years later.

    • @hannibal-rb3go
      @hannibal-rb3go 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The difference being Bismarck understood diplomacy much better then the Prussian leadership here did. At least they were smart enough to not keep pushing and start a world war lol.

    • @andreasottohansen7338
      @andreasottohansen7338 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      I mean yeah, they kicked the shit out of France too. Don't expect a child to win a match against a boxer, who has been winning matches left right and center.

  • @Troels_T_Kjoeller
    @Troels_T_Kjoeller 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +169

    It’s an interesting subject, but the video misses several times: 1. Schleswig and Hostein would not automatically be lost when the King died, and it did in fact not happen when he died i 1863. The two duchies also had different rules about the matter. 2. The Schleswig-Holstein rebels didn’t rebel because they thought the King had been overthrown - that was just the best political stance they could take. Rather, they were afraid that political developments in Copenhagen ment the Danish-national political movement would gain the power to tie Schleswig tighter to Denmark. 3. Schleswig and Holstein were not one uniform entity. While Holstein was a German duchy with a German population, Schleswig was a Danish duchy with a mixed German-Danish population, with a slight Danish majority (going by language - in reality many Schleswigers didn’t really define themselves by a national identity simply based on their language). The German-nationalist movement was therefore pretty representative of Holstein, but not of the whole of Schleswig, where the Danish-national movement pulled in the other direction, and created the central conflict in the matter. 4. The reason Denmark wanted to keep Schleswig and Holstein wasn’t because they were rich, but because of all the ties - historical, social, political, economical, you name it - that ties parts of a country or empire together. You wouldn’t say that Spain today don’t want Catalonian independence just because of money, or that Great Britain don’t want Scottish independence because of money. It’s a gross simplification. I’ll stop here. Sorry for the long post.

    • @tahamuhammad1814
      @tahamuhammad1814 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      He also totally left out the involvement of the revolutionary German Empire, which was the actual entity that went to war (I believe). I remember reading on wikipedia something like the commander refused to return on Prussia's commands because he said that his commands come from German Empire's goverment, not from Prussia.

    • @gustav331
      @gustav331 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      This video in very wrong in many ways. Prussia also took part in the 1849 campaign, and they were outthought and outfought by Olaf Rye, who made them overextend the German lines. Prussia and Denmark did not make peace till 1850.
      I think this video is based on the English Wikipedia article on the war, because that article is full of errors (and has almost no references), and this video makes a lot of the same errors as that article.

    • @dodixaber8968
      @dodixaber8968 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@gustav331 you know what, thanks to hbomberguy video about plagiarism, I kinda suspect this channel content too. This channel does not even cite sources or even put source in description.

    • @user-gp5yz5yz4x
      @user-gp5yz5yz4x 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ​​@@gustav331yeah sometimes you wonder with this guy. He seems like one of the better history tubers (God knows most of them are literal shit) but wikipedia is your source for your college essay not something you're publishing. Yet he comes to many of the same conclusions that you'd see on a half baked wikipedia article

    • @iankemp1131
      @iankemp1131 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@user-gp5yz5yz4x @gustav331 Well, normally both History Matters and Wikipedia seem pretty accurate (if a major subject clearly has errors in Wikipedia, a lot of editors tend to descend on it and correct it, especially as solid references are demanded). Maybe this article has had less scrutiny from people with a particular interest or knowledge on it.

  • @Tathagatchat
    @Tathagatchat 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

    So many things happened in 1848, this kinda fell through the cracks

  • @HeyThere93
    @HeyThere93 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    In the danish town of Fredericia the victory is celebrated every year. Denmark won a great battle 6th July 1849 defending the town with big loses. Serveral streets etc. are named after the most important Danish generals. You can still walk on the historically ramparts surrounding the town :)

  • @bololollek9245
    @bololollek9245 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +33

    Then Bismarck came. Basically, the architect of Germany, he later planned the more successful war against Denmark as a way of training his army, then, the expedition to Austria to cement Prussia as the true princeps of the German states, and then finally, against the country he determined as an enemy to unite all Germans around, France. Then, Wilhelm the 2nd thought he would do a better job with his own policy 😅

    • @Mantos777
      @Mantos777 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Bismarck was one of a kind. Sad to see later that Wilhelm the 2nd and hitler would destroy much of his "work".

  • @tobiasklevig6971
    @tobiasklevig6971 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    My great great grandfather served in this war, and I'm so psyched to see the best history TH-camrs finally getting into it.

  • @ferrusvilkas8544
    @ferrusvilkas8544 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +50

    I have just realized a critical issue with the map History Matters uses: Flevoland exists. The flevoland project wasn't started until 1957. It seems to be on the peak netherlands mug too. Not much of the european map has changed of the last couple hundred years, but flevoland is a pretty noticeable addition and it is funny that even I didn't notice this before.

    • @genovayork2468
      @genovayork2468 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      You really lack history knowledge if this is the " *critical* " issue you find in their maps.

    • @ferrusvilkas8544
      @ferrusvilkas8544 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      @genovayork2468 I don't lack history knowledge considering it has nothing to do with history. Because it's about a map, not about history. Since it's quite a big mistake, and since it is pretty much one of the only noticeable differences, it can be deemed fairly critical since it is a misrepresentation of a country.

    • @raedwulf61
      @raedwulf61 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      By Lucifer's beard, you're right!

    • @chequereturned
      @chequereturned 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Why insult their knowledge? They pointed out a critical issue, they didn’t say there are never any other inaccuracies.

    • @genovayork2468
      @genovayork2468 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@ferrusvilkas8544 You lack it because the truly critical inaccuracies are horrendous historical ones, not this coast problem.

  • @mykeinso1364
    @mykeinso1364 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    I was sad rn, but seeing that vid is uploaded cheered me a bit. Thanks

  • @josephsarra4320
    @josephsarra4320 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +109

    Here are two suggestions I want you to do next: 1) how did the world react when Napoleon III gained power in 1852? (The video that you uploaded earlier, abruptly cut and then taken down for some reason), 2) why the USA didn’t get involved in the French Revolutionary & the Napoleonic Wars?

    • @timesnewlogan2032
      @timesnewlogan2032 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

      1. “Oh great, this again.”
      2. They did, in an attempt to seize Canada. It didn’t go well.

    • @josephsarra4320
      @josephsarra4320 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@timesnewlogan2032 Thank you, but I wanted History Matters to upload the videos.

    • @MrMah-zf6jk
      @MrMah-zf6jk 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@timesnewlogan2032 the War of 1812 was a completely separate conflict from the Napoleonic Wars. Also, the USA had no real plans of annexing Canadian territories; occupied Canadian lands were merely going to be used as a bargaining chip against Britain to get them to stop impressment.

    • @johngulyas695
      @johngulyas695 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      @@MrMah-zf6jk
      Separate conflicts but the impressment of sailors was directly caused by the Napoleonic Wars

    • @ananomalocaris1682
      @ananomalocaris1682 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      History Matters did actually have a video on that first question, but he either deleted or privated it for some reason.

  • @ghaznavid
    @ghaznavid 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Great content as always.

  • @rogaineablar5608
    @rogaineablar5608 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Love this channel. Thanks for the new content!

  • @vulbarian420
    @vulbarian420 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    Keep up the good work 😊

  • @karlwittenburg5868
    @karlwittenburg5868 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +40

    I was about to say that I would find it more surprising that it was Prussia that Denmark “defeated” over other great powers because of how exemplary their military was. But yeah when the other great powers will smack you over every which way possible you kinda have no choice but to back down

    • @zimriel
      @zimriel 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      see also: Suez

    • @mso2013
      @mso2013 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Why would a prussian defeat surprise you? Sweden defeated them?

    • @TerminatorHIX
      @TerminatorHIX 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Prussia was as militarised as it was because it was surrounded on all sides by great powers, but avoiding the nightmare scenario of fighting multiple great powers at once drove its diplomacy.

  • @amberswafford9305
    @amberswafford9305 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    “It’s weird that you even brought it up.” 🤣 It’s the lil cheeky remarks like that combined w my obsession w historical information that has me always looking forward to anything HM posts, regardless of the particular topic.

  • @RubberToeYT
    @RubberToeYT 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video as always

  • @muhammadhabibieamiro3639
    @muhammadhabibieamiro3639 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Another amazing video

  • @Crossloxeverything
    @Crossloxeverything 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    hi bro i like your short video keep uploading and feed me more history

  • @spite3217
    @spite3217 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +62

    They wanted to keep fighting, but James Bisonette helped pressure them to put down their weapons

    • @ecurewitz
      @ecurewitz 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      And Kelly Moneymaker agreed

    • @MikfinityPog
      @MikfinityPog 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      and boogily woogily whatever the fuck also took part @@ecurewitz

    • @venetostato
      @venetostato 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Man these jokes about James Bisonette are so lame

  • @gingergt2918
    @gingergt2918 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I find this channel to be accurate, informative with a dry sense of humour. I love it. Thank you so much.

  • @lordhosk
    @lordhosk 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    thank you patrons!

  • @Leufinngamer
    @Leufinngamer 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Thats an often overlooked part of european history. Glad you made the video. There actually is a small memorial in my town in southern Holstein for the 7 people from the area, that died during this uprising.

  • @lucianoosorio5942
    @lucianoosorio5942 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    “Oblique attack tactics ain't exactly straight!
    I've got creative talents and battle malice, hard as steel on the field, genteel in the palace!” Frederick the Great

    • @GaryAdame777
      @GaryAdame777 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      "Russia's fucked up but no wonder why! With your tundras and taigas and bears, oh my!" - Fredrick The Great.

    • @minelayer26
      @minelayer26 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@GaryAdame777”I’d pay a guy! To tear out my eyes if I had to look at your troll face every night!”

    • @alanpennie
      @alanpennie 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@minelayer26
      This Frederick rap is pretty good.

  • @oliversherman2414
    @oliversherman2414 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great video 👍🏻

  • @Artporductions
    @Artporductions 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great video

  • @Tusalu
    @Tusalu 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Speaking as a Dane, the Prussians sure did get back at us in 1864. The Danish defeat then and subsequent giving up of ambitions to be a major power was like the defining moment for our national identity

    • @MM22966
      @MM22966 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Those Prussians always like to have two go's at anything military.

  • @amnispalus
    @amnispalus 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    The ironic thing about the conflict was the chairman of the German Confederation, who allowed Schleswig to become a member was actually an Austrian Habsburg. The troops of Prussia were then formally federalized. There is even a record of a Prussian general at first refusing an order from its king, because he was then under the authority of the German Confederation, not its member state Prussia anymore.

  • @paulcowlishaw
    @paulcowlishaw 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Cool. Very interesting video

  • @godisgrisen33
    @godisgrisen33 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great Video

  • @familygash7500
    @familygash7500 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    *VIDEO SUGGESTION:*
    Considering the fact that Spain's American colonies began revolting in order to gain independence during The Napoleonic Wars because Napoleon had invaded Spain, why didn't they stop rebelling once Napoleon was defeated?

    • @sunburstshredder
      @sunburstshredder 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I've been wondering about this

    • @doorkey73
      @doorkey73 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      They were committed to the bit of having Independence; they can't just stop.

    • @elyisusking3603
      @elyisusking3603 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      i don't remember exactly but i think one of the reason was due to Fernando VII revoking the constitution of 1812, among other things

    • @Countryballsfan-hp09
      @Countryballsfan-hp09 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      They were already in the 7th step when Napoleon was defeated, why not cross 3 more steps in order to gain independence?

    • @arkdeniz
      @arkdeniz 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Something something freedom something.

  • @jackm6810
    @jackm6810 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

    Can you do a video how the American colonies interacted with Cromwell's government 🥺

    • @GeorgeP1066
      @GeorgeP1066 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I would be super interested in this

    • @saalok
      @saalok 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Iirc he briefly mentioned in another video that they usually sided with the royals, ironically enough

    • @jackm6810
      @jackm6810 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@saalok what did they do once the royals were completely out of power? Did they host a government in exile? Pay taxes?

    • @TheTrex9000
      @TheTrex9000 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This

  • @JonBarraquio
    @JonBarraquio 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    i'm very happy to hear that Charles the First is the last one mentioned. i literally listen to hear it

  • @johnsementa9844
    @johnsementa9844 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    always good when History matters uploads

    • @Steeyuv
      @Steeyuv 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Isn’t it though!

  • @sebastiaan30
    @sebastiaan30 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Hey. This is such a ini mini minus Error. But if check out the netherlands on the map you can see that it includes the province of Flevoland the land didnt exist at that time and was only reclaimed from the sea in the mid half of the 20st Century. Maybe possible if you can correct it in future video's? Big fan. Keep up the good work!! ❤

  • @GuildsmanPirate
    @GuildsmanPirate 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    A question I have never asked myself, hell something I don't think I ever once thought about, but now something I MUST find out

    • @Unhinged29
      @Unhinged29 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      History Matters in a nutshell

    • @balabanasireti
      @balabanasireti 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Never saw this one before...

  • @MCsCreations
    @MCsCreations 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Fascinating!

  • @nathanngumi8467
    @nathanngumi8467 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very interesting!

  • @moredac2881
    @moredac2881 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Who would bring up Napoleon III wanting to be something more than president? as the nephew of the Napoleon, I expect nothing but great and honorable things from him.

  • @jaedenb3795
    @jaedenb3795 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    This guy never fails to become our teacher

  • @jonalban4349
    @jonalban4349 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I always wondered this. Especially considering how badly they lost the second one. Thanks!

  • @dwaynecunningham2164
    @dwaynecunningham2164 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Dude you rock and/or roll.

  • @klaesfuglsang6769
    @klaesfuglsang6769 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    all these problems cause king abel, just had to seperate slesvig, from the kingdom of Denmark in the middle ages.

    • @Carewolf
      @Carewolf 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Just for election meddling.

  • @Rct3master44
    @Rct3master44 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    wtf i love denmark now?!!?!?!

  • @verysmartultrahuman939
    @verysmartultrahuman939 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    2:42 this is why I'm addicted to this channel, caught the wind outta me.

  • @danieltracey652
    @danieltracey652 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks!

  • @pharol
    @pharol 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    It is also worth noting that the greatest battle (in terms of troops involved) in Danish history was fought in 1850

    • @springer9828
      @springer9828 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If we go 100% from confirmed historical knowledge if we take Saxos stories then no

  • @AllenGarvin
    @AllenGarvin 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Everyone interested in this needs to read Flashman novel #2, Royal Flash, which is a wonderful Prisoner of Zenda pastiche that's set in this crazy diplomatic scheme that no one really understands!

  • @180decibel
    @180decibel 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    thats legit crazy, also helps to explain alot geohistorically (for lack of a better term)

  • @Flicky_doodle
    @Flicky_doodle 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A short comment for the algorithm.
    As always fantastic work.

  • @williamfrank962
    @williamfrank962 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Napoleon iii: “I love Democracy, I love the republic.”

  • @ThatLuckyKill
    @ThatLuckyKill 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    Fun fact: The Denmark war was also a preparation war for prussia to test their new combat strategies and weapons. It would have been a nice to have victory but in the end the main goal was testing their strengths in a safe environment for later "plans".

    • @mso2013
      @mso2013 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      You are mixing it up with the 1864 war. You are thinking of when prussia got austrian cannons and back loader muskets.

  • @CobaltLobster
    @CobaltLobster 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I'm going to have to watch this one about a half dozen times so it all can sink in.

  • @Valkyireenlisted
    @Valkyireenlisted 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Yay new video

  • @pulverize3
    @pulverize3 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Denmark is not to be underestimated

  • @eggy6815
    @eggy6815 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Thank god Denmark then held onto those lands forever and ever and never lost any to Germany/Prussia in a future war

    • @mtdnspirit
      @mtdnspirit 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Yaeh... about that...

    • @JeDindk
      @JeDindk 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😂😂😂 ..... those German bastards!

    • @theflyinggasmask
      @theflyinggasmask หลายเดือนก่อน

      After WW2 all Allied nations where trying to shove all that territory down Denmark throat, even going so far as suggesting Denmark getting territory surrounding Berlin. But as Denmark is actually considerate and good neighbors! They didn't accept, as it wouldn't be fair for the locals.

  • @stanstaple
    @stanstaple 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I appreciate your attention to accurate maps (eg Bornholm etc)

  • @allanmsema6224
    @allanmsema6224 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You know it's a good day if History Matters posts

  • @Theology.101
    @Theology.101 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Danes are built different

    • @mtdnspirit
      @mtdnspirit 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yes... We're made from Lego all the way up

  • @raysjb
    @raysjb 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    From watching your video I would have thought the Danes got beat every time and had no chance. But they actually won quite a few battles throughout the war, despite fighting multiple German nations. In fact, the last battle of the war was a Danish victory.

  • @user-wy4re2cf2m
    @user-wy4re2cf2m 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video. Weird how things turned out there.
    As the UK is likely to have a general election next year, would you consider doing a video explaining British parliamentary history, such as what Parliament was like before the 1832 Great Reform Act?

  • @hebl47
    @hebl47 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    And that was that and this sealed this issue forever in perpetuity. And was definitely never revisited again a decade later with a very different result.

  • @xkevinzee
    @xkevinzee 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Denmark, a country renowned for its fearsome Vikings, might have seemed like a formidable empire, but that was probably not the case

    • @SophiaAstatine
      @SophiaAstatine 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not after the Swedish rebellion and then centuries of sabotage from the Brits. That's for sure.

    • @springer9828
      @springer9828 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Well as we had been on a constant decline for the past 350 years at this point you can’t really blame us

    • @SophiaAstatine
      @SophiaAstatine 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@springer9828 Well, things are looking alright now. We just continue to bide our time for now

  • @JafuetTheSame
    @JafuetTheSame 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Ppl also wrongly assume that Prussia was a military powerhouse throughout its entire existence. It wasn't. It went pretty downhill with the Prussian military after the 18th century and they didn't pick up until the 1860s. Prussian army of 1848 was nothing special...

    • @alanpennie
      @alanpennie 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It was effective in putting down The Reds, though I guess that was playing on easy mode.

  • @Terminid_Brood_Emperor
    @Terminid_Brood_Emperor 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    NEW VIDEO!!! LET'S GO!!!

  • @CommissarMitch
    @CommissarMitch 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    2:38
    And this is why I love this channel.

  • @madsdahlc
    @madsdahlc 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Hallo from Denmark . Yes and in 15 years later preussia got its revenge. When They defeated Denmark in the 1864 war beat the living daylights out of us danish . Bismark has became primeminister in Preussia and wanted a united germany under Preussian leader ship . And Slesvig-Holstein was perfect in his agenda. Denmark lost Slesvig and holstein . But Northern Slesvig became danish again in 1920 after germany was defeated in world war one . A referendum was held . Northern Slesvig voted danish and southern Slesvig voted to remain german . So the current danish-german border was result af of the 1920 referendum

  • @troo_6656
    @troo_6656 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +43

    So basically Denmark got incredibly lucky

    • @lawbringer9857
      @lawbringer9857 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Another European country was saved yet again by Britain, yet they still treat us with disdain and like we're their enemies.

    • @brcyca
      @brcyca 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Lucky, yes, but also smart negotiators.

    • @cattysplat
      @cattysplat 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Until Schleswig War 2: Electric Boogaloo.

  • @samdumaquis2033
    @samdumaquis2033 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very interesting

  • @sourabhmayekar3354
    @sourabhmayekar3354 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Awesome

  • @tiffanitoenail840
    @tiffanitoenail840 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    DENMARK MENTIONED 🇩🇰🇩🇰🇩🇰🇩🇰

  • @Mr.KaganbYaltrk
    @Mr.KaganbYaltrk 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Denmark became chad

  • @flawyerlawyertv7454
    @flawyerlawyertv7454 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks. 👍

  • @PopeLando
    @PopeLando 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    2:49 Love the "this was a bit of a no-no" joke.

  • @kristianpoulherkild3401
    @kristianpoulherkild3401 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The boundaries of the duchy of Slesvig is wrong. Those are post-1864 borders and not the pre-1864 borders. The border was changed to compensate for royal possesions in the duchies, which is why Ribe remained in the kingdom of Denmark after 1864 and why the border went rather south of Kolding.

    • @alanpennie
      @alanpennie 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Interesting.
      German nationalists won't have been pleased about giving up part of Schleswig.

    • @springer9828
      @springer9828 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@alanpennieslelsvig which down alll the way to Holstein primarily was danish

  • @richardwilliams4786
    @richardwilliams4786 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Denmark is the kinda guy to walk into a bar. Look at the biggest guy there and say "your not so tough"

    • @fastertove
      @fastertove 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Didn't work so well the next time around (1864) :)

    • @alanpennie
      @alanpennie 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@fastertove
      You win some.
      You lose some.

    • @springer9828
      @springer9828 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@fastertove974-983

  • @MontChevalier
    @MontChevalier 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    A perfect example of right makes might I've ever seen.

  • @M0R3gOfF
    @M0R3gOfF 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Explain baarle-hertog and baarle-naasau next or just the weird borders of Belgium!

  • @therustler30
    @therustler30 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    DANMARK NÆVNT 🇩🇰🇩🇰🇩🇰 !!! MESTRENE !!! 🗣💪 🗣💪 🗣💪

  • @Siptom369
    @Siptom369 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    They'll be back in 1864

  • @AMD7027
    @AMD7027 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Louis Napoleon seems like a nice guy with a level head. Hope he gets to keep it.

  • @TheHylianBatman
    @TheHylianBatman 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Denmark's so interesting. I'd love to study more of their history someday.

  • @cannonball666
    @cannonball666 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Don't mess with the descendants of Vikings

  • @janjensen4719
    @janjensen4719 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Vi slog Preussen ved Slaget i Fredericia ved hjælp af en flådeoperation via Fyn om natten og de skyndte dem ,at flygte tilbage til ,hvor de kom fra. :)

    • @alanpennie
      @alanpennie 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      A triumph of Danish sea power.

  • @ClarinoI
    @ClarinoI 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    "It's weird that we even brought it up"
    Beautiful.

  • @scaper12123
    @scaper12123 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I like that "How?" in the premise was so much more exasperated. Like, "Literally HOW do you let that happen?!"