James Webb Space Telescope by Dr. Jason Lisle
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 ก.ย. 2024
- This Thursday we are very excited to welcome back Dr. Jason Lisle of the Biblical Science Institute! Dr. Lisle has spoken for us a number of times before, but this will be very special because he is going to explain to us the new discovery he has made based on the James Webb Space Telescope data. You won't want to miss this #CFSVirtuallyThere2024!
I really enjoy Dr. Jason Lisle. Thank you Dr. Lisle and thank you Creation Fellowship for having him on.
Why? Like being lied to?
@@freddan6flydo you like making unsubstantiated accusations?
@@hudjahulos I don't make _unsubstantiated accusations_ , why?
@@freddan6fly you literally just accused someone of lying without substantiating it.
@@hudjahulos Someone with claims that goes against the scientific consensus like they lying video creator have the burden of proof. Do you understand _science, the scientific method or the burden of proof_ ?
Fascinating! Thanks for sharing.
Question: if light can travel at infinite speed what is the wavelength shift of that light. Light is a particle and light is a wave. How does redshift get affected by ASC?
The bible is always true.. God doesn't lie
You need to add error bars to your graph, particularly the tired light model green line, those errors bars are quite large the further back you go.
Excellent!!!
"Excellent lies".
Spellchecked for ya
Thank you, Dr Lisle.. "a new Cosmology"..
Dear lord
Мы научились далеко смотреть через Хаббл, Джеймс Уэбб, Спектр РГ и почему то все "деревья да дерево". Пора и на «лес» посмотреть - через «лазерную цифровую рулетку с опорным импульсом *+опорное расстояние* в 1000000 м».
Опыт Майкельсона Морли (1887 г) популярен, а нам нужно его улучшить с помощью «лазерной рулетки *+опорное расстояние* в 1000000 м» что позволяет уйти от большого шума (мусора). так возможно и определим; скорость в самолете; 200, 300, 400, 500 м/с. Вопрос к Вам; что изменится в БОЛЬШОЙ НАУКЕ?
😀
So, then, the Hubble Constant of 73.8 km/sec/Mpc, is replaced by the Lisle Constant of 0.0 km/sec/Mpc! You know you’ve arrived when you discover a New Constant!
You apparently don’t know what the H constant actually is if you make statements like this.
The H constant is a correlation of red shift that is then interpreted to be caused by expansion of space.
Therefore Doppler theory does not replace the H constant, it interprets it as being caused by the physical movement of galaxies instead of being caused by the expansion of space.
Science does not know what: mass, energy, space, and time is. Science uses comparisons to manipulate these phenomena. For example, at one time a foot was the length of the king's foot. Ergo, a foot was two marks an a stick passed around the kingdom. And this "science" is used to prove god is?
Has Dr. Lisle ever looked into the plasma-universe or electric-universe theories?
Those are the same thing and even Lying Lisle might have noticed how bad those where. The Electro-Blasto Universe is from Engineers, not scientists. Not even from Lisle the Liar.
@@EthelredHardrede-nz8yv Too bad that life on this planet depends on engineers being right, while no one cares about those poor scientists... 😁
I guess you believe in "the science"™?
@@EthelredHardrede-nz8yv
What’s he lying about?
@@shipwright6122
That anything the JWST has found supports his young Earth nonsense. Nothing real supports it in the first place. Oh the Bible is a real book but it is from men not a god.
@@EthelredHardrede-nz8yvwhere's your proof he's lying? You can't just assume someone's a liar just because you disagree with their beliefs. Let's see how good of an apologist you are for your religion of atheism.
Support NASA - continues to provide data that supports biblical creation.
Space Coast Creation Club.
Really good stuff.
Q for Lisle: can dark matter be normal matter that just isn’t seen?
No.
@@slowinfastout7043 Do you have an explanation as to why that may be the case?
LMAO!!! Maybe you should provide actual evidence that the bible is correct. Maybe demonstrate that god actually exists!!!
IF you learn enough science and see how absurdly unlikely our existence is you will start believing 'something' had an active hand in things.
Prove he doesn't exist
@@wntu4 Demonstrate what that ‘something’ is. Don’t just guess. Get the evidence for that ‘something’
@@nathaniel_pardue I didn’t claim that a god doesn’t exist. I’m saying that there’s no good evidence to support a belief that a god exists.
@@torontocitizen6802 And I'm telling you flat out that there is. YOU go find it. I'm not here to educate the ignorant. You can start with the Penrose number I guess.
There is no god. Science serves to observe the physical not the spiritual.
Science is thinking. You can think about everything. And everything is pointing to god!😊
@@matthiasgrimm243 I think you do not understand what science is.
Naturally science is about to observe observable entities but when we go back at the singularity there's a first cause that is not material and apart from the creative move it must have been an intelligence agent as we exclude from fine tuning or the primoral dna code so why it is so bad for the science to admit that there is a God? The very foundation of the new scientific revolution of 17 and 18 centuries based on the admiration of the heavenly creation.
Science does tell us about the natural but it has much to tell us about God as well. It provides insight into his creative powers, reasoning, etc. I know you’re an atheist. But, for the believer, it goes much deeper.
There is no such thing as naturally self emergent and organized systems with increasing complexity.
Science explains how things are and were Created
Was no big bang
The evidence shows otherwise.
@EthelredHardrede-nz8yv That evidence is outdated and being replaced according to Jason & the latest discoveries from the JWST. I'm sure he's much more qualified than you are.