if you liked it, Make sure you SHARE the video with your loved ones and on your social media. It's the only way the algorithm notices us. Much love to you all.❤❤
"To:Mr.Without History,this TH-cam Video',was quite interesting:African heritage persons, especially African American'can most certainly benefit by finding out such ancient accurate African positive history. . .5-17-2023'
If you had the possibility of pouring blocks to make up a pyramid, why not shortcut the mold production and demolding and moving into place. Why not pour the whole pyramid in one piece, one huge block, with shafts and rooms cast into the make up of the pyramid? I don't believe that the pyramids were poured block by block. What we see is the use of machinery that was run by electricity. But since the so-called air shafts were sealed and covered by a stone placed over the end of the shafts with such precision that the shafts weren't discovered until the 18th century. To cover them means that electricity was a secret they wanted to hide, the shafts were where the electric cables came in so they could finish the inside while still working on the outside.
I'm a retired MIT scientist & government intelligence analyst. I visited Giza in 2001 & the first thing I said was that those stones had to be made, not carved. There are other stones with curves that clearly had to be made by softening the stones with heat or making them. I said those stones had to be made in place & never moved, dragged, or lifted. I even said the reason theres no space between the stones is because they used molds & they weren't fully dried out when emplaced. Every mystery the guide tried to tell us, I had the answer (in my mind, I didn't want to show the man up). There's no mystery if Europeans stop acting as if Africans back then didn't create, didn't know, & use chemistry (for making concrete), physics, geometry & other high level mathematics, sciences & the metric system, which they clearly had to use to make the stones & pyramids to a specific metric size (eveything from the stones, pyramids & distances have been precisely measured in mm, cm, m, & km). They give all the credit to the Greeks, Romans & and French, who clearly learned it from the Africans/Egyptians. Also, maybe they had a lost technology like using & manipulating the electromagnetic energy that's all around us without wires. We know that this is possible because we see it in nature every day & we've tested it in labs. Also, when I went inside the pyramids, I said, "Oh shit. This is not a tomb. This is some sort of power plant." I'm so happy that TH-cam was created, so now we see lots of other scientists & archeologists agree with what I thought in 2001. The mystery isn't how they were built. The mystery is asking why they were built. They definitely are not tombs. Also, the only reason we don't use the electromagnetic energy all around us is because you can't charge people to use it if they know how to use it.
Growmateing wey you get ur crap from kemet was a province in Egypt : the egyptian empire ruled many provinces : 7000 years ago there was no kemet. Ths akashic record stated thzt 15000 years thre was jemdt rule by the green man that why the artifacts was n is in green before them was the oeange man rhe builder of the egyptian empire 5000 years ago the inferior black pple over ran egypt later on the build kemet. After the mix race run them out of egypt Hemotep the builder of the first stone pyramid was an Andonite n not Black stop following these fools who only dig for relative convenient fact : there is a vast difference between TRUTH n FActs. Ist a fact that thre was a black probienct named kemet but the truth Egypt was EGYPT long before kemer like at one point the change the name of Ethiopia to abbasynian's then his Majesty change it back to Ethiopia
FINALLY SOMETHING THAT ACTUALLY MAKES SENSE. Thank you for this upload. Politics and human vices have much to answer for. Lying and hiding the true facts of history. Thank you again 👏
Tudy4564 why do you say "This great history "here"? Why use "here"? This Great history is sufficient. Not the grammar police but that diminishes your point
Brilliant analysis. I have, for many years, considered the construction of the pyramids to have employed geopolymers. And upon visiting the site in 1989, I became convinced of this hypothesis. The only thing I lacked was an understanding of the methods employed to form the blocks. Your video has thankfully filled that gap in my understanding. Thank you so much for presenting this video. I am and will remain eternally grateful
The difference between Archaeologists and Egyptologist, is that Egyptologist have the authority to declare everything of Kemet as ancient. Ancient Egypt! With an intent to ignore the Kemetic society, or anything that is Black African. When we verbally acknowledge Kemet, we give it life, we give it relevance. This documentary is very much needed. Thank you!
@macintoshsmith4734..Yep,we`re today living in the "information age" where falsificators/whitewashers of history slowly but surely are being debunked..and indeed,.it should be refered to as ancient KEMET instead of "ancient Egypt"..afterall,ancient KEMET excisted for Millinia and long before Alexander the Barbarian showed up in 325BC imposing himself onto the people of KEMET and demanded to be appointed as "pharaoh"(imagine that) and changing the name for the Greek/European word Aígyptos.Egypt..once ancient KEMET..always ANCIENT KEMET!😎
Kemet was actually built by the Anunnaki and the Pharaohs were also Anunnaki that is why you have depictions of Akhenaten and Nefertiti with elongated skulls. And that is why some of the Pharaohs lived much longer than Humans and why in the beginning they were said to be Gods and later Demigods or Anunnaki Hybrids. And that is why the Ca bal has kept a very close eye on Egypt because they don't want anything that really looks ET being revealed.
Africa is the richest continent in the world it's wealth stolen by Arabs Romans The UK France and world Africans murdered tortured kept down poor controlled by Evil UK French Lords UK French Military Chiefs and all their pals and put in puppets They tell the low IQs Africa is poor and the low IQs believe them
It does make sense considering that some South American indigenous nations were also using same techniques to build their structures. It was even documented by European eyewitnesses. There is also this problem I am often facing as a Christian, that regardless the number of evidence some people would not believe just because they don’t want to believe. So… 😊
@@svetoslavpp The indigenous of both regions say they didn't build them. They found them. This is partly the reason logical people say they didn't build them. The other obvious reason is the requirements needed to build those structures didn't exist during the Neolithic, Bronze, Iron or currently in our modern era.
All is a lie! The way they do business, religion, school, education, books, history. Its a lying culture, & I can't stand it. With so much lying going on, you know Satan is the hidden ruler, I mean the big boss of this LYING MATRIX. SOMETIMES I EVEN THINK THEY SHIT LIES!
This information is remarkable and will be shared. BLESS YOU for revealing the TRUTH to the world. AMAZING WORK FROM THE RESEARCH DONE TO THE DELIVERY. ❤
Thanks for this knowledge of self. The Nile is the only river in the world that swell's up by the equator the sediments are so rich and fertile for growth. Once we understand where everything began this is where the Garden Of Eden was. Gen.2 .11 Sankofor 🌎 remember this everything exists in time space 🌌 🌍 🌚 planets the COSMOS. That's CREATION. THE MOST HIGH it never stops it goes on and on and on and on that's also ENERGY.
Thank you for telling all of us the truth. This makes the Egyptians great art and building far greater than history has recognized and given them credit for creating.
This is without question, the most rational/plausible explanation I've heard to date regarding the construction of the pyramids. Thank you. And yes I will share.
Wait, more rational then magical levitating magic boxes by aliens? Psh like ancient ppl were actually intelligent, not cave men with only stone tools?I dunno haha
What you cite as evidence does not stand up to scrutiny. This is a quick synopsis of why it doesn't solve the primary mysteries of the anomalous works of stone, or the associated logistical and operational feats so obviously beyond the means attributed so unforgivably to the peoples of the time of the old Kingdom: 1) We have the quarries with the clear signatures of the biggest sites. Some, like those in Giza, have had specific blocks actually matched to the squares removed from bedrock quarries. 2) Some, like the unfinished obelisk of Aswan quarry, are still there, about two thirds completed. 3) Certain structures, like the pyramids, contain up to 2 million blocks and about 1.3 million are different shapes and sizes to each other. Making that many moulds seems to be more of a task almost than quarrying the granite in the first place. 4) Granite is very different to any form of concrete or polymer. Also each quarry produces different rock that can be linked definitively to megalithic construction sites. 5) Actually no records for polymer industry on such scales exists and no associated tools. 6) The critical blocks have a variety of tooling marks on them, this is already a source of much debate in Egyptology VS Engineering (and Stonmasonry). dwahts.blogspot.com/2023/01/why-geopolymer-theory-is-wrong-for.html?m=1
A terrific video that takes the sci-fi and hocus pocus out of pyramid construction and lets the real world capabilities of the time take center focus. This is the best explanation for the building process of that day and time. Great work on this topic!
Why everything have to be logical, scientific & in man's eyes should look and sound correctly constructed: Just imagine how mysterious those days were over 4000 yrs ago in comparison to now?: Presently in the new millinium there is still much more unsolved mysteries to be discovered: The half has not been told yet?!!!
That same technique is found all over the Americas in Mayan buildings where blocks are fitted so tightly together that could not have possibly been carved. The Olmecs described something called Rock Smog, which was basically stone dust made into a special concrete from which blocks were formed. BTW, the Olmecs looked like Nubians and huge stone heads of them were found all over Mexico.
Needed this. The perspective for years have come from the mzungu. And it always has had some sort of slant. This report fills in all the spaces for me personally. And brings me "With History". It is what happens when you have "Occupiers" in your house that won't leave and they tell someone else's story, according to them.
Also remember that many historians are not aware of the harm they do, most just follow academical trends without questioning its validity. This is a requirement if you want to get "published". It is those who know the truth but don't have the courage to act that are truly hurtful to past and future.
@@withoutHistory Yes. Yes. Great point. Perhaps purposefully compartmentalized. Today's medicine and doctoring itself is a 1:1 example of what you mentioned. The New vibrant and learned Doctor's that have that "Ready-to-go" spirit, are High victim's of this. Unencumbered to historical facts or reality, they are able to work freely. Particularly in term of experience. The Right hand doesn't know what the Left is doing. And maybe its better that they don't know "ALL" of how particular methods and medicines were created or obtained. At least initially. Nefarious it all is absolutely. No matter how it's scrubbed. But for those of who are "clued-in" however, it certainly makes that "hidden hand" of decision, that much more visible.
Ancient Egyptian were not black we have the DNA of the Mummies to prove it so stop trying to steal the identity of Egypt besides everything in it's history is recorded Egypt have all colours of humans skin mostly white because of the location you cannot say only one colour besides we don't have the discrimination you have in the United states in Egypt we are all equal what you are doing is just dividing people stay away from Egypt my country
@Annette Jahnel Works what are you talking about? You do know it is well documented that European historians purposely distorted Kemetic history, right? This was all part of a system of public disinformation to support their economic theft. You are just one of the many victims of this campaign…
When I was a kid, I watched Navajo Indians make brick from the earth. My grandmother was trying to show me how building materials were made "back in the day." I remember the look on her face when I said these are like the big Pyramid bricks in Egypt, right? Her response was, "I never looked at it that way, wow. "
@@Mmmmgood317 well that comment earned a face palm! Where do you people come up with this crap? The natives of the Americas aren't native at all, they came over from Asia via the frozen water bridge between Russia and Alaska. Their genetics are very similar to a mix of Mizrahi (the peoples around India, Tibet, and the "Stans" and Polynesian (Pacific Islanders), not African.
@@nunyabeeoch all black ppl did not originate in Africa🙄 we are the original man! We inhabited every piece of land on this earth. When you read about the first encounters with the Americas… the description described Blk ppl! The ones that migrated here are the ones the yt man wants us to think are aboriginals. They don’t want to admit they stole this land from us! There are more pyramids here than any other place on earth… yet they try to keep us focused on Giza… find somebody else to play with… and miss me with your text book quotes… cuz they lied to us all… even you!
This make me so happy that our ancestors were so Awesome at what they do. i love all my people Praise the Most high and thank you for showing us the truth 🙌🏾 🙏🏾 Amen❤
This makes so much sense. I have watched for years idiots pulling large stones over sand 10 feet a day and saying it would take 20 to 40 years to build a pyramid. i have always doubted their methods and Hypothosis
@@withoutHistory many have not but the history Channel has shown quite a few teams trying to replicate the pyramids. They have always use some of the stupidest methods I have ever seen. From cutting the blocks to moving them. I saw 3 different large groups one time try to build a replica pyramid. They were all testing their theories. It was laughable the techniques they use.
You are bang on Melvin. In fact we are lucky to know Diop at all, many of the other equally consequential pan African historians are often dismissed or disregarded. And yet, I find they bring more historical proof than most, by far.
Humans is not the problem.... These Caucasian people are the problem. They are the ones who have went around the world destroying nature and any thing that either goes against them or they don't understand!!! It's time to speak truth and quit compromising our integrity and morals for the sake of not upsetting Caucasian people!!!
Excellent work! I never heard of this theory. Makes sense that the stone blocks used to construct the great pyramid at Giza were made this way...as well as the stunning statues
It serves us best to bear in mind that just as we are a single species now, so too were we then. The dead of every race have willingly, or unwillingly, lifted us to this very day. And we owe these ancestors our continuation of progress, to be passed on down through the lines of man.
Yeah , but that’s not the point of video. We can claim all we want to be one species but the politics of white supremacy has marginalized and degrade this concept of one species by creating hierarchy of people with different values based on looks, origin, color, etc…
No matter how hard they try to hide the truth. The truth will always come out. God is truth, He was there when things happened. He will bring it about. Thank you so much for taking your precious time to bring about the truth. May the Almighty be with you.😊
Wow, mine blown 😮!! And it makes ALOT of sense because Africans where MASTER mudbrick builders Great jib subhanallah It's really quite sad that people are so bent on there Prejudice they'll if they would just let it go they would learn so much bt many African scholars & Historians like your self
The truth can never hide, because it’s always standing in clear sight ,liars who tried to rewrite history always end up, making a lot of mistakes by telling more lies
I love your content! I read a couple years ago Pyramid of Giza was built by using molds in place. It made so much sense to me. The chemistry mixture of limestone and other materials in some cases granite. You’re video confirms this information! Thank you!
It's wack to just believe this without further investigation.. I know people who've seen the quarries.. so this polymer stuff looks good in a little sense.. True observation on the surface level has many holes in it applied to the pyramids.. and the statue mold thing don't really vibe as actual to is also.. further investigation is needed of this formed- in - ation this video provides..
@@withoutHistoryore like the achievements of those from our ancient past, a people that doesn’t culturally exist anymore.. Sanskrit the veda,s and The Great War of the Marrabarta explains, just how technically advanced they were.. that war was about the lower Cast blacks rising up against the ruling cast whites. to say technology rose out of one culture is just plain idiotic .. All the evidence points to technically advanced cultures spanning the entire world..followed by cultural collapse and destruction of the old.
This was a great one!! Concise, scientific and evidence based. Excellent work, mate. I first heard of this perspective back in 2020, I thought of making a video on it, but now, thanks to your amazing presentation, I do not have to. The concrete explanation is the one that make the most sense to me. Chisels and hammers sound ridiculous 😂 But the Western Egyptologists staunchly defend the chisels, because the theory is that the romans or Greeks invented concrete, and no one before them. 😂😂 When we know that Chemistry itself was invented in Kemet, it is not farfetched at all to think they invented some type of concrete. As a civil engineer, molding makes more sense than cutting hard stone. Anyhow, great video as always, brother. Also you had me pressing like when you showed the beautiful lady😂😂😂😂
All your content is amazing. I visited the Giza complex when I was a young boy and have been fascinated with it ever since. My one question is do you think the pyramids could have an older origination date than 4000-5000 years ago ? In the recent past they found an ostrich egg that appears to have a map of the Giza complex and the Nile river on it. Being that is is an ostrich egg it could be carbon dated and was carbon dated to over 7000 years old. This would predate the "accepted" date by some 2000 years or so . They found a lot of other ostrich eggs with maps drawn on them as well. Could you do a piece on this ? I appreciate all that you do to keep this knowledge out there. Please keep up the good work and Thank you !
Great Great question. Here is my take on this. Erosion on the Giza complex stones looks advanced because it is not real stone, but manufactured limestone. So erosion would act significantly faster on it, but slower than if it was mud bricks. Remember that in 3100 BC king Namer was already building in mud bricks. So they would have had enough time to know that they needed something more durable. Mud bricks is easy to reproduce / copy, but the geopolymer stone bricks formula they kept secret. But the principle in mud bricks and geopolymer is the same. Just different ingredients.
@@withoutHistory So you think that it could be pyramids built by someone else or just earlier pyramids depicted on the ostrich shell ? I do remember when I was in Cairo we also went to Meroe and there were a LOT more pyramids in Meroe than there were in Cairo. But the area of the Nile where the pyramids were depicted on the ostrich shell did look like the same place as Giza. Also the only other thing that makes me think they could be older is the Sphinx. The outside wall was carved into bedrock if I'm not mistaken and the Sphinx was also carved out of a single rock . Much like the churches of Lalibela in Ethiopia . Either way it's still fascinating.
@@DeeMenace The water erosion found on the Sphinx shows it's much older than 5,000 years too. The sealife fossils found throughout Giza suggests the Giza complex was around thousands or millions of years more ancient than Kemet. The machine type markings, millimeter-precision symmetry of the various statues & the pure size of the stones proves this complex was definitely not constructed during the bronze age with hand tools.
Bravo, I agree! I've always thought the stones looked formed artificially! So grateful for this research and helping to set the records and history straight.
Some queries and reservations: 1. When, where, and by whom have these theories been tested by recognised subject-matter experts ? 2. Were all stages filmed/photographed, and documented, illustrating credible realistic reproduction, including full reported analyses of the results ? Density, weight, surface finish, hardness (compensated for time), and a feasibility study including contemporary logistics and material availability/preparation. 3. Were these tests, results & reports presented to the applicable leading global institutes (archaeologic, engineering - civil/materials/chemical) for technical assessment, and accepted as plausible or accurate ? 4. E.g. the casting of hard stone statues would not normally immediately produce high-gloss (high-density, very hard, extremely smooth) surface finishes, so the cast would still need to be finished using something equally as hard, or harder, than the casting. What is the explanation ? 5.. Have any physical remains (or indications) of such manufacturing systems been unearthed or described in contemporary documents/inscriptions ? 6. If these casting/moulding/reconstitution theories are indeed the answer, why are they not today's mainstream explanation of the construction/production techniques used in ancient Egypt ? 7. why did ancient constructors limit themselves to individual blocks ? They must have used some kind of containment or shuttering to make casts and moulds. Why not make seamless pyramids or walls ? They could have used progressive casting to allow lower levels to dry before adding more material. Why were the pyramids clad with limestone, when a mould surface could also be polished without cladding ? Why/how do seams exist, however tight, between blocks ? We know the blocks are separate pieces as evidenced by separation in many locations. ..... Questions. Too many questions. I am open to answers.
Very often "Academia" can be as close minded as a steel trap. Many experts that present theories like this are often ridiculed, snubbed and funding will cease. Many have even been driven out of their careers.
@@zsigzsag it would be a sad world where we do not challenge theories to show evidence of their propositions. And from this video I see mostly theory and little evidence of proof. Equally, it is irrelevant to me who wrote the theory. Einstein also had to prove his ideas.
...I've been wondering about "cast vs carved or cut" for many years. Thank you for your very positive essay, about a subtractive subject. Those pyramids are casts, made from blocks cast on the way up, from a slurry of ground limestone and water. I'll bet the three small pyramids were practice and learning pieces, just like the 3 large ones, were able to teach by example, the Romans and Greek architects and mathematicians. This video is much appreciated
I noticed you quickly glossed over how they would have pulverized diorite into a fine enough powder to pour statues with such fine detail. Also, has the diorite, or the granite for that matter been tested to see if they are composite? Not saying they didn't do it, but diorite and granite would have been a LOT harder to work with. Add to that, we know where the quarries are, and many blocks are not composite, they are shaped.
I’m not sure how they would have. But I have a theory about it that requires more evidence to be brought forward. It is my belief that they melted it. We know ancient Egyptians had magnifying lenses all the way back in 3300 BC. I theorized they could have used it to melt stone using very large lenses. Many queries bare marks of such circular almost scooped stone. It would have been cut or softened on the cutting edges using lenses. In essence old laser tech
@Without History How do you explain the great obelisk that's still sitting there Then there's balbek some things are just a mystery I think that the pyramids are far older than history puts them at.And they weren't no tombs it's hard for us to believe that there could have been a far more advanced culture than ours in the distant past that could do things but in a totally different way than we would today even Easter Island 🗿 there's still a lot of the statues carved but not separated from the volcanic rock yet.
For what it's worth heating stone enough to melt it changes the stone & leaves it detectable that it was melted. For example the stone can turn dark. Some other TH-cam videos have people describing what they got when they melted or attempted to melt stone. I always wondered how anyone would control a large magnifying glass in order to get precise & accurate results. It's not like the ancients had computerized robotic arms to control the hot point being generated by the giant magnifying glass. Plus the hot point only forms at a certain distance from the lense. Quite a challenge to achieve motion in 3 directions to cut deep, straight or along a specific path. Plus once cut, how much time is available to work with the stone till the cut cools & the stone bonds again or the separated stone's newly cut surface thickens & hardens. Just a challenge for me to picture the magnifying glass process with all it's necessary aspects from start to finish. Seems insufficient to just say a hot point sufficient to melt stone can be created.
Simply excellent research and production. A French guy did a 2019 documentary completely supporting your work. Keep it coming. We must completely smash all the lies about us and our great ancestors. This type of work does wonders to regrow our collective confidence worldwide.
Very illuminating in a time of forment and change. A new chapter is being written in our times wherein truth is arising from it's incarceration and coming to the surface. At the end of an age powerful forces are in motion, both destructive and, in this case, illuminating ! May Truth prevail .
Excellent documentation of the history of Egypt and the building of the pyramids. I was there in Egypt. And l learned alot about the history of Kemit as well as the pyramids. I visted Cario, also Luxor, and aswan and the Nubien village of Egypt. I truly was moved by the history and enjoyed the trip there in Egypt. Your documentation of Kemit and the Pyramids of Egypt was very educational and uplifting to know our history. Thank you. 🇪🇬
Thank you for what you are doing, we need to know our history, black history month do us no justice, your research is appreciated ♥️, I would love to see a well documented series of black origins and development from start to where they interrupted us in our evolution, thank you 😊
The basic theory proposed here sounds feasible and sound as far as limestone goes, but how about the harder, black stone sarcophagi and statues, can they too be poured into a mold? If they can and if testing og slices confirm use of hardened stone-paste, it certainly would explain a lot!
What do you make of Menkaure's unfinished pyramid, which shows several large stones in place, most with rough surface while several others have been sanded to a smooth surface? Wouldn't that suggest they had a method for cutting stone with precision?
Interesting fact about the geopolymer technique. It can easily produce rough surface of smooth surface stone blocks just by changing the water concentration. Check out the paper.
so are you claiming that the statues make of the hardest rock we know of were poured in to a mold? limestone is one thing; but the type of stone comprising the amazingly detailed features of statues seems not plausible.
![Chris Langan - The Interview THEY Didn't Want You To See - CTMU [Full Version; Timestamps]](/img/n.gif)
if you liked it, Make sure you SHARE the video with your loved ones and on your social media. It's the only way the algorithm notices us. Much love to you all.❤❤
"To:Mr.Without History,this TH-cam Video',was quite interesting:African heritage persons, especially African American'can most certainly benefit by finding out such ancient accurate African positive history. . .5-17-2023'
❤
I Loved this video, it was very educational and informative!!!!
@@annecrawford7813 thanks so much Anne 🙏🏽🙏🏽
If you had the possibility of pouring blocks to make up a pyramid, why not shortcut the mold production and demolding and moving into place.
Why not pour the whole pyramid in one piece, one huge block, with shafts and rooms cast into the make up of the pyramid?
I don't believe that the pyramids were poured block by block.
What we see is the use of machinery that was run by electricity.
But since the so-called air shafts were sealed and covered by a stone placed over the end of the shafts with such precision that the shafts weren't discovered until the 18th century.
To cover them means that electricity was a secret they wanted to hide, the shafts were where the electric cables came in so they could finish the inside while still working on the outside.
It warms my heart when I here the truth about my people ☻️ thanks!!
I'm a retired MIT scientist & government intelligence analyst. I visited Giza in 2001 & the first thing I said was that those stones had to be made, not carved. There are other stones with curves that clearly had to be made by softening the stones with heat or making them. I said those stones had to be made in place & never moved, dragged, or lifted. I even said the reason theres no space between the stones is because they used molds & they weren't fully dried out when emplaced. Every mystery the guide tried to tell us, I had the answer (in my mind, I didn't want to show the man up). There's no mystery if Europeans stop acting as if Africans back then didn't create, didn't know, & use chemistry (for making concrete), physics, geometry & other high level mathematics, sciences & the metric system, which they clearly had to use to make the stones & pyramids to a specific metric size (eveything from the stones, pyramids & distances have been precisely measured in mm, cm, m, & km). They give all the credit to the Greeks, Romans & and French, who clearly learned it from the Africans/Egyptians. Also, maybe they had a lost technology like using & manipulating the electromagnetic energy that's all around us without wires. We know that this is possible because we see it in nature every day & we've tested it in labs. Also, when I went inside the pyramids, I said, "Oh shit. This is not a tomb. This is some sort of power plant." I'm so happy that TH-cam was created, so now we see lots of other scientists & archeologists agree with what I thought in 2001. The mystery isn't how they were built. The mystery is asking why they were built. They definitely are not tombs. Also, the only reason we don't use the electromagnetic energy all around us is because you can't charge people to use it if they know how to use it.
I was a polywog, and I totally agree with you.....perhaps an electromagnetic phase change, to a fluid and back to solid...
Great! anexpert to backup my story.
Wow this is very knowledgeable and also the best information on this. Thanks for sharing this important information and video.
I find interesting how people stop thinking rationally when they find that the color of skin does not match their expectations.
Edward Leedskalnin, manipulated the electromagnetic energy that's all around us without wires
This should've been made public 50 years ago it would've cleared up a huge number of speculation
Growmateing wey you get ur crap from kemet was a province in Egypt : the egyptian empire ruled many provinces : 7000 years ago there was no kemet. Ths akashic record stated thzt 15000 years thre was jemdt rule by the green man that why the artifacts was n is in green before them was the oeange man rhe builder of the egyptian empire 5000 years ago the inferior black pple over ran egypt later on the build kemet. After the mix race run them out of egypt Hemotep the builder of the first stone pyramid was an Andonite n not Black stop following these fools who only dig for relative convenient fact : there is a vast difference between TRUTH n FActs. Ist a fact that thre was a black probienct named kemet but the truth Egypt was EGYPT long before kemer like at one point the change the name of Ethiopia to abbasynian's then his Majesty change it back to Ethiopia
They may try to hide the truth but eventually the old guard dies and the truth is finally reveled. Thanks for always telling the truth.
FINALLY SOMETHING THAT ACTUALLY MAKES SENSE.
Thank you for this upload. Politics and human vices have much to answer for. Lying and hiding the true facts of history.
Thank you again 👏
This is Great history here. It shows superior intelligence of ancient Egypt and their contributions to the world. Thanks for sharing.
Tudy4564 why do you say "This great history "here"? Why use "here"? This Great history is sufficient. Not the grammar police but that diminishes your point
@@arthurwhite9823 Have a Blessed Weekend Arthur.
This channel is incredibly eye opening. Shedding light on truth is the highest form of scholarship.
Brilliant analysis. I have, for many years, considered the construction of the pyramids to have employed geopolymers. And upon visiting the site in 1989, I became convinced of this hypothesis. The only thing I lacked was an understanding of the methods employed to form the blocks. Your video has thankfully filled that gap in my understanding. Thank you so much for presenting this video. I am and will remain eternally grateful
The difference between Archaeologists and Egyptologist, is that Egyptologist have the authority to declare everything of Kemet as ancient. Ancient Egypt! With an intent to ignore the Kemetic society, or anything that is Black African.
When we verbally acknowledge Kemet, we give it life, we give it relevance.
This documentary is very much needed. Thank you!
@macintoshsmith4734..Yep,we`re today living in the "information age" where falsificators/whitewashers of history slowly but surely are being debunked..and indeed,.it should be refered to as ancient KEMET instead of "ancient Egypt"..afterall,ancient KEMET excisted for Millinia and long before Alexander the Barbarian showed up in 325BC imposing himself onto the people of KEMET and demanded to be appointed as "pharaoh"(imagine that) and changing the name for the Greek/European word Aígyptos.Egypt..once ancient KEMET..always ANCIENT KEMET!😎
Africa comes from General Africanus, beware calling Kemet peoples by what Babylonians force.
Kemet was actually built by the Anunnaki and the Pharaohs were also Anunnaki that is why you have depictions of Akhenaten and Nefertiti with elongated skulls. And that is why some of the Pharaohs lived much longer than Humans and why in the beginning they were said to be Gods and later Demigods or Anunnaki Hybrids. And that is why the Ca bal has kept a very close eye on Egypt because they don't want anything that really looks ET being revealed.
@@niktes3337 Yes, this is right!
Africa is the richest continent in the world it's wealth stolen by Arabs Romans The UK France and world Africans murdered tortured kept down poor controlled by Evil UK French Lords UK French Military Chiefs and all their pals and put in puppets They tell the low IQs Africa is poor and the low IQs believe them
Finally, something that makes sense of the construction of the pyramids!!!!!!
It doesn't. He's way off.
Why are there huge quarries ; & what of the unfinished still EMBEDDED obelisk ?
It does make sense considering that some South American indigenous nations were also using same techniques to build their structures. It was even documented by European eyewitnesses.
There is also this problem I am often facing as a Christian, that regardless the number of evidence some people would not believe just because they don’t want to believe. So… 😊
@@svetoslavpp The indigenous of both regions say they didn't build them. They found them. This is partly the reason logical people say they didn't build them. The other obvious reason is the requirements needed to build those structures didn't exist during the Neolithic, Bronze, Iron or currently in our modern era.
Job well done keep up for us without eyes to see very clearly.
Let the truth be told
This is so incredible and it makes so much sense. It’s sad how our government lies to us. Happy to have found this.
All is a lie! The way they do business, religion, school, education, books, history. Its a lying culture, & I can't stand it. With so much lying going on, you know Satan is the hidden ruler, I mean the big boss of this LYING MATRIX. SOMETIMES I EVEN THINK THEY SHIT LIES!
This information is remarkable and will be shared. BLESS YOU for revealing the TRUTH to the world. AMAZING WORK FROM THE RESEARCH DONE TO THE DELIVERY. ❤
Thanks for this knowledge of self. The Nile is the only river in the world that swell's up by the equator the sediments are so rich and fertile for growth. Once we understand where everything began this is where the Garden Of Eden was. Gen.2 .11 Sankofor 🌎 remember this everything exists in time space 🌌 🌍 🌚 planets the COSMOS. That's CREATION. THE MOST HIGH it never stops it goes on and on and on and on that's also ENERGY.
Very well laid out. The connection to traditional African building techniques is obvious and makes perfect sense.
LOL
Thank you for telling all of us the truth. This makes the Egyptians great art and building far greater than history has recognized and given them credit for creating.
This is without question, the most rational/plausible explanation I've heard to date regarding the construction of the pyramids. Thank you. And yes I will share.
Wait, more rational then magical levitating magic boxes by aliens? Psh like ancient ppl were actually intelligent, not cave men with only stone tools?I dunno haha
What you cite as evidence does not stand up to scrutiny. This is a quick synopsis of why it doesn't solve the primary mysteries of the anomalous works of stone, or the associated logistical and operational feats so obviously beyond the means attributed so unforgivably to the peoples of the time of the old Kingdom:
1) We have the quarries with the clear signatures of the biggest sites. Some, like those in Giza, have had specific blocks actually matched to the squares removed from bedrock quarries.
2) Some, like the unfinished obelisk of Aswan quarry, are still there, about two thirds completed.
3) Certain structures, like the pyramids, contain up to 2 million blocks and about 1.3 million are different shapes and sizes to each other. Making that many moulds seems to be more of a task almost than quarrying the granite in the first place.
4) Granite is very different to any form of concrete or polymer. Also each quarry produces different rock that can be linked definitively to megalithic construction sites.
5) Actually no records for polymer industry on such scales exists and no associated tools.
6) The critical blocks have a variety of tooling marks on them, this is already a source of much debate in Egyptology VS Engineering (and Stonmasonry).
dwahts.blogspot.com/2023/01/why-geopolymer-theory-is-wrong-for.html?m=1
you are full of it.
I'm guessing you've never tried to calculate force required to overcome friction on a slope? The answer might surprise you
@@ryandebruys2762😮😮
Loved how this is delivered and researched makes complete sense and is so thoroughly done. Thank you
Excellent content presentation, will makes the true cultural thieves quake in their shoes.
Thanks a bunch DL. This warms my heart.
Your channel is invaluable to seekers of truth, please continue shining your amazing light.
A terrific video that takes the sci-fi and hocus pocus out of pyramid construction and lets the real world capabilities of the time take center focus. This is the best explanation for the building process of that day and time. Great work on this topic!
Why everything have to be logical, scientific & in man's eyes should look and sound correctly constructed: Just imagine how mysterious those days were over 4000 yrs ago in comparison to now?: Presently in the new millinium there is still much more unsolved mysteries to be discovered: The half has not been told yet?!!!
Very logical and informative. Makes perfect sense. Thank goodness, an answer to a ancient question.
That same technique is found all over the Americas in Mayan buildings where blocks are fitted so tightly together that could not have possibly been carved. The Olmecs described something called Rock Smog, which was basically stone dust made into a special concrete from which blocks were formed. BTW, the Olmecs looked like Nubians and huge stone heads of them were found all over Mexico.
Correct
You're correct that the Olmecs were in fact Nubians. In simple words Black people
TA Merians and TA Setians. "Smai TAwi.".
@@a.andrechisholm8528it is absolutely B. African
My GOD this is excellent!👌 👌👍
The truthfulness of this video calls for a 100 red roses as a gift to those who made it. Thank you and God Bless for sharing this with humanity.
Very well done. Presentation and informaamazing! both amazing!
Love your content dude. Very happy to see you have reached 100K subs. Here's to 100K more.
Great work. I’m truly indebted to the work of this channel. Keep up with all the great work
At last ! Sense and sensibility . Makes logical sense .Tired of the Alien contributions to Kemets achievements .
Great info , great watch !!
Needed this. The perspective for years have come from the mzungu. And it always has had some sort of slant. This report fills in all the spaces for me personally. And brings me "With History". It is what happens when you have "Occupiers" in your house that won't leave and they tell someone else's story, according to them.
Also remember that many historians are not aware of the harm they do, most just follow academical trends without questioning its validity. This is a requirement if you want to get "published". It is those who know the truth but don't have the courage to act that are truly hurtful to past and future.
@@withoutHistory Yes. Yes. Great point. Perhaps purposefully compartmentalized. Today's medicine and doctoring itself is a 1:1 example of what you mentioned. The New vibrant and learned Doctor's that have that "Ready-to-go" spirit, are High victim's of this. Unencumbered to historical facts or reality, they are able to work freely. Particularly in term of experience. The Right hand doesn't know what the Left is doing. And maybe its better that they don't know "ALL" of how particular methods and medicines were created or obtained. At least initially.
Nefarious it all is absolutely. No matter how it's scrubbed. But for those of who are "clued-in" however, it certainly makes that "hidden hand" of decision, that much more visible.
Ancient Egyptian were not black we have the DNA of the Mummies to prove it so stop trying to steal the identity of Egypt besides everything in it's history is recorded Egypt have all colours of humans skin mostly white because of the location you cannot say only one colour besides we don't have the discrimination you have in the United states in Egypt we are all equal what you are doing is just dividing people stay away from Egypt my country
@Annette Jahnel Works what are you talking about? You do know it is well documented that European historians purposely distorted Kemetic history, right? This was all part of a system of public disinformation to support their economic theft.
You are just one of the many victims of this campaign…
@AnnetteJahnel Bro stop being a snow flake, his clearly telling the truth
finally !! Some so simple and right under our noses !! Thank You !!
When I was a kid, I watched Navajo Indians make brick from the earth. My grandmother was trying to show me how building materials were made "back in the day." I remember the look on her face when I said these are like the big Pyramid bricks in Egypt, right? Her response was, "I never looked at it that way, wow. "
Because the original Indian is carbon ppl… Blk ppl. So it makes sense that the tradition was passed down but she doesn’t know the connection…
@@Mmmmgood317 well that comment earned a face palm! Where do you people come up with this crap?
The natives of the Americas aren't native at all, they came over from Asia via the frozen water bridge between Russia and Alaska. Their genetics are very similar to a mix of Mizrahi (the peoples around India, Tibet, and the "Stans" and Polynesian (Pacific Islanders), not African.
@@nunyabeeoch all black ppl did not originate in Africa🙄 we are the original man! We inhabited every piece of land on this earth. When you read about the first encounters with the Americas… the description described Blk ppl! The ones that migrated here are the ones the yt man wants us to think are aboriginals. They don’t want to admit they stole this land from us! There are more pyramids here than any other place on earth… yet they try to keep us focused on Giza… find somebody else to play with… and miss me with your text book quotes… cuz they lied to us all… even you!
@@nunyabeeochWho also have genetic markers of African origins.
This make me so happy that our ancestors were so Awesome at what they do. i love all my people
Praise the Most high and thank you for showing us the truth 🙌🏾 🙏🏾
Amen❤
We also have Pyramids in Sudan 🇸🇩, but nobody talks about it.
You have to be the ones to do it - there are those who don’t want you to shine.
Truth will Always be Revealed!! Thank you for this Wonderful Presentation!!
Best explanation ever on how the pyramids was built
Thanks so much Wisdom. Do share the video we appreciate it
LOL
Know THYSELF........
This makes so much sense. Thanx for busting all my ancient alien ideas! Seriously, this is is the most logical explanation I have heard so far.
This makes so much sense. I have watched for years idiots pulling large stones over sand 10 feet a day and saying it would take 20 to 40 years to build a pyramid. i have always doubted their methods and Hypothosis
Many archeologist have never tried the theories they advance.
th-cam.com/video/KMAtkjy_YK4/w-d-xo.html
This is a theory of how the pyramids were built.
@@withoutHistory many have not but the history Channel has shown quite a few teams trying to replicate the pyramids. They have always use some of the stupidest methods I have ever seen. From cutting the blocks to moving them. I saw 3 different large groups one time try to build a replica pyramid. They were all testing their theories. It was laughable the techniques they use.
@@withoutHistory Wally Wallington
Now this is something I can get behind! Thank you for sharing!
Remember to like and share good people.
This is very important.
Thanks so so much for the video and info.
Much more informative than main stream "science". Thank you.
EXCELLENT documentary ... and - it FITS all the criteria / tests of credibility !!!
A great history lesson. It makes absolute sense especially in light of other theories. Thank you.
I'm in my 60s and this is the best explanation of how the Pyramid were Constructed.
Excellent.
Dr. De op has contributed so much science regarding Egypt to it's finest . And had not been given any recognition by European scholars .
You are bang on Melvin. In fact we are lucky to know Diop at all, many of the other equally consequential pan African historians are often dismissed or disregarded. And yet, I find they bring more historical proof than most, by far.
you mean dr dre
Or Dr. Ben
He is discovering and disputing all their lies how will they recognize him.
Thank you for the knowledge. True knowledge. True history.
They were just beyond everyone else’s, imagine where they would have been now. Humans are their own worst enemy. Awesome work!!🎉 Congratulations 🎉
Humans is not the problem.... These Caucasian people are the problem. They are the ones who have went around the world destroying nature and any thing that either goes against them or they don't understand!!! It's time to speak truth and quit compromising our integrity and morals for the sake of not upsetting Caucasian people!!!
Well done, the most intelligent and plausible explanation for the building of the Pyramids
Excellent work! I never heard of this theory. Makes sense that the stone blocks used to construct the great pyramid at Giza were made this way...as well as the stunning statues
well done, thank you for the information and the efforts to produced the materials. I appreciate the conclusions and the criteria of the approach.
Love it when common sense prevails
This is the best explanation about how Giza Pyramid was built. Thanks!
Thanks so much Aravind
It serves us best to bear in mind that just as we are a single species now, so too were we then. The dead of every race have willingly, or unwillingly, lifted us to this very day. And we owe these ancestors our continuation of progress, to be passed on down through the lines of man.
hmm... very well said Tinker.
RESPECT!
Chakotays speech from Distant Origins.
Yeah , but that’s not the point of video. We can claim all we want to be one species but the politics of white supremacy has marginalized and degrade this concept of one species by creating hierarchy of people with different values based on looks, origin, color, etc…
No matter how hard they try to hide the truth. The truth will always come out. God is truth, He was there when things happened. He will bring it about. Thank you so much for taking your precious time to bring about the truth. May the Almighty be with you.😊
Thank you for bringing out the truth, the true African history.
Great information ℹ️
Wow, mine blown 😮!! And it makes ALOT of sense because Africans where MASTER mudbrick builders
Great jib subhanallah
It's really quite sad that people are so bent on there Prejudice they'll if they would just let it go they would learn so much bt many African scholars & Historians like your self
Thanks you so much east side ! Much love 🙏🏽🙏🏽
Thank You For sharing This it certainly explains more than I have read before.
The truth can never hide, because it’s always standing in clear sight ,liars who tried to rewrite history always end up, making a lot of mistakes by telling more lies
Typical of Europeans and Arabs, not the real ones we don't see, because they are hidden.
very intuitive, and thought provoking. First time for me, I'm convinced.
I love your content! I read a couple years ago Pyramid of Giza was built by using molds in place. It made so much sense to me. The chemistry mixture of limestone and other materials in some cases granite. You’re video confirms this information! Thank you!
🙏🏽🙏🏽. Thanks so much Tracey. I hope we can change the narrative around African achievements
@William Halle why do you call yourself nonsense? There are far better names
It's wack to just believe this without further investigation.. I know people who've seen the quarries.. so this polymer stuff looks good in a little sense.. True observation on the surface level has many holes in it applied to the pyramids.. and the statue mold thing don't really vibe as actual to is also.. further investigation is needed of this formed- in - ation this video provides..
The video 'confirms' nothing. It hypothesizes a novel theory.
@@withoutHistoryore like the achievements of those from our ancient past, a people that doesn’t culturally exist anymore..
Sanskrit the veda,s and
The Great War of the Marrabarta explains, just how technically advanced they were..
that war was about the lower Cast blacks rising up against the ruling cast whites.
to say technology rose out of one culture is just plain idiotic ..
All the evidence points to technically advanced cultures spanning the entire world..followed by cultural collapse and destruction of the old.
This answered a lot of questions for me, Thank you from a Blackman. Thank you!
Thanks so much Ken
beware of deception
At last! An explanation that I can believe. Where was this concept when I was in high school?
under your bed ?
Amazing channel, great work brother!
Thank you. This question has been on my mind for ages
🙏
Thank you for the time and effort taken to explore what and how our ancestors made these monuments that have survived the time continuum to this day.
Thanks so much Carl. Means a lot.
This was a great one!! Concise, scientific and evidence based. Excellent work, mate. I first heard of this perspective back in 2020, I thought of making a video on it, but now, thanks to your amazing presentation, I do not have to.
The concrete explanation is the one that make the most sense to me. Chisels and hammers sound ridiculous 😂
But the Western Egyptologists staunchly defend the chisels, because the theory is that the romans or Greeks invented concrete, and no one before them. 😂😂
When we know that Chemistry itself was invented in Kemet, it is not farfetched at all to think they invented some type of concrete. As a civil engineer, molding makes more sense than cutting hard stone.
Anyhow, great video as always, brother.
Also you had me pressing like when you showed the beautiful lady😂😂😂😂
what evidence
what evidence
you chanel is kickass to man keep it up spread the knowledge
Hello from Nigeria. I love your work. Logically on point always. Nor more myths. Let the truth be known. Respect 🙏.
Thanks so much Lawrence. 🙏🏽🙏🏽 plenty note where that came from
Imhotep built the step Pyramid for Djoser, but he was long dead by the time the great pyramid was built.
Loving this channel so far, so much to learn!
All your content is amazing. I visited the Giza complex when I was a young boy and have been fascinated with it ever since. My one question is do you think the pyramids could have an older origination date than 4000-5000 years ago ? In the recent past they found an ostrich egg that appears to have a map of the Giza complex and the Nile river on it. Being that is is an ostrich egg it could be carbon dated and was carbon dated to over 7000 years old. This would predate the "accepted" date by some 2000 years or so . They found a lot of other ostrich eggs with maps drawn on them as well. Could you do a piece on this ? I appreciate all that you do to keep this knowledge out there. Please keep up the good work and Thank you !
Great Great question. Here is my take on this. Erosion on the Giza complex stones looks advanced because it is not real stone, but manufactured limestone. So erosion would act significantly faster on it, but slower than if it was mud bricks.
Remember that in 3100 BC king Namer was already building in mud bricks. So they would have had enough time to know that they needed something more durable. Mud bricks is easy to reproduce / copy, but the geopolymer stone bricks formula they kept secret. But the principle in mud bricks and geopolymer is the same. Just different ingredients.
@@withoutHistory So you think that it could be pyramids built by someone else or just earlier pyramids depicted on the ostrich shell ? I do remember when I was in Cairo we also went to Meroe and there were a LOT more pyramids in Meroe than there were in Cairo. But the area of the Nile where the pyramids were depicted on the ostrich shell did look like the same place as Giza. Also the only other thing that makes me think they could be older is the Sphinx. The outside wall was carved into bedrock if I'm not mistaken and the Sphinx was also carved out of a single rock . Much like the churches of Lalibela in Ethiopia . Either way it's still fascinating.
@@DeeMenace Good question, as for the pyramids depicted on the ostrish shell, It hard to confirm that these were the pyramids of Giza.
@@DeeMenace The water erosion found on the Sphinx shows it's much older than 5,000 years too. The sealife fossils found throughout Giza suggests the Giza complex was around thousands or millions of years more ancient than Kemet.
The machine type markings, millimeter-precision symmetry of the various statues & the pure size of the stones proves this complex was definitely not constructed during the bronze age with hand tools.
Just because the egg was 7000 yrs old doesnt mean the carvings were done 7000 yrs ago
Enjoyed your video, the commentary was clear and easy to listen to. Some others are much more difficult to follow. Thank you so much!
Thanks so much Rawn 🙏🏽🙏🏽
Bravo, I agree! I've always thought the stones looked formed artificially! So grateful for this research and helping to set the records and history straight.
I LOVE THIS❤❤❤❤
Thank you for bringing this to 💡 light
Thanks so much AWcinema... ❤ right back at ya.
Love it!! Simple, straightforward, perfect :)
Great work as usual. I salute you, Sir.
God BLESS You for your contributions. I'm so glad to learn this I'm in awe. 😃
Some queries and reservations:
1. When, where, and by whom have these theories been tested by recognised subject-matter experts ?
2. Were all stages filmed/photographed, and documented, illustrating credible realistic reproduction, including full reported analyses of the results ? Density, weight, surface finish, hardness (compensated for time), and a feasibility study including contemporary logistics and material availability/preparation.
3. Were these tests, results & reports presented to the applicable leading global institutes (archaeologic, engineering - civil/materials/chemical) for technical assessment, and accepted as plausible or accurate ?
4. E.g. the casting of hard stone statues would not normally immediately produce high-gloss (high-density, very hard, extremely smooth) surface finishes, so the cast would still need to be finished using something equally as hard, or harder, than the casting. What is the explanation ?
5.. Have any physical remains (or indications) of such manufacturing systems been unearthed or described in contemporary documents/inscriptions ?
6. If these casting/moulding/reconstitution theories are indeed the answer, why are they not today's mainstream explanation of the construction/production techniques used in ancient Egypt ?
7. why did ancient constructors limit themselves to individual blocks ? They must have used some kind of containment or shuttering to make casts and moulds. Why not make seamless pyramids or walls ? They could have used progressive casting to allow lower levels to dry before adding more material. Why were the pyramids clad with limestone, when a mould surface could also be polished without cladding ? Why/how do seams exist, however tight, between blocks ? We know the blocks are separate pieces as evidenced by separation in many locations.
.....
Questions. Too many questions. I am open to answers.
Very often "Academia" can be as close minded as a steel trap. Many experts that present theories like this are often ridiculed, snubbed and funding will cease. Many have even been driven out of their careers.
@@zsigzsag it would be a sad world where we do not challenge theories to show evidence of their propositions. And from this video I see mostly theory and little evidence of proof. Equally, it is irrelevant to me who wrote the theory. Einstein also had to prove his ideas.
How to analyze pyramid stones, Geopolymer Institute.
th-cam.com/video/V9PrKXZI_iw/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/0Q1f0YBm4ic/w-d-xo.html
Beautiful. Thanks for your great work. The truth will not stay hidden.
Thanks so much Michelle. Do share the video we appreciate it
what truth
...I've been wondering about "cast vs carved or cut" for many years. Thank you for your very positive essay, about a subtractive subject. Those pyramids are casts, made from blocks cast on the way up, from a slurry of ground limestone and water. I'll bet the three small pyramids were practice and learning pieces, just like the 3 large ones, were able to teach by example, the Romans and Greek architects and mathematicians. This video is much appreciated
I noticed you quickly glossed over how they would have pulverized diorite into a fine enough powder to pour statues with such fine detail. Also, has the diorite, or the granite for that matter been tested to see if they are composite? Not saying they didn't do it, but diorite and granite would have been a LOT harder to work with. Add to that, we know where the quarries are, and many blocks are not composite, they are shaped.
Surface softened and shaped .
I’m not sure how they would have. But I have a theory about it that requires more evidence to be brought forward.
It is my belief that they melted it.
We know ancient Egyptians had magnifying lenses all the way back in 3300 BC. I theorized they could have used it to melt stone using very large lenses.
Many queries bare marks of such circular almost scooped stone. It would have been cut or softened on the cutting edges using lenses. In essence old laser tech
@Without History How do you explain the great obelisk that's still sitting there Then there's balbek some things are just a mystery I think that the pyramids are far older than history puts them at.And they weren't no tombs it's hard for us to believe that there could have been a far more advanced culture than ours in the distant past that could do things but in a totally different way than we would today even Easter Island 🗿 there's still a lot of the statues carved but not separated from the volcanic rock yet.
@@withoutHistory: If such a LARGE magnifying glass exist it would have been uncovered or discovered by now.
For what it's worth heating stone enough to melt it changes the stone & leaves it detectable that it was melted. For example the stone can turn dark. Some other TH-cam videos have people describing what they got when they melted or attempted to melt stone. I always wondered how anyone would control a large magnifying glass in order to get precise & accurate results. It's not like the ancients had computerized robotic arms to control the hot point being generated by the giant magnifying glass. Plus the hot point only forms at a certain distance from the lense. Quite a challenge to achieve motion in 3 directions to cut deep, straight or along a specific path. Plus once cut, how much time is available to work with the stone till the cut cools & the stone bonds again or the separated stone's newly cut surface thickens & hardens. Just a challenge for me to picture the magnifying glass process with all it's necessary aspects from start to finish. Seems insufficient to just say a hot point sufficient to melt stone can be created.
Heartfelt in its honesty and truthful facts.
Thank you💯✨
For 30+ years I've been trying to explain this same thing to people. I've worked in industrial construction. I know masonry. It's been around forever.
Great piece of work am definitely sharing this .
Thanks so much Zulu.
Simply excellent research and production. A French guy did a 2019 documentary completely supporting your work.
Keep it coming. We must completely smash all the lies about us and our great ancestors.
This type of work does wonders to regrow our collective confidence worldwide.
Very illuminating in a time of forment and change. A new chapter is being written in our times wherein truth is arising from it's incarceration and coming to the surface. At the end of an age powerful forces are in motion, both destructive and, in this case, illuminating ! May Truth prevail .
So do you think they were able to do the granite the same way as they did the limestone? I would like to see that done with granite today and diorite.
Thanks for the info. I'm looking forward to the next video
Excellent documentation of the history of Egypt and the building of the pyramids. I was there in Egypt. And l learned alot about the history of Kemit as well as the pyramids. I visted Cario, also Luxor, and aswan and the Nubien village of Egypt. I truly was moved by the history and enjoyed the trip there in Egypt. Your documentation of Kemit and the Pyramids of Egypt was very educational and uplifting to know our history. Thank you. 🇪🇬
Just brilliant. Thankyou so nuch for posting.
Thanks so much Sava.
Thank you for what you are doing, we need to know our history, black history month do us no justice, your research is appreciated ♥️, I would love to see a well documented series of black origins and development from start to where they interrupted us in our evolution, thank you 😊
Funny you say that. Check out our last video then.
th-cam.com/video/LO7Vinxq0mw/w-d-xo.html
who interrupted
Thanks!
Carol!! Again?
You really don’t have to.
Thanks so much 🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽
The basic theory proposed here sounds feasible and sound as far as limestone goes, but how about the harder, black stone sarcophagi and statues, can they too be poured into a mold? If they can and if testing og slices confirm use of hardened stone-paste, it certainly would explain a lot!
Thank you for revealing and amplifying the truth ! Hennu Ma'at !
I like this..... good education..... because....I'm a college graduate.... Have been miss educated
We all have Michael. We all have. But the good thing is that we can do something about it.
This is amazing, I hope more is being worked out.
Please does this also explain how the Sarcophagi were built?
Great video, this does indeed explain everything. Take that Georgio!
What do you make of Menkaure's unfinished pyramid, which shows several large stones in place, most with rough surface while several others have been sanded to a smooth surface? Wouldn't that suggest they had a method for cutting stone with precision?
Just a thought but could that be why it's unfinished? Too impractical and time consuming?
Interesting fact about the geopolymer technique. It can easily produce rough surface of smooth surface stone blocks just by changing the water concentration. Check out the paper.
@@robertgibson6872 perhaps, but they could still do it by cutting or some other means.
Menkaures polished stones were stolen to build Cairo- they just couldnt get the top ones off easily
@@mikev4621 I'm not understanding what you wrote.
Very cool video. I'm adding you to my subscribed list. I love a good mystery with clues.
so are you claiming that the statues make of the hardest rock we know of were poured in to a mold? limestone is one thing; but the type of stone comprising the amazingly detailed features of statues seems not plausible.
I arived sceptical and left enlightened (And subscribed) Excelent intelligent production.