I disagree with the ruling. I think he should have gotten his money back for the initial tow not the return tow. If another judge said there is no curb then how does the tow company keep the money? He should have gotten his money back and the tow company should have to chase NYC. The plaintiff is the one left holding the bag for their mistake.
New Yorker here: yes active driveways are a thing in NYC. If someone goes to the city and requests the city cut the curb in a spot that was not a driveway previously you will see ‘active driveway’ signs. Alternately people with driveways will post active driveway signs to deter drivers from parking.
The plaintiff has the burden of proof initially. 🤷🏾♂️ Defendant didn't really have to justify the tow until the plaintiff proves it was an illegal tow. Even with that letter, clearly he had the wrong defendant.
The past 22 years living at my property, I had over 2 dozen times my drivewy blatantly blocked. Vehicle has to be summoned first by either Traffic enforcement or NYPD before it can be towed at offenders cost here NYC. Its absolute hell if driveway blocked after 4pm and on Sundays because traffic enforcement no longer on clock in my area so NYPD takes FOREVER, obviously not a 911 priority. I always take pics all angles of Vehicle in reference to driveway. Of the 2 dozen times I only had 1 instance where owner came a hollering next day and quickly did a 180 when I showed him the pics. His wife parked the Vehicle and told her husband that she didn't block driveway.
I’m from Queens New York and there is such thing as a active driveway sign I guess to influence people not to park there such as if it has a gate or if it doesn’t look like it’s a active driveway for some reason but it is or maybe it’s not but the owner just doesn’t want people parking there they can put up a sign that says active driveway.
Some don't look like driveways, especially in busy cities. And some look like a driveway but may not be. I.e. it's a slot in front of a home but doesn't have a city permit for parking on it. You can't just make your own driveway.
I DIDNT KNOW BYRON ALLEN HAD ANYTHING TO DO WITH HER NEW SHOW! THANKS FOR THE FUN FACT BUT I DEFINITELY KNEW THEY WERE ACTORS LIKE DEAF DUMB AND BLIND I KNEW THEY WERE "ACTORS"
If he actually sued them, it probably costs him more than the tow. The city isn't responsible for him being too lazy to go pick up his own car. They are not going to pay for anything more than the cost of the original removal tow if they even paid that. Any amount over that was his own fault.
It's hard to believe because the cops issued a ticket which means they were on scene and saw that he was illegally parked. He probably got it dropped because the issuing cop never showed up to court, not because he wasn't illegally parked still. Which that court still found that he was in violation, but they still dropped it due to who knows what (again, likely the cop not showing up to prove the ticket).
@@meechee2too754 the tow company didn't do anything wrong, so he isn't entitled to his money back from them, though he may be from the city for allowing the tow.
@@ThisIsDjYigytugd it was a “close call” as Harvey said. The tow truck company even admitted they are sometimes told it isn’t a driveway and no ticket is issued. I would surmise this “close call” has happened before. Had it gone in favor of the plantiff which it sounds as if it should or could have. The tow truck company would have to then sue the city for the unnecessary tow. No one should be enriched by this tow. Yet the tow company is the only one who was.
@@meechee2too754 it was only a close call because he got the ticket dismissed. If it wasn't dismissed, then he'd have no right to a refund of tow. It being dismissed means that the tow shouldn't have been requested by the police, but that's the police fault, not the tow company. The company did what they were supposed to given the laws (police give ticket, police request tow). But the tow company didn't do anything wrong, hence why they don't have to give any money back. The police did by giving a ticket that wasn't valid (though we aren't sure if the ticket wasn't valid, the case could have been dismissed due to lack of evidence, not a bad ticket). Whether it was a valid driveway or not is irrelevant to the tow company who is only supposed to tow when called and police ticket is given, which is what they did. If he was his money back after getting the ticket dismissed, it's on the city who gave the bad / false ticket. The tow company did a job and should be paid for it. But it's not their fault that the city gave a bad ticket. The plaintiffs problem is with the city at this point.
It’s obvious someone turned part of the block into a driveway and it wasn’t done by the city or permitted to be one. That’s why the ticket was thrown out
Those teeth! Active driveway???? He's delusional. He's so nervous because he knows he sounds like a fool. Once JM starts asking smart questions, he knows he doesn't seem too smart.
He was nervous because she took the tow guys side automatically and assumed the guy was lying until she read the paper and then changed her tune. When this young black guy with golds try to use the justice system the correct way by being the plaintiff instead of the defendant he is still treated like a criminal. When in all actuality he was in the right and the police was in the wrong.
@@MrSexykay27It should be noted that the case being dismissed matters for why it was dismissed. It wasn't dismissed because it wasn't an illegal parking job, which matters because the only reason the police wrote the ticket is because it was. The only reason the tow company was called is because it was an illegal parking job determined by the cops. The tow company didn't do anything wrong for the tow, but the police may have if the ticket wasn't valid, which that judge didn't say it wasn't, and still found him to be in offense. But that judge still dropped the case (for whatever reason). That just means he doesn't owe money for the ticket, but it doesn't mean the tow wasn't valid. Hence why the judge was asking all those questions for why it got dropped and to see if the tow company was at any fault, which they weren't.
Because in NYC not all driveways are active and can be used for parking if they are not. Helps that not everyone who has a driveway, even has a car to use it. So the city has an active driveway sign in some parts, such as possibly at this school, to prevent people from blocking it. The court summary she read doesn't sound like it got thrown out for that though, so not sure why he brought that up
Perhaps the lot is so big that it has a secondary entrance near the actual entrance of the playground and that 1 is not in use therfore it's an inactive driveway.
why would he understand that. is it his problem that they shouldnt have towed his car ? No, its between them and the city . so this nonsense that I have to understand that you are only doing your job that was ILLEGAL doesnt make any sense. If a cop tells you to tow someone car out of their own driveway illegally, wouldnt that still mean he was only doing his job of illegally towing someone car ! If its not legal, then all contracts that follow are void. If he hired a lawyer, the lawyer would have stated that if the initial action is illegal, then everything that follows is illegal which means the tow truck would have to return the money and then sue the city to recoup whatever they thought they had lost. If he tries to sue the city, he will LOSE!... The fellow had no dealings with the city since the city wasnt the one that towed his car or collected on the tow... This judge isnt good at her job but then again, this is not real court and is more similar to arbitration. It's the same as if a merchant sells something on a stolen credit card, he would have to return the funds to the bank and be out of the property to the thief since the action was illegal
I know someone that had their vehicle towed from a shopping mall plaza for no reason, stole everything in the vehicle (claiming there was nothing in there) and when the person went to get it out of the tow yard tried to charge them all these outrageous prices. I was watching the news and saw the same tow company under investigations for illegally towing cars and charging the owners to get their cars out (after stealing property inside). I told my friend and there was a major lawsuit (my friend won) and the company had to pay him over 5k in property damages and loses.
@@Daydream355 It was a loading drive and no you can't block them. They use that driveway to unload the trucks for items the school purchased - food ect..
What DIFFERENCE does it make if his vehicle is *“Old enough to vote”?* 🙄 That didn’t have anything to do with the case, and comes across as unnecessarily elitist. 😒
Funny AF how many women in the comments are thirsting for the litigants these days. I even saw one where they searched and found his social media page. Smdh 😂 after seeing that he is in court for scamming some woman. Just thirsty! 😢
@@ThisIsDjYigytugd You know absolutely nothing about me I would never call a tow truck on anyone and incur them that type of expense, you never know what people are going thru out here, and I would never put that burden on them , Snitching has never been apart of my DNA, so no I would never call a tow truck on some one, but what I would do is put a real serious note under their windshield wiper , letting them know to never ever do it again, anyone can make a mistake, always know that 💯
Played by who? The police issued the guy a ticket and the tow company towed. The ticket was dismissed based on someone else's judgement. The ticket was issued based on the police officer's judgement. We all make decisions everyday based on our judgement. Doesn't always work out in our favor, but at least the ticket was dismissed.
@@chynacash3138 I love a man draped in gold. Also men aging is a thing I’m not shallow his face is handsome if he loses his hair his face card still isn’t declining 💁🏽♀️
Sometimes, JM is very condescending at times. Why does the Plaintiff have to be lucky to have a tow ticket dismissed? The city clearly decided that the ticket was erroneous. It sounds like the school playground is set up to be accessible but it isn't an active driveway.
Why would he have to fight for someone else doing wrong (bc y'all $ hungry)? The tow company should get their money from the state for messing up. If you can't tow without a ticket.🤦🏿♀️😠😤😡🤬 Crooks & robbers all in it together & never I mean never likes to admit doing wrong. See how shocked she is she wants to kine exactly what he said so it won't happen again.🙅🏿♀️🙅🏿♀️🙅🏿♀️🙅🏿♀️🙅🏿♀️🙅🏿♀️👎🏿👎🏿👎🏿👎🏿👎🏿👎🏿👎🏿👎🏿
From the tow company's perspective, it was a legit tow. Those folks have to bring home a check, too. Imagine if you had to pay people out of your income because a third party may have made a mistake AND you only did what you were supposed to do. Nah, nothing fair about that.
The tow company doesn't want to risk losing their lucrative contract with the city. Would you sue the entity (city of NY) who picked your company to do business with over the dozens of other towing companies in the city? NYC probably pays them several hundred thousand bucks a year due the contract they have with them. If this tow company sues the city for $320, the city will not renew their contract and will select another tow company to work with instead. Would the lawsuit be worth it?
The reason why they don't save pictures cause they know they tow cars illegally ... not always but tow company's are sketchy aswell ... it's all about the money
The tow truck has a contract with the city. Judge should of had the Tow Truck company return the money and the tow truck company should attempt to sue the city, because they have the agreement with the city. She got it completely wrong. New York City has thousands of illegal "driveways" and homeowners must be fined. You can't just create a curb cut without permits, and say its a driveway. You have to file with the Building Department and the Dept of Transportation to get a legal driveway, and the zoning and setbacks have to allow it on your property.
Even if that was the case, the tow company can only tow a car if a police write a ticket for it and call them to tow. The tow company doesn't know the laws, they only know when they are contracted to tow. The judge of the case does though and can throw out a case (for a number of reasons, one might not be because it was an illegal parking job). They did a job without any negligence and shouldn't be responsible for something that is the police fault. The police should return the money, if it was ruled that it wasn't an illegal parking job. Just because the ticket was thrown out, doesn't mean that he was in the right as it could have still been an illegal parking job and the ticket (at the time of writing) was still valid.
Hes too cool for his own good. Shouldn't have winked his eyes and try to talk like a player. Just speak clearly bro stop trying to pimp talk. Might have won
Lmao how is he trying to talk like a pimp? Some of you say any thing, you and the idiots who liked your comment. Just go ahead and say he’s acting like a “nîgga” because that’s exactly what this comment is giving.
The more I watch her the more I don’t like this show she is reason judges, get a bad wrap she does not let you talk and she’s leading you to say what she wants to hear. Her mind is made up before you talk.
I would say no. One time I was about to park in a parking lot of a building that was no longer an active business. One of the employees of the restaurant next door that I was going to came out and told me that I would get towed if I parked there. It's not worth the risk.
Why isn’t the basic tow feed returned returned that he paid them and then the tow company sues the city of NY? The only people who got money was the tow company, they acted on NY say so. Everyone is made whole if plaintiff gets money back from who he gave it to. Tow company gets back money for the tow by the people who ordered it towed erroneously ..that’s what’s fair.
@@justinturner8278 I agree they did the work, but it was NY city’s fault and *they* should pay the tow company because according to the litigation they said the plaintiff did nothing wrong. Plaintiff shouldn’t be out of pocket and neither should the tow company who did the work. The one at fault is the city that put this in motion
@@zoeg7985hence why he should go to NYC for the fee back, as it was NYC fault for the tow, assuming the case was thrown out due to it not being an illegal tow. At the end of the day, the tow company didn't do anything wrong and should be paid for their work, but if there is negligence, it would be on NYC or NYPD to pay for the legal tow.
He's not ugly but.....fine? cute? 🤔 If one of my daughters brought him home, i'd give him a chance (because looks aren't everything, and he looks decent enough) and then he'd say - I've seen plenty of active driveways!.....
Nah the toe truck company should’ve given him his money back. Why should he have to chase NYC and sue; when the two companies that work together (nypd and the tower company) are the ones that got it wrong. Those two should’ve been up to date on what’s what and if not they should have to eat the fine/tow fee not the plaintiff .
The plaintiff even had a ruling in his favor by a judge yet Milian completely ignored it still screwed him out of his money. I've always talked about how racist Milian is and this is a definite indication as to why.
![🎤 จับฉลากร้องเพลง x P’ #XXSIVK [EP.1] (2/2) เพื่อนจับได้คำไหน..ต้องร้องคำนั้น เริ่ม! 💓🎶 #MXFRUIT](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/1bJvMJXmeS4/mqdefault.jpg)
Active Driveway sign is a real thing in NYC. Its typically for driveways in the middle of city streets
Exactlyyyy
I agree with the ruling. I wonder if he actually sued new york and won. He deserves his money back
I disagree with the ruling. I think he should have gotten his money back for the initial tow not the return tow. If another judge said there is no curb then how does the tow company keep the money? He should have gotten his money back and the tow company should have to chase NYC. The plaintiff is the one left holding the bag for their mistake.
New Yorker here: yes active driveways are a thing in NYC. If someone goes to the city and requests the city cut the curb in a spot that was not a driveway previously you will see ‘active driveway’ signs. Alternately people with driveways will post active driveway signs to deter drivers from parking.
Looking like a young Mase!!!😍😂
The plaintiff looks young & old at the same time 😂😮
😂😂😂
I love how she treats the Plaintiff like the defendant
The plaintiff has the burden of proof initially. 🤷🏾♂️
Defendant didn't really have to justify the tow until the plaintiff proves it was an illegal tow. Even with that letter, clearly he had the wrong defendant.
The past 22 years living at my property, I had over 2 dozen times my drivewy blatantly blocked. Vehicle has to be summoned first by either Traffic enforcement or NYPD before it can be towed at offenders cost here NYC. Its absolute hell if driveway blocked after 4pm and on Sundays because traffic enforcement no longer on clock in my area so NYPD takes FOREVER, obviously not a 911 priority. I always take pics all angles of Vehicle in reference to driveway. Of the 2 dozen times I only had 1 instance where owner came a hollering next day and quickly did a 180 when I showed him the pics. His wife parked the Vehicle and told her husband that she didn't block driveway.
Neither one of them understood the ruling 🤣 right over both their heads
"Let me see ya grill, let me see my what?" 🎶🎶
😂😂😂😂 oh Nelly
Lol
*does the chicken head dance*💃🏾
The plaintiff looks like the kid who played in Pootie Tang
“Kapa Chow” 😂😆🤣
Yes a younger version….LOL😀😃🤣😂
ACTIVE DRIVEWAY????????
good question what that is,
I’m from Queens New York and there is such thing as a active driveway sign I guess to influence people not to park there such as if it has a gate or if it doesn’t look like it’s a active driveway for some reason but it is or maybe it’s not but the owner just doesn’t want people parking there they can put up a sign that says active driveway.
You can’t block an active driveway. Why is that so confusing ?
@@christibarrick1768you can't block any driveway whether it's "active" or not
Some don't look like driveways, especially in busy cities. And some look like a driveway but may not be. I.e. it's a slot in front of a home but doesn't have a city permit for parking on it. You can't just make your own driveway.
He wasn’t wrongfully cited. The court just didn’t want to deal with him that day.
Hey lunch crew happy friday
Happy friday!! Lunch right now is fried beef over rice with ajvar - pepper & eggplant paste from the Balkans 😊
sounds goood! @@mirsan6705
Snow day in Colorado Springs., closed the base... 4 day weekend, yep yep....
@@mirsan6705 homemade chicken sammich, you showboat!!!😑
Happy Friday 🎉🎉
Plaintiff dressed like he's going to the local fleamarket
Love the judge
Very rare to successfully sue a tow company. They have far too many hoops to jump through to be in compliance with licensing laws and regs.
He came down to make sure his car was still there. He knew he was wrong blocking that driveway. And wth 🫤 is an ‘active driveway’ sign?
Happy Friday y’all!!!!
Have a good weekend people court famm!!😊
👋 👋 👋
Did you know?
Milian's new court show is Byron Allen produced,meaning it's
dramatized with actors rather than arbitration-based like People's Court?
Yes. And we have known this for months now….
People’s court had fake cases and actors too. All these court shows do.
I DIDNT KNOW BYRON ALLEN HAD ANYTHING TO DO WITH HER NEW SHOW! THANKS FOR THE FUN FACT
BUT I DEFINITELY KNEW THEY WERE ACTORS LIKE DEAF DUMB AND BLIND I KNEW THEY WERE "ACTORS"
Yep; same as Mathis' new show. Therefore, I'm avoiding both like the plague.
Yes….its absolutely an awful show
Is he wearing a grill??
Hell yeah he's got cheddar for all kinds o shite!!😂
Yep
Yes it's common in the south... I have permanent gold teeth. I live in Houston, Texas
@@christinagordon4460 how much for a temporary grill?
Why yes he is
so i wonder what the city of NYC lawsuit turned out to be
If he actually sued them, it probably costs him more than the tow. The city isn't responsible for him being too lazy to go pick up his own car. They are not going to pay for anything more than the cost of the original removal tow if they even paid that. Any amount over that was his own fault.
He won in court it was dismissed why is that so hard for judge milian to believe 🙄
It's hard to believe because the cops issued a ticket which means they were on scene and saw that he was illegally parked. He probably got it dropped because the issuing cop never showed up to court, not because he wasn't illegally parked still. Which that court still found that he was in violation, but they still dropped it due to who knows what (again, likely the cop not showing up to prove the ticket).
@reese7896 she is unbelievably unfair at times. He should have gotten the regular tow fee back, not the platinum package of course
@@meechee2too754 the tow company didn't do anything wrong, so he isn't entitled to his money back from them, though he may be from the city for allowing the tow.
@@ThisIsDjYigytugd it was a “close call” as Harvey said. The tow truck company even admitted they are sometimes told it isn’t a driveway and no ticket is issued. I would surmise this “close call” has happened before. Had it gone in favor of the plantiff which it sounds as if it should or could have. The tow truck company would have to then sue the city for the unnecessary tow. No one should be enriched by this tow. Yet the tow company is the only one who was.
@@meechee2too754 it was only a close call because he got the ticket dismissed. If it wasn't dismissed, then he'd have no right to a refund of tow. It being dismissed means that the tow shouldn't have been requested by the police, but that's the police fault, not the tow company. The company did what they were supposed to given the laws (police give ticket, police request tow). But the tow company didn't do anything wrong, hence why they don't have to give any money back. The police did by giving a ticket that wasn't valid (though we aren't sure if the ticket wasn't valid, the case could have been dismissed due to lack of evidence, not a bad ticket).
Whether it was a valid driveway or not is irrelevant to the tow company who is only supposed to tow when called and police ticket is given, which is what they did. If he was his money back after getting the ticket dismissed, it's on the city who gave the bad / false ticket.
The tow company did a job and should be paid for it. But it's not their fault that the city gave a bad ticket. The plaintiffs problem is with the city at this point.
Why would you even park in front or partially block a driveway
It’s obvious someone turned part of the block into a driveway and it wasn’t done by the city or permitted to be one. That’s why the ticket was thrown out
Those teeth! Active driveway???? He's delusional. He's so nervous because he knows he sounds like a fool. Once JM starts asking smart questions, he knows he doesn't seem too smart.
In NYC people use active driveway signs
You taught me something. A day is not wasted when you've learned something new 😁
weird how you automatically jumped to insults though …
He was nervous because she took the tow guys side automatically and assumed the guy was lying until she read the paper and then changed her tune. When this young black guy with golds try to use the justice system the correct way by being the plaintiff instead of the defendant he is still treated like a criminal. When in all actuality he was in the right and the police was in the wrong.
@@MrSexykay27It should be noted that the case being dismissed matters for why it was dismissed. It wasn't dismissed because it wasn't an illegal parking job, which matters because the only reason the police wrote the ticket is because it was. The only reason the tow company was called is because it was an illegal parking job determined by the cops.
The tow company didn't do anything wrong for the tow, but the police may have if the ticket wasn't valid, which that judge didn't say it wasn't, and still found him to be in offense. But that judge still dropped the case (for whatever reason).
That just means he doesn't owe money for the ticket, but it doesn't mean the tow wasn't valid. Hence why the judge was asking all those questions for why it got dropped and to see if the tow company was at any fault, which they weren't.
An "active driveway" sign??? More shenanigans
Because in NYC not all driveways are active and can be used for parking if they are not. Helps that not everyone who has a driveway, even has a car to use it.
So the city has an active driveway sign in some parts, such as possibly at this school, to prevent people from blocking it.
The court summary she read doesn't sound like it got thrown out for that though, so not sure why he brought that up
Active drive-way signs are an actual thing in NYC. That's why the city ultimately overturned his ticket.
What do you mean my "more"? Ugh.
JM love talking about things she didn't understand
Smart judge❤
His voice is nice!!! ❤
Perhaps the lot is so big that it has a secondary entrance near the actual entrance of the playground and that 1 is not in use therfore it's an inactive driveway.
That's not true, they towed my husband's car and never reported it.
It is stolen and lost to us.😊
Great ruling! The tow company was just doing their job. Unbelievable that the plaintiff couldn't understand that.
why would he understand that. is it his problem that they shouldnt have towed his car ? No, its between them and the city . so this nonsense that I have to understand that you are only doing your job that was ILLEGAL doesnt make any sense. If a cop tells you to tow someone car out of their own driveway illegally, wouldnt that still mean he was only doing his job of illegally towing someone car
!
If its not legal, then all contracts that follow are void. If he hired a lawyer, the lawyer would have stated that if the initial action is illegal, then everything that follows is illegal which means the tow truck would have to return the money and then sue the city to recoup whatever they thought they had lost. If he tries to sue the city, he will LOSE!... The fellow had no dealings with the city since the city wasnt the one that towed his car or collected on the tow...
This judge isnt good at her job but then again, this is not real court and is more similar to arbitration. It's the same as if a merchant sells something on a stolen credit card, he would have to return the funds to the bank and be out of the property to the thief since the action was illegal
I know someone that had their vehicle towed from a shopping mall plaza for no reason, stole everything in the vehicle (claiming there was nothing in there) and when the person went to get it out of the tow yard tried to charge them all these outrageous prices. I was watching the news and saw the same tow company under investigations for illegally towing cars and charging the owners to get their cars out (after stealing property inside). I told my friend and there was a major lawsuit (my friend won) and the company had to pay him over 5k in property damages and loses.
That’s what he gets for blocking a drive way. Who the fuck,Blocks a drive way.
it wasn't a drive way genius
It was a road way he blocked. Either way he blocked a roadway who the fuck does that.
MAYBE IN YOUR COUNTRY THEY DO
So y r u so mad
The judge was fascinated by this case and hear you 😮
@@Daydream355 It was a loading drive and no you can't block them. They use that driveway to unload the trucks for items the school purchased - food ect..
He needs to see a sign of a active driveway??? LMFAO what???
What DIFFERENCE does it make if his vehicle is *“Old enough to vote”?* 🙄 That didn’t have anything to do with the case, and comes across as unnecessarily elitist. 😒
I caught that too 🙄
J.m don't know everything because there's a lot of signs that says * active driveway *
Good luck soon the city I hope you have millions in your bank
Good luck with that case with NY🤦♀️.
He handsome tho 😂❤
oh wow
Well they were both good guys. I could see both sides.
Funny AF how many women in the comments are thirsting for the litigants these days. I even saw one where they searched and found his social media page. Smdh 😂 after seeing that he is in court for scamming some woman. Just thirsty! 😢
TOWING COMPANIES ARE THE WORST, SMDH 😡😡💯
Not all...this was a legit tow
You wouldn't be saying that if your driveway was blocked and you couldn't leave your home.
@@ThisIsDjYigytugd You know absolutely nothing about me I would never call a tow truck on anyone and incur them that type of expense, you never know what people are going thru out here, and I would never put that burden on them , Snitching has never been apart of my DNA, so no I would never call a tow truck on some one, but what I would do is put a real serious note under their windshield wiper , letting them know to never ever do it again, anyone can make a mistake, always know that 💯
@@keyeviondavis9647 whatever you say
Nice grills!
He should've won.. He got played.
Is English a second language??
Clear as day why he didn't win against the tow company....and I cannot stand tow companies.
Played by who? The police issued the guy a ticket and the tow company towed. The ticket was dismissed based on someone else's judgement. The ticket was issued based on the police officer's judgement. We all make decisions everyday based on our judgement. Doesn't always work out in our favor, but at least the ticket was dismissed.
They tow peoples cars because that’s how they make their money , sometimes they lose sometimes they win….,
What????????
The plaintiff is so cute 😍 I would have dismissed his ticket too😂
Yeah he had a cute face but the gold grill in his mouth and thinning hair threw it off for me 😭
@@chynacash3138 I love a man draped in gold. Also men aging is a thing I’m not shallow his face is handsome if he loses his hair his face card still isn’t declining 💁🏽♀️
HUH? Please visit optometrist
when i grow up, I want to be the announcer for the people's court so I can make punny joeks
Sometimes, JM is very condescending at times. Why does the Plaintiff have to be lucky to have a tow ticket dismissed? The city clearly decided that the ticket was erroneous. It sounds like the school playground is set up to be accessible but it isn't an active driveway.
That's on the cops.I think he was trying to say its not a registered driveway.The guys a bit thick
No, it's active driveway, which is a very specific rule in some parts of NYC.
Man the title maker for the videos had no enthusiasm with this one huh
Why would he have to fight for someone else doing wrong (bc y'all $ hungry)? The tow company should get their money from the state for messing up. If you can't tow without a ticket.🤦🏿♀️😠😤😡🤬 Crooks & robbers all in it together & never I mean never likes to admit doing wrong. See how shocked she is she wants to kine exactly what he said so it won't happen again.🙅🏿♀️🙅🏿♀️🙅🏿♀️🙅🏿♀️🙅🏿♀️🙅🏿♀️👎🏿👎🏿👎🏿👎🏿👎🏿👎🏿👎🏿👎🏿
Tow company should have paid him back and then gone after the state for their loss of profit.
Agreed
It's too much of a burden to put on citizens...that should be part of the contract with the city and the tow company that "they" hire.
From the tow company's perspective, it was a legit tow. Those folks have to bring home a check, too. Imagine if you had to pay people out of your income because a third party may have made a mistake AND you only did what you were supposed to do. Nah, nothing fair about that.
The tow company doesn't want to risk losing their lucrative contract with the city. Would you sue the entity (city of NY) who picked your company to do business with over the dozens of other towing companies in the city? NYC probably pays them several hundred thousand bucks a year due the contract they have with them. If this tow company sues the city for $320, the city will not renew their contract and will select another tow company to work with instead. Would the lawsuit be worth it?
The tow truck see the car then call one of his cop friends
I did not see anyone use it. Ok I have not seen anyone in that 2.5 million dollar vacation home so I can just use it it's cool no sign says I can't
The reason why they don't save pictures cause they know they tow cars illegally ... not always but tow company's are sketchy aswell ... it's all about the money
The plaintiff is SMOKIN’ HOT!!! ❤️❤️❤️
*15 SECONDS IN!!!! LMAO HE REALLY BROUGHT THIS TO COURT
Shes wayyy to aggressive, especially to *certain* litigants...ijs
The tow truck has a contract with the city. Judge should of had the Tow Truck company return the money and the tow truck company should attempt to sue the city, because they have the agreement with the city. She got it completely wrong. New York City has thousands of illegal "driveways" and homeowners must be fined. You can't just create a curb cut without permits, and say its a driveway. You have to file with the Building Department and the Dept of Transportation to get a legal driveway, and the zoning and setbacks have to allow it on your property.
Even if that was the case, the tow company can only tow a car if a police write a ticket for it and call them to tow. The tow company doesn't know the laws, they only know when they are contracted to tow. The judge of the case does though and can throw out a case (for a number of reasons, one might not be because it was an illegal parking job).
They did a job without any negligence and shouldn't be responsible for something that is the police fault. The police should return the money, if it was ruled that it wasn't an illegal parking job.
Just because the ticket was thrown out, doesn't mean that he was in the right as it could have still been an illegal parking job and the ticket (at the time of writing) was still valid.
Hes too cool for his own good. Shouldn't have winked his eyes and try to talk like a player. Just speak clearly bro stop trying to pimp talk. Might have won
Did you even watch the case? lol
Lmao how is he trying to talk like a pimp? Some of you say any thing, you and the idiots who liked your comment. Just go ahead and say he’s acting like a “nîgga” because that’s exactly what this comment is giving.
James what are you talking about ??? LOL
Wrong video James 😂
The more I watch her the more I don’t like this show she is reason judges, get a bad wrap she does not let you talk and she’s leading you to say what she wants to hear. Her mind is made up before you talk.
plaintiff gold grills be totally slammin
If a building is boarded up and non-functional can you park in their driveway?
I would say no. One time I was about to park in a parking lot of a building that was no longer an active business. One of the employees of the restaurant next door that I was going to came out and told me that I would get towed if I parked there. It's not worth the risk.
@@deemcgriff4196 Yeah, I agree. I think most cities need the money and will write tickets any chance they get.
Plaintiff is fine af👀
Why isn’t the basic tow feed returned returned that he paid them and then the tow company sues the city of NY? The only people who got money was the tow company, they acted on NY say so. Everyone is made whole if plaintiff gets money back from who he gave it to. Tow company gets back money for the tow by the people who ordered it towed erroneously ..that’s what’s fair.
Because the tow company did the work, as they were supposed to, and they deserve to get paid. It was the cities fault.
@@justinturner8278 I agree they did the work, but it was NY city’s fault and *they* should pay the tow company because according to the litigation they said the plaintiff did nothing wrong. Plaintiff shouldn’t be out of pocket and neither should the tow company who did the work. The one at fault is the city that put this in motion
@@zoeg7985hence why he should go to NYC for the fee back, as it was NYC fault for the tow, assuming the case was thrown out due to it not being an illegal tow. At the end of the day, the tow company didn't do anything wrong and should be paid for their work, but if there is negligence, it would be on NYC or NYPD to pay for the legal tow.
The plaintiff has the complexion for the connection in NYC.
Nah, that would be your White behind, and don't forget, your breatheren, the Jews.
He's not ugly but.....fine? cute? 🤔
If one of my daughters brought him home, i'd give him a chance (because looks aren't everything, and he looks decent enough) and then he'd say - I've seen plenty of active driveways!.....
Active driveways and inactive driveways are an actual thing in NYC. That's why his ticket was ultimately thrown out.
Dude got lucky.
😮
Nah the toe truck company should’ve given him his money back. Why should he have to chase NYC and sue; when the two companies that work together (nypd and the tower company) are the ones that got it wrong. Those two should’ve been up to date on what’s what and if not they should have to eat the fine/tow fee not the plaintiff .
Plaintiff does not want to admit he lied to the other judge to get the ticket dismissed by his cousin the Attorney......
This was a stupid comment. Why would he have to lie even in that picture it doesn’t look like an active driveway
$60.00 to pull it out of the yard. SCAMMER
The plaintiff 😉😍
Go after the city for 1.3 million and see what happens 😅
There’s a database that shows them LEGAL driveways.
Anyone with a neck tattoo has already lost.
Why is this judge racist , she behaves this way in a lot of her rulings
You can't use icloud on an android. She is making a bold assumption that everyone has an iPhone when in fact more people own androids.
They can still back up photos..
Either through Google or Samsung accts.
Gold chopper boy needs to man up.
Exactly
Nice teeth 😂
I know right!
I have a gold grill too 😊
Always the same people
Same ppl Chris Watts, SCOTT Peterson, David Temple, Karl Karlsen, JOSH POWELL RICHARD ALLEN, CHAD DOERMAN, Etc ETC
@@MissStevens1 when it’s a small group, you know them by name.
I welcome u to return to Europe where u make up most of the population 🤷🏽♀️
Them kind of people are lazy. And trying to get away a free tow
I bet you anything he was using the racism card. He's so entitled. It's disgusting.
I think we've found the anti-Adrian 🥴
WTF is racism? Your grandparents must have been BLACK 😂
Ghetto plaintive with the grill 👍
The plaintiff even had a ruling in his favor by a judge yet Milian completely ignored it still screwed him out of his money. I've always talked about how racist Milian is and this is a definite indication as to why.
He would have won if he had sued the right person. That's not racism
@@elizabeth95826 Exactly, some people don't think before writing nonsense
You're not a sharp individual whatsoever. We forgive your ailment.
its not the tow company's fault dummy.
Are you crazy, she explained why he lost. The tow company did there job, police give the ticket and then they were able to tow it.
Plaintiff dressed like he's going to the local fleamarket