Actually, I think Mangle's motive is actually a little different. During SaveThem, they are active and their file is named "hewashere." This would mean that they SAW the guard doing the DCI, giving them a proper reason to bite the dayshift guard.
this is flawed bc the animatronics can’t just kill you bc they allegedly saw u commit a crime, u need to have a police file. It’s likely SAVETHEM souls are the souls of the toys.
You are forgetting one thing. It's a bite, not a stabbing. Toy chica would have to stab the guard's head. while Mangle can just swoop down and bite the guard in the head / face. Plus Chica's beak doesn't look like it can open that far. And an adult head is larger than Chica's beak, by a long shot.
I think Toy Chica’s voiceline about her beak on your forehead was just a taunting message from her to William about the Bite of ‘83. This could be said with the Bite of ‘87 being caused by Mangle as well but pretty much I think this is Toy Chica’s way of saying “Hey, remember those two other guys who got their frontal lobes bitten off? You’re next, b*tch.”
Thats what ive been saying to people! We're playing as W.Afton after all. I also have seen other people call UCN not cannon but i dont really care. Mangle has more reason or theories that it did the bite, while tchica believers🤓 only relies on a single voiceline.
It was Mangle, *apparently* the former night guard Jeremy Fitzgerald, who you play as for the first two (I think, maybe just the first) nights. While he was on the day shift Mangle came off of the ceiling and bit his forehead (frontal lobe), mistaking him for William Afton. This is just what I’ve put together as a theory from some research I’ve done on it so don’t take it too seriously
The victim is most likely not Jeremy. The messages from FNAF2 are prerecorded from months ago, they were meant for someone a while ago. Jeremy was thus never moved to day shift, the person those messages were originally for was, and that person was likely the victim. The entire place is closed down for months, hence why the restaurant is a mess. Jeremy is just a night guard when the restaurant was planned to be reopened (before it was ultimately scrapped due to the animatronics still being too dangerius around the guards)
The message from mangle says it(mangle) has bitten a little boy and surely they wouldn't call a security guard little boy so it wouldn't have been mangles's fault actually
You have all most of everything right except it was toy chica who caused the bite of 87 and Jeremy fritzgerald was a cover up name for Michael afton and it’s the day gaurd that got bit when the bite was meant for William afton
The audio of mangle says theres there is A LITTLE BOY with no frontal lobe and the one who was bitten in the bite of 87 wasn't a little boy it was a security guard called jeremy + !I THINK! The books confirmed it was toy bonnie that did it
@@MaximilianPlayZ well since they do explain the afton lore i think yea btw I don't know well enough! Im just making opinions and expressing the facts i know! AND OF COURSE NO HATE MEANT totally friendly/gen
I don't think that's true most because the phone guy says the animatronics are fine around kids but are hostile towards the staff. With him even in saying to stay close to the animatronics, any would have likely stayed around the toy versions of Freddy, Bonnie, and Chica. And in order for mangles radio to be used as evidence that means that this is implying that The Bite of 87 already happened before your week which makes absolutely no sense as by the end of night 6 when phone guy is saying about how none of them are acting right and how a birthday is happening at that day along with telling you to stay close the animatronics the idea of one of them biting off somebody's frontal lobe in front of several kids and adults makes perfect sense as to why it closed down as the ending of night 6.
But mangle was a take apart and put together for children, and I don’t think there’s a child in mangle so mangle have every reason to cause the bite of 87.
The radio thing doesn't make much sense. The bite happened at the end of the week in fnaf. Also Scott said that he was just saying gibberish when recording Mangle's radio lol
i dont think it was mangle. her police radio described a little boy, Jeremy was the victim, who is a grown man. also, all toys animatronics have criminal database systems, meaning they all have access to police contact. mangle being so often torn apart means it's constantly playing. and the bite was committed near parts and service which is across the building from kids cove
My problem with it being Mangle is that it most likely happened when Jeremy was leaving the building but Mangle is so loud with the constant radio static Jeremy could easily avoid Mangle plus she probably isn't fast considering she doesn't have legs and crawls and climbs everywhere.
If Toy Bonnie had done it, the place would need three garbage bags, a shovel, some disinfectant, some latex gloves, and oregano! Theodore I can't go back to prison.
I don’t think it was Mangle, however I think it was foxy at the fnaf 1 location. Here’s the reason, mangle is technically a withered animatronic, and Jeremy would have been able to see mangle moving on the ceiling, and phone guy tells him to stay close the animatronics, most likely referring to the main stage. The reason I think it was foxy is because fazbear entertainment is known for being fast, meaning the could’ve reopened the 1985 location quickly. And when phone guy refers to the e animatronics being able to move around during the day, he is most likely talking about the fnaf 1 animatronics. It also explains why foxy is out of order. Also the fact that every lore event that was revealed in fnaf 1, has been confirmed to happen at that location except the bite, so it makes sense that it would’ve happened at that location as well. And the final reason is that it wouldn’t make sense for Scott to bring up an event that was planned for another FNAF when FNAF 1 was supposed to be his last game if it didn’t blow up.
Mangle has mistakened the dayshift guard that worked during summer for the purple guy who that night guard replaced after he left. Btw Jeremy is not the victim. In the night 6 news we see that toy animatronics are getting scrapped due to malfunction. So not because Jeremy got bitten. Also first night newspaper do not reffer to the toy animatronics as the brand new aninatronics, making me think that Grand Re opening is actually reopening the same fnaf 2 pizzeria after the bite and the murders happened during summer. I am down to debate edit: just wanted to remind you that Phone guy specifically told the nightguard to wear his uniform and stay close to the animatronics, and that he would take the nightshift when the place reopens, which he does in november explaining the #3 employee for Fritz Smith.
Yeah, everyone is correct. It is mangle Because when she jumps Scares you in fnaf She Literally Bites you in the head But It might be chika because she says. Hey, where's my beak right on your forehead
Honestly, I think it’s toy Bonnie considering toy Bonnie did it in the comics and sometimes they use stuff from the games into the comics also mango would be surrounded by kids and not able to bite the front lobe of Jeremy and then toy Freddy physically cannot bite off someone’s frontal lobe because he’s so fat so the best exclamation would be toy Bonnie, considering sharp teeth and the electronics can move Around the pizzeria, so that’s why I think toy Bonnie did it
Its definitely mangle but withered bonnie’s head is not removed for no reason. So i think Bonnie did the bite so they removed his head And if you think its wrong just tell me
a big indicator on why I believe it was toy bonnie is because why is the newer model of bonnie lacking a buck tooth, it's a trademark for any rabbit character to have. something telling me that it was due to the incident in which they just removed the front top tooth of the animatronics. Narratively it would be interesting, toy bonnie buck teeth is narrow enough to not completely destroy the human skull such as the case with foxy or mangle but isn't too broad to have a crushing effect like freddy's or fredbear, the chomp of 83.
its mangle. I have all of the evidence pointing to it. It can't be shadow Freddy, shadow Bonnie, or withered Golden Freddy because they are all super natural. I can't be The withered animatronics because they would have been deactivated during the time of the bite. (Also withered Chica and bonnie don't have properly functioning jaws) It can't be Balloon Boy because he doesn't have a functioning jaw. It can't be toy Freddy or Toy bonnie because they have small mouths so it would break their jaws if they tried to bite Jeremy. It can't be toy Chica because it would be more of a stab, not a bite. And even if she did take off her beak her endo teeth are inside her head so she couldn't bite anyone. It can't be The Puppet because, well its obvious. It can't be Endo 02 because it would be deactivated and even if it wasn't the other animatronics would try to stop it. that leaves only 1, Mangle... she can easily sneak up on Jeremy from above and bite down on his head.
There’s still the fnaf 1 animatronics, they existed since 1983 and the withereds became the fnaf 1 gang likelt around the same year.. but what makes it more obvious in my eyes is the fact that. There’s more and more imagery of fnaf 1 Freddy biting a person or so Like how in the movie Freddy bites somebody in half, or how out of everybody, Freddy has the hand detail despite the fact he shouldn’t have when the dead body in him had likelt already rotted away, not to mention the fact that Freddy rips his head almost in the fnaf 1 game and that in the rules, it’s said to stay away from Freddy I could be wrong but didn’t the restaurant close more so because the criminal database thingy just didn’t work out?
@@skelebonez1349 I explained that none of the withered could have done it and the toy animatronics were scrapped. If the withered animatronics would have been scrapped.
theres also one thing you forgot to mention when the phone guy in fnaf 1 said “its amazing how a human can survive without a frontal lobe “ something along the lines of that so basically it means the bite of 87 wasnt a death also when the cop called for 10-1 it either meant they had bad signal or hes in need of immediate help so that might add on to that as well
It was 100% mangle because I certainly don’t think a beak is strong enough to make someone loose a frontal lobe and mangle is the only animatronic that kids would get close to and she was a take apart and put back together animatronic.
The death voice line of toy chica could not have been used as evidence against chica because she was referring to *your* forehead and you are William afton and the bite victim was not William afton because he is not dead and ucn is Williams hell and since ucn is under the FNAF 6 location and it is only revealed after the events of FNAF 6 which is present day, it should to have been after the events of 1987 making toy chicas voice line just a hoax.
Yeah, but in fnaf 1 when you set the animatronics 1987, you get a GOLDEN FREDDY jumpscare. Golden Freddy is, well fredbear, the one who caused the bite of 83. This sh*ts confusing.
Tbh. Considering the animatronics from fnaf 1 existed since 1983… Freddy did it. It’s possible mangle could’ve done it admittedly, but I just see more stronger evidence for it to be Freddy. Fnaf 1 Freddy specifically That’s because of the fact that in the movie, Freddy does something similar to max. I don’t really remember fnaf 2 mentioning specifically that it was the specific place that had the fnaf 2 bite, For all we know it could’ve happened still in 1987 when the withered animatronics were reused for the fnaf 1 gang
Nah, y'all are wrong man, it of course was balloon boy! Proof: in the game files it says "bbdidit100%realsusamogus" if you reat the first it says bb did it Proof 2: he has big mouth, he can bite stuff big, like a head Proof 3: he literally is so scary like, look at the balloon Proof 4: he steals your battery Proof 5 on fnaf 4 (before fnaf 2 actually) his jumpscare is a bite Proof 6: yes Bros this is a joke and i made some stuff up
Here's some evidence for both Mangle and Toy Chica (If you have any other evidence for either character let me know) Mangle: His jaw seems large enough and his teeth seem sharp enough It feels correct from a storytelling standpoint: The broken down animatronic retaliating against an employee because the staff stopped fixing her (or just her being broken causes her to malfunction) Her jumpscare, obviously. The birthday party the bite happens on was probably for younger children, so it might have taken place in Kids Cove. Here's an idea of what could have happened: Some kid could have been messing with Mangle, and then Mangle tries to attack the kid. Bite Victim (Jeremy) tries to stop Mangle, but gets bit while doing so. (One thing to mention is that the Bite of 87 makes it so the animatronics aren't allowed to walk around during the day, so I don't see Fazbear Entertainment not just blaming the bite on the fact Mangle was broken, and continuing to let the properly functioning animatronics to walk around.) (I would also like the point out that Mangle's radio cannot be used as evidence due to the fact the radio is a stock sound, and even if it wasn't it would still be false since people think it says "He's definitely dead" and "Little boy" since the victim survived and the victim is most likely Jeremy, an adult.) Toy Chica: Although not confirmed, it feels likely that Mangle would be deactivated during the day so the kids could take him apart. Mangles mouth is too big to remove only the frontal lobe. It would probably destroy the entire face of the Victim (Jeremy) instead. And including all of this, the Victim (Jeremy) would also need to survive. Mangle isn't with the other animatronics, and Jeremy was probably with the main three if the birthday party was centered around them. Toy Chica's beak fits better to do damage focused in the frontal lobe. Toy Chica is active during the day. Scott has suspiciously said a lot about Toy Chica's beak. (But I guess that can be explained due to Scott leaning towards dream theory) Although not great proof, her UCN voice lines do imply that when she attacks she goes for the forehead, which is where the frontal lobe is.
I don't think there's any proof that fnaf 4 take place in 1983. A copyright date and a code don't mean anything. 1983 was when freddy's opened so that almost disproves that evidence. I think golden freddy caused the bite . When you put that code into vustom night it makes a golden freddy jumpscare
2:27 The one who was bitten in the bite of 87 wasn't a little boy it was a night guard called jeremy and the audio of mangle says theres A LITTLE BOY with no frontal lobe so its impossible that it was mangle + !I THINK! The books confirmed it was toy bonnie that did it
Look here me out but i think it maybe could be withered chica. Her jaw is like dislocated so that might mean something? Also it says that the toys have facial recognition so why would they attack a random person?
Couldn’t have been the withereds, they aren’t active in the day and sit in parts and service. The phone guy says to stick around the animatronics, meaning the active ones Also he says that someone may have tampered with their software
I don’t think it’s Mangle because the animatronics weren’t allowed to move after the bite of 87, so it has to be one of the animatronics being able to move, and because no kids were playing with Mangle, I don’t think they could be fixed with all kids being across the building and security guards probably protecting the area around the kids
It has to be Freddy, it had to have been fnaf 1 Freddy I swear there’s to much for it to point to Freddy from fnaf 1 Starting off, the fnaf 1 animatronics or at least their models existed since 1983 as evident through the coins. So they might’ve existed or at least had the models around the time when fnaf 2 closed But more so, the rules. Stay away from Freddy Also the movie, while I won’t exactly use complete proofC show how each animatronic kills. Chica often relies on her cupcake or other things to kill her victims Foxy seems to more so use his hook than to bite peoples heads Bonnie takes it the slow route and making it hella painful And got Freddy.. we see somebody get chomped in half. Also there wasn’t ever an explanation on the hand thing that Freddy has that nobody else had. It had to have been Freddy.
@@canimovepls I mean mangles a possibility, for all we know mangle might’ve moved like the rest of the guys Tho I do feel at least when fnaf 1 originally came out scott might’ve intended the guy who bit somebody to be Freddy with the many signs Heck in the movie we know only the classics currently existed by 1987,and considering what he was able to do to max He likely bit somebody Tho idk maybe the cupcake did it
Guys its mangle If you listen very carefully to mangle's radio static then you can hear people talking about a child missing its frontal lobe which means that mangle recorded sound after the bite occurred I'm guessing that the toys had a police recording system that would start to record sound when their facial recognition detects a criminal However because mangle is damaged the recording software is always active and doesn't respond to facial recognition so mangle was recording the sound the whole time
okay, theory time the bite of 83 NEVER happens, the 83 on the tv show is when the shows when the show started, the 1983 on the code is when fazbear entertainment became a large brand, or the show. or even the crying childs bday. because why would william have the year his son died as the code? see it makes more sense for the bite of 87 to be what kills the crying child. not to mention the fact that fnaf 4 WAS going to be the end of the series so why would scott add another question to the end of the game?
Sorry dude but this is completely wrong. 1. It’s literally stated that the victim of the Bite of 87 survived. In FNaF 4, the CC dies. We know this because his heart monitor stops beating at the end of Night 6. 2. Scott flat out de-confirms the narrative of the CC being the victim of the Bite of 87 from one of the episodes in Game Theory th-cam.com/video/e9FrNYjr3L4/w-d-xo.htmlsi=pGRZgHovzCa_TqvX (1:34)
the 1983 on the tv show is not really strong evidence for the year 1983, so i agree. But, William would definitely have reasons to put his son's death year as the key to the cameras as it is symbolic; he is researching down in the SL because he wants to get remnant to make his robots come to life, with his ultimate goal being to put CC back together. Also, I believe Michael is the player of FNAF 4 and it's his nightmares after being scooped; lots of evidence (it was definitely CC at the release of FNAF 4 but Scott retconned it to be Michael). According to you, the FNAF 4 minigames take place in 1987. If Fredbear's Family Diner was open and we saw Fredbear killing CC, why would the Toys be scrapped? Your own theory/timeline caused a loophole. Also, both the toys and the springlocks were decommissioned with WAYYYY too much time between each decommissioning, so there has to be 2 separate events; i.e. the springlock failures and the Bite of '83, and the Bite of '87 respectively. This is a ton of evidence to disprove you. Have a great day though :)
![CAMPปลิ้น | EP.82[1/2] แก๊ง 3 สาวเพื่อนซี้บุก CAMPปลิ้นครั้งนี้ห้ามเสียอาการ](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/_6WUjXHe1TM/mqdefault.jpg)
Actually, I think Mangle's motive is actually a little different. During SaveThem, they are active and their file is named "hewashere." This would mean that they SAW the guard doing the DCI, giving them a proper reason to bite the dayshift guard.
What is a DCI
@@relaxtube9670 Dead Children Incident, the one in the SaveThem minigame.
@@titan7789 oh
It could also be Withered Chica, her jaw is stretched/broken and she just looks the most terrifying.
this is flawed bc the animatronics can’t just kill you bc they allegedly saw u commit a crime, u need to have a police file.
It’s likely SAVETHEM souls are the souls of the toys.
You are forgetting one thing.
It's a bite, not a stabbing.
Toy chica would have to stab the guard's head. while Mangle can just swoop down and bite the guard in the head / face.
Plus Chica's beak doesn't look like it can open that far.
And an adult head is larger than Chica's beak, by a long shot.
It’s called the bite of 87 but it does not necessarily need to be a “bite” but maybe just damage to the frontal lobe.
@@JacksonGamer1that seems against the point of it having the word bite in it
@@JacksonGamer1then it would be "the incident of 87" instead of the BITE
I think Toy Chica’s voiceline about her beak on your forehead was just a taunting message from her to William about the Bite of ‘83. This could be said with the Bite of ‘87 being caused by Mangle as well but pretty much I think this is Toy Chica’s way of saying “Hey, remember those two other guys who got their frontal lobes bitten off? You’re next, b*tch.”
Thats what ive been saying to people! We're playing as W.Afton after all. I also have seen other people call UCN not cannon but i dont really care. Mangle has more reason or theories that it did the bite, while tchica believers🤓 only relies on a single voiceline.
@@bennisushuh? Are you talking about JUST Ucn. Cause if you are you are 100% correct
FINALLY TO PEOPLE UNDERSTAD. also lodged would be a stab. So yeah. Chica cant bite
In ucn she's talking to william
It was Mangle, *apparently* the former night guard Jeremy Fitzgerald, who you play as for the first two (I think, maybe just the first) nights. While he was on the day shift Mangle came off of the ceiling and bit his forehead (frontal lobe), mistaking him for William Afton. This is just what I’ve put together as a theory from some research I’ve done on it so don’t take it too seriously
The victim is most likely not Jeremy. The messages from FNAF2 are prerecorded from months ago, they were meant for someone a while ago. Jeremy was thus never moved to day shift, the person those messages were originally for was, and that person was likely the victim.
The entire place is closed down for months, hence why the restaurant is a mess. Jeremy is just a night guard when the restaurant was planned to be reopened (before it was ultimately scrapped due to the animatronics still being too dangerius around the guards)
The message from mangle says it(mangle) has bitten a little boy and surely they wouldn't call a security guard little boy so it wouldn't have been mangles's fault actually
@MossArch That's actually audio from a stock audio site so it sounding like it says that means nothing
You have all most of everything right except it was toy chica who caused the bite of 87 and Jeremy fritzgerald was a cover up name for Michael afton and it’s the day gaurd that got bit when the bite was meant for William afton
@@Dogdays_world95michael and jeremy is not the same person. After we played Jeremy for 5 nights(?), Fritz took over which was Michael.
I think it was definitely Mangle, I mean it only makes sense considering her Jumpscare, her motive, and the fact how she's just.... you know...
The audio of mangle says theres there is A LITTLE BOY with no frontal lobe and the one who was bitten in the bite of 87 wasn't a little boy it was a security guard called jeremy + !I THINK! The books confirmed it was toy bonnie that did it
@@MossArch Yea, but are the books really a reliable source for the games?
@@MaximilianPlayZ well since they do explain the afton lore i think yea btw I don't know well enough! Im just making opinions and expressing the facts i know! AND OF COURSE NO HATE MEANT totally friendly/gen
@@MossArch Yea, I mean no hate either, we're just expressing each other's opinions. :3
@@MaximilianPlayZ yeh :D
Mangle’s audio is a stock audio, there’s nothing hidden in it, people have been saying this for 9 years.
It's a mix of stock, it's not all stock.
Wait until another tales from the pizza plex book comes out and turns out balloon boy was the one who caused the bite 😂
After the movie I’m starting to get suspicious of BB….
What if everyone did it? What if everyone just decided to take a quick bite like a buffet?
That makes no sense bro
It'll turn be the bites of 87
@@HappyHomeYTits a joke loosen up a little 🥰
@@linqxx yeah but it won't make sense
@@linqxx it's was specifically cashed the bite of 87
The internet says Toy Bonnie but my heart says Mangle
I don't think that's true most because the phone guy says the animatronics are fine around kids but are hostile towards the staff. With him even in saying to stay close to the animatronics, any would have likely stayed around the toy versions of Freddy, Bonnie, and Chica. And in order for mangles radio to be used as evidence that means that this is implying that The Bite of 87 already happened before your week which makes absolutely no sense as by the end of night 6 when phone guy is saying about how none of them are acting right and how a birthday is happening at that day along with telling you to stay close the animatronics the idea of one of them biting off somebody's frontal lobe in front of several kids and adults makes perfect sense as to why it closed down as the ending of night 6.
But mangle was a take apart and put together for children, and I don’t think there’s a child in mangle so mangle have every reason to cause the bite of 87.
The radio thing doesn't make much sense. The bite happened at the end of the week in fnaf. Also Scott said that he was just saying gibberish when recording Mangle's radio lol
Scott didn't record the radio, he used a stock sound
@@MrFell.This proves that the audio isn’t saying anything and cant be shown as evidence
@@DandyBlae Yeah, exactly
i dont think it was mangle. her police radio described a little boy, Jeremy was the victim, who is a grown man. also, all toys animatronics have criminal database systems, meaning they all have access to police contact. mangle being so often torn apart means it's constantly playing. and the bite was committed near parts and service which is across the building from kids cove
My problem with it being Mangle is that it most likely happened when Jeremy was leaving the building but Mangle is so loud with the constant radio static Jeremy could easily avoid Mangle plus she probably isn't fast considering she doesn't have legs and crawls and climbs everywhere.
Yeah, Mangle can't walk, and the bite resulted in animatronics not being allowed to walk. So it being Mangle would make no sense.
If Toy Bonnie had done it, the place would need three garbage bags, a shovel, some disinfectant, some latex gloves, and oregano!
Theodore I can't go back to prison.
I feel like mangles evidence with the radio doesnt make much sensr because she doed it before the bite of 87 which happened at the end of the week
Also Scott said at one point that it’s stock audio
Funfact in the popgoes universe toy bonnie did do the bite of 87
I love how people think this. But no one did it. Cause his tears caused it😂😂😂
I think the Mangle did it. Mangle’s jaw is very wide, and the Bite of ‘87 would have been the reason why the toy animatronics were scrapped.
I think it was bouncepots
I don’t think it was Mangle, however I think it was foxy at the fnaf 1 location. Here’s the reason, mangle is technically a withered animatronic, and Jeremy would have been able to see mangle moving on the ceiling, and phone guy tells him to stay close the animatronics, most likely referring to the main stage. The reason I think it was foxy is because fazbear entertainment is known for being fast, meaning the could’ve reopened the 1985 location quickly. And when phone guy refers to the e animatronics being able to move around during the day, he is most likely talking about the fnaf 1 animatronics. It also explains why foxy is out of order. Also the fact that every lore event that was revealed in fnaf 1, has been confirmed to happen at that location except the bite, so it makes sense that it would’ve happened at that location as well. And the final reason is that it wouldn’t make sense for Scott to bring up an event that was planned for another FNAF when FNAF 1 was supposed to be his last game if it didn’t blow up.
It was Foxy.
Mangle has mistakened the dayshift guard that worked during summer for the purple guy who that night guard replaced after he left.
Btw Jeremy is not the victim. In the night 6 news we see that toy animatronics are getting scrapped due to malfunction. So not because Jeremy got bitten.
Also first night newspaper do not reffer to the toy animatronics as the brand new aninatronics, making me think that Grand Re opening is actually reopening the same fnaf 2 pizzeria after the bite and the murders happened during summer. I am down to debate
edit: just wanted to remind you that Phone guy specifically told the nightguard to wear his uniform and stay close to the animatronics, and that he would take the nightshift when the place reopens, which he does in november explaining the #3 employee for Fritz Smith.
Toy Bonnie
I caused the bite
Jeremy is little boy? 2:31
Sorry for the late reply, but no, Mangle's radio is stock audio that people tried to interpret but failed because there's no "hidden message"
There's two jeremys
@@canimoveplsJeremy Fitzgerald and his son, Jeremy Fitzgerald Jr.
@@ender01o66 when was that ever said
THATS FAKE! the bite of 87 caused toy bonnie because in scott cawton comic book the bite of 87 caused toy bonnie!
Yeah, everyone is correct. It is mangle Because when she jumps Scares you in fnaf She Literally Bites you in the head But It might be chika because she says. Hey, where's my beak right on your forehead
Nope, everyone was wrong.
Honestly, I think it’s toy Bonnie considering toy Bonnie did it in the comics and sometimes they use stuff from the games into the comics also mango would be surrounded by kids and not able to bite the front lobe of Jeremy and then toy Freddy physically cannot bite off someone’s frontal lobe because he’s so fat so the best exclamation would be toy Bonnie, considering sharp teeth and the electronics can move Around the pizzeria, so that’s why I think toy Bonnie did it
I think balloon boy did it
w h a t
@@ItsjustNJYT I mean he has to be the most evil animatronic out of all the characters in Fnaf 2, so it’s a possibility.
@@CGH404 Bro is literally harmless, he gives balloons to kids, and he likes to take battery's.
@@ItsjustNJYT yeah that’s why he’s evil you know how terrifying balloons are bro
@@CGH404 bruh 💀🗿
I think foxy did it my main people who did it is mangle chica foxy
Yeah, he did.
Y'all nvm toy chica or mangle did it
Its definitely mangle but withered bonnie’s head is not removed for no reason. So i think Bonnie did the bite so they removed his head
And if you think its wrong just tell me
Toy Chica's line was just The One He Shouldn't Have Killed taunting William Afton through her
Realistically one line isn't enough
a big indicator on why I believe it was toy bonnie is because why is the newer model of bonnie lacking a buck tooth, it's a trademark for any rabbit character to have. something telling me that it was due to the incident in which they just removed the front top tooth of the animatronics. Narratively it would be interesting, toy bonnie buck teeth is narrow enough to not completely destroy the human skull such as the case with foxy or mangle but isn't too broad to have a crushing effect like freddy's or fredbear, the chomp of 83.
its mangle. I have all of the evidence pointing to it.
It can't be shadow Freddy, shadow Bonnie, or withered Golden Freddy because they are all super natural.
I can't be The withered animatronics because they would have been deactivated during the time of the bite. (Also withered Chica and bonnie don't have properly functioning jaws)
It can't be Balloon Boy because he doesn't have a functioning jaw.
It can't be toy Freddy or Toy bonnie because they have small mouths so it would break their jaws if they tried to bite Jeremy.
It can't be toy Chica because it would be more of a stab, not a bite. And even if she did take off her beak her endo teeth are inside her head so she couldn't bite anyone.
It can't be The Puppet because, well its obvious.
It can't be Endo 02 because it would be deactivated and even if it wasn't the other animatronics would try to stop it.
that leaves only 1, Mangle... she can easily sneak up on Jeremy from above and bite down on his head.
There’s still the fnaf 1 animatronics, they existed since 1983 and the withereds became the fnaf 1 gang likelt around the same year.. but what makes it more obvious in my eyes is the fact that. There’s more and more imagery of fnaf 1 Freddy biting a person or so
Like how in the movie Freddy bites somebody in half, or how out of everybody, Freddy has the hand detail despite the fact he shouldn’t have when the dead body in him had likelt already rotted away, not to mention the fact that Freddy rips his head almost in the fnaf 1 game and that in the rules, it’s said to stay away from Freddy
I could be wrong but didn’t the restaurant close more so because the criminal database thingy just didn’t work out?
@@skelebonez1349 I explained that none of the withered could have done it and the toy animatronics were scrapped. If the withered animatronics would have been scrapped.
@@2GOOFYG00BERSmangle is also a withered animatronic, and people would have seen it move and go on the ceiling
no, mangle is a toy animatronic. he just became a take apart and put back together attraction.@@snakeeyes8678
I think toy bonnie did the bite because after he bit the daytime security guard, Jeremy lived on not as a person, but as Shadow bonnie Out of Agony.
why cant it be toy freddy
Hes hungry all the time but he was on the scene all the time
theres also one thing you forgot to mention when the phone guy in fnaf 1 said “its amazing how a human can survive without a frontal lobe “ something along the lines of that so basically it means the bite of 87 wasnt a death also when the cop called for 10-1 it either meant they had bad signal or hes in need of immediate help so that might add on to that as well
Well I think all different chica and all different foxy or mangle and Fred bear cause bite of 83 or bite of 87
Toy foxy no she didn’t cause a fight I think he did Chica it’s possible
I can see why foxy is on the list bro jumps out at the player
Why do you think he’s broken
It was 100% mangle because I certainly don’t think a beak is strong enough to make someone loose a frontal lobe and mangle is the only animatronic that kids would get close to and she was a take apart and put back together animatronic.
It was 100% not Mangle, lmao
What about circus, baby?
It was foxy
TOY FREDDY DID IT THATS THE REASON HE IS SO LARGE
The death voice line of toy chica could not have been used as evidence against chica because she was referring to *your* forehead and you are William afton and the bite victim was not William afton because he is not dead and ucn is Williams hell and since ucn is under the FNAF 6 location and it is only revealed after the events of FNAF 6 which is present day, it should to have been after the events of 1987 making toy chicas voice line just a hoax.
Fredbear did it cuz he obviously Chumps on the kid's head💪
It was Foxy
Mangle voice lines gave 79% eveidence
Yeah, but in fnaf 1 when you set the animatronics 1987, you get a GOLDEN FREDDY jumpscare. Golden Freddy is, well fredbear, the one who caused the bite of 83. This sh*ts confusing.
Team mangle caused the bite of 87
👇🏾(Kids will say I’m begging for likes😊)
Tbh. Considering the animatronics from fnaf 1 existed since 1983…
Freddy did it.
It’s possible mangle could’ve done it admittedly, but I just see more stronger evidence for it to be Freddy. Fnaf 1 Freddy specifically
That’s because of the fact that in the movie, Freddy does something similar to max.
I don’t really remember fnaf 2 mentioning specifically that it was the specific place that had the fnaf 2 bite,
For all we know it could’ve happened still in 1987 when the withered animatronics were reused for the fnaf 1 gang
Foxy did it.
If Chica was on stage she would have a beak her beak can't open that much so a child's head wouldn't fit
but she was giving pizza on partys so yeah
And magle wouldt had chance to bit her mask is too long
I think mangel
The crying child has no confirmed nameeee EVAN IS A FAN NAMEEEE
Wait this is a mystery? Oh shit sorry I thought you guys all knew. I did it. Nom nom.
it’s toy bonnie. He caused the bite of 87.
Bouncepot:
1:16 that's a Fredbear plush
Nah, y'all are wrong man, it of course was balloon boy!
Proof: in the game files it says "bbdidit100%realsusamogus" if you reat the first it says bb did it
Proof 2: he has big mouth, he can bite stuff big, like a head
Proof 3: he literally is so scary like, look at the balloon
Proof 4: he steals your battery
Proof 5 on fnaf 4 (before fnaf 2 actually) his jumpscare is a bite
Proof 6: yes
Bros this is a joke and i made some stuff up
Hi
@@tayloranderson7547 hi
Yes
Some people said that she’s gonna did Chica caused the bite of 87
IT WAS MANGLE HOW ARE PEOPLE STILL NOT GETTING IT
whoever caused it, kid's lucky, they got a lobotomy for free!
The bite of 87 was Abraham Lincoln
But Mangal did caused the bite of 87
If you type 1987 u get a golden Freddy jumpscare
It was a main goal he caused the bite of 87
mangle or foxy did it
Yeah, Withered Foxy.
Here's some evidence for both Mangle and Toy Chica (If you have any other evidence for either character let me know)
Mangle:
His jaw seems large enough and his teeth seem sharp enough
It feels correct from a storytelling standpoint: The broken down animatronic retaliating against an employee because the staff stopped fixing her (or just her being broken causes her to malfunction)
Her jumpscare, obviously.
The birthday party the bite happens on was probably for younger children, so it might have taken place in Kids Cove. Here's an idea of what could have happened: Some kid could have been messing with Mangle, and then Mangle tries to attack the kid. Bite Victim (Jeremy) tries to stop Mangle, but gets bit while doing so.
(One thing to mention is that the Bite of 87 makes it so the animatronics aren't allowed to walk around during the day, so I don't see Fazbear Entertainment not just blaming the bite on the fact Mangle was broken, and continuing to let the properly functioning animatronics to walk around.)
(I would also like the point out that Mangle's radio cannot be used as evidence due to the fact the radio is a stock sound, and even if it wasn't it would still be false since people think it says "He's definitely dead" and "Little boy" since the victim survived and the victim is most likely Jeremy, an adult.)
Toy Chica:
Although not confirmed, it feels likely that Mangle would be deactivated during the day so the kids could take him apart.
Mangles mouth is too big to remove only the frontal lobe. It would probably destroy the entire face of the Victim (Jeremy) instead. And including all of this, the Victim (Jeremy) would also need to survive.
Mangle isn't with the other animatronics, and Jeremy was probably with the main three if the birthday party was centered around them.
Toy Chica's beak fits better to do damage focused in the frontal lobe.
Toy Chica is active during the day.
Scott has suspiciously said a lot about Toy Chica's beak. (But I guess that can be explained due to Scott leaning towards dream theory)
Although not great proof, her UCN voice lines do imply that when she attacks she goes for the forehead, which is where the frontal lobe is.
I searched it and it say toy bonnie
Nope it wasn’t a toy Bonnie
I don't think there's any proof that fnaf 4 take place in 1983. A copyright date and a code don't mean anything. 1983 was when freddy's opened so that almost disproves that evidence. I think golden freddy caused the bite . When you put that code into vustom night it makes a golden freddy jumpscare
We're told the bite happened in 1983.
@@ender01o66 where?
2:27 The one who was bitten in the bite of 87 wasn't a little boy it was a night guard called jeremy and the audio of mangle says theres A LITTLE BOY with no frontal lobe so its impossible that it was mangle + !I THINK! The books confirmed it was toy bonnie that did it
Guess what the books ain’t canon and maybe mangle has somehow the police report of the bite of 83
@@vortex164no one really knows if the books are canon or nor
3:33 how does your game look like that?
its an animation
MANGLE
FOXY
Look here me out but i think it maybe could be withered chica.
Her jaw is like dislocated so that might mean something? Also it says that the toys have facial recognition so why would they attack a random person?
Couldn’t have been the withereds, they aren’t active in the day and sit in parts and service.
The phone guy says to stick around the animatronics, meaning the active ones
Also he says that someone may have tampered with their software
@@TheRandomWolf Yeah now that you say that it doesn't make sense for it to be the withereds. It was just a random theory I thought up on the spot 🤷♀️
Feddy fazbenda
Canon, Fazbender42
I don’t think it’s Mangle because the animatronics weren’t allowed to move after the bite of 87, so it has to be one of the animatronics being able to move, and because no kids were playing with Mangle, I don’t think they could be fixed with all kids being across the building and security guards probably protecting the area around the kids
It has to be Freddy, it had to have been fnaf 1 Freddy
I swear there’s to much for it to point to Freddy from fnaf 1
Starting off, the fnaf 1 animatronics or at least their models existed since 1983 as evident through the coins. So they might’ve existed or at least had the models around the time when fnaf 2 closed
But more so, the rules. Stay away from Freddy
Also the movie, while I won’t exactly use complete proofC show how each animatronic kills.
Chica often relies on her cupcake or other things to kill her victims
Foxy seems to more so use his hook than to bite peoples heads
Bonnie takes it the slow route and making it hella painful
And got Freddy.. we see somebody get chomped in half.
Also there wasn’t ever an explanation on the hand thing that Freddy has that nobody else had. It had to have been Freddy.
@@skelebonez1349what about mangle
@@canimovepls I mean mangles a possibility, for all we know mangle might’ve moved like the rest of the guys
Tho I do feel at least when fnaf 1 originally came out scott might’ve intended the guy who bit somebody to be Freddy with the many signs
Heck in the movie we know only the classics currently existed by 1987,and considering what he was able to do to max
He likely bit somebody
Tho idk maybe the cupcake did it
@@skelebonez1349Had to be Foxy
I love it
Hiiiiii😂
I personally love the idea of Freddy causing the bite cuz that would explain the slightly visible bloody hand print on his face
It's ai generated Scott says so
@@HappyHomeYT I was talking about the bite
@@decomposingdave2902 still it needs to also connect with Scott's conditions
@@HappyHomeYT I said I like the idea and concept of Freddy causing the bite wtf are you talking about
Freddy didn’t even exist when the bite of 87 happened, at least not Fnaf 1 freddy
It was BB
in the end it was the puppet
Fredber made the ,,Bite of 87"
Not of 83 you mean?
Guys its mangle
If you listen very carefully to mangle's radio static then you can hear people talking about a child missing its frontal lobe which means that mangle recorded sound after the bite occurred
I'm guessing that the toys had a police recording system that would start to record sound when their facial recognition detects a criminal
However because mangle is damaged the recording software is always active and doesn't respond to facial recognition so mangle was recording the sound the whole time
okay, theory time the bite of 83 NEVER happens, the 83 on the tv show is when the shows when the show started, the 1983 on the code is when fazbear entertainment became a large brand, or the show. or even the crying childs bday. because why would william have the year his son died as the code? see it makes more sense for the bite of 87 to be what kills the crying child. not to mention the fact that fnaf 4 WAS going to be the end of the series so why would scott add another question to the end of the game?
because he’s a deranged killer who kills children and stuffed their bodies into suits
Sorry dude but this is completely wrong.
1. It’s literally stated that the victim of the Bite of 87 survived. In FNaF 4, the CC dies. We know this because his heart monitor stops beating at the end of Night 6.
2. Scott flat out de-confirms the narrative of the CC being the victim of the Bite of 87 from one of the episodes in Game Theory th-cam.com/video/e9FrNYjr3L4/w-d-xo.htmlsi=pGRZgHovzCa_TqvX
(1:34)
the 1983 on the tv show is not really strong evidence for the year 1983, so i agree.
But, William would definitely have reasons to put his son's death year as the key to the cameras as it is symbolic; he is researching down in the SL because he wants to get remnant to make his robots come to life, with his ultimate goal being to put CC back together. Also, I believe Michael is the player of FNAF 4 and it's his nightmares after being scooped; lots of evidence (it was definitely CC at the release of FNAF 4 but Scott retconned it to be Michael).
According to you, the FNAF 4 minigames take place in 1987. If Fredbear's Family Diner was open and we saw Fredbear killing CC, why would the Toys be scrapped? Your own theory/timeline caused a loophole.
Also, both the toys and the springlocks were decommissioned with WAYYYY too much time between each decommissioning, so there has to be 2 separate events; i.e. the springlock failures and the Bite of '83, and the Bite of '87 respectively. This is a ton of evidence to disprove you.
Have a great day though :)
forgot i made this comment 😛😛😛
The bite of 87 victim survives. The crying child doesn’t. Put the pieces together
It was fredbear, if you think otherwise your wrong
Ha! I get the meme!
Who are you? Donald Trump? XD (It's a joke, because you said "wrong")
Withered Freddy or mangled, both having a decent amount of evidence supporting both.
Tell
@@canimoveplsWithered Foxy
@@ender01o66 withered foxy would've been in parts and service so can't be him
@@canimovepls It was confirmed that it was him.
@@ender01o66 where
i think it was whitered bonnie
How, lol
@@ender01o66 its a joke
I agree