Did Dinosaurs Really Go Extinct?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ก.ย. 2024
  • Welcome to… Jurassic Pluck
    Subscribe: bit.ly/iotbs_sub Twitter: @DrJoeHanson @okaytobesmart
    ↓ More info and sources below ↓
    Most people are taught that dinosaurs went extinct 66 million years ago when a giant meteor crashed into the Yucatan peninsula. I'm here to tell you that's wrong. Dinosaurs are alive and well today, and you don't have to go to Jurassic World to see them (although hanging out with Chris Pratt would be cool)
    We have living dinosaurs all around us. We just call them "birds". Yes. Birds are dinosaurs.
    Viewers like you help make PBS (Thank you 😃) . Support your local PBS Member Station here: to.pbs.org/PBS...
    The tetrapod playlist: • Playlist
    Special thanks to Scott Hartman (www.skeletaldra...) for the great Deinonychus and Archaeopteryx illustrations
    More info/sources:
    Great Audubon article on dinosaur-bird evolution www.audubon.org...
    Dig deeper with this hour-long Yale lecture by Dr. Richard Prum: • 10/8/05 Richard Prum ...
    Dr. John Hutchinson's research on dinosaur/bird posture
    whatsinjohnsfre...
    Chickens wearing prosthetic tails, for science!
    journals.plos.o...
    T. rex had a wishbone: www.smithsonian...
    Did prey grasping of dinosaurs evolve into bird flight stroke? www.ucmp.berkel...
    Reconstructing dinosaur sounds www.sandia.gov/...
    Great TED-Ed video on the evolution of feathers in dinosaurs: • How did feathers evolv...
    Brian Switek on dinosaur feathers: www.smithsonian...
    What do birds see? www.nwf.org/new...
    Tetrachromacy and feathers in dinosaurs: www.sciencemag....
    Have an idea for an episode or an amazing science question you want answered? Leave a comment or check us out at the links below!
    Follow on Twitter: / okaytobesmart
    / drjoehanson
    Follow on Tumblr: www.itsokaytobe...
    Follow on Instagram: / drjoehanson
    Joe Hanson - Creator/Host/Writer
    Joe Nicolosi - Director
    Amanda Fox - Producer, Spotzen IncKate Eads - Associate Producer
    Andrew Matthews - Editing/Motion Graphics/Animation
    Katie Graham - Director of Photography
    John Knudsen - Gaffer
    Theme music: "Ouroboros" by Kevin MacLeod
    Other music via APM
    Stock images from Shutterstock, stock footage from Videoblocks
    Birds of paradise clips via PBS Nature

ความคิดเห็น • 4.2K

  • @Moonbeam143
    @Moonbeam143 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3010

    Remember, kids. When the bully from school calls you a chicken, just remember that chickens come from dinosaurs, and you can just eat that bully's face any time you want.

    • @cubiccrowgoji8353
      @cubiccrowgoji8353 9 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Kk

    • @unvergebeneid
      @unvergebeneid 9 ปีที่แล้ว +98

      Moonbeam ... that chickens _are_ dinosaurs ...

    • @husboy1
      @husboy1 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      GojiPlayz56 KKK

    • @megasupreme9985
      @megasupreme9985 8 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      +alhanaei a They evolved from dinosaurs, and they are dinosaurs! Theyre just a new spiecies...

    • @unvergebeneid
      @unvergebeneid 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Joshua Lowrie Maybe two new species.

  • @wheezywaiter
    @wheezywaiter 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3251

    A giant rooster is more terrifying than a T. rex.

    • @besmart
      @besmart  9 ปีที่แล้ว +291

      Helluva wake-up call too

    • @zeiitgeist
      @zeiitgeist 9 ปีที่แล้ว +55

      Guess nobody ever heard of a cockatrice.

    • @Blasteroid01
      @Blasteroid01 9 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      zeiitgeist The Mythological Chicken-Lizard beast?

    • @zeiitgeist
      @zeiitgeist 9 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      Blühende Blume Yes, the giant feathered chicken lizard thing that breathes fire.

    • @Blasteroid01
      @Blasteroid01 9 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Oh yeah, it breathes fire, that too.

  • @connorhalleck2895
    @connorhalleck2895 8 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    Holy crap this intro was phenomenally well done! Props to whoever put that together

  • @SallyLePage
    @SallyLePage 9 ปีที่แล้ว +59

    This is such a good episode! Just the combination of great graphics and editing and breadth of content was fab!

    • @besmart
      @besmart  9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Sally Le Page Thanks Sally!

  • @chipthedino9504
    @chipthedino9504 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It’s causes in that time feathers were not known so they just kept the scales

  • @himexh._
    @himexh._ 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You are fear me in 3:22

  • @christiandiaz2354
    @christiandiaz2354 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dinosaurs to Chicken always gets me 😂 🤦‍♂️

  • @itzmonkeygamez4844
    @itzmonkeygamez4844 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    If i hear the word ‘dinosaur’ i think about jurassic world

  • @garygorospe6454
    @garygorospe6454 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1471

    Safe to say that the asteroid robbed us of some epic fried chicken..

    • @arrowsaurus7561
      @arrowsaurus7561 4 ปีที่แล้ว +85

      Huge drumsticks

    • @r.i.t.i.k.a
      @r.i.t.i.k.a 4 ปีที่แล้ว +66

      Or saved us from being epic fried not-so-chicken chicken

    • @Wyamerkz
      @Wyamerkz 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      😂😂

    • @eternity801
      @eternity801 4 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      KFC
      KFD

    • @alfianfahmi5430
      @alfianfahmi5430 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Beefy chicken

  • @jacoblofthus7908
    @jacoblofthus7908 4 ปีที่แล้ว +317

    So, in a sense, Alfred Hitchcock's The Birds was the original Jurassic Park.

    • @alexwuntch3368
      @alexwuntch3368 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      This comment needs more recognition.

    • @omnitato6988
      @omnitato6988 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@alexwuntch3368 100%

    • @ChristmasLore
      @ChristmasLore 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Today the idea of the movie could seem dumb, yet the suspense is real and the movie is great.
      Saw it as a kid and never really liked birds , long before I learned they were dinosaurs.

    • @louf7178
      @louf7178 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Totally different.

    • @karlosdaniel6537
      @karlosdaniel6537 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@ChristmasLore Observation: birds ARE dinosaurs.

  • @ratatouille1682
    @ratatouille1682 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1342

    So, KFC should be changed into Kentucky Fried Dinosaurs.

    • @ink1929
      @ink1929 8 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      Kfd, could also be Kentucky fried dodo

    • @ink1929
      @ink1929 8 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      Kfd, could also be Kentucky fried dodo

    • @josephcrespo7822
      @josephcrespo7822 7 ปีที่แล้ว +37

      Rata Touille KFD
      although people might confuse it for Kentucky Fried Dicks
      XD

    • @sammoylivermore9784
      @sammoylivermore9784 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Rata Touille kfd Lol

    • @maranofan8759
      @maranofan8759 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Rata Touille ha that's funny lol

  • @Wayoftheclay
    @Wayoftheclay 3 ปีที่แล้ว +193

    "i'm so glad birds don't have teeth anymore"
    me, thinking of geese: "You sure?"

    • @richardblazer8070
      @richardblazer8070 3 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      Geese don't technically have teeth, they have tomia, keratin serrations lining their bills and mouths.

    • @Wayoftheclay
      @Wayoftheclay 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@richardblazer8070 oh that's neat! Still terrifying though XD

    • @sdfsdf5924
      @sdfsdf5924 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      E
      T9,q8aop

    • @Lalaloopsies_United
      @Lalaloopsies_United 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Goosanders: U forgot me

    • @rockroll9761
      @rockroll9761 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I have teeth

  • @Krustenkaese92
    @Krustenkaese92 9 ปีที่แล้ว +284

    "NOT AS SCARY?"
    A giant chicken is pretty scary ... I already am afraid of the normal ones ..

    • @IonianGarden
      @IonianGarden 9 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      ***** Cassowaries have killed people.

    • @ghuegel
      @ghuegel 9 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      ***** Do you know about terror birds? Those things were horrifying, and they died out only about 2.5 million years ago.

    • @godzilloid
      @godzilloid 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      ***** Got that right. Velociraptors with feathers. Check out Jacanas as well.

    • @ariyatahasin3632
      @ariyatahasin3632 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Me too

    • @fantasaurus9178
      @fantasaurus9178 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Dave Power #6 But terrorbirds were actually herbivores

  • @ScrapPalletMan
    @ScrapPalletMan 6 ปีที่แล้ว +699

    I like the ending, they are not LIKE dinosaurs they ARE dinosaurs. Good stuff

    • @SeelTheDealArt
      @SeelTheDealArt 5 ปีที่แล้ว +78

      @Martin G lmao then what's YOUR answer since apparently the most scientifically plausible theory is completely false

    • @jeanscuissiato135
      @jeanscuissiato135 5 ปีที่แล้ว +51

      @Martin G Good joke hahahaha

    • @Dexuz
      @Dexuz 5 ปีที่แล้ว +52

      @Martin G
      I love how your only argument is saying: "Sorry, It's false"
      In that case here is my argument.
      God isn't real.

    • @BestBibleStories
      @BestBibleStories 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      They are not dinosaurs. That's such a stupid thing to say. How does anyone with a brain believe the stupidity presented in this video. Watch it again and see if one single fact is presented. There are no facts presented in this video. Nothing but fantastical opinions.

    • @emilengen7825
      @emilengen7825 5 ปีที่แล้ว +54

      @Martin G evolution is a fact.

  • @sparkles-kun2225
    @sparkles-kun2225 8 ปีที่แล้ว +417

    Honey! a dinosaur hit the window again!

  • @nikitanallaian5119
    @nikitanallaian5119 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1155

    So....... We humans eat chickens, who’re actually Dinasaurs. Which means we tiny guys eat the once strongest predators on the planet? Savage.

    • @doggocat4464
      @doggocat4464 6 ปีที่แล้ว +31

      K. Reimin
      No, because birds aren’t “the strongest predators.” Ik this is a joke, but I just wanna clarify dinosaurs aren’t all preds.

    • @rinsiblerelic5318
      @rinsiblerelic5318 6 ปีที่แล้ว +80

      TAC TIMES I’m tired of you, just shut the frick up.

    • @doggocat4464
      @doggocat4464 6 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      K. Reimin
      No, he responded to dozens of comments with this same exact copy-paste message.

    • @rinsiblerelic5318
      @rinsiblerelic5318 6 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      K. Reimin it’s just kind of annoying that if you look on almost all of the comments that are saying the exact same thing over and over again spamming

    • @doggocat4464
      @doggocat4464 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      RinsibleRelic - Gaming, Geckos, Hedgehogs and more!
      Especially since they’re wrong.

  • @redboot8
    @redboot8 4 ปีที่แล้ว +129

    "You'll never look at birds the same way" - Dr. Alan Grant, jurassic park

  • @dapperparraper860
    @dapperparraper860 7 ปีที่แล้ว +142

    actually some goose species have teeth and some even have them on their tongue

    • @arrowsaurus7561
      @arrowsaurus7561 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Dapper Parraper wtf I’m scared lol

    • @blondbraid7986
      @blondbraid7986 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      I didn't think they were teeth, more like serrated edges on their beaks.

    • @metagiga7626
      @metagiga7626 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      thanks, i hate it

    • @moopig9220
      @moopig9220 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      thats horrifying

    • @Derrick-1209
      @Derrick-1209 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      i have anatidaephobia now

  • @famous1240
    @famous1240 9 ปีที่แล้ว +219

    HOLY MOLY, I ATE A DINOSAUR THIS MORNING.

    • @doggocat4464
      @doggocat4464 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I JUST ATE A COW ...
      oh wait.

    • @SMAB2007
      @SMAB2007 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I'm addicted to dinosaur flesh specifically from the carnivorous saurischains because for some reason, sauropods are saurischains and not ornithischains like every other herbivorous dinosaur. This explains why Spinosaurus is my favourite dinosaur.

    • @dundee6402
      @dundee6402 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Goku Sonfan Why do you eat meat in the morning....

    • @FirstNameLastName-fd7ks
      @FirstNameLastName-fd7ks 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Goku Sonfan LOL

    • @EddieLacefield
      @EddieLacefield 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      MrAsiris23 eggs are not meat😂

  • @hs0003
    @hs0003 9 ปีที่แล้ว +579

    ... I wouldn't mind a chicken of that size. Imagine how much meat there would be on a chicken wing!

    • @RayPoreon
      @RayPoreon 9 ปีที่แล้ว +78

      Emil Tang The muscles would need to be strong enough to support it's entire weight, so the meat would be tough and chewy.

    • @RoScFan
      @RoScFan 9 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Kinky Fish Which is my favorite kind

    • @RayPoreon
      @RayPoreon 9 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      RoScFan **Perv face**

    • @hs0003
      @hs0003 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Kinky Fish Wouldn't a chicken that size simply not fly at all? Chickens can barely fly at their current size anyway.

    • @RayPoreon
      @RayPoreon 9 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Emil Tang Err...what? No-one mentioned flight.

  • @jackshenhouse
    @jackshenhouse 5 ปีที่แล้ว +61

    I've said for years my chickens are yard dinosaurs...

  • @roguedogx
    @roguedogx 7 ปีที่แล้ว +154

    so does this mean a T-Rex tastes like chicken? I'm sorry I'll leave now.

    • @zachandalex7989
      @zachandalex7989 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      😂😂

    • @1joshjosh1
      @1joshjosh1 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Are you serious

    • @BestBibleStories
      @BestBibleStories 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      th-cam.com/video/U2OwT6ZUKOU/w-d-xo.html

    • @NRooster
      @NRooster 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@BestBibleStories bruh

    • @Burritosaurus
      @Burritosaurus 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@BestBibleStories SHUT UP YOU UNEDUCATED BASTARD

  • @eternalpain232
    @eternalpain232 7 ปีที่แล้ว +85

    So you're telling me the national bird of the US is a dinosaur? Dope.

    • @Galiant2010
      @Galiant2010 5 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      Well... ANY national bird is...

    • @bigmac3373
      @bigmac3373 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @Ameen Shindoli they are not lizard but giant killer bird

    • @jonhohensee3258
      @jonhohensee3258 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      All national birds would be.

  • @captainstroon1555
    @captainstroon1555 7 ปีที่แล้ว +122

    Imagine a flying Dinosaur with wings. Sounds badass? It's called a bird.

    • @Demonicidiot
      @Demonicidiot 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Captain Stroon XD

    • @NighthawkX02
      @NighthawkX02 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Now imagine an eagle, a vulture, a hawk, or one of those giant patrels if they were the size of an elefant or even the size of a car. You wouldn't want to step outside...

    • @mtf8396
      @mtf8396 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Captain Stroon ever heard of pterosaurs?

    • @unclefreddieDied
      @unclefreddieDied 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      like pterodactyl? never knew it started with a P

    • @donareisya2286
      @donareisya2286 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      uncle freddie Pterosaurs are flying reptiles NOT dinosaurs

  • @F15_C
    @F15_C 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    (thumbnail for context) THEY ARE STILL *WHAT?*
    ⠀⠀⠀⡯⡯⡾⠝⠘⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢊⠘⡮⣣⠪⠢⡑⡌
    ⠀⠀⠀⠟⠝⠈⠀⠀⠀⠡⠀⠠⢈⠠⢐⢠⢂⢔⣐⢄⡂⢔⠀⡁⢉⠸⢨⢑⠕⡌
    ⠀⠀⡀⠁⠀⠀⠀⡀⢂⠡⠈⡔⣕⢮⣳⢯⣿⣻⣟⣯⣯⢷⣫⣆⡂⠀⠀⢐⠑⡌
    ⢀⠠⠐⠈⠀⢀⢂⠢⡂⠕⡁⣝⢮⣳⢽⡽⣾⣻⣿⣯⡯⣟⣞⢾⢜⢆⠀⡀⠀⠪
    ⣬⠂⠀⠀⢀⢂⢪⠨⢂⠥⣺⡪⣗⢗⣽⢽⡯⣿⣽⣷⢿⡽⡾⡽⣝⢎⠀⠀⠀⢡
    ⣿⠀⠀⠀⢂⠢⢂⢥⢱⡹⣪⢞⡵⣻⡪⡯⡯⣟⡾⣿⣻⡽⣯⡻⣪⠧⠑⠀⠁⢐
    ⣿⠀⠀⠀⠢⢑⠠⠑⠕⡝⡎⡗⡝⡎⣞⢽⡹⣕⢯⢻⠹⡹⢚⠝⡷⡽⡨⠀⠀⢔
    ⣿⡯⠀⢈⠈⢄⠂⠂⠐⠀⠌⠠⢑⠱⡱⡱⡑⢔⠁⠀⡀⠐⠐⠐⡡⡹⣪⠀⠀⢘
    ⣿⣽⠀⡀⡊⠀⠐⠨⠈⡁⠂⢈⠠⡱⡽⣷⡑⠁⠠⠑⠀⢉⢇⣤⢘⣪⢽⠀⢌⢎
    ⣿⢾⠀⢌⠌⠀⡁⠢⠂⠐⡀⠀⢀⢳⢽⣽⡺⣨⢄⣑⢉⢃⢭⡲⣕⡭⣹⠠⢐⢗
    ⣿⡗⠀⠢⠡⡱⡸⣔⢵⢱⢸⠈⠀⡪⣳⣳⢹⢜⡵⣱⢱⡱⣳⡹⣵⣻⢔⢅⢬⡷
    ⣷⡇⡂⠡⡑⢕⢕⠕⡑⠡⢂⢊⢐⢕⡝⡮⡧⡳⣝⢴⡐⣁⠃⡫⡒⣕⢏⡮⣷⡟
    ⣷⣻⣅⠑⢌⠢⠁⢐⠠⠑⡐⠐⠌⡪⠮⡫⠪⡪⡪⣺⢸⠰⠡⠠⠐⢱⠨⡪⡪⡰
    ⣯⢷⣟⣇⡂⡂⡌⡀⠀⠁⡂⠅⠂⠀⡑⡄⢇⠇⢝⡨⡠⡁⢐⠠⢀⢪⡐⡜⡪⡊
    ⣿⢽⡾⢹⡄⠕⡅⢇⠂⠑⣴⡬⣬⣬⣆⢮⣦⣷⣵⣷⡗⢃⢮⠱⡸⢰⢱⢸⢨⢌
    ⣯⢯⣟⠸⣳⡅⠜⠔⡌⡐⠈⠻⠟⣿⢿⣿⣿⠿⡻⣃⠢⣱⡳⡱⡩⢢⠣⡃⠢⠁
    ⡯⣟⣞⡇⡿⣽⡪⡘⡰⠨⢐⢀⠢⢢⢄⢤⣰⠼⡾⢕⢕⡵⣝⠎⢌⢪⠪⡘⡌⠀
    ⡯⣳⠯⠚⢊⠡⡂⢂⠨⠊⠔⡑⠬⡸⣘⢬⢪⣪⡺⡼⣕⢯⢞⢕⢝⠎⢻⢼⣀⠀
    ⠁⡂⠔⡁⡢⠣⢀⠢⠀⠅⠱⡐⡱⡘⡔⡕⡕⣲⡹⣎⡮⡏⡑⢜⢼⡱⢩⣗⣯⣟
    ⢀⢂⢑⠀⡂⡃⠅⠊⢄⢑⠠⠑⢕⢕⢝⢮⢺⢕⢟⢮⢊⢢⢱⢄⠃⣇⣞⢞⣞⢾
    ⢀⠢⡑⡀⢂⢊⠠⠁⡂⡐⠀⠅⡈⠪⠪⠪⠣⠫⠑⡁⢔⠕⣜⣜⢦⡰⡎⡯⡾⡽

    • @MB32904
      @MB32904 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      (bum) bum bum bum bum bum bum bum... badumbum

  • @Silmerano
    @Silmerano 9 ปีที่แล้ว +47

    So if i'm understanding this correctly. There is a very strong possibility. That dinosaurs were delicious.

    • @GnosticGnoggin
      @GnosticGnoggin 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I wanted to replied to the situation of t by e monarchy holdinnn

    • @jonhohensee3258
      @jonhohensee3258 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Stephen - You didn't pay attention to the video.

  • @PeregrineX7
    @PeregrineX7 9 ปีที่แล้ว +283

    What would the actual muscles and flesh of dinosaurs have been like? In other words, would they taste like chicken?

    • @laurencegido8653
      @laurencegido8653 9 ปีที่แล้ว +76

      Peregrine JESUS CHRIST PEOPLE PLS ANSWER THIS GUY.

    • @Singleraxis
      @Singleraxis 9 ปีที่แล้ว +72

      Red, as they're heavy and needed a lot of oxygen to energize their muscles, which requires a lot of blood. I'm not an expert, but I've read somewhere that birds got white meat for endurance and light weight. High likely that it tasted more like beef.

    • @isodoublet
      @isodoublet 9 ปีที่แล้ว +39

      Singleraxis is probably correct. Ostrich meat tastes similar to beef.

    • @pro-methean4121
      @pro-methean4121 9 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Maybe somewhere between ostrich and crocodile meat

    • @SocramOlrak
      @SocramOlrak 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      +Singleraxis wrong , they do not were heavy , hollow bones and air sacs inside like the birds ,

  • @zenmaster8826
    @zenmaster8826 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Amogus

  • @hello-mw9tz
    @hello-mw9tz 7 ปีที่แล้ว +182

    Apparently, T-Rex was meant to of had feathers, which personally makes it even more terrifying.

    • @ryoushii
      @ryoushii 6 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Yeah, think a giant kiwi with a rat tail and a mouth full of 6 inch teeth.

    • @themeddite
      @themeddite 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Ryoushi Anschauer it looked more like a mane

    • @maximaldinotrap
      @maximaldinotrap 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@ryoushii Giant Cassowary

    • @maximaldinotrap
      @maximaldinotrap 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@aravdogra4192 Actually with some of the imprints we have found showing scales I wouldn't be surprised if the rex were slightly feathered more towards the backside.

    • @HyperionaSilverleaf
      @HyperionaSilverleaf 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      More like a giant chicken.

  • @OutlawMaxV
    @OutlawMaxV 9 ปีที่แล้ว +45

    So my grandmother is Dinosaur farmer

  • @kolportiroas-red983
    @kolportiroas-red983 7 ปีที่แล้ว +58

    Well in 1993 the theory of dinosaurs having feathers wasn't as strong as today so what they do is now their just continuing without the feathers so it not weird how they just randomly get feathers.

    • @Blue_Anzu
      @Blue_Anzu 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Finally, someone understands

    • @xdrazormon454
      @xdrazormon454 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No wonder why I used to think that velociraptors might’ve well evolved into 🦎 but nope they are related to birds 🦅

    • @StefanVeenstra
      @StefanVeenstra 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      JP scientists also used amphibian dna to fill up the holes in broken dino dna. Afaik, there are no feathery amphibians. So the continuation of featherless or proto plumage dinosaurs makes sense.
      On another note, while the Velociraptors are assumed to be Mongoliensis because of the supposed location the DNA was found, it's actually based off Velociraptor Antirrhopus aka Deinonychus.
      So the size discrepancy often brought up is a non-argument too.

    • @christopherdinoguy8346
      @christopherdinoguy8346 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      JP was still ahead of it's time as doctor Grant actually acknowledged the fact that velociraptors were more like birds and less like other reptiles, also he acknowledged that brachiosaurus and other dinosaurs were warm blooded.

  • @myklmyers
    @myklmyers 4 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    “Life finds a way”

    • @shylogik
      @shylogik 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      “Life Uh, finds a way”

  • @StudioSambodia
    @StudioSambodia 9 ปีที่แล้ว +83

    wish your videos were like an hour long, I can watch these all day.

    • @graveserpent
      @graveserpent 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I feel you there.

    • @oldanddeadaccountsumfurryc1359
      @oldanddeadaccountsumfurryc1359 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ok, dinosaurs had feathers uh-huh some dinosaurs fly.. There were birds, they didn’t fuse into them, did you even listen or even watch it?

    • @rinsiblerelic5318
      @rinsiblerelic5318 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      TAC TIMES this wasn’t even related to the dinosaurs 🤬

    • @kawaiicosplayer6423
      @kawaiicosplayer6423 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Same

  • @MattRieckman
    @MattRieckman 8 ปีที่แล้ว +214

    Actually, many dinosaurs being feathered was not an agreed upon conclusion when the first two Jurassic Park movies were made, not becoming widely discussed intil the late 90s, and not being widely accepted until the 2000s, AFTER Jurassic Park III was made. And Velociraptor itself wasn't confirmed to have feathers until 2007, well after the films were made.
    The first book itself actually explicitly had a deliberately built-in loop hole for scientific inaccuracies which was discussed, and argued about by the characters, in the book. The scientists didn't know what the DNA was, so they found out by growing it and seeing what they got. When it wasn't what they expected or wanted, they tweaked the DNA and grew another dino from it. So since it was based on their expectations, it naturally wouldn't be accurate. This was not discussed in the first three films but got mentioned in a very clearly laid our rant by Dr. Wu in Jurassic World complaining about being forced to make the park dinosaurs look "cooler".
    And... the Velociraptor itself was not the Velociraptor mongoliensis mentioned in this video, but a new species (created by the park scientists), in the same genus, called Velociraptor antirrhopus that was actually based on Deinonychus antirrhopus in the books (due to a, now rejected, idea being mulled over at the time that the two species were in the same genus) and the newly discovered but unnamed (at the time) species Utahraptor ostrommaysorum in the movies. Which nearly got called Utahraptor spielbergi in honor of the film.

    • @maxrenauldo8604
      @maxrenauldo8604 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      good info

    • @awesomeanth
      @awesomeanth 8 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      But Jurrasic World has no excuse!

    • @Trinexx42
      @Trinexx42 8 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Actually, it does. Remember at the end of the movie they said that all of their dinosaurs are modified to look cooler. So the "Velociraptors" in the movie have had their feathers genetically removed to look cooler.

    • @awesomeanth
      @awesomeanth 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      +Nevan Lowe I meant that they can't say that "this is 100% velociraptor" and they have to make up dumb excuses to make there Dinos not fluffy.

    • @debonairdinosaur8435
      @debonairdinosaur8435 8 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      +Anthony Di Santo bruh... in the movies they specifically talk about how the their dinosaurs are different than the prehistoric dinosaurs because they had to use DNA of living animals like frogs to complete the various DNA sequences.

  • @tee-sam-ee-red
    @tee-sam-ee-red 3 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    3:06 The most hilarious experiment was actually when scientists put ants on stilts to see if they counted their steps

    • @cuca_
      @cuca_ 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      And do they?

    • @tee-sam-ee-red
      @tee-sam-ee-red 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@cuca_ they do

  • @nikolasrpak6187
    @nikolasrpak6187 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    They are still AMONG US 😳😰📕$U$

    • @AurisMochi
      @AurisMochi 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      SUS

    • @MB32904
      @MB32904 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      sussy

  • @leezanda8430
    @leezanda8430 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    AMOGUSSSSS

    • @MB32904
      @MB32904 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      sussy

  • @thearchivist3610
    @thearchivist3610 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Kinda sus thumbnail

    • @MB32904
      @MB32904 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      among sus

  • @LeapyGeck
    @LeapyGeck 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Oh god , the dinos , they have learned to play amogus

    • @MB32904
      @MB32904 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      sussy

  • @kedixsed7095
    @kedixsed7095 4 ปีที่แล้ว +39

    So... Since flying birds are relatives of dinosaurs, that kind of makes them....
    Dino-soars!
    😁

    • @Kevin-ci4ky
      @Kevin-ci4ky 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      。-。

    • @Raison_d-etre
      @Raison_d-etre 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Not really. Dinosaurs are a clade, so everything that came from dinosaurs are dinosaurs, by definition. Fish are not a clade, so even though humans came from fish, we're not fish.

    • @christopherherr7561
      @christopherherr7561 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@Raison_d-etre Come off it, he's just having some fun.

    • @jonhohensee3258
      @jonhohensee3258 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@christopherherr7561 - It's stupid.

    • @MB32904
      @MB32904 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Raison_d-etre wait, so nothing is a fish?

  • @debonairdinosaur8435
    @debonairdinosaur8435 8 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    XD was so confused on the opening sketch ddnt realize it was Joe, I was like, Who the hell is that guy? I dnt remember him being in jurassic park XD

  • @c3ru1ean41
    @c3ru1ean41 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    among us

    • @MB32904
      @MB32904 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      sus

  • @shafqatishan437
    @shafqatishan437 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    2:20 Deinoychus was not a scaly reptile either. It was a warmblooded heavily feathered raptor.

    • @archive2500
      @archive2500 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Facts. It was very active if that is the case.

  • @Joegargalini
    @Joegargalini ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Me reading thumbnail: don’t laugh, don’t laugh

  • @Kram1032
    @Kram1032 9 ปีที่แล้ว +57

    Waait what? mammals are technically "older" than reptiles? I always thought that was the other way round.

    • @besmart
      @besmart  9 ปีที่แล้ว +75

      Kram1032 To put it most accurately, the *common ancestor* of all mammals branched off back then, that's not quite the same as saying mammals suddenly sprang into being

    • @Kram1032
      @Kram1032 9 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      It's Okay To Be Smart well I suppose so but I thought the common ancestor of mammals came after the common ancestor of reptiles. Or to say it differently, that there already have been "proto-reptiles" which later branched off into actual reptiles and "proto-mammals".
      But apparently not?

    • @Rationalific
      @Rationalific 9 ปีที่แล้ว +60

      Kram1032 Both reptiles and mammals split off from basal amniotes. As these basal amniotes started diverging, they started to resemble what we see today. But actually, these two lineages split off at exactly the same time (and this is a necessary part of cladistics). You could say that "mammals are older than reptiles", but that's not really true, as the ancestors of mammals and the ancestors of reptiles split at exactly the same time. And really, what is a mammal? Dimetrodon, the reptile-like synapsid, is actually on the "mammal" side of the synapsid/sauropsid divide. But that doesn't mean it was a mammal. If you include it as a mammal (which it isn't), then it's older than the dinosaurs. But if you include the proto-dinosaurs with the dinosaurs, then they go back farther, too. This is similar to how a lungfish is more related to a dog than to a shark. But a lungfish is not a dog, of course...just like proto-mammals (basal synapsids) were not mammals. (Anyway, you are correct that animals _resembling_ reptiles in form were around before animals resembling mammals in form, although some _reptile-like animals_ were actually on the line to becoming mammals...or in most cases dying off without leaving descendants.) I hope this helps! Also, feel free to check this out:
      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amniote#Cladogram

    • @Kram1032
      @Kram1032 9 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Rationalific​ I see, that makes sense. Thanks for this detailed explanation :)

    • @Rationalific
      @Rationalific 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Kram1032 No problem!

  • @katecleary8290
    @katecleary8290 6 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Honestly I ALREDY knew that they didn’t go extinct but I wanted to hear him talk about it anyway

  • @plefevre
    @plefevre 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    It's become my life's work now correcting this error. Nothing "GOES" extinct. Things "BECOME" extinct. Being extinct is a 'state' that a species reaches, they don't 'go there', it's not a place. Using the verb 'go' with extinction is like saying "I lost my job so I went depressed". You would always say "I lost my job so I became depressed". Tell your friends.

    • @lightninlad
      @lightninlad 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Who was that masked man?

    • @suelane3628
      @suelane3628 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Isn't pedantry fun!

  • @nanabberry965
    @nanabberry965 5 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Even with feathers dinosaurs have a very Distinct and unique feel to them. I surprisingly like both 'versions' of the idea of the Dinosaurs alot.

  • @AtomicBacon568
    @AtomicBacon568 9 ปีที่แล้ว +58

    It's Okay To Be Second

  • @themarsquatch420
    @themarsquatch420 8 ปีที่แล้ว +72

    ARK Survival Evolved brought my childhood interest in dinosaurs back stronger than ever.

    • @talih7200
      @talih7200 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      same

    • @lucaskebow1781
      @lucaskebow1781 8 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Too bad it isn't scientifically accurate in its portrayals of the animals. I suppose it's up to the player to decide if they want to study further I suppose!
      Still a fun game though.

    • @BestBibleStories
      @BestBibleStories 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Dinosaurs did not evolve into birds. Anyone who says so is either stupid or lying. It's so sad to see nearly 2 million people are subscribed to such ridiculous nonsense. Feel free to subscribe to my channel if you have any interest in truth.

    • @oldanddeadaccountsumfurryc1359
      @oldanddeadaccountsumfurryc1359 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Idk if that will make anyone sub to you if you say “Anyone who says that is either stupid or lying” that’s not nice.

    • @Lilitu4242
      @Lilitu4242 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      TheDodoEnthusiast yussssss ark is amazing I am addict to it

  • @dojokonojo
    @dojokonojo 8 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    This video was criminally short. We need more dino-birds in our lives.

  • @Galiant2010
    @Galiant2010 5 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    When the asteroid showed up all the dinos disappeared. The asteroid, who had been hoping for a good fight, asked the locals "What are you chicken?"

    • @Dexuz
      @Dexuz 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Ameen Shindoli Those are the reptilians, dinosaurs aren't reptiles, try again.

    • @paulusrafaelis4337
      @paulusrafaelis4337 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Dexuz wait, they are not reptiles?

    • @Dexuz
      @Dexuz 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@paulusrafaelis4337 No they aren't the thing ks that reptile is not a taxonomical name at all, the scientifical community doesn't use it because its unnacurate.
      Dinosaurs are related to birds, not to lizards.

    • @paulusrafaelis4337
      @paulusrafaelis4337 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Dexuz so whats the right taxonomical name for them?

    • @DINO_X65
      @DINO_X65 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@paulusrafaelis4337 dinosaurs, there are no other taxonomical names for them as they are their own clade, because if dinosaurs were reptiles then so would mammals be since mammals evolved from reptiles

  • @Yahriel
    @Yahriel 8 ปีที่แล้ว +58

    boy am I glad Canada geese don't have teeth.

    • @Blue_Anzu
      @Blue_Anzu 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Actually chickens (I'm not sure if they're the only birds) have teeth and claws at one point when they're developing in the egg

    • @jasonrustandi5692
      @jasonrustandi5692 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Technically, that's not true. Chickens only develop teeth when the talpid2 gene expresses itself in the embryo. The problem is that talpid2 is lethal and the embryo is automatically terminated before birth.

    • @uncletammy5025
      @uncletammy5025 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      I hate geese normally.

    • @frapiichino
      @frapiichino 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      SkyWolfAlpha where I live geese do have teeth. I felt it on my butt once ;-; still scared of water birds.

    • @jessicalee333
      @jessicalee333 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      They DO have teeth. The also have teeth on the sides of their tongues. The inside of a goose's mouth is terrifying.

  • @poochthedog1
    @poochthedog1 6 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    5:30 polly want a lawyer 😂😂😂😂😂

  • @SPACE.KITTY.
    @SPACE.KITTY. 9 ปีที่แล้ว +54

    Yes! I love this video! When my dad rescued a baby duck I told people that we had a baby dinosaur. :)
    Anyway, want more proof that birds are dinosaurs? Look up the Hoatzin. It's a bird that's alive today that is still born with claws! It looses its claws by adulthood, but as a baby it uses them to climb, which is helpful in case it falls out of its nest into the water that it lives above. Isn't that so cool! :D

    • @gustavoramos4557
      @gustavoramos4557 9 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Just googled it and the scientific names is Opisthocomus hoazin. They are indeed awesome and look like phoenixes lol

    • @SPACE.KITTY.
      @SPACE.KITTY. 9 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Gustavo Ramos Oh my god, they do! I never noticed that before! To me they look like dinosaurs during the transition to birds.

    • @craigyoungman8493
      @craigyoungman8493 9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Cool! I've never seen those before! Thanks! Hey, have you ever seen the claws on a plucked ostrich/emu wing? Check this out: blogs.scientificamerican.com/tetrapod-zoology/ratites-in-trees-the-evolution-of-ostriches-and-kin-and-the-repeated-evolution-of-flightlessness-ratite-evolution-part-ii/

    • @SPACE.KITTY.
      @SPACE.KITTY. 9 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      craig youngman Holy shit! I had no idea there were still clawed adult dinosaurs! This makes me so happy! :D

    • @robinchesterfield42
      @robinchesterfield42 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Never heard of those things before but yeah...almost like a baby Archaeopteryx! (Well not quite, but you know what I mean.) As for ostriches...you ever seen one of those things in person? ONE good look at a bird at that size, with the same scaly legs they've always had but scaled way up from the little brown birds on your porch, and you don't have to be told by scientists--you KNOW you're in the presence of a dinosaur.
      I mean, technically you are every time you're near any bird ever...but you know what I mean. Make it bigger, walking, and even _shaped_ like some dinosaurs (Struthomimus aka _ostrich mimic_, anyone?) and suddenly bam! a big ugly mean bird becomes a dino with a fluffy bit in the middle. :)

  • @eggvedeon
    @eggvedeon 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    AMONG US??? SUS!!!

    • @MB32904
      @MB32904 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      sus

  • @bagandtag4391
    @bagandtag4391 8 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    Kawaii Dinosaurs!
    Come on Japan, I'm waiting

  • @TheCommexoKidMusic
    @TheCommexoKidMusic 8 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    geese are all the proof you need

    • @EddieLacefield
      @EddieLacefield 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Sister Hecate they are EVIL

    • @Zenigotcha
      @Zenigotcha 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Seagulls are more evil

    • @a-aronpre-sent1447
      @a-aronpre-sent1447 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hissing bastards.

    • @Damian-cilr2
      @Damian-cilr2 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      i mean they dont have true teeth but close enough
      still TERREFYING

  • @mischarowe
    @mischarowe 4 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    This explains how the cuccos in the legend of zelda can kill you so easily.

  • @WHOOOSHXDOfficial
    @WHOOOSHXDOfficial 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Dinosaurs are _AMONG US_ 😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖😳😳😳😳😳🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖

  • @L96KIING
    @L96KIING 8 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    65 million years ago lol. He needs to learn a lot from ken ham

    • @SocramOlrak
      @SocramOlrak 8 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      +DOUBLEAGENTcity sarcasm?

    • @L96KIING
      @L96KIING 8 ปีที่แล้ว +31

      +Karlo Marcos Reyes lol yes

    • @SocramOlrak
      @SocramOlrak 8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      DOUBLEAGENTcity xD

    • @MikhaelAhava
      @MikhaelAhava 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      It isn't exactly 65, its different in some books (65.5) and...

    • @SocramOlrak
      @SocramOlrak 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Miguel pmpm the asteroid impacted 67 my
      Big animals start to going to extintion between the impact and after the Mesozoic
      Yes, we had land's runners crocodilians after the KT and maybe some non avian dinos survive few time after that mark of 65 my
      But.... mammal's revolution and unfavorable conditions let to their extintion
      Time to enjoy eating our past treat , chicken 😎 it tastes like dinosaur , smell like a dinosaur , it is classified as a dinosaur....
      Just enjoy the juice of revenge!!!

  • @breadmusic1
    @breadmusic1 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    That means dino nuggets are made of real dinosaur meat

    • @MonsieurWeevil
      @MonsieurWeevil ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It indeed does. Thanks for planting that thought in my head.

    • @jgthejason8089
      @jgthejason8089 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Dinosaurs would’ve tasted more like beef or crocodile, just because there related to birds doesn’t mean there the exact same.

    • @shattermelon496
      @shattermelon496 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@jgthejason8089nope. Birds ARE dinosaurs.

    • @jgthejason8089
      @jgthejason8089 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@shattermelon496that’s not the point of the comment, I meant as a reply dinosaurs would have tasted more like red meat, at least the bigger ones, despite them being much closer to birds, but their meat wasn’t the exact same.

  • @willvr4
    @willvr4 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I can't believe you did that. I've always made jokes about how Jurassic park would be way less scary if the T-rex sounded like a chicken because there really is no accurate way to know what they sounded like and it's their closest ancestor.

  • @rcarmisin3465
    @rcarmisin3465 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Alligators and Komodo look alikes were around when dinosaurs were alive. Sloths and beavers were 20 feet tall once upon a time.

  • @ClubSealing
    @ClubSealing 9 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    I'm being nit-picky but: In the beginning of the video he says turtles were more related to lizards and snakes (lepidosaurs), but this is only one hypothesis, and there is so much recent evidence placing them with (or as a sister taxon to) archosaurs. There are so many hypotheses to turtle phylogeny, too, so it kinda makes me uncomfortable to see a science video try and state something like that as fact when scientists are constantly butting heads about it.
    Anyway, it's not the main point of the video, but it kinda urks me lol.
    (Also you guys talk about archeopteryx as a transition from other more dinosaur-y theropods and modern birds, but it wasn't even technically a bird. I think there's evidence now that birds are more closely related to velociraptors? Could be wrong with that one, though.)

    • @lythronax-argestes
      @lythronax-argestes 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Well, _Archaeopteryx_ is more closely related to birds than it is to _Velociraptor_. Search up a phylogeny of Maniraptora.

    • @ClubSealing
      @ClubSealing 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Maybe in some phylogenies. I'm not an expert in that subject (hence the "i think" part), but I had an ornithologist tell me there was recent evidence that velociraptors were more closely related to modern birds. Phylogeny changes over time with more evidence, so who knows.

    • @lythronax-argestes
      @lythronax-argestes 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      The _current scientific consensus_ is that _Archaeopteryx_ is more closely related to birds. I wouldn't trust an ornithologist; they generally don't have a lot of background in palaeontology.

    • @ClubSealing
      @ClubSealing 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      That's fine but considering I stated it as a "could be wrong, not sure" statement and admitted I didn't know a lot about it, you probably could have responded with a bit less attitude. Maybe you didn't mean to come across that way, but the italics and "don't trust other scientists I know better" message was a little harsh and could have been stated in a nicer tone when trying to educate someone who's admitting their ignorance. But thanks for the correction.

    • @lythronax-argestes
      @lythronax-argestes 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Emphasis and a general statement that is usually true, but I can't speak on behalf of my audience.

  • @dracodracarys2339
    @dracodracarys2339 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    dinosaurs among us? idk man sounds kinda
    SUS

  • @gorrillawarfair
    @gorrillawarfair 9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I've always thought dinosaurs had feathers. Not all of them but some of the depictions of them always looked like they would look better with feathers. And it always bugged me as a kid that they knew what color dinosaurs were until i learned they were pretty much guessing

    • @MB32904
      @MB32904 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      yeah, looking at a velociraptor without feathers, I just feel like it's naked, velociraptor doesn't strike me as scaly
      t rex does strike me as scaly though

  • @miguelsalgado918
    @miguelsalgado918 5 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Those clever girls should've been covered in feathers...

  • @pixx3461
    @pixx3461 5 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    The way he says archaeopteryx hurts me...Great video regardless!

    • @jonhohensee3258
      @jonhohensee3258 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I know! It's like fingernails on a chalkboard.

  • @jupiterkelthuzad7289
    @jupiterkelthuzad7289 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Just a note: The makers of Jurrasic Park did not know that some Therepods had feathers when the first movie(s) came out, so in the newer ones they wanted to keep the style. They found their mistake, but they wanted to keep the style so it didn't seem weird =U

  • @boglenight1551
    @boglenight1551 8 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    So, raptors were raptors? #MindBlown #PenisInWait

    • @coolfrog8777
      @coolfrog8777 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Boglenight “pen is in wait”, please say it was that....

    • @PU8698
      @PU8698 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      May-Fly The Protogen if he would have meant that he would have typed is like this(Is) and not like this (is)

  • @UnisRapper
    @UnisRapper ปีที่แล้ว +5

    A- AMONG US!!!

  • @paulnjeru2005
    @paulnjeru2005 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    That cold open was one of the funniest I've ever seen

  • @thefluffyaj4119
    @thefluffyaj4119 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    god I love studying birds and dinosaurs. did you know that birds could be considered reptiles? biologists use two classification systems, linnaean and phylogenetic. under the linnaean system, which classified things based off features, birds aren't reptiles. but under the phylogenetic system, which classifies things based off ancestry, birds are indeed reptiles. in fact birds closest living relatives are actually crocodiles. each of these systems have good uses and are used frequently. so, not only are birds living breathing dinosaurs, they could also be considered reptiles. a sparrows or bluejays closest non bird relative is a crocodile and I think that's so wild

    • @archive2500
      @archive2500 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Phylogenetic is still the best because you can map the Linnaean classification in the phylogenetic but you can not map the phylogenetic in the Linnaean classification.
      Phylogenetic is also objective, conclusive, and consistent.

  • @lunchpunchcrab32
    @lunchpunchcrab32 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Chickens get hypnotized and freeze from seeing a line drawn on the ground, and a dinosaur is a chicken.
    So...
    Easiest way to survive a dinosaur encounter?
    Draw a line on the ground and that "big chicken" will freeze.

    • @claytonodonkazakhstans1335
      @claytonodonkazakhstans1335 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Bassicly survival tactics in mesozoic

    • @vincenzocapasso9990
      @vincenzocapasso9990 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Very unlikely but it wouldn't matter...a 5+ tons predator wouldn't waste time and stamina for trying to hunt a small and not enough nutritional animal. So if you wouldn't invade their territory (in case they were territorial) they shouldn't mind you.

    • @jonhohensee3258
      @jonhohensee3258 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lunch - He never said that dinosaurs are chickens.

    • @MB32904
      @MB32904 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      dinosaurs aren't chickens, chickens are dinosaurs

  • @eeefroge9825
    @eeefroge9825 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    4:00 when the dinosaur fell there was a fire work outside my house. And it was perfect timing

  • @graceignacio306
    @graceignacio306 7 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    "I'm so glad birds don't have teeth any more"
    Then came to my mind a duck 😢

  • @bentoth9555
    @bentoth9555 8 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I think the reason the JP movies go without the plumage is that the first conclusively feathered fossils were found after the first movie, and by then they had already gone without feathers in the movies and wanted to keep a coherent aesthetic.

  • @jocelynflorez8908
    @jocelynflorez8908 6 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    6 minutes just to say “No. birds are theropods, a type of dinosaur.”

    • @ethan.saraiva
      @ethan.saraiva 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Theropod is just a classification of dinosaurs based on their bone structure. Technically there are still theropods although majority of birds have 4 toes aposed to 3 toes. A better term would be *avian* dinosaurs which is modern day birds following the evolutionary traits of the archaeopteryx.

    • @jeromiousbingletonthe3st195
      @jeromiousbingletonthe3st195 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ethan Saraiva big brain

    • @Goldsthar
      @Goldsthar 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Birds are birds, a type of dinsaur. Fixed it.

    • @DINO_X65
      @DINO_X65 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ethan.saraiva actually archaeopteryx was related, but not really an ancestor of the bird lineage, kind of like gorgonopsids were mammal like but branched off before mammals

    • @neildegrassetysonwithaknife
      @neildegrassetysonwithaknife 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ethan.saraiva they are still theropds, but they have derived characteristics. It's the same way we're mammals, but rather than having fur like are the ancestral characteristics of mammals, we have hair. It was just modified a bit, however, we are still mammals.

  • @spavliskojr
    @spavliskojr 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This makes perfect sense. anyone who spends time around birds can really see it. Anyone see a shoehorn bill? those things look like living dinos. Also nightmare fuel to look at them.

    • @nirmalaannadurai3140
      @nirmalaannadurai3140 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Have seen a aseel they are the cool looking chickens

  • @xxdavid_gaming687
    @xxdavid_gaming687 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Amogus

    • @MB32904
      @MB32904 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      suskityrannus

  • @MsAerosensa
    @MsAerosensa 9 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This might have been one of your most well-done episodes yet. Creativity and editing was just superb.

  • @walterr.2619
    @walterr.2619 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    You guys are doing an amazing job with the videos. They are entertaining and appealing for people of all ages.

  • @alexanderveritas
    @alexanderveritas ปีที่แล้ว +2

    These modern dinosaurs are very _sus,_ let me tell you that much.

  • @CLONisKING
    @CLONisKING 8 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    the roar of the bird was sooo incredible awsome

    • @admiralcat3809
      @admiralcat3809 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Dinosaurs never roar

    • @dundee6402
      @dundee6402 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Clon King Fun fact: that roar was made from an elephant sound for The movie JP

    • @kittehcatty5713
      @kittehcatty5713 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      *in its head* I am birb. HEAR ME ROARRRR!!! *cockadoodledoo* whoops....

  • @star.of.all.time7
    @star.of.all.time7 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    As a bird lover, it’s time to show this video to everyone who thought birds are not dinosaurs.

    • @jonhohensee3258
      @jonhohensee3258 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Who cares that you're a bird lover?

    • @archive2500
      @archive2500 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@jonhohensee3258 Rude.

    • @jonhohensee3258
      @jonhohensee3258 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@archive2500 - Oh my goodness. 😑

  • @LuigiG145
    @LuigiG145 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    It's unwise to use the term "Mammals" in context of tetrapod evolution as Mammaliaformes is only a crown group. The animals you're thinking of when you said "Mammals" are basal synapsids. All mammals are synapsids, but not all synapsids are mammals. _Dimetrodon_, Gorgonopsians, _Dicynodon_, _Edaphosaurus_, _Cynognathus_, and kin are all basal synapsids. Yeah, they're the ancestors of mammals but that doesn't make them mammals proper. Mammal refers to any synapsid within the crown group Mammaliaformes so any synapsids outside of this group are not mammals and are usually just called Stem-mammals, Mammal-grade synapsids, mammal-line pelycosaurs, etc.
    Just make sure the synapsid is actually within Mammaliaformes before you call it a Mammal.

  • @kyleferreira3742
    @kyleferreira3742 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    In defense of Jurassic Park, the original was released in 1993 and it wasn't until 2008 that paleontologists noticed quill knobs on a velociraptor's forearm fossil, thus proving they had feathers. Granted, Archaeopteryx was discovered in 1861, but paleontologists have been slow to accept changing perceptions about dinosaurs (for example, many theropods having feathers, more bird-like than reptile-like, semi-warm blooded). It's good to be skeptical to major changes in science, but all I'm saying is that that impacted in filmmakers' decisions in Jurassic Park.

  • @lilacskies9493
    @lilacskies9493 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The parasaurolophus is my favorite dino… it’s just so neat looking with the crest on its head😀

  • @shinian6523
    @shinian6523 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I pointed to a robin outside the window and told my 7 year old niece "Look! There's dinosaur". lol

  • @HyperionaSilverleaf
    @HyperionaSilverleaf 5 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    Dinosaurs are birds. Birds are dinosaurs that made it.

    • @toadvlogs2213
      @toadvlogs2213 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You have it mixed up on the first part

    • @MB32904
      @MB32904 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      dinosaurs are not birds. birds are a type of theropod & a triceratops or ankylosaurus isn't a theropod.

  • @kvarnerinfoTV
    @kvarnerinfoTV 8 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    To be clear calling Dinosaurs reptiles is not correct in fact or it is correct as much as calling us reptiles. Calling Archaeopteryx ancestors scaly reptiles is also incorrect.
    Except that ok video. Thumb up!

    • @ANIMALBEHAVIORoff
      @ANIMALBEHAVIORoff 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nope, dinosaurs ARE reptiles, we are not. Mammals are synapsids, which are a different group of vertebrates analogous to sauropsida (reptiles). Our first ancestors did look a lot like reptiles, becouse they had not evolved the more mammal like features due to their early evolution, but just becouse something looks like another thing doesn't mean that it is that thing.
      Dinosaurs, including birds, are on the other hand reptiles, there's no doubt about that. Reptiles (sauropsida) are a huge clade of animals.

    • @kvarnerinfoTV
      @kvarnerinfoTV 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ANIMALBEHAVIOR
      Well mammals are also reptiles to be honest.

    • @ANIMALBEHAVIORoff
      @ANIMALBEHAVIORoff 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Linus Magnus no, we aren't, we are synapsids.

    • @kvarnerinfoTV
      @kvarnerinfoTV 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      ANIMALBEHAVIOR and synapsids are reptiles by that definition.
      Both mammals and dinosaurs are reptiles with your logic. Btw. you are lagging in time/knowledge.
      www.iflscience.com/plants-and-animals/there-s-no-such-thing-reptiles-any-more-and-here-s-why/

    • @ANIMALBEHAVIORoff
      @ANIMALBEHAVIORoff 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Linus Magnus synapsides are NOT reptiles. In the Early Carboniferous amniotes split into two lineages the synapsids and the reptiles or sauropsids (anapsids & diapsids). Synapsids did not evolve from reptiles, but both groups share a common ancestry with basal amniotes.
      Reptiles today refer to to Sausopsids, which in include the clade of dinosaurs that birds are part of, therefor making them true reptiles.
      We aren't reptile, we don't come from reptiles and we've never been reptiles.
      Here you can see the actual tree of life that shows how synapsida and sauropsida separated from each other millions of years ago: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amniote#Cladogram

  • @MundoJagaimo
    @MundoJagaimo 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    SUS AMONG US SUS

    • @doubleoof7907
      @doubleoof7907 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      god damn it

  • @louf7178
    @louf7178 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Sorry, I can't agree "birds are dinosaurs"; a wolf isn't a dog either, although they are canine.

    • @foxyscorpio8888
      @foxyscorpio8888 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Not all mammals are dogs, but all dogs are mammals. Not all dinosaurs are birds, but all birds are dinosaurs.

    • @louf7178
      @louf7178 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@foxyscorpio8888 All birds are archosaurs seems a more correct analogy.
      Even though gasses and liquids are both fluids flying is applicable to air, and swimming is applicable to liquids. Gotta know where to draw the proverbial line.

    • @foxyscorpio8888
      @foxyscorpio8888 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Ornithologists and Paleontologists overwhelming agree birds should be classified as dinos. Is Trex a Dino? Is Triceratops? Of course. Trex is more closely related to birds than it was to triceratops. Case closed.

  • @HugoYogurt
    @HugoYogurt 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    technically Speaking They Aren't Since Birds Are Therapod Dinosaurs

  • @Derpingmuffin
    @Derpingmuffin 6 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    "not as scary but scientifically speaking, it makes sense"
    -talking about giant chicken
    *square cube law tho*

    • @Derpingmuffin
      @Derpingmuffin 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @A Thing Brilliant, I've been waiting two whole years.. but now I know that my opinion is finally valid. Thankyou my friend, I owe you one

    • @Derpingmuffin
      @Derpingmuffin 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @A Thing thanks man

    • @MB32904
      @MB32904 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      4d beings have to deal with square-cube-tesseract law

  • @onehappypepper8732
    @onehappypepper8732 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Oml that intro was really really well made

  • @manilastreetsweeper5890
    @manilastreetsweeper5890 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    If I hunt birds, then I'm a dinosaur hunter.
    If I farm chickens, then I'm a dinosaur *FARMER!!!!!*

  • @alwanrosyidi3753
    @alwanrosyidi3753 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    If only non avian dinosaur still exist, i'm sure we'll hunt them and roast them, making a 'roasted trex mukbang'.
    We're the top predator.

  • @craigscraig5217
    @craigscraig5217 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    In jurassic park they didnt use feathers cause the dinosaurs werent perfect they where clones not natural dinos is my theory

    • @dimetrodon2250
      @dimetrodon2250 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Feathered dinosaurs weren't really accepted until the early-mid 2000's, so Jurassic Park was actually pretty accurate for its time. Jurassic World attempts to explain these "inaccuracies" when Dr. Wu explains that many of the animals don't actually resemble the real thing, and InGen was more interested in attracting visitors than being scientifically accurate (also the whole weaponized raptor subplot wouldn't have worked with 'real' velociraptors).

    • @Mr.Killjoy95
      @Mr.Killjoy95 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah, you're right about the reason the dinosaurs were featherless. It was the amphibian DNA that did it. During the lab tour scene where the baby raptor is born Dr Satler questions how Henry Wu knows what specific dinosaur it is and he responds with "we don't know until they hatch". Basically, the movie explains to the viewer that the scientists don't even know what dinosaurs are actually being born and what they will look like. That scene is also the key to understanding that the raptors aren't even Velociraptors. Stephen Spielburgh and Michael Chriton knew that they weren't, that was the point. The entire book and movie is basically a case why we shouldn't mess with genetics because even when we think we have control, we really have none.