What is Impossible in Evolution?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 12 พ.ค. 2024
  • PBS Member Stations rely on viewers like you. To support your local station, go to: to.pbs.org/DonateOKAY
    ↓ More info and sources below ↓
    We’re on PATREON! Join the community ►► / itsokaytobesmart
    SUBSCRIBE so you don’t miss a video! ►► bit.ly/iotbs_sub
    Could humans ever evolve to have wings? Why don’t fish have propellers? Why don’t tigers have wheels? Why don’t zebras have laser turrets? These might all seem like stupid questions (and maybe they are!) but they can teach us a lot about how evolution actually works, and how it doesn’t work.
    References: sites.google.com/view/whatisi...
    -----------
    Big Thank you to our Brain Trust Patrons:
    Roy Lasris
    Javier Soto
    dani bowman
    David Johnston
    Ahmed Elkhanany
    Zenimal
    Salih Arslan
    Baerbel Winkler
    Robert Young
    Amy Sowada
    Benjamin Teinby
    Eric Meer
    Jay Stephens
    Peter Ehrnstrom
    Dustin
    Marcus Tuepker
    Karen Haskell
    AlecZero
    Diego Lombeida
    Join us on Patreon!
    / itsokaytobesmart
    Twitter
    / drjoehanson
    / okaytobesmart
    Instagram
    / drjoehanson
    / okaytobesmart
    Merch
    store.dftba.com/collections/i...
    Facebook
    / itsokaytobesmartpbs

ความคิดเห็น • 10K

  • @besmart
    @besmart  3 ปีที่แล้ว +3806

    We’re aware some people are seeing glitches and artifacts on the video. We’ve reviewed and it’s not in the master video file! Seems to be a problem on TH-cam’s end with how they encode the videos (we aren’t the only channel affected), and we hope it’s fixed soon.

    • @RudeAlert
      @RudeAlert 3 ปีที่แล้ว +89

      THANK YOU for mentioning this! I was starting to freak out, wondering if it was my computer about to croak. Well, at least it's not just your channel, and this was a great video anyways, so who care about a few weird visual glitches. Keep up the good work.

    • @brokeandtired
      @brokeandtired 3 ปีที่แล้ว +48

      But evolution can evolve laser Zebras... It evolves humans who then can put lasers on Zebras.

    • @mixtlillness9825
      @mixtlillness9825 3 ปีที่แล้ว +36

      I see. So it’s not the drugs then.

    • @mixei4
      @mixei4 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      I've already started looking for a hidden message there.

    • @Goryus
      @Goryus 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      5-legged cats have actually been observed...maybe worth a correction.

  • @Happy-yf8bc
    @Happy-yf8bc 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12143

    “Why is there no giraffe-sized chickens”
    Because they got wiped out by a space rock

    • @Eldritch-1
      @Eldritch-1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +738

      became KFC in the modern age.

    • @hydrolito
      @hydrolito 3 ปีที่แล้ว +221

      Some guy might think it is possible to clone them and figure out a way to do it that was plot of movie Death Birds.

    • @motazfawzi2504
      @motazfawzi2504 3 ปีที่แล้ว +112

      They are exclusive for the Skyrim DLC of the Universe.

    • @ygotsvlog3762
      @ygotsvlog3762 3 ปีที่แล้ว +36

      @@Eldritch-1 they got cooked

    • @antz4thehour601
      @antz4thehour601 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      True

  • @vekkimheng8766
    @vekkimheng8766 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3810

    People : where's the laser zebras?!
    Evolution : crabs, take it or leave it.

    • @zeppelincraft1443
      @zeppelincraft1443 2 ปีที่แล้ว +134

      While crabs: We have microscopic vision that defines more than enough colors and we can make plasma out of our claws.

    • @kadmuspl830
      @kadmuspl830 2 ปีที่แล้ว +31

      insert "silence brand" meme

    • @anotherrandomguy8871
      @anotherrandomguy8871 2 ปีที่แล้ว +87

      Pistol shrimp who can fire heat bubbles out of their huge claw like a cannon: sup

    • @newmeta2668
      @newmeta2668 2 ปีที่แล้ว +58

      @@anotherrandomguy8871 meanwhile mantis shrimp who can also create heat bubbles on impact with their club like arms: sup

    • @caseyhansen4467
      @caseyhansen4467 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Lmao I love that I understood the reference 😂

  • @MartijnMuller
    @MartijnMuller 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +334

    Some hairless ape: why don't we have giraffe-sized chickens?
    Dinosaurs: am I a joke to you?

    • @ishowslow5044
      @ishowslow5044 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      Elephant birds: Yes.

  • @breadloafbrad
    @breadloafbrad ปีที่แล้ว +635

    The hills and valleys representation of evolution is actually an incredible way of visualizing it

    • @vast634
      @vast634 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      The same concept lies behind training artificial neural nets. Its an optimization problem, searching in the space of opportunities.

    • @clapdrix72
      @clapdrix72 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      It's a useful framework for solving a lot of problems. Machine learning for one.

    • @Dad-rk8pi
      @Dad-rk8pi 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      ​@@vast634Exactly, i was visualising gradient descent when he was talking about evolution

    • @steelbear2063
      @steelbear2063 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Though there's something to be said about moving downwards. No it's not really downwards, but simplification is a thing also, where organisms lose some traits

    • @JakeEast68
      @JakeEast68 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      ​@@steelbear2063I was just thinking about the fact that if a species lost the need for something, they could "travel back down the hill" and possibly go up a new one

  • @AhmedAffraz
    @AhmedAffraz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9304

    "If humans could fly, we'd consider it exercise and never do it" - Ron Swanson

    • @jayav2877
      @jayav2877 3 ปีที่แล้ว +413

      I didn't know someone had said this before and honestly had a conversation about this last year.

    • @faustin289
      @faustin289 3 ปีที่แล้ว +613

      ... unless you could mate mid-flight.

    • @Unknown-tv3bi
      @Unknown-tv3bi 3 ปีที่แล้ว +343

      @@faustin289 That would take a lot of mating.

    • @sam_9228
      @sam_9228 3 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      I miss Parks and Rec lol

    • @InfinityOrNone
      @InfinityOrNone 3 ปีที่แล้ว +444

      @@faustin289 Flying is complicated enough as is, I doubt anyone would be able to pull it off mid-coitus. Take the Bald Eagle's mid-air mating; they don't do it while flying, they do it while _falling._

  • @so-ares
    @so-ares 3 ปีที่แล้ว +22509

    "Nature is infinitely creative" - Keep creating crabs...

    • @KoneSkirata
      @KoneSkirata 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1207

      I understood that reference!

    • @thewildcardperson
      @thewildcardperson 3 ปีที่แล้ว +177

      Nice

    • @gardenhead92
      @gardenhead92 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1437

      You can’t argue with perfection

    • @kiryu4708
      @kiryu4708 3 ปีที่แล้ว +392

      Ya I got crabs

    • @kiryu4708
      @kiryu4708 3 ปีที่แล้ว +304

      Oh wait not that kind... nvm

  • @csabalako1788
    @csabalako1788 ปีที่แล้ว +362

    Excuses, excuses... I want my zebras with laser turrets!

    • @blendersparticlesystem5220
      @blendersparticlesystem5220 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Everybody does

    • @crazydinosaur8945
      @crazydinosaur8945 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@blendersparticlesystem5220 think Lions dont

    • @GabiN64
      @GabiN64 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      ​@@crazydinosaur8945 they should evolve deflector shields then

    • @jellyfishno.22
      @jellyfishno.22 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Forget zebras, why don't I have laser turrets!?

    • @doktormcnasty
      @doktormcnasty 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@jellyfishno.22 Zebras need them more than you do because of all the lions, crocodiles, wild dogs, & hyenas they have to content with.

  • @gilgonzalez8985
    @gilgonzalez8985 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +108

    “You don’t just get something because it’s cool”
    My financial decisions beg to differ.

    • @RanEdgar-ok3wk
      @RanEdgar-ok3wk 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

      🫵😨 no stop how dare save your money good sir/mis/they
      Don’t do itttttt😭😭

  • @joshuasims5421
    @joshuasims5421 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6414

    Giraffe size chicken isn’t remotely impossible, that’s a T-rex

    • @toastiesburned9929
      @toastiesburned9929 3 ปีที่แล้ว +287

      Yeah, but they would have to switch back on a lot of genes that might have mutated away. Re-evolving giantism would probably be pretty hard for a domesticated species. At least without a special breeding program... 🤔

    • @spacesharkwriter6554
      @spacesharkwriter6554 3 ปีที่แล้ว +159

      Yes, the tyrannosaurus genus died a long time ago, trex was one of the last tyrannosaurs, t-rex was already on the decline, it was evolving into a bird, it was growing feathers and turning into a chicken, the atmosphere and the climate, it was more efficient to be a small bird, think about that the next time you eat chicken wings, 11 year old dinosaur genus out ✌🏻

    • @rogeriopenna9014
      @rogeriopenna9014 3 ปีที่แล้ว +90

      @@Clifford_Banes Dino bones were just like bird bones.
      And no, duck bones are stronger than the more solid mammal bones with the same cross section.
      That's exactly the reason why dinosaurs could grow to larger sizes than mammals. With the same cross section, a dino bone is stronger and thus can support more mass than a mammal bone

    • @saturnianrings3920
      @saturnianrings3920 3 ปีที่แล้ว +77

      It’s CRISPR time.

    • @SirSpiro
      @SirSpiro 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      LMAO

  • @matheuroux5134
    @matheuroux5134 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3086

    If we all start actively pretending that large arms are super attractive, and seek mates with massive arms, that would be the first step towards a wing evolution.

    • @spiderpickle3255
      @spiderpickle3255 3 ปีที่แล้ว +427

      Human hands > wings
      Our hands are one of those extremely high evolutionary peaks, arguably a higher one than wings. Look into how our fingernails absolutely blow away claws and then consider what our dexterity has enabled us to build as a species.

    • @bsu5574
      @bsu5574 3 ปีที่แล้ว +501

      @@spiderpickle3255 b..but...wings.... :((

    • @asiantom4935
      @asiantom4935 3 ปีที่แล้ว +255

      @@spiderpickle3255 ok but wings

    • @monad_tcp
      @monad_tcp 3 ปีที่แล้ว +44

      nah, the only thing we all know it will happen is that humans will get higher and higher

    • @chargemankent
      @chargemankent 3 ปีที่แล้ว +75

      @@monad_tcp Welp... I think that's enough weed today~

  • @weston407
    @weston407 ปีที่แล้ว +64

    I had the EXACT same experience with Return to Oz and the wheelers when I was a kid - the wheeler looking through the keyhole absolutely terrified me

  • @Mightydoggo
    @Mightydoggo 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    I remember my grandparents having a Trabant. It was loud, stinky, had a tendency to fall apart and if you hit a cobblestone road, it would severely hamper your reproduction capabilities for a few days. Still the flexibility compared to the horse cart we often took to the market at weekends was superb. You also had no heater, so we used to put one of those propane gas canisters on the backseat with a heating unit on it. Oh and the doors stopped working towards the end, so we had to enter/leave through the window. Yeah... "Good" old times, eh?
    Nowadays even on the countryside every family has at least 2 cars, often more and you even see stuff like Teslas from time to time. Among a lot of tractors and the occasional horse/dog cart.

  • @shallowseller3893
    @shallowseller3893 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1576

    5 millions years later
    Laser Zebra: Well guess what.

  • @saims.2402
    @saims.2402 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2682

    When I first learned about evolution, it was from Pokémon, I was 4 and I sat in a corner trying to evolve.
    Edit: I only believed evolution works like in Pokémon until I was 8 or 9.

    • @eternalblue4660
      @eternalblue4660 3 ปีที่แล้ว +253

      Well, did it work?

    • @saims.2402
      @saims.2402 3 ปีที่แล้ว +578

      @@eternalblue4660 I evolved into a bored teenager.

    • @amalirfan
      @amalirfan 3 ปีที่แล้ว +124

      @@saims.2402 now where you at, did you get to adulthood :D

    • @saims.2402
      @saims.2402 3 ปีที่แล้ว +273

      @@amalirfan now I’m evolved into a TH-cam commenting teenager

    • @rogeriopenna9014
      @rogeriopenna9014 3 ปีที่แล้ว +102

      Pokemon style evolution is EXACTLY how creationists think Evolution works, and use as a strawman to discredit it. "Why don´t we see apes turning into humans... like right now?". "Why no ducks turning into crocodiles?"

  • @marrrtin
    @marrrtin 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    Worth mentioning that nature makes wheels, or at least rotors at the molecular scale, such as a flagellum, like a propellor for a protist, or the famous "waterwheel driven by protons", ATP Synthase.

    • @hoi-polloi1863
      @hoi-polloi1863 19 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Right, on the macro scale wheels get really hard because you have to be able to feed the "spinny bits" without having them attached to the circulatory system. At tiny scales all kinds of great stuff becomes practical!

  • @onimaruvt
    @onimaruvt 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    the landscape graph was such a good visual representation

  • @bubblebeamm
    @bubblebeamm 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1556

    I dont even want wings man i just want the lumbar spine to be able to support us

    • @azhero09
      @azhero09 3 ปีที่แล้ว +144

      A truly underappreciated comment

    • @blazingtrs6348
      @blazingtrs6348 3 ปีที่แล้ว +147

      for that the people with back pain shouldn’t propagate

    • @azhero09
      @azhero09 3 ปีที่แล้ว +44

      @@blazingtrs6348 let's do it for science then

    • @zombkillrb
      @zombkillrb 3 ปีที่แล้ว +75

      I'm telling y'all cybernetics is where it's at, I heard developers talk about how the only people who would use it would be those who need it like amputees but I'm not convinced that if it were really effecient that it wouldn't become used recreationally and complimentary like to eliminate the effects of carpal tunnel syndrome or others like it

    • @whatwhale5888
      @whatwhale5888 3 ปีที่แล้ว +35

      @@zombkillrb oh for sure, I dont dount people will be recreationally augmenting themselves for medical reasons but also for fun. Personally im looking forward to eye implants. Like imagine being able to take pics or zoom or have night vision with your eyes

  • @miketacos9034
    @miketacos9034 3 ปีที่แล้ว +593

    Birds: "If only we had hands instead of these useless wings, so we could build laser cannons."

    • @Galaxia7
      @Galaxia7 3 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      Said 50 % of New Zealand birds

    • @rowandunning6877
      @rowandunning6877 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      yeah, a lot of birds are fuckin' smart

    • @God-ch8lq
      @God-ch8lq 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Haha crows go brrrr

    • @ExtantFrodo2
      @ExtantFrodo2 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Building prosthetics for animals so they can be tool users... hmm.

    • @tres-2b299
      @tres-2b299 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Birds: i wish we had hands
      Humans: i wish we had wings

  • @KuyoCuteeTv
    @KuyoCuteeTv 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    im a simple guy, i see zebra with laser, i click.
    this means there is a possibility of mermaids existing

  • @antigrav6004
    @antigrav6004 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    'when you're the best, why try harder?' - crabs

  • @juksleo6257
    @juksleo6257 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1325

    **Looks at the thumbnail**
    **looks at my pet Zebra**
    Me: "it's ok Gerald, don't listen to him, your lasers will grow in a few years"

    • @Lucian_Andries
      @Lucian_Andries 3 ปีที่แล้ว +39

      We love you just the way you are..... :)))))))))))))

    • @Artist_of_Imagination
      @Artist_of_Imagination 3 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      Wait you have a pet zebra?!!

    • @NurseSnow2U
      @NurseSnow2U 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      🤣🤣🤣, it’s gonna be just fine Gerald.

    • @andrinjohn3449
      @andrinjohn3449 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@Artist_of_Imagination toys may be 😂

    • @ronjayrose9706
      @ronjayrose9706 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Stop lying to that poor zebra

  • @maxwoo9695
    @maxwoo9695 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1984

    "thats why its impossible"
    200000 years later,
    Zebras: whanna bet

    • @electronx5594
      @electronx5594 2 ปีที่แล้ว +45

      i doubt if its gonna still be a zebra

    • @rishikesh4117
      @rishikesh4117 2 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      Possible but not inside 200k years
      Dont give that nuub in the first reply likes

    • @maxwoo9695
      @maxwoo9695 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @ً ruh roh reggy

    • @ph1l69
      @ph1l69 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Sans

    • @maxwoo9695
      @maxwoo9695 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ph1l69 ye

  • @Mikado8
    @Mikado8 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    It’s been a really long time since the last time i learned that many new things with so many really great explanations

  • @TheSniff517
    @TheSniff517 21 วันที่ผ่านมา +17

    "We're still not gonna grow wings though."
    Me: Drinks Redbull

  • @ewanbiesinger7667
    @ewanbiesinger7667 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2623

    A lovely way to sum this up would be to state that “evolution is lazy”. Evolution will solve a problem in the easiest way possible. And will never go out of its way to make a species superior.

    • @anunknownperson4018
      @anunknownperson4018 2 ปีที่แล้ว +90

      it will take years for species evolution to change, look at radiation it last till probably more than 24 yrs, maybe in the future humans or animals will resist radiation?

    • @ewanbiesinger7667
      @ewanbiesinger7667 2 ปีที่แล้ว +153

      @@anunknownperson4018 surely resistance to radiation is one of the things that is actively being worked on by evolution right now… However as you correctly stated, this will take years.

    • @patricknogueiraa
      @patricknogueiraa 2 ปีที่แล้ว +193

      Exactly, evolution has nothing to do with being superior, it is about being fit for your environment at the lowest cost. That's why not all animals end up big, predators or having high intelligence

    • @kilroy987
      @kilroy987 2 ปีที่แล้ว +37

      Evolution: Make owl ears asymmeterical so they can use sound to see, let this snail shed its body and grow a new one from just its head, make this walking stick look just like a leaf, and this beetle shoots hot chemicals from its butt.

    • @MultiMolly21
      @MultiMolly21 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Oh yes it will. Right now, we are Nature's darlings because we're going to save the planet, once we get our ducks in a row that is. We needed the infinitely powerful Atomic Bomb, and for that She was willing to sacrifice trillions of us, but now that we have that, and the capacity to spot a meteor on its way to smash us, we can get civilized again and clean things up a bit. Remember, we're not done evolving; we're a work in progress. But we're also the Saints here, and all of Life on Earth is counting on us.

  • @Eralen00
    @Eralen00 3 ปีที่แล้ว +217

    Europeans: "You don't use wheels? You know, those round thingies that spin on axles?"
    Mesoamericans: "Oh we put those on our toys for children"

    • @chandrasekarannatarajan3542
      @chandrasekarannatarajan3542 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Then they sacrifice them

    • @RhodianColossus
      @RhodianColossus 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      @@chandrasekarannatarajan3542 there were people other than aztecs in the americas you know

    • @thememoryhole9355
      @thememoryhole9355 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'll bet the toys were copied from other cultures from wheeled societies, perhaps the Chinese.

    • @Sorrowdusk
      @Sorrowdusk 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@thememoryhole9355 they'd have to MEET the Chinese first

    • @thememoryhole9355
      @thememoryhole9355 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Sorrowdusk Yes. I'm suggesting the Chinese may have made it to the Americas, among others.

  • @oddinvestigator
    @oddinvestigator 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Best way I've seen someone explaining square cube law. The volume increases at a higuer rate in comparison to area. It's possible to create a relation between the increments, but impossible directly between volume and area, as the area/volume ratio doesn't exist since the units differ.

  • @dasstigma
    @dasstigma 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    5:36
    I need this as a poster!

  • @ariedevs
    @ariedevs 3 ปีที่แล้ว +910

    Meanwhile in another multiverse zebrazooka just started their world war 9.

    • @thoticcusprime9309
      @thoticcusprime9309 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      nope

    • @chiefmaster2128
      @chiefmaster2128 2 ปีที่แล้ว +45

      Kamikaze butterfly's don't stand a chance

    • @MaskFaceStup1dP4nc4kes
      @MaskFaceStup1dP4nc4kes 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      it's funny to imagine these stuff happening in other realities.

    • @mega-_-1984
      @mega-_-1984 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      @@chiefmaster2128 nah they'll team up with lemon starfish and destroy zebrazookas

    • @OTDinosaurScrubs
      @OTDinosaurScrubs 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@mega-_-1984 but the rocket rhinos stay on top

  • @andyt1313
    @andyt1313 3 ปีที่แล้ว +606

    I read this somewhere. Evolution isn’t about the “best” or even the “good”, it’s about the “good enough”

    • @altrag
      @altrag 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      Sort of but not really. If say, zebras evolved lasers to fight off all their predators they would definitely be "good enough", but there would still be competition for mates and food and the like so the entire species as a whole would continue to get "better" even though all of the pressures are all internal. It would be a much, much slower evolution than would be produced by external pressures, but it would still happen.

    • @nate7LP_my_dog_found_the_knife
      @nate7LP_my_dog_found_the_knife 3 ปีที่แล้ว +37

      @@altrag maybe lions would evolve laser beams or ways to deflect the laser.

    • @menacetosociety9076
      @menacetosociety9076 3 ปีที่แล้ว +57

      @@nate7LP_my_dog_found_the_knife mirror lions 😳

    • @vedantjain5853
      @vedantjain5853 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      You probably heard it on TH-cam as I did too recently but can’t remember from which video

    • @matheussanthiago9685
      @matheussanthiago9685 3 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      evolution is the greatest C - student

  • @livingcorpse5664
    @livingcorpse5664 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    No energy weapon evolution like lasers.
    Electric Eels: Am I joke to you?

    • @Tophat-Turtle
      @Tophat-Turtle 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      That's electricity my guy, that's quite normal in the animal kingdom

    • @livingcorpse5664
      @livingcorpse5664 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@Tophat-Turtle Woosh.

  • @granolakitti8521
    @granolakitti8521 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    With the same logic that rattet snakes "rattle parts" work, animals should be able to grow wheels. And if muscles, or other movable tissue, os correctly positioned inside they would be able to roll

    • @adissentingopinion848
      @adissentingopinion848 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Yeah, but the snake could get more effective with but a single grain of substance rattling in their tail. At least it wouldn't hurt, and it is ultimately not vital to survival. If you're gonna roll with wheels they have to be complete and be repairable from damage. The bones in our legs can mend themselves because they're surrounded with static flesh and tons of blood.

    • @Ant3rn
      @Ant3rn ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@adissentingopinion848evolution is ok with non-repairable parts. What’s about teeth or limbs? A lion without teeth is pretty dead in wild. I would say wheels are not effective enough without roads ( durability, flexibility, speed ) to compete with good old legs.

    • @SwordFastic
      @SwordFastic ปีที่แล้ว +1

      how will they move the wheels?

    • @Ant3rn
      @Ant3rn ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@SwordFastic any way. Pushing, like on wheelchair, more close to a steam train. It’s no more complicated than our eye or brain.

    • @LineOfThy
      @LineOfThy ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@SwordFastic pushing with other limbs

  • @Loth_kat
    @Loth_kat 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1694

    Einstein: "You can't teach a fish to climb a tree."
    Mudskipper: *climbs tree
    Einstein: ....

    • @odeofdespair
      @odeofdespair 2 ปีที่แล้ว +179

      Funny, but you got the quote wrong. Its "If you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree it will live its whole life thinking its stupid." or something to that affect.

    • @Loth_kat
      @Loth_kat 2 ปีที่แล้ว +95

      @@odeofdespair ye but however stupid the fish thought it was, it finally climbed a tree

    • @sayakchoudhury9711
      @sayakchoudhury9711 2 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      There's a fish literally called Climbing Perch

    • @Loth_kat
      @Loth_kat 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ludnixvonbithoven2644 xD not exactly how he said it. It's just for jokes

    • @ligth3977
      @ligth3977 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      There are people with disabilities that did the almost impossible.

  • @lluma8153
    @lluma8153 3 ปีที่แล้ว +793

    Looks at thumbnail
    “Hey Ferb, I know what we’re going to do today!”

  • @erivanjunior9368
    @erivanjunior9368 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I actually was about to comment about the mulefas. Glad to see the reference and they actually look even weirder than I had imagined when I read the books.

  • @Somebody_VK
    @Somebody_VK ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Well, I suppose it's time to lock a zebra in a laser room for a couple million years.

  • @Petteri82
    @Petteri82 3 ปีที่แล้ว +960

    Fun fact: Even if you are in bad shape or perhaps overweight, you are automatically one of the best long distance runners on the planet. Unless you aren't human, in which case your reading this is impressive.

    • @somestranger175
      @somestranger175 3 ปีที่แล้ว +77

      I'd disagree. A 350 pound fatball can't walk 50 feet, let alone a mile or so. The human respiratory system is pathetic, it can't support weight. I'm ~185lbs at 5'8 and I can't run at maximum speed for more than 0.5 mile

    • @reubensenft1522
      @reubensenft1522 3 ปีที่แล้ว +257

      @@somestranger175 long distance runner, not long distance sprinter

    • @MannIchFindKeinName
      @MannIchFindKeinName 3 ปีที่แล้ว +46

      @@somestranger175 Sorry, but i disagree based on facts.
      edition.cnn.com/2017/05/05/health/turning-points-mirna-valerio/index.html
      Its just one example, didnt find my original example, but there are plenty of indigenous runners that are fat for western standards, doing more kilometers a day than i move with bus in a whole week (jeah, work is pretty close

    • @georgedunn320
      @georgedunn320 3 ปีที่แล้ว +66

      Good points all. Perhaps the image of a sumotori keeping up with a pronghorn is a bit ludicrous. It might be better to express "long distance runner" as "endurance predator."
      Though most quadripeds would leave humans in the dust in short races, our ancestors excelled in chases lasting several days, our only real challengers being the canids, particularly _lupus_ and _lycaon._
      Upright bipedality means more of the musculature can be devoted to mobility as gravity is resisted by the bones; naked skin provided superior thermoregulation in hot climates; an omnivorous diet meant no need to spend hours browsing or grazing to restore energy and those peculiar primate feet (once well-toughened) could tackle a wide variety of terrain.

    • @reiverdaemon
      @reiverdaemon 3 ปีที่แล้ว +60

      @@somestranger175 Olympic level sprinters can't even maintain top speed in the 100m.
      Humans are about efficiency(endurance) not raw speed or strength.

  • @brian576
    @brian576 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1001

    Very disappointing, they totally missed out on "sharks with frickin laser beams on their heads"

    • @besmart
      @besmart  3 ปีที่แล้ว +556

      Geneva Conventions forbid it

    • @ReprucssionsForever
      @ReprucssionsForever 3 ปีที่แล้ว +81

      @@besmart Mutate the gene in Geneva convention to GENE-VA-riation Convention....and give us the damn psychedelic octopus.......

    • @saturnianrings3920
      @saturnianrings3920 3 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      Get filthy rich. Get a team of Scientist to go wild with CRISPR and your in business.

    • @DneilB007
      @DneilB007 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      @@ReprucssionsForever No, not *that* Geneva Convention. Joe means the 1952 Geneva Copyright Convention. Dr. Evil Jr would demonetize the video.

    • @daisybuchanan8205
      @daisybuchanan8205 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Dr Evil hhhhhhh

  • @jinhuaofficial1608
    @jinhuaofficial1608 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The thumbnail got me lmao now I am here but this was an enjoyable video

  • @Wix_Mitwirth
    @Wix_Mitwirth ปีที่แล้ว +3

    In your examples of odd-numbered limbed animals the extra is the tail. Is a tail a limb? It's part of the spine, the trunk, not a branch off of the trunk. Since it's usually added on beyond the pelvis I suppose it still counts as an appendage. What's the name of that thing on the top of corn stalks?

  • @nobody5093
    @nobody5093 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1137

    when people say they want wings, i don't think anyone is thinking about turning their arms in to wings but having wings come out of their back.

    • @SunniMerlot
      @SunniMerlot 3 ปีที่แล้ว +171

      Exactly. Angel style

    • @notmyopinion4981
      @notmyopinion4981 3 ปีที่แล้ว +174

      i wish we could engineer those, but they apparently have to be huge, to support us and their own weight, cuz they also will be heavy, since we don't have much materials that are light enough and also efficient... so yeah... kinda a bummer

    • @nettewilson853
      @nettewilson853 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Yes

    • @nettewilson853
      @nettewilson853 3 ปีที่แล้ว +44

      @@notmyopinion4981 but we could be smaller and have lighter bones maybe???

    • @rymontgomery7546
      @rymontgomery7546 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Seems even less likely

  • @darkwowplayer
    @darkwowplayer 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3686

    "Why haven't Zebras evolved laser turrets to fend off lions?"
    FINALLY, SOMEONE IS ASKING THE REAL QUESTIONS!

    • @brolydictcumberbatchmontou401
      @brolydictcumberbatchmontou401 ปีที่แล้ว +78

      is an electrical eel not close enough to an equally doable evolutionary trait? I mean tasering crocodiles or lions sneaking up to you in the watering hole seems like a good savannah trait, why don't we see a lot of land animals develop this trait? Because it isn't all that useful on land, and takes a greater amount of food consumption to fuel the organs needed to generate the necessary stores of attack and in the Zebra's case why need it when you have a heard and one the most powerful hind kicks per square inch. A secondary defense system in an a mostly non aquatic life style doesn't evolve because it isn't efficient. Not when you already have useful defense systems.

    • @brolydictcumberbatchmontou401
      @brolydictcumberbatchmontou401 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      And if I also add electric eels have developed this unique defense as an effective offense system as well. So it has double benefits for a predator. Not an herbivore in the long run on land.

    • @terrytheinsane
      @terrytheinsane ปีที่แล้ว +18

      It is because zebras don't need laser turrets, they use their stripes to hypnotize predators

    • @evalynnlindquist8111
      @evalynnlindquist8111 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      I was more concerned about sharks with freakin Lazer beams on their heads

    • @santy214gamer5
      @santy214gamer5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@terrytheinsane I hope you where joking because that is the most incorrect statement I have heard in a long time

  • @5driedgrams
    @5driedgrams 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    4:40
    "please leave"
    lol this is gold

  • @SirNobleIZH
    @SirNobleIZH ปีที่แล้ว +11

    But I WANT MY LASER ZEBRA!!!

  • @matthewtheobald1231
    @matthewtheobald1231 2 ปีที่แล้ว +550

    "Survival of the Fittest" should be renamed to "Survival of the Good Enough"

  • @sagealyxander
    @sagealyxander 3 ปีที่แล้ว +993

    i have a bachelors degree in biology and I was never taught about that "can only go uphill" thing in my four frickin years. thanks IOTBS lol

    • @thomasw4422
      @thomasw4422 3 ปีที่แล้ว +94

      We learnt about that while studying genetic/evolution based optimisation algorithms. If you up the mutation rate to very high levels, you can sorta. But you also risk losing any advantages. It's like the chance of superpowers vs cancer.

    • @Tyronejizz
      @Tyronejizz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Why is someone with a bachelor degree in bilogy watching a kids show?

    • @jacobrutzke691
      @jacobrutzke691 3 ปีที่แล้ว +130

      @@Tyronejizz because its interesting and people like learning new things

    • @Tyronejizz
      @Tyronejizz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@jacobrutzke691 if he has a bachlor in biology he should already know why you can't evolve wings.

    • @jacobrutzke691
      @jacobrutzke691 3 ปีที่แล้ว +78

      @@Tyronejizz so you can always learn new things and some times it's just fun to listen to something in the background

  • @FindTheFun
    @FindTheFun 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Local optima is actually a great way to think about addictions. It's difficult to quit your addictions because you have to go down a lesser peak to find you pathway to a higher one.

  • @kamo7293
    @kamo7293 ปีที่แล้ว

    5:16 this is what I though of when I saw the video title and thumbnail.
    what kind of environment would be necessary for zebras to develop lasers?

  • @danieljensen2626
    @danieljensen2626 3 ปีที่แล้ว +235

    Zebras could use a small glowing red spot to attract mates, then use a low wattage laser to distract lions (think laser pointer and cat), and then eventually power up the laser into a defensive weapon.

    • @kindlin
      @kindlin 3 ปีที่แล้ว +31

      Now I really want to see the biological mechanism of a laser. I can almost imagine it right now. Energy storage and discharge like an electric eel, transparent structures abound, add in some bioluminescence and all it needs is cohesiveness light, which I'm sure evolution could figure out.

    • @michaelprice3031
      @michaelprice3031 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      They'd have to eat a lot though to maintain enough energy to operate it. Perhaps they would develop biological solar panels too?

    • @kindlin
      @kindlin 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @@michaelprice3031
      It could come slowly from your metabolism, or more quickly if light sensitive skin cells started charging up those eel-like batteries.

    • @qwertyasdf9290
      @qwertyasdf9290 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @@michaelprice3031 green zebras with chlorophyll

    • @rhiannanmcdermott6631
      @rhiannanmcdermott6631 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kindlin bn43 ^ 7

  • @abnorman541
    @abnorman541 3 ปีที่แล้ว +211

    I, for one, welcome our new evolutionary superior Laser Zebra overlords.

    • @davegoldspink5354
      @davegoldspink5354 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      😂🤣😂👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻

    • @emmagoff
      @emmagoff 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Better that Boris!

    • @Chimailai
      @Chimailai 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@emmagoff why do you have to get political?

    • @emmagoff
      @emmagoff 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Chimailai it was just a comment made in humour, as was the comment I replied to. Don't let yourself get offended because none was meant 🙏

    • @darthjarjarbinkstherealsit6832
      @darthjarjarbinkstherealsit6832 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes.

  • @lotfi2631
    @lotfi2631 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    My very first look at this channel and i'm welcome with "why tigers don't have wheels and lasers" followed by "it's okay to be smart"
    Grandpa once told that smart people will never say that they're smart , he'll always be right

    • @eddyyt7466
      @eddyyt7466 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Your English is slightly broken and I can’t understand what you mean by this comment

  • @Natu_Visu
    @Natu_Visu 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    8:00
    In certain cases, you *can* move downhill.
    If there are changes to the animal's habitat that make certain features useless, they can begin to de-evolve, or evolve into something else, as it is more efficient to not grow the unneeded features, or to turn them into something useful.

  • @StopChangingUsernamesYouTube
    @StopChangingUsernamesYouTube 3 ปีที่แล้ว +231

    Let's just stare at bacterial flagella for a few hours and appreciate the one biological motor that does exist.

    • @DoofusSupreme
      @DoofusSupreme 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Maybe the one biological rotor? But I feel like you could call any muscle a biological motor, in a way. They just don't create rotational motion

    • @zethwanner6755
      @zethwanner6755 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      @@DoofusSupreme muscles are pistons

    • @DoofusSupreme
      @DoofusSupreme 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@zethwanner6755 true

    • @joshualuntsford
      @joshualuntsford 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Lol. My wife works for a lab in Colorado. She’s a lab scientist and she talks about bacterial flagella almost everyday. I have no idea wha she’s talking about

    • @patrickhowden1601
      @patrickhowden1601 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Smart comment. This yt guy “Its ok to be smart” LoL, doesn’t know about the flagella, otherwise he would have mentioned it. But then he would have to explain how it came about, and I don’t think he’s so smart that he could do that.

  • @heronb.4965
    @heronb.4965 3 ปีที่แล้ว +247

    I swear the moment you said "aren't dolphins three-limbed animals?" my brain broke

    • @pseudodao7040
      @pseudodao7040 3 ปีที่แล้ว +42

      If you inhale glue before bed, your brain will seal back while you sleep.

    • @stefansauvageonwhat-a-twis1369
      @stefansauvageonwhat-a-twis1369 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Some have 5!

    • @MarlowPreston
      @MarlowPreston 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @@pseudodao7040 Warning, side effects may include but are not limited to, clogged sinuses, coughing, difficulty breathing, and death.

    • @pseudodao7040
      @pseudodao7040 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@MarlowPreston so inhaling glue leads to covid? Whaaaat?

    • @Kurayamiblack
      @Kurayamiblack 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@pseudodao7040 So that's what China was doing... No wonder they tried to hide it, that's embarrassing

  • @DeFaulty101
    @DeFaulty101 17 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    TL;DR, I explain how evolution could actually produce lazer zebras (2nd paragraph if low on time or patience).
    I can appreciate that answering all questions pertaining to the abilities of evolution with the appropriate degree of nuance is no small task. This is why I have always found it useful to employ what I call 'conjecturifics' or 'conjecturific language;' language denoting an appropriate degree of uncertainty, such as "perhaps" when you are giving one two possible explanations where you have no inclinations, "I suspect" when it is your prefered explanation but not by a wide margin, 'I am confident' when it *is* prefered by a wide margin (ideally for good reason), etc. You actually did a pretty decent job of this, but I have an objection.
    When discussing the 'zebras acquiring lazer weapons' being impossible because of the transitionary stages being less fit, you assume the only path is one where components of the weapon would be acquired one at a time, and the weapon would only be useful upon completion. In reality, this is not the only path. There is the evolutionary path taken, for example, by the camera / eye. The eye started as a bit of light-sensitive brain tissue. This enabled early acquatic animals to determine when a predator was approaching, because a small amount of light was penetrating their outer layers - just as we can still see some of the light when we cover a flashlight with our hands - and this light was now being obscured. Over time, the tissue covering this light sensitive brain-matter was lost, leaving these early eyes exposed. Over time, that brain tissue specialized for photon detection exclusively. Over time, eyes changed shape into a chamber (from which the word "camera" is derrived) with a pinhole through which light from different point sources would be mapped to specific photon receptors. Over time, eyes developed shutters, or irises, to change the size of the pinhole, enabling animals to focus on things near or distant. Zebras could evolve bio-luminescence, as so many animals have, if their environment changed to grant them an advantage for doing so. This bioluminescence could evolve into stronger bursts of light if, for example, their environment consisted of a single source of nutrients which were stunned when struck with a burst of light. Competition between this predator zebra and this prey animal might result in the prey becoming resistant to increasingly strong bursts of light, and zebras producing increasingly powerful bursts of light. There. That is how evolution could actually produce lazer zebras. I very much doubt this will ever happen, but it is not 'impossible in evolution.'

  • @ztoogemcducc6360
    @ztoogemcducc6360 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think I know how to solve the disconnected wheel issue. A lot of animals grow things that fall off or get discarded. For example species of deer shed their horns, sharks lose and regrow teeth, reptiles molt. A wheeled animal could be possible if the wheel starts as a connected growth but after a certain point falls off. The key is that the wheel is grown around a central structure so once it does detatch it can spin around that.

  • @MidnightSt
    @MidnightSt 3 ปีที่แล้ว +333

    People for evolution of human wings: give evolution a reason; Make floor actual lava!

    • @sumreensultana1860
      @sumreensultana1860 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Or just Code it into our DNA

    • @Eldritch-1
      @Eldritch-1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@sumreensultana1860 Crispr-9 is going to make it possible.. soon, all the old fools need to go die off first though.

    • @xRakanishu
      @xRakanishu 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Then everyone dies because that's not how evolution works

    • @The_Blue_Otaku
      @The_Blue_Otaku 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      imagen if the next stage of humans evolved with monkey tails... what I'm just Saiyan ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    • @cerobalam
      @cerobalam 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Or make a vehicle to counter lava.

  • @dougthedonkey1805
    @dougthedonkey1805 3 ปีที่แล้ว +228

    “You can’t evolve anything that reduces your fitness”
    Babirusa: hold my beer

    • @MrIrrationalSmith
      @MrIrrationalSmith 3 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      Type 1 diabetes: hold my insulin

    • @gorilladisco9108
      @gorilladisco9108 3 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      The fitness theory is flawed.
      Evolution is about ability to survive, not ability to excel. As long as a mutation does not kill before the mutant can breed, the evolution happens.
      Your babirusa example is one that refute that theory. Another example is the sickle cell mutation in Sub Saharan people. Both made the mutants less fit.

    • @dougthedonkey1805
      @dougthedonkey1805 3 ปีที่แล้ว +60

      @@gorilladisco9108 the sickle cell mutation is actually to combat malaria. As a recessive gene, it offers protection at the risk of your children possibly dying if your partner has the gene as well. Instead of nearly 100% of your children dying from malaria, about 25% will have both genes and die, about 50% will have one out of two and be malaria-resistant while also not displaying sickle cell anemia, and about 25% will not have any anemia genes and will likely die of malaria. I’m sure there’s more at play than just the Eighth Grade Punnet Square™, but this is a simplified version of what happens that gets the point across well enough

    • @gorilladisco9108
      @gorilladisco9108 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dougthedonkey1805 It indeed made the mutant less fit than the normal version of the species.

    • @dougthedonkey1805
      @dougthedonkey1805 3 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      @@gorilladisco9108 did you read what I said?

  • @bhavyagupta8195
    @bhavyagupta8195 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wow!
    I didn't expected reference to "his dark material" here!

  • @alexmoon273
    @alexmoon273 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I feel like this is different for us because we get to decide to a large extent which traits get passed on due to most people being able to reproduce regardless of potential harmful traits. Hell we literally did it with dogs, food, bacteria, etc.

  • @asandax6
    @asandax6 3 ปีที่แล้ว +536

    Humans: Why hasn't evolution made zebras with Lasers.
    Evolution: You idiot I evolved you so you can make those things, Have you forgotten You are part of me?

    • @pomtubes1205
      @pomtubes1205 3 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      Wait, so evolution is god now? How the turn tables.

    • @gamingcreatesworlddd2425
      @gamingcreatesworlddd2425 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      @@pomtubes1205 evolution is adaptation generation after generation for many years

    • @pomtubes1205
      @pomtubes1205 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@gamingcreatesworlddd2425 I believe the earth is a cube. I don't comprehend.

    • @pomtubes1205
      @pomtubes1205 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      @Sir Slimy No... how can it be a donut if you can't eat it?

    • @YokoX23
      @YokoX23 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      @@pomtubes1205 actually you can eat it, just not the whole thing.... And it's better to eat the junk growing on the surface.

  • @ClemensAlive
    @ClemensAlive 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2038

    Ok, so why is my body evolving a fat belly for me?
    That's clearly a loss in fitness. :(

    • @bencui1045
      @bencui1045 3 ปีที่แล้ว +175

      Because evolution didn’t account for excess food. Weight loss programs or just living with some belly fat are deemed “good enough” for humans to survive.

    • @zukodude487987
      @zukodude487987 3 ปีที่แล้ว +138

      We evolved in a food scarce environment and we have only had an abundance of food for the last 100 years so we have not had enough time to adapt to this new age of abundance.

    • @jarzez
      @jarzez 3 ปีที่แล้ว +77

      @@zukodude487987 An important thing to note here is that we most likely never will adapt to it either. At least not naturally.
      Basically we have created a society which doesn't actually require the human race's fitness to increase. The trend would logically even be the opposite, a decrease instead. Because in the society we have created normally the "lower class" births a lot more children than the more successful "upper class" families. Therefore over time increasing the prevalence of genes that actually don't "succeed" as well in our society (career wise and such).

    • @pcmasterracetechgod5660
      @pcmasterracetechgod5660 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      @@jarzez There is no need to adapt, if people used their brains that we've evolved so much, they wouldn't become obese and would work out, be healthy, and live longer lives. We already have evolved in terms of nutrition, it's people's own will and decisions that leads to obesity, not a flaw in evolution

    • @jarzez
      @jarzez 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      @@pcmasterracetechgod5660 Well, I dont necessarily disagree with you that people are overall not thinking about the health consequences enough. But you can easily argue that it is our current state of evolution that causes the majority of population to live unhealthy lives and make unhealthy decision.
      It's not like evolution and our decisions are unrelated, quite the opposite. Our brain is simply not evolved to naturally make healthy life choices in our current society. If it was, then we wouldnt have obesity for example.

  • @colpul2103
    @colpul2103 2 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Talk to me in 50-100 years when we get this CRISPR thing fully sorted. Wings we will have.

  • @critic9
    @critic9 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    So this is how evo firecracker came out 👏 👏 I now know that goblins will soon start shooting lasers

    • @PokemonJacob-vi2li
      @PokemonJacob-vi2li 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What kind of clash Royale nerf miner-esque meme comment is this?

  • @comedyfriendsenglish
    @comedyfriendsenglish 3 ปีที่แล้ว +302

    Dodos going extinct is the top 1 saddest death in anime

    • @valinorean4816
      @valinorean4816 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      no that's reserved for dinos and pterosaurs

    • @annedrieck7316
      @annedrieck7316 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@valinorean4816 also trilobites and sea reptiles

    • @valinorean4816
      @valinorean4816 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@annedrieck7316 and ammonites

    • @asiantom4935
      @asiantom4935 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      my dad went extinct

    • @raufanega7345
      @raufanega7345 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@asiantom4935 I'M SORRY FOR YOU

  • @ninjaslash52_98
    @ninjaslash52_98 ปีที่แล้ว +590

    I think the flying fish is one such example of evolution taking it up a notch

  • @Herodotus77
    @Herodotus77 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I love this channel so much.

  • @brandonshelp4682
    @brandonshelp4682 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    This is super fun, because I'm trying to mentally justify how these things could evolve 😂

  • @robhacklblumstein
    @robhacklblumstein 3 ปีที่แล้ว +209

    "Why are there no giraffe-sized chickens?"
    Before about 66 million years ago, there were.

  • @RocketJo86
    @RocketJo86 2 ปีที่แล้ว +291

    You totally forgot to mention one curcially important thing on fitness: Fitness isn't determined by your survival rate, but by your reproduction. So going for something like Laser Zebras, it would be possible that a Zebra lives long enough to mate and give birth with a specific trait that may or may not lead to a laser organ in the long term. As long as their offspring can succsessfully mate and give birth again, the trait can be spread, solidified and further evolve over time. That's basically the reason, why hammer toes (hallux valgus) exist in humans or why we haven't outbred cancer or chorea huntington. The genes that lead to those phenotypes do so a bit after our reproduction age. People with the genetic dispositon for cancer or chorea huntington, f.e., can successfully produce offspring, as the "diseases" occur in their higher years (mid-thirties onwards). Hallux Valgus, with is a condition in which your biggest toe moves inward in a painful process, which may leave you unable to walk, if not treated, begins mostly after the menopause (or around the same time in men, but I think it's more common in women, correct me, if I'm wrong). But the trait can pass on and actually is about to solidify in certain lineages, as it doesn't lower your reproduction rate. And in this case, one offspring (or a set of non-phenotypically coding genes or a heterozygotous inheritance like albinism f.e.) is all evolution needs in the long run.
    Strange hands, which can become wings, however, won't necessarily lower your survival rate (as humans tend to keep those alive, who are close to them. Especially when they are helpful in other ways), but I can guess it would lower their reproduction rate, because how many people would mate with someone with bat-hands?
    Or as my biology professor once put it: Humans love strawberries. If there where one person to have strawberry-shaped, -colored and -tasting ears, it would have major sucess finding mates. So there would be some children with strawberry-ears, who in turn would have big success in finding mates and some generations onward, strawberry-ears would be a perfectly normal trait in humans. Evolution isn't logical, it isn't goal-oriented, but pretty situational and sometimes astonishingly complex.

    • @npc4416
      @npc4416 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      good point but sadly only a few will read this 😔

    • @spicemelange8895
      @spicemelange8895 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Yess, thank you for pointing this out bc it's a crucial factor in the development of wings. Not many ppl would be excited to mate with someone who has an early phenotype for batwings, regardless of how cool the concept that their great grand kids might be able to fly. Unfortunately (or fortunately depending on your perspective) higher degrees of consciousness gets in the way of the evolutionary process when it comes to selective breeding. Granted, many animals out there share our disposition against mating with others who look very different than us species wise but I get the strong impression that such hesitance is exacerbated the more sentient and self aware you become. Especially once you factor In human notions of traditionalism/ religion that would make such action a social taboo

    • @jclive2860
      @jclive2860 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yep, being able to reproduce the most means that you’re the fittest. That’s literally what survival of the fittest means in biology. Im ashamed many people think it means the animal is simply the strongest or the smartest.

    • @shientioh4865
      @shientioh4865 ปีที่แล้ว

      So what your saying is that we need to make cancer happen earlier to phase it out of our dna

    • @LoverboyTousey
      @LoverboyTousey ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No sex for plebs!!!!

  • @IxiaClover
    @IxiaClover ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i reckon you could get natural wheels on an animal by some process where the wheel grows as hard dead skin such as nails, hair etc then because it's dead it falls off the axel, thus being able to turn on it... but you're right about it not necessarily being a useful trait especially as tarmac roads are hardly natural occurrences

  • @robertortiz-wilson1588
    @robertortiz-wilson1588 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I like the ways you explain.

  • @xen32
    @xen32 3 ปีที่แล้ว +141

    "Hey smart people, Joe here" - JOE I NEED THIS PLEASE

    • @nagaprabhashetty8011
      @nagaprabhashetty8011 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      OMG YESS

    • @ViratKohli-jj3wj
      @ViratKohli-jj3wj 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      We are not smart people anymore

    • @jayantanayak4981
      @jayantanayak4981 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Me: Yeah!! I Missed that too...
      Joe: Let's make a new video on "When regular things doesn't happen..."

    • @sadcad8118
      @sadcad8118 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      ʕಠ_ಠʔ

  • @matias6449
    @matias6449 3 ปีที่แล้ว +90

    "plant eating snakes" I thought he was talking about plants that eat snakes lol. that would be dope

    • @rolfs2165
      @rolfs2165 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Pitcher plants can do that - if a snake happens to fall into them.

    • @Xelaria
      @Xelaria 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The plant would not be a vegetarian then.

    • @MrKfleong
      @MrKfleong 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@Xelaria and there is some plants that are carnivorous, thank evolution

    • @gabor6259
      @gabor6259 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Venus flytrap.

    • @misterskeleton_yt7854
      @misterskeleton_yt7854 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@gabor6259 a native organism of venus

  • @christopherchilton-smith6482
    @christopherchilton-smith6482 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Would've loved to see an aside for how genetic drift can modify the path being taken on the fitness landscape.

  • @alexdurgan7629
    @alexdurgan7629 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very interesting, a bit more subtle but a zebra could evolve a defensive horn .like a rhino, also used for unearthing roots for food.

  • @GroundThing
    @GroundThing 3 ปีที่แล้ว +188

    "Are snakes one limbed animals?" Please no. I didn't want to think about that today, and now I can't get it out of my head.

    • @keithfaulkner6319
      @keithfaulkner6319 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      Boas, pythons, and pipe snakes have rear limbs. They're just tiny, but they're there.

    • @KryssLaBryn
      @KryssLaBryn 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      it's okay; tails aren't *limbs* (even when they're used for propulsion); they're mobile extensions of the spine.

    • @khumokwezimashapa2245
      @khumokwezimashapa2245 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      The snakes are the limbs

    • @skknireeker9073
      @skknireeker9073 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Is a head a limb? No snakes have no limbs, just body/torso and head

    • @GradientExe
      @GradientExe 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      take five snakes and put them together
      now you have the snake king

  • @transientaardvark6231
    @transientaardvark6231 ปีที่แล้ว +171

    Another factor you didn't mention is "brittleness" (I think a term coined by Dawkins) - your hands and my hands are not exactly the same shape, but we both have hands that are ok as hands. A wheel cannot get very far from being perfectly circular before it is essentially useless - my collection of slightly warped bike wheels attests to that. So quite apart from the issue of damage-in-use, the peak that they sit on in evolutionary space has almost vertical sides - too steep to plausibly climb. All that said, there are microbes that use what may be called wheels or propellers, because the physics at small scale gives evolution a slightly different landscape to play on.

    • @castonyoung7514
      @castonyoung7514 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Everything you just said is made up. Never tested by any experiment, just like most evolutionary theories.
      I guess you're going to make me get into all the ways the virtual simulations are useless now huh. Well, long story short by the time computers came around everybody had already made up their mind when it came to whether or not evolution was true. The only experiments that evolutionists cared about, were done to test whether or not computers could be used to simulate evolution, which they can (although I think the first study/studies actually failed). However, cartoon physics can also be simulated on a computer, it means nothing. Most evolution simulations that are made, simply aren't even considered finished until they simulate evolution. Ergo it's impossible that one could be used to determine that evolution is impossible since all of the problems have either been lessened or stripped away (for instance, by making every possible piece of genetic code equate to a functional neural network wherein only one or two triggers are needed to survive).
      I've wanted to make my own evolution simulator to actually test whether or not evolution is possible for a long time, unfortunately, it's one of those projects that appears to be too hard to ever get around to.

  • @LineOfThy
    @LineOfThy ปีที่แล้ว

    mulefa are probably my favorite part of His Dark Materials. They look so different from us yet they blend so naturally.

  • @FindTheFun
    @FindTheFun 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Just for fun, we can pretend it might be possible for two DIFFERENT organisms to evolve together into one structure where one is the wheel and the other is the driving body. Lichen and Siphonophores are examples of two organisms forming together to created a shared structural body.

  • @ryokajimosensei2780
    @ryokajimosensei2780 3 ปีที่แล้ว +101

    Still waiting for a legit dragon to evolve itself to reality

    • @yachiyous9110
      @yachiyous9110 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      I'd say a flying reptile would be a good start, just add some snout, make it stand a bit upright and increase the size. Maybe add a skunk or bombardier beetle defense mechanism on its mouth for the fire breathing effect

    • @jackmcavaney6565
      @jackmcavaney6565 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Aye yo we got draco lizards look them up they are sick as hell the lil homies got wings

    • @NurseSnow2U
      @NurseSnow2U 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@jackmcavaney6565 they do be having wings though. But their size makes them sort of adorable. Multiply that by like x100 and shits gonna get really real, really fast 🤣

    • @maxthexpfarmer3957
      @maxthexpfarmer3957 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's very difficult for a genuinely large and strong animal to fly.

    • @rasmuswi
      @rasmuswi 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@yachiyous9110 I'd say one of the real obstacles for true fire-breathing would be producing some adequate amounts of some combustible substance. Not impossible, but it would require lots of energy, so the animal would have to eat LOTS of food. That fire would basically have to help the animal to find lots of food to be viable.

  • @TheAutobotPower
    @TheAutobotPower 3 ปีที่แล้ว +382

    *Fish with propellers is impossible*
    200 millions years in the future: Flish.

    • @NurseSnow2U
      @NurseSnow2U 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Hmm...is your username coincidental?! Tell us what you know!!! 🤣🤣🤣

    • @BJCMXY
      @BJCMXY 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Those are fish with wings...entirely different dynamic... "The Future is Wild" was a fun thought experiment.

    • @BJCMXY
      @BJCMXY 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@greenxmango8049 Technically they already exist, but they lack the genetic mutation accumulations to become what is outlined in that short series... also, if you're logging into things with the same email on multiple services, & don't have privacy settings that tell the various data loggers to ignore you, then obviously you're going to find a lot more "coincidental" things as it's financially appealing to those that employ the data loggers, since they get rewarded for snooping & suggesting.
      I know Firefox isn't the best browser out there in terms of resource management, but it certainly does a decent job of blocking those data loggers when surfing the internet.
      For the apps that you use, many have an opt-out section.

    • @korniminorni780
      @korniminorni780 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      actually laughed out loud

    • @Usual_User
      @Usual_User 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Oh yes, of course.. the FLISH

  • @MOSMASTERING
    @MOSMASTERING 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Was convinced for a moment that you had said "pangolins" as Benedict Cumberbatch trying to say "Penguins".
    I can't believe he narrated an entire nature documentary about Penguins but can't say "Penguins"... amazing!

  • @CMZneu
    @CMZneu 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    16:36 There are fresh water corals, idk about whole reefs though(edit: sorry i was thinking sponges lol no fresh water corals sadly). Not snakes but i think there is a type of sharks that eats a whole bunch of seagrass or something like that with is pretty neat.

  • @catoninetales
    @catoninetales 3 ปีที่แล้ว +237

    Alternate title: Why there are no real-life pokemon.
    WHERE'S MY POKEMON, EVOLUTION???

    • @abugonapugonamugonarug1653
      @abugonapugonamugonarug1653 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Would you rather be a Pokémon master or the King/Queen of the Earth

    • @mr.penguin8301
      @mr.penguin8301 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@abugonapugonamugonarug1653 Pojemon master so I could become king of the earth... because I'd be the only one alive.

    • @isaz2425
      @isaz2425 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      they exist, they are called animals. But we're just missing the pokeballs.

    • @mr.penguin8301
      @mr.penguin8301 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@isaz2425 You know, we can just tame animals so the need for Pokeballs is unexistant, although the risk is considerably higher.

    • @isaz2425
      @isaz2425 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mr.penguin8301 true, but it's much less cool without the pokeballs.

  • @miss-jerk175
    @miss-jerk175 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1367

    You know I've never thought about human made technology like cars or wheels being under evolutionary pressure before, but that's totally what happens huh? It's why we don't use flip phones or beepers anymore, they were out competed by smart phones. It's a pretty interesting way to think about it

    • @orinblank2056
      @orinblank2056 2 ปีที่แล้ว +56

      Yeah the market is subject to similar pressures as life is

    • @danan9061
      @danan9061 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Well flip phone is back because we realized it was actually awesome and now iys better since its also a smartphone

    • @SlyNine
      @SlyNine ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Not exactly. They don't replicate, so in this context it wouldn't make sense.

    • @mohammadsaleh1998
      @mohammadsaleh1998 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@SlyNine yeah but they can be replcated

    • @lucyandecember2843
      @lucyandecember2843 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      o.o

  • @subscribetovadorcreations
    @subscribetovadorcreations 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    i'll prove every single of these wrong by evolving them on me

  • @hoi-polloi1863
    @hoi-polloi1863 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

    "You can't evolve anything that reduces your fitness"
    Pandas: Hold my beer

    • @Hudoi-1
      @Hudoi-1 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

      But pandas clearly fit into their environment otherwise they'd die off. To reduce your fitness is to reduce your survival rate, which doesn't deliver your faulty genes to the next generation, which is how evolution is able to function.

  • @w_ldan
    @w_ldan 3 ปีที่แล้ว +416

    The dislike is from people who disapointed that Laser Zebra is impossible
    Edit: with recent yt update i can definitely say that this comment age [redacted]

    • @Eldritch-1
      @Eldritch-1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Not impossible we will make laser zebras possible dammit !

    • @DarrylMatheson100
      @DarrylMatheson100 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Maybe because of the childish humour 👀

    • @maybehbabeh5217
      @maybehbabeh5217 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Nah tank zebra

    • @FrostBiteArt
      @FrostBiteArt 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Some day..

    • @Lucian_Andries
      @Lucian_Andries 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Actually no. It's by dumb creationists!🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

  • @warhammer8230
    @warhammer8230 2 ปีที่แล้ว +97

    "Evolution works like trying to make improvements to an engine while the car is in the middle of a race"
    LMAO dude

    • @marciaguy10899
      @marciaguy10899 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      So Mad Max: Fury Road is an allegorical scientific documentary?

    • @warhammer8230
      @warhammer8230 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@marciaguy10899 well, yes, but actually, no

  • @amiraljrah1584
    @amiraljrah1584 ปีที่แล้ว

    Loving this show

  • @olen9555
    @olen9555 ปีที่แล้ว

    great video !

  • @stefanospinelli9636
    @stefanospinelli9636 3 ปีที่แล้ว +131

    Me and my homies: "why animals have no wheels???"
    The smart guy: "well, to start you should know that in Mesopotamia they used to have chariots..."

    • @Spacebar33
      @Spacebar33 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Genuinely funny

  • @faesommers
    @faesommers 3 ปีที่แล้ว +221

    the phrase “forbidden phenotypes” is just so funny to me

    • @Malaima
      @Malaima 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      it is! it is like forbidden pleasures but in a deliciously quirky because naughty-intelligent way!

    • @smaakjeks
      @smaakjeks 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Sounds like a prog rock band

    • @yoboijerry5519
      @yoboijerry5519 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Most of this vid is fake Christ is the answer, if there was evaluation how come there are still monkeys

    • @smaakjeks
      @smaakjeks 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@yoboijerry5519 If Americans descended from British colonists, how come there are still British people?

    • @SuperDUD66
      @SuperDUD66 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sounds like the overpowered skins all of the anime cast is aiming for.

  • @Velyurjoin
    @Velyurjoin 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    "Can you smell what the rock is cooking" 💀💀💀

    • @weallstilldie
      @weallstilldie 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I don’t get it 🙃

    • @Velyurjoin
      @Velyurjoin 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Get out of my comment section@@weallstilldie

  • @sarenarterius6217
    @sarenarterius6217 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    What is impossible in evolution?
    Nothing. You only need the correct evolution stone and a couple of good TM's.

  • @akashselvam
    @akashselvam 3 ปีที่แล้ว +67

    This video unironically helped me with my self-esteem

  • @denaamisdaan
    @denaamisdaan 3 ปีที่แล้ว +203

    In Dutch we don’t say ‘Roly poly’, we say ‘Piss beds’ and I think that’s beautiful ❤️

    • @JVJF7
      @JVJF7 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Pissy beds*

    • @panhandlesomen
      @panhandlesomen 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Still bruh moment

    • @NurseSnow2U
      @NurseSnow2U 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yikes on bikes I love it.

    • @daviddavids2884
      @daviddavids2884 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      in american, i grew up calling them potato bugs (which is not, what a lot of other folks would call a potato bug; then, pill bug. now, wood louse. googletranslate

    • @reeyy0909
      @reeyy0909 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      P i s s b e d

  • @kirandeepchakraborty7921
    @kirandeepchakraborty7921 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow... Nicely Explained ❤