In 2021 while working for WORLD in Oakland, CA., I was instructed by the ED to *not* turn on my camera during a zoom mtg with our partners, Umoja Health because they didnt want “to see your white face.” While working at HEPPAC in Oakland, I was told I could not use the word “slavery” (I was speaking about an anti slavery campaign called “End Slavery”) because it was “triggering” my black managers. In 2009 while ED of the St James Infirmary I was attacked for being a “white leader” This bs is real and the hate is rising
you are not telling the truth. But I see, this is actually much worse than me being pulled over by the police more than 20 times while only receiving one speeding ticket in my 48 years.
@@kudjoeadkins-battle2502 You don't think HE'S telling the truth but we should believe YOU'RE telling the truth? And, whether you realize it or not, EVERYONE gets pulled over. Cops can't even tell the race of a driver from behind them in a car. If you're getting pulled over less than once every two years, you can count yourself luckier than most.
We need a Whyte Civil Rights organization to protect the rights and concerns of Whyte people in America! - Other people groups have their own organizations. - If we don’t get one for ourselves, we will continue to get stepped on, discriminated against, and done wrong!
Curious what his answer is. The indoctrination is so profound, that unless one is speaking face to face, where he / she cannot rage quit. I have never had any success after hundreds of good faith attempts.
It takes twenty years to indoctrinate a people. Some will never admit the social doctrine they’ve been taught their whole lives was wrong. Save the people who are open to the idea they have been conned and don’t bother talking politics with the rest. It’s a waste of time and energy.
Yeah that’s what I’ve noticed. At this point basic discussions do not help - evidence does not help either when people are in an echo chamber.. I truly feel like the people we need to convince live in a different reality than we do .. Bringing back religion seems like a good idea but the % chance of this succeeding? Very very slim I don’t know what the answer is when discussion and data doesn’t matter - it’s all down to power and influence then.. grab the power any means necessary and start pumping the propaganda
Most ppl aren't liberal. They can't navigate truth and honesty. They suffer from Authority bias, Chronological bias and proximity bias. Essentially, they aren't incapable of thinking for themselves. That's why the left has no problem pumping out lies. So long as the leftist msg touches the ears of the ignorant first, they cultivate a mass formation of disinformation. It simply comes down to is economy of scale. And they're winning. 🐿
@@Knuck_Knucks ... They _always_ are, but will be moved BACK to Top comments, should they pass the algo. If they are deemed to be CG or ToS violation, it is removed (this bar is far lower for some of us than others). If it is deemed to not be CG or ToS issue, but is wrong-think that counters the acceptable message, it will simply remain in the Newest comments section like the land of misfit replies. . It even goes beyond this, but any more tales out of school and this reply too will be relegated to that land of misfit comments.... or worse.
Pretty big Benjamin fan here, and weird that I might need to make this point to a cool Gen X'er from the Northwest/West Coast, but ferreal: CULTURE comes from a PLACE. Dunno if that's basically gonna be Austin, as far as what's discussed in this context, or if a partial example of the type of no-holds-barred, right-ish, very popular content might be something like KillTony. But seems undoubtable to me, that it essentially requires ppl, in a distinct location (in-person events, stores, venues, clubs/bars) where something's actually going on. THAT'S the genesis of culture. It's a shared external, immediate exhibition, of either more or less similar peoples, primarily in a cohabitated locale, the defining social characteristics of which take shape accordingly. Edit: culture died because ppl (especially young) have basically not been together, in places, for well over a decade now imo (to the extent they used to be) which seems crazy, but I feel like probably explains this whole thing.
How does one explain to people that despite the paleness of one’s skin, one’s family was never wealthy or powerful, that we were always working class at best, and considered “Okies” during the depression. And we certainly never owned any other humans. And we’ve always been sympathetic to, and aligned with, the cause of equality. So maybe you can’t lump us all in together and punish us for what a few people did 150 years ago… without being called a “not all Yt ppl-ist,” aka someone who isn’t aware of one’s systemic privilege and all of those other buzzwords?
In my case, the family fortune was spent buying and freeing people in Maryland, so do I get to check the opt out box on all this? 😅 My usual tactic is to inject so much relevant detail and complicating factors that it becomes clear that group blame and modern day reparations are untenable. And don’t let someone hand wave the details. You inevitably end up at detailed genealogical categorizations of degree of relation to slave/rs. Of course, mileage may vary, some people just loop back around to “but Jim Crow and redlining”.
I think the appropriate reaction to anti-white speech is to express some combination of disgust and disappointment, but you have to judge when it is worth engaging in conversation with those who casually (or vindictively) dehumanize other groups of people.
@@almathwasmywowusername9529 Ah yes, redlining. I remember a few years ago I was having a conversation online with an acquaintance about how people a generation or two before us were able to buy a house with their normal (one income) salary, with just a high school diploma. Of course the inevitable random stranger jumps in and starts talking about how “not EVERYONE was able to buy a house in every neighborhood. Certain people were blocked from certain neighborhoods, and weren’t able to get GI loans …” basically effectively shutting down any talk of economic issues that effect us all now because things weren’t perfect in the past. It’s frustrating and what are you supposed to say to that? I just stop talking and don’t bother.
Group guilt is a very bad idea. Every time it has been employed it hasn't ended well, whether Japanese here or Jews in Germany or Ukrainians in the USSR. So I refuse to accept the guilt of anyone but me. If you just scratch the surface of any of the reparations advocates you find a lying conman huckster. It's a scam playing on white guilt. But most of the cringy white people wallowing in this imaginary guilt are upper middle class or rich. The working class and the uber rich aren't going along with it at all. And for me the biggest flaw with the entire program is it will not change a thing; the race pimps will still scream racism every time they don't get their way and they will always come back for more. It will never be enough.
Well, as Gildor Inglorion said to Frodo concerning the Black Riders as Frodo fled the Shire: "Is it not enough to know that they are servants of the Enemy? Flee them! Speak no words to them! They are deadly." One Woke to rule them all, one Woke to find them. One Woke to bring them all, and in the Wokeness bind them.
This might sound controversial to some, but I honestly don't think you can properly understand this subject without examining the role of Jewish organisations, individuals and intellectual currents, and then placing that within the context of Jew-Gentile relations historicallly, especially in relation to White Christian societies.
That is certainly an important ingredient in our poisoned stew, but the Ashkenazim have been able to do what they have by coopting the liberal, egalitarian ideology of Enlightenment intellectuals from the 18th century. Guys such as Locke, Rousseau, Adam Smith and JS Mill (just to name a few) planted the original tares of blank slate egalitarianism which led to our white identity crisis and current cultural predicament. Marx, Freud, and Boas get the blame more recently, but they were just perpetuating the teachings of earlier generations of gentile egalitarians with cosmopolitan fantasies. The "new paganism" we call the Enlightenment lies at the root of our troubles.
_"Some might take issue with topic and term outright; however, that's partial issue. The proper issue is the use of "anti/pro" prefix which is particularly susceptible to subversion/deception in concept."_ That alone is a first failure that affirms reactionary opposition, not proper dissent from.
46:22 It hinges on IQ and bundled adaptive traits, in a true meritocracy (which doesn't mean we can't have things like a minimal social safety net). And, religious/cultural systems that subsequently or simultaneously codify, and elevate those bundled adaptive traits are...nice...I guess. Sincerely, The Resident Atheist
Those are some beautiful chickens at the beginning of your episode. I wonder what variety..some type of Orpington? It looks like they could be blue andalusians.
Ben, I am so with you with much of what you say about Evergreen; I saw much of this when I was there in 1992. But, seriously saying that reelecting Trump is the solution to anything? You lost me.
Right now, the alternative to Trump is either more of the Hillary/Obama/Biden/Kamala Democrats or the Bush/McCain/Romney/McConnell type Republicans. You need to stop reacting to Trump's personality and look at his policies AND his incentives. No one else has as much reason as he has to push back against the Deep State. He may not be the perfect candidate, but he is miles ahead of our current alternatives.
Reality check: Those "bureaucrats" Jeremy mentioned early on probably include scientists in the Department of Interior, who play an important role in the stewardship of natural resources. I was professionally enlisted to help respond to the removal of those scientists during the Trump administration, a political act I deem as a danger. That said I'd welcome more resolution on that issue if Jeremey or someone has it. Otherwise I'm on guard when I hear terms like "bureaucrat" or "elite" bandied about with a general negative valence, as if I am supposed to automatically agree. Either way, this is an interesting eye-opening window into some thinking behind the Trump administration and I look forward to reading the book. Good job Benjamin for broadening the conversation.
I'm often a fan of ppl with whom I might disagree, Ed Dutton is a good example. My answer as to "how we thread this needle," is basically that our primary ethos of civic nationalism is correct, we need business and industry to keep the machine going, and for disparate groups and individuals to be afforded equal protection under the law, and more/less equal respect in the cultural sphere. Now, if psychometric data tells a more complicated story, that's a matter for careful consideration in appropriate venues, that practically will have relatively little bearing on legislation, in a free and functional society.
If you need business and industry as a "machine" to keep a people together, then they aren't a people. People's aren't formed by a top-down apparatus, they're formed by bottom-up things like ethnicity and religion.
@@OperativeKANE That's a rejection of civic nationalism and promotion of ethnic nationalism, it's rly that simple. You might prefer a homogenous European nation.
Interesting to check out the current situation bubbling at UCLA Medical School...admissions policy since the new (since 2019) Woke admissions person (woman) took office. Worth a search.
“People who don’t speak the language should technically not be able to become citizens, but that’s a separate issue” Hot takes from whoever the F this guy is…
Lots of subjects I'm interested in here. I'm basically just gonna say, (on one point that often comes up abt possibility of state succession,) the main reasons for everything amazing abt the US involve transportability of shared abundant, available resources, interconnected waterways for (historically) cheap/easy shipping, defensibility, etc. If states next door to each other, each with some resources but not others, became separate countries with ideologically opposed nations directly on their borders, who also possess important resources? Besides the fact that the US is essentially the country responsible for preserving civilization, in this hypothetical scenario, the recipe would be one of perpetual conflict, immiseration and collapse. Ppl might not realize, that this is a non-option.
Different countries trade, and we do it all over the world. Do you think it would be impossible for these states to continue cross-border business and trade? I don't think so. Potential for conflict, sure, but states already don't see other states' resources as "theirs" except maybe in a broad "American" context.
@@chickenfishhybrid44 Wrong. Total, constant moving of resources across states, makes the whole machine work. You're describing Europe, they don't get along without the American security umbrella. Or, you're describing Civil War era North vs. South. This is a dangerously deluded fantasy that ppl have.
Don't forget that the Indians possessed those resources for thousands of years before our ancestors arrived here, but what did they do with them? I don't wish to discount the value of good geography, but without a population possessed of the necessary natural gifts, even the best geography will not produce a great nation.
It’s a complex discussion. Basically, CR was for the good when it was first implemented, but over time it has morphed into an anti constitutional, government monopoly on our basic rights and freedoms. I highly recommend Steven Caldwell’s “The Age of Entitlement” to learn about the unintended consequences of CR law.
@@Virgo904 there are indeed some bad downstream effects of US Civil Rights legislation. EEOC, affirmative action, disparate impact, etc. Very easy to argue that these are net bad for society. Do you think CR law is infallible and perfect or something?
@@josephniedermeyer4874 I feel that many American Laws set in place are imperfect , and to pretend Black Americans will ever be treated equal is pure ignorance !
@@josephniedermeyer4874 Many Laws set in America are imperfect However, to believe that Black Americans will ever be treated equal to Whites or any other race , is pure ignorance!
1:11:25 Sure yes, ACTUAL discrimination against any racial group, should be publicly discussed and brought to an end. (It's so weird that it would be a majority group, that's why ppl don't rly get it, and I'm not entirely sure how much we need to emphasize this issue, lol. Because we'll immediately win as the majority group, and I'm a little worried abt what might happen next).
My concern is that Americans of European descent are not the majority of young people in America today and so in a few decades the issue will be more urgent. Not as dire as it could be since they will still be the largest of many minority groups but still vulnerable if facing a united hostile front from all the rest.
A majority group should never be discriminated against in their own country. Something is very wrong if they are. Just imagine moving to say Japan and working in a type of ideology that will discriminate against Japanese men . Absurdity
There is no good reason for government to be hostile toward private discrimination, i.e. a hotel or restaurant or landlord who doesn't not want to do business with (individuals of) this or that group. It is not for no good reason that taxi cab drivers in NYC, for example, do not want to pick up black passengers. Same for a landlord or apartment manager. Government should not be able to punish people acting in their own best interest.
Wow what I naively optimistic and out of touch comment. We are a global minority, and rapidly becoming a hated minority in Europe and its offshoot civilizations. We are one or two generations away from being a minority if current demographic trends continue. We have no organizations that represent exclusively our group interests. European peoples are Culturally, spiritually, economically, numerically, politically, and qualitatively in decline.
Hmmmm… I feel like this guy is so politically and ideologically captured that it’s hard to digest some of his points. He might be right about a lot, but it’s hard to trust it when he’s so overtly anti-left.
He is anti - left because the left is anti - white (and he's white). I'm not making this up. A respected national pollster found that the white left was the only group in America that hated its own race. You guys are part of the problem, maybe the worst part of the problem. You hate us more than the POC do, even though turning everyone against us endangers you guys too. You are all mad.
@@seanshamblin1131 Well, oh mighty smart one, HISTORY has proven that everyone has NEVER been treated equally. Furthermore, one has to ask, did you even go to school or even picked up a history book and read history? Because it's clear that you have not.🔥
@@thesoulbrother8636 You said this is an example of "when equality feels like oppression for Whyte people". I wasn't the one talking about "equality". You were. I'm the one saying Whytes are placed at the bottom of the modern racial hierarchy. I was trying to get you to recognize that you were at least admitting in your comment that Whytes are NOT more privileged than other groups.
@@seanshamblin1131 The unprotected class? How and from who? From people who literally hold the most wealth in the country? Have the highest position in the judicial, executive and legislative branch of the country including the military? Have the most positions in local, state and federal positions in the country? Make up the most people in colleges and universities in the country? Control the majority of the companies in the country? Hold the most positions in law enforcement? Can someone explain to me what "these people" need protection from? Because this doesn't make any sense.✔
I can't take seriously someone who uses the term "fedposting" about themselves. There is a language. It's called English. It worked before this made up word.
Honestly, I can't even figure out what he means by it. I looked the word up, but the definition I got was something like "a FBI or other govt agent advocating violence online to entrap others" which doesn't seem to fit the context he's using. Is that not how the kids are using it these days?
@@cmcapps1963 it also means posting things that get you in trouble with law enforcement, saying illegal things, or making threats whether legal to say or not. saying things that would either get you flagged by law enforcement or appears to bait others into saying extreme things are all called fedposting.
I was expecting, I dunno, some facts. Data with illustrative anecdotes. White guy should be good at that. And there were a few. But for a 12-minute show.
![BOWKYLION - วิงวอน (ex-change) [Official MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/cLdnZWDaO-w/mqdefault.jpg)
![[#2024MAMA] G-DRAGON - 무제(Untitled, 2014)+POWER+HOME SWEET HOME+뱅뱅뱅+FANTASTIC BABY | Mnet 241123 방송](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Ox29z5Nf1Uk/mqdefault.jpg)
In 2021 while working for WORLD in Oakland, CA., I was instructed by the ED to *not* turn on my camera during a zoom mtg with our partners, Umoja Health because they didnt want “to see your white face.”
While working at HEPPAC in Oakland, I was told I could not use the word “slavery” (I was speaking about an anti slavery campaign called “End Slavery”) because it was “triggering” my black managers.
In 2009 while ED of the St James Infirmary I was attacked for being a “white leader”
This bs is real and the hate is rising
you should sue
Unreal!
Holy crap! Unfortunately, that's not too surprising.
you are not telling the truth. But I see, this is actually much worse than me being pulled over by the police more than 20 times while only receiving one speeding ticket in my 48 years.
@@kudjoeadkins-battle2502 You don't think HE'S telling the truth but we should believe YOU'RE telling the truth?
And, whether you realize it or not, EVERYONE gets pulled over. Cops can't even tell the race of a driver from behind them in a car. If you're getting pulled over less than once every two years, you can count yourself luckier than most.
What up Calmies 😺
Always informative Bb
Knowledge is power
Following from Adelaide
Australia 🕊
Thanks, Benjamin. Another interesting conversation.
Good work gentlemen. The Anti-White issue needs to be addressed more often.
We need a Whyte Civil Rights organization to protect the rights and concerns of Whyte people in America! - Other people groups have their own organizations. - If we don’t get one for ourselves, we will continue to get stepped on, discriminated against, and done wrong!
Who are the people that are actively discriminating against the white Americans ?
@@ShockwaveSoundwave-z2m Left wing activist.
It's the left wing policies also.
@@josephcamp8602 Check out American Renaissance. I left the web address a while back but it got removed.
@@josephcamp8602 Every time I recommend a particular organization, it gets removed.
Curious what his answer is. The indoctrination is so profound, that unless one is speaking face to face, where he / she cannot rage quit. I have never had any success after hundreds of good faith attempts.
It takes twenty years to indoctrinate a people. Some will never admit the social doctrine they’ve been taught their whole lives was wrong. Save the people who are open to the idea they have been conned and don’t bother talking politics with the rest. It’s a waste of time and energy.
Yeah that’s what I’ve noticed. At this point basic discussions do not help - evidence does not help either when people are in an echo chamber.. I truly feel like the people we need to convince live in a different reality than we do ..
Bringing back religion seems like a good idea but the % chance of this succeeding? Very very slim
I don’t know what the answer is when discussion and data doesn’t matter - it’s all down to power and influence then.. grab the power any means necessary and start pumping the propaganda
Most ppl aren't liberal. They can't navigate truth and honesty. They suffer from Authority bias, Chronological bias and proximity bias. Essentially, they aren't incapable of thinking for themselves. That's why the left has no problem pumping out lies. So long as the leftist msg touches the ears of the ignorant first, they cultivate a mass formation of disinformation. It simply comes down to is economy of scale. And they're winning. 🐿
My comment was deposited in "newest first" 🐿
@@Knuck_Knucks ... They _always_ are, but will be moved BACK to Top comments, should they pass the algo. If they are deemed to be CG or ToS violation, it is removed (this bar is far lower for some of us than others). If it is deemed to not be CG or ToS issue, but is wrong-think that counters the acceptable message, it will simply remain in the Newest comments section like the land of misfit replies.
.
It even goes beyond this, but any more tales out of school and this reply too will be relegated to that land of misfit comments.... or worse.
Excellent outlook from you Carl! Thank you!
Pretty big Benjamin fan here, and weird that I might need to make this point to a cool Gen X'er from the Northwest/West Coast, but ferreal: CULTURE comes from a PLACE.
Dunno if that's basically gonna be Austin, as far as what's discussed in this context, or if a partial example of the type of no-holds-barred, right-ish, very popular content might be something like KillTony.
But seems undoubtable to me, that it essentially requires ppl, in a distinct location (in-person events, stores, venues, clubs/bars) where something's actually going on. THAT'S the genesis of culture.
It's a shared external, immediate exhibition, of either more or less similar peoples, primarily in a cohabitated locale, the defining social characteristics of which take shape accordingly.
Edit: culture died because ppl (especially young) have basically not been together, in places, for well over a decade now imo (to the extent they used to be) which seems crazy, but I feel like probably explains this whole thing.
How does one explain to people that despite the paleness of one’s skin, one’s family was never wealthy or powerful, that we were always working class at best, and considered “Okies” during the depression. And we certainly never owned any other humans. And we’ve always been sympathetic to, and aligned with, the cause of equality. So maybe you can’t lump us all in together and punish us for what a few people did 150 years ago… without being called a “not all Yt ppl-ist,” aka someone who isn’t aware of one’s systemic privilege and all of those other buzzwords?
In my case, the family fortune was spent buying and freeing people in Maryland, so do I get to check the opt out box on all this? 😅
My usual tactic is to inject so much relevant detail and complicating factors that it becomes clear that group blame and modern day reparations are untenable. And don’t let someone hand wave the details. You inevitably end up at detailed genealogical categorizations of degree of relation to slave/rs. Of course, mileage may vary, some people just loop back around to “but Jim Crow and redlining”.
I think the appropriate reaction to anti-white speech is to express some combination of disgust and disappointment, but you have to judge when it is worth engaging in conversation with those who casually (or vindictively) dehumanize other groups of people.
@@almathwasmywowusername9529 Ah yes, redlining. I remember a few years ago I was having a conversation online with an acquaintance about how people a generation or two before us were able to buy a house with their normal (one income) salary, with just a high school diploma. Of course the inevitable random stranger jumps in and starts talking about how “not EVERYONE was able to buy a house in every neighborhood. Certain people were blocked from certain neighborhoods, and weren’t able to get GI loans …” basically effectively shutting down any talk of economic issues that effect us all now because things weren’t perfect in the past. It’s frustrating and what are you supposed to say to that? I just stop talking and don’t bother.
Group guilt is a very bad idea. Every time it has been employed it hasn't ended well, whether Japanese here or Jews in Germany or Ukrainians in the USSR. So I refuse to accept the guilt of anyone but me. If you just scratch the surface of any of the reparations advocates you find a lying conman huckster. It's a scam playing on white guilt. But most of the cringy white people wallowing in this imaginary guilt are upper middle class or rich. The working class and the uber rich aren't going along with it at all. And for me the biggest flaw with the entire program is it will not change a thing; the race pimps will still scream racism every time they don't get their way and they will always come back for more. It will never be enough.
Well, as Gildor Inglorion said to Frodo concerning the Black Riders as Frodo fled the Shire: "Is it not enough to know that they are servants of the Enemy? Flee them! Speak no words to them! They are deadly."
One Woke to rule them all, one Woke to find them. One Woke to bring them all, and in the Wokeness bind them.
Great guest. I'll give him a read.
This might sound controversial to some, but I honestly don't think you can properly understand this subject without examining the role of Jewish organisations, individuals and intellectual currents, and then placing that within the context of Jew-Gentile relations historicallly, especially in relation to White Christian societies.
A good place to start in terms of the 20th Century is the book 'The Culture of Critique' by Kevin McDonald.
That is certainly an important ingredient in our poisoned stew, but the Ashkenazim have been able to do what they have by coopting the liberal, egalitarian ideology of Enlightenment intellectuals from the 18th century. Guys such as Locke, Rousseau, Adam Smith and JS Mill (just to name a few) planted the original tares of blank slate egalitarianism which led to our white identity crisis and current cultural predicament. Marx, Freud, and Boas get the blame more recently, but they were just perpetuating the teachings of earlier generations of gentile egalitarians with cosmopolitan fantasies. The "new paganism" we call the Enlightenment lies at the root of our troubles.
37:45 I agree on "interest group politics".
_"Some might take issue with topic and term outright; however, that's partial issue. The proper issue is the use of "anti/pro" prefix which is particularly susceptible to subversion/deception in concept."_
That alone is a first failure that affirms reactionary opposition, not proper dissent from.
46:22 It hinges on IQ and bundled adaptive traits, in a true meritocracy (which doesn't mean we can't have things like a minimal social safety net).
And, religious/cultural systems that subsequently or simultaneously codify, and elevate those bundled adaptive traits are...nice...I guess.
Sincerely,
The Resident Atheist
Those are some beautiful chickens at the beginning of your episode. I wonder what variety..some type of Orpington? It looks like they could be blue andalusians.
No. They’re Soft Green Tijolulus! 😊
@@divinegon4671 I don't see them on the Internet anywhere.
@@Robert_Sparkman_07 they are native to the frontal portion of my neo cortex! 😋
@@Robert_Sparkman_07 I made up that name with my imagination 🥹
@@Robert_Sparkman_07 I was being silly 😌
You got hot chicks?!?
Lol they are pretty little hens.
Ben, I am so with you with much of what you say about Evergreen; I saw much of this when I was there in 1992. But, seriously saying that reelecting Trump is the solution to anything? You lost me.
Right now, the alternative to Trump is either more of the Hillary/Obama/Biden/Kamala Democrats or the Bush/McCain/Romney/McConnell type Republicans. You need to stop reacting to Trump's personality and look at his policies AND his incentives. No one else has as much reason as he has to push back against the Deep State. He may not be the perfect candidate, but he is miles ahead of our current alternatives.
Reality check: Those "bureaucrats" Jeremy mentioned early on probably include scientists in the Department of Interior, who play an important role in the stewardship of natural resources. I was professionally enlisted to help respond to the removal of those scientists during the Trump administration, a political act I deem as a danger. That said I'd welcome more resolution on that issue if Jeremey or someone has it. Otherwise I'm on guard when I hear terms like "bureaucrat" or "elite" bandied about with a general negative valence, as if I am supposed to automatically agree. Either way, this is an interesting eye-opening window into some thinking behind the Trump administration and I look forward to reading the book. Good job Benjamin for broadening the conversation.
💐
Noice calmversant 😁👌
I'm often a fan of ppl with whom I might disagree, Ed Dutton is a good example. My answer as to "how we thread this needle," is basically that our primary ethos of civic nationalism is correct, we need business and industry to keep the machine going, and for disparate groups and individuals to be afforded equal protection under the law, and more/less equal respect in the cultural sphere.
Now, if psychometric data tells a more complicated story, that's a matter for careful consideration in appropriate venues, that practically will have relatively little bearing on legislation, in a free and functional society.
If you need business and industry as a "machine" to keep a people together, then they aren't a people. People's aren't formed by a top-down apparatus, they're formed by bottom-up things like ethnicity and religion.
@@OperativeKANE That's a rejection of civic nationalism and promotion of ethnic nationalism, it's rly that simple. You might prefer a homogenous European nation.
@@Jules-Is-a-Guy Yes
@@OperativeKANE Ok but they, um, don't work as well. I promise.
@Jules-Is-a-Guy That is what we've been told, isn't it?
Interesting to check out the current situation bubbling at UCLA Medical School...admissions policy since the new (since 2019) Woke admissions person (woman) took office. Worth a search.
Aaron Sibarium was on The Fifth Column podcast talking about his research/journalism on the situation at UCLA.
Use of the phrase ‘kind of’ so liberally, freaks me out
“People who don’t speak the language should technically not be able to become citizens, but that’s a separate issue”
Hot takes from whoever the F this guy is…
That's not a hot take at all in certain other countries, for example, Sweden.
Seems pretty reasonable to me.
Ppl who bask in white privilege and then complain bout “anti-white racism” are truly the comedians of our time💀 plz stop
"White privilege" isn't real.
U need kleenex. U cry too much.
Why don't you actually listen to the arguments before simply repeating tired, lame buzzwords like "Whyte Privilege"?
Lol triggered. If you believe in white privilege it makes you a brain washed racist sweetheart
Lots of subjects I'm interested in here. I'm basically just gonna say, (on one point that often comes up abt possibility of state succession,) the main reasons for everything amazing abt the US involve transportability of shared abundant, available resources, interconnected waterways for (historically) cheap/easy shipping, defensibility, etc.
If states next door to each other, each with some resources but not others, became separate countries with ideologically opposed nations directly on their borders, who also possess important resources?
Besides the fact that the US is essentially the country responsible for preserving civilization, in this hypothetical scenario, the recipe would be one of perpetual conflict, immiseration and collapse. Ppl might not realize, that this is a non-option.
Different countries trade, and we do it all over the world. Do you think it would be impossible for these states to continue cross-border business and trade? I don't think so. Potential for conflict, sure, but states already don't see other states' resources as "theirs" except maybe in a broad "American" context.
@@chickenfishhybrid44 Wrong. Total, constant moving of resources across states, makes the whole machine work. You're describing Europe, they don't get along without the American security umbrella. Or, you're describing Civil War era North vs. South. This is a dangerously deluded fantasy that ppl have.
California freely takes Colorados water to the point of detriment of Colorado
We are the “United” States aren’t we?
Don't forget that the Indians possessed those resources for thousands of years before our ancestors arrived here, but what did they do with them? I don't wish to discount the value of good geography, but without a population possessed of the necessary natural gifts, even the best geography will not produce a great nation.
Why is putting the civil rights movement on trial even something to consider or challenge ?
I hate it here !!!!
It’s a complex discussion. Basically, CR was for the good when it was first implemented, but over time it has morphed into an anti constitutional, government monopoly on our basic rights and freedoms. I highly recommend Steven Caldwell’s “The Age of Entitlement” to learn about the unintended consequences of CR law.
@@BenjaminABoyce
“Our Basic Rights and Freedom” ???
@@Virgo904 there are indeed some bad downstream effects of US Civil Rights legislation. EEOC, affirmative action, disparate impact, etc. Very easy to argue that these are net bad for society.
Do you think CR law is infallible and perfect or something?
@@josephniedermeyer4874
I feel that many American Laws set in place are imperfect , and to pretend Black Americans will ever be treated equal is pure ignorance !
@@josephniedermeyer4874
Many Laws set in America are imperfect
However, to believe that Black Americans will ever be treated equal to Whites or any other race , is pure ignorance!
keep fishing lmfao!!!!
No such thing as race
1:11:25 Sure yes, ACTUAL discrimination against any racial group, should be publicly discussed and brought to an end.
(It's so weird that it would be a majority group, that's why ppl don't rly get it, and I'm not entirely sure how much we need to emphasize this issue, lol. Because we'll immediately win as the majority group, and I'm a little worried abt what might happen next).
My concern is that Americans of European descent are not the majority of young people in America today and so in a few decades the issue will be more urgent. Not as dire as it could be since they will still be the largest of many minority groups but still vulnerable if facing a united hostile front from all the rest.
A majority group should never be discriminated against in their own country. Something is very wrong if they are. Just imagine moving to say Japan and working in a type of ideology that will discriminate against Japanese men . Absurdity
@@brianmeen2158 And imagine how those Japanese men would feel about you if you did that.
There is no good reason for government to be hostile toward private discrimination, i.e. a hotel or restaurant or landlord who doesn't not want to do business with (individuals of) this or that group. It is not for no good reason that taxi cab drivers in NYC, for example, do not want to pick up black passengers. Same for a landlord or apartment manager. Government should not be able to punish people acting in their own best interest.
Wow what I naively optimistic and out of touch comment. We are a global minority, and rapidly becoming a hated minority in Europe and its offshoot civilizations. We are one or two generations away from being a minority if current demographic trends continue. We have no organizations that represent exclusively our group interests. European peoples are Culturally, spiritually, economically, numerically, politically, and qualitatively in decline.
Hmmmm… I feel like this guy is so politically and ideologically captured that it’s hard to digest some of his points. He might be right about a lot, but it’s hard to trust it when he’s so overtly anti-left.
Right winger is not left wing, SHOCKER!
@@joer9156 it’s possible to be right wing without being absurdly ideologically captured
He is anti - left because the left is anti - white (and he's white). I'm not making this up. A respected national pollster found that the white left was the only group in America that hated its own race. You guys are part of the problem, maybe the worst part of the problem. You hate us more than the POC do, even though turning everyone against us endangers you guys too. You are all mad.
Sigh.
Ms. 🐾... did you see my message in chat?😿
@@NinjaKittyBonks Which chat, kitty? Kerri's?
@@helenablavatsky9136 ... This one.. scroll ☝😸
OMG... yt is shadow-banning my reply. Use "Sort by" and select "Newest first" to see this same thread, but with more posts
Expulsion
This is a classic example of "when equality feels like oppression" for whte people. This is hilarious.😂
So do you at least then admit that different racial groups are EQUALLY treated? We'll at least take that.
@@seanshamblin1131 Well, oh mighty smart one, HISTORY has proven that everyone has NEVER been treated equally. Furthermore, one has to ask, did you even go to school or even picked up a history book and read history? Because it's clear that you have not.🔥
@@thesoulbrother8636 You said this is an example of "when equality feels like oppression for Whyte people". I wasn't the one talking about "equality". You were. I'm the one saying Whytes are placed at the bottom of the modern racial hierarchy. I was trying to get you to recognize that you were at least admitting in your comment that Whytes are NOT more privileged than other groups.
@@seanshamblin1131 The unprotected class? How and from who? From people who literally hold the most wealth in the country? Have the highest position in the judicial, executive and legislative branch of the country including the military? Have the most positions in local, state and federal positions in the country? Make up the most people in colleges and universities in the country? Control the majority of the companies in the country? Hold the most positions in law enforcement? Can someone explain to me what "these people" need protection from? Because this doesn't make any sense.✔
@@seanshamblin1131 To answer your question, whtes absolutely have privilege over other people especially blk people. Your point is moot.✔ Cheers!🍸
I can't take seriously someone who uses the term "fedposting" about themselves. There is a language. It's called English. It worked before this made up word.
Honestly, I can't even figure out what he means by it. I looked the word up, but the definition I got was something like "a FBI or other govt agent advocating violence online to entrap others" which doesn't seem to fit the context he's using. Is that not how the kids are using it these days?
@@cmcapps1963 it also means posting things that get you in trouble with law enforcement, saying illegal things, or making threats whether legal to say or not. saying things that would either get you flagged by law enforcement or appears to bait others into saying extreme things are all called fedposting.
@@EdwardsComment That makes a lot more sense! Thanks, I've heard the term around but never really got it.
All words are made up.
I was expecting, I dunno, some facts. Data with illustrative anecdotes. White guy should be good at that. And there were a few. But for a 12-minute show.
But his book and you’ll get what you want
You would love his book then: there are 84 pages of endnotes....
U need kleenex. U cry too much.
Oh look another racist towards white people. Our experience is just "made up" in your eyes.