Well, if he hadn't he wouldn't have caught the drone!! 😁 But thanks to him catchint the drone he enabled better foodproduction. It's not a plot hole, it's just an irritating thing. The biggest problem is the wave. The wavelength is too short in relation to the height when gravity is pulling on the water
You’re wrong about Interstellar. They couldn’t just use artificial crops on earth because the blight was also depleting their oxygen levels so if they stayed on earth they wouldn’t be able to breathe. It’s not a plot hole, you just weren’t paying attention even though you mentioned that the oxygen was depleting anyway.
Having technology to grow crops on alien soil isn't a plot hole, the blight still exists all over the earth and cannot be eradicated as far as we know.
I've never seen a Bollywood film (I think I watched a bit of Slum Dog Millionaire, but I got confused and bored because I was too young :P), what tend to be the main culprits of the sin you mention?
Novarcharesk Slumdog Millionaire was a British movie... not Bollywood. Bollywood movies are made without a script... lol 😂.... or thats how it seems. I am Indian... i stopped watching them years ago. Some are decent but 99%.... especially the big budget mulitstarrers are the crappiest. I take my cinema seriously.....u want me to spend my time watching your movie....u better put some effort into making it. There are so many movies and series to watch from all over the world. When ppl work hard to make good cinema.... it shows and it automatically translates into money and fame. But the goal was good cinema. Not the money. Just finished watching " the haunting of hill house". Marvellous effort. I am surprised. I didnt think it would be that good.
@@Novarcharesk most of them are usually the same typical story, if there even is one. most of them are really cheesy love stories. they're all musicals too, every like 20 minutes there's a song with the actors doing some dance performance. tv shows and soap operas are especially awful, the acting there is horrendous and there is like no effort on CGI. whenever they try actually innovative movies like the avatar and avengers movies in hollywood, they turn out shit cuz they either have shit stories that make no sense or they try too hard to make it "action packed" to the point where it's simply horrendously unrealistic and breaking all laws of physics. for example the doom series at first seem like something new in bollywood but its absolute shit in story, basically a cheap ripoff of fast and furious with bikes
The biggest plot hole in Interstellar was the decision to travel to Miller's planet before going to Dr. Man or Edmunds planets. The main reason outlined by the crew to go to Millers planet first was because it was the closest to their current location after traveling through the worm hole, and that it would take months to travel to the other two planets. During this scene they do a fair job of explaining relativity and the time dilation the crew would experience on Millers planet due to its proximity to the black hole Gargantua. Specifically, one hour on Millers planet would be the equivalent of 7 years on Earth. But knowing this it seems obvious that traveling to Miller's planet first is a bad decision. Doyle said it would take months to reach Dr. Mans planet and even longer to reach Edmunds, and if neither of those two planets are viable they would have to spend even more time to travel back to Millers planet. These planets are outside the huge gravitational pull of Gargantua so they wouldn't experience the same time dilation as on Millers planet. Although they don't specifically say in the movie, lets estimate it would take the crew 4 months to reach Dr. Mans planet and another 2 months to reach Edmunds planet, so in total it would take the crew 1 year round trip to travel to Edmunds planet and back to Millers. Assuming the crew experiences no time dilation during this journey, exactly 1/7th of an hour (around 8 and a half minutes) would have passed on Miller planet. Knowing this it seems completely logical to travel to the other two planets first because it would be the equivalent of spending about 10 minutes on Millers planet. If they truly treated time as a resource they would have chosen to travel to the other two planets first. Another point to this plot hole is when on Millers planet after the tidal wave leaves them stranded, Brand explains that because of the time dilation, Miller would have landed only a couple of hours before they arrived and likely died minutes before they got there. But they should have realized this before they decided to go to Millers planet. I mean they explained relativity and time dilation right before deciding on going to Millers planet, don't you think they would have realized that relative to their time of over a decade since Miller left Earth, she would have only spent a few hours on the planet before they got there? I appreciate how Interstellar addresses concepts like relativity, time dilation, and quantum mechanics but it seems unrealistic that the scientists and engineers wouldn't be able to rationalize that going to Millers planet first is a waste of all their resources including fuel, oxygen, and time; especially given the fact that they addressed the time dilation effect on Millers planet. I love Interstellar and its one of my favorite movies, but this apparent plot hole and logical flaw leaves me scratching my head every time I watch the film.
Yes yes yes! Exactly my train of thought.. Without a doubt the biggest plothole to me in the movie as well.. such a pity as the flaws are very easily rationalized and thus the scientists would never have made the call to go to the planet.. a shame. I am sure they could have gotten around it in the script more elegantly.
It was a really dumb decision to go there first since they already knew even a quick trip wouldve cost the people on earth YEARS...the visit to water planet was for the whole visual of the tidal waves hitting them and to actually showcase the effects of relativity with the doctor that stayed behind but in reality its a huge plot hole. Even if they could settle there, that planet was gravitating a black hole so its not somewhere you wanna be for a long time either.
There's no evidence that this is a "plot hole". There's just as much room to claim that it was overlooked by the crew and they simply fucked up just as Anne Hathaway fucked up when she wouldn't immediately get on the ship when they were rushing to get off Miller's planet, or is that a "plot hole" in your eyes as well?
I think they messed up the plot hole: It isn't the bags in the vault at the end, it's the bags in the van. These bags are taken by casino personnel from the vault elevator to the waiting van before the SWAT Team arrives. The bags had to feel like real cash to the casino personnel taking them off the elevator so they're definitely full of fliers. Moreover, the back of the van is shown to be empty when casino personnel put the bags back there, again, before the SWAT team arrives. When the bags in the van explode, they're full of flyers. So how did those bags full of fliers get into the vault?
RadioFreeUtah Maybe the casino owner was just chasing the van to capture the ones who threatened him and planted the fake money or “flyers” himself, so as to not lose his money worse case scenario. Although I’m speaking from an outside perspective with absolutely no knowledge of the dialog or let’s say if the guy freaked out when the van blew up or not, seeing as I haven’t seen the movie. lol It would make sense if the heist team predicted it wouldn’t be real money and decided to blow it up to mess with him though, that way he would know they had already jacked his ass back at the casino. What did the flyers say exactly? That’s prob where they messed up, I bet it was prob something comical to mock him.. Which would be the one unnecessary detail to create a stupid plot hole for absolutely no reason other than to make it more of a “cool” ending.
@@futuramayeah Yeah, the editing/timeline around that part is a little bit f-ed up... It's hard to tell exactly in what order all of the things happen, and exactly how long they take. I do believe that the flyers in the van still becomes a plot hole though, but still - in a movie as awesomely entertaining as Ocean's Eleven, who really cares! 😊
@@futuramayeah maybe but then that would have been a bigger plot hole. For that to have been done the swat would have gone down there, switched bags, send them up, then the rest. If swat was already down there before the bags came up I don't think he would have loaded them in the van. He would have just stalled, would have probably needed less then a minute.
The Karate Kid one is not a plot hole. In the first movie they NEVER say that strikes to the head are illegal. In fact when explaining the rules, Elizabeth Shue's character Ali says that points are scored by hitting anything above the waist including the head. In the 3rd movie they changed the rules and made head contact illegal, but not in the first movie.
You are absolutely correct. The makers of this video just have their facts wrong on that one. The makers of this video claim that the ref "repeatedly" says that blows to the head are illegal. That is did wrong. The ref never says that once, and in fact awards several points for several other blows to the head in the tournament (including one by Johnny), and not just the one for Daniel. Even if it could be argued that Ali might not be 100% reliable in her knowledge of the rules, nothing in the film contradicts her - and the way the ref awards points throughout the tournament is consistent with what Ali says.
That's what I was saying! Plus you know they only brought up Oceans to try and make it seem as though the originals were bad so the new Oceans 8, that was disgusting, looks better.
Not possible... you see the van of the swat team arriving in front of the casino just as the white van left? How should the swat team arrive and break into the vault before the trade was actually done?
It has been a while since I have seen Oceans Eleven, but I think that I assumed the fake money was brought in to the vault by the fake swat team in the same bags that they carried the real money out in.
This is probably the best solution. We don't see the SWAT team carrying bags in, but it's plausible. They could have each carried a bag full of flyers plus a folded up empty bag. Get to the vault, take out the empty bag, fill it with money, put your original bag full of flyers on the elevator and then walk out with your money bag.
1. The fact that Coop drove through the crops isn't a plot hole, it actually reveals the ambition of his character as the drone still interests him a LOT more than the flat tire or the crops. A more likely plot hole could have been the question of how he drove through the crops with a flat tire, but that was answered when they mentioned that cars were stronger as they were built to survive dust storms and the crops were getting weaker in the future. 2. They even showed that scene in the movie where Brand mentioned they have tried as much as they can, but Earth is beyond repair. That and the anomalies in gravity led them to believe astronomy might be the only solution. The said technology was actually first created for Earth, but then modified to populate a foreign planet.
the other thing is that it would be thousands of times more efficient to just build martian or lunar settlements. there is NO nitrogen there to begin with, so even any slight contamination would die off almost immediately with just a larger artificial oxygen bunker or dome. and it wouldn't require wormhole travel. heck build a filtered dome anywhere on earth and you could limit the nitrogen at any point.
In Interstellar I’m most interested in how the water planet works. The water is obviously shallow enough for them to both land on, and walk in, but vast enough to create the huge wave? A. How did they know everywhere they stepped was safe to walk, and not a drop off? B. When the wave is rushing towards them, does that then mean the opposite half of the planet is exposed land now? Because if it’s only a few feet deep, and that wave is huge.
Juan Carlos Dvorak I could definitely see them using sonar or something, to “map” the depths of the areas they land and search. The thought of a continuous wave circulating the planet is pretty cool tho, actually.
The flyers in the vault in Ocean's 11 is a movie trope and, anyone who has seen enough movies, should be familiar with this. Another example of this is The Thomas Crowne Affair (the remake with Pierce Brosnan). At the end, when he 'returns' the painting, he steals another painting, but it should be near to impossible to pull off. It is never explained how he does it which is as much because it isn't relevant to the movie's plot as it is just a fun little twist at the end of the film.
“It’s such a plot hole that the novelization actually addresses it.” Well, not exactly a plot hole then, is it? Maybe just cut information. Useful information, but not exactly a plot hole if it’s explained. These lists are a waste of everyone’s time.
I thought the Interstellar plothole in this one was going to be that the tiny shuttle can actually take off on the mega-gravity planet, when it takes a whole saturn rocket to get a few people off Earth, which is normal gravity.
That's not a plot hole. In the movie,it was implied they had advance techology. So it's not crazy to assume they they figure out a way to take off easily even within a great mega-gravity planet.
The biggest plot hole is how is the Looney Toons world in Space Jam is a planet that can be traveled to via space flight but it’s also located under the Earth’s surface?
Did you watch ocean 11? They explain how they got the fake money inside the vault. He actually explains it in the movie “the video we were watching wasn’t really happening” ocean 11 made a duplicate vault that made it look exactly like the real one. They recorded themselves in a fake vault.
For the hangover you asked if he could’ve at least signaled that he was up there, and that’s literally the way that he was found. He threw his mattress off the roof and it got impaled on the statue
The real plothole in Interstellar is that they check out the planet so near to a black hole that time slows down considerably. How can they even assume that such a planet would be a viable new home for humanity in the first place? In reality we would never check such planets, all the others were better options in the movie.
Gábor Tóth That’s exactly what bugged me too. Common sense would suggest that there’s no reason in burning fuel to go to a planet right next to a black hole, regardless of what transmission you got.
Yeah a lot of people (this video included) refer to stuff that can be explained fairly easily as plot holes, which shouldn't be the case. It's not a plot hole if you can explain it plausibly. There's plenty of plot holes in great films out there but a lot of these ones just aren't that.
What you pointed out as a plot hole in the Social Network is not a plot hole at all. It is just bad story telling. Still a problem, but a very different problem. That exact type of problem actually exists in quite a few films that have flashback memories like that.
The ref in Karate Kid most certainly does NOT keep saying that kicks to the head are illegal, and several kicks to the head are awarded points in the competition. I don't know why people keep repeating that myth. Rewatch it, listen carefully - and you will see that claim is TOTALLY false.
The biggest plot hole in Interstellar was them deciding it was a good idea to go to Miller's planet despite knowing all they did about relativity, given their incredible expertise on the physics they should've realised it was completely useless to go there instead of trying the other two planets...
In the movie Interstellar they can no longer grow any more crops on the planet because of whatever that shit was called that's killing everything in the planet is drying up so they can they talk about it in the movie so I don't know what this guy's talking about
Actually Inrastalle has a bigger plot hole: The voyage id possible because of a worm hole that some creatures plantad near Saturen. The creatures turn out to be the humen beings that evolved in the fauture. The same humen being who went through the worm hole in the first place. No matter how you play with time and space it's the grandfather paradox all over again,
How about "Edge of Tomorrow"? In the end Tom Cruise goes back far enough in time to save his girlfriend. However, that would also resurrect all the aliens so we are back where we started.
The supposed plot hole in interstellar is self defeating, you said it yourself "other planets" meaning not earth which means planets that don't have earths atmosphere.
One thing I actually never got about interstellar even on a second watch was what the point of Coop’s mission actually was. Or at least what they thought the point was. I know that Prof Brand was lying to them and they were really just there to do “Plan B” all along, but why did they think they were going?
Someone correct me if I'm wrong... They... Well Coop believed he was going for Plan A. But Plan A required an equation to be solved. Solving the equation required information from inside a black hole. This was unknown to Coop. He was going off of the promise that the professor made that he would have solved the equation by the time he got back. But the professor knew that it couldn't be solved because it was pretty much agreed that it was impossible for any information to be retrieved from a black hole. Coop and SARS were able to make it happen which led to his daughter solving the equation which in turn helped plan A become viable.
The movie Arrival was stupid too, they hired this language expert and all she did was write basic english words on a whiteboard to the aliens, a kindergarten teacher could have done that.
Why not grow them on Earth? Simple: They dont have enough space and enough technology to mass produce crops in order to address the billions of people suffering from the blight. They're not the only people living on Earth. They should not be selfish.
literally you just explained that the blight in interstellar got into the biodomes, so... thats why they didnt stay on earth. probably the least confusing part of that whole movie
I didn't understand that either. They said not using biodomes on earth was a plot hole, and then literally answered it themselves by saying "The blight got into the biodomes". So why is that a plot hole now?
He set the system on the Nebuchadnezzar to connect and disconnect him automatically. Inside the matrix his exit phone just continued to ring until he returned to it and picked it up. As for manually connecting and disconnecting himself aboard the Nebuchadnezzar, that was probably the tricky part and may require more of an explanation than I can provide.
@@tom5051666 right, and he tricks him into thinking it's the construct. The buttons that would setup the construct program actually throw him into the matrix. The program shut off creates the line out. He'd have a hell of a time programming all of it but they can read code from a screen like it's a second language so.... Very probable. He'd just have to time it so he was by the exit out when it got to the money shot part and mouse could jack him out of his fake jack off session.
I mean it's just as logical as using humans for batteries instead of fusion or nuclear, or hydro...wind, thermal energy, any other thing source where the output is more than the input. Putting aside that nonsense, why use humans, use a cow or something that's not going to have an existential crisis because the world is too perfect. My conjecture? The machines are all as petty and spiteful as Agent Smith, that's why they secretly get off on torturing humans and constantly reinforcing their dominance. They don't need humans, they want humans as eternal punching bags.
@@patjackrickson6733 They missed the golden opportunity to fix all of that in Matrix 3. It seemed obvious to me at the end of "Reloaded" that Neo and everyone else were still in the Matrix. Neo's ability to stop the Squids in the "real world", the spoon, all the signs were there. My conclusion was that the whole story about human batteries, Zion, war with machines was all a lie, just another layer of the onion. What was the "true" story? My theory was that the earth was just wildly overpopulated and "the Matrix" was just how most humans live in the 24th century. Zion and the "real world" are there to entertain those who can't accept the Matrix, and somewhere a small population (a few million) live an idyllic life in the real-real world. Other theories - Humans are on a starship traveling several light-years to colonize a planet. It will take several hundred years to get there and the Matrix is how they spend time in transit.
MovieManiac33 I would respectfully disagree. Both Coop and his elderly daughter were emotionally involved in that scene. The most cringe worthy scene/moment would be Dr Brand’s monologue about love before going to Mann’s planet
Cvwally85 Yeah I’m not even sure why that scene was in there. Sure the point it’s making was correct (in the sense that that’s what Cooper eventually did) but it really didn’t work in Brand’s case.
There is a small plot hole, or more like, it was not explained. the entities in the future, are actually the future humans that have evolved into 5th dimensional beings, they use time and magnetism to leave clues to humans during these troubling times, so that the can escape the planet. the question is, who saved the humans the first time? I know there are theories that the future is already set, and exist, the moment the universe was created etc. but there is no mention of this in the movie. also, the whole premise of the movie was to lift the station off the ground using anti-gravity. this whole station was self contained, why not just make underground sealed cities? no different than being in space. at least on Earth you do not need to create artificial gravity by spinning the station. and no need to have anti-gravity technology. but I loved the movie anyway.
The social network one was dumb. The flash back scenes aren't necessarily just what the main character remembers, it just plays what happened then cuts back to them talking about (or vice versa)
The Mother of all Potholes is A Quiet Place Movie, which I love but let's be honest: A whole civilization disappear back before industrial revolution due to some stupid creatures *hypersensitive* to sound and no government or earth scientists came up with the use of high sound frequencies to disturb them and no expert hunter or the Pentagon militars with all the tech and powerful weapons and intelligence didn't discovered that the soft and weak point of the c creature was: guess what? the mouth !! until a woman and her daughter saved all humanity when discover this. This movie is perfect in the suspense genre until the last minute a perfect ten is wasted with that stupid ending.
@@soraceant they were going back and forth about the tournament and Jonny was busting his balls about winning on an illegal kick to the face than Daniel reminds him about the knee shots. It been a min. since I've seen it, but it is a funny scene.
Ya, but wasn't it his first violation so he would have only received a warning. But ya, I don't know if they would have counted it. IRL they probably would have warned him, given him no points, then had them go another round.
Doug passed out and was taken to the roof, when he woke up, he threw the matress off the roof and got it stuck in a statue. They show that in the scene where the valet brings the police car around.
In War of the Roses the lawyer (Danny Devito) narrates while we watch the couple fight. There are things that the lawyer could not have known (to tell us) if the couple were both killed. I knew that they wouldn't be killed because they had to live to tell the lawyer so the lawyer could tell us. When they fell to their death at the end of the movie I assumed they wouldn't die. It ruined the movie for me because in my mind they didn't die - and then the movie just ended abruptly.
Never understood interstellar. When she shouts Eureka, ok so what did you find? And when he is behind the library and says “they” for humans of the future put him there. So if there are humans in the future, why would them put him there if humanity has survived?
The biggest plot hole of Oceans 11 is that the threat of destroying the money is taken seriously. There would be plenty of evidence the money was destroyed and the treasury would replace it. Oh and it’s insured - many references to it. So the insurance would call the shots regardless.
Jumanji It’s never explained why Peter and Judy remembered nothing after they played Jumanji which is not consistent because Alan and Sarah remembered playing Jumanji.
They weren’t staying in the Mirage nor was Doug on the roof there, they were staying in Caesar’s Palace. You can actually see the Mirage in the video there, a pretty big clue that that’s not the building they’re stood on!
I don't remember the context of the Karate Kid one, but in some karate tournaments, blows to the head aren't allowed if the blow is a punch. Kicks are allowed. If kicks to the head weren't allowed in the films tournament, then it might be possible the director/writers got mixed up, forgot or didn't mention to specify the differences for dialog pacing sake. Who knows.
Kicks to the head are allowed in the film tournament. Dutch scored a point against Daniel with an unmistakeable kick to the face in the quarterfinals, and Johnny's first point against Daniel in the finals was a kick to the head. Johnny also won a point in an earlier round with a kick to the head.
One “plot hole” (if you can call it a plot hole) that I always notice and hate is when aliens or advanced beings have the worst aim. They have super advanced technology but can’t seem to hit the broad side of a barn.
On interstellar the reason they left earth was because they were running out of oxygen... not because they were running out of food GET YOUR SHIT STRAIGHT
Yeah I've always had that problem I kind of talked to fast but I thought that the whole point of the Google voice recognition it's supposed to adapt to my voice will evidently it does not cuz I got push it on Facebook. Like what the fuck are you talking about LOL WU TANG
It was recently pointed out to me. Why Han Solo did not pay back Jabba between Episodes 4 and 5 can only be explained by Han being increadibly stupid to put it off when he had the money. This is inconsistent with his character in Episode 4 when he completed his character arch by becoming less selfish and also his previous goal of prioritising paying Jabba back. Its not in the rebels interest to have Han not pay Jabba back as he hangs around key Rebel leaders. Therefor a bounty is the last thing they want as that is another faction to guard against. If Han pays back Jabba it is both good for Han and the rebels as they have a go between and a good relationship with a crime boss who can help them remain supplied. It could also be done in a comparively short time as he already has the money.
My least favorite was Bloodsport. When Chung Li was about to win another championship. Pretty sure he would have just taken care of business. No need to showboat.
Wow, you people do zero research before you write this crap. In the Karate Kid, no ref ever warns that kicks to the head are illegal. Never. You say that it happens repeatedly. It doesn't even happen once. In fact, there are plenty kicks to the head in the other fights that are awarded points. The only one who says this is Allie when they're walking into the stadium, but what the hell does she know? One could easily argue that she's just doing her best to explain what she thinks are the rules, but she's wrong.
This may be a stretch, but when the SWAT team is called and enter the vault to "subdue" the assailants, they could have bag full of flyers for the vault. The video of them only packing up half the money Benedict sees is a recording made earlier from the fake vault.
There are no cameras up the MGM and Mandalay that I've personally encountered. So I'm assuming the other casinos, except Bellagio and Wynn don't have cameras. On top of that, the doors to the rooftop can only be opened with a key only a few employees in the casinos have. Real plot hole is how'd he get up there without assistance from the specific casino employee who has the key, not even the president of the property has that key. And it's a real bitch to even try to access the roof.
In Silence of the Lambs Hannibal escapes by picking his handcuffs. In the sequel Hannibal he Is handcuffed by one hand. He cuts off his hand this time to escape. WTF.
Why make a PLOT HOLE video that #1, doesn't have any actual plot holes and #2, uses a comedy like The Hangover as if comedy movies ever make any real sense?
I don't care about plot holes if they're something so minor that it doesn't undermine the plot and if the movie is good. I think people are so annoyingly nitpicky now. It's like they don't know what it's like to just sit back and enjoy a movie anymore.
Rocky 2. Rocky keeps punching Apollo, which leads to Rocky knocking down Apollo and thus falling down himself. There's no reason the ref would've started counting BOTH. He would've seen that Rocky slipped and been like "Get up, Rock. I'm gonna count Apollo.". Instead of the "dramatic" double count.
Its been a while but i think in karate kid it was implied not said that they let him win because he was cheated on so much that ignored the rule as payback for when the other guy cheated also and badly hurt him with ilegal move so it was justified cheating especially after the comback after the crazy injury it was allowed as it was inspiring.
In Easy A she says shes never known anyone to run off with a big hulking black guy then when she's telling her story via flashback she finds out Brandon did. So when she said that at the beginning of the movie she was wrong
interstellars biggest plot hole as i understand it is that sending tarrs through the black hole allows them to understand but didnt they all already travel through the black hole to get to these planets .
Normal Karate tournement rules hits to the head via punches and elbows are illegal but kicks to the head are legal so not really a plot hole. More of people just don't know the rules of karate.
The actual plot hole is that even now we can create rotating worls that do not require anything more than space to be created in (such as the halos in halo but on a much smaller scale) so there is 0 reason to actually leave earth to start with..
Another big plot hole with interstellar is the wormhole. How could they have created the wormhole in the future, if they never went through it in the first place? Since the only way the human race continues is by going to these planets found in the wormhole, isn't it safe to say that they wouldn't have found these planets without it?
The biggest plot hole in Interstellar is that Coop drives through the crops chasing the drone - come on Coop! There's a food shortage! Rude...
Well, if he hadn't he wouldn't have caught the drone!! 😁 But thanks to him catchint the drone he enabled better foodproduction. It's not a plot hole, it's just an irritating thing. The biggest problem is the wave. The wavelength is too short in relation to the height when gravity is pulling on the water
You’re wrong about Interstellar. They couldn’t just use artificial crops on earth because the blight was also depleting their oxygen levels so if they stayed on earth they wouldn’t be able to breathe. It’s not a plot hole, you just weren’t paying attention even though you mentioned that the oxygen was depleting anyway.
@@MV-xz7so plus the sand storms etc basically a dust bowl and drought
Having technology to grow crops on alien soil isn't a plot hole, the blight still exists all over the earth and cannot be eradicated as far as we know.
Pretty sure looper had a big weekend before putting interstellar in this video. There is no plot hole
Plot hole: how you ended the video.
Gotta get that 4:20 I guess
Whoops!
@@Th3DarkCanuck Whoopsie!
Man...if u watched a Bollywood movie... u would be looking for plots in the plot hole lol 😂
I've never seen a Bollywood film (I think I watched a bit of Slum Dog Millionaire, but I got confused and bored because I was too young :P), what tend to be the main culprits of the sin you mention?
Novarcharesk Slumdog Millionaire was a British movie... not Bollywood.
Bollywood movies are made without a script... lol 😂.... or thats how it seems.
I am Indian... i stopped watching them years ago. Some are decent but 99%.... especially the big budget mulitstarrers are the crappiest.
I take my cinema seriously.....u want me to spend my time watching your movie....u better put some effort into making it.
There are so many movies and series to watch from all over the world. When ppl work hard to make good cinema.... it shows and it automatically translates into money and fame. But the goal was good cinema. Not the money.
Just finished watching " the haunting of hill house". Marvellous effort. I am surprised. I didnt think it would be that good.
@@Novarcharesk most of them are usually the same typical story, if there even is one. most of them are really cheesy love stories. they're all musicals too, every like 20 minutes there's a song with the actors doing some dance performance. tv shows and soap operas are especially awful, the acting there is horrendous and there is like no effort on CGI. whenever they try actually innovative movies like the avatar and avengers movies in hollywood, they turn out shit cuz they either have shit stories that make no sense or they try too hard to make it "action packed" to the point where it's simply horrendously unrealistic and breaking all laws of physics. for example the doom series at first seem like something new in bollywood but its absolute shit in story, basically a cheap ripoff of fast and furious with bikes
@@Novarcharesk slum dog millionaire isn't bollywood movie btw
Doug threw his mattress off the roof to try and get noticed in The Hangover ... good research!
They aren’t exactly the brightest.
Was watching this completely thoughtless until this point and until those exact words entered my brain.
Lol the shadeeee
The biggest plot hole in Interstellar was the decision to travel to Miller's planet before going to Dr. Man or Edmunds planets. The main reason outlined by the crew to go to Millers planet first was because it was the closest to their current location after traveling through the worm hole, and that it would take months to travel to the other two planets. During this scene they do a fair job of explaining relativity and the time dilation the crew would experience on Millers planet due to its proximity to the black hole Gargantua. Specifically, one hour on Millers planet would be the equivalent of 7 years on Earth. But knowing this it seems obvious that traveling to Miller's planet first is a bad decision. Doyle said it would take months to reach Dr. Mans planet and even longer to reach Edmunds, and if neither of those two planets are viable they would have to spend even more time to travel back to Millers planet. These planets are outside the huge gravitational pull of Gargantua so they wouldn't experience the same time dilation as on Millers planet. Although they don't specifically say in the movie, lets estimate it would take the crew 4 months to reach Dr. Mans planet and another 2 months to reach Edmunds planet, so in total it would take the crew 1 year round trip to travel to Edmunds planet and back to Millers. Assuming the crew experiences no time dilation during this journey, exactly 1/7th of an hour (around 8 and a half minutes) would have passed on Miller planet. Knowing this it seems completely logical to travel to the other two planets first because it would be the equivalent of spending about 10 minutes on Millers planet. If they truly treated time as a resource they would have chosen to travel to the other two planets first. Another point to this plot hole is when on Millers planet after the tidal wave leaves them stranded, Brand explains that because of the time dilation, Miller would have landed only a couple of hours before they arrived and likely died minutes before they got there. But they should have realized this before they decided to go to Millers planet. I mean they explained relativity and time dilation right before deciding on going to Millers planet, don't you think they would have realized that relative to their time of over a decade since Miller left Earth, she would have only spent a few hours on the planet before they got there? I appreciate how Interstellar addresses concepts like relativity, time dilation, and quantum mechanics but it seems unrealistic that the scientists and engineers wouldn't be able to rationalize that going to Millers planet first is a waste of all their resources including fuel, oxygen, and time; especially given the fact that they addressed the time dilation effect on Millers planet. I love Interstellar and its one of my favorite movies, but this apparent plot hole and logical flaw leaves me scratching my head every time I watch the film.
Yes yes yes! Exactly my train of thought.. Without a doubt the biggest plothole to me in the movie as well.. such a pity as the flaws are very easily rationalized and thus the scientists would never have made the call to go to the planet.. a shame. I am sure they could have gotten around it in the script more elegantly.
Makes a lot of sense to bad no one reads all this lol but I'll give it a like
the crew making a bad decision isn't a plot hole
It was a really dumb decision to go there first since they already knew even a quick trip wouldve cost the people on earth YEARS...the visit to water planet was for the whole visual of the tidal waves hitting them and to actually showcase the effects of relativity with the doctor that stayed behind but in reality its a huge plot hole. Even if they could settle there, that planet was gravitating a black hole so its not somewhere you wanna be for a long time either.
There's no evidence that this is a "plot hole". There's just as much room to claim that it was overlooked by the crew and they simply fucked up just as Anne Hathaway fucked up when she wouldn't immediately get on the ship when they were rushing to get off Miller's planet, or is that a "plot hole" in your eyes as well?
#1 -> The SWAT team who responded (Danny's team) brought the bags full of the R-rated flyers. Did you just miss that part?
I think they messed up the plot hole: It isn't the bags in the vault at the end, it's the bags in the van. These bags are taken by casino personnel from the vault elevator to the waiting van before the SWAT Team arrives. The bags had to feel like real cash to the casino personnel taking them off the elevator so they're definitely full of fliers. Moreover, the back of the van is shown to be empty when casino personnel put the bags back there, again, before the SWAT team arrives. When the bags in the van explode, they're full of flyers. So how did those bags full of fliers get into the vault?
@@radiofreeutah5328 My mistake. I am remembering the movie out of order.
RadioFreeUtah Maybe the casino owner was just chasing the van to capture the ones who threatened him and planted the fake money or “flyers” himself, so as to not lose his money worse case scenario. Although I’m speaking from an outside perspective with absolutely no knowledge of the dialog or let’s say if the guy freaked out when the van blew up or not, seeing as I haven’t seen the movie. lol It would make sense if the heist team predicted it wouldn’t be real money and decided to blow it up to mess with him though, that way he would know they had already jacked his ass back at the casino. What did the flyers say exactly? That’s prob where they messed up, I bet it was prob something comical to mock him.. Which would be the one unnecessary detail to create a stupid plot hole for absolutely no reason other than to make it more of a “cool” ending.
@@futuramayeah Yeah, the editing/timeline around that part is a little bit f-ed up... It's hard to tell exactly in what order all of the things happen, and exactly how long they take. I do believe that the flyers in the van still becomes a plot hole though, but still - in a movie as awesomely entertaining as Ocean's Eleven, who really cares! 😊
@@futuramayeah maybe but then that would have been a bigger plot hole. For that to have been done the swat would have gone down there, switched bags, send them up, then the rest. If swat was already down there before the bags came up I don't think he would have loaded them in the van. He would have just stalled, would have probably needed less then a minute.
The Karate Kid one is not a plot hole. In the first movie they NEVER say that strikes to the head are illegal. In fact when explaining the rules, Elizabeth Shue's character Ali says that points are scored by hitting anything above the waist including the head. In the 3rd movie they changed the rules and made head contact illegal, but not in the first movie.
You are absolutely correct. The makers of this video just have their facts wrong on that one. The makers of this video claim that the ref "repeatedly" says that blows to the head are illegal. That is did wrong. The ref never says that once, and in fact awards several points for several other blows to the head in the tournament (including one by Johnny), and not just the one for Daniel. Even if it could be argued that Ali might not be 100% reliable in her knowledge of the rules, nothing in the film contradicts her - and the way the ref awards points throughout the tournament is consistent with what Ali says.
The swat team brings the flyers in the vault. You kidding me ?
That's what I was saying! Plus you know they only brought up Oceans to try and make it seem as though the originals were bad so the new Oceans 8, that was disgusting, looks better.
Not possible... you see the van of the swat team arriving in front of the casino just as the white van left? How should the swat team arrive and break into the vault before the trade was actually done?
Becauseking! Well done!
@BT23 Hotel security placed the bag in the white van. It was a confirmed plot hole, the only flaw in an otherwise flawless film.
Oops, I forgot about Don Cheadle's accent, so that's two flaws.
It has been a while since I have seen Oceans Eleven, but I think that I assumed the fake money was brought in to the vault by the fake swat team in the same bags that they carried the real money out in.
So it’s an assumption with the movie not providing any evidence that proved that is right.
This is probably the best solution. We don't see the SWAT team carrying bags in, but it's plausible. They could have each carried a bag full of flyers plus a folded up empty bag. Get to the vault, take out the empty bag, fill it with money, put your original bag full of flyers on the elevator and then walk out with your money bag.
1. The fact that Coop drove through the crops isn't a plot hole, it actually reveals the ambition of his character as the drone still interests him a LOT more than the flat tire or the crops. A more likely plot hole could have been the question of how he drove through the crops with a flat tire, but that was answered when they mentioned that cars were stronger as they were built to survive dust storms and the crops were getting weaker in the future.
2. They even showed that scene in the movie where Brand mentioned they have tried as much as they can, but Earth is beyond repair. That and the anomalies in gravity led them to believe astronomy might be the only solution. The said technology was actually first created for Earth, but then modified to populate a foreign planet.
Interstellar is a fantastic movie. Id like to know if there actually is any plot twists
Ummm.... I don't believe anyone said anything about him driving through the crops to be a plot hole.
@@Trainwheel_Time Read the first comment under this video....
Nice one!
Looper's comment was obviously sarcastic
Just watch Sharknado
that movie is totally plausible !!
Sharknado is a documentary. It really happened. 6 times.
Barney Stinson recognized the illegal kick move.
Also they adressed it in the spin off Cobra kai
Barney also thinks Hans Gruber was the real hero in Die Hard, so that goes to show how reliable his opinion is.
Wanda Bailey well his opinion turned out to be pretty reliable since the kick was illegal and about die hard that was most likely just a joke
But that kick wasn't illegal! PUNCHES to the face are illegal in those tournaments, not kicks.
Despite what the narrator in this video says, the refs never said no kicks to the face. Not even once. Allie says it -- not the ref.
the other thing is that it would be thousands of times more efficient to just build martian or lunar settlements. there is NO nitrogen there to begin with, so even any slight contamination would die off almost immediately with just a larger artificial oxygen bunker or dome. and it wouldn't require wormhole travel. heck build a filtered dome anywhere on earth and you could limit the nitrogen at any point.
In most Christmas movies the adults don't believe in Santa but aren't surprised when there are 20 presents on the floor...!
Memento: a movie where a dude remembers that he doesn't remember 🤣😂🤣😂
Just because a movie wins a globe or a Academy award doesn't mean it was good. In fact, many movies win these awards yet people can't stand them.
Hangover...weren't they staying at Caesar's Palace when Doug got stuck on the roof? You said The Mirage....am I wrong?
Hotel scenes were shot at Caesar’s Palace. In fact, in the roof scene you can see the Mirage hotel in the background.
In Interstellar I’m most interested in how the water planet works. The water is obviously shallow enough for them to both land on, and walk in, but vast enough to create the huge wave?
A. How did they know everywhere they stepped was safe to walk, and not a drop off?
B. When the wave is rushing towards them, does that then mean the opposite half of the planet is exposed land now? Because if it’s only a few feet deep, and that wave is huge.
Juan Carlos Dvorak I could definitely see them using sonar or something, to “map” the depths of the areas they land and search. The thought of a continuous wave circulating the planet is pretty cool tho, actually.
The flyers in the vault in Ocean's 11 is a movie trope and, anyone who has seen enough movies, should be familiar with this.
Another example of this is The Thomas Crowne Affair (the remake with Pierce Brosnan). At the end, when he 'returns' the painting, he steals another painting, but it should be near to impossible to pull off. It is never explained how he does it which is as much because it isn't relevant to the movie's plot as it is just a fun little twist at the end of the film.
“It’s such a plot hole that the novelization actually addresses it.”
Well, not exactly a plot hole then, is it? Maybe just cut information. Useful information, but not exactly a plot hole if it’s explained.
These lists are a waste of everyone’s time.
A lot of these aren’t plot holes...
Biggest plot hole was in behind enemy lines how couldn't they find the triggers for the nuclear missles
This video plot hole... Hangover crew stayed at Caesars Palace, even questioning if the real Caesar lived there
Videos are the best on this channel when this guy does the narration for them.
I agree. His articulation is the best among other narrators.
Yep
What’s his name honestly
Sexist pig
I thought the Interstellar plothole in this one was going to be that the tiny shuttle can actually take off on the mega-gravity planet, when it takes a whole saturn rocket to get a few people off Earth, which is normal gravity.
That's not a plot hole. In the movie,it was implied they had advance techology. So it's not crazy to assume they they figure out a way to take off easily even within a great mega-gravity planet.
On the hangover he throws a mattress off the roof js
Karate Kid - .... this Illegal kick is covered in Cobra Kai
Thirty four years later? It is still a mistake. The original KK did have two sequels.
The biggest plot hole is how is the Looney Toons world in Space Jam is a planet that can be traveled to via space flight but it’s also located under the Earth’s surface?
Did you watch ocean 11? They explain how they got the fake money inside the vault. He actually explains it in the movie “the video we were watching wasn’t really happening” ocean 11 made a duplicate vault that made it look exactly like the real one. They recorded themselves in a fake vault.
The question is how they got the fake money in the REAL VAULT. Not the fake one :D.
Anyone else hate that Looper vids just start and end suddenly?
I actuly commented on a vid about a month ago saying how it seemed to end very suddenly..but now it seems all there vids do it
No I love it. I hate it when videos have long intros and outros.
@ there is, perhaps, a length between too long and cut dead.
Yeah, on "Watch later" playlist you cannot turn off autoplay of next video and it's almost impossible to pause video in the end with this sudden cut.
it is very good please keep it
Hangover is such a stupid movie to even think about pilotholes.
For the hangover you asked if he could’ve at least signaled that he was up there, and that’s literally the way that he was found. He threw his mattress off the roof and it got impaled on the statue
In interstellar, they have technology to space travel into a wormhole and colonize another planet but not to make the soil fertile for crops.......
The real plothole in Interstellar is that they check out the planet so near to a black hole that time slows down considerably. How can they even assume that such a planet would be a viable new home for humanity in the first place? In reality we would never check such planets, all the others were better options in the movie.
Gábor Tóth That’s exactly what bugged me too. Common sense would suggest that there’s no reason in burning fuel to go to a planet right next to a black hole, regardless of what transmission you got.
Yeah a lot of people (this video included) refer to stuff that can be explained fairly easily as plot holes, which shouldn't be the case. It's not a plot hole if you can explain it plausibly. There's plenty of plot holes in great films out there but a lot of these ones just aren't that.
In the Karate kid the ref NEVER said a kick to the head was illegal! Even Ali tells him anything above the waist is a point... INCLUDING the Head!
Yep. You are right - this video is wrong.
What you pointed out as a plot hole in the Social Network is not a plot hole at all. It is just bad story telling. Still a problem, but a very different problem. That exact type of problem actually exists in quite a few films that have flashback memories like that.
The ref in Karate Kid most certainly does NOT keep saying that kicks to the head are illegal, and several kicks to the head are awarded points in the competition. I don't know why people keep repeating that myth. Rewatch it, listen carefully - and you will see that claim is TOTALLY false.
The biggest plot hole in Interstellar was them deciding it was a good idea to go to Miller's planet despite knowing all they did about relativity, given their incredible expertise on the physics they should've realised it was completely useless to go there instead of trying the other two planets...
That's because the people in charge of the movie are not scientists sadly
I'm actually you're wrong about Interstellar it's very clear while it is why they don't and why they can't draw it on Earth oh my God
Umm...what?
In the movie Interstellar they can no longer grow any more crops on the planet because of whatever that shit was called that's killing everything in the planet is drying up so they can they talk about it in the movie so I don't know what this guy's talking about
BESTEST. ENGLISH. EVER!!!
@@stuartpalmer8140 lolololol
@@therealwufator377 ok
Actually Inrastalle has a bigger plot hole: The voyage id possible because of a worm hole that some creatures plantad near Saturen. The creatures turn out to be the humen beings that evolved in the fauture. The same humen being who went through the worm hole in the first place. No matter how you play with time and space it's the grandfather paradox all over again,
How about "Edge of Tomorrow"? In the end Tom Cruise goes back far enough in time to save his girlfriend. However, that would also resurrect all the aliens so we are back where we started.
Good old days when there was no plot. A big blob comes from the sky and starts eating everyone. The end.
The supposed plot hole in interstellar is self defeating, you said it yourself "other planets" meaning not earth which means planets that don't have earths atmosphere.
One thing I actually never got about interstellar even on a second watch was what the point of Coop’s mission actually was. Or at least what they thought the point was. I know that Prof Brand was lying to them and they were really just there to do “Plan B” all along, but why did they think they were going?
Brand lies to them before they go, including coop. They thought they were going to find a planet around gargantua that could sustain life
Someone correct me if I'm wrong...
They... Well Coop believed he was going for Plan A. But Plan A required an equation to be solved. Solving the equation required information from inside a black hole. This was unknown to Coop. He was going off of the promise that the professor made that he would have solved the equation by the time he got back.
But the professor knew that it couldn't be solved because it was pretty much agreed that it was impossible for any information to be retrieved from a black hole.
Coop and SARS were able to make it happen which led to his daughter solving the equation which in turn helped plan A become viable.
@@tok1879 That- actually makes sense. Thanks!
@@dantraficonte8752 glad it helped 🙂
The movie Arrival was stupid too, they hired this language expert and all she did was write basic english words on a whiteboard to the aliens, a kindergarten teacher could have done that.
Why not grow them on Earth? Simple: They dont have enough space and enough technology to mass produce crops in order to address the billions of people suffering from the blight. They're not the only people living on Earth. They should not be selfish.
literally you just explained that the blight in interstellar got into the biodomes, so... thats why they didnt stay on earth. probably the least confusing part of that whole movie
I didn't understand that either. They said not using biodomes on earth was a plot hole, and then literally answered it themselves by saying "The blight got into the biodomes". So why is that a plot hole now?
But how did Sypher put himself into the matrix?
He set the system on the Nebuchadnezzar to connect and disconnect him automatically. Inside the matrix his exit phone just continued to ring until he returned to it and picked it up. As for manually connecting and disconnecting himself aboard the Nebuchadnezzar, that was probably the tricky part and may require more of an explanation than I can provide.
@@patjackrickson6733 The woman in red was only a program that was available in the construct. Not inside the matrix.
@@tom5051666 right, and he tricks him into thinking it's the construct. The buttons that would setup the construct program actually throw him into the matrix. The program shut off creates the line out. He'd have a hell of a time programming all of it but they can read code from a screen like it's a second language so.... Very probable. He'd just have to time it so he was by the exit out when it got to the money shot part and mouse could jack him out of his fake jack off session.
I mean it's just as logical as using humans for batteries instead of fusion or nuclear, or hydro...wind, thermal energy, any other thing source where the output is more than the input.
Putting aside that nonsense, why use humans, use a cow or something that's not going to have an existential crisis because the world is too perfect.
My conjecture? The machines are all as petty and spiteful as Agent Smith, that's why they secretly get off on torturing humans and constantly reinforcing their dominance. They don't need humans, they want humans as eternal punching bags.
@@patjackrickson6733 They missed the golden opportunity to fix all of that in Matrix 3. It seemed obvious to me at the end of "Reloaded" that Neo and everyone else were still in the Matrix. Neo's ability to stop the Squids in the "real world", the spoon, all the signs were there. My conclusion was that the whole story about human batteries, Zion, war with machines was all a lie, just another layer of the onion. What was the "true" story? My theory was that the earth was just wildly overpopulated and "the Matrix" was just how most humans live in the 24th century. Zion and the "real world" are there to entertain those who can't accept the Matrix, and somewhere a small population (a few million) live an idyllic life in the real-real world. Other theories - Humans are on a starship traveling several light-years to colonize a planet. It will take several hundred years to get there and the Matrix is how they spend time in transit.
Interstellar had few plot holes but it's still such a good movie.
MovieManiac33 I would respectfully disagree. Both Coop and his elderly daughter were emotionally involved in that scene. The most cringe worthy scene/moment would be Dr Brand’s monologue about love before going to Mann’s planet
There are no plot holes in this movie.. Name one please
Abskorditis 123 Yeah great movie
Cvwally85 Yeah I’m not even sure why that scene was in there. Sure the point it’s making was correct (in the sense that that’s what Cooper eventually did) but it really didn’t work in Brand’s case.
There is a small plot hole, or more like, it was not explained. the entities in the future, are actually the future humans that have evolved into 5th dimensional beings, they use time and magnetism to leave clues to humans during these troubling times, so that the can escape the planet.
the question is, who saved the humans the first time? I know there are theories that the future is already set, and exist, the moment the universe was created etc. but there is no mention of this in the movie.
also, the whole premise of the movie was to lift the station off the ground using anti-gravity. this whole station was self contained, why not just make underground sealed cities? no different than being in space. at least on Earth you do not need to create artificial gravity by spinning the station. and no need to have anti-gravity technology.
but I loved the movie anyway.
the very first time i saw the karate kid, i was ten years old.. the first thing i said was "THAT'S NOT ALLOWED!!!""
The social network one was dumb. The flash back scenes aren't necessarily just what the main character remembers, it just plays what happened then cuts back to them talking about (or vice versa)
The Mother of all Potholes is A Quiet Place Movie, which I love but let's be honest:
A whole
civilization disappear back before industrial revolution due to some stupid creatures *hypersensitive* to sound and no government or earth scientists came up with the use of high sound frequencies to disturb them and no expert hunter or the Pentagon militars with all the tech and powerful weapons and intelligence didn't discovered that the soft and weak point of the c creature was: guess what? the mouth !! until a woman and her daughter saved all humanity when discover this.
This movie is perfect in the suspense genre until the last minute a perfect ten is wasted with that stupid ending.
Jonny brings up the illegal kick in the new karate kid series on TH-cam. It was actually a really funny scene
What does he say about it?
@@soraceant they were going back and forth about the tournament and Jonny was busting his balls about winning on an illegal kick to the face than Daniel reminds him about the knee shots. It been a min. since I've seen it, but it is a funny scene.
@@ghostface3655 oof
Ya, but wasn't it his first violation so he would have only received a warning. But ya, I don't know if they would have counted it. IRL they probably would have warned him, given him no points, then had them go another round.
@@oneeyedking7465 yep
Doug passed out and was taken to the roof, when he woke up, he threw the matress off the roof and got it stuck in a statue. They show that in the scene where the valet brings the police car around.
In War of the Roses the lawyer (Danny Devito) narrates while we watch the couple fight. There are things that the lawyer could not have known (to tell us) if the couple were both killed. I knew that they wouldn't be killed because they had to live to tell the lawyer so the lawyer could tell us. When they fell to their death at the end of the movie I assumed they wouldn't die. It ruined the movie for me because in my mind they didn't die - and then the movie just ended abruptly.
You can kick the head in Karate tournaments. However you cant punch, knee, or elbow.
Never understood interstellar. When she shouts Eureka, ok so what did you find? And when he is behind the library and says “they” for humans of the future put him there. So if there are humans in the future, why would them put him there if humanity has survived?
The biggest plot hole of Oceans 11 is that the threat of destroying the money is taken seriously. There would be plenty of evidence the money was destroyed and the treasury would replace it. Oh and it’s insured - many references to it. So the insurance would call the shots regardless.
Jumanji
It’s never explained why Peter and Judy remembered nothing after they played Jumanji which is not consistent because Alan and Sarah remembered playing Jumanji.
They weren’t staying in the Mirage nor was Doug on the roof there, they were staying in Caesar’s Palace. You can actually see the Mirage in the video there, a pretty big clue that that’s not the building they’re stood on!
I don't remember the context of the Karate Kid one, but in some karate tournaments, blows to the head aren't allowed if the blow is a punch. Kicks are allowed. If kicks to the head weren't allowed in the films tournament, then it might be possible the director/writers got mixed up, forgot or didn't mention to specify the differences for dialog pacing sake. Who knows.
Kicks to the head are allowed in the film tournament. Dutch scored a point against Daniel with an unmistakeable kick to the face in the quarterfinals, and Johnny's first point against Daniel in the finals was a kick to the head. Johnny also won a point in an earlier round with a kick to the head.
Today I learned looper doesn't know what a plot hole is
One “plot hole” (if you can call it a plot hole) that I always notice and hate is when aliens or advanced beings have the worst aim. They have super advanced technology but can’t seem to hit the broad side of a barn.
Doug is on the roof of the Caesar's Palace not the Mirage, maybe watching the movie would help with accurate facts
On interstellar the reason they left earth was because they were running out of oxygen... not because they were running out of food GET YOUR SHIT STRAIGHT
Actually, Interstellar is riddled with scientific inconsistencies but it's such a great movie I've learned to over look them.
Yeah I've always had that problem I kind of talked to fast but I thought that the whole point of the Google voice recognition it's supposed to adapt to my voice will evidently it does not cuz I got push it on Facebook. Like what the fuck are you talking about LOL WU TANG
Everyone didn’t just ignore the awful plot hole that is Daniel crane kick’s Johnny’s face because people have repeatedly if it’s a plot hole.
It was recently pointed out to me. Why Han Solo did not pay back Jabba between Episodes 4 and 5 can only be explained by Han being increadibly stupid to put it off when he had the money. This is inconsistent with his character in Episode 4 when he completed his character arch by becoming less selfish and also his previous goal of prioritising paying Jabba back. Its not in the rebels interest to have Han not pay Jabba back as he hangs around key Rebel leaders. Therefor a bounty is the last thing they want as that is another faction to guard against. If Han pays back Jabba it is both good for Han and the rebels as they have a go between and a good relationship with a crime boss who can help them remain supplied. It could also be done in a comparively short time as he already has the money.
My least favorite was Bloodsport. When Chung Li was about to win another championship. Pretty sure he would have just taken care of business. No need to showboat.
Wow, you people do zero research before you write this crap. In the Karate Kid, no ref ever warns that kicks to the head are illegal. Never. You say that it happens repeatedly. It doesn't even happen once. In fact, there are plenty kicks to the head in the other fights that are awarded points. The only one who says this is Allie when they're walking into the stadium, but what the hell does she know? One could easily argue that she's just doing her best to explain what she thinks are the rules, but she's wrong.
This may be a stretch, but when the SWAT team is called and enter the vault to "subdue" the assailants, they could have bag full of flyers for the vault. The video of them only packing up half the money Benedict sees is a recording made earlier from the fake vault.
There are no cameras up the MGM and Mandalay that I've personally encountered. So I'm assuming the other casinos, except Bellagio and Wynn don't have cameras. On top of that, the doors to the rooftop can only be opened with a key only a few employees in the casinos have. Real plot hole is how'd he get up there without assistance from the specific casino employee who has the key, not even the president of the property has that key. And it's a real bitch to even try to access the roof.
In Silence of the Lambs Hannibal escapes by picking his handcuffs. In the sequel Hannibal he Is handcuffed by one hand. He cuts off his hand this time to escape. WTF.
Why make a PLOT HOLE video that #1, doesn't have any actual plot holes and #2, uses a comedy like The Hangover as if comedy movies ever make any real sense?
I don't care about plot holes if they're something so minor that it doesn't undermine the plot and if the movie is good. I think people are so annoyingly nitpicky now. It's like they don't know what it's like to just sit back and enjoy a movie anymore.
Rocky 2.
Rocky keeps punching Apollo, which leads to Rocky knocking down Apollo and thus falling down himself.
There's no reason the ref would've started counting BOTH. He would've seen that Rocky slipped and been like "Get up, Rock. I'm gonna count Apollo.". Instead of the "dramatic" double count.
Its been a while but i think in karate kid it was implied not said that they let him win because he was cheated on so much that ignored the rule as payback for when the other guy cheated also and badly hurt him with ilegal move so it was justified cheating especially after the comback after the crazy injury it was allowed as it was inspiring.
what about Office Space. Where the returned checks burned up. The money would have still been in their account yet they forgot all about it xD
In Easy A she says shes never known anyone to run off with a big hulking black guy then when she's telling her story via flashback she finds out Brandon did. So when she said that at the beginning of the movie she was wrong
interstellars biggest plot hole as i understand it is that sending tarrs through the black hole allows them to understand but didnt they all already travel through the black hole to get to these planets .
Normal Karate tournement rules hits to the head via punches and elbows are illegal but kicks to the head are legal so not really a plot hole. More of people just don't know the rules of karate.
If you ever took martial arts, you'd know that punches to the face are illegal, kicks to the head are actually worth 2 points.
Want plot holes that are so stupid they actually destroy a billion dollar franchise? Watch the Last Jedi......
I love interstellar
Timeline. What does the fax machine use of ink?
The book is on hand and I'm acutely ambivalent.
I can't even say learn what a plot hole is, because the issue is your inability to follow the actual plot...
The actual plot hole is that even now we can create rotating worls that do not require anything more than space to be created in (such as the halos in halo but on a much smaller scale) so there is 0 reason to actually leave earth to start with..
In point karate, only punches to the face are illegal, kicks are ok and only above the waist, no plot hole here buddy
Doug did try to get noticed, he threw the mattress off the roof... thats how they found him duh
Terminator. How can John Connor send his own father back in time to create himself? How was he born in the first place?!
Let's terraform another planet because earth is going bad! lol, why not just terraform earth?
meh. if movies "filled" every plot hole, they would be three hours long, if not longer to explain everything.
Another big plot hole with interstellar is the wormhole. How could they have created the wormhole in the future, if they never went through it in the first place? Since the only way the human race continues is by going to these planets found in the wormhole, isn't it safe to say that they wouldn't have found these planets without it?
This entire video reminded me of Star Wars The Last Jedi. Nothing made sense in that movie.
That first one always pissed me off!
For Karate Kid from what I know, punch’s to the head are illegal not kicks.
The only loop hole in interstellar is the depth of the sea in that planet and its Tsunami
Plot Twist: It isn't a great movie if there is something that doesn't make sense.