Global Shutter vs. Rolling Shutter - What's the difference? (ft. SONY A9iii)

🌖 SAVE 10% ON SQUARESPACE ▷ www.squarespace.com/lizziepeirce
🌗 SIGN UP FOR FREE PRESET & TEMPLATE BUNDLE ▷ www.lizziepeirce.com/newsletter
🌘 THE BREAKDOWN BOOK ▷ store.dftba.com/products/the-...
🌑 THE MOMENT FILMMAKING TECHNIQUES COURSE ▷ www.shopmoment.com/course/fil...
▵ SUBSCRIBE ▵
/ lizziepeirce
▵ GEAR I USE ▵
www.lizziepeirce.com/my-gear
▵ SHOP ▵
www.lizziepeirce.com/shop
▵ LET'S BE FRIENDS ▵
INSTA ▷ / lizziepeirce
TWITTER ▷ / lizziepeirce
TIKTOK ▷ / lizziepeirce
MY WEBSITE ▷ www.lizziepeirce.com
BUSINESS ENQUIRIES ▷ [e-mail]

[@ronaldlee3537]

Interesting, in the olden days, there rolling shutter was called a focal plane shutter, and the global shutter was called a leaf shutter, which looks like pedals on a flower, and when you press the shutter release button, all of the blades open at the same time, functioning like an electronic global shutter. In the bygone days focal plane shutter were the "cat's meow" because you can achieve shutter speeds commonly to 1/1000 or even 1/2000, but leaf shutters could only go to 1/500, so you really didn't see too much of the distortion.

[@bigshooter461]

So many technical aspects of the equipment used for creative work are oddly specific and work in ways that many people just don't want to; know, or have to manage. Rolling shutter is one of those things that pros used to spend big money to eliminate to avoid distracting distortion. there are workarounds and most definitely better tools. I know you have touched on film photography before, it feels like it's been a while, but there are some stills cameras that use Leaf shutters in the lens, that also make for much nicer use of flash given sync at all shutter speeds. I enjoy the videos you make that delve into aspects of creation that employ some thoughtful consideration. ❤

[@Lofote]

04:00 Please note that there can be LED flicker issues in video (or neon light flicker, LED are not the only flickering light source), just not in one frame anymore. If you shoot at 120fps video (or photo) some of the frames will be lighter than the others, as it will see sometimes full lit, and sometimes dark.
But the banding within ONE single frame is gone :).

[@BlackapinoTheTechGuy]

*I just love your energy and Smile, very warm and inviting and I'm glad to have subbed to your channel*

[@Valleedbrume]

The A9-3 is $5,998.00 US

[@domdrone6766]

Unfortunately this A9 cost is 7000 at the moment 😅

[@p.kmations]

Nice

[@adden2242]

wow the Sony a9, I could never afford that too pricey here in asia..

[@roadshoulderphotography683]

I'm showing that the A9 iii with global shutter at only $5998 not the $8200.... big difference

[@Nova-dy6fq]

She listed the price in Canadian dollars that's why it said CAD on the screen.

[@evaantoniia]

Uh, this is cool :)

[@sijilo]

😊

[@raoufpercy]

But at what cost ? 10k€ investment I'm not ready to do rn 😂

[@jacobheinrich4919]

It's new, you're best to stick with what you got. But by the tike you need new gear, it will probably be the standard

[@DigiDriftZone]

Amazing but shame about the drop in dynamic range to aps-c levels… it’s not a straightforward upgrade.

[@djrease7354]

A9iii is aimed at sports so dynamic range not a priority, speed is priority.. For Dynamic Range the slower higher resolution A7R series should suffice, …

[@DigiDriftZone]

@@djrease7354 indeed, just worth noting as it’s a bit of a specialised purpose camera, not an all round upgrade for video shooter. The way way way cheaper zv-e1 still has advantages if you aren’t shooting sports and do care about dynamic range and low light performance for example.