You couldn’t pay me to pick the new C63 over the E63.. The whole downsizing thing just isn’t for me.. The good ol’ days wasn’t even that long ago 😭🤏🏽 When the M5 had a V10, the M3 a V8 and AMGs used supercharged V8s and a N/A 6.2..
For real, I honestly would take the A45s over the new C63 because there is something cool about a small car moving that fast + you expect an A class to have a 4 cylinder...not the C63
@@gullible119 was here to say this. Better sounding engine, feels stronger, you can go even more insane with mods, and having owned a TTRS Mk3 for while now, I don't think I'll ever sell it.
To be honest, I've always loved the C63 due to the W204 generation, but after driving a 2016 E63s, I fell in love with the E63s over pretty much any other car. The S63 I'm sure would be amazing as well, but at that point just seems to be too much. These new 63 models are overall disappointing from a performance standpoint, although I don't doubt they'd be comfortable
Motor mounts did that mine. Hard launches messes up with the electronic mounts. The computer thinks the engine is tilting, and cuts power to save the front axles.
@@snakeeyes9246 They can, they just announced the CLE with the V8 when they were going to put a 4-cylinder in that car but the public was outraged and they listened. It's just stupid politicians regulating vehicles too much to the point where auto manufactures are resorting into a cleaner environment with batteries when battery production is literally powered and created with CO2
These are known to have issues with the exhaust valves. If an error code is give for the flaps, the car thinks they are closed, thus lowering the power in a soft limp mode
@@teamracing07 I had the same issue with mine driver side valve was stuck closed, it knew and lowered the boost wouldn’t give power past 4k, zero fault codes or anything diagnostic. Mapped them open and zero issues for last 2.5 years, should run a 11.1 standard with a good launch
Rory and Nick are easily the best co-presenters on this channel. Genuine guys with no inflated egos, unlike others I could mention. They are happy to let the cars do the talking.
Interesting how the Mercedes E63 AMG completed the quarter mile time in 12.1 seconds when it meant to complete it in 11.1 seconds, which is quicker than the C63
@@blazesmooth5573 i missed that but untill they show a e36 m3 evo beating a e46 m3 im not changing my opinion. Questionable examples of cars, questionable driving. This is not the first race that raises eyebrows. Tesla's supposedly monsters according to carwow, in real life ive beaten dual motor model 3 with stage 1 pd130, imagine what something else would do.
9:06 The comparison was on two different model year E63 AMGs. One was an older 2017/18 model, the other was a newer 2020/21 model. You can tell by the headlights, interior, steering wheel, rims, etc, etc. The MBUX System upgrades alone from 2018 to 2021 are fairly significant... While Merc doesn't promote this, the numbers don't lie; the proof is in the pudding. Seemingly a big difference in engine performance through CPU/ECU/TCU upgrades... or, alterations shall we say. While designed to limit to the same hp and torque numbers as the previous models in order to keep more power for the GT 63. models, one may consider the fine print... 603hp at between 5,500-6000 RPM vs 5,500 RMP flat. Older one MAY* require pushing the engine a bit more to achieve the same results---if it every can truly get to those numbers (especially with engine wear over time). That's just one side of the argument... and I'm impartial to both.
Funny how Merc keeps sticking the "63" badge on, while under the hood is just a 4-cylinder matchbox. They're ashamed of small engines, we know that. And the worst part is, they know we know that. What a joke!
E63 dont have 6.3L engine and nobody blinks an eye. First ever AMG was a 3.6L 6-cylinder even so saying "it is not real AMG without V8" is just bullshit. There are no Turbos in Taycan Turbo S but yet it is Turbo S... There is a 1.3L engine in Koenigsegg and people call it engineering marvel. Yet when Merc does fast Formula 1 style hybrid it is a "shame to Mercedes".
@L1ven, good points.. The M139 is currently the most powerful 4-cyl 2.0 litre production engine in the world. People ignore the engineering talent behind it.
@@ologmcnoleg2487 well, If I drove that engine, maybe I would find it amazing indeed. But the point would still be relevant - why do they label this engine with the badge that is totally unrelated to it now? It's like 25 years ago all BMWs were easily identified: 520i had 2 litre engine, 530 had 3 litre engine, etc. Then they started to put 1.8L and yet called sych cars "320i". I find it absurd.
AMG has really cheapened its name by putting out all of these 4 cylinder models. They could’ve at least made the C63 a V6 hybrid. I mean look at BMW still putting a V8 in the M5. Mercedes have completely misread what consumers want.
If I want a popping and banging 4 cilinder I can buy 3 Golf Rs for the same price as a C63 AMG. In that price range I expect something really special. Yes a v8 or at minimum a v6. It is also about the experience. I wouldn’t care if the 4 cilinder is faster. A v8 is an entirely different experience and something special.
7:06 - More like "another knife to this taser fight" because that new C63 is all about electricity. Without the electric power it wouldn't stand a chance against the other two "knifes" that have the same engine.
@@Alexdbre the C already has 50hp more only with little tweaks to the engine. 550hp ECU tunes already did 100.000km+. 80hp increase plus an e-turbo would be an awesome spec for a higher trim
@@Alexdbrethe A45 is not at its limits. People have pushed them to 600+ with no issues. There’s plenty in the mid 10 second range with an upgraded turbo.
Not only that, they brought a 2017 car to this race. That is not the fastest e63s, they would’ve never brought the first version of an M5 F90 to these races. When it comes to Mercedes they really mess things up
@@sanskarmohanty9939 in earlier times biturbo meant 2 turbos of the same size, starting at the same rpm. Twinturbo meant two turbos of different size, mostly a small one for faster throttle response working at lower revs and a large one for the upper revs. (BMW even built a Triturbo 3L inline 6 Diesel at some point. The 535d and 335d they were called iirc And Mercedes experimented with 3 turbos on the V6 Turbodiesel for some time where they mixed the principle completely: 2 small turbos, one for each bank and one large one for both banks and higher revs and more boost. They ditched it for too much complexity and never put it in production i think.) But at some point nobody cared to use the terms this way anymore and so today they are used interchangably mostly.
The A45 is my favorite lil car on this video! I was waiting for this! Also where is the white e63s estate you guys used in the last video? I was gonna type that I wish the A45 was tuned to atleast 600hp to keep up with these too, but I waited for to see the results then Nick comes with a tuned A45 😆 Great vid as always 👍🏻
I bet some one tried to "optimize" the ECU of the E63 and totally spoiled the settings. This happens often because with an ECU modification, not just one ECU, but also many inconspicuous ones have also to be adapted.
well, you need to do the Revs / Sound check a bit "different" Switch to S+ or Race, go into "P" and pull the up or down shift on your steering wheel. Try it, works for the C63 and A45
What's interesting is that VAG EA888 motor is arguably the greatest modern tuner engine out there. In my 2015 MK7 Golf R, with just a simple downpipe and APR stage 2 ECU tune, I was reaching just under 11.7 in the 1/4, and 0-60 in 3.51. They are putting down similar times, with just simple tunes and the A45s has about 130 more HP stock for stock.
Matt a good test for the new C63 would be taking a sporty roadtrip through Scotland without charging the car and seeing if you would be mostly driving the 4 cylinder engine.
Now you understand what's is do or can do e turbo charger always beat any turbo more heavy vs others still beat them all. The fun is a45s beat v8 this shame.
476 hp from a 2.0L is nuts. If the 4.0L had that specific output, it would make 952 hp. Which is obvious, but puts into perspective how hard that 4 cylinder engine is working
As always a great race and video👍 When you show the stats on screen you should also put up the power to weight ratio. And you should put the C-class AMG up against the Tesla model 3 Performance.
Those 2 A45 gave me an idea. Get the same car 3 times, do all the challenges and see which performes a bit better. Nearly all cars don't perform the same also when it's the same car. This would be interesting
That is so disappointing that the E63 wasn’t performing at it’s full capacity! I’ve had run-ins with A45s in my E63S wagon and it are them like nothing.
E63s owner here, should run a 11.1 1/4 back to back to back like mine did before I tuned it, quicker than the new c63s… 11.5 with nearly 700hp 😂 shambles. what a shame for the E. Also I had a similar issue, my exhaust valve stuck closed on one side and it knew and lowered the boost and wouldn’t give power past 4k but showed zero fault codes and nothing on a diagnostic, I worked it out via sound. Fixed and zero issues for the last 2 years of ownership at stage 2 power runs a mid to low 10 @138mph things an animal
Mr Matt Watson, why is it you can never let us know the boost that cars are producing I would like to know how much the turbos are producing or superchargers
Sell your car for free with Carwow: bit.ly/Sell-Your-Car-For-Free-0207
good🥰🥰
🧢
Ok👍👍👍
Not cwow removing my joke comment 🙄🤣
@@jacobrev6567the AMG C63 despite is the heaviest of the three still is fast on drag race.
An A45 sounding better then an C63 what is Mercedes doing 😂😂
Bcs C63 is a Hybrid☠️
@uros.k1101 doesnt effect the sound.
Because A class isn't as new so not as strict emission regulations
@@uros.k1101doesn’t effect the sound
@@uros.k1101
Doesn’t mean anything. The Holy Trinity hypercars are all hybrids and sound great. As does the 296 GTB
That C63 having SYNTHESISED pops and bangs is just tragic.
They're bad enough when they're just mapped into the exhaust.
Pops and bangs are Ghey
Not just that, but there sounds like there’s a speaker in the back that plays low frequency noises to “augment” the exhaust note. Ughhhhhhhhhh
Yea as if pops and bangs weren't already the lamest thing
How AMG has fallen 😢 nobody makes a faker sound in this space, RS4 all real sound
4 cylinders c63 should be illegal to say
Well, if the 4cyl would have more than 6 liters of displacement i would be ok with calling it 63. ;-)
Imagine if it has 2 cylinder engines on C63.
Should have been called a C45E
True
Say thanks to heave tank with f1 power technology like e turbo charger always beat all them
Would definitely love to see a healthy E63S in this race.
I have no idea what happened to that E63S. 🤦
@@MercedesE63S-AMGit’s a older Benz. Of course it’s broken
Он не исправен это явно видно
Disappointing to see the E63 not performing as it should!
Probably a seized exhaust valve. I had it on my C43 with the perf exhaust and it cuts power and torque.
RIP to the “63” 💀
George russel?
It’s coming back.
Mercedes hacked the car so the new one wins
It's a crime to use name of 6.3 litre engine car for 4cyl 2l engine car. Mercedes - liars
It's not death, their is a 2023 version that just came out
We need a properly working E63s to race the new C63s, come on car wow make it happen. We feel short changed.
i second that
i third that
True !!
A properly working e63? Where ? Mine never does.
Nobody gives a f*ck what you want. Buy an e63 and donate it to Carwow
63 is the wrong term for that car 😢😢 love the old 63s ❤❤
The car still has tons of mileage on it.
@@purwantiallan5089Its almost new car. Its crap nothing more
The Old C63s And E63s are the best ❤❤
C20 😂😂
That C63 estate should be called a C45 instead.
C20
Perfecto🎉
the fake engine noise inside the C63 is ridiculous
You couldn’t pay me to pick the new C63 over the E63.. The whole downsizing thing just isn’t for me.. The good ol’ days wasn’t even that long ago 😭🤏🏽 When the M5 had a V10, the M3 a V8 and AMGs used supercharged V8s and a N/A 6.2..
And audis used v10, W12
Blame biden... 😂
@@peterpanini96euro emissions regs not Biden lmao
@rafuyhhre4543 RUF used V12, V10 and Special V12.
I miss those days already! 😞
The AMG won
Thanks for spoiling it 😡
😂😂😂😐
@@conor7154they are all AMG 💀
For Real?!?!
No shii@@Fefe.2clean
"4 litre twin turbo V8" what a beautiful phrase ❤😊
Four point four even better 😂🎉
@@truecamvidea58816.3 🤫
Damn
For real, I honestly would take the A45s over the new C63 because there is something cool about a small car moving that fast + you expect an A class to have a 4 cylinder...not the C63
bro they are all moving smh
For almost as much money as a Porsche Cayman, it better be moving.
Rs3 over this in both hatch or sedan form.
@@gullible119 was here to say this. Better sounding engine, feels stronger, you can go even more insane with mods, and having owned a TTRS Mk3 for while now, I don't think I'll ever sell it.
I much prefer the Mercedes AMG E63 actually
Autobahn taxi in Germany. Weapon.
Same. The e63 is my dream car
To be honest, I've always loved the C63 due to the W204 generation, but after driving a 2016 E63s, I fell in love with the E63s over pretty much any other car. The S63 I'm sure would be amazing as well, but at that point just seems to be too much. These new 63 models are overall disappointing from a performance standpoint, although I don't doubt they'd be comfortable
The 2016 E63 still handled worse than 2000 SLK 230 Kompressor.
What about driving the S65 AmG.
@@purwantiallan5089the 2017 e63s is the dream
As a e63s owner that car either has a bad auxiliary battery/car battery. Or the exhaust flap has a malfunction. That always reduces power
Motor mounts did that mine. Hard launches messes up with the electronic mounts. The computer thinks the engine is tilting, and cuts power to save the front axles.
@@S.Madmanhow much did it cost to get it fixed ?
@@EscapeToVictoryNow 2k€
Which model do u have , do u think maybe because it's a 2017 version and not a 2019 version? Is there any difference in terms of performance?
Yes exhaust flap malfunction, and also the fuel pump, alot of issues
This 4 cylinder is impressive. Even with this weight it has. The power out put is sport on. C63
Dont forget about electric engine on rear axle my friend.
The way they made the power was with a huge turbo that has massive lag and sounds awful
@@lbnewell23 что-то на видео не видно этой "огромной задержки"))
@@09razor09csthe electric motor is filling the gap
@@JStryker7 ну и отлично, современная немецкая инженерия сделала свое дело
🚥 V8 AMG POWAH or NOTHING….Let’s GO 😎👍🏽
Hell yeah the best or nothing 😂😂😂
Oh the sweet Eargasm sounds of a V8 simply beautiful ❤❤❤💦💦💦💦
V8 POWER!
Was an enjoyable day out - Thanks DMS for inviting us :) (tuned A45s)
C63 might've won, but the E63 Won for me lol
Please do a rematch between E63S and C63S
Yes but don’t use the black car with dead turbos
As a long time Mercedes-Benz customer, so not happy with not having a V8 in the C63, with most people hating it Mercedes need to bring back V8.
@@therealinterlaced they can't. The world is dying.
@@snakeeyes9246 They can, they just announced the CLE with the V8 when they were going to put a 4-cylinder in that car but the public was outraged and they listened. It's just stupid politicians regulating vehicles too much to the point where auto manufactures are resorting into a cleaner environment with batteries when battery production is literally powered and created with CO2
@@snakeeyes9246 yes because a hybrid engine will save the planet
E63s is something wrong or broken
True the best 1/4 mile they’ve gotten from a e63s is 11.1
@@ajmulsharifiyes, and average 1/4 for E63 is 11.2s
wrong fuel
These are known to have issues with the exhaust valves. If an error code is give for the flaps, the car thinks they are closed, thus lowering the power in a soft limp mode
@@teamracing07 I had the same issue with mine driver side valve was stuck closed, it knew and lowered the boost wouldn’t give power past 4k, zero fault codes or anything diagnostic. Mapped them open and zero issues for last 2.5 years, should run a 11.1 standard with a good launch
3:06
"little fart"
"Don't be rude about me"
😂😂😂
Still think there's no chance we'll ever see the new C63 on the road in the UK. And that's not a bad thing.
Could have got an E6 that actually worked - bit disappointing, would have been good to see.
8:17 the 4th car at the finish line
Oh look, Matt picked the faster car AGAIN, who knew 😏
Crazy to think the A45s is only a 2 litre 💨🚀
So is the C63...
@@dlevi67 with an extra electric motor
Love the A45 AMG vs stage 4 CLA 45 AMG VS E63 AMG
Rory and Nick are easily the best co-presenters on this channel. Genuine guys with no inflated egos, unlike others I could mention. They are happy to let the cars do the talking.
Totally agree. Love to see them co-host a new channel.
Interesting how the Mercedes E63 AMG completed the quarter mile time in 12.1 seconds when it meant to complete it in 11.1 seconds, which is quicker than the C63
Carwow is not true racing channel, its a marketing channel. I found that out a long time ago.
@@duangc3280 You can litteraly see that the e63 only put out 550hp
@@duangc3280are you blind? Or not watch the video. They quite literally say the car had an issue and it’s producing 500hp.
@@blazesmooth5573 i missed that but untill they show a e36 m3 evo beating a e46 m3 im not changing my opinion. Questionable examples of cars, questionable driving. This is not the first race that raises eyebrows. Tesla's supposedly monsters according to carwow, in real life ive beaten dual motor model 3 with stage 1 pd130, imagine what something else would do.
I guess you didn't watch the Whole video. 9:00
A45s is fire❤
9:06 The comparison was on two different model year E63 AMGs. One was an older 2017/18 model, the other was a newer 2020/21 model. You can tell by the headlights, interior, steering wheel, rims, etc, etc. The MBUX System upgrades alone from 2018 to 2021 are fairly significant... While Merc doesn't promote this, the numbers don't lie; the proof is in the pudding. Seemingly a big difference in engine performance through CPU/ECU/TCU upgrades... or, alterations shall we say. While designed to limit to the same hp and torque numbers as the previous models in order to keep more power for the GT 63. models, one may consider the fine print... 603hp at between 5,500-6000 RPM vs 5,500 RMP flat. Older one MAY* require pushing the engine a bit more to achieve the same results---if it every can truly get to those numbers (especially with engine wear over time). That's just one side of the argument... and I'm impartial to both.
m5 cs,m4 csl, amg c63s, e63s race
and an audi rs7😁
and AMG GT63s 812hp Coupe version 1.9 tons with 10.1 402m 😂
@@velislavpenev759 I'm having trouble undertanding which car your are talking about, I think you mixed stats from several models
@@velislavpenev759what are you saying
You’ve got an m5
When Lamborghini launched the LP640, I never thought , one day, a Mercedez C-class would one day have the same horse power
Funny how Merc keeps sticking the "63" badge on, while under the hood is just a 4-cylinder matchbox. They're ashamed of small engines, we know that. And the worst part is, they know we know that. What a joke!
E63 dont have 6.3L engine and nobody blinks an eye. First ever AMG was a 3.6L 6-cylinder even so saying "it is not real AMG without V8" is just bullshit. There are no Turbos in Taycan Turbo S but yet it is Turbo S... There is a 1.3L engine in Koenigsegg and people call it engineering marvel. Yet when Merc does fast Formula 1 style hybrid it is a "shame to Mercedes".
@@L1ven Comparing Koenigsegg to Merc is offensive :)
@L1ven, good points.. The M139 is currently the most powerful 4-cyl 2.0 litre production engine in the world. People ignore the engineering talent behind it.
@@ologmcnoleg2487 well, If I drove that engine, maybe I would find it amazing indeed. But the point would still be relevant - why do they label this engine with the badge that is totally unrelated to it now? It's like 25 years ago all BMWs were easily identified: 520i had 2 litre engine, 530 had 3 litre engine, etc. Then they started to put 1.8L and yet called sych cars "320i". I find it absurd.
Over £63K for a 2 litre 4 cylinder hot hatch? 😂😂😂
2:51 A45S Sound >>> C63 S E Sound
Sad times.
@@blackwidow7804 what do you say?
@@NguyenNhanQKhanh he said, “Sad times."
@@rian0xFFF What is Sad times?
@@NguyenNhanQKhanh a time that is sad
We love seeing more of Rory. Please keep on bringing him back
AMG has really cheapened its name by putting out all of these 4 cylinder models. They could’ve at least made the C63 a V6 hybrid. I mean look at BMW still putting a V8 in the M5. Mercedes have completely misread what consumers want.
If I want a popping and banging 4 cilinder I can buy 3 Golf Rs for the same price as a C63 AMG. In that price range I expect something really special. Yes a v8 or at minimum a v6. It is also about the experience. I wouldn’t care if the 4 cilinder is faster. A v8 is an entirely different experience and something special.
can't deny the fact that the c63 stood up in all terms except sound. well engineered.
RESULTS
1st AMG
2nd AMG
3rd AMG
7:06 - More like "another knife to this taser fight" because that new C63 is all about electricity. Without the electric power it wouldn't stand a chance against the other two "knifes" that have the same engine.
The A45s is a BEAST. AMG has to bring a 500hp r model of rhat
Don't know if possible though, the A45s is pretty much at its limits, the C43 with the same engine proves it, not much of a "tuning" headroom
@@Alexdbre the C already has 50hp more only with little tweaks to the engine. 550hp ECU tunes already did 100.000km+. 80hp increase plus an e-turbo would be an awesome spec for a higher trim
@@Alexdbrethe A45 is not at its limits. People have pushed them to 600+ with no issues. There’s plenty in the mid 10 second range with an upgraded turbo.
@@Alexdbrethat tuned car looked like it had maybe 20 more hp
Engine is stressed with all the boost to make 420 horsepower lol! I wouldn't want to own one out of warranty like a B58!@ginco_bnz
Gotta love the A45, cracking piece of kit
Good old 4.0tt in the e63? It was good old when it was actually over 6l in capacity 😎
Hey Matt I think you should do a bugdet hot hatch race like the suzuki swift sport, vw, ford, renault... etc.
Please made a race of 4 cylinders
C63SE vs A45S vs CLA45S
Rory's always positive and realistic 😊
2:15
As a C63s V8 owner and MB snob: "Accually that is E63 Bi-turbo V8, not Twinturbo V8. Totally different things!"🧐
Mind explaining ?
@sanskarmohanty9939 Well duh! It says so on the car😅
Not only that, they brought a 2017 car to this race. That is not the fastest e63s, they would’ve never brought the first version of an M5 F90 to these races. When it comes to Mercedes they really mess things up
@@CarlizWang ooh
@@sanskarmohanty9939 in earlier times biturbo meant 2 turbos of the same size, starting at the same rpm.
Twinturbo meant two turbos of different size, mostly a small one for faster throttle response working at lower revs and a large one for the upper revs.
(BMW even built a Triturbo 3L inline 6 Diesel at some point. The 535d and 335d they were called iirc And Mercedes experimented with 3 turbos on the V6 Turbodiesel for some time where they mixed the principle completely: 2 small turbos, one for each bank and one large one for both banks and higher revs and more boost. They ditched it for too much complexity and never put it in production i think.)
But at some point nobody cared to use the terms this way anymore and so today they are used interchangably mostly.
The A45 is my favorite lil car on this video! I was waiting for this! Also where is the white e63s estate you guys used in the last video?
I was gonna type that I wish the A45 was tuned to atleast 600hp to keep up with these too, but I waited for to see the results then Nick comes with a tuned A45 😆
Great vid as always 👍🏻
Who’s drunk??
Me
That 4th car came in close on 8:15 and it wasn't even trying!
Don't change the "www"( what will win) with "what will happen"....we want the "www" back!
I bet some one tried to "optimize" the ECU of the E63 and totally spoiled the settings. This happens often because with an ECU modification, not just one ECU, but also many inconspicuous ones have also to be adapted.
Not me still waiting for I30n and Golf 8 GTI drag race😭😭
If it’s the face lift i30n it should beat the GTi
8:17 the blue car in the background could hold up to the amgs! Pretty impressive
2 views in 18 seconds 😢
983 in 2 mins😭
5k in 5
😊
585 400 in 21 hrs😅
The damn 2.0 L just eats everything up. An M3 G80 with 3.0 L R6 cylinder and now a 4.0 L V8 cylinder. What's wrong with this beast. What a car!!
well, you need to do the Revs / Sound check a bit "different"
Switch to S+ or Race, go into "P" and pull the up or down shift on your steering wheel.
Try it, works for the C63 and A45
That A45S just moves~~ incredibly quick for a hatchback with just a 2.0L turbo 4 cylinder
What's interesting is that VAG EA888 motor is arguably the greatest modern tuner engine out there. In my 2015 MK7 Golf R, with just a simple downpipe and APR stage 2 ECU tune, I was reaching just under 11.7 in the 1/4, and 0-60 in 3.51.
They are putting down similar times, with just simple tunes and the A45s has about 130 more HP stock for stock.
My stage 1+ e85 2018 rs3 ran 10.77 quarter mile.
@@davothegreat9990 just a simple stage 1+ e85 and your mid-10s. Nuts! 👍
@Daveyboy_GolfR my mate is stage 2 e85 and he ran 10.5. Same year rs3 as me. 2018. Best car I've ever owned for sure so far.
Matt a good test for the new C63 would be taking a sporty roadtrip through Scotland without charging the car and seeing if you would be mostly driving the 4 cylinder engine.
All the people crying about the 4cyl 63 😂, Go drive one it's an incredible machine 💪
I would like to drive one
It may be fast but it’s completely soulless
A C63 AMG with a four cylinder? NO!
„I had a very exciting 3 seconds, and then you pulled away“
Hope that he only has this experience during races 😂😂
£100,000 for a 4 cylinder 💀
What about c63s vs s63e??? I'm really curious how it will do with the newer s-class
That would be a great race with the E63 wagon
He’s a little nervous @0:36 cause it not raining. Finally a day where it’s sunny and dry for a race.
12:02 if the car doesn‘t want to produce any pops, Matt has to them himself xD
AMG:
A45s - 2.0 R4 421hp 500nm AWD AMT 8 1550kg £63370
C63s e-performance - 2.0 R4 476hp, 1 Motor RWD 204hp, Power 680hp 1020nm AWD AT 9 2190kg £99750
E63s - 4.0 V8 612hp 850nm AWD AT 9 1990kg £90000
Now you understand what's is do or can do e turbo charger always beat any turbo more heavy vs others still beat them all. The fun is a45s beat v8 this shame.
That hybrid absolutely flys❤
Mat: I don't choose the fastest car!
also Mat: chooses the tuned hybrid with the highest figures and by far
476 hp from a 2.0L is nuts. If the 4.0L had that specific output, it would make 952 hp. Which is obvious, but puts into perspective how hard that 4 cylinder engine is working
From what I’ve heard it’s not a reliable engine at all
We absolutely need a rerace with a properly working E63. That would have been a very interesting race.
Matt: you want to sell… Skip⏩️skip⏩️skip⏩️
As always a great race and video👍
When you show the stats on screen you should also put up the power to weight ratio.
And you should put the C-class AMG up against the Tesla model 3 Performance.
That would be an interesting race for sure. +1 on the Power/weight ratio.
Those 2 A45 gave me an idea. Get the same car 3 times, do all the challenges and see which performes a bit better. Nearly all cars don't perform the same also when it's the same car. This would be interesting
My 2014 CLA 45 with AMG performance exhaust sounds insane compared to both of these 4 cylinder engines.
In che senso way quanti horse power you car?
@@stefanocerna6504 360
@stefanocerna6504 360hp
What did we learn? Its less about how many cylinders you've got but you should never own an amg for too long 💀
“I cannot believe this” says Matt. In the car he’s chosen to drive because he knows it’ll win
Drift the cars too before race. That was the best part dont forget to do that in next one mate.! 😊
Honestly between these 3 I'll choose the AMG
😂😂😂
A new era begins boys
That is so disappointing that the E63 wasn’t performing at it’s full capacity! I’ve had run-ins with A45s in my E63S wagon and it are them like nothing.
A 45s 421cv e 500nm for 1550kg Vs 63s 614cv 850nm 1990kg and a45s stage2 500cv 610nm 1550kg is similar for 400metri
Man I'm still mad Merc didn't name the C63 the 190E-Performance, to pay homage to the legend
Forget the new C63, A45s is my choice
E63s owner here, should run a 11.1 1/4 back to back to back like mine did before I tuned it, quicker than the new c63s… 11.5 with nearly 700hp 😂 shambles. what a shame for the E. Also I had a similar issue, my exhaust valve stuck closed on one side and it knew and lowered the boost and wouldn’t give power past 4k but showed zero fault codes and nothing on a diagnostic, I worked it out via sound. Fixed and zero issues for the last 2 years of ownership at stage 2 power runs a mid to low 10 @138mph things an animal
well if the e63s has issues like that, then this test is more than valid.
@@DutchOrbit e63 is not for stupid owner. The owner of black e63 is too stupid to know what’s wrong with his car
Wee need the rocket E63S of DMO Deejay 🎉🎉🎉🎉
chemtrails at 7:56
do a drag race between the Audi RS7-r ABT vs BMW M5 CS vs Mercedes brabus 900
Soft limiters are the stupidest thing ever added to cars. Absolutely stupid
E63 amg ❤❤❤❤.
I dont care how quick that C63 is
Mr Matt Watson,
why is it you can never let us know the boost that cars are producing
I would like to know how much the turbos are producing or superchargers
The C63s despite not getting much love, there’s no doubt about its performance though.
Tremendous difference in cars the new one stopped so quickly well done congratulations all 😊
Drone footage for future races and deffo for breaking would be insane, thoughts?