What's the difference between 1000 and 2200?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 ก.พ. 2024
- Post Game Discussion On The Cornered Chess Channel:
• 1000 ELO Chess Beginne...
My Opponent's Channel (Check it out!)
@CorneredChess
👉🏽 Say hello to 1500 ELO 📈
chessvibescourses.thinkific.c...
😎 Play Chess Here:
www.chess.com/membership?ref_...
👚 Merch: Chessvibes.shop
Links are affiliate links and help support the Chess Vibes channel via a commission.
Thanks for inviting me to play Nelson, I had great fun!
gg
I’m also 900 lol
lol
Pretty good thought process most of the time, apart from that g3 move, I like the game. This was at least 1300 performace Id say, good job.
Brave to play against Nelson publicly, and well done despite the loss
dude you are jacked
Two times he could move his knight, improving it by also capturing material.... And he didn't. It's strange that I am able to see other player's blunders, but not seeing mine! 😁
And the funny thing is they can see your blunders while not figuring theirs
@@darkdolphin8310 yesterday I did a 61 move game that ended up in repetition draw in my favor because I had thrown the game, when I did the review I saw I missed a move really early at like 17 i think, that I had a move to fork the queen and king and that would turn the entire game to me... Tunnel Vision is really a bad thing in this game xD
because its not your game so you are not hyper focus on the direct menace and can focus on the overall match instead
The same thing is true about life and relationships. It's difficult to see our blind spots
@@bofetada6841 correct. And in the same train of thought,we care more about judging others, than observing ourselves and being mindful and aware of how we choose to react in various circumstances.
Answer is 1200 elo
The difference is 1200 elo. Thank you.
All these collabs with those different personalities is so cool and wholesome, i really hope this stays a consistant part of his content for the future.
Yes, great format to watch both sides thinking and playing!
Thank you Nelson. I think you’ve invented a new format and it works. Listening to both players thinking through the moves makes it even more exiting then a speed run.m. Just great to watch. As far as I can tell you’ve changed the editing a bit so that your thought process doesn’t give away to much of the tension of the game, Because we are listening to your opponents first. Keep it up!
Indeed, I have never seen this format anywhere else. I really like Nelson's understated approach too. It will catch on and I bet Gotham picks it up.
I can really relate to the 900 odd level player as I have been there recently and as an 1100 or so I can see a few things I've learnt that make a difference.
For example considering when putting a piece in a position to trade, what am I going to be exchanging with and does it worsen my position? If so, don't invite that. It all stems from internalising Igor Smirnov's "To take is a mistake" dictum, at least for me.
I am quite impressed at his positional understanding however. He considers what his better pieces are. I think he needs to grind more puzzles and his opening knowledge could be improved?
Ofcourse this is good I agree ! Interesting rather than I having to just think on myself in 2 seconds .
I found this very valuable.
Keep this series up, we need more of these videos
Out of all the chess channels i have learned the most from yours. Your calm analysis of the positions and your willingness to say i don't know what comes next I'll just play principles of solid chess is inspirational. Thank you
Naroditsky is also very good
Key difference is Nelson thinks longer before deciding on a move but his moves does more than just attack or defend. He would position his pieces on good squares that would squeeze the 1000 rated player.
Not only that but Nelson develop all his pieces a lot faster and he doesn't play very bad move like g3....that was a super weak move that only a beginner would do.
So that was two rookie major mistakes.
He still played badly. "I don't like Nf6 becouse the bishop would pin me". Like wtf? Nf6 Bg5 dxe4 and black is winning? Not even calculating one move and rejecting Nf6 outright.
@@RandomGuyOnTH-cam601bro thinks he's better than a national master ☠️☠️☠️
@@colecube8251 I have 2200 FIDE rating bro
@@colecube8251 he might be I mean I'm a Im and im better than him
very instructuable
I really like these types of videos. Getting perspective from both sides of the board and at differing skill levels is very interesting and informative.
Thank you both, a very instructive tutorial and easy to follow. More please. You both have such a good way of presenting the options on the available moves. Most enjoyable.
I enjoyed this format! thanks guys
Keep this format going! I would also like to see the post game conversation between you and your opponent as you discuss the game review. Think it would be instructive to see how you both reflect on the key moments of the game.
Great game! Love this format. Hope you keep doing these vids for us
This was a really helpful video. Seeing the advanced vs intermediate perspective, seeing what each think about, and the habit to backseat drive like "no, no, you should be thinking about THIS!"...and then realizing I make those same mistakes...it's very informative in an entertaining package. You both taught me a lot today. Thank you.
This is very instructive for post-beginners. Thanks!
Dude, his board is much higher quality, Nelson please look into how he records the board, it is higher resolution.
Looks like he's playing on a Mac with a high-density display, judging by the font of the numbers on his screen
there's always a downside: it's chess, basically we need two colors to understand how the game goes😅
Love this series, keep it coming!
I really loved this type of videos! Wow AMAZING! more of these videos please!
I'll be now heading to the video where yall talk about this game.
Outstanding!! I thoroughly enjoyed watching this and seeing the thought process of both sides. Keep it up please.
Nelson is top-notch when it comes to chess tutorials.
U should see Eric Rosen...u will never see a calm and clear explanations better than his
Rosen is a better player but his tutorials aren’t as good as Nelson imo and this is coming from someone who’s a massive Rosen fan and has studied theory from his videos
love your videos nelson
Love this series. Haven't seen this concept on another chess canal. Subscribed.
highly educational series, love it
I love this series. Outstanding learning tool.
Very useful instructional format, and great content 😎
You're really straight forward that makes you different from gotham chess and etc.
This is awesome, very helpful insight
Hey cool series thanks for making these
This is a great video. Do more of these if you feel up to it Nelson! Especially for the people who are low elo :)
I had a lot new idea dur to this video , thx Nelson!
This is great. Please do more of this kind of games.
I Enjoyed That, I Would like to See More. Very Instructive to Follow along.
100% the most insightful chess video I've seen. I could watch these everyday!!
This is what I have been looking for!! Thanks guys!!
this is an absolutely fantastic way to teach chess!!!! great job nelson
This is by far the best chess channel on TH-cam. Thank you so much!!
What a great analysis video, better than other channels imo.
This type of videos are so informative.i really learn and enjoy from your calculations. Thank you very much 🙏🙏
Yes
Yes
Yes
Vry instructive game Sir.i want Hope u can upload more videos like this .Your fan from Philippines
Well, that was more informative than a class.... I learned more from that game than any. I thank both players for explaining what they are doing and being honest about it. Thank you both.
These collabs have been very cool!
This is a superb video, very good idea to do a two-sided. As a ver y dumb person it took 5 mins or so to get in the groove of following the back and forth but fascinating to see you both talk through what the other person's options are.
Just finished and it got even better. What an insight into the human perspective. At the 42-minute mark, the English dude is focused on the Bishop/Castle thing in the corner and the other guy doesn't even consider it part of the game. Very interesting stuff.
Love the concept !! And you look like Tom hardy. Great video. 🎉
Really enjoying these
Any link to the recap video ? Was really fun setup !! Wish there were more of these of different elos :)
Great Nelson!! Tyvm!
2:41 So far I've heard black musing 'I think c3 is a move but I can't remember the line' and black musing 'I don't remember the lines but I think c3 is a move let's play that'.
My take: 1000 or 2200, no difference, they don't really know their openings past the third move yet :)
But will grind u in the middle game and win easily
Very good content! Loved this. He did manage to feel out his own mistakes, but wasn't able to actually calculate it all. That's the difference in skill here, in a nutshell. Gotta work on those tactics!
I love this concept. No training video shows more the different ways of thinking 🎉 its rly varied 😁
Great idea and video. Lil suggestion - If there was another player that was even more advanced like 2500 reflecting over both your games, I think that would add a little more value to this.
Good video ! Well done
Total abandonment of the king mid game is an interesting tactic
thanks learned a lot also smart way to understand the game on the critical sec
yes! the series i was hoping for. :)
well done good format
Cool perspective from both sides
great video, and very instructive. and with analysis like this @CorneredChess will leave elo level 1000 way behind very soon
Great lesson
Very enjoyable presentation.
Please make a video explaining what are inaccuracies and how to avoid them.
Wow what a creative video! Never had this much fun learning haha
The early move of defending the knight with a pawn istead of using bishop to defend and devolop was a big issue. It blocked a developing sqaure for his other knight which became continual discussion.
Yo that was fun to watch, can we get more vids like that?
Great content
Very good concept
Great video hope it becomes s long series l.
great video, Nelson!
Great game, love these videos! Cornered Chess played very well overall. Really shows that it all comes down to just a few small decisions (that turn into mistakes). It's difficult to see them in the moment for us sub 2,000 players 😂. It's kinda like golf, if you're off just 2° or 3° at impact it makes a major difference down range. The 'Magnus Effect' - golfers hate it, chess players envy it.
I can't find the link to the game review. Anyone? Thanks.
Great videos , how about ame vs Alex banzea , Gotham, alessia or Anna cramling to see how the higher levels think against each other ?
He did get cornered in the end. So well named 😂
I love these videos
at the end is there Rf4 and bringing the h pawn for checkmate?
This was a great watch
Great video
The difference is nelsi is constantly thinking attack and how to develop while defending whereas 1000 elo is stuck on one threat moves at defending pieces by moving them without developing other pieces while simultaneously defending. Also not recognizing dangerous threats is a common mistake that many of us have. Ty for sharing
Also scared of tension. They only let pieces stare at each other for a few moves before getting the urge to trade them off for basically no reason. I am also 1000 so I see it all the time haha
Bro I was here when you had like 100k followers, been out for some time. Half mill? Congrats man
I love this series. It would be great to see you play against @ApexChesss
As someone who is rated around a thousand I saw exactly what I already knew from my own games. At the thousand rating mark you start to get good at planning your own moves, but it is still difficult to accurately predict your opponents. I think it's because the people I play against can seem erratic. At the 2k rating moves and ideas become more consistent. At lower ratings people do crazy moves and positions get out of hand fast.
Great format. When the rating difference is this big, perhaps you could be on the treadmill the whole time to even things out a little!
This was a great perspective thank you for recording this.
hello brother
Good stuff. I'm a bit surprised that Cornered didn't automatically assume he was doomed if he took the rook , otherwise I would happily accept playing Nelson so evenly for so deep into the match.
1:50 c3 with a need for queen controlling the centre
and 17:53 he miss the chance to develop the knight and attack the bishop when he developed fewer pieces
making him cannot find a good time to develop his knight
and the knight also blocking the rook behind
then leads to a strange g3 in front of a castled king because of too few pieces to defend
and at the end
he just give up to think and push his only developed bishop to capture a pawn far far away from the battlefield
@25:38 oooof! pawn g3 move is the most 990 elo thing that was ever done! no 2000 elo player or higher would decide to play g3!
Yeah I am 1800 and I was thinking to trade the bishops not the pawn push.
I'm 2200 and there is definitely merit to voluntarily open up the g file to slide your rook over
Not in that position with the bishop pair staring at you in the corner, the knight on g6 ready to jump in and both queen and rook lurking behind the lines. That’s a terrible time to be opening yourself up like that.
Great video, Nelson! I really hope you'll make a series based on this idea, it would be very useful. CorneredChess is a star!
It's funny, my ELO is 1235, but I can't boast of such a structured thinking as CorneredChess has. Maybe I play a little better, but my thoughts are a furious hurricane. It seems like I can learn something from a person who plays not better than me. Interesting!
Guys! Please continue! 🙏
How can I play you, Nelson in this format?
Your awesome nelson!!!
This is how chess need to be taught. Great game folks.
Where is the follow-up discussion? I see no link! Please add. Always.
Found it, cannot delete my posting - sorry
The moment your opponent played c3, the best attacking move by the fish is Qh5 since c3 is an opening mistake (however the most sneakiest is Qe7 because then you can take your opponent to a deep forest where 2+2=5).
CorneredChess could have gotten close to Nelson's level if he knew that moving f2, g2 or h2 is bad
For those whos wondering what the main differentes are: 1000 uses standard design, 2200 old design.
I am new to the game and I enjoy your program but I find it hard to focus when the b oard VIEW keeps changing sides.
How does one get into these videos? I assume they r students that paid for coaching
Cornered chess played well ! His issue was going after a rook while there was a lot of pressure on his king. And never developing his knight when there was a lot of good chances for it
His issues were.. 1. The pawn push threatening the bishop and creating a backwards pawn (which neither of them mentioned) 2. Not moving his knight despite having several obvious chances to move it to d2. 3. Weakening his kingside by pushing g2 instead of just moving his bishop back. All of those were clear errors.
What if your opponent sacrificed the dark squared bishop on h6 square and then exd5 and after your move they could get a good attack with queen h5 (i might be wrong but i think its a good sacrifice) at 15:24
Good format. For education, I think watching just your side is more useful. This is because watching your opponent's side does not really provide a lot of *new* insights when you are around the same elo level as them. But also including them in the video is entertaining though. So for entertainment, you could include your opponent's side as well. Not meant to hate on CorneredChess, just feedback on the format. Big shout out to him for participating :)
He pretty much got cornered.