I think that might be one of the most perfect summer dress/office watch of 2021, great look and specs. I think Omega just needs to discontinue 75% of their lines and leave watches like this.
You're so right, man. They have to trim down their collections down to a handful. Offer less and their product line would feel a lot smoother (and would probably gain a lot more attention at the same time) Thank you for the great comments as ever!
There's a lot to offer in this new arena (unpopular opinion but) I'm so glad that Omega took the Aqua Terra this way. Thanks a million for the comment Mohammed!
Those polished centerlinks need to go (unless you're talking about the 300 Professional) then yes, absolutely. Tank treads have seen their time ;) Thanks as always for the comment Levon!
Thanks for taking the time to do this release justice. So many others have glossed over this update as 'out of left field' or some how unwarranted. This watch wears small seconds as well as any wrist watch ever has. I appreciate your loyalty to good design. Keep up the good work.
Thank you for the great analysis. I’ve never given the Aqua Terra a second thought before, but now understand that it’s a real competitor for an Explorer or Datejust - the Omega really would be a terrific “one watch”
I reckon the arrowhead has its place on the minutes (at least for a dive watch) it's always been the Seamaster's jam by the time we reached the CK2913-5 generation (and yes, I'm a total nerd) - Agree with the centrelink polishing though... brushing always will stand the test longer. Thanks for the comment Roy!
I like the arrow head, it gives the watch character. Agree with the polished center link… I much prefer brushed bracelets. In this watch though I absolutely love the looks on its rubber strap.
If Omega would deliver Aqua Terra with fully brushed-links bracelet, it would look like Seiko or Orient price level. Design goal of Aqua Terra is that it looks luxury and sporty /daily banger of the watch, all at the same time. Yes, the polished center-links are too flashy, they get scratched really fast, but going all the other way has a major model reception downside.
Their world timers are gorgeous... real watchmaking from Omega. And as for the Rose / Navy blue dial on Navy rubber strap. In the metal it looks too good to be true! Ah, love the brand! Thanks as always Robert
It's so great where these models are going. And the best part of all is that they don't borrow ideas or designs from anyone else. Wholly unique in every category from movements onwards! Thank you for the comment Seçkin!
I really don’t know why they didn’t put lume all the way down the minute hand ? It makes it a lot harder to view with lume only on the arrow . I personally prefer the cleaner previous model , the outer dial is colour matched so it pushes all the way out . On the new model the outer dial is white , the small seconds dial is white and it’s broken up by the date window . The previous model everything fits perfectly and also the 38mm looks equally as good as the 41mm.
Just got my green dial AT a couple of months ago and I love it. If I had the choice now, I'd go for the small seconds. It pushes it a bit more towards the elegant, but it still remains super sporty. Love it!
Unpopular opinion that we like this style, hey? But then you and I are both drawn to the outliers often enough ;) Hope you're well sir and thank you for taking the time to watch the clip!
If only Omega would incorporate a tapered bracelet! I love the Aqua Terra and enjoy my green dial version, but for a watch this nice, there should be an equally elegant bracelet.
It's strange how their bracelet department doesn't get the same love the watch heads do. There are a few exceptions, but the majority just don't "fit" the watch, I know what you mean. Thank you for the comment Kurt!
@@oOoScarecrow31oOo It's not a fit issue for me. They're reasonably adjustable. It's the feel and aesthetics of a tapered bracelet, well engineered and visually integrated with the watch. Omega's bracelets are generic, average quality and an afterthought to the watch's design. This is one area where Rolex has them beat in my opinion.
Ive always loved the small seconds layout. Since most people only use the second hand intermittently, it makes sense as a smaller sub-dial. The great part about this offering is that it is still easy to locate and use at a glance. Seems well thought out. Simple yet surprisingly effective.
Even though I'm a sucker for small seconds and the date at 6, something feels off to me - mostly in the 38mm iteration (which I hoped I could love!), where everything is strangely rounded and seems not quite in balance with the traditionally sharper, muscular case design. Smells like a 90's watch trying to be retro. And we all know how often that worked out.
The 38's do look quite sparse I must admit. Maybe it's also the lack of text on the dial (ironically) that makes it look pretty empty. It would've been cool to see the 41mm size brought back down to the older 38 - 37 sizes as a "mid-size". Oof and if it's working on the 90's watch configuration...
At 4:17 on the right if that is not the silvery blue dial there is no such colourway with that same dial design if I'm not mistaken unless I'm colourblind👀👀
I had an Aqua Tera for a couple of years but I couldn't warm to it. There wasn't anything wrong with the watch per se, but I just never really looked forward to wearing it. In terms of this new iteration, mmm I'm not keen but then I think it's pushing it more onto the dress side than the sports.
Ah, always a pleasure Fayim. Love these segments discussing new releases and I plan to do more in the future. They really do keep me on my toes ;) Thank you for taking the time to watch the clip, brother
Love it 😍... Agree, really surprised there's not been much of a buzz online about it. The only "dress" watch I'd consider, really like it....may sway me from the seamaster I'm currently aiming for. Excellent video, thank you 👍🏻👍🏻
Ooooh difficult to choose between the Seamaster 300 and this (I'm guessing that's your choice) Both are very versatile. Something is telling me that as an everyday wearer these AT's might make a serious dent... BUT the new seamasters are stunning too especially in blue. Always a pleasure making these Steve and thank you for your comments!
I whole heartedly agree on what you think of this watch and the AT of the last decade in general. For me, it began with the introduction of the teak dials. They just grabbed my attention as I have a weakness for interesting dials. Then I began to notice all the other details (the applied logo, the hour markers, the hands, the case design…). It was all quite simple yet refined at the same time. I have recently acquired a two-one AT on a bracelet and they just have this sophistication that makes me only want to wear them with buttoned down shirts or polo shirts for some reason 😄 Perhaps an all steel AT would truly serve as the all round sporty/dress watch fit for the single watch collection. This center seconds version of the AT in my opinion marks the point where I find the design of the watch has “matured” so to speak. I still have some minor “if only” points, that are all color related in this instance, but they don’t take away anything from the overall “maturity” of the design.
The minute track of the small seconds on the 41s tone matching the chapter ring makes both pop and I'm unsure if I like the effect. Like the watch face scaled down and repeated. I want to enjoy it, time will tell.
Time will tell with all things ;) I agree, maybe the repetition of colours was too much and the watch would've looked better without the subdial outlined. There's one great model, white dial, white subdial but only the metal ring is black. Looks amazing in a few press photos but there wasn't anything substantial to use for the video (it would be the model I'd jump on given the chance)
Wonderful review mate! I am debating between the Aqua Terra small seconds in bracket and the Seamaster 300m in white dial. Love them both and having hard time to decide.
Personally something doesn't sit right with the watch for me, whether it is the date window breaking up the small seconds, or the small seconds jarring slightly with the more sporty than dressy feel. I've owned an Aqua Terra before, mega watch...though I think it was much better value for money in the past.
Isn't it strange seeing them side-by-side? There's such a void all of a sudden (surprising to me too) - also am a huge fan of a long seconds though... it's such a difficult balancing act. And thank you George! Keep waiting for an Olive dial interpretation of this and it'll be killer!
Just tried this model (Aqua Terra SS) on at the Omega AD. I'm absolutely blown away. They also told me this new variant hasn't been very popular to date. In their words, they need it to be seen on the wrist to increase interest.
I'm really hoping that they look again at the MOD model and plan a reissue of it next year. Otherwise they facelifted the piece a bit at the beginning of the year with a more of a retro direction
@@ID-Guy I see. I for one hope that they do technical update and minor change, namely power reserve extension and helium escape valve removal. Do you think they will do those things? Also, thanks for the great content.
Love how they've managed to make a modern interpretation that doesn't look old fashioned and has a great modern twist to it at the same time. Thank you as always for the comment Michael
A great video IDGuy. I have an 'older' Aquaterra from the mid 2010's I think. An asymmetric titanium case (crown has the blended crown guards) smooth white dial GMT with the date a 6. One of the main reasons for buying this apart from the aesthetic was to have something that could not be pigeon holed in either dress or sport but could hold it's own in either. Exactly what you mentioned. I completely agree with the point about having something on the dial to anchor it. I wouldn't say that the current AT is not anchored though as it has text between the date and the center but it's certainly not as anchored as it could be, maybe moving the Seamaster script from below Omega to above co-axial text may have done it better. The new model with the small seconds has certainly grabbed my attention and desire to add it to my watch 'Watch list'. Everything just works, it's simple but somehow adds an element of entertainment. I guess I like the small seconds complication as I have added two watches with this to my collection in the last year, both un-fussed but anchored, the Nomos Ludwig 36 and the Longines Heritage Tuxedo with the Heritage Sector dial lurking toward the top of my future purchases at some point. Generally I'm not a fan of the date complication, certainly on a small seconds piece but the execution on the AT is nigh on perfect, the trapezoid window at 6 within the outer ring of the small seconds dial. The blue pointed dial markers on the white dial and back to blue on the chapter ring are not only balanced, anchored but have an elegance as well. I look forward to seeing one in the flesh when they become more readily available at the AD. My wallet may not agree though.
IMO, the best of these are the ones with no numbers in the small seconds dial. The green one for example. No numbers in the small seconds dial, but with the date
I wonder how much cleaner the 41mm's would look without numerals on the sub dial too. Great point! Also like that the date is round on the 38mm Olive model (that would also have made a great difference with the bigger pieces) Thanks for the comment Jim!
Omega are going upwards in strides. I have a June 2020 Aqua Terra blue dial with the METAS 8900 twin barrel 60 hr PR caliber movement. For $3,500 pre-owned LNIB November 2020, nothing can beat it price point quality. This is a progression and adds to spaces in the original AT. Check out the GMT worldtimer - brilliant. Also the annual calendar. Excellent review as always.
Love their machines. I've grown more and more fond of my 57 Seamaster (due for a "one year later" video) They're just such gorgeous and unique designs that borrows nothing from anyone else. And as far as movements go, you really can't beat them for the price. Also dig the Worldtimer! How did they pull that piece off? Pity they're so pricey but still. Omega have always been Watchmakers while Rolex have always been Manufacturers, big difference ;)
@@ID-Guy the 57 Seamaster is one that should never leave your collection. It is very iconic and will always be. The Worldtimer is very pricey and that being a deterrent. will will see where Omega take themselves in the next couple of years.
I'm hoping now that omega have started to play with subdials on this movement they might produce a GMT Aquaterra without increasing the diameter. Do you think they'll be able to do it? I'd imagine it would be successful.
Nice review, it rocks and i appreciate the sharing of your thinking process. I agree with Abul below and many others who feel Omega needs to thin the herd...much harder to do than to critique tho.
Another stellar video! 👏 I’ve always wanted to love the AT, but something always holds me back. I’m not in love with the date placement on this one, but you almost make me willing to accept it. I’ve been the same with the Railmaster. Love the dial, not in love with the numerals. Oy, being a watchgeek isn’t easy 🙃👊
Good point about the historical "tribute" aspect of this new design, but I was and still am on the fence on these. Not a huge fan of small seconds dials personally, but the way these have those bold rings at their periphery attracts me to them. I think I do prefer the more subtle color SKUs like the white/silver with the blue hands and accents perhaps. I think it's a shame that the 38mm ones are clearly made for women. I don't even think I could call them unisex. Great take as always.
Great vid matey. YES ! Aqua Terra. I sold by Mk1 black 38mm, but would get a new one some day. Just a shame that the colours I am drawn to are not in 38mm (blue, black, silver etc). I also wonder how tall these are? Would be amazing if it was 10-11mm, but I am guessing it's more like 13.5mm, and no micro adjustable clasp?
I reckon they sit in the ballpark of about 12mm's think (if memory serves) BUT knowing you're on the path to one watch, don't deviate your course! ;) I'm so looking forward to the day you pull the trigger on the Exp. Hopefully there will be one nearby for me to review over the next few months (something tells me it'll be a knockout)
@@ID-Guy MUST NOT DEVIATE!!! damn you new watches. Stop tempting me.. thanks for keeping me on course dude. Explorer here we go... and I honestly can't wait to see your review... right..off to work. Chat soon
Those batons all look too darn symmetrical (always been my gripe with the AT line) I guess like the helium release crown on the professional seamaster, symmetry in this area is what they've always gone for with the AT's. Great point Henry and thanks for the comment!
This is a watch I’ve completely overlooked. I love the simplicity of the dial. I wish they made the small seconds in a black dial. This would look stunning on a NATO or RAF strap. Again, the field watch is the most versatile watch to wear.
@@IDKlineIt may not be a “Field Watch”. It does incorporate a field watch design. What does annoy me though is all watch makers put the company logo above the name. If they put the logo at the 12 position and drop the name would be outstanding. Over branding is so annoying.
@@IDKline I would go back further to the trench watches of WW1 for the start of the field watch line. The Rolex Explorer has numerals at the 12, 3, 6 and 9. The Citizen Promaster Tough doesn’t have numerals and I would qualify that as a field watch.
@@IDKline That is the beauty of a field watch is they are so versatile. Put it on a NATO or an RAF strap and it’s ready for a day of hiking. Put it on a leather strap and it’s ready for a night on the town. While the Aqua Tera may not be a 100% field watch, it does borrow a lot of field watch design hints. Would I be hesitant to wear an Aqua Tera on a hike or a week of hunting? Absolutely not.
The first Rolex Explorer didn’t have numerals and was much like the Aqua Tera in design and it made it to the top of Mt. Everest. The Aqua Tera has the same if not slightly better water resistance rating as most field watches. There’s no rule stating a tool watch can’t be elegant and they all have to look the same.
Always try to squeeze in a discount here and there - that's the beauty of these models ;) Better yet, snipe them on the grey market in a year or two! Thank you for the comment Akacia (spent many a time under your shade)
I'm sure there will be other variations soon, but if it was me I'd go "Tan" dial or just a standard black on white number. There something tells me there will be so many combos in this area soon! Keep your ear to the ground ;)
I think I would prefer that they moved the date back to the original 3 o'clock position for this model. I really don't like the date window breaking up the small seconds dial. Great video as always, thanks.
I’d prefer having a subtle small seconds without emphasis on the circumference, just a small hand hardly noticed sweeping, like in old style watches, helping a more balanced look, and yes, loosing the triangle on the minute hand too. All in all I love the aqua-terra and I love omega.
omega globemaster in white first choice , blue second choice . Incredibly underrated. Far more timeless in design language and will look great 50 years from now
The small seconds is also a design favoured by George Daniels. The master watch maker and inventer of the co axial escapement. I think this design is fitting given that the aqua Terra and the sea master range is now the main watches that brings his brilliant invention to the masses
Interesting. Just looked at the Omega site and it shows 284 versions of the AquaTerra range. For me personally, the 38mm versions with centre-seconds are more appealing. Even more so, I would like to see a "less is more" 38mm no-date version with a blue dial minus the seconds-numerals and a lower height/profile.
My personal prrference is either to have the sub second and loose thr date, or keep the date but loose the sub second, or loose the date and sub second altogether. This new combo makes the whole composition way too complicated with the date breaking the sub second, which I feel its a mistake.
Love the look, but would never buy it. Why does Omega still incist on 38mm being a ladies size?? The 38's design isnt near as thought through as the 41, and looks a bit cheap and kitschy. Give the midsize the same dials, and brush those centerlinks while they're at it. Then I'll consider it.
Made this point earlier that it would be great for them to bring this models size down to 37 - 38 like that classic AT's. Is it even worth calling them "midsize" anymore? Just bizarre how watch sizes have changed so much. Thanks for the comment brother!
I don't really understand why brands do this, their white and orange planet Ocean is my favourite but 43.5mm is too big, I can't understand why they can't just offer the same colour scheme on the 39mm variant.
George Ng-Bryson Hey George, Have you tried a 43.5mm PO on? I'm a puny 7" wrist guy and I wear a 43.5mm PO GMT... The L2L is only 49mm and that's the crucial dimension.
if they released a 38mm version of these with this year's green teak dial i'd buy it day one - be it with a small seconds hand or without. nobody knows why the current 38mm model is available in blue but not green, when 41mm comes in both colour ways.
The older one with vertical limes in Gold because gold itself is powerful where the SS models were too subtle. Now this current update works much better in SS or combination. However when it comes to Solid Gold model, I still prefer the older generation . Ofcourse it is just a personal preference.
I think what would really make this model great if they just had this one little extra complication.. something like a day/night window turning silver and blue depending on AM or PM. Just some tad extra to make it stand out of the rest of the competition. But maybe that's just me.
Not everyone can be Lange ;) Haha! But I get what you mean, brother. The main reason why this new AT spoke to me is because of that point of difference with the sub-dial. How often do we see three-hander sports watches today? It's quite an interesting move from them all things considered (I'm sure we'll some some gamechangers with the world time if they keep this formula up)
@@ID-Guy haha. my Nomos ahoi is undeniably a sports watch with 200 metre water resistance and it has a small seconds dial. And the Lange Odysseus has one as well of course ;-) Hence my thought: since they don't reinvent the wheel, give them the edge by adding just something the other small seconds sports watches don't have. ;-)
You're not the only one Sam! If you want me to go ultra-nerd: It came into being with the CK2913-5 and works very well for a dive watch especially when tracking minutes. Technically we should have more emphasis on the minutes when looking at a watch dial (for the sake of precision) but hey, pedantic design nerdery aside, it's all for aesthetics ;)
My attention has always been drawn to the idea of the Aqua Terra as my GADA daily, and I do like the addition of the small seconds, however i am still not sold. My opinion would be to brush it all out and let the dial be the focus / dress element. In today’s market - I think people want a primarily sport-oriented watch that can be dressed up, rather than a dress watch they can be dressed down and used for sports.
Nice video, but I'm not a fan of these new ATs. In general, I much prefer what Omega was putting out 10-15 yrs ago, designwise. Love the 2500 and 8500 ATs, and the sword hand SMPs and 2500 PO. I know they have advanced quite a lot with materials and features like better clasps, but many of the newer designs just don't do it for me. And they need to make the watches thinner.
The small seconds subdial on Aqua Terra was a daring move by Omega, and it has a dose of esthaetically pleasing aspect and fresheness. But on a ground level, small seconds do not fit the 13.2 mm thik, 41mm aquatic field watch. It looks like it is too much standing out, not belonging to the dial, and the original concept of the Aqua Terra line. In my opiniom, small second fit either the dress variants of watches or either chronographs. Last thing what could be added is vintage military watches which had small seconds subdialin order to save costs, since movements with a central seconds hand cost more to produce.
Agree that it It really is simultaneously a dive snd dress watch. It is Goldilocks.-sitting perfectly in the middle. For me, sub-seconds register does look far better on the white model, bit I’ve never purchased a white-dial watch and probably never will. I prefer the current, clean dial in the light or darker blue and because on those models (with the sub secons) it has entirely too much white around the sub second ring. For me, ruins the watch, but again, if I wanted a white dial watch it would be a tough decision.
@@ID-Guy I know, right! The heritage classic sector in black is so sexy especially in that BOR bracelet, now by Longines and not third parties! I do wish they could make one in gold with black gilt dial, or gilt dial on steel also just fine. And a salmon one with blued hands and gold caped bezel with steel case kind of like the ap remastered.
As a long-standing Omega fan, I must say that I am not impressed. Subdial is too in-your-face and spiky indexes seem overdone and squeezed in to the smaller dial. Just my opinion, and a bit of a knee jerk reaction to this first look (for me).
No problem at all John! You're not alone in this area either. I've actually had more unimpressed feedback for the most part and that's great. There's always room for improvement with these. Reckon the reason why it grabbed me so much is that we see three handed sports watches so often today that this point of difference made me look twice. I'd be very interested to know if this new format increases sales amongst watch buyers (not necessarily enthusiasts) But thank you for your comment, sir!
I think it spoils the layout of the dial that was just perfect after they moved the date to 6. This does remind me a lot of the original 30s Seamasters with small seconds as well but for me this is like a weird combination of vintage and modern and just does not work
And it's that exact reason why I love it haha! Thank you for this Damien, to say that the model is going to be a topic of debate is an understatement ;)
@@ID-Guy Haha that's very true! There are somethings that I can't stand on a watch - cyclops, date at 4, gold of any kind or two tone - that others love. Beauty really is in the eye of the beholder. Have you managed to see any of the new Seamaster 300's in person yet? Those for me are the perfect example of old and new but I will probably have to take a flight from Northern Ireland to have a look at one in the flesh
@@chasingpenelope So interesting because again, I agree with you looking at cyclopses etc. beauty really is so subjective! I'm hoping to get out to an Omega AD next month to see some of these releases in the flesh (including the new 300's) Even here I find the new 300's are leaning too much towards a "retro" look. Great banter ;)
First I love these individual videos over the live streams. But I understand how popular the live streams are and pay the bills so to speak. Now, I love the Aqua Terrera every time I see one or a review of One I ask myself why isn't one in my modest collection. But I have to disagree with you and say I find the small seconds clutter on a perfect dial. Just not necessary. But this is what make our community fun our opinions. Well if you did anything here it's to chase me back to the Omega site to look at the new combinations small seconds includied. I've always found the Sedna gold and steel with a blue dial on blue rubber strap a winner.
Thank you Robert. You're not the only one who's disagreed with me on this (in fact the majority aren't liking this new combination) My big rationale in the end after thinking about it more is that there's a point of difference seeing a sub-seconds instead of the typical 3 hand arrangement we see on every sports model out there today. There's been excellent feedback on this! Love how different our tastes are in this arena. And those Sedna gold models... If I had all the money in the world, I'd be the owner of a Rose Gold, Blue dial, blue rubber AT in a heartbeat... They're exceptional!
I must say I am not a big fan of the small seconds. I don’t dislike it in terms of beauty but, in my opinion, it takes away from the dressiness of the watch. I’d say, using your scale of comparison, it takes the aqua terra closer to, if not beyond, the Explorer. Its a bit too busy than what I prefer for a dress watch. I’d be split about using the new ones with a suit.
More than anything, it's the point of difference I like haha! Too often are we seeing three-handed sports watches and for some strange reason this breakaway feels very refreshing. I reckon that's it ;) Totally understand what you mean though. Thank you as always for your great comment Arthur!
It's strange but there's something about it that I like. The Anchoring point and use of the space feels more "considered" instead of having a void on the large dial. Maybe it is too cluttered for what it is though. Thank you for the comment Rezwan!
IDGuy Store: teespring.com/stores/the-idguy-store
Channel Support - Patreon: www.patreon.com/idguy
Latest Releases: th-cam.com/channels/zf6rqsEBni5G2TSevD6F4A.htmlfeatured
Follow me on Instagram: instagram.com/id.guy/
I think that might be one of the most perfect summer dress/office watch of 2021, great look and specs. I think Omega just needs to discontinue 75% of their lines and leave watches like this.
You're so right, man. They have to trim down their collections down to a handful. Offer less and their product line would feel a lot smoother (and would probably gain a lot more attention at the same time) Thank you for the great comments as ever!
@@ID-Guy Yes, as long as they do not go with JLC level of limiting collection :|
This watch never really was on my want list but now it is. Wow
There's a lot to offer in this new arena (unpopular opinion but) I'm so glad that Omega took the Aqua Terra this way. Thanks a million for the comment Mohammed!
The green 41mm AT is awesome (not the small seconds). One of my favorites in my collection.
Love the new design. Now they should redesign the Seamaster 300m bracelet. That Cream Colored Aqua Terra is Gorgeous. Need to see it on a bracelet.
Those polished centerlinks need to go (unless you're talking about the 300 Professional) then yes, absolutely. Tank treads have seen their time ;) Thanks as always for the comment Levon!
Stunning pieces …
Omega is doing a wonderful job
Thanks for taking the time to do this release justice. So many others have glossed over this update as 'out of left field' or some how unwarranted. This watch wears small seconds as well as any wrist watch ever has. I appreciate your loyalty to good design. Keep up the good work.
Thank you for the great analysis. I’ve never given the Aqua Terra a second thought before, but now understand that it’s a real competitor for an Explorer or Datejust - the Omega really would be a terrific “one watch”
I wish they would remove the arrow head from the minute hand and update the bracelet to get rid of the out of place (imo) large polished centre link.
I reckon the arrowhead has its place on the minutes (at least for a dive watch) it's always been the Seamaster's jam by the time we reached the CK2913-5 generation (and yes, I'm a total nerd) - Agree with the centrelink polishing though... brushing always will stand the test longer. Thanks for the comment Roy!
I agree about the arrow head.
I like the arrow head, it gives the watch character. Agree with the polished center link… I much prefer brushed bracelets. In this watch though I absolutely love the looks on its rubber strap.
If Omega would deliver Aqua Terra with fully brushed-links bracelet, it would look like Seiko or Orient price level. Design goal of Aqua Terra is that it looks luxury and sporty /daily banger of the watch, all at the same time. Yes, the polished center-links are too flashy, they get scratched really fast, but going all the other way has a major model reception downside.
Just get some scotch-brite and rub the bracelet back on Forth until you reach your desired effect
The world timer is so beautiful, I really like this new small seconds edition. I use a date every day too so no complaints from me. I love the Sedna
Their world timers are gorgeous... real watchmaking from Omega. And as for the Rose / Navy blue dial on Navy rubber strap. In the metal it looks too good to be true! Ah, love the brand! Thanks as always Robert
I have the World Timer on the Rubber strap. Completely awesome!
Perfect watch even got better in my eyes , definitely will get one!
It's so great where these models are going. And the best part of all is that they don't borrow ideas or designs from anyone else. Wholly unique in every category from movements onwards! Thank you for the comment Seçkin!
I really don’t know why they didn’t put lume all the way down the minute hand ? It makes it a lot harder to view with lume only on the arrow .
I personally prefer the cleaner previous model , the outer dial is colour matched so it pushes all the way out . On the new model the outer dial is white , the small seconds dial is white and it’s broken up by the date window . The previous model everything fits perfectly and also the 38mm looks equally as good as the 41mm.
Just got my green dial AT a couple of months ago and I love it. If I had the choice now, I'd go for the small seconds. It pushes it a bit more towards the elegant, but it still remains super sporty. Love it!
Great review @IDGuy. I am a fan. A great “tweener”, sporty yet elegant, works with a suit or with jeans. I applaud Omega.
Unpopular opinion that we like this style, hey? But then you and I are both drawn to the outliers often enough ;) Hope you're well sir and thank you for taking the time to watch the clip!
If only Omega would incorporate a tapered bracelet! I love the Aqua Terra and enjoy my green dial version, but for a watch this nice, there should be an equally elegant bracelet.
It's strange how their bracelet department doesn't get the same love the watch heads do. There are a few exceptions, but the majority just don't "fit" the watch, I know what you mean. Thank you for the comment Kurt!
Couldn’t agree more. The bracelet is certainly a weak point.
What about Aqua Terra micro-adjustment on the bracelet ?
@@oOoScarecrow31oOo It's not a fit issue for me. They're reasonably adjustable. It's the feel and aesthetics of a tapered bracelet, well engineered and visually integrated with the watch. Omega's bracelets are generic, average quality and an afterthought to the watch's design. This is one area where Rolex has them beat in my opinion.
Absolutely beautiful design. I can't ask more. Just keep the design, don't change it drastically Omega.
I’m with you! I think the small seconds looks good and especially so when you compare it side by side with the center seconds version.
It's that lil bit of X-factor that we all deserved ;) Thanks for the comment as always Nick!
Ive always loved the small seconds layout. Since most people only use the second hand intermittently, it makes sense as a smaller sub-dial. The great part about this offering is that it is still easy to locate and use at a glance. Seems well thought out. Simple yet surprisingly effective.
Even though I'm a sucker for small seconds and the date at 6, something feels off to me - mostly in the 38mm iteration (which I hoped I could love!), where everything is strangely rounded and seems not quite in balance with the traditionally sharper, muscular case design. Smells like a 90's watch trying to be retro. And we all know how often that worked out.
The 38's do look quite sparse I must admit. Maybe it's also the lack of text on the dial (ironically) that makes it look pretty empty. It would've been cool to see the 41mm size brought back down to the older 38 - 37 sizes as a "mid-size". Oof and if it's working on the 90's watch configuration...
Agreed. Great that they've done it and a love a small seconds but I prefer the long seconds in this case
Same. They should release a no date version
At 4:17 on the right if that is not the silvery blue dial there is no such colourway with that same dial design if I'm not mistaken unless I'm colourblind👀👀
I had an Aqua Tera for a couple of years but I couldn't warm to it. There wasn't anything wrong with the watch per se, but I just never really looked forward to wearing it. In terms of this new iteration, mmm I'm not keen but then I think it's pushing it more onto the dress side than the sports.
Excellent commentary as usual first class
Ah, always a pleasure Fayim. Love these segments discussing new releases and I plan to do more in the future. They really do keep me on my toes ;) Thank you for taking the time to watch the clip, brother
Love it 😍... Agree, really surprised there's not been much of a buzz online about it.
The only "dress" watch I'd consider, really like it....may sway me from the seamaster I'm currently aiming for.
Excellent video, thank you 👍🏻👍🏻
Ooooh difficult to choose between the Seamaster 300 and this (I'm guessing that's your choice) Both are very versatile. Something is telling me that as an everyday wearer these AT's might make a serious dent... BUT the new seamasters are stunning too especially in blue. Always a pleasure making these Steve and thank you for your comments!
Great watch, beautiful video I love OMEGA
It's great that they're always daring to bring new ideas forward. Easily one of my favourite brands to talk about ;) Thanks for the comment Miguel!
I whole heartedly agree on what you think of this watch and the AT of the last decade in general. For me, it began with the introduction of the teak dials. They just grabbed my attention as I have a weakness for interesting dials. Then I began to notice all the other details (the applied logo, the hour markers, the hands, the case design…). It was all quite simple yet refined at the same time.
I have recently acquired a two-one AT on a bracelet and they just have this sophistication that makes me only want to wear them with buttoned down shirts or polo shirts for some reason 😄 Perhaps an all steel AT would truly serve as the all round sporty/dress watch fit for the single watch collection.
This center seconds version of the AT in my opinion marks the point where I find the design of the watch has “matured” so to speak. I still have some minor “if only” points, that are all color related in this instance, but they don’t take away anything from the overall “maturity” of the design.
The minute track of the small seconds on the 41s tone matching the chapter ring makes both pop and I'm unsure if I like the effect. Like the watch face scaled down and repeated.
I want to enjoy it, time will tell.
Time will tell with all things ;) I agree, maybe the repetition of colours was too much and the watch would've looked better without the subdial outlined. There's one great model, white dial, white subdial but only the metal ring is black. Looks amazing in a few press photos but there wasn't anything substantial to use for the video (it would be the model I'd jump on given the chance)
Great review, nice addition to the range. I’m less convinced of the date window integration
You and many others it seems, sir! Great feedback! And I'll be replying to your message shortly ;)
Wonderful review mate! I am debating between the Aqua Terra small seconds in bracket and the Seamaster 300m in white dial. Love them both and having hard time to decide.
Personally something doesn't sit right with the watch for me, whether it is the date window breaking up the small seconds, or the small seconds jarring slightly with the more sporty than dressy feel. I've owned an Aqua Terra before, mega watch...though I think it was much better value for money in the past.
I like a long second hand.
I can see that the sundial adds to the beauty of the watch.
Feels complete.
The 3 hand seems to be missing something.
Isn't it strange seeing them side-by-side? There's such a void all of a sudden (surprising to me too) - also am a huge fan of a long seconds though... it's such a difficult balancing act. And thank you George! Keep waiting for an Olive dial interpretation of this and it'll be killer!
Just tried this model (Aqua Terra SS) on at the Omega AD. I'm absolutely blown away.
They also told me this new variant hasn't been very popular to date. In their words, they need it to be seen on the wrist to increase interest.
Is Omega planning to do something new with the Seamaster 300m too?
I'm really hoping that they look again at the MOD model and plan a reissue of it next year. Otherwise they facelifted the piece a bit at the beginning of the year with a more of a retro direction
@@ID-Guy I see. I for one hope that they do technical update and minor change, namely power reserve extension and helium escape valve removal. Do you think they will do those things? Also, thanks for the great content.
Maybe a mid sized version.
Excellent video as always IDGuy.
Thank you as ever, sir! So looking forward to Saturday's banter!!
The date kills it for me. A clean subdial no date version would be nice
Exactly my feeling as well
Anther great video 👏. This watch is growing on me, slowly, but some of the very best watches do just that. 🙏
The Vacheron honeymoon of yours will be long and passionate though! Congratulations again, Mark. I hope you're enjoying every second with it!
@@ID-Guy Thank you 🙏
Agreed it's a beautiful watch and yes it definitely sits nicely between a sporty and dress watch.
Love how they've managed to make a modern interpretation that doesn't look old fashioned and has a great modern twist to it at the same time. Thank you as always for the comment Michael
A great video IDGuy. I have an 'older' Aquaterra from the mid 2010's I think. An asymmetric titanium case (crown has the blended crown guards) smooth white dial GMT with the date a 6. One of the main reasons for buying this apart from the aesthetic was to have something that could not be pigeon holed in either dress or sport but could hold it's own in either. Exactly what you mentioned. I completely agree with the point about having something on the dial to anchor it. I wouldn't say that the current AT is not anchored though as it has text between the date and the center but it's certainly not as anchored as it could be, maybe moving the Seamaster script from below Omega to above co-axial text may have done it better.
The new model with the small seconds has certainly grabbed my attention and desire to add it to my watch 'Watch list'. Everything just works, it's simple but somehow adds an element of entertainment. I guess I like the small seconds complication as I have added two watches with this to my collection in the last year, both un-fussed but anchored, the Nomos Ludwig 36 and the Longines Heritage Tuxedo with the Heritage Sector dial lurking toward the top of my future purchases at some point. Generally I'm not a fan of the date complication, certainly on a small seconds piece but the execution on the AT is nigh on perfect, the trapezoid window at 6 within the outer ring of the small seconds dial. The blue pointed dial markers on the white dial and back to blue on the chapter ring are not only balanced, anchored but have an elegance as well. I look forward to seeing one in the flesh when they become more readily available at the AD. My wallet may not agree though.
IMO, the best of these are the ones with no numbers in the small seconds dial. The green one for example. No numbers in the small seconds dial, but with the date
I wonder how much cleaner the 41mm's would look without numerals on the sub dial too. Great point! Also like that the date is round on the 38mm Olive model (that would also have made a great difference with the bigger pieces) Thanks for the comment Jim!
Omega are going upwards in strides. I have a June 2020 Aqua Terra blue dial with the METAS 8900 twin barrel 60 hr PR caliber movement. For $3,500 pre-owned LNIB November 2020, nothing can beat it price point quality. This is a progression and adds to spaces in the original AT. Check out the GMT worldtimer - brilliant. Also the annual calendar. Excellent review as always.
Love their machines. I've grown more and more fond of my 57 Seamaster (due for a "one year later" video) They're just such gorgeous and unique designs that borrows nothing from anyone else. And as far as movements go, you really can't beat them for the price. Also dig the Worldtimer! How did they pull that piece off? Pity they're so pricey but still. Omega have always been Watchmakers while Rolex have always been Manufacturers, big difference ;)
@@ID-Guy the 57 Seamaster is one that should never leave your collection. It is very iconic and will always be. The Worldtimer is very pricey and that being a deterrent. will will see where Omega take themselves in the next couple of years.
ID SQUAAAD! Good job Omega!
Looks like you were first too, Samray! Thank you brother
Excellent video
It needed an update but I’m really struggling with the trapezoidal date window in the concentric small seconds 🤷🏻♂️ 🤔 - Great vid as always!
thats one brill watch... cheers
Always a pleasure Craig! A very interesting move forward to say the least
Omega consistently produces the most beautiful watches
Cover the Cross classic century pen. Would like to see your insights on the design.
I would like a no date version
It just hit me how few models in the Seamaster line are offered without dates. I reckon the whole range needs a bit of an overhaul ;) Thank you Brian
Best aquaterra I’ve seen
Is that omega 38mm , men watch ?
It's stunning. The subdial looks like a nautical instrument, or a speedometer from a classic car.
I'm hoping now that omega have started to play with subdials on this movement they might produce a GMT Aquaterra without increasing the diameter.
Do you think they'll be able to do it?
I'd imagine it would be successful.
Nice review, it rocks and i appreciate the sharing of your thinking process. I agree with Abul below and many others who feel Omega needs to thin the herd...much harder to do than to critique tho.
Another stellar video! 👏 I’ve always wanted to love the AT, but something always holds me back. I’m not in love with the date placement on this one, but you almost make me willing to accept it. I’ve been the same with the Railmaster. Love the dial, not in love with the numerals. Oy, being a watchgeek isn’t easy 🙃👊
Good point about the historical "tribute" aspect of this new design, but I was and still am on the fence on these. Not a huge fan of small seconds dials personally, but the way these have those bold rings at their periphery attracts me to them. I think I do prefer the more subtle color SKUs like the white/silver with the blue hands and accents perhaps. I think it's a shame that the 38mm ones are clearly made for women. I don't even think I could call them unisex. Great take as always.
Great vid matey. YES ! Aqua Terra. I sold by Mk1 black 38mm, but would get a new one some day. Just a shame that the colours I am drawn to are not in 38mm (blue, black, silver etc). I also wonder how tall these are? Would be amazing if it was 10-11mm, but I am guessing it's more like 13.5mm, and no micro adjustable clasp?
I reckon they sit in the ballpark of about 12mm's think (if memory serves) BUT knowing you're on the path to one watch, don't deviate your course! ;) I'm so looking forward to the day you pull the trigger on the Exp. Hopefully there will be one nearby for me to review over the next few months (something tells me it'll be a knockout)
@@ID-Guy MUST NOT DEVIATE!!! damn you new watches. Stop tempting me.. thanks for keeping me on course dude. Explorer here we go... and I honestly can't wait to see your review... right..off to work. Chat soon
Dear ID guy istiyorum would like to purchase omega seamaster 1948 . What do you think?
i have a while 38mm AT which i love. i wish they would put something different at the 12 oclock marker to orient
Those batons all look too darn symmetrical (always been my gripe with the AT line) I guess like the helium release crown on the professional seamaster, symmetry in this area is what they've always gone for with the AT's. Great point Henry and thanks for the comment!
This is a watch I’ve completely overlooked. I love the simplicity of the dial.
I wish they made the small seconds in a black dial. This would look stunning on a NATO or RAF strap.
Again, the field watch is the most versatile watch to wear.
@@IDKlineIt may not be a “Field Watch”. It does incorporate a field watch design.
What does annoy me though is all watch makers put the company logo above the name. If they put the logo at the 12 position and drop the name would be outstanding. Over branding is so annoying.
@@IDKline How is this not a field watch? It does have Water and land in its name.
@@IDKline I would go back further to the trench watches of WW1 for the start of the field watch line.
The Rolex Explorer has numerals at the 12, 3, 6 and 9. The Citizen Promaster Tough doesn’t have numerals and I would qualify that as a field watch.
@@IDKline That is the beauty of a field watch is they are so versatile. Put it on a NATO or an RAF strap and it’s ready for a day of hiking. Put it on a leather strap and it’s ready for a night on the town.
While the Aqua Tera may not be a 100% field watch, it does borrow a lot of field watch design hints. Would I be hesitant to wear an Aqua Tera on a hike or a week of hunting? Absolutely not.
The first Rolex Explorer didn’t have numerals and was much like the Aqua Tera in design and it made it to the top of Mt. Everest.
The Aqua Tera has the same if not slightly better water resistance rating as most field watches. There’s no rule stating a tool watch can’t be elegant and they all have to look the same.
I love it, reminds me of the tudor glamour double date. Pricewise though I think the glamour is a better buy for this style.
Always try to squeeze in a discount here and there - that's the beauty of these models ;) Better yet, snipe them on the grey market in a year or two! Thank you for the comment Akacia (spent many a time under your shade)
Are they going to bring back a Ranchero design ? 😱🤩
A Railmaster and small second design...
Man! What now. I wanted the white face with orange second hand. This looks more interesting though. I actually makes the face more balanced
I'm sure there will be other variations soon, but if it was me I'd go "Tan" dial or just a standard black on white number. There something tells me there will be so many combos in this area soon! Keep your ear to the ground ;)
I think I would prefer that they moved the date back to the original 3 o'clock position for this model. I really don't like the date window breaking up the small seconds dial. Great video as always, thanks.
I’d prefer having a subtle small seconds without emphasis on the circumference, just a small hand hardly noticed sweeping, like in old style watches, helping a more balanced look, and yes, loosing the triangle on the minute hand too.
All in all I love the aqua-terra and I love omega.
omega globemaster in white first choice , blue second choice . Incredibly underrated. Far more timeless in design language and will look great 50 years from now
The small seconds is also a design favoured by George Daniels. The master watch maker and inventer of the co axial escapement. I think this design is fitting given that the aqua Terra and the sea master range is now the main watches that brings his brilliant invention to the masses
Interesting. Just looked at the Omega site and it shows 284 versions of the AquaTerra range. For me personally, the 38mm versions with centre-seconds are more appealing. Even more so, I would like to see a "less is more" 38mm no-date version with a blue dial minus the seconds-numerals and a lower height/profile.
My personal prrference is either to have the sub second and loose thr date, or keep the date but loose the sub second, or loose the date and sub second altogether. This new combo makes the whole composition way too complicated with the date breaking the sub second, which I feel its a mistake.
This Aqua Terra looks great but I prefer the standard version, not small seconds.
I'd like to see one of these in a ceramic case.
Love the look, but would never buy it.
Why does Omega still incist on 38mm being a ladies size?? The 38's design isnt near as thought through as the 41, and looks a bit cheap and kitschy.
Give the midsize the same dials, and brush those centerlinks while they're at it.
Then I'll consider it.
Made this point earlier that it would be great for them to bring this models size down to 37 - 38 like that classic AT's. Is it even worth calling them "midsize" anymore? Just bizarre how watch sizes have changed so much. Thanks for the comment brother!
@@ID-Guy Sitting here with my 36mm SMP with sword hands, feeling old.
I don't really understand why brands do this, their white and orange planet Ocean is my favourite but 43.5mm is too big, I can't understand why they can't just offer the same colour scheme on the 39mm variant.
George Ng-Bryson Hey George, Have you tried a 43.5mm PO on? I'm a puny 7" wrist guy and I wear a 43.5mm PO GMT... The L2L is only 49mm and that's the crucial dimension.
The new one looks much better
if they released a 38mm version of these with this year's green teak dial i'd buy it day one - be it with a small seconds hand or without. nobody knows why the current 38mm model is available in blue but not green, when 41mm comes in both colour ways.
Soz if I missed it but £ how much pls
It looks like the 41mm AT will run you £5,350 at retail (by the looks of things they'll only be launched in August though)
@@ID-Guy thanks can I ask for some assistance from the community with a vintage Omega with a great back story pls
The older one with vertical limes in Gold because gold itself is powerful where the SS models were too subtle.
Now this current update works much better in SS or combination.
However when it comes to Solid Gold model, I still prefer the older generation .
Ofcourse it is just a personal preference.
I think what would really make this model great if they just had this one little extra complication.. something like a day/night window turning silver and blue depending on AM or PM. Just some tad extra to make it stand out of the rest of the competition. But maybe that's just me.
Not everyone can be Lange ;) Haha! But I get what you mean, brother. The main reason why this new AT spoke to me is because of that point of difference with the sub-dial. How often do we see three-hander sports watches today? It's quite an interesting move from them all things considered (I'm sure we'll some some gamechangers with the world time if they keep this formula up)
@@ID-Guy haha. my Nomos ahoi is undeniably a sports watch with 200 metre water resistance and it has a small seconds dial. And the Lange Odysseus has one as well of course ;-)
Hence my thought: since they don't reinvent the wheel, give them the edge by adding just something the other small seconds sports watches don't have. ;-)
I cant get over the huge pointy minute hand....I'd likely be an owner but for that...I'll maybe get over it one of these days
You're not the only one Sam! If you want me to go ultra-nerd: It came into being with the CK2913-5 and works very well for a dive watch especially when tracking minutes. Technically we should have more emphasis on the minutes when looking at a watch dial (for the sake of precision) but hey, pedantic design nerdery aside, it's all for aesthetics ;)
@@ID-Guy Ive got the same issue with the Glashutte diver...I struggle to enjoy it as all i can see is that huge pointy minute hand...
Not only that, but
I could see the 2005 Railmaster as becoming Omega's 1016
I see another video idea coming on! Time for a bit of redesigning here and there ;)
I wish I didn’t have the numbers around the minute track. I prefer the look of the railmaster.
Now imagine Omega making them in black/rose gold and green/rosegold and also offer it in 38mm. Id buy both!
My attention has always been drawn to the idea of the Aqua Terra as my GADA daily, and I do like the addition of the small seconds, however i am still not sold. My opinion would be to brush it all out and let the dial be the focus / dress element. In today’s market - I think people want a primarily sport-oriented watch that can be dressed up, rather than a dress watch they can be dressed down and used for sports.
Oh dear, I better start saving!
Wait until they bring this newest model out in Olive in a few months ;)
As long as it had quick adjustment.
Sadly (don't know why) but the AT's don't have a micro adjust feature on them still...
Nice video, but I'm not a fan of these new ATs. In general, I much prefer what Omega was putting out 10-15 yrs ago, designwise. Love the 2500 and 8500 ATs, and the sword hand SMPs and 2500 PO. I know they have advanced quite a lot with materials and features like better clasps, but many of the newer designs just don't do it for me. And they need to make the watches thinner.
So stylish.
The small seconds subdial on Aqua Terra was a daring move by Omega, and it has a dose of esthaetically pleasing aspect and fresheness. But on a ground level, small seconds do not fit the 13.2 mm thik, 41mm aquatic field watch. It looks like it is too much standing out, not belonging to the dial, and the original concept of the Aqua Terra line. In my opiniom, small second fit either the dress variants of watches or either chronographs. Last thing what could be added is vintage military watches which had small seconds subdialin order to save costs, since movements with a central seconds hand cost more to produce.
Agree that it It really is simultaneously a dive snd dress watch. It is Goldilocks.-sitting perfectly in the middle.
For me, sub-seconds register does look far better on the white model, bit I’ve never purchased a white-dial watch and probably never will.
I prefer the current, clean dial in the light or darker blue and because on those models (with the sub secons) it has entirely too much white around the sub second ring.
For me, ruins the watch, but again, if I wanted a white dial watch it would be a tough decision.
I’ve not looked on the website yet, but a green one on SS bracelet, hum. Kind of that Rolex flat OP green, not sunburst.
Ain't no one gonna talk about the latest Longines sector in black? Really??!
The Classic is on my list, I promise!! Damn sexy looking model. I'll get to recording a video tonight or tomorrow ;)
@@ID-Guy I know, right! The heritage classic sector in black is so sexy especially in that BOR bracelet, now by Longines and not third parties! I do wish they could make one in gold with black gilt dial, or gilt dial on steel also just fine. And a salmon one with blued hands and gold caped bezel with steel case kind of like the ap remastered.
As a long-standing Omega fan, I must say that I am not impressed.
Subdial is too in-your-face and spiky indexes seem overdone and squeezed in to the smaller dial.
Just my opinion, and a bit of a knee jerk reaction to this first look (for me).
No problem at all John! You're not alone in this area either. I've actually had more unimpressed feedback for the most part and that's great. There's always room for improvement with these. Reckon the reason why it grabbed me so much is that we see three handed sports watches so often today that this point of difference made me look twice. I'd be very interested to know if this new format increases sales amongst watch buyers (not necessarily enthusiasts) But thank you for your comment, sir!
I personally love it, can be dressed up or down with an added adventurous/sporty look, the original one was too plain imo this gives it a bit of pop
Now Omega just needs to update the smaller 39mm version.
I think it spoils the layout of the dial that was just perfect after they moved the date to 6. This does remind me a lot of the original 30s Seamasters with small seconds as well but for me this is like a weird combination of vintage and modern and just does not work
And it's that exact reason why I love it haha! Thank you for this Damien, to say that the model is going to be a topic of debate is an understatement ;)
@@ID-Guy Haha that's very true! There are somethings that I can't stand on a watch - cyclops, date at 4, gold of any kind or two tone - that others love. Beauty really is in the eye of the beholder. Have you managed to see any of the new Seamaster 300's in person yet? Those for me are the perfect example of old and new but I will probably have to take a flight from Northern Ireland to have a look at one in the flesh
@@chasingpenelope So interesting because again, I agree with you looking at cyclopses etc. beauty really is so subjective! I'm hoping to get out to an Omega AD next month to see some of these releases in the flesh (including the new 300's) Even here I find the new 300's are leaning too much towards a "retro" look. Great banter ;)
I'm surprised so many native speakers use "segway" instead of the correct "seque". Segway is a brand of scooters.
I just wish they'd properly lume the minute hand - it really gets lost among the indices. It's perfect, otherwise!
First I love these individual videos over the live streams. But I understand how popular the live streams are and pay the bills so to speak.
Now, I love the Aqua Terrera every time I see one or a review of One I ask myself why isn't one in my modest collection. But I have to disagree with you and say I find the small seconds clutter on a perfect dial. Just not necessary. But this is what make our community fun our opinions.
Well if you did anything here it's to chase me back to the Omega site to look at the new combinations small seconds includied. I've always found the Sedna gold and steel with a blue dial on blue rubber strap a winner.
Thank you Robert. You're not the only one who's disagreed with me on this (in fact the majority aren't liking this new combination) My big rationale in the end after thinking about it more is that there's a point of difference seeing a sub-seconds instead of the typical 3 hand arrangement we see on every sports model out there today. There's been excellent feedback on this! Love how different our tastes are in this arena. And those Sedna gold models... If I had all the money in the world, I'd be the owner of a Rose Gold, Blue dial, blue rubber AT in a heartbeat... They're exceptional!
I must say I am not a big fan of the small seconds. I don’t dislike it in terms of beauty but, in my opinion, it takes away from the dressiness of the watch. I’d say, using your scale of comparison, it takes the aqua terra closer to, if not beyond, the Explorer. Its a bit too busy than what I prefer for a dress watch. I’d be split about using the new ones with a suit.
More than anything, it's the point of difference I like haha! Too often are we seeing three-handed sports watches and for some strange reason this breakaway feels very refreshing. I reckon that's it ;) Totally understand what you mean though. Thank you as always for your great comment Arthur!
I think it's just over the top with too much going on with the dial.
It's strange but there's something about it that I like. The Anchoring point and use of the space feels more "considered" instead of having a void on the large dial. Maybe it is too cluttered for what it is though. Thank you for the comment Rezwan!
@@ID-Guy Yes I agree with the anchoring point. It could be one of those things that we never realised it needed!
Just got one... orange second hand...
You’re the only one who gets that AQ sits between the Explorer and DJ. Everyone else just whines about the polished center links.
Center Second looks better than sub seconds to me. Some of the color schemes are nice though.
Now if only it did not have a date...
At least they left it at the "Six" but even still, some of us love dateless. Thanks for the comment Alex!
@@ID-Guy I have a special place in my heart for the AT, and when they make a no date model w small seconds, I'm on it!
Interesting video, but not a single shot of the seconds hand actually MOVING. This whole video is just still images.