2022: Caution Notice, 2023: Warning Notice, 2024: Letter Before Action | NOC V3 Is Coming 💥
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 ก.พ. 2024
- Get our FREE Peace Keepers and Court Auditor courses here at peacekeepers.org.uk/
FREE Council Tax dispute challenge download here noc.peacekeepers.org.uk/
"Peace Keepers have been created to help secure a just and equitable existence., coming together to defend the peoples peace, to restore and preserve our inalienable rights, the highest standing in truth to be sovereign."
Nothing can be done to the prejudice of the people.
(Bill of Rights 1688)
Law is the people’s birth right.
(Act of Settlement 1700)
All are equal under the law.
No one is above the law.
Ignorance of the law is no excuse.
No one can knowingly impose their will upon any other without freewill.
Everybody has lawful excuse to the right of self defence.
---------------------------------
Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976
Allowance is made for "fair use" purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research.
-----------------------------------------------------------
www.commonlii.org/uk/cases/Eng...
A case just been won in Canada saying it was unlawful on lockdowns
Spain did this in 21 and said all fines to be paid bk don't know if everyone received their money but my neighbour was find but it was struck off bc he argued his case
Unfortunately separation of power no longer exists, we have lawfare waged against by a captured judiciary.
trying to reason with the courts ... its like going up to a local drug dealer and arguing that he must stop dealing cos it's wrong
@@anti-stupid-not--vax9629 i want to know how to remove myself from electoral register and also what's this bs i hear about removing a property from a land registry and why the hell would any1 want to do that? isn't it like burning receipts?
Excellent work Gents. 👊
Excellent work as always 👏🏼
I'm currently in a year long battle where multiple British Rights, and International Rights have been abused.
I'll tell you all about it in spring, when you go to Normans'.
Can you get full information on the Trial of the Seven Bishops?
I have a lovely excerpt that shows, Charles has renounced to be a king as he swore to be at his coronation, and has abandoned all claims over us.
That goes for his treasonous government also.
He's overseer for the pope
@@NoOne-hq9cp It is only what he says and does in public that matters - his private affairs like your and mine are exactly that - private!!! So dont waste your energy worrying about that :)
I’d love to hear more about this!
some councils are now trying to impose additional subscription charges for waste collection services and even offering a 20% discount for early adopters.. isn't that nice of them
💚✌️thank you both
Fantastic work ,thanks.
Ive used the fact that you can personally go after a person at court whether they work for the DWP or its outsource ptnr, police officers if any of these persons cause harm in anyway due to their actions whilst representing an organisation i tell them if dont believe me have an indepth convo with your legal dept & if any good then they will say you are, as such they gave way on what i was dealing with these organisations for!
Comments for the algorithm.
Keep on truthing.
For anyone losing their home due to council tax debt this would be gold.
im downloading this video.. its free legal advice
i always knew solicitors and barristers were a group of pot pissers without even a penny's worth of sense to throw in
Haven't paid council tax properly for years, and owe them thousands.. Not once have they mentioned a risk to losing my home due to non payments to council. Only did when I got behind on rent years ago
What evidence do you have for your claim.
I also have not paid council tax in years.
Stop the fear monitoring
@@rachelb8863 what happens when they try to get u to pay?
Boooooooooom 😍 Love it brother lol
consent of the majority.
Breach a statute as an individual and no mount of 'no consenting' will stop them putting you in jail, fine and court costs, and behaviour orders once you come out of jail.
Why his there two documents, the declaration of rights and the bill of rights?
The guy speaking says he doesn't like jury's because they don't give account of their findings.
I find this a very strange thing to say for a justice seeker.
Jury's do not base their findings of laws, but on what is right apposed to what is wrong.
If someone has infringed upon the law for a good reason or if the law is not flexible enough to deal with the case, then the jury can override the law to give justice.
The record shows that judges are far more likely to convict than a jury.
It has been know that judges have called for a retrial if the jury doesn't come up with the verdict they wanted.
Declaration was a negotiating document whereas BOR is final expressed agreement
@@marchorn466 You just made that up you cheeky monkey. Have you seen the two documents. Who evoked the declaration.
Was it parliament or a convention of the people. And who evoked the bill of rights, was it the parliament or the people?.
Golden info.
The 1832 representation of peoples act opens up the franchise it’s commonly referred to as the reform act. The franchise is opened up further in 1867
Giving the legal name which belongs to the Crown via Birth Certificate is giving consent and why they ask for your name
How does the Crown own your name?
"We value evidence and need your input to validate your claim. Can you answer a few questions to help us understand better?"
1. What led you to this belief?
2. Where can you point me to be able to validate this information?
We look forward to your answers.
@@PeaceKeepersOfficialChannel I to look forward to the answers😮, I think most of us went through this stage.
is this also why they think they can conscript us?
@@PeaceKeepersOfficialChannel annavonreitz.com/babyslavetrade.pdf you might find this interesting
Marc / Brian where’s the link for PDF file please
www.commonlii.org/uk/cases/EngR/1738/87.pdf
@@PeaceKeepersOfficialChannel thank you for link sent, that differs from the one you show in video.
@jeffbarrett1787 that's Marc's personal analysis on the video. He may upload to the PK website at some point.
@@PeaceKeepersOfficialChannel I thought as much, written in plain English for people like me to understand. thank you
FANTASTIC INFO…
Marc / Brian, with all your efforts and this video for me it’s confirmed what I believed many many years ago consent is needed especially in lower courts , as it was in my younger days. Thank you both, for everything.
@@anti-stupid-not--vax9629 I have only voted once in my 76 years and that was leave eu, in fact many times the council have come knocking telling me I have to register for voting or I could be taken to court. But never was
Well done.
brilliant
Keep referring people here ❤
interesting...
If you break all the words down to definitions, it will make sense.
i need to suit the council
Great info. Will dig into this more regarding my issue with TRL and CDER.
Have you contacted TRL or CEDR?
The latter spent months chasing me over a motoring issue. I think they may have had a Covid charge too.
They sent a letter claiming that they had an arrest warrant. But I did some research, and although the woman I spoke to (without giving my details) said they don’t put people in handcuffs, but would take them to appear in court. I essentially discovered that they obviously have no powers of arrest. So, because they were making unlawful threats and claims to possess powers that they don’t have, I just ignored them. Eventually they gave up.
Not sure who TRL are.
Peace
The assertion that damages awarded in Leighton v. Bristow and Sutor was a common law remedy is erroneous.
have you considered uploading a commentary of your experience on this platform as a direct party in the case to explain this?
Wasn't your damages awarded for common law breaches because the EA didn't have an obvious and verifiable authority to act? Statute was cited but ultimately, the EA acted unlawfully and thus a common law tort was committed.
@@tcrookes2803 no damages were awarded under Schedule 12, it has nothing to do with a common law remedy, the High Court explicitly said where the remedy was at paragraph 12 of the judgment
I understand that but why do you think that remedy is there? Don't you think that common law tort of harm was purposefully codified in the statute? @@wayneleighton7458
And because the EA were acted for government, the Ashby case was the foundation of the common law principle you're entitled to damages if the government breaches your peace.
Cornwall Council have made me bankrupt apparently, and have appointed a trustee, want me to make iva ,there is no easy access to my property,is there any peace keepers willing to take them on? Keep going learning so much.Thankyou.
PLEASE GUYS can you or someone point me to our rights of The right to " air "water " and "shelter ". particularly shelter. . Where is this written.. I saw it in a video of yours that came on my feed but for the life of me I cannot find that now..
Individual man or person
Excellent video. 1 question though. Can we in Scotland apply this as it says "the common law of England"?
14:40 to 14.50 = blackbeltbarry 😂
is this aplicable in Scotland too please? and if so can you point me in the directions of anyone else to share the journey with. Thanks this was very interesting and informative
As this is from the highest court which Scotland ceded to in 1706 - yes :)
So is this case law ?
Its clearly down to Cognitive dissonance, look for legal name on wikipedia you will see it in plain sight: A legal name is the name that identifies a person for legal, administrative and other official purposes. A person's legal birth name generally is the name of the person that was given for the purpose of registration of the birth and which then appears on a birth certificate
Wikipedia!!!! You class that as a credible legal source! And 'generally'? Will any of that hold any weight in legal proceedings?
This does not back up your claim "Giving the legal name which belongs to the Crown via Birth Certificate is giving consent and why they ask for your name". Please try again to answer the aforementioned questions. This is not evidence of a legal name belonging to the Crown via a birth certificate etc... We do not accept this as any form of evidence.
The sources in the footnotes will hold as authorative evidence though@@tcrookes2803
The Birth Certificate issue is a red herring - `Idem sonans` is a legal doctrine whereby a person's identity is presumed known despite the misspelling of his or her name, if the misspelled name sounds the same when pronounced @PeaceKeepersOfficialChannel
Simple example; Marc and Mark sound the same despite being spelled differently. So when you answer to a name that sounds the same as yours, yet it has been spelled in all caps or misspelled (deliberately), you give the court jurisdiction.
Thus a maxim of law applies "The presence of the body cures the error in the name; the truth of the name cures an error in the description."
I am totally aware of what 'Idem Sonans' is and how it can be a problem, but the Birth Certificate or rather the 'entity or character' it certifies as being in corporate existence, (not actual existence or reality), and it is that entity or character that the Courts have automatic jurisdiction over, hence why the appearance of 'the Body' cures the error, one has to rebut the presumption of appearance in that character or capacity, which is unfortunately easier said than done, because their is a organised resistance within the Judiciary against you or i being able to pull the jurisdictional carpet from under the their feet ...but it still does not negate the principal issue both in fact and in law that appearance is 'qualified' and requires volition, my assumption of your capacity and status may be incorrect but if you will agree to that assumption by assent in some form, their can then be no revocation of that act (within the same proceeding), in other words if you appear to be, you will be treated as though you are, i am saying no i do not recognise that appearance, how do you arrive at the belief or conclusion i am one and the same as that character? by your agreement ultimately, be it by way of words or action.@@Non-corpus-juris
Does Spain come under common law.. I ask because if you pay let's say a parking ticket within two weeks it's half of the fine. This is remedy... common law right?