What I love about this guy is his low notes sound like a totally natural part of his range, unlike a lot of basses who almost sound like they have two different voices, one for low notes and one for normal singing. Also that Eb1 is monstrous!
Any idea when John Ame's birthday is? All I could find was January 1st, and I don't know the year but they don't really have anything on him. He's another rarity!
@@manwithmonstervoice1100 Ames can do that as well, they sound about the same weight, I meant Ames is now deeper than 48 year old zlatopolski due to his age bein at least 10 years older than him at the time, Zlatopolski probably could have hit a Full Chest C1 at his final years in his early 70's, then he could do A0 chest fry, I've heard people claim that. His voice was of absolute richness and quality, the only bass I know can compete with is John Ames, Guiness only accepted Zlatopolski's Eb1 as his lowest chest, prob around 50, I say his D1 was okay. But C#1 and C1 were chest fries, at the time the quality of recordings were not that good to identify fry, aldo his upper register was powerful enough at E4, F4 was his highest. But prob in later years an E4 would be impossible. He had the lowest register. At the the youngest age between basses. Ames can do that, though Zlatopolski sounded fuller, if not necessarily heavier, he was bulkier, and prob more testosterone cycled his blood so the voice was more developed, albeit the same range.
facebook.com/groups/304921782912521/permalink/1739095829495102/ The link might not work since it’s on a private Facebook group called “Octavism, Basstronomy, and Choral”, so you might have to join the group to get access to it.
I would say they are about equal, but John Ames has a bit more power and resonance while also being able to lighten up his timbre in the 2nd octave to not sound so operatic... such as during his cover of "16 Tons". John Ames is definitely the most versatile basso profundo, in my opinion... without question.
@@johndeeregreen4592 The power and resonance make him a deeper profundo than Glenn Miller, In terms of lighten timbre, the speaking voice of Glenn is far lighter than his singing voice.
Thank you, Matteo!
You’re welcome!
"I feel so pretty" had me laughing 😅 Excellent work!
Thank you!
What I love about this guy is his low notes sound like a totally natural part of his range, unlike a lot of basses who almost sound like they have two different voices, one for low notes and one for normal singing. Also that Eb1 is monstrous!
WOw! THere are some clips that I've never seen!
He can put vibratto on A1, wow
4:23 gotta be the loudest shit i ever heard
GOD Bless John Ames .
Nice
Thank you!
Amazing!
Thank you!
Any idea when John Ame's birthday is? All I could find was January 1st, and I don't know the year but they don't really have anything on him. He's another rarity!
Given that he graduated high school in 1983, he would probably have been born in 1965, making him 57 years old.
@@BassManMatteo yes! I saw that! He looks good for his age.
truly the best
those upper harmonics, so rich
He loves glottal compression, which when used without a lot of distortion makes bass notes VERY harmonically rich and LOUD.
His vocal depth is the same as Chandrowsky.
Yeah, both Ames and Chandrowsky have insane voices.
Deeper than both chandrowsky and zlatopolsky, none have that power on F1, let alone Eb1
@@ramtinbassdude zlatopolsky projected chest C1 over the choir !!! He was the heaviest bass on the planet Earth
@@manwithmonstervoice1100 Ames can do that as well, they sound about the same weight, I meant Ames is now deeper than 48 year old zlatopolski due to his age bein at least 10 years older than him at the time, Zlatopolski probably could have hit a Full Chest C1 at his final years in his early 70's, then he could do A0 chest fry, I've heard people claim that. His voice was of absolute richness and quality, the only bass I know can compete with is John Ames, Guiness only accepted Zlatopolski's Eb1 as his lowest chest, prob around 50, I say his D1 was okay. But C#1 and C1 were chest fries, at the time the quality of recordings were not that good to identify fry, aldo his upper register was powerful enough at E4, F4 was his highest. But prob in later years an E4 would be impossible. He had the lowest register. At the the youngest age between basses. Ames can do that, though Zlatopolski sounded fuller, if not necessarily heavier, he was bulkier, and prob more testosterone cycled his blood so the voice was more developed, albeit the same range.
Sup Bass man
Sup
Do you have by any chance the link to the full i feel pretty video?
facebook.com/groups/304921782912521/permalink/1739095829495102/
The link might not work since it’s on a private Facebook group called “Octavism, Basstronomy, and Choral”, so you might have to join the group to get access to it.
@@BassManMatteo Thanks a lot!
@@peralax1466 You’re welcome!
The deepest basso profundo alive in the world. Glenn Miller comes next, and little lighter.
I would say they are about equal, but John Ames has a bit more power and resonance while also being able to lighten up his timbre in the 2nd octave to not sound so operatic... such as during his cover of "16 Tons". John Ames is definitely the most versatile basso profundo, in my opinion... without question.
@@johndeeregreen4592 The power and resonance make him a deeper profundo than Glenn Miller, In terms of lighten timbre, the speaking voice of Glenn is far lighter than his singing voice.