Your criticism of the watch thickness is justified when making a comparison. Hoping for Omega to slim down the coaxial movement and keep the solid caseback like on the 75th anniversary edition. But the newer iterations are technically far better watches than the first edition.
I tried it on, coming from an SMPc (no-wave ceramic), and I must say I love it. I also loved the James Bond 60th Anniversary as well as the NTTD, all were amazingly built, dimensions were just right (I have a smaller wrist than you) and I tried on the small size bracelet and was a perfect fit. The clasp thickness is a non-issue in reality.
Great that you like it, and it works for you. We are all in either one camp or the other on thickness and heft. I wonder how you would feel about it as a daily wear.
@@TheRandomWatchDude At the end of the day, it's ~13.5mm not including the domed sapphire crystal. It's not like it's a 15 mm Breitling from back in the day, so it's perfectly manageable. My SMPc is 13.3 mm and it's just fine. Regarding the weight, it's 154 grams, the same exact weight as my SMPc with a few links removed, and I have never complained about the watch being too heavy! It weighs as much as a SS Submariner. Again, it's not a hunk of gold we're talking about...
Hi Mark! Just a little correction: All the Seamasters introduced from 2018 have 20mm lug width. Only exceptions are the ones which have a full ceramic case. Those have 21mm.
@ Yes, you are right! The heritage line has 21mm. I also have one from 2017. I bought and sold many Seamasters 300m’s over the years. The heritage 300 never left my collection. That broad arrow handset is stunning!
I have the new sea master on a zealande strap and it wears really nicely. I can wear it in almost all scenarios. It’s thicker than my VC overseas which about 10mm but it’s not that big a deal. The key for me is to put it on rubber.
If Omega releases a modern SMP with 39-40mm case diameter, with date window at 6, that is thinner, with tapering and less bulky bracelet, and microadjust, I would throw my money at them and they’d sell like crazy. Omega are you listening?!! 😅
The size of Omega SMP 300 is very chunky for my 6.5" wrist. A smaller alternative alongside this will open up to a wider audience. The Sub does wear better but I'd get a 39mm SMP for low key specs alone. However, Omega pricing is absurd. As a brand they are risking being left behind by alternative brands
One of my preferred Seamasters is a 1963 no date Seamaster300 165.024 with first lyre lugs case and bakelite bezel. It comes with a great domed acrylic and I had a black beaver tail strap made for it. It did suffer water damage and the movement was replaced with a spare 552 movement. The pull-push crown was replaced with a screwdown crown, and the bezel too cracked and was replaced with a service bezel. But it works well, looks great and I love to wear it. It is the historic Seamaster diver.
You're right, ALL Omega's from the mid fifties to mid-end sixties were the BEST looking Omega's of all times, best example: The best looking Connies ( Constellation) from Omega are those of the glorious fifties and then in the nineties came a Lady named Cindy Crawford and she decided to draw on paper what the Constellation should look like, now we all know WHY this ugly constellations to say the least, are the shelf-warmer of all jewelleries stores WORLDWIDE. SHAME ON YOU OMEGA
The new SM kicks the PB's ass. Just look at your pics, it wears way smaller. For me it's the perfect size but each to their own. And major change is No Date and inside AR only. The thickness on wrist is proportionate and is a trade off for a much improved movement. I've no issues with the thickness at all, still slips under a cuff. By the way the weight, on mesh it is significantly lighter than the original on bracelet. This watch beats the NTTD imo, better colour, legibility, no broad arrow, and is the perfect weight, not too light. And thousands cheaper.
Barely noticeable thickness and wears well. Updates are exactly what was needed… except for needing to shrink the helium escape a bit IMO. Love it. Blows the Peter Blake away - not even in the same class as the new SMP’s… IMHO
I fully agree with you regarding the thickness and L2L of the new reference. the Peter Blake remains one of the most beautiful versions of the Seamaster 300.
Hi Mark I own the seamaster regatta chronograph yellow face it's a nice watch but I think it time to modernise this watch. if they brought out a heritage version (a bit like the Peter Blake) and then brought out a new model with an integrated helium escape valve and a new tapering bracelet and a different way of doing the wave dial . this would be a massive hit if it was Rolex doing it it would be a disaster but omega change their style of their watches so often they'd get away with it. great video thanks John 👍
I love the Seamaster and have at least one from each of the different versions from 1995 onwards. My favourites are the 2254.50, original 2531.80 and the NTTD. The smaller case size of the originals and the slimmer profile of all three just seem to fit better. I think the newest releases are both an update on the current version to keep things going and a test to see what people might want in the new model, which hopefully should be with us in a couple of years. Hopefully they will slim down the case to 41mm, shave a bit off the height (I'd gladly not have a display caseback) and add to the power reserve........ they also need to start from scratch with a new bracelet. Skeleton hands need to be there but with a sword hand and big triangle dial option for at least one model in the line-up......
Interesting review. I was wondering about the mesh. The monochrome look is nice but I much prefer yours!! Have to say lol with the Panerai hat and criticizing the thickness…I’m still looking for my Panerai. Cool video. Thx!
That bracelet is completely the contrary of what a diver's watch is supposed to be. You can criticize other brands for their size like IWC or Panerai, but at least these brands are consistent with the diver's watch concept and design.
Diver watch is a loose term as it pertains to design. Technically an Overseas and a Nautilus are dive watches and have a bracelet that's nothing like a submariner or oyster style. The mesh is simply an option. The standard bracelet has it's flaws but everyone who doesn't like it only suggests that it look more like a sub. The sword hands are outdated. I own the 50th anniversary SMP (and love it) but those hands don't work with a modern design IMO, besides there are other brands that use sword hands. Nobody but Omega use the skeleton hands, it would be like putting something other than Mercedes hand on a Rolex (even though older models did have different hands).
I think we're stuck with the sword hands. They want a unique and luxurious look and the sword hands provide this. I also prefer the sword hands for their practicality, thing is most customers don't care about practicality but a bit of shine, a bit of bling bling to emphasise where their money has gone.
Multiple complications are going to be larger. Doesn't bother me for a day or so. I rotate my collection so I only wear each watch 12 hrs anyway. If it's you're only watch I guess it could be an issue.
The new SMP needs to basically be like the NTTD, but in a 40mm case. Thinner, lighter, more wearable, grade 2T, and flatter on the wrist. I have an almost a seven in a half inch wrist so the 42mm is not a problem for me, but a lot of people I know and all the videos/comments I read state they want a 40mm. A smaller more wearable watch basically. Not that difficult to understand especially for Omega, but then again…
They can’t make a “typical” seamaster every single time. Even if they achieve the perfect watch, the reality is it will eventually run out of people to sell them to. They have to change things.
I don't know how much see-through case back adds extra thickness when it comes to Omega. Check that "Summer Blue" line up of blue watches that Omega introduced last year or year before. Every one of those dive watches came with a solid case back, yet thickness was exactly the same as earlier models with see-through case backs. The Seamaster Diver 300M and Seamaster Diver 300M SUMMER BLUE, thickness is 13.6mm. The Seamaster 300 Heritage and Heritage SUMMER BLUE with a see-through case back are both 13.9mm thick. It doesn't make sense.
@MrCROBosanceros it's quite deliberate to keep the watch thick and feeling chunky. I always thought it was the thickness of the movement which restricted them but that's clearly not the case, given what they did with the NTTD which had a flat solid case back. Strange design decisions
If a solid case back can bring the thickness of a seamaster down to 12mm, i'dl like a solid case back, otherwise I'd rather have a see through back. I belive a lot of people like me to see the movement when hold the watch in hand. My two cents.
I reckon your PBs lug to lug size isn't much different to the current SMP 300. Yours has male end links, where the current bracelet drops straight off at the pins so they wear smaller than the 50mm suggests.
I’d like to think Omega are just squeezing every last drop from this Seamaster generation and putting off the inevitable which would be a version very much like you suggest. They already have the components to do this so come on Omega!
@francis.oldfield that's what I'm banking on! They have all of the materials they need. They just need to assemble it and the cash registers will start ringing!
I feel like this was just a miss. Give me a black or blue titanium version (I prefer a date) with a tapered bracelet and I’d go out buy one immediately.
I've owned 2 versions of the current SMP range and sold them. Thick, chunky and cumbersome on the wrist. The mesh bracelet on the newer ones is an abomination imo. Really really poor
Agreed 100%! I’ve also owned two versions of the current sea master and also sold them both because of the same exact reasons super fatiguing on the wrist!
Doesn't bother me,if it's a dress watch,yes I prefer under 12mm thick. But I have Pilot watches & dive watches w/ multiple complications that are over 14,I like them too but they have to be fit properly on a great bracelet or strap.
I’ve had hands on with all the new (if you can them that) Seamasters and they are just a load of old parts in different colours chucked together. The black one looks nice but it’s a thick out of date watch. The shocking bezel action is even worse too because the aluminium bezel.
@leeharding8306 Yep it's just a bunch of generic parts thrown together. The crazy thing is that they have other generic parts that would make it 10x better
Good video. I got disappointed by this watch. Went to my AD (they delivered it for me to check it). The watch itself is everything I want ... but the bezel?! Huge play without rotating the bezel and they said its totally ok. Sorry its not ok!
@ totally agree with you. My current seamaster 300m in green has absolutely like minimal play that I don’t notice. If Omega wants to go higher they have to fix all their issues.
I don't think Omega will ever again make the perfect watch as Seamaster 2254.50. They did reissue of 1957 Seamaster 300, and they did a good job with those three watches, in my opinion.
I love the dims you referenced for the older Seamaster, and I wish Omega would bring this specs back (along with the sword hands) to the Seamaster professional line. I’d also happily immediately buy a new model version that had those specs!
@@denniswilliams7304 Omega has also no sports watches in the 36mm range like they used to have. It's like all of a sudden they think everyone has an 8" wrist!
Well I would argue that all movements look the same until the manufacturer puts some pretty patterns on the exposed parts. Rolex make great movements but they look boring as heck.
I agreed the bracelet is horrible. That is the way I sold my NTTD in a few months. No micro adjustment and cannot find the right hole to fit perfect. Omega make a mistake for the third time to use this bracelet. In my opinion, do not use another bracelet then the Omega catalog show you on this model. So it is better to buy another watch. And sorry, I don’t buy a Panerai.
There are some really nice milanese bracelets that have a microadjustable clasp on them. Omega could make it, but they favour the super-chunky design language at the expense of comfort. I'm so upset you don't like Panerai 😒 🤣
@angikarchmer5633 I'm very clear that this is all just my opinion. I'm not saying the crystal should be flat, but they've gone bulbous with it to get that heritage look that it doesn't need. Just slightly curved would be fine 🙂
Why is everyone so obsessed with mm. Maybe you could ask Omega if they can make you a bespoke seamaster for you. This winge by you was a hard watch. Sorry 😢 Don't like it then don't buy it, simple!!!
@maxinahunt8652 Firstly, I have given positive comments in the past. However, I'm entitled to my opinion just like him. If you're not prepared to accept criticism positive or negative, then do not post content!!
I got my 2254.50 yesterday and it is such a beautiful watch. 😊
Congratulations!
I was watching a video yesterday of billionaires watches,many had that model.
Congrats on your watch! Wear it in good health! Do you have a bezel play ?
@pavelnikolaev2660 thank you, mate. The bezel on my 2254 is in perfect condition, maybe a little bit stiff and hast no play at all.
Your criticism of the watch thickness is justified when making a comparison. Hoping for Omega to slim down the coaxial movement and keep the solid caseback like on the 75th anniversary edition. But the newer iterations are technically far better watches than the first edition.
I tried it on, coming from an SMPc (no-wave ceramic), and I must say I love it. I also loved the James Bond 60th Anniversary as well as the NTTD, all were amazingly built, dimensions were just right (I have a smaller wrist than you) and I tried on the small size bracelet and was a perfect fit. The clasp thickness is a non-issue in reality.
Great that you like it, and it works for you. We are all in either one camp or the other on thickness and heft. I wonder how you would feel about it as a daily wear.
@@TheRandomWatchDude At the end of the day, it's ~13.5mm not including the domed sapphire crystal. It's not like it's a 15 mm Breitling from back in the day, so it's perfectly manageable. My SMPc is 13.3 mm and it's just fine.
Regarding the weight, it's 154 grams, the same exact weight as my SMPc with a few links removed, and I have never complained about the watch being too heavy! It weighs as much as a SS Submariner. Again, it's not a hunk of gold we're talking about...
Agree with your observations. I love the electric blue mid size Peter Blake. Also prefer the sword hands. Thanks for another entertaining post.🌊🌊🤿
Hi Mark! Just a little correction: All the Seamasters introduced from 2018 have 20mm lug width. Only exceptions are the ones which have a full ceramic case. Those have 21mm.
Thanks I wasnt certain when I said it, as my heritage 300 from 2020 had a 21mm lug width
@ Yes, you are right! The heritage line has 21mm. I also have one from 2017. I bought and sold many Seamasters 300m’s over the years. The heritage 300 never left my collection. That broad arrow handset is stunning!
I have the new sea master on a zealande strap and it wears really nicely. I can wear it in almost all scenarios. It’s thicker than my VC overseas which about 10mm but it’s not that big a deal. The key for me is to put it on rubber.
Was shopping for an omega few months back.. ended up purchasing a Tudor master chronometer. Quite happy 😊
I have just bought a Peter Blake and I’m picking it up this Tuesday…. Can’t wait to have the best seamaster in my collection. :) Great video as usual
@@darios.3114 congratulations 🎊 you will love it!
my sd43 is a tad chonky but she’s my chonker
I love my SD43 chunkmeister!
If Omega releases a modern SMP with 39-40mm case diameter, with date window at 6, that is thinner, with tapering and less bulky bracelet, and microadjust, I would throw my money at them and they’d sell like crazy. Omega are you listening?!! 😅
The size of Omega SMP 300 is very chunky for my 6.5" wrist. A smaller alternative alongside this will open up to a wider audience.
The Sub does wear better but I'd get a 39mm SMP for low key specs alone.
However, Omega pricing is absurd. As a brand they are risking being left behind by alternative brands
vintage styling, but the seamaster 1957 LE is 39mm, i have that and the new one and it wears much smaller, i love it
The current seamaster is a stunning watch very well made.
@@serifdincer208 undeniably!
@@TheRandomWatchDude i like your content
One of my preferred Seamasters is a 1963 no date Seamaster300 165.024 with first lyre lugs case and bakelite bezel. It comes with a great domed acrylic and I had a black beaver tail strap made for it. It did suffer water damage and the movement was replaced with a spare 552 movement. The pull-push crown was replaced with a screwdown crown, and the bezel too cracked and was replaced with a service bezel. But it works well, looks great and I love to wear it. It is the historic Seamaster diver.
You're right, ALL Omega's from the mid fifties to mid-end sixties were the BEST looking Omega's of all times, best example: The best looking Connies ( Constellation) from Omega are those of the glorious fifties and then in the nineties came a Lady named Cindy Crawford and she decided to draw on paper what the Constellation should look like, now we all know WHY this ugly constellations to say the least, are the shelf-warmer of all jewelleries stores WORLDWIDE. SHAME ON YOU OMEGA
The new SM kicks the PB's ass. Just look at your pics, it wears way smaller. For me it's the perfect size but each to their own. And major change is No Date and inside AR only. The thickness on wrist is proportionate and is a trade off for a much improved movement. I've no issues with the thickness at all, still slips under a cuff. By the way the weight, on mesh it is significantly lighter than the original on bracelet. This watch beats the NTTD imo, better colour, legibility, no broad arrow, and is the perfect weight, not too light. And thousands cheaper.
Barely noticeable thickness and wears well. Updates are exactly what was needed… except for needing to shrink the helium escape a bit IMO. Love it. Blows the Peter Blake away - not even in the same class as the new SMP’s… IMHO
I fully agree with you regarding the thickness and L2L of the new reference. the Peter Blake remains one of the most beautiful versions of the Seamaster 300.
Hi Mark I own the seamaster regatta chronograph yellow face it's a nice watch but I think it time to modernise this watch. if they brought out a heritage version (a bit like the Peter Blake) and then brought out a new model with an integrated helium escape valve and a new tapering bracelet and a different way of doing the wave dial . this would be a massive hit if it was Rolex doing it it would be a disaster but omega change their style of their watches so often they'd get away with it. great video thanks John 👍
I love the Seamaster and have at least one from each of the different versions from 1995 onwards. My favourites are the 2254.50, original 2531.80 and the NTTD. The smaller case size of the originals and the slimmer profile of all three just seem to fit better. I think the newest releases are both an update on the current version to keep things going and a test to see what people might want in the new model, which hopefully should be with us in a couple of years. Hopefully they will slim down the case to 41mm, shave a bit off the height (I'd gladly not have a display caseback) and add to the power reserve........ they also need to start from scratch with a new bracelet. Skeleton hands need to be there but with a sword hand and big triangle dial option for at least one model in the line-up......
Sword hands died gracefully with the 2254 / 2264 models. You own the last gen of sword hands. Keep it safe ;)
Keeping this one for sure!
I have the Peter Black watch, too, best everyday beater diver watch without getting mugged 🎉
It was a very enjoyable day mate, possibly should be a quarterly trip? ⌚️😏
Sounds like a plan. Easter?
@ Done!
Interesting review. I was wondering about the mesh. The monochrome look is nice but I much prefer yours!! Have to say lol with the Panerai hat and criticizing the thickness…I’m still looking for my Panerai.
Cool video. Thx!
That bracelet is completely the contrary of what a diver's watch is supposed to be. You can criticize other brands for their size like IWC or Panerai, but at least these brands are consistent with the diver's watch concept and design.
@AK_1971 totally ridiculous bracelet for a Seamaster SMP 300. Ploprof? Fine but not the SMP
Diver watch is a loose term as it pertains to design. Technically an Overseas and a Nautilus are dive watches and have a bracelet that's nothing like a submariner or oyster style. The mesh is simply an option. The standard bracelet has it's flaws but everyone who doesn't like it only suggests that it look more like a sub. The sword hands are outdated. I own the 50th anniversary SMP (and love it) but those hands don't work with a modern design IMO, besides there are other brands that use sword hands. Nobody but Omega use the skeleton hands, it would be like putting something other than Mercedes hand on a Rolex (even though older models did have different hands).
A proper dive watch should have a rubber strap for me,not a bracelet.
I think we're stuck with the sword hands. They want a unique and luxurious look and the sword hands provide this. I also prefer the sword hands for their practicality, thing is most customers don't care about practicality but a bit of shine, a bit of bling bling to emphasise where their money has gone.
I actually enjoy a bit of chunk, my problem with this piece is the pricing in comparison to the standard model.
There are a lot of guys who love thick, heavy watches.
Yes and I am one of them, but not on a Seamaster. Save the heft for the Planet Ocean.
Multiple complications are going to be larger. Doesn't bother me for a day or so. I rotate my collection so I only wear each watch 12 hrs anyway. If it's you're only watch I guess it could be an issue.
Upvoted.
@@Dave-F451 Thanks 😊
I’ve tried on the sea master it very nice
Nice one mark 👍🏽
The new SMP needs to basically be like the NTTD, but in a 40mm case. Thinner, lighter, more wearable, grade 2T, and flatter on the wrist. I have an almost a seven in a half inch wrist so the 42mm is not a problem for me, but a lot of people I know and all the videos/comments I read state they want a 40mm. A smaller more wearable watch basically. Not that difficult to understand especially for Omega, but then again…
@Riff4Raff Might as well just call it the Swatch Seamaster as it's not an Omega anymore imo
@ huh? So the NTTD is not a SMP with smaller specs?
They can’t make a “typical” seamaster every single time. Even if they achieve the perfect watch, the reality is it will eventually run out of people to sell them to. They have to change things.
I don't know how much see-through case back adds extra thickness when it comes to Omega.
Check that "Summer Blue" line up of blue watches that Omega introduced last year or year before. Every one of those dive watches came with a solid case back, yet thickness was exactly the same as earlier models with see-through case backs. The Seamaster Diver 300M and Seamaster Diver 300M SUMMER BLUE, thickness is 13.6mm.
The Seamaster 300 Heritage and Heritage SUMMER BLUE with a see-through case back are both 13.9mm thick.
It doesn't make sense.
@MrCROBosanceros it's quite deliberate to keep the watch thick and feeling chunky. I always thought it was the thickness of the movement which restricted them but that's clearly not the case, given what they did with the NTTD which had a flat solid case back. Strange design decisions
Agreed.
If a solid case back can bring the thickness of a seamaster down to 12mm, i'dl like a solid case back, otherwise I'd rather have a see through back. I belive a lot of people like me to see the movement when hold the watch in hand. My two cents.
I reckon your PBs lug to lug size isn't much different to the current SMP 300.
Yours has male end links, where the current bracelet drops straight off at the pins so they wear smaller than the 50mm suggests.
@@scollyutube maybe that's why Omega put it on the mesh, as it's too long for a proper Seamaster bracelet.
2018 also had 20mm lug width
Thanks yes it was my mistake as my SM300 Heritage had 21mm lugs
I’d like to think Omega are just squeezing every last drop from this Seamaster generation and putting off the inevitable which would be a version very much like you suggest. They already have the components to do this so come on Omega!
@francis.oldfield that's what I'm banking on! They have all of the materials they need. They just need to assemble it and the cash registers will start ringing!
I feel like this was just a miss. Give me a black or blue titanium version (I prefer a date) with a tapered bracelet and I’d go out buy one immediately.
The current gen seamaster date has 20mm lug width. The new Sub has 21mm tho
I've owned 2 versions of the current SMP range and sold them. Thick, chunky and cumbersome on the wrist. The mesh bracelet on the newer ones is an abomination imo. Really really poor
Agreed 100%! I’ve also owned two versions of the current sea master and also sold them both because of the same exact reasons super fatiguing on the wrist!
Nearly 14mm thickness is absurd. I'll keep my midsize from 1999.
Doesn't bother me,if it's a dress watch,yes I prefer under 12mm thick. But I have Pilot watches & dive watches w/ multiple complications that are over 14,I like them too but they have to be fit properly on a great bracelet or strap.
The Omega strategy of hit & miss is really what is just keeping them from greatness , they should deal with their launches more seriously.
I’ve had hands on with all the new (if you can them that) Seamasters and they are just a load of old parts in different colours chucked together. The black one looks nice but it’s a thick out of date watch. The shocking bezel action is even worse too because the aluminium bezel.
@leeharding8306 Yep it's just a bunch of generic parts thrown together. The crazy thing is that they have other generic parts that would make it 10x better
2254.50 is the king ,period !
The PO 2500 is the one.
Good video. I got disappointed by this watch. Went to my AD (they delivered it for me to check it). The watch itself is everything I want ... but the bezel?! Huge play without rotating the bezel and they said its totally ok. Sorry its not ok!
Omega dive bezels are not very tactile. They work but they don't feel quality like a Rolex or Tudor
@ totally agree with you. My current seamaster 300m in green has absolutely like minimal play that I don’t notice. If Omega wants to go higher they have to fix all their issues.
I don't think Omega will ever again make the perfect watch as Seamaster 2254.50.
They did reissue of 1957 Seamaster 300, and they did a good job with those three watches, in my opinion.
@MrCROBosanceros The current date version of the SMP300 is overdue a refresh. Let's see what happens in 2025!
I love the dims you referenced for the older Seamaster, and I wish Omega would bring this specs back (along with the sword hands) to the Seamaster professional line. I’d also happily immediately buy a new model version that had those specs!
@@denniswilliams7304 Omega has also no sports watches in the 36mm range like they used to have. It's like all of a sudden they think everyone has an 8" wrist!
The skeleton hands are the biggest turn off to me.
Cousin of timepiece gentleman 🧐
Your Seamaster doesn't have a see through back because it has a simple ETA 2892 movement. Who wants to look at that?
Well I would argue that all movements look the same until the manufacturer puts some pretty patterns on the exposed parts. Rolex make great movements but they look boring as heck.
I agreed the bracelet is horrible. That is the way I sold my NTTD in a few months. No micro adjustment and cannot find the right hole to fit perfect. Omega make a mistake for the third time to use this bracelet.
In my opinion, do not use another bracelet then the Omega catalog show you on this model. So it is better to buy another watch. And sorry, I don’t buy a Panerai.
There are some really nice milanese bracelets that have a microadjustable clasp on them. Omega could make it, but they favour the super-chunky design language at the expense of comfort. I'm so upset you don't like Panerai 😒 🤣
Neo Vintage must be in the 15-20 year old age. Older Omega is always better.
I refute your statement that a Seamaster shouldn't have a domed crystal. You make the statement like it's a fact, but it's just your opinion.
@angikarchmer5633 I'm very clear that this is all just my opinion. I'm not saying the crystal should be flat, but they've gone bulbous with it to get that heritage look that it doesn't need. Just slightly curved would be fine 🙂
Why is everyone so obsessed with mm. Maybe you could ask Omega if they can make you a bespoke seamaster for you. This winge by you was a hard watch. Sorry 😢 Don't like it then don't buy it, simple!!!
If you don’t like his opinion then don’t watch him. Take your own advise and don’t be so mean.
@maxinahunt8652 Firstly, I have given positive comments in the past. However, I'm entitled to my opinion just like him. If you're not prepared to accept criticism positive or negative, then do not post content!!
Stupid see through caseback.
Very disappointing