Gmktec casually outcompeting everyone in terms of pricing is nothing new Generally theyre 30% cheaper, and have import duty free shipping available to some key western regions. All whilst still being great about upgradability and general quality (man Im shilling hard here)
As I see it, the pure difference in performance is too small to matter. The difference comes from the driver support difference as AMD sucks at it compared to Nvidia, but much better than Intel. Also the power consumption difference is huge. If one already had the 5600G system, especially if it had room for a dedicated GPU, I don't see the reason to definitely jump to the 6600H. If you don't have a system and you are between the two then it is more difficult to suggest the 5600G. At least if we are taking into consideration the pure performance. The 8700G you mentioned is a CPU I would consider for a main PC if I were to build one now. Thanks for the video.
Doesn't matter whether it's AMD or Nvidia both of their drivers suck in my experience in Nvidia has it happened more often depending on what you're doing especially when it comes to anything VR every driver update for Nvidia brakes VR every time
The Windows update really helped the Vega system (really all AMD systems). It made a huge difference from older test runs. However the 6600H was really helped by the 660m being double the power of the Vega graphics that made up for its generally slower clocks. Awesome work!
Good video. Wendel from Level 1 Tech did a video about this a while ago. An igpu will always use the amount of ram it needs, run a benchmark set to the lowest allocated ram setting and then run the benchmark again at the highest ram allocated setting, and they will be very similar/same. All allocating the ram amount does is tell the OS to always set that amount of ram aside for the igpu. There is no benefit to gaming with it set to the highest. Once I found that out, I set it lower if I am not using it for gaming. Don't ask me why it is like this, I don't know.
Biggest difference to me is size and cost. Once I get above 30-40fps I stop noticing much difference unless it jumps around. Most itx PCs I've start around $1000 vs $300.
I have Lenovo laptop that runs on 6800hs. Honestly, what you said on the ddr5 4800mhz is correct. It sucks big time. I understand now why AMD decided to skip that generation as ddr5 speed and timings at that time are still in the infancy stages.
The 5600g seems to throttle a bit? It's touching near 80c sometimes. Perhaps a little bit undervolt for the 5600g will help increase performance(or lower it)?
Check out the merch store! | evo-tech-shop.fourthwall.com
BOSGAME P5 | amzn.to/4eE7JNK
R5 5600G | s.click.aliexpress.com/e/_Dm39LBJ
AM4 ITX Board | s.click.aliexpress.com/e/_DleAr8D
32 GB DDR4 | s.click.aliexpress.com/e/_DkdRk6D
RDNA2 crushes VEGA
You can get a much better newer mini PC cheaper than the one shown. GMKtec AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS Mini PC--NucBox K8 Plus
Gmktec casually outcompeting everyone in terms of pricing is nothing new
Generally theyre 30% cheaper, and have import duty free shipping available to some key western regions. All whilst still being great about upgradability and general quality (man Im shilling hard here)
As I see it, the pure difference in performance is too small to matter. The difference comes from the driver support difference as AMD sucks at it compared to Nvidia, but much better than Intel. Also the power consumption difference is huge.
If one already had the 5600G system, especially if it had room for a dedicated GPU, I don't see the reason to definitely jump to the 6600H.
If you don't have a system and you are between the two then it is more difficult to suggest the 5600G. At least if we are taking into consideration the pure performance.
The 8700G you mentioned is a CPU I would consider for a main PC if I were to build one now.
Thanks for the video.
Doesn't matter whether it's AMD or Nvidia both of their drivers suck in my experience in Nvidia has it happened more often depending on what you're doing especially when it comes to anything VR every driver update for Nvidia brakes VR every time
@@jt3000o I have no experience with VR.
The Windows update really helped the Vega system (really all AMD systems). It made a huge difference from older test runs. However the 6600H was really helped by the 660m being double the power of the Vega graphics that made up for its generally slower clocks. Awesome work!
Good video. Wendel from Level 1 Tech did a video about this a while ago. An igpu will always use the amount of ram it needs, run a benchmark set to the lowest allocated ram setting and then run the benchmark again at the highest ram allocated setting, and they will be very similar/same.
All allocating the ram amount does is tell the OS to always set that amount of ram aside for the igpu. There is no benefit to gaming with it set to the highest. Once I found that out, I set it lower if I am not using it for gaming. Don't ask me why it is like this, I don't know.
Biggest difference to me is size and cost. Once I get above 30-40fps I stop noticing much difference unless it jumps around. Most itx PCs I've start around $1000 vs $300.
I have Lenovo laptop that runs on 6800hs. Honestly, what you said on the ddr5 4800mhz is correct. It sucks big time. I understand now why AMD decided to skip that generation as ddr5 speed and timings at that time are still in the infancy stages.
The 5600g seems to throttle a bit? It's touching near 80c sometimes. Perhaps a little bit undervolt for the 5600g will help increase performance(or lower it)?
I have 5600g and 6600xt runs every think maxed out 1440p
does 6600H support AV1 encode and decode?
What kind of case is that 5600g in?
Inwin chopin