Sikorsky-Boeing Defiant: The Way Forward

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 21

  • @meltdown1232000
    @meltdown1232000 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    They should build this and the Bell V-280. There'd be nothing those two couldn't do.

  • @joseantoniocamposp8286
    @joseantoniocamposp8286 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Chile tiene que encargar 12 de esos helicópteros

  • @sovanrithnoun2870
    @sovanrithnoun2870 ปีที่แล้ว

    nice

  • @phairecouchpotato3912
    @phairecouchpotato3912 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This would be great in Arma 3!

    • @NedTheUndead
      @NedTheUndead 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Looks like there's been a VTOL project with the S-97 and more for a few years now. forums.bohemia.net/forums/topic/195450-project-vertical-lift-2035/?page=7

  • @oljasinabek5923
    @oljasinabek5923 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍💪💪

  • @johnpitchlynn9341
    @johnpitchlynn9341 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This should be Marine One!

    • @scottw5315
      @scottw5315 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They have an array of transports that become Marine One when a real President is aboard. I like the old S-3. It's a classic. Upgrade engines and systems and it has no sell by date. Reagan's Marine One is in his library in Simi Valley, California if you're ever out that way. Oh, and Air Force One is there too.

    • @johnpitchlynn9341
      @johnpitchlynn9341 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@scottw5315 Been there...seen it. Bu the Sikorsky-Boeing FVL Defiant should be the new Marine One with an enlarged fuselage. It's faster, reliable and it's a Sikorsky!

  • @scottw5315
    @scottw5315 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The Comanche lives sixty years after it should have been built.

  • @АнатолийКулик-в4ж
    @АнатолийКулик-в4ж 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Это мне напоминает полеты на Луну. :-)))

  • @АнатолийНовиков-ч1п
    @АнатолийНовиков-ч1п 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    жалко под водой не плавает

    • @GreXOG
      @GreXOG 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      lol

  • @bolk294
    @bolk294 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I never once saw or heard the word "Stealth" and I don't believe in coincidences ... Did anyone forget that it is the key today for all human-manned vehicles, or have people reduced its intrinsic value? I don't want a vehicle with all those advantages that are easily detectable by a hypersonic missile, a drone, or a satellite ... With all due respect, my esteemed "Sikorsky-Boeing" team: BACK to the drawing board ...

    • @TheFlyingZulu
      @TheFlyingZulu 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      A low and fast flying helo can slip in and out of spots before being detected by any of that. It all comes down to mission planning and requirements... This fast and extended range helo looks awesome to me.

    • @bolk294
      @bolk294 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TheFlyingZulu Well, I respect your opinion, but - Even the most common DU ammo - Like a .50 deployed from a simple assault / sniper rifle can damage that hello. Remember what happened with the F-117...You can apply the same logic...

    • @aaronmarshall4871
      @aaronmarshall4871 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Design is dictated by the requirements as specified by the customer.

    • @scottw5315
      @scottw5315 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      At night we defeat most manpads and AAA. Nap of earth and/or masked by terrain defeats most radar guided systems. No need to worry. We've been operating in high threat environments for half a century.

  • @ธนูเกตุรัตน์-ฑ4ส
    @ธนูเกตุรัตน์-ฑ4ส 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    รัฐบาลไทยควรจัดหาเข้ามาดีกว่าเรือดำน้ำมากสามารถติดอาวุทกำจัดเรือดำน้ำได้ติดอาวุทวิสัยไกลได้

  • @davidsmithson9236
    @davidsmithson9236 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice cartoon.