@@markspencer171 The more weapons we have, the less chance you ever get drafted and the less chance we have a large war. That is why we fight so hard to stay ahead of our enemies. Think big picture.
I hope they hammer the pusher-prop issue into soldiers’ heads so there’s never a guy running into a hot prop on the ground. Even though they show the pusher stopping on the ground, it’s more likely pilots will want to keep it spinning so they can get forward thrust the moment they advance the prop, rather than waiting for RPMs.
Rigid Rotor is the way to go with this. Back in the 60's Lockheed (yes, once they made good stuff) strapped 2x jet engines to a lifting body and got 300+ mph chopper with incredible stability and awesome carrying capacity.
@@thejetace42 yeah I was thinking of coming back here too Iam actually impressed with the choice because I understand why- On paper they looked different but the two are very much equally complex with the tiltrotor having the advantage of actually being in it's second generation while the deviant was the first. Thousands of hours of experience with the osprey came quite in handy.
@@cedriceric9730 you are right but the v 280 has higher speed longer range and increased load capacity and it was ahead of schedule and i can understand why the army choose it
It's the perfect replacement for the black hawk,valor just doesn't fit the requirements,they should focus more on making valor a ofsprey replacement then a black hawk
@@neurofiedyamato8763 Most Rotary craft that have refueling probes are for Special operations due to their clandestine mission sets. Standard variants operate from FRAPs ,FOBs and airfields closer to front lines. So its not a necessity for line units. Least that's what I imagine the train of thought is.
@@verdebusterAP true but, tilt rotors have shown to be less effective than regular helicopters, but more expensive. Unless they have solved how long it takes to slow, land then go again. If i remember right that was on of the main issues with the Osprey. Please correct me if I'm wrong though as I do like to learn.
It will be a miss if we don’t see the defiant x design goes to vain. It should win even if the us army decides to go for v280 they should order some numbers of defiant x also
Im not any insider just electromechanical engineer, but maybe You should Xchange these numbers :-) Clearly vissible that its efficiency is some 80% and overall costs? I think that in millitary the cost should be viewed from "down/mission complete" relationship ;-) But Im only interested civilian ;)
Very good question! Humm, how to explain this? Ok, A US Navy squadron flying helicopters in Vietnam was given the mission if search and rescue.spatter the end of the war a study showed that more squadron personnel were killed then then rescued, that was HC9. Or there was a US Navy F14 squadron that had less then a 15% mission availability rate, due to the navy transferring its problem planes to that squadron to hide its actual fleet availability rate as reported to Congress.
Its a complicated subject, but well worth understanding.. So the US Air Force just deployed some F35s to Europe to cope with the Ukrainian crisis... How many are full mission capable? After deployment?
So are you guys gonna put defensive lasers on it or something because it looks like it could just become yet another hashtag in the middle of a battle. Just saying.
Totally no conflict of interest when former officers, especially senior, end up in the employ of defense contractors. I'm certain that has zero effect on acquisitions. No corruption to see here - move along, move along.
Idk., two kinds of propeller rotors would make it look weird and it looks to bulky still,. I think, but other than that the idea is on point, great work you guys 🤘👍🇺🇸👌
True it looks bulky but I think that's just bad CGI of a potential final design. The prototype SB-1 looks pretty slick and it's abaout the same size as a blackhawk unlike the V-280. Either way as long as it has the performance it can be as ugly as sin. It'll just join the B-52, A-10, Chinook, Apache . . . ok maybe we are setting a bad trend there.
@@Orphican they should reactivate the heli program that they used on the raid of bin laden I mean they should mix something up with that model or see if something can come from that.
The UH-60 Blackhawk is a beautiful helicopter, I want it to remain operational for many more decades, and never need to be replaced from the useless defiant x.
Feel free to move to a country that is outside the protective umbrella of that military industrial complex and the global supply chain that is maintained by it. You're correct that it has nothing to do with freedom. You're naïve however if you believe your safe, comfortable life is just granted to you. It's bought by men willing to to violence on your behalf.
Freedom isn't "free". The cost of your freedom is the cost it takes to provide deterrence such that your adversaries (nation states with an opposing world view) won't take it away.
@@danielromerosol4158 It's pretty simple really. It's the reason you lock your doors at night or have a security system in your house. It's the reason we have police, lawyers, judges, and soldiers. A fundamental trait of humanity that never changes is that we lie, cheat, steal, and commit murder etc. The rule of law is what prevents complete chaos. The threat of punishment for breaking said laws is the deterrent. It's an imperfect system however it still begs the question? Who's rule of law do you want to follow? The rule of law that the west and its allies generally follow or that of rogue states or the opposing world view allied by China, Russia, Iran, North Korea etc? The lines in the sand of the geopolitical landscape were drawn a long time ago.
@@danielromerosol4158 Free to do whatever it is that we want to do. Without concern for what anyone outside our family and friends thinks about it. Like none of your business freedom. Like keeping at bay our vicious enemies that hate us and speak through your entitled voice to try to mock and shame us, the men and women that serve, that live And die protecting our most precious resources, safe and happy and thriving at home, namely our wives, daughters and mother's in that order, for God, family and country in that order. Love that, person of uncertain or unknown gender. If you are ever truly interested in a deep schooling on what it means to even be a Man, re-read this reply and simply pay attention.
Nothing against the aircraft. I think its pretty cool but I really am not a fan of these old military personnel, me it officers generals, or your average grunt pitching the product. Just screams like they've been paid. it's one thing to see a neutral party testing the aircraft and reviewing it... but it is another when the company itself have ex-military personnel doing the advert.
Bro.. all you need is some guy with a rpg or a igla and a guy on a technical with a dshka mounted to take defiant x down. That is if she can out run bullets and missiles at low level. Combat coefficient my rear end if you’ve got baddies armed with Iglas and Tunguskas it will be hell for the pilots to fly under fire, Vietnam all over again.
The war in UKR proves that rotary wing vulnerability to manpads has not improved since 1970. Too expensive to produce in numbers, too expensive to train and maintain, too vulnerable to fly near the enemy. It's only function is to create employment so that congress members can get re-elected. The transport role can be done with trucks for a fraction of the cost. It's only real value is SAR. Tiltrotors can't do this because of vicious down draft.
With more lift capability than conventional helicopters, an attack helicopter version of the Defiant X would be able to carry more and heavier armament than Apache.
Agent America USA ka define ka helicopter ko Bharat mein jarurat hai ismein jo system vagaira aadhunik hai iska vyavhar aur Bharat ko naye tarike se advance Banane mein bahut kam aaega iska behtarin ke liye aur Bharat mein advance technology ke liye isko bhi like kam se kam 500 ya 10 ka sanka mein Jarur laen
Looks like shit Design is terrible for the sheer size Terrible seating for the oversized fuselage This is why medium and heavy helicopters are separated
Awesome, the more I see and hear the more I like it, Hybrid of co axial helicopter and a turboprop aircraft
Glad to see you like death machines paid for by taxpayer money with the soul purpose of killing. Nice.
@@markspencer171 Or humanitarian for rescuing survivors during a catastrophe? Glad to see you could only think narrowed mindlessly though.
@@markspencer171 The more weapons we have, the less chance you ever get drafted and the less chance we have a large war. That is why we fight so hard to stay ahead of our enemies. Think big picture.
"Coaxial" is one word, not two.
@@starrlynn2523 call the police, jeeze
I hope they hammer the pusher-prop issue into soldiers’ heads so there’s never a guy running into a hot prop on the ground.
Even though they show the pusher stopping on the ground, it’s more likely pilots will want to keep it spinning so they can get forward thrust the moment they advance the prop, rather than waiting for RPMs.
I imagine they’ll disable the prop below a certain altitude (like 1.5m) at the software level.
Rigid Rotor is the way to go with this. Back in the 60's Lockheed (yes, once they made good stuff) strapped 2x jet engines to a lifting body and got 300+ mph chopper with incredible stability and awesome carrying capacity.
I’ve been watching stuff about this heli for a long time! Good job Lockheed Martin!
Lulz
@@IvorMektin1701 what r u twelve?
Glad to see you like death machines paid for by taxpayer money with the soul purpose of killing. Nice.
I want this Defiant X to win the contract so bad!
Its going to win
@@cedriceric9730 sorry bell won
@@thejetace42 yeah
I was thinking of coming back here too
Iam actually impressed with the choice because I understand why-
On paper they looked different but the two are very much equally complex with the tiltrotor having the advantage of actually being in it's second generation while the deviant was the first.
Thousands of hours of experience with the osprey came quite in handy.
@@cedriceric9730 you are right but the v 280 has higher speed longer range and increased load capacity and it was ahead of schedule and i can understand why the army choose it
What are the comparisons between sb1 and blackhawkin terms of the following?
A. Footprint?
B. Power to payload ratio?
It's the perfect replacement for the black hawk,valor just doesn't fit the requirements,they should focus more on making valor a ofsprey replacement then a black hawk
It's a very futuristic design love it
Glad to see you like death machines paid for by taxpayer money with the soul purpose of killing. Nice.
Kamov would like a word with you.
One thing I still haven't seen or heard is refueling capability. I'm guessing adding a boom would come latter.
Yeah. Gotta get the normal variants out the door first.
@@augustmarshall2961 refueling should be standard for all variants though?
@@neurofiedyamato8763 Most Rotary craft that have refueling probes are for Special operations due to their clandestine mission sets. Standard variants operate from FRAPs ,FOBs and airfields closer to front lines. So its not a necessity for line units. Least that's what I imagine the train of thought is.
Thats the key difference between the Defiant and Valour
Adapting boom is simpler on the Valour
@@verdebusterAP true but, tilt rotors have shown to be less effective than regular helicopters, but more expensive. Unless they have solved how long it takes to slow, land then go again. If i remember right that was on of the main issues with the Osprey. Please correct me if I'm wrong though as I do like to learn.
Just a beautiful, fast, ubiquitous, maneuverable and survivable aircraft. Outstanding job by the great folks at Sikorsky / Lockheed-Martin.
Glad to see you like death machines paid for by taxpayer money with the soul purpose of killing. Nice.
@@markspencer171 Yes they're really cool
@@matiassam2507 cool for killing?
@@markspencer171 Hella cool
@@markspencer171 hella cool for killing bro
So beautifully engineered, are armed variants possible?🇺🇸
Sikorsky Raider X
That's the point of the program. It will inevitably be armed and manufactured with such variants 😊
I would make it a bit bigger with stealth more in mind. Maybe modular so it can carry pontoons, extra fuel, MG, weapon pods, etc.
How is it supposed to be more stealthy if it’s bigger and also the entire point is to land in small spaces can’t do that if it’s bigger
@@commanderdragco3123 Whats true, but shape and material, cover, internal structure is important for stealth. Same with IR radiation.
How much and can I get it in red
So meanwhile in Russia: "Blyatt! Boris! Let's make hybrid anti aircraft and radar hard to avoid by western!"
Made by the best aerospace company in the world.
Glad to see you like death machines paid for by taxpayer money with the soul purpose of killing. Nice.
Awsome aircraft.this idea has been aroubd for awhile I guess.
If it’s stronger than a Chinook ( CH-47) I am all for it
Im excited to see them reveal this
The cabin is pretty small in comparison to the overall size...
did you guys notice it has two thingys?
Well good luck to the people whose job is to maintain that aircraft.
It will be a miss if we don’t see the defiant x design goes to vain. It should win even if the us army decides to go for v280 they should order some numbers of defiant x also
Awesome, can make more make land I waters that cool stuff
Costs? And maintenance? Getting 20% more capability may not be worth 80% more in costs and maintenance...
Im not any insider just electromechanical engineer, but maybe You should Xchange these numbers :-) Clearly vissible that its efficiency is some 80% and overall costs? I think that in millitary the cost should be viewed from "down/mission complete" relationship ;-) But Im only interested civilian ;)
Very good question! Humm, how to explain this? Ok, A US Navy squadron flying helicopters in Vietnam was given the mission if search and rescue.spatter the end of the war a study showed that more squadron personnel were killed then then rescued, that was HC9. Or there was a US Navy F14 squadron that had less then a 15% mission availability rate, due to the navy transferring its problem planes to that squadron to hide its actual fleet availability rate as reported to Congress.
I deployed on ships and over seas many times, at sea I reported about 85% full operational readiness in a typical month. That's good.
Its a complicated subject, but well worth understanding.. So the US Air Force just deployed some F35s to Europe to cope with the Ukrainian crisis... How many are full mission capable? After deployment?
So, what does full mission capable mean? In the US military, airplanes are assigned, many millions, that the plane should perform!
Yeah im the first, greatings from colombia
Colombia, muy caliente chicas😍
Confined space is good but its not that much of a deal
It is if you see your own civilian population as a potential adversary
Is this the one that got Bin Hidin years ago?
It was a modify blackhawk with stealth technology.
So are you guys gonna put defensive lasers on it or something because it looks like it could just become yet another hashtag in the middle of a battle. Just saying.
Hello from Ukraine
Totally no conflict of interest when former officers, especially senior, end up in the employ of defense contractors. I'm certain that has zero effect on acquisitions. No corruption to see here - move along, move along.
When does this video game release?
Outstanding 👍
So whatever black hawk can do, DX can do too with less time and less waste. Sound like it's time for a change.🙄
Idk., two kinds of propeller rotors would make it look weird and it looks to bulky still,. I think, but other than that the idea is on point, great work you guys 🤘👍🇺🇸👌
True it looks bulky but I think that's just bad CGI of a potential final design. The prototype SB-1 looks pretty slick and it's abaout the same size as a blackhawk unlike the V-280. Either way as long as it has the performance it can be as ugly as sin. It'll just join the B-52, A-10, Chinook, Apache . . . ok maybe we are setting a bad trend there.
@@Orphican they should reactivate the heli program that they used on the raid of bin laden I mean they should mix something up with that model or see if something can come from that.
Much better for Navy.
Respect
I'll take 3
The UH-60 Blackhawk is a beautiful helicopter, I want it to remain operational for many more decades, and never need to be replaced from the useless defiant x.
I love when people that use “freedom” while promoting war and militarism while forgetting the military industrial complex
Feel free to move to a country that is outside the protective umbrella of that military industrial complex and the global supply chain that is maintained by it. You're correct that it has nothing to do with freedom. You're naïve however if you believe your safe, comfortable life is just granted to you. It's bought by men willing to to violence on your behalf.
I love it when men that understand strength is the only possible guarantor of peace stand up and deliver.
Freedom isn't "free". The cost of your freedom is the cost it takes to provide deterrence such that your adversaries (nation states with an opposing world view) won't take it away.
@@danielromerosol4158 It's pretty simple really. It's the reason you lock your doors at night or have a security system in your house. It's the reason we have police, lawyers, judges, and soldiers. A fundamental trait of humanity that never changes is that we lie, cheat, steal, and commit murder etc. The rule of law is what prevents complete chaos. The threat of punishment for breaking said laws is the deterrent. It's an imperfect system however it still begs the question? Who's rule of law do you want to follow? The rule of law that the west and its allies generally follow or that of rogue states or the opposing world view allied by China, Russia, Iran, North Korea etc? The lines in the sand of the geopolitical landscape were drawn a long time ago.
@@danielromerosol4158 Free to do whatever it is that we want to do. Without concern for what anyone outside our family and friends thinks about it. Like none of your business freedom. Like keeping at bay our vicious enemies that hate us and speak through your entitled voice to try to mock and shame us, the men and women that serve, that live And die protecting our most precious resources, safe and happy and thriving at home, namely our wives, daughters and mother's in that order, for God, family and country in that order. Love that, person of uncertain or unknown gender. If you are ever truly interested in a deep schooling on what it means to even be a Man, re-read this reply and simply pay attention.
Nothing against the aircraft. I think its pretty cool but I really am not a fan of these old military personnel, me it officers generals, or your average grunt pitching the product. Just screams like they've been paid. it's one thing to see a neutral party testing the aircraft and reviewing it... but it is another when the company itself have ex-military personnel doing the advert.
Arma 3 Modders, do your thing.
Bro.. all you need is some guy with a rpg or a igla and a guy on a technical with a dshka mounted to take defiant x down. That is if she can out run bullets and missiles at low level. Combat coefficient my rear end if you’ve got baddies armed with Iglas and Tunguskas it will be hell for the pilots to fly under fire, Vietnam all over again.
The war in UKR proves that rotary wing vulnerability to manpads has not improved since 1970. Too expensive to produce in numbers, too expensive to train and maintain, too vulnerable to fly near the enemy.
It's only function is to create employment so that congress members can get re-elected.
The transport role can be done with trucks for a fraction of the cost.
It's only real value is SAR. Tiltrotors can't do this because of vicious down draft.
Cool, it's a KA-52 Alligator 🐊 with a SubMaRiNe propeller. Now put ballast tanks and make it a submarine!
Don't think so! USA needs Valor, 280Valor, near 550km/h and 14 soldiers transport. It goes to law!
Add a 50mm cannon to it.
🇺🇸💪🇺🇸💪😎
🇺🇸🇺🇸
With more lift capability than conventional helicopters, an attack helicopter version of the Defiant X would be able to carry more and heavier armament than Apache.
It is also way larger than have more powerful engine than Apache so why not? The same can be carried by apache if they give them powerful engine.
Sorry V 220
Nice but why keep hiding anti gravity tech? A bit silly.
Like getting a Lamborghini to get groceries
The Black Hawk's younger Brother.
Another killing machine
Only problem is......V-280 does this too and better.
wait V-280 can do sharp turns?
Future Heli
Agent America USA ka define ka helicopter ko Bharat mein jarurat hai ismein jo system vagaira aadhunik hai iska vyavhar aur Bharat ko naye tarike se advance Banane mein bahut kam aaega iska behtarin ke liye aur Bharat mein advance technology ke liye isko bhi like kam se kam 500 ya 10 ka sanka mein Jarur laen
sue china if they copy ur designs
อันดับแรกเราต้องแก้ปัญหาโลกร้อนให้ได้ซะก่อนมันจะเป็นความมั่นคงด้านอาหารสังคมเศรษฐกิจจะมีความเสถียร
Islands is no word Isles is. 😕
I m pretty sure china will bring their defiant x called xi xi 25 in next few yrs. Lol. Lockheed needs to start work on next level of fighter.
Too bad it looks ugly. Just my opinion.
It is ugly
China is waiving... 🤣😂
Honestly looks like rpg bait
I'm just talking out of my ass, but I can't help but think they sound like paid endorsements...I hope that's not the case.
battlefield
WAR GAMES. FOOLITICKS. WAR GAMES. FOOLITICKS THEN REPEAT AGAIN... zzzZZZZZ 😴😴😴
I LOVE THE MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX!!!!! IS'NT GREAT! WHY WOULD I PUT MY MONEY ANYWHERE ELSE
Looks like shit
Design is terrible for the sheer size
Terrible seating for the oversized fuselage
This is why medium and heavy helicopters are separated
Wonder what company is paying these guys? Bell has the better option.
Still you gonna loss to Afghanistan