Chinese Copycat.? Bell's V-280 Valor and Boeing Sikorsky Defiant X Unveiled in Zhuhai Air Show WTF! th-cam.com/video/-bxH_eDpDJc/w-d-xo.html China: Sikorsky and Boeing Challenge Army Decision to Replace Black Hawk with Bell V-280 Tiltrotor th-cam.com/video/QML6r2x5vcc/w-d-xo.html
Chinese Copycat.? Bell's V-280 Valor and Boeing Sikorsky Defiant X Unveiled in Zhuhai Air Show WTF! th-cam.com/video/-bxH_eDpDJc/w-d-xo.html China: Sikorsky and Boeing Challenge Army Decision to Replace Black Hawk with Bell V-280 Tiltrotor th-cam.com/video/QML6r2x5vcc/w-d-xo.html
I'm happy to see helicopters finally using of the technoloty devoloped during the AH-56A Cheyenne program by Lockheed California Co. Curising speed 250, every day. Tow missiles, night visor, laser aiming, rockets, TOW milliles, helmet sightsm had to use P-51;s for chase planes. And this was back in the 70-80's. Berchmqn Ridhard Test pilot, Lockheed CA Co.
Btw for people unaware with the technology of coaxial rotors. Don’t be confused! I see a comment somebody compares it to a coaxial helo of the past. Like ka-52. This is a very different animal. To get the advantage of this system the two rotors have to be very close together. The ka-52 alig they have them spaces too far apart to benefit from what Sikorsky is doing on lag etc.
@@rdablock moreover it has rigid rotors, they had quite a few problems with them, cause rotors like this create a great deal of vibration, they even developed an active vibration mitigation system to cancel them.
Great accomplishment by the Sikorsky team. Additional props goes to the Bell Flight team too for the V-280. Many years of innovation, design and development.
I'm biased as I have a lot of experience with the UH 60 L helicopter, which to me was and still is one of the best if not thee best all around helicopter ever made, as it's versatility and maneuverability were second to none, and probably still are. I was sincerely hoping to see some more aggressive flying here, but leave disappointed 😞 The Blackhawk A and L models were field serviceable too, plus 10g crash worthiness... very important if you ask me. So, a major understanding indeed to replace the Blackhawk... I for one wish that the assembly line today had RAH 66s on it, yes the Comanche!! *and yes, I realize that does not replace the Blackhawk, but the RAH 66 was a very very impressive helicopter to see fly, and I always felt let down that we never got that aircraft into production even though we won the contract.
I've been thinking that too. If the army wants a helicopter replacement, I think this is it. But if they want superior range and speed, the V280 is going to come out ahead. I'd personally like to see them both go into service. I think the marines are for sure in favor of the tilt rotor.
I'd really like to see a demonstration of lowspeed precision, dead stop to full speed sideways to dead stop to backwards. That and a low altitude/high speed obstacle course (maybe unmanned for that one?).
I’ve seen a few clips of it. The most incredible thing about the low speed maneuverability is that it can actually pitch the nose down and reverse the pitch on the rear prop - essentially allowing you to “point” the nose down while remaining stationary, something I hadn’t even thought about till I first saw it. 😳
I think they should pick both, the V280 looks like a better long range troop/equipment transport and the Defiant looks more agile probably better suited as an attack aircraft.
Hi team defiant, please can i use a short extract of this video for a TH-cam video i am working on relating to the maximum forward speed of a helicopter. Of course the video will be credited to yourself. Thank you in advance , kind regards, Andrew
This is right next to my home, I seen this helicopter and the Comanche along time ago, I can often here helicopter way off in the distance in the woods...
Valor may have won the contract to replace the black hawk but I'm sure the defiant will still be produced in some number to meet other strategic and tactical needs of the army
This is interesting. The video is 2 years old now but I just saw a headline, so I looked it up on You tube. I wonder which helicopter it is supposed to replace, I have no idea. But this helicopter does look good. The speed is probably very good, which is think is part of the point of having the Co Axial type with a pusher prop. Also, because it is coax, I am certain that the stability is very good, and the lifting capacity should also be very good. It is also very large looking. As far as maneuverability sideways and backwards, I wouldn't know. But Coaxial machines are stable and rotor speed controls X axis rotation, so backwards flight should be just fine. Looks excellent.
It lost the contract against Bell's V-280 Valor, which is a tilt-rotor aircraft. It was supposed to be a replacement for the Blackhawk. Seeing it online doesn't do its actual size justice. I saw it in-person today, and it's huge. It's one of the fastest assault helicopters I believe, with a top speed of 247 knots, and that's because of the coaxial rotor system paired together with the pusher prop. Coaxial rotor systems are good for eliminating torque and letting a helicopter fly faster, but they're very big, heavy and require more complex/sophisticated mechanics to operate them. They're also not too good with vibrations and excessive flapping and whatnot, but I assume that there were obviously systems in-place to eliminate or reduce those two problems. Not too sure what you mean by "backwards flight," as literally every helicopter can fly backwards. I take it that you're saying that it can achieve high-speed flight whilst flying backwards, but I don't know anything about that.
@@RotatingBombWithADogOnIt There was someone else that made mention that they would be interested to know the difference between this helicopter and another that it is supposed to replace, or that it is direct competition with. They also said that the other helicopter is highly maneuverable. Or that it is very agile. I know that Coaxial helicopters are very stable. The counter rotating blades help create a more stable machine. The blades are designed to counteract each other, so there is no tail rotor needed to counteract torque created by the main rotor. Instead, the tail rotor that is in use creates forward thrust. So it does help to create a faster machine using that method. But I was contemplating the speed at which it could fly backwards or sideways. Obviously not as fast as forward flight, as the pusher prop only creates forward thrust. Moving sideways, the helicopters body has much more wind resistance. Moving backwards, as all helicopters can easily fly backwards is also where I wonder. I suspect it can fly backwards faster than sideways, but not as fast as forward flight. With model helicopters, which was a hobby of mine. I have flown Co-axial, and fully collective pitch or 3d type, which were Bell Hiller systems unless they are flybarless. The Full Collective machines are faster than Co-ax, but in models, the Co-Axials are meant for beginner pilots, and are not nearly as powerful as Full Pitch helicopters. Of course these are models and not the real thing, but the fundamental concepts are the same. Still, with the models, those Co Axials are meant for beginners, so they are not powerful machines. Full Sized models can have upwards of 15 HP with a machine that doesn't way more than 10LBS.
@@robertmoore119 Once again, coaxial rotor systems vibrate a lot. They're not as stable as you think they are. The other helicopter could go faster, fly longer, and I believe it was a bit smaller. It also had some really neat features on it.
@@RotatingBombWithADogOnIt The models are not the real thing, but they have the same fundamental concepts for operation. They are very stable. I couldn't think of an easier machine to fly. I have flown them myself. They are, as far as the models are concerned, the absolute easiest to fly. The stability they inherently have, is the reason for the ease of flight.
What kind of armament can this carry? TOW 2 would be deadly with this kind of maneuverability. Might be able to laser multiple targets and rapidly let the TOWs out while strafing sideway maintaining a safe distance from the target.
I get the whole speed thing, but it seems like the tilt rotor v-280 is going to have problems with tight landing zones.. But I'm sure they thought about it. This was my favorite to win.
Mine too, for the same reason, landing area and flying between buildings in an urban setting. I have a feeling this would have been less of a maintenance headache too but I have nothing to back that up other than gut instinct.
V280 probably won’t have any more trouble with landing zones than any of these other designs. It’s shorter and wider than more conventional helicopters, and including rotor diameters it’s roughly similar in footprint to the Black Hawk turned sideways
@@dylansmith5214 LZs arent up to the blades edges on the blackhawk... the valor only has a 19% larger footprint total and can fit in nearly every landing zone the blackhawk can by turning it 90 degrees.
I would have picked this one looks more survivable compared to the tilt osprey style. I can see the other one having one engine failure and becoming impossible to fly and land because you can’t auto gyrations down. Plus looks like this would be easier to train people on.
You are basing all of this on false info... 1. both engines turn both rotors in tilt rotors just like they do in the Chinook so losing 1 engine just means you lose 50% of the power. 2. yes tilt rotors can auto rotate. 3. the military already has tons of experience training tilt rotor pilots and it is easier for a helicopter pilot to learn a tilt rotor.
From Ihor Sikorsky a Ukrainian born aerospace engineer we have helicopters. Ukraine will be designing their own helicopter a composite one with 3 , 2800HP engines for a 14 tonne platform the coaxial Ukrainians will borrow from Lockheed martin and their involvement in designing the cockpit.
Chinese Copycat.? Bell's V-280 Valor and Boeing Sikorsky Defiant X Unveiled in Zhuhai Air Show WTF! th-cam.com/video/-bxH_eDpDJc/w-d-xo.html China: Sikorsky and Boeing Challenge Army Decision to Replace Black Hawk with Bell V-280 Tiltrotor th-cam.com/video/QML6r2x5vcc/w-d-xo.html
So this thing is almost Bugatti Chiron fast, might not sound that impressive but, unlike the Chiron, this thing can do that for hours not a few minutes! ;) 248 kts is 459 kph or 285 mph...
Probably some really weird rotor wash dynamics at high speeds - I noticed that too, I’m sure for stealth considerations they’d much rather NOT have those there lol.
@@MarkBarrett ... you are basing that on false info then. Each engine in a tilt rotor turns both rotors at all times so if one engine goes down it only loses half of its power. Just like the Chinook and Osprey.
Sweet by the time this makes it to production drones will have made it completely obsolete can’t wait…we’ll have squads of small drones that can fit/fly anywhere to zip in and pick up a downed pilot or wounded soldier and then buzz right out almost like a eagle diving in for its lunch and gone before you even knew it was there.
fvl is required to be capable of remote control or autonomous flight, and how would a totally unmanned drone actually give aid to a casualty? this aircraft could take off, navigate and get to the soldier and hover overhead while human medics actually retrieve the casualty and treat them.
Wow, very futuristic and the slim design of everything looks fantastic. Just wonder how long the military will take to get their hands on this piece of kit? And if it'll ever end up the arsenal of the Australian defence force. Mmmm. 🤔👍
"Operational footprint", was the key phrase here. The rotor diameter is pretty close if not exactly identical, and by the time you take into account a safety margin for the Blackhawks tail rotor, they will be about the same.
this looks like the maintenance hours will be atrocious not to mention the maintenance costs... that being said STOP WITH THE TILT ROTORS! Gawd those are the most disastrous frame in military history
don't forget there is an active vibration mitigation system that will also need maintenance. This thing is more complex and less tried and tested then V-280
You are simply wrong. You are believing every meme you see on the internet. Look up the facts and those facts say the Osprey of one of the safest rotorcraft the military flies.
I've been following this technology since the '80s and ABC. Absolutely awesome to see Defiant flying so well.
Do you support American Military? If yes you are party to murders committed by them around the world
Chinese Copycat.? Bell's V-280 Valor and Boeing Sikorsky Defiant X Unveiled in Zhuhai Air Show WTF! th-cam.com/video/-bxH_eDpDJc/w-d-xo.html
China: Sikorsky and Boeing Challenge Army Decision to Replace Black Hawk with Bell V-280 Tiltrotor th-cam.com/video/QML6r2x5vcc/w-d-xo.html
Hats off to all the team at Sikorsky!!!
Do you support American Military? If yes you are party to murders committed by them around the world
Chinese Copycat.? Bell's V-280 Valor and Boeing Sikorsky Defiant X Unveiled in Zhuhai Air Show WTF! th-cam.com/video/-bxH_eDpDJc/w-d-xo.html
China: Sikorsky and Boeing Challenge Army Decision to Replace Black Hawk with Bell V-280 Tiltrotor th-cam.com/video/QML6r2x5vcc/w-d-xo.html
Can it fly face down using tail as lift?
I love the design of this aircraft and it's my pick over tilt rotor technology competitors!
I prefer technology from the 1970's as well, long live the Cheyenne.
Why not put rotors undierneath?
@@Faust1169Pan spatial Dragonwing?
It looks big sitting next to the Blackhawk! Really amazing engineering!
Do you support American Military? If yes you are party to murders committed by them around the world
Epic music and editing to accompany this awesome project.
thanks for shearing Team DEFIANT
I'm happy to see helicopters finally using of the technoloty devoloped during the AH-56A Cheyenne program by Lockheed California Co. Curising speed 250, every day. Tow missiles, night visor, laser aiming, rockets, TOW milliles, helmet sightsm had to use P-51;s for chase planes. And this was back in the 70-80's. Berchmqn Ridhard Test pilot, Lockheed CA Co.
Do you support American Military? If yes you are party to murders committed by them around the world
That is such a beautiful aircraft. I love it.
Btw for people unaware with the technology of coaxial rotors. Don’t be confused! I see a comment somebody compares it to a coaxial helo of the past. Like ka-52. This is a very different animal. To get the advantage of this system the two rotors have to be very close together. The ka-52 alig they have them spaces too far apart to benefit from what Sikorsky is doing on lag etc.
it's less about being coaxial than it is a COMPOUND helicopter - the main rotors go "limp" beyond a certain speed, flying like a gyrocopter
@@rdablock moreover it has rigid rotors, they had quite a few problems with them, cause rotors like this create a great deal of vibration, they even developed an active vibration mitigation system to cancel them.
Правильно Ка 52 это сооснокоптер а то что на этом видео это гирокоптер
Flies like a dream! Can't wait to see more!
Great accomplishment by the Sikorsky team. Additional props goes to the Bell Flight team too for the V-280. Many years of innovation, design and development.
Amazing work by the Defiant team!
That's got to be the best helicopter I have ever seen. The development team has done a fantastic job
The Army should award the helicopter contract to the Lockheed Martin-Boeing team.
I know *I* would! 😁
are you a bot? no offense but you really sound like a bot
Cool Machine ❤
Seems like they made a good machine but the valor seems so implemented and #’s out the box are good. The range is really good.
If you support US military you are party to the murders of humans committed by them around the world
This copter is on another level. design is on point
I'm biased as I have a lot of experience with the UH 60 L helicopter, which to me was and still is one of the best if not thee best all around helicopter ever made, as it's versatility and maneuverability were second to none, and probably still are.
I was sincerely hoping to see some more aggressive flying here, but leave disappointed 😞
The Blackhawk A and L models were field serviceable too, plus 10g crash worthiness... very important if you ask me.
So, a major understanding indeed to replace the Blackhawk...
I for one wish that the assembly line today had RAH 66s on it, yes the Comanche!!
*and yes, I realize that does not replace the Blackhawk, but the RAH 66 was a very very impressive helicopter to see fly, and I always felt let down that we never got that aircraft into production even though we won the contract.
What's your view on the v 280?
Damn, I love the design
That's amazing !
This should be the winner.
I've been thinking that too. If the army wants a helicopter replacement, I think this is it. But if they want superior range and speed, the V280 is going to come out ahead. I'd personally like to see them both go into service. I think the marines are for sure in favor of the tilt rotor.
The Army has a habit of starting and cancelling helicopter programs.
If it was up to, I'd spend my tax money on hookers than the army. Did George Bush find his WMDs?
That thing is gorgeous!
So they can't start a and stop the rear blades mid flight?
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
STABILITY & SPEED BADGE
CONGRATS YOU WIN.!!! 👏👏👏
Incredible. A winner.
Nope...
@@SuperGeronimo999 Yeah, just read it. A fucking disaster. Another Osprey quagmire. Good luck landing around trees. LOL.
@@zackthebongripper7274 you do not know more than the U.S. military lmfao.
@@zackthebongripper7274 You are a fool who trusts everything they see online... the Osprey is one of the safest rotorcraft the military uses.
I'm Happy to see
Looks like an RC helicopter. Very impressive as the real deal. Will pair nicely with the V-22 Osprey
Or the V-280 Valor
V22 osprey is a garbage aircraft that will continue to kill servicemen
Do you support American Military? If yes you are party to murders committed by them around the world
@@KG-ve9xf bot?
@@ελευθερία-ε2ο your mother's paramour
I'd really like to see a demonstration of lowspeed precision, dead stop to full speed sideways to dead stop to backwards. That and a low altitude/high speed obstacle course (maybe unmanned for that one?).
I’ve seen a few clips of it. The most incredible thing about the low speed maneuverability is that it can actually pitch the nose down and reverse the pitch on the rear prop - essentially allowing you to “point” the nose down while remaining stationary, something I hadn’t even thought about till I first saw it. 😳
YES!
What now? Are foreign/civilian contracts allowed?
I think they should pick both, the V280 looks like a better long range troop/equipment transport and the Defiant looks more agile probably better suited as an attack aircraft.
is that big thing a replacement for the Blackhawk or Chinook? It looks quite large.
this prototype got beat by the V-280 Valor for the possible blackhawk replacement.
Now that the Defiant lost the competition for the U.S. Army contract, is it dead, or does it have a chance of getting a contract overseas?
does it transition into a more gyrocopter-like flight profile when in fast forward flight?
sb1 defiant👍
너무좋다“!
우리 특공대에 배치해서 전용팀으로 활용하면 좋겠다”!
특히, 707 특공대에~~~~!
Beautiful 👍🏻🇺🇸
4:06 there is a place called GAYLORD?
Hi team defiant, please can i use a short extract of this video for a TH-cam video i am working on relating to the maximum forward speed of a helicopter. Of course the video will be credited to yourself. Thank you in advance , kind regards, Andrew
This is right next to my home, I seen this helicopter and the Comanche along time ago, I can often here helicopter way off in the distance in the woods...
Poetry in motion
What are the new under cockpit strakes for?
Why not keep the name 'Sky Raider' S-97?
Valor may have won the contract to replace the black hawk but I'm sure the defiant will still be produced in some number to meet other strategic and tactical needs of the army
Cool ride!!
Amazing👍
They should genuinely be getting the newest contract, especially for something to replace the Osprey
This is interesting. The video is 2 years old now but I just saw a headline, so I looked it up on You tube. I wonder which helicopter it is supposed to replace, I have no idea. But this helicopter does look good. The speed is probably very good, which is think is part of the point of having the Co Axial type with a pusher prop. Also, because it is coax, I am certain that the stability is very good, and the lifting capacity should also be very good. It is also very large looking. As far as maneuverability sideways and backwards, I wouldn't know. But Coaxial machines are stable and rotor speed controls X axis rotation, so backwards flight should be just fine. Looks excellent.
It lost the contract against Bell's V-280 Valor, which is a tilt-rotor aircraft. It was supposed to be a replacement for the Blackhawk. Seeing it online doesn't do its actual size justice. I saw it in-person today, and it's huge. It's one of the fastest assault helicopters I believe, with a top speed of 247 knots, and that's because of the coaxial rotor system paired together with the pusher prop. Coaxial rotor systems are good for eliminating torque and letting a helicopter fly faster, but they're very big, heavy and require more complex/sophisticated mechanics to operate them. They're also not too good with vibrations and excessive flapping and whatnot, but I assume that there were obviously systems in-place to eliminate or reduce those two problems. Not too sure what you mean by "backwards flight," as literally every helicopter can fly backwards. I take it that you're saying that it can achieve high-speed flight whilst flying backwards, but I don't know anything about that.
@@RotatingBombWithADogOnIt There was someone else that made mention that they would be interested to know the difference between this helicopter and another that it is supposed to replace, or that it is direct competition with. They also said that the other helicopter is highly maneuverable. Or that it is very agile.
I know that Coaxial helicopters are very stable. The counter rotating blades help create a more stable machine. The blades are designed to counteract each other, so there is no tail rotor needed to counteract torque created by the main rotor.
Instead, the tail rotor that is in use creates forward thrust. So it does help to create a faster machine using that method. But I was contemplating the speed at which it could fly backwards or sideways. Obviously not as fast as forward flight, as the pusher prop only creates forward thrust. Moving sideways, the helicopters body has much more wind resistance. Moving backwards, as all helicopters can easily fly backwards is also where I wonder.
I suspect it can fly backwards faster than sideways, but not as fast as forward flight.
With model helicopters, which was a hobby of mine. I have flown Co-axial, and fully collective pitch or 3d type, which were Bell Hiller systems unless they are flybarless. The Full Collective machines are faster than Co-ax, but in models, the Co-Axials are meant for beginner pilots, and are not nearly as powerful as Full Pitch helicopters. Of course these are models and not the real thing, but the fundamental concepts are the same. Still, with the models, those Co Axials are meant for beginners, so they are not powerful machines. Full Sized models can have upwards of 15 HP with a machine that doesn't way more than 10LBS.
@@robertmoore119 Once again, coaxial rotor systems vibrate a lot. They're not as stable as you think they are. The other helicopter could go faster, fly longer, and I believe it was a bit smaller. It also had some really neat features on it.
@@RotatingBombWithADogOnIt The models are not the real thing, but they have the same fundamental concepts for operation. They are very stable. I couldn't think of an easier machine to fly. I have flown them myself. They are, as far as the models are concerned, the absolute easiest to fly. The stability they inherently have, is the reason for the ease of flight.
The defiant is cool but the interior space is limited for such a big vehicle. As opposed to the valor.
Aaaand Valor it is.
This looks stealthier & agile than the Bell, but Bell took the award..wonder why
It seems like the V280 is faster, has better range, and is a more mature platform
Wasn't this program cancelled ???
Still the BEST! Sikorsky Aurcraft. 🇺🇸👍🇺🇸💪🇺🇸
What a beautiful ship? The perfect successor to the Black Hawk...
If you support US military you are party to the murders of humans committed by them around the world.
@@KG-ve9xf Thanks for the stupid comment. Please tell me you live in Europe?
@@fretsward2225 how is it useless, it's the truth. How can you be such an insensitive murderer
@@KG-ve9xf That's akin to asking me if you look good in your new dress?
What kind of armament can this carry? TOW 2 would be deadly with this kind of maneuverability. Might be able to laser multiple targets and rapidly let the TOWs out while strafing sideway maintaining a safe distance from the target.
one damn good looking bird
А в км/ч сколько?
425
The valor won which has 565 km/h max speed.
Very nice
Top!
Greetings from Berlin, Capital of Germany
I get the whole speed thing, but it seems like the tilt rotor v-280 is going to have problems with tight landing zones.. But I'm sure they thought about it. This was my favorite to win.
Mine too, for the same reason, landing area and flying between buildings in an urban setting. I have a feeling this would have been less of a maintenance headache too but I have nothing to back that up other than gut instinct.
If you support US military you are party to the murders of humans committed by them around the world
V280 probably won’t have any more trouble with landing zones than any of these other designs. It’s shorter and wider than more conventional helicopters, and including rotor diameters it’s roughly similar in footprint to the Black Hawk turned sideways
Wow!
Would this be a replacement for the Blackhawk?
Yes.
Eventually, at least that's what it's being designed to do.
Nothing will ever replace the Blackhawk which has become the A-10 of helicopters.
No weapons tests?
A mock up version should be offered to the civilian market
Saludos desde Uruguay 💪😁👍
This is probably good as a dedicated attack aircraft much like the apache
Do you support American Military? If yes you are party to murders committed by them around the world
4:08 so much bigger than a blackhawk
An amazing helicopter
he supports Israelis who kill unarmed humans every year, this year Israel killed 2301 humans including 243 children
@@KG-ve9xf What are you talking about?
*America
@@KG-ve9xf If you're going to delete comments, don't post them.
The kobie skin
I was hoping this would be produced just so I could look at it. 🙂
Nice craft, but the V-280 was the best call between the two.
Yeah but how are going to land the v280 in tight space
@@dylansmith5214 LZs arent up to the blades edges on the blackhawk... the valor only has a 19% larger footprint total and can fit in nearly every landing zone the blackhawk can by turning it 90 degrees.
I would have picked this one looks more survivable compared to the tilt osprey style. I can see the other one having one engine failure and becoming impossible to fly and land because you can’t auto gyrations down. Plus looks like this would be easier to train people on.
You are basing all of this on false info... 1. both engines turn both rotors in tilt rotors just like they do in the Chinook so losing 1 engine just means you lose 50% of the power. 2. yes tilt rotors can auto rotate. 3. the military already has tons of experience training tilt rotor pilots and it is easier for a helicopter pilot to learn a tilt rotor.
Green light to go on a mission!
Esse é o mais top do mundo
From Ihor Sikorsky a Ukrainian born aerospace engineer we have helicopters. Ukraine will be designing their own helicopter a composite one with 3 , 2800HP engines for a 14 tonne platform the coaxial Ukrainians will borrow from Lockheed martin and their involvement in designing the cockpit.
👍💪💪
How much downpayment & monthy?
This would make Awesome POTUS - Marine One Helicopter! 👍👍
Its what else it can do that they arent showing us🤔
Looks like a handy bit of kit tho👍
Just add a few rocket pods and paint the belly white. It’s time for a Airwolf movie. 🐺
Damn right! 😁👍
Суперский вертолёт , как ка52 !!!
Chinese Copycat.? Bell's V-280 Valor and Boeing Sikorsky Defiant X Unveiled in Zhuhai Air Show WTF! th-cam.com/video/-bxH_eDpDJc/w-d-xo.html
China: Sikorsky and Boeing Challenge Army Decision to Replace Black Hawk with Bell V-280 Tiltrotor th-cam.com/video/QML6r2x5vcc/w-d-xo.html
the American spy among the Kamovs 😂😂😂
Is is bullet proof?
Yes, it's also stealth and can fly in space.
I think navy will like it ❤
I'm going to remain seated for a while longer.
the child of thropters has born
So this thing is almost Bugatti Chiron fast, might not sound that impressive but, unlike the Chiron, this thing can do that for hours not a few minutes! ;)
248 kts is 459 kph or 285 mph...
Probably some really weird rotor wash dynamics at high speeds - I noticed that too, I’m sure for stealth considerations they’d much rather NOT have those there lol.
I'm rooting for Defiant to be the next successor for Blackhawk
same!
I Like the idea of VTOL, the blades seem a little chunky
Aaaand not going to happen.
Unfortunately the V-280 of Bell won the competition for future long range assault aircraft of US Army..
Sorry bro, Im coming from the future. V-280 is going to be the winner of this competition. Dont get sad anyway!🙂🙏
Need NO MUSIC version.
Sikorsky raider
The Defiant is better than the original Black Hawk.
I'll say that much.
The system will work well.
I've been skeptical of the tilt rotors, for if there is a rotor failure. Otherwise, a tilt-rotor would be faster.
@@MarkBarrett ... you are basing that on false info then. Each engine in a tilt rotor turns both rotors at all times so if one engine goes down it only loses half of its power. Just like the Chinook and Osprey.
@@n3v3rforgott3n9 The Osprey doesn't.
The new smaller V-280 tilt-rotor does.
@@MarkBarrett My guy, yes the Osprey has that very same mechanic built into it... google it.
Sweet by the time this makes it to production drones will have made it completely obsolete can’t wait…we’ll have squads of small drones that can fit/fly anywhere to zip in and pick up a downed pilot or wounded soldier and then buzz right out almost like a eagle diving in for its lunch and gone before you even knew it was there.
Rotorcraft will never be obsolete. Lol
@@dpedd12 ok ok “much less effective in a modern battle against non 3rd world countries” I should say
Will that drone help with a catastrophic bleed and check the pilots CABC before transport and then administer meds en-route?
Wow I can’t wait
@@OverlandTT lmao, people do be thinking AI will be that advanced eh?
fvl is required to be capable of remote control or autonomous flight, and how would a totally unmanned drone actually give aid to a casualty? this aircraft could take off, navigate and get to the soldier and hover overhead while human medics actually retrieve the casualty and treat them.
So,
I guess all those callers to Art Bell were on to something?
It looks like a submarine to me with pusher proppellers on the back ill name it flying submarinecopter🤣🤣🤣
Holy cow, another level for an English guy.
You know, Angry Cops was right, it does *kinda* look like one of those rc helicopters in terms of dual rotors and the tail rotor.
Wow, very futuristic and the slim design of everything looks fantastic. Just wonder how long the military will take to get their hands on this piece of kit? And if it'll ever end up the arsenal of the Australian defence force. Mmmm. 🤔👍
It won't get their hands on it at all.
@@SuperGeronimo999 why do you say this?
@@andrewparrott7260 because they have give with the v 280
@@andrewparrott7260 Because it lost the competition with the Bell Valor, which will be bought instead.
@@SuperGeronimo999 ahh ok. 👍
🔝
Cool video, less music though please.
Sorry, but I don't see much Bell in it
I'm a Bell fan from my youth. But yes time marches on. Though I'm still a big fan of the tilt rotor
It really dwarfs the Blackhawk.
I had to rewind and make sure that was a Blackhawk lol, I didn’t really have a good sense of scale till then.
"Operational footprint", was the key phrase here. The rotor diameter is pretty close if not exactly identical, and by the time you take into account a safety margin for the Blackhawks tail rotor, they will be about the same.
The rotor diameter looks about the same but the fuselage is longer and wider. More room for cargo and troops.
this looks like the maintenance hours will be atrocious not to mention the maintenance costs... that being said STOP WITH THE TILT ROTORS! Gawd those are the most disastrous frame in military history
don't forget there is an active vibration mitigation system that will also need maintenance. This thing is more complex and less tried and tested then V-280
You are simply wrong. You are believing every meme you see on the internet. Look up the facts and those facts say the Osprey of one of the safest rotorcraft the military flies.