Valved or valveless chromatic harmonicas? Seydel Deluxe Steel Vs Easttop Forerunner

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 ก.พ. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 23

  • @milevasiljevic9312
    @milevasiljevic9312 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Bravo Per, kako ti zavidim na svim harmonikama koje koristiš.

  • @markieproductions22
    @markieproductions22 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The Sydel sounds slightly better but ‘m not sure it’s worth 30 times more. I believe the valveless on is a bit more durable and less costly to maintain. If the valves go down, they are fairly expensive to replace. I’ve not played either type but have held the latest Easttop valveless and it felt like a quality build as does their diatonic T0008.

  • @brownsauce30
    @brownsauce30 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great site, just found you. Great❤😊

  • @wendellguy
    @wendellguy 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    A bit thinner is an understatement. The difference would be a lot more pronounced in other circumstances....

    • @norfolknwhey4787
      @norfolknwhey4787 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The Easttop actually cuts better in the mix when played amplified. I use it frequently for busking and live shows and play a 270 for recording.

    • @woelneberg
      @woelneberg  10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I agree, it's a distinct difference. At least to my perception as a player. Have you tried them yourself?

    • @woelneberg
      @woelneberg  10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's interesting. I rarely play amplified and haven't taken the Forerunner through a PA. What kind of music do you play when busking?

  • @miamistomp
    @miamistomp 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Easttop is just fine

    • @woelneberg
      @woelneberg  10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They make some decent harmonicas at a low price. Which one is your favorite?

  • @wendellguy
    @wendellguy 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    300 Euros for a Seydel deluxe? Never liked em much, but at the price you quote you could buy a Sirius 56 for less....

    • @woelneberg
      @woelneberg  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I Never tried Suzuki chroms because I don't get a long with their diatonics. I don't think 300€ is bad for a harmonica this good. It has quickly become my favorite and that says a lot, because it competes against some pretty expensive companions 😂

  • @bilbowaggins3036
    @bilbowaggins3036 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I think the best sounding valveless chromatic out there right now is the seydel nonslider. It is much, much netter sounding than the foreruner, but obviously different since it has no slide

    • @woelneberg
      @woelneberg  10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I haven't tried the nonslider as I am quite fond of my button, but Seydel certainly are reliable! Have you played the nonslider for long?

    • @TheRatBoyBoy
      @TheRatBoyBoy 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      depending on the key, not all nonsliders are fully valveless

    • @bilbowaggins3036
      @bilbowaggins3036 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@TheRatBoyBoy true, bit C, which most play, is valveless. Anyways, I'm a bigger fan of JDR's trochilus now, which is essentially a 10 hole valveless chronatic (if you buy the solo tuned version) it's tone is far superior to the forerunner in my opinion

  • @AsadAli-jc5tg
    @AsadAli-jc5tg 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Man it was a biased review! You were clearly boxing with the poor Forerunner's slide to make it sound. It has quite a quiet slide. Yes, there's a difference but it's like 5-7% not ten times as the price difference between the two is.

    • @woelneberg
      @woelneberg  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      It was not intentional, the slide on the Seydel is a lot stiffer so transitioning between them like that doesn't feel natural. I probably transferred the muscle memory from the Seydel to the Forerunner. I can post a side by side comparison with slide noise if you would like?

  • @Raj-ym4cu
    @Raj-ym4cu 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This was helpful, thank you! I need to wrap my head around this now. Am only interested in the implications as far as bending is concerned. Lot of conflicting info on the internet about bending on chromatics. Some say you can bend only on draw notes, some say both draw and blow. Some say you can bend only a semi-tone, some say you can bend a full tone. And then theres valved vs valveless. You are saying valved has more bending potential. Okay 🤔

    • @woelneberg
      @woelneberg  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Valved can bend on draw and blow notes. Some are able to bend several semitones, but that's not something I am familiar with. I only bend for expressive effect on valved.
      If you are curious you can always make some valves at home and try on one hole on a diatonic to test it?

  • @praveensinha6154
    @praveensinha6154 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What's the tyk tuk sound with slider in forerunner

  • @hishighnessab5540
    @hishighnessab5540 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Recently got a Forerunner 2 aftr reading spme rave reviews about its "valveless virtues". But i found it to be very unreliable. Inspite of having no valves it continually keeps choking up at one note or other and suddenly i find my self struggling to get the sound out if the instrument !!! .., big mistake to buy the Forerunner 2!

    • @woelneberg
      @woelneberg  หลายเดือนก่อน

      What a shame! I am sorry you got a bad sample!

  • @Raj-ym4cu
    @Raj-ym4cu 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This was helpful, thank you! I need to wrap my head around this now. Am only interested in the implications as far as bending is concerned. Lot of conflicting info on the internet about bending on chromatics. Some say you can bend only on draw notes, some say both draw and blow. Some say you can bend only a semi-tone, some say you can bend a full tone. And then theres valved vs valveless. You are saying valved has more bending potential. Okay 🤔