Anyone who defends the fed's escalation at Waco shouldn't be considered. Period. I get the later half of the timeline is convoluted, but they drove a *tank* through the wall. A military tank, to bust someone for weapon charges.
There is no way in hell that they'll be able to confiscate our guns, NO WAY. What they'll do is ban the sales of AR-15's, other similar rifles and high capacity magazines. New York has already done away with 30 round magazines, but thank God for New Hampshire which is just a 2 hour drive away!! Semper Fi!!
In the fiscal year, 2020, ATF had 5082 employees. Of those, 2653 were special agents. If American gun owners allow 2653 bureaucrats to disarm us, we deserve everything that happens after that.
@@alwaysopen7970 prohibition.....but I don't know if the atf is that old though. Maybe there used to be a problem with illegal non taxed sale of tobacco or something. Plus there are legal issues surrounding tobacco you have to be 21 to smoke it but they're not gonna send the ATF to Casey's To investigate the 16 year old that bought a pack of Pall malls
Or to put it another way, read it in light of when it was written. The meaning of words change, but the left insists on reading it in a modern context when it suits them. Take the definition of "militia", for example.
@@jameskaraganis2569 I have to disagree.... the meaning of words never changes. Only the perception vs the intent. We know the context in which the constitution was intended for.... only now have people chosen to perceive it differently. The foresight of the founders to anticipate this is exactly why it was written. That was their intention. It’s not hard to perceive the why and how it was written today more than ever.
@@hailtothe_rooster1572 I have to disagree. The meaning of words changes constantly over time, that is the nature of language. I'm not certain why you think otherwise.
@@jameskaraganis2569 Let’s take the first for example Freedom of speech... are you telling me the meaning of speech in 2021 has changed to mean “only what someone wants to hear” OR does it still mean expression of thoughts and feelings How about the big three? Life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness. How have the meaning of those ever changed?
@@user-gu1hl2kx2k ha no. This might just be the most unpopular president in history. And his Vice President was the most unpopular candidate when she was in the running. This election showed us that they can do whatever they want. If Bernie got the Democratic nomination, I might actually believe he could’ve beat trump. But Biden? No way man. Dude can’t even put a coherent sentence together.
He said that an assault weapon is what Congress defines it as. That is the right answer. He shouldn’t be enforcing his opinions, just the laws as written. I don’t like the guy and I don’t like his views, but this was the right answer. It’s not the job of the ATF director to decide what an “assault weapon” is, or to enforce their opinion on the subject.
@@CutlassOutdoors I agree that he shouldn't enforce his opinions IFF he gets the job. But he is not in the job yet and they were asking his opinion to deduce his suitability for the position. Also it is a a double edged sword, as IFF he gets the job Congress will often defer to him/her to make recommendations as to how Congress should define it.
@@samhouston5217 that’s a good point. Still, I think his point that the director of the ATF doesn’t get to make policy, just enforce it, was intentionally misunderstood by most.
I wonder if he realized the irony when the Senator asked him what he owns and he said "that's a pretty private question." No shit, fuck stick. Now you know how the rest of us feel.
Given his history and his participation in the slaughter of women and children, I’d say the word is not indifference, but outright malice and contempt.
This guy was personal involved with boots on the ground for Ruby Ridge, Waco, and Fast & Furious gun running. To me he should probably be in Jail not leading the ATF.
Throw out the GCA while we are at it... and if we really get on a roll let's ditch the IRS and federal reserve. We do all that and we just might get a free country back!!
"I'm a gun owner myself" is like the Fudd motto. It's always thrown out there as some way to justify restricting 2A rights. This guy just makes my skin crawl every time I hear him talk.
I'm a new gun owner and I dont understand the term "Fudd." I think of that term as something that means an oldschool shooter who doesnt use guns that have magazines. Do I have that right?
Could you imagine how people would react if a gun owner said "I would love to arrest, jail or eliminate members of government *before* they can violate the Constitution"?
@@kevinsaltz7849 I swear this guy says thank you no matter how aggressive the question then he starts talking about Dr. pepper for Ted Cruz??? WHO IS THIS GUY looool
He knows he has the same firearm he's trying to ban for everyone else. He should be required to disclose all of his privately owned assets to the public to highlight the hypocrisy.
I love how when kennedy asked him what guns he owned is said that it was a personal question, which was true, the problem what chippman kept inserting his personal interests when stating that he himself was a gun owner. I'd like to know if he owns any ar-15's and if theyll be registered or surrended under his amended nfa rules... im gonna guess not, he's special after all.
Typical of a Maoist, Stalinist, Nazi, fascist, communist, or any other totalitarian. They all view the people as livestock to be managed, not as the ultimate authority of government.
I'll bet he owns a double barrel shotgun! "When I heard Joementia tell "parents" magazine buy a shotgun, I took that advice. He's such an intelligent guy and considering he's had personal security for decades he's very much in touch with the finer points of defending his home and loved ones! Thanks Joementia! And thank you for the nomination to direct the AFT!"
Chipman says that congress will decide the definition of an assault weapon...but then congress, bc they know nothing about firearms, delegates that duty to the ATF. So Chipman then decides anyway.
@@TheNotSoGoodGamer007 you really think the feds give a flying fuck about some online petition unless it suits their own agenda?! That is a good fucking joke bro.
Yup. They were created for the purpose of prohibition and that was proven to be a failure just like the war on drugs. This agency should have been dissolved a long time ago. We don’t need or want an illegitimate illegal agency who’s focus is restricting fundamental constitutionally guaranteed civil rights. This is an absurd agency. And the fact that this creepy crooked mouth creep was part of the Waco MURDERS is just absolutely absurd. They don’t really take this guy seriously. This is a test. This is them insulting us all. If this man is appointed director of that department....idk how much more absurd it can get. Joe Biden the klan connected so called party of prosperity? I mean wholly jumpin shit balls I feel like someone dosed me with acid or something and I just don’t know it yet
If they want to come to my crib and infringe on my rights, they’ll regret that shit for the rest of the time they live on this planet. We have inalienable rights, and mine aren’t budging while I’m alive.
Well we already have vaccinated morons still wearing masks. Next thing you know we will have women who have had hysterectomies wanting to take birth control too.
They should've asked him: "What does 'shall not be infringed' mean to you?" And then just watched him squirm. This is what happens when you give the government the authority to keep itself in check. It does not.
He killed many but he's worried about us killing someone... They just wanted to disarm us so they can kill us government has never disarmed any group of people for the better of those people we might as well go to war and head straight for government
"The AR-15 is the gun I was issued on the ATF SWAT team" There's not a single federal agency that issues AR-15's to their agents. If they are issued a rifle, it's a variant of the M4. Not the same semi-automatic rifle the public has access to.
An m4 is an ar15 and vice versa. only thing that makes it an m4 is a 13.7" barrel and shorter gas system. Military versions have select fire and full auto.
He probably owns all kinds of "assault weapons" and thinks you shouldn't. Just like every prospective tyrant, he's all about "rules for thee but not for me."
Nothing wrong with a Hi-Point, BEST GUARANTEE IN THE BUSINESS & DAMN NEAR INDESTRUCTIBLE. If you have never owned one, don't shit on them. The pistols are heavy & feel like a brick but their VERY RELIABLE, CHEAP & ACCURATE. Used as a house gun or truck gun IMHO, but would never carry one, very heavy. Their rifles are VERY VERY GOOD, NOTHING CAN TOUCH THEM ON PRICE OR THEIR GAUNANTEE, ALSO ACCURATE.
We need to continually ask questions like, "Where in the Constitution does the federal government get the authority for this organization?" The answer is, for almost every alphabet soup agency, "Nowhere does the Constitution give the federal government give them this authority."
@@plinyvicgames the fundamental issue here is that he shouldn’t have to think of an answer (one that is likely bs anyway). Someone facing an appointment for such a powerful position should rule with objectivity and not their HEAVILY politicized opinion/activism.
Him and Biden mock the constitution on almost a weekly basis. They swor to defend the constitution when they were sworn into office which means they committed perjury therefore they should be arrested for committing a crime.
@@johnspearance4072 so do every law enforcement agency and they enforce unconstitutional laws. Any gun law is unconstitutional and should not be enforced or followed by any true American.
Kennedy has him on the ropes but let him get away. Dude just said affirmatively he supports banning assault weapons. All you have to ask is “what exactly were you imagining as an assault weapon just now when you said you support banning them, regardless of how congress may one day define them?”
They're saying it wasn't him, apparently he didn't report to Waco until May 1993, which is after the 51 day seige had concluded. It wouldn't have surprised me if it had been true, because he's a complete moron, but it's still important to do our do diligence so it doesn't fall back on us
If the government is dead set on disarming it’s citizens it is because they intend to do something to them that they know the citizens will shoot them for.
Chipman said in a private meeting with Cruz that the data on the AWB is mixed. He is clearly referencing the data as an aggregate. Crus makes a vague reference to a paper without providing the title, publication, or authors of the paper. No one can for sure know which study Cruz is talking about because he didn't tell us. I don't understand how you could have been confused by this exchange. There are plenty of other things of substance to focus on in this hearing.
@Based F The image that is currently making the rounds through social media is not of Chipman. Chipman arrived in Waco a couple weeks later in the post investigation team. Even it were him it is irrelevant to this particular post. This post is attempting to catch him in a lie that he didn't commit. Bringing in other unrelated things is the definition of a red herring. I don't particularly like the guy either but the conservative message is being drowned out by screams of lunacy, conspiracies, and lies. The Republican party claims to be the party of reason but nothing on any of these videos even resembles rational discord.
That is because it is the job of congress to define what an assault weapon is when the law is created. We currently have no federal laws that define an assault weapon so he referred to a program within the ATF that defined an assault weapon as a rifle chambered larger than .22 and has a detachable magazine. He shouldn't have even brought that up and instead just pointed out that the term is a new category of firearm that is defined however congress wishes it to be defined if they pass a gun ban.
This does make a good point,... Who need to be creating definitions or weapons? ATF or congress. Several years ago a similar argument was made about the courts ruling on monopolies of dot coms. The point being they had no business DEFINING and ruling on that stuff. This is the same problem with gun definitions. Congress does not posess the techincical expertise to define what is or isn't. ATF should do that.
@@BabyCharlotteschannel this is true. But it wouldn’t matter. Anyone in any position of any philosophy involved in any behavior in this regime is by definition a dictator’s lieutenant. This government has absolutely no legitimacy whatsoever and so it really does not matter Who occupies that position: they have no more authority than the person who appointed them or the people who confirm them because Neither of them have any legitimate authority to appoint or confirm anyone.
@@justinrichard4005 Assault Weapon is a fear mongering political platform just like Sex Offender and Drug Dealer. The end goal is universal registration and control.
There is no such thing as a defensive weapon, there are defensive tactics or counter assaults. It's deterrent through superior firepower. Armor and position is defensive. Weapons are offense and the best defence is a good offense. Shotguns are great assault weapons. The problem is liberals are not "intellectual" enough to see that the term assault weapon is two terms. There is the action and the noun. Assault is the action or an intransitive verb, and weapon is the noun, and what you are using to assist in the action. A fork can be an assault weapon.
not even bingo night! This fella needs to be put in a padded room with heavy meds. Anybody that takes a photo around charred dead children they just murdered, Need to be locked away for good!
My favorite line is when Kennedy asks him “what do you own by the way?” Chipman replies (with a smile) “That’s a pretty private question.” Is that right?
@@YooToobz Nah, the best part is how he puts a claim out there to the public in order to give himself credibility, but refuses to actually supply any information to support said claim
Senator - “What do you own?” David Chipman “ that’s a pretty private question” Isn’t Chipman trying to get us gun owner’s to TELL them every gun we have? Seems pretty ironic to me. 🤷🏼♂️
That was hilarious! That's a private question and like you said they want to know what we have! Here California they do a background check every time you buy ammo, I mean every time so they even know how much ammo you possibly have. However, this butt plug wouldn't answer the question 🤔. POS floating in a toilet!!!
Thank you for asking me about that turd in the sink, I really feel like people have jumped to some crazy conclusions about that and thanks for letting me explain my understanding of the turd. That particular turd, well, I was in the bathroom that afternoon, but as a hall monitor. My position as a student and a hall monitor are different as you understand. And as a hall monitor I did see that turd but was unaware of whose turd that may have been. As an advocate, I am against pooping in the sink. But as a student if there are not clear signs posted against pooping in sinks I could see how one might be confused and make that mistake. Again thanks for asking.
🤣🤣🤣 you are so right. I can't get over his mouth. The last time I saw a mouth like that it had a hook in it. And his ears geez he can almost take flight.
"we hate guns!" Also them: has 24 Hour Armed Security Edit: im a Filipino which gun control here in the Philippines is strict yet useless gun violence still exist to both cops and criminals
Did he get offended and say "That's a pretty private question" when he asked him what guns he owns? But we will have to list all of the guns we own in a registry?
“For those who do not understand “rights” we need to make it clear once and for all. The Second Amendment does not apply to semi-automatic rifles, nor does it apply to bolt action rifles, nor pistols, nor revolvers. The Second Amendment RESTRICTS GOVERNMENT. The technology of the firearm is irrelevant. The restrictions on government remain the same, regardless of the firearm. The Second Amendment was not written to grant permission for citizens to own and bear arms. It forbids the government to interfere with the right to keep and bear arms. “The right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed. “ This also applies to other “rights”. They are not granted, they stipulate inherit rights that the government may not prohibit. “
Time to start defund all 3 letter agency,and give any employee 2 months to start scheduling a interviews for new employment in a new agency. Defund them all they hate America!
No movies like that are predictive programming that the government is involved in and name dropping it here and now is not a coincidence. This will come to pass.
The thing that made me laugh was when he was talking about lying on the form to get the firearm is 5 years. How is that Hunter Biden prosecution going?
"Thank you for that recommendation senator, I think it would be a great idea if guns ate belts instead of bullets. Joementia mentioned that to me himself the other night while we were watching "Matlock" from 5-6pm. After which he went night night."
Senator: "What kind of gun do you have?" Chipman: "That's kind of a private question..." Funny that was his response when he has advocated for a gun registry where citizens would have to disclose every gun they possess.
"There is nothing in the constitution that prevents congress from creating sensible gun laws" Ummm, how about where is says "Shall NOT BE INFRINGED" ??
@@kindanyume All cops are bad cops. There is no such thing as a good cop. There is such a thing as a cop with good morals. But those guy usually get fired or framed. A cop's job is too do nothing but follow orders, no matter what they say.
He was never a decent cop either. His presence in a confirmation hearing of any kind is an affront to free citizens. He doesn't have the moral qualifications to be a dog catcher.
"Do you believe assault weapons should be banned?" "Yes" "What is an assault weapon" "It's whatever congress says it is" So tell me, how the hell do you say you're for banning something, that congress has not defined?! You have to actually have a definition in your head of what you consider it to be, to say that you believe something should be banned. What's really going on is he's, admitting without saying, that he's there to do the Democrats bidding like a puppet on a string.
In a way Mr. Chipman did answer the question as to what an Assault Weapon is. (27:06 - 29:11) Sen. Cotton's question "How would you define an 'Assault Weapon'?" Mr. Chipman's answer "The ATF defined an Assault weapon as ANY semi-automatic rifle capable of accepting a detachable magazine over the caliber of a 22."
@@michaelsmith740 The ATF doesn't get to define anything. They're not a legislative body, they're an enforcement body. The notion that they would define it at all, is in itself a violation of the separation of powers, and at best, a misuse of government resources by the very act of defining it. Assault weapons is a phrase made up out of whole cloth, no different than if I were to call a baseball bat an "assault club". But you missed the point entirely. He's for banning "assault weapons", yet there is no definition of assault weapons, and he refused to give an example of what he believes an assault weapon is, yet believe "they" should be banned.....whatever "they" is. If he believes something should be banned based on a definition that hasn't been defined and that he won't opine on, then what is the basis for his belief in banning them? See, that's the logic problem with his answer. Of course we know the answer: He's a political shill and trying to dance around admitting his agenda. What if congress defines an "assault weapon" as something he believes isn't strict enough? Would he be happy with their definition of "assault weapons"? Clearly not. After all, he said an assault weapon should be what congress decides. But the truth is that's a cop out to try to force congress to define an assault weapon, which is a partisan political phrase. The real truth is we shouldn't be classifying or defining "assault weapon" at all. But Democrats want to induce a definition being laid out, and this guy is just meddling to try to help that along.....which again, is a violation of the separation of powers. What it's all really about is eroding rights. First it's automatic weapons, then it's semi automatic, and next you won't be able to own anything stronger than a BB gun. Meanwhile, the criminals will still have weapons. Guns are banned in the UK....criminals still use guns. The UK murder rate is almost exactly the same as the USA....and that's for a country 6 times smaller. Clearly it's not about stopping crime or killing sprees. It's about eroding rights for nefarious purposes. If they can erode one right in such a way, then they can use the same process to erode any other right. They've already done it, they just want to further erode them more. Then things like unpopular speech will be labeled as "assault speech" and banned, effectively allowing people to only say what the establishment allows them to.
@@peoplez129 I was pointing out that MR. Chipman does have some idea of what HE considers an Assault Weapon to be based on his some 25 years working with the ATF as an agent, and that was the point of the question "How would YOU define an Assault Weapon?" One thing none of these people that want to ban the sale, manufacture, and importation of so called Assault Weapons is that 99% of Law Enforcement uses these SAME weapons...The AR-15 and variants there of. They are known as Tactical Assault Weapons. I for one am for people having what ever they feel they need to defend their home, family, and lives within in reason. I really don't see the need for a FULLY automatic rifle for home defense. I would gladly use an AR-15 style rifle in ANY caliber up to a .338 to defend my family.
The desire to "arrest people before they committing crimes" is a sign of extreme hubris and spiritual sickness. Life is an uncontrolled and uncontrollable process. If you think you can control everything you shouldn't control anything.
I really want to thank Collin for all your content. I never knew as much as I do know about gun laws and other things. Much respect 🙏🏽 please continue put out great information
He did an excellent job, and the strong insinuations that Chip was lying were greatly appreciated. Chip's immediate attempt to schmooze Cruz with the remark about Dr. Pepper and central Texas was hilarious; he seemed a little desperate to shake off all those pesky questions and accusations from Mr. Lee!
ANYBODY INVOLVED IN THE WACO FIASCO SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED. PERIOD!!!
Waco was a shit show
@@adamethridge7824 The entire ATF is a shitshow!
@@w6krg I know they are unnecessary
@@adamethridge7824 m
Anyone who defends the fed's escalation at Waco shouldn't be considered. Period. I get the later half of the timeline is convoluted, but they drove a *tank* through the wall.
A military tank, to bust someone for weapon charges.
If you don’t think he’s been appointed to take guns you’re lying to yourself.
My man...
There is no way in hell that they'll be able to confiscate our guns, NO WAY.
What they'll do is ban the sales of AR-15's, other similar rifles and high capacity magazines. New York has already done away with 30 round magazines, but thank God for New Hampshire which is just a 2 hour drive away!!
Semper Fi!!
Good thing I lost mine in a boating accident.
(Its a meme folks no need to be upset)
@@randyjon224 Katrina.
In the fiscal year, 2020, ATF had 5082 employees. Of those, 2653 were special agents. If American gun owners allow 2653 bureaucrats to disarm us, we deserve everything that happens after that.
Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms should be a store not a government agency
Lmao. Well stated.
I’m gonna get that printed on a shirt.
@Radar Love oooo that challenger
We got one of those in nh..... well u got to cross the street for guns
A one stop shop
No law will ever stop a criminal from doing anything! This guy is a cook !
ATF. The only “police” force I support defunding.
Agreed!
How did alcohol and tobacco get lumped in with firearms? Why do they need a bureau for any?
@@alwaysopen7970 prohibition.....but I don't know if the atf is that old though. Maybe there used to be a problem with illegal non taxed sale of tobacco or something. Plus there are legal issues surrounding tobacco you have to be 21 to smoke it but they're not gonna send the ATF to Casey's To investigate the 16 year old that bought a pack of Pall malls
All 3 in which are legal but their focus is on, which means 3 THEY WANNA SO BADLY BAN
naw, abolish.
Don’t know who said this but it’s true...
“The Constitution doesn’t need to be re-written...it needs to be re-read”.
Or to put it another way, read it in light of when it was written. The meaning of words change, but the left insists on reading it in a modern context when it suits them. Take the definition of "militia", for example.
@@jameskaraganis2569
I have to disagree.... the meaning of words never changes. Only the perception vs the intent. We know the context in which the constitution was intended for.... only now have people chosen to perceive it differently.
The foresight of the founders to anticipate this is exactly why it was written. That was their intention.
It’s not hard to perceive the why and how it was written today more than ever.
@@hailtothe_rooster1572 I have to disagree. The meaning of words changes constantly over time, that is the nature of language. I'm not certain why you think otherwise.
@@jameskaraganis2569 what does the word Militia mean today that meant something different in 1776? Freedom? Arms? Infringed? Right?
@@jameskaraganis2569
Let’s take the first for example
Freedom of speech... are you telling me the meaning of speech in 2021 has changed to mean “only what someone wants to hear” OR does it still mean expression of thoughts and feelings
How about the big three? Life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness. How have the meaning of those ever changed?
“If you can’t answer my question why should I vote for you?” If only Americans used this logic for the election...
@Michael Casias yes and I hope for less sheep next time If we even have a next time
I agree entirely we didn't never ended up with that fascist Trump
@@ronniegines6512 Nationalism=fascism? Tf are you on?
@@ronniegines6512 yeh with all the dangerous peace deal he make idk like full out of Syria, make peace in Korea
@@user-gu1hl2kx2k ha no. This might just be the most unpopular president in history. And his Vice President was the most unpopular candidate when she was in the running. This election showed us that they can do whatever they want. If Bernie got the Democratic nomination, I might actually believe he could’ve beat trump. But Biden? No way man. Dude can’t even put a coherent sentence together.
I cannot understand how anyone in their right mind doesn’t understand that it’s not the gun, it’s the person behind the gun. Ridiculous.
"I want to take your assault weapon."
"What is an assault weapon?"
" I can't tell you."
LOL WTH??! This fella is VERY dangerous to our Liberty.
An assault weapon is anything we need it to be to undermine constitutional rights. This is really really sad.
If they don’t describe it in detail, it’s a grey area. A Grey area is one they can manipulate to fit their agenda. 😉
He said that an assault weapon is what Congress defines it as. That is the right answer. He shouldn’t be enforcing his opinions, just the laws as written. I don’t like the guy and I don’t like his views, but this was the right answer. It’s not the job of the ATF director to decide what an “assault weapon” is, or to enforce their opinion on the subject.
@@CutlassOutdoors I agree that he shouldn't enforce his opinions IFF he gets the job. But he is not in the job yet and they were asking his opinion to deduce his suitability for the position. Also it is a a double edged sword, as IFF he gets the job Congress will often defer to him/her to make recommendations as to how Congress should define it.
@@samhouston5217 that’s a good point. Still, I think his point that the director of the ATF doesn’t get to make policy, just enforce it, was intentionally misunderstood by most.
I wonder if he realized the irony when the Senator asked him what he owns and he said "that's a pretty private question." No shit, fuck stick. Now you know how the rest of us feel.
DAMN STRAIGHT, SIR but who's going to take his guns, right ? Unlike us he's in a special class so he should not mind giving out that info.
Excellent point, Senator😂😂😂
Well Said Sir!!!
Knows how we feel, still doesn't care.
“Senator thank you for the question” lol
This guy is the poster child for government indifference towards the people.
He literally doesn’t care about anyone else, they are just in the way.
he is what you call a government tyrant
Given his history and his participation in the slaughter of women and children, I’d say the word is not indifference, but outright malice and contempt.
This guy was personal involved with boots on the ground for Ruby Ridge, Waco, and Fast & Furious gun running. To me he should probably be in Jail not leading the ATF.
He is ignorant.
The Founding Fathers would be appalled that we even tolerate the existence of an agency like the ATF.
Yeah, it's time to stop pretending ANY of this is ok
Not really George Washington himself would abolished the ATF
Legal guns saves lives. Look at how many conceal and carry guns have protected Americans from illegal gun carriers.
“Are you going to arrest the president’s son?” That’s a juicy one.
Yup!!! By his definition he would arrest Hunter Biden, or…. does Hunter Biden get special privileges because he is the son of our current president?
Hahahhaaaaaa
@@logicthought25 100% correct! I thought shit like that was illegal?
The Secret Service was interfering with a lawful investigation to cover for Hunter Biden coke Head.
I liked that guy!
If they can’t block a nominee like him, they can’t block anyone. He is quite insane
He's the most dangerous Keebler Elf I've ever seen.
@@OnPointFirearms Fuck I can't un see it
He is scary. Dont forget what happened in waco
Concord & Lexington 2.0
Just a weirdo
Abolish the ATF and repeal the NFA.
And abolish FBI too
And CIA, and FBI. You know what, just get rid of half of all the alphabet agencies within the government.
*the federal government
And allow your average American to own machine guns, high explosives, and anti-tank weapons?
Sorry but that's where I draw the line.
Throw out the GCA while we are at it... and if we really get on a roll let's ditch the IRS and federal reserve. We do all that and we just might get a free country back!!
If he says "thank you for the question senator" one more time imma lose it
I know. Is it a requirement to say thank you before and after every statement. 😂😂
@@onthelevel189 I think it's just to buy time to come up with an answer but idk tho 🤷🏻♂️
It is peculiar statement after first time!!!
Right😂 just answer man
It means thank you for the oppurtunity to gaslight America.
"I'm a gun owner myself" is like the Fudd motto. It's always thrown out there as some way to justify restricting 2A rights. This guy just makes my skin crawl every time I hear him talk.
he probably has a single shot shotgun and a bolt action rifle.
@@matthewhoover6154 nah they’re all the guns from the people he burned
I'm a new gun owner and I dont understand the term "Fudd." I think of that term as something that means an oldschool shooter who doesnt use guns that have magazines. Do I have that right?
@@gr3yyp03 it’s a gun owner who supports gun control
What gun does he own? A Mattel Fanner 50? OOOPS! That's got a high-capacity magazine! He needs to confiscate himself.
Could you imagine how people would react if a gun owner said "I would love to arrest, jail or eliminate members of government *before* they can violate the Constitution"?
Sounds good to me.
@@FUNKOfilms 😂😂
@ They already are. Have a phone? You're under surveillance.
It would be alphabet agency time
You spelled hung for treason wrong
Senator: "Are you a complete idiot?"
Him: "Thank you for that question senator."
Bro I'm dead lmao holy shit I laughed way too hard on that one
@@kevinsaltz7849 I swear this guy says thank you no matter how aggressive the question then he starts talking about Dr. pepper for Ted Cruz??? WHO IS THIS GUY looool
THANK YOU FOR ALLOWING ME TO CLARIFY FOR YOU***
LOL!
Looks like Hanover Fiste from that film Heavy Metal. ;)
Time to repeal the NFA and disband the ATF
“What do you own?”...
“That’s a private question”
Exactly so gtfo here trying to take my privately owned property.
Then proceeds to tell us the weapon and serial number. WTF?!?
He knows he has the same firearm he's trying to ban for everyone else. He should be required to disclose all of his privately owned assets to the public to highlight the hypocrisy.
Dude I literally yelled out EXACTLY!! When he said that's kind of private.
Amen
Bro, thats so true.
"im a gun owner myself" is a fancy way for him to say "I deserve to protect myself, but you don't"
I love how when kennedy asked him what guns he owned is said that it was a personal question, which was true, the problem what chippman kept inserting his personal interests when stating that he himself was a gun owner. I'd like to know if he owns any ar-15's and if theyll be registered or surrended under his amended nfa rules... im gonna guess not, he's special after all.
He has a black friend also.
Bingo, I'm better than you and my crime will be covered by Biden so it's ok if I do it. This guy is crazy.
Typical of a Maoist, Stalinist, Nazi, fascist, communist, or any other totalitarian. They all view the people as livestock to be managed, not as the ultimate authority of government.
@@asherdie I was thinking the same thing!
The whole “I’m a gun owner” statement is like saying “I’m not racist, I have a black friend”
Nice
"I'm a gun owner" he says as he kisses his toothpick-sized biceps.
I'll bet he owns a double barrel shotgun! "When I heard Joementia tell "parents" magazine buy a shotgun, I took that advice. He's such an intelligent guy and considering he's had personal security for decades he's very much in touch with the finer points of defending his home and loved ones! Thanks Joementia! And thank you for the nomination to direct the AFT!"
He probably bought the gun a week prior to his nomination, so he can come off as a reasonable impartial voice of gun ownership.
They all do it.
There is also no way this man has any black friends.
Two years ago, and it's only getting worse, yet we still haven't done anything about it?
Chipman: "I want to ban assault weapons."
Congressman: "What's an assault weapon?"
Chipman: "idk"
I tried to like your comment 10x!!!!
Chipman: Thank you for that question but not to worry. I'll just confiscate All Guns if you nominate me, especially ones that shoots real bullets.
Anything that BIDEN and the DEMOCRATS tell me it is.
...Duh a Duh!
Chipman says that congress will decide the definition of an assault weapon...but then congress, bc they know nothing about firearms, delegates that duty to the ATF. So Chipman then decides anyway.
Repeal NFA, abolish ATF... problem solved💁🏻♀️
If people took to change.org and got a petition going to abolish these clowns and show the people don't want the ATF and these gun grabbers around!
@@TheNotSoGoodGamer007 you really think the feds give a flying fuck about some online petition unless it suits their own agenda?! That is a good fucking joke bro.
Yup. They were created for the purpose of prohibition and that was proven to be a failure just like the war on drugs. This agency should have been dissolved a long time ago. We don’t need or want an illegitimate illegal agency who’s focus is restricting fundamental constitutionally guaranteed civil rights. This is an absurd agency. And the fact that this creepy crooked mouth creep was part of the Waco MURDERS is just absolutely absurd. They don’t really take this guy seriously. This is a test. This is them insulting us all. If this man is appointed director of that department....idk how much more absurd it can get. Joe Biden the klan connected so called party of prosperity? I mean wholly jumpin shit balls I feel like someone dosed me with acid or something and I just don’t know it yet
Badguys still have ways 2 b bad so problem not solved.
Good folks have rights 2 self preservation!!!
Historically, when Chipman intervenes "before they kill someone", he usually kills someone.
Most underrated comment here.
Waco
I like you; don't go to church this Sunday. -Chipman
If they want to come to my crib and infringe on my rights, they’ll regret that shit for the rest of the time they live on this planet. We have inalienable rights, and mine aren’t budging while I’m alive.
@@ThanksforcensoringmeTH-cam hell ya brother
Take a shot every time he says thank you for your question
Putting David Chipman in charge of the AFT is literally like putting Jeffrey Dahmer in charge of the FDA...
Well we already have vaccinated morons still wearing masks. Next thing you know we will have women who have had hysterectomies wanting to take birth control too.
Or like putting Epstein as head of an orphanage for children 🤦♂️
@@OfficialBigStick 😂😂😂 this comment killed me
Or asking a Catholic priest to be in charge of an orphanage, lol
Very apt compairison.
They should've asked him:
"What does 'shall not be infringed' mean to you?"
And then just watched him squirm. This is what happens when you give the government the authority to keep itself in check. It does not.
This is the only question I want to hear an answer from this weasel about.
Do you think that punk would tell the truth
Well...Uhm... I’d like to thank you for offering me a Dr. Pepper...Uhm... Uhm... Uhm.
He killed many but he's worried about us killing someone... They just wanted to disarm us so they can kill us government has never disarmed any group of people for the better of those people we might as well go to war and head straight for government
👏👏👏👏👏👏
I’m so sick of him “thanking” everyone for the question.
Gotta boot lick your way to the top. Look at the majority of the right
Its his tell when he's lying.
Thank you senator, for your comment.
YES!!! It's just a delaying tactic.
It's to burn time.
Thank God he wasn’t confirmed ! Disband the ATF !!! ASAP !
"The AR-15 is the gun I was issued on the ATF SWAT team"
There's not a single federal agency that issues AR-15's to their agents. If they are issued a rifle, it's a variant of the M4. Not the same semi-automatic rifle the public has access to.
Thats just his tactics showing...
If the government issues it to agents then it’s good enough for the Americans citizens! Repeal the NFA and disband the tyrannical ATF!
An m4 is an ar15 and vice versa. only thing that makes it an m4 is a 13.7" barrel and shorter gas system. Military versions have select fire and full auto.
@@oROBBIEo it’s not big of a difference between the two, but if I were to drop an auto sear into my AR, my freedoms and rights would be stripped.
@@therant311 I get that. Im very pro-gun and don't want this guy running the ATF either.
“As a gun owner myself” ...
*owns 2 muskets and a Hi Point*
That he keeps behind his stacks of tuna and jerky,lol
He probably owns all kinds of "assault weapons" and thinks you shouldn't. Just like every prospective tyrant, he's all about "rules for thee but not for me."
Oh so you own 2 guns
@@boximusprimate5089 His face looks like he has an M134 shoved up his ass as his EDC firearm.
Nothing wrong with a Hi-Point, BEST GUARANTEE IN THE BUSINESS & DAMN NEAR INDESTRUCTIBLE. If you have never owned one, don't shit on them. The pistols are heavy & feel like a brick but their VERY RELIABLE, CHEAP & ACCURATE. Used as a house gun or truck gun IMHO, but would never carry one, very heavy. Their rifles are VERY VERY GOOD, NOTHING CAN TOUCH THEM ON PRICE OR THEIR GAUNANTEE, ALSO ACCURATE.
He's talking in convoluted tyrant speak.
We need to start cutting off Government power.
This is just ridiculous,
And getting worse by the day.
How about we storm their houses and string them up in their front yards.
@@RadDadisRad what all options are there, to hold them accountable.
We need to continually ask questions like, "Where in the Constitution does the federal government get the authority for this organization?" The answer is, for almost every alphabet soup agency, "Nowhere does the Constitution give the federal government give them this authority."
Thank goodness the nomination was withdrawn! What an ashat!!!!!!!!
When you hear a nominee say “ thank you for that question Senator” they are buying time to search for a bullshit answer in their head.
If I never have to hear him say that again it'll be too soon
I wish someone would of asked him to stop saying thank you lol
@@richardmercado6285 I was thinking the same thing.
i mean to be fair what would you say while trying to think of an answer
@@plinyvicgames the fundamental issue here is that he shouldn’t have to think of an answer (one that is likely bs anyway). Someone facing an appointment for such a powerful position should rule with objectivity and not their HEAVILY politicized opinion/activism.
The fact that he looks at our constitution as a "road block" speaks volumes.
No kidding...
Him and Biden mock the constitution on almost a weekly basis. They swor to defend the constitution when they were sworn into office which means they committed perjury therefore they should be arrested for committing a crime.
@@johnspearance4072 so do every law enforcement agency and they enforce unconstitutional laws. Any gun law is unconstitutional and should not be enforced or followed by any true American.
It IS a road block, though. It is meant to stop people like him from getting their way.
He didn't say roadblock, he said guardrail.
This is terrifying. He is absolutely being put forth to confiscate weapons.
Just like Hitler did. History repeating itself.
Stop being terrified. Man up. A conflict between the People and the Ivory Tower was inevitable. I wish you good fortune in the wars to come.
Good luck, is all I have to say.
@@sinnersmakethebestsaints1890 agreed,, ATf can get sum!
Thank you for that question.
Thank you for that question.
Thank you for that question.
There IS difference between being polite and being TRITE!
I love Mr. Kennedy’s approach. “Define assault weapons bitch!”
Kennedy is a breath of fresh air, one of the handful of really good politicians in D.C.
@@grizzlygrizzle "good" and "politician" should never appear next to each other. There is simply no such thing.
Ya he grilled the shit out of him.lol
@@BashfulBloodletter Exactly. Even if they appear to be good, they aren’t.
Kennedy has him on the ropes but let him get away. Dude just said affirmatively he supports banning assault weapons. All you have to ask is “what exactly were you imagining as an assault weapon just now when you said you support banning them, regardless of how congress may one day define them?”
" Those that want to disarm you will never disarm themselves "
💯%
LOL For all their talk of a disarmed Utopia, they never offer to go first, do they?
David “I watch misled children burn” Chipman
More like "i burned misled children and watched"
Don't ya mean What A Cook Out Chipman? Don't forget the after pics of the victims killed in the compound
They're saying it wasn't him, apparently he didn't report to Waco until May 1993, which is after the 51 day seige had concluded. It wouldn't have surprised me if it had been true, because he's a complete moron, but it's still important to do our do diligence so it doesn't fall back on us
@Jimi Copeland chipmans bizarre adventure
@Jimi Copeland Stop believing FB posts...
!!"SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED"!!
PERIOD. And I, as a citizen, was born with a right I will !!NOT!! give up.
Mr. Chipman has a chip on his shoulder for the 2nd Amendment and the American way.
THIS. The very definition of tyrant.
More like Hard-on for fucking the 2-nd Amendment and the American way.
@J F EXACTLY! Doesnt want any shooting back
Remember its shitman!!!
”When the government says you don’t need guns, you KNOW you need guns” A famous native american quote I believe it is.
my mother is a very anti-gun person, yet even she has said "the only moral justification for owning a gun is if it's illegal to own one".
It was Geronimo. He actually had a couple really good quotes when it comes to government and firearms
If the government is dead set on disarming it’s citizens it is because they intend to do something to them that they know the citizens will shoot them for.
It is refreshing however, hearing so many senators asking poignant questions on behalf of the People.
Doesnt mean anything when he gets selected anyways
thats what politicians do. All bark no bite
“Particularly lethal,” is a huge red flag.
“I’ve never heard of this study” - “no I said it was mixed results”. This dude just lies and lies and lies.
Why do you think Joke Biden picked him? 😂😆
Chipman said in a private meeting with Cruz that the data on the AWB is mixed. He is clearly referencing the data as an aggregate. Crus makes a vague reference to a paper without providing the title, publication, or authors of the paper. No one can for sure know which study Cruz is talking about because he didn't tell us. I don't understand how you could have been confused by this exchange.
There are plenty of other things of substance to focus on in this hearing.
@Based F The image that is currently making the rounds through social media is not of Chipman. Chipman arrived in Waco a couple weeks later in the post investigation team. Even it were him it is irrelevant to this particular post. This post is attempting to catch him in a lie that he didn't commit. Bringing in other unrelated things is the definition of a red herring.
I don't particularly like the guy either but the conservative message is being drowned out by screams of lunacy, conspiracies, and lies. The Republican party claims to be the party of reason but nothing on any of these videos even resembles rational discord.
When you're interviewing for a position that shouldn't exist, don't be surprised when you get a really bad candidate.
He openly is for banning "assault weapons" while also admitting that he can't define what an "assault weapon" is....
an assault weapon is any weapon
@@Turkeymaster740 per him it is . he wants them all banned
He actually did define what an assault weapon is, any thing other than a bolt action .22! Gee, he’s not biased or anything!
That is because it is the job of congress to define what an assault weapon is when the law is created. We currently have no federal laws that define an assault weapon so he referred to a program within the ATF that defined an assault weapon as a rifle chambered larger than .22 and has a detachable magazine. He shouldn't have even brought that up and instead just pointed out that the term is a new category of firearm that is defined however congress wishes it to be defined if they pass a gun ban.
This does make a good point,... Who need to be creating definitions or weapons? ATF or congress. Several years ago a similar argument was made about the courts ruling on monopolies of dot coms. The point being they had no business DEFINING and ruling on that stuff. This is the same problem with gun definitions. Congress does not posess the techincical expertise to define what is or isn't. ATF should do that.
The fact he was even being considered for the job at all should be a red flag to all Americans.
"innocent until proven guilty" is extremely important!
Innocent until done the thing to be considered guilty of even.
ATF Director is a generous title.
“Dictator’s lieutenant” is more accurate
If this guy is an ATF director, I am the GOD OF THUNDER! This clown is a goof!
Reinhard Heydrich in the flesh. And he will be just as brutal.
@@orbitalair2103 Amen Brother. This guy absolutely is a disgrace and a TRAITOR to The Constitution and to US Good American People, Period!
😂 Agreed. But devil's lieutenant is not too far off either.
@@BabyCharlotteschannel this is true. But it wouldn’t matter. Anyone in any position of any philosophy involved in any behavior in this regime is by definition a dictator’s lieutenant. This government has absolutely no legitimacy whatsoever and so it really does not matter Who occupies that position: they have no more authority than the person who appointed them or the people who confirm them because Neither of them have any legitimate authority to appoint or confirm anyone.
It’s just as hard to listen to him as it is to look at him.
Lol Not sure which is worse.
I cringed everytime he penned his mouth... including breathing😖
He looks like the "oh my gerd" girl
He’s lying right to the senators face like they’re stupid or something, but they see his bullsh1t
You ain't lyin!
Not being able to define an assault weapon is very troubling. There’s going to be hundreds if not thousands of constitutional rights violations
The little troll was coached to say “Thank you, Senator for that question” at every question to waste just a bit of the Senator’s limited time.
Yea I noticed that too.
He's also pausing and slowly speaking.
Gives HIM time to compose answer. As he cant lie easy enough.
(you) and everyone who noticed ... We should have beer.
@@Diabolus_Musica his contempt for the Republican Senators is obvious…and the feeling is probably mutual.
“That’s a pretty personal question.” As he wants to make a list of all owned firearms public knowledge on a registry
Yeah this guy is smoking Richard for sure lmfao
Chipman wants to know how many guns I have, but won't say how many or what kinds of guns he has!🤦♂️
it is cause he does not really own any
"One set of rules for me, a different set for thee".
That's the Democrat way.
@@markfergerson2145 *democRAT
"I'm a gun owner myself"
sounds like the beginning of a "rules for thee but not for me" trend
All barn animals are created equal.
Some barn animals are created more equal.
Chipman was issued an ar15 by ATF. I needed one but you don't.
That's pretty much EVERY politician.
It's not the beginning It's the continuation!!
The beginning? It's been going on for decades but now it's just really obvious and in our faces.
Do not give him authority to be director of the atf matter of fact defund the atf.
"You're not going to spit down wind and then tell us it's raining!" Best comment ever.
I thought that was quite colorful!
I would have preferred the don't piss on my head and tell me it's raining but I get it. Was the best comment of the hearing!
This dude sold his soul... his eyes are the windows exposing his pure evil
Sometimes people are so ugly inside that it seeps to the outside.
You got that right.
The permafrown tells a story all in itself
Let me get this straight. He wants to ban a gun he can't define?
"Thank you for that question, Senator" is a stalling tactic to give time to think of how to answer without answering.
And pretty much of Bidens people do that. Its insanity
Let me circle back to that question.
It's more of a time eater for the questioner, since their time is limited. Added fluff to kill their time.
After they deny his appointment, they should fire him, then throw him in prison.
Let’s hope he don’t get appointed!!
For what crime?
He has a right to his opinion even if it is dumb.
@@torlumnitor8230 Exactly, maybe in Russia we would imprison him for his opinion but here we are free
I think they’ll find a way to ram him through on a minority majority
"what is an assault weapon?"
C'mon man you know .. the thing
That's a good one 😂
😆👏
@@justinrichard4005 Assault Weapon is a fear mongering political platform just like Sex Offender and Drug Dealer. The end goal is universal registration and control.
His response to that question speaks volumes. Couldn’t even define it
There is no such thing as a defensive weapon, there are defensive tactics or counter assaults. It's deterrent through superior firepower. Armor and position is defensive. Weapons are offense and the best defence is a good offense. Shotguns are great assault weapons. The problem is liberals are not "intellectual" enough to see that the term assault weapon is two terms. There is the action and the noun. Assault is the action or an intransitive verb, and weapon is the noun, and what you are using to assist in the action. A fork can be an assault weapon.
The first duty of any elected official is to uphold our Constitution.
Chippy is a wild eyed, Waco/ Ruby Ridge NUT. This person shouldn't be in charge of a dog pound....
"This person shouldn't be in charge of a dog pound"
With ATFs record of killing peoples pet dogs I think he shouldn't be let anywhere near them.
@@TheLastCockney I would trust PETA over the ATF in handling dogs.... and that says something.
not even bingo night! This fella needs to be put in a padded room with heavy meds. Anybody that takes a photo around charred dead children they just murdered, Need to be locked away for good!
My favorite line is when Kennedy asks him “what do you own by the way?” Chipman replies (with a smile) “That’s a pretty private question.”
Is that right?
I caught that. So now he wants to rely on his right to privacy, but will have no problem violating ours
@@YooToobz Nah, the best part is how he puts a claim out there to the public in order to give himself credibility, but refuses to actually supply any information to support said claim
Probably he owns a few silencers mounted on his AR15s and AR10s.
Senator - “What do you own?”
David Chipman “ that’s a pretty private question”
Isn’t Chipman trying to get us gun owner’s to TELL them every gun we have? Seems pretty ironic to me. 🤷🏼♂️
I would have asked him if he owned a "Fleshlight" NOW THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN PRIVATE!
More like hypocritical
That was hilarious! That's a private question and like you said they want to know what we have! Here California they do a background check every time you buy ammo, I mean every time so they even know how much ammo you possibly have. However, this butt plug wouldn't answer the question 🤔. POS floating in a toilet!!!
@@mang6423 that’s crazy! 😂
Rules for thee..
Clearly this guy should not be anywhere near the AFT, even as a janitor.
He sounds like a kid carefully dodging around the principals questions, not knowing that principal knows he's the one who shit in the sink.
Its not okay to do dookie in the urinal mkay?
@A Search Warrant For Google HQ as far as I’m concerned he’s dodged being on death row.
Thank you for asking me about that turd in the sink, I really feel like people have jumped to some crazy conclusions about that and thanks for letting me explain my understanding of the turd. That particular turd, well, I was in the bathroom that afternoon, but as a hall monitor. My position as a student and a hall monitor are different as you understand. And as a hall monitor I did see that turd but was unaware of whose turd that may have been. As an advocate, I am against pooping in the sink. But as a student if there are not clear signs posted against pooping in sinks I could see how one might be confused and make that mistake.
Again thanks for asking.
“Intervene before they killed someone.” So, a crime hasn’t yet occurred and you’re already guilty??
Welcome to the hellscape democrats want to create
yep
Thats the part I was watching as I was reading your post! So technically he should have thousands of years in prison.
I didn't know you could predict crime🤷🏽♂️
This guy is a dangerous lunatic.
That man's answers are just as goofy as his face.
I swear he looks like a child in his dad's suit.
he talks with his upper teeth out like he has nothing to hide when he talks as if the ATF calls the shots, not him. He's a puppet.
At first glance, I thought "fetal alcohol syndrome"
He looks like if you took Dustin from Smarter Every Day but made him a Sith Lord.
🤣🤣🤣 you are so right. I can't get over his mouth. The last time I saw a mouth like that it had a hook in it. And his ears geez he can almost take flight.
Nice job, Senator Lee. Thank you.
"we hate guns!"
Also them: has 24 Hour Armed Security
Edit: im a Filipino which gun control here in the Philippines is strict yet useless gun violence still exist to both cops and criminals
They don’t hate guns, they just hate non government officials like us “commoners” having guns.
@@jpphilosopher I was just going to say the same thing. "I don't like guns unless they're protecting me from you pathetic masses."
They just hate the common citizen having guns
@@coolstreetman That's because they want unchecked power.
Did he get offended and say "That's a pretty private question" when he asked him what guns he owns? But we will have to list all of the guns we own in a registry?
👍 right on point. He won't say what he owns because it probably fits in the "larger than a .22 and has a detachable magazine" category.
Rules for thee...
By non papered guns so you can use n lose. No paper trails in the next revolution. Hence their "gun show loophole," bull-💩
FOIA- someone needs to find out what guns he owns
Of course he did, because it’s the typical elitist liberal mantra. They like to make rules for everyone else, that don’t apply to themselves.
“Shall not be infringed” is pretty clear.
SHALL NOT. that means ever. Lol I wish people could understand this.
well regulated Militia
“For those who do not understand “rights” we need to make it clear once and for all.
The Second Amendment does not apply to semi-automatic rifles, nor does it apply to bolt action rifles, nor pistols, nor revolvers. The Second Amendment RESTRICTS GOVERNMENT. The technology of the firearm is irrelevant. The restrictions on government remain the same, regardless of the firearm. The Second Amendment was not written to grant permission for citizens to own and bear arms. It forbids the government to interfere with the right to keep and bear arms. “The right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed. “
This also applies to other “rights”. They are not granted, they stipulate inherit rights that the government may not prohibit. “
Time to start defund all 3 letter agency,and give any employee 2 months to start scheduling a interviews for new employment in a new agency. Defund them all they hate America!
"Shall not be infringed" is more like a wall than a "guard rail" buddy.
The guard rails on the roads are pretty tough lol
@@ThatToast watch street luge 🤯
@@unclephill4764 I would agree though that those concrete jersey barriers would be a better description instead of guard rails
Shall not be infringed should be Fort Knox
Quote by Senator Lee, "You're not gonna spit down wind and then tell us its just raining"! Love it!
Minority report reference is exactly what makes freedom important. Freedom is the reason we have due process.
No movies like that are predictive programming that the government is involved in and name dropping it here and now is not a coincidence. This will come to pass.
Where in the law does it say that in order to “bring a gun home” must “be ‘properly’ trained”????
The thing that made me laugh was when he was talking about lying on the form to get the firearm is 5 years. How is that Hunter Biden prosecution going?
Goin’ nowhere fast, apparently.
"An assault rifle is anything with a detachable magazine."
Well shit... I guess we gotta manufacture belt fed AR's now????
"Thank you for that recommendation senator, I think it would be a great idea if guns ate belts instead of bullets. Joementia mentioned that to me himself the other night while we were watching "Matlock" from 5-6pm. After which he went night night."
Gravity fed lead rain drops.
An innovative that has been around for well over 100 years.
@@BalrogUdun To the general public? No...
Good thing my rifles take clips!
Senator: "What kind of gun do you have?"
Chipman: "That's kind of a private question..."
Funny that was his response when he has advocated for a gun registry where citizens would have to disclose every gun they possess.
This is probably the most important comment in the entire section. They are all hypocrites to their core
💯
His security doesn’t use guns I guess. And his kids schools must have security guards posted with broadswords.
@@ferrisbueller9991 You fool that blade is far to sharp and would be classified as a assualt blade. They are only allowed butter knifes for security.
Rules for thee not for me
Notice how he said the constitution kept them in line?
"I'm a cop, not a lawyer..."
Why are you requesting legislation alterations?
Especially legislation of something he literally can't even define.
Exactly! 👍🏼
Took the words right out of my mouth
"There is nothing in the constitution that prevents congress from creating sensible gun laws"
Ummm, how about where is says "Shall NOT BE INFRINGED" ??
Stop making sense. You are confusing to many people.
Sensible is subjective.
Shall not be infringed is final
The constitution also does not have a list of firearms and how many bullets are allowed in sed firearm that the people are allowed to own..
That part must be written in Latin or some other language chipman can’t understand.
well regulated Militia
Senator: you are an idiot.
Chipman: thank you senator for allowing me to explain this to you I was dropped on my head as a baby
🤣🤣🤣🤣
Lmfao hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
I think that might be true 🤣😂🤣
Goddamnit Bobby
Lol
When politicians and bureaucrats tell us, over and over, how they feel, it behooves us to listen.
"I'm a cop, not a lawyer..." he is such a punk.
if hes actually a cop then hes the poster child for a BAD COP
@@kindanyume All cops are bad cops. There is no such thing as a good cop. There is such a thing as a cop with good morals. But those guy usually get fired or framed. A cop's job is too do nothing but follow orders, no matter what they say.
He’s not a cop anymore either. He’s a corrupt politician.
He was never a decent cop either. His presence in a confirmation hearing of any kind is an affront to free citizens.
He doesn't have the moral qualifications to be a dog catcher.
"Do you believe assault weapons should be banned?"
"Yes"
"What is an assault weapon"
"It's whatever congress says it is"
So tell me, how the hell do you say you're for banning something, that congress has not defined?! You have to actually have a definition in your head of what you consider it to be, to say that you believe something should be banned. What's really going on is he's, admitting without saying, that he's there to do the Democrats bidding like a puppet on a string.
That one fact, that he doesn't know what assault weapon disqualifies him for this job, even if he would be a janitor in ATF office if u ask me xD
In a way Mr. Chipman did answer the question as to what an Assault Weapon is. (27:06 - 29:11)
Sen. Cotton's question "How would you define an 'Assault Weapon'?"
Mr. Chipman's answer "The ATF defined an Assault weapon as ANY semi-automatic rifle capable of accepting a detachable magazine over the caliber of a 22."
@@michaelsmith740 The ATF doesn't get to define anything. They're not a legislative body, they're an enforcement body. The notion that they would define it at all, is in itself a violation of the separation of powers, and at best, a misuse of government resources by the very act of defining it. Assault weapons is a phrase made up out of whole cloth, no different than if I were to call a baseball bat an "assault club".
But you missed the point entirely. He's for banning "assault weapons", yet there is no definition of assault weapons, and he refused to give an example of what he believes an assault weapon is, yet believe "they" should be banned.....whatever "they" is.
If he believes something should be banned based on a definition that hasn't been defined and that he won't opine on, then what is the basis for his belief in banning them? See, that's the logic problem with his answer. Of course we know the answer: He's a political shill and trying to dance around admitting his agenda.
What if congress defines an "assault weapon" as something he believes isn't strict enough? Would he be happy with their definition of "assault weapons"? Clearly not. After all, he said an assault weapon should be what congress decides. But the truth is that's a cop out to try to force congress to define an assault weapon, which is a partisan political phrase. The real truth is we shouldn't be classifying or defining "assault weapon" at all. But Democrats want to induce a definition being laid out, and this guy is just meddling to try to help that along.....which again, is a violation of the separation of powers.
What it's all really about is eroding rights. First it's automatic weapons, then it's semi automatic, and next you won't be able to own anything stronger than a BB gun. Meanwhile, the criminals will still have weapons. Guns are banned in the UK....criminals still use guns. The UK murder rate is almost exactly the same as the USA....and that's for a country 6 times smaller.
Clearly it's not about stopping crime or killing sprees. It's about eroding rights for nefarious purposes. If they can erode one right in such a way, then they can use the same process to erode any other right. They've already done it, they just want to further erode them more. Then things like unpopular speech will be labeled as "assault speech" and banned, effectively allowing people to only say what the establishment allows them to.
@@peoplez129 I was pointing out that MR. Chipman does have some idea of what HE considers an Assault Weapon to be based on his some 25 years working with the ATF as an agent, and that was the point of the question "How would YOU define an Assault Weapon?"
One thing none of these people that want to ban the sale, manufacture, and importation of so called Assault Weapons is that 99% of Law Enforcement uses these SAME weapons...The AR-15 and variants there of. They are known as Tactical Assault Weapons.
I for one am for people having what ever they feel they need to defend their home, family, and lives within in reason. I really don't see the need for a FULLY automatic rifle for home defense. I would gladly use an AR-15 style rifle in ANY caliber up to a .338 to defend my family.
@@michaelsmith740 Indeed. Because of this definition they should just tell him to go away xD
The whole "they're law abiding until they're not" argument is so infuriating THAT DESCRIBES EVERYONE!!!!
The desire to "arrest people before they committing crimes" is a sign of extreme hubris and spiritual sickness. Life is an uncontrolled and uncontrollable process. If you think you can control everything you shouldn't control anything.
Yep, Democrats believe in the presumption of guilt.
@@markfergerson2145 so did Adolphe Hitteler.
(Intentionally misspelled because, well you know.)
He's literally planning to violate US law and US constitution... yet wants to arrest law abiding people because they might do something sometime.
everyone is guilty but some are more guilty than others.
I really want to thank Collin for all your content. I never knew as much as I do know about gun laws and other things. Much respect 🙏🏽 please continue put out great information
Incredible. This man is a danger to our country and our freedoms.
"I thought the punishment usually came after the crime" -Steve Rogers
And if lies on the forms is not being prosecuted then why ask it?
“The Ar-15 is a particularly lethal weapon”, I guess unlike other hunting rifles?
Like it will kill you deader than a Garand or a Winchester 1894 will? What is this fool talking about?
@@tygre7 it will kill you deader and scarier too
@yt isassho no trolling, unless you consider it trolling this POS they have put up for the nomination. I was attempting to show the absurdity of a ban
they want all guns, period.
I love my AR. I have more control over the firearm therefore accuracy and they know that too.
I want to protect my hearing while being able to hear whats going on around me, its pretty simple.
Electronic ear pro exists. I have several cans for .223 and I wouldn't shoot any of them without ear pro
Proud of my Senator, Mike Lee.
"Dont spit downwind and tell us its rain"
Lee is brilliant!
He did an excellent job, and the strong insinuations that Chip was lying were greatly appreciated. Chip's immediate attempt to schmooze Cruz with the remark about Dr. Pepper and central Texas was hilarious; he seemed a little desperate to shake off all those pesky questions and accusations from Mr. Lee!
In Texas we say, "Don't piss on my leg and tell me it's raining!". Fuk this guy!!