Although not the prettiest, the Navigator rides great and has a commanding view of the road. The profile is stodgy, but those windows are huge and gives so much visibility all around the truck. The seats are very comfortable and the interior is roomy and quiet. And that EcoBoost engine pulls so strongly you won't miss the old V8. It also doesn't lose power at high altitudes. It just keeps pulling without a hiccup. We love to rent this truck when we drive long distance with the family. We plan on buying one soon and don't care about it looking "old" and "dated". Function over fashion.
i know im randomly asking but does anyone know a way to log back into an Instagram account..? I somehow lost the account password. I would love any tips you can give me.
@Boone Leon thanks so much for your reply. I found the site thru google and Im trying it out atm. I see it takes a while so I will get back to you later with my results.
They failed to mention one factor - the Navigator is just about the only vehicle with a 3rd row that will really seat adults comfortably (the third row in an Escalade is cramped by comparison). Also, the second row is about the widest possible bench seat you can get anywhere. Three kids in booster seats will easily fit in the second row with plenty of elbow room between them. Finally, they exaggerate the price. You can get one for under $60k if you don't load it up with 4wd, or get the extended length version.
Ive rented both the Slade and Navi for road trips and prefer the Nav for its smooth ride and ability to gobble up highway miles. The Escalade rides more firm and is hard to get that buttery ride you may want on a road trip. Its not a problem just a preference. Both are great rides. I prefer the interior of the Cadi. If i could only take from each...
@@brianmcreynolds2431 4X4. My only concern is the turbos and how long they will last. It feels so luxurious and rides incredible. There are more things to fail compared to older cars but so far so good.
I think the feedback on the Navi has been unfair. Lest not forget how Caddies were overpriced Chevys not too long ago. Only recently they have finally achieved Euro-like prestige and quality. The MKZ, MKC, and the upcoming MKX are indicators of Lincoln heading toward a good path. The Navigator is the next runner-up, with a temporary "refreshment" to satisfy prospective buyers. The Navi shines in the interior and MyLincoln+Sync, which I love in my MKZ. Leather is top-notch, seats comfortable, more 3rd row leg-room and cargo room, and more towing. It's a step forward, just not a leap yet
I hate how car reviewers always find bad things to say about cars when this Lincoln Navigator in this year was one of the best SUVS you could buy. Everyone always hates on this car, only because Cadillac has "more room", when literally there is way more legroom in the Lincoln than there is in the Cadillac.
Acuravigor47 Not these days. Most minivans and 4cyl family sedans do 6 seconds to 0-60. Everyone is turbocharging 4cyl and 6cyl ecoshit. I remember when Expedition, pardon, Navigator did 0-60 in 12 seconds and that was crazy fast. Suburban/Escalade did it in 15seconds.
Acuravigor47 NOPE!! RANGE ROVER SPORT s/c(5.5) AND THE RANGE ROVER SVR(4.6secs) and they both cost way more than an Escalade or the Navi. if you're talking USA only then the JEEP GRAND CHEROKEE SRT-8, then look @ the BENZ ML 63 AMG and the PORSCHE CAYENNE GTS and TURBO
Driven the 2016 Ford Expedition EL V6 and while it's fast, it still lacks low rpm torque. Accelerating while driving in low rpm range means downshifts every time. That wasn't the case with the V8 engines.
It doesn't get rep in rap videos because that's immature. Thats not what Lincoln is aiming for, unlike Cadillac. Lincoln is aiming to be a luxury brand, and is succeeding at doing so.
Acc0rd79 Never liked the current Cadillac styling. Weird angular, and odd. Thank god they are starting to soften those edges some with the newer version each year.
I love my fords,but the comparison between the Navigator and current Escalade doesn't even come close. more like comparing apples to oranges. the Escalade hands down is a much better vehicle. seeing it in person is where it counts . the Navigator is a dated design that dates back to 2003.the only difference (externally ) from the 2003-2014 is the nose and rear.even the dashboard is a carryover. they killed off all of their V8s (which was not a good idea). I love my Ecoboost V6 platinum, but that engine should only be for pickup truck duty as an available option. the Navigator should have came equipped with the raptors 6.2L V8 .and now it's officially dead in half ton duty.
how are you gonna just steal the dodge Durango rear light? I saw this thing going down the street the other night and I was shocked. I own the new Durango.
This is what the 07+ plus models should’ve been I was here for the LED taillights other than that this is what I expected was completely disappointed with the 07-14 model years design language compared to the modern looking Denali / Escalade clusterfucks
I feel like ford doesn't know what to do with Lincoln one of problems with Lincoln is that people like the ford logo more and besides that what is the point of a Lincoln navigator when you can get a ford expedition platinum trim level with nearly all the same options. ford has tried to make Lincoln more appealing by offering exclusive crossovers but even that seems to not be enough for where Lincoln wants to be.
***** They know what to do with Lincoln, and its gonna be on par with Cadillac by 2018, remember that the Lincoln was reborn just a few years back 2011
Ponygt 662 I do commend ford for some of the victories they have made but they still have a ways to go. btw Cadillac isn't doing too well either they're in nearly the same boat as Lincoln which is they are viewed as old people cars.
Jump oricakle I think you really dont know whats happening around, just look at the new Lincoln continental concept thatz 94% production ready shown in NYAS, it looks stunnimg and ready to take on Audi A8,BMW 7,Jag XJ, not quiet as good adS Class still, very much the luxury car Ford needed it to be, Also Lincoln is growing very well in China where it gets great start, Cadillac is dead in Europe true and in USA too its just OK, but I appreciate their commintment to light weight cars and cheap affordable luxury, they are getting better and better, In China Cadillac sells as good as The Big German 3
***** - the mere of an Escalade is absolutely a GMC Yukon Denali. In short - the Cadillac Escalade has the same powertrain, magnetic ride control, design, similar headlights and interior as the GMC Yukon Denali, so what is your point?
Ponygt 662 performance wise I doubt they can beat the strong German competition but I have no doubt they will sell many cars in china since Chinese love luxury cars of nearly every brand so long as it looks expensive.
G.M. Cadillac is always playing catch up with Ford Lincoln: Lincoln did heated cooled seats first Lincoln had real wood interior, not plastic Lincoln had true fold flat rear seats, Cadillac still does not Lincoln had to wave foot under rear bumper thing before Cadillac (Ford Escape had it first) Lincoln has four wheel independent suspension, G.M. still does not If you ride in the back of a Lincoln you don’t feel like you are on the floor, unlike Cadillac Lincoln had the power side step first, and Cadillac copied it, so if you don’t like Ford’s you don’t like G.M.’s Lincoln will not rust quite as fast as Cadillac, that G.M. is better at. Cadillac now had less buttons on dash, something everyone else learned that the customer does not want. But years later G.M. puts it in the Escalade.
as a ford loyal owner,your points against GM sound rather highschool in nature. I actually like what GM has done with their current offerings . and the Escalade is a much better vehicle than the Navigator. I know that sounds blasphemous, but it is a much superior vehicle. although I love my platinum F150 with Ecoboost, the Navigator needs a V8. their asking price for such a vehicle doesn't warrants such an engine. as for GM keeping a solid axle? I don't blame them. some people do love to take their sport utes off roading. And as for the side steps? that's funny that you would make a childish rant. Cadillacs had power trunk pull downs way back since 1957,and Lincolns finally started adopting the old school technology in the mid 80s,but nobody said anything. technology is used and spread around to all car makers. your childish rants makes me laugh.
+Mark M (MMA) all of that technology you listed was already being used by other automakers such as BMW,And Audi to name a few. you obviously are biased and making a childish rant based on your ignorant viewpoints against Cadillacs. I've driven them both and will honestly say that the new Escalade is a much better vehicle. Secondly, you don't have to take my word for it. I suggest that you drive them both before you make a high school fan boy remark. Cadillac had night vision technology in 2000. something Lincoln never had. although Cadillac doesn't have it currently, but they had it. same for magnetic shocks. something Lincoln still doesn't have. or what about displacement on demand? yes it was a failed attempt back in 1981. but it is a technology used by GM and Chrysler today. cadillac started using fuel injection before Lincoln in 1975 Seville.what about transverse front wheel drive mounted V8s? or automatic leveling system (again another Cadillac first ) or automatic dimming headlights,power trunk pull down,heated seats (1957 technology ) but again it was something not heard back then from a Lincoln. shall I continue? what about doing your research on a 1957 Cadillac Eldorado Brougham.it might surprise you. 1957 Eldorado Cadillacs had suicide doors. Lincolns came back with it in 1961. Although there were cars using suicide doors from both Cadillacs and Lincolns in the 1930s,and 40s,this wasn't anything to brag about considering both car companies were both started by THE FORD MOTOR COMPANY. HENRY LELAND STARTED BOTH CADILLAC AND LINCOLN. don't believe me? read up on it. have a nice day
+Eric Haley Wow, fun banter. Not going to get caught up in that now. If memory serves me Leland started Lincoln because of the lack of support Cadillac was giving the war effort. My childish point in April was that at the time lots of press was being given to Cadillac for coming out with "new" upgrades, not seen in the class at the time.
Cadillac is leaning towards rear wheel drive. Lincoln are pretty much going front wheel drive. Except for the Navigator. That within itself takes Lincoln down a notch with Buick
The Escalade is on another level compared to this. Never been a Lincoln fan. I bought a Lincoln Mark 8 back in 1998 when it first came out and it was one of the worst cars ever. I know there trying but i also know they can do so much better. All the experts say Cadillac is about 10years ahead of Lincoln
Always like the series Motorweek. However, I can't stand the annoying music they play over the commentary. I watch the show on mute with closed captions.
The whole concept of body-on-frame SUV's is outdated. Modern unibody SUV's handle better, ride better, have better interior space and can tow nearly as much. The navigator actually pioneerd the full-size luxury suv segment, The idea was copied with the escalade and yukon denali.
I don't think adding the glitz to the overly outdated body is anymore attractive than it was 10 years ago... It's an aged model with a fancy front ended...Ford should just discontinue Lincoln, and add new models to the their offerings and updated the Expedition as well. Everything else fired makes looks fresher than Lincolns unpopular offerings...
Nothing like the good 'ol Five-Four, right? I miss the old V8 sound too, but having driven crosscountry in a 2015 Expedition EL Platinum with the new 3.5 V6 EcoBoost engine, man! That engine pulls!!! I'd swear by the old Triton sound, but I'd swear by the 3.5 V6 EcoBoost engine as a whole.
rangerover06sc personally I think it looks too much like an explorer and the interior quality is not up too part when comparing to others in its class.
troybballin14 Yes, but you pay a lot more for that better interior. And if you need the capability of a full size SUV the navigator is a pretty appealing package.
+cdude100 It's not. The Flex is a crossover with a significant design difference, as well as major differences in other specifics like towing capacity, gas mileage, and cargo space. The Navigator is a luxury clone of the Expedition.
Rudy F The Fuel economy is 22 highway, which is better than it's body on frame competitors from Lexus and Infiniti and the same as the Escalade. It also gets 16 city which is better than any other full sized body-on-frame SUV.
Dang, 40+ Years and John Davis is still going strong. Keep on keeping on, J.
I love John Davis's car reviews. I hope he never retires doing this. He is simply the best, non biased, honest car reviewer.
I'm laughing at the people trying to clown on this bad ass SUV that can't even afford one
I got to drive this and the Escalade at Phoenix Auto Show in Nov. 2015 and this was much more comfortable, roomy, and just felt nicer.
You must mean the escalade was...
south9563 nah, he clearly meant the Navigator. Suit yourself with the Escalade sure
This thing is very fast considering it weighs over 6000 pounds! Thanks John Davis, your the best out there!
Very nice this Lincoln Navigator
Although not the prettiest, the Navigator rides great and has a commanding view of the road. The profile is stodgy, but those windows are huge and gives so much visibility all around the truck. The seats are very comfortable and the interior is roomy and quiet. And that EcoBoost engine pulls so strongly you won't miss the old V8. It also doesn't lose power at high altitudes. It just keeps pulling without a hiccup. We love to rent this truck when we drive long distance with the family. We plan on buying one soon and don't care about it looking "old" and "dated". Function over fashion.
I think it’s pretty, not the prettiest but it is a good looking truck
i know im randomly asking but does anyone know a way to log back into an Instagram account..?
I somehow lost the account password. I would love any tips you can give me.
@Jaxon Caiden Instablaster =)
@Boone Leon thanks so much for your reply. I found the site thru google and Im trying it out atm.
I see it takes a while so I will get back to you later with my results.
@Boone Leon it worked and I actually got access to my account again. Im so happy!
Thank you so much, you saved my ass !
I love it. The Escalade is so the norm now. The Navigator just seems different. I just want them to do away with the air ride suspension.
They failed to mention one factor - the Navigator is just about the only vehicle with a 3rd row that will really seat adults comfortably (the third row in an Escalade is cramped by comparison). Also, the second row is about the widest possible bench seat you can get anywhere. Three kids in booster seats will easily fit in the second row with plenty of elbow room between them. Finally, they exaggerate the price. You can get one for under $60k if you don't load it up with 4wd, or get the extended length version.
HP I love your comment and wish more like you will review cars. Too many of the same type of people reviewing. We need different perspectives.
I love it💕 it's simply simple luxury.
Ive rented both the Slade and Navi for road trips and prefer the Nav for its smooth ride and ability to gobble up highway miles. The Escalade rides more firm and is hard to get that buttery ride you may want on a road trip. Its not a problem just a preference. Both are great rides. I prefer the interior of the Cadi. If i could only take from each...
+Jacob Barros ride quality means a lot in a vehicle and we all know except for cnet that this rides more like a car than a truck.
I'm not sure about you're use of the term "Ridin' high" here John...
6.2 secs. from 0-60?? Oh my!!
I just bought my 2015 in 2024. 100k miles. Ive never drove a car this enjoyable.
Did you get the 4x4 or 4x2?
@@brianmcreynolds2431 4X4. My only concern is the turbos and how long they will last. It feels so luxurious and rides incredible. There are more things to fail compared to older cars but so far so good.
In 2024, those rims aged GREAT!
the running boards too
I think the feedback on the Navi has been unfair. Lest not forget how Caddies were overpriced Chevys not too long ago. Only recently they have finally achieved Euro-like prestige and quality.
The MKZ, MKC, and the upcoming MKX are indicators of Lincoln heading toward a good path. The Navigator is the next runner-up, with a temporary "refreshment" to satisfy prospective buyers. The Navi shines in the interior and MyLincoln+Sync, which I love in my MKZ. Leather is top-notch, seats comfortable, more 3rd row leg-room and cargo room, and more towing.
It's a step forward, just not a leap yet
Wow, a modern design with personality, and that looks good. And is fast, too.
I like the front end on the Navigator but I think the interior looks better in the Expedition
I hate how car reviewers always find bad things to say about cars when this Lincoln Navigator in this year was one of the best SUVS you could buy. Everyone always hates on this car, only because Cadillac has "more room", when literally there is way more legroom in the Lincoln than there is in the Cadillac.
0 to 60 mph in 6.2 seconds. If that's true, it will out run any Mustang GT from 98 back.
is this the fastest full size SUV on the market? 0-60 in 6.2 is crazy fast.
I think the new escalade will do it it just under 6 seconds which is ridiculous
Acuravigor47 Not these days. Most minivans and 4cyl family sedans do 6 seconds to 0-60. Everyone is turbocharging 4cyl and 6cyl ecoshit. I remember when Expedition, pardon, Navigator did 0-60 in 12 seconds and that was crazy fast. Suburban/Escalade did it in 15seconds.
Y10Q Keep in mind minivans are lighter.
Acuravigor47 NOPE!! RANGE ROVER SPORT s/c(5.5) AND THE RANGE ROVER SVR(4.6secs) and they both cost way more than an Escalade or the Navi. if you're talking USA only then the JEEP GRAND CHEROKEE SRT-8, then look @ the BENZ ML 63 AMG and the PORSCHE CAYENNE GTS and TURBO
That is fast. 14Sec in the 1/4mile is pretty damn quick for a 5000+lb truck.
October 8, 2018 anyone?? Comparing this to the all new 2018 model is a HUUUGEEE difference.
Driven the 2016 Ford Expedition EL V6 and while it's fast, it still lacks low rpm torque. Accelerating while driving in low rpm range means downshifts every time. That wasn't the case with the V8 engines.
This turbo V6 puts out more torque than the 2014 V8 in the same vehicle..
This turbo V6 puts out more torque than the 2014 V8 in the same vehicle..
The last GT500 drivetrain should be in the wrap version of this SUV
You guys should do one for the Expedition with Sync 3! I know they are similar but the expedition has is different enough.
The front tires, especially the right side seem to protrude too far outside of the wheel wells.
I wish they could do something with that rear windshield. It looks like Frankenstein's monster.
why the hell did lincoln rig the front seats to only accomodate short people?
You know why it doesn't get much rep in those Rap videos? Because the Lincolns are just UGLY! The Escalade is just a beauty on wheels.
It doesn't get rep in rap videos because that's immature. Thats not what Lincoln is aiming for, unlike Cadillac. Lincoln is aiming to be a luxury brand, and is succeeding at doing so.
Delshon Knolton looks over "prestige" the escalade looks better and caddy is more prestigious than Lincoln all day long.
How would a guy with a Nissan know about how cars look?!
Acc0rd79 Never liked the current Cadillac styling. Weird angular, and odd. Thank god they are starting to soften those edges some with the newer version each year.
looks like grumpy cat
I love my fords,but the comparison between the Navigator and current Escalade doesn't even come close. more like comparing apples to oranges. the Escalade hands down is a much better vehicle. seeing it in person is where it counts . the Navigator is a dated design that dates back to 2003.the only difference (externally ) from the 2003-2014 is the nose and rear.even the dashboard is a carryover. they killed off all of their V8s (which was not a good idea). I love my Ecoboost V6 platinum, but that engine should only be for pickup truck duty as an available option. the Navigator should have came equipped with the raptors 6.2L V8 .and now it's officially dead in half ton duty.
it will get a completely new redesign for 2018 and be sold at the end of 2017. this is just a refresh.
How they going to remove the iconic aluminum finish interior and throw in a ford fuesta interior cmon. I see the end for the navi coming soon.
love these videos.
Please ford bring back the aviator. Now that you got rid of the Mercury line there's no reason why you can't make a baby navigator.
how are you gonna just steal the dodge Durango rear light? I saw this thing going down the street the other night and I was shocked.
I own the new Durango.
I like the last Gen Navi better
Eskimopride07 why do you like the prior generation of Navigators better than the 2015? Thank you.
This is what the 07+ plus models should’ve been I was here for the LED taillights other than that this is what I expected was completely disappointed with the 07-14 model years design language compared to the modern looking Denali / Escalade clusterfucks
I feel like ford doesn't know what to do with Lincoln one of problems with Lincoln is that people like the ford logo more and besides that what is the point of a Lincoln navigator when you can get a ford expedition platinum trim level with nearly all the same options. ford has tried to make Lincoln more appealing by offering exclusive crossovers but even that seems to not be enough for where Lincoln wants to be.
***** They know what to do with Lincoln, and its gonna be on par with Cadillac by 2018, remember that the Lincoln was reborn just a few years back 2011
Ponygt 662 I do commend ford for some of the victories they have made but they still have a ways to go. btw Cadillac isn't doing too well either they're in nearly the same boat as Lincoln which is they are viewed as old people cars.
Jump oricakle
I think you really dont know whats happening around, just look at the new Lincoln continental concept thatz 94% production ready shown in NYAS, it looks stunnimg and ready to take on Audi A8,BMW 7,Jag XJ, not quiet as good adS Class still, very much the luxury car Ford needed it to be,
Also Lincoln is growing very well in China where it gets great start, Cadillac is dead in Europe true and in USA too its just OK, but I appreciate their commintment to light weight cars and cheap affordable luxury, they are getting better and better,
In China Cadillac sells as good as The Big German 3
***** - the mere of an Escalade is absolutely a GMC Yukon Denali. In short - the Cadillac Escalade has the same powertrain, magnetic ride control, design, similar headlights and interior as the GMC Yukon Denali, so what is your point?
Ponygt 662 performance wise I doubt they can beat the strong German competition but I have no doubt they will sell many cars in china since Chinese love luxury cars of nearly every brand so long as it looks expensive.
G.M. Cadillac is always playing catch up with Ford Lincoln:
Lincoln did heated cooled seats first
Lincoln had real wood interior, not plastic
Lincoln had true fold flat rear seats, Cadillac still does not
Lincoln had to wave foot under rear bumper thing before Cadillac (Ford Escape had it first)
Lincoln has four wheel independent suspension, G.M. still does not
If you ride in the back of a Lincoln you don’t feel like you are on the floor, unlike Cadillac
Lincoln had the power side step first, and Cadillac copied it, so if you don’t like Ford’s you don’t like G.M.’s
Lincoln will not rust quite as fast as Cadillac, that G.M. is better at.
Cadillac now had less buttons on dash, something everyone else learned that the customer does not want. But years later G.M. puts it in the Escalade.
as a ford loyal owner,your points against GM sound rather highschool in nature. I actually like what GM has done with their current offerings . and the Escalade is a much better vehicle than the Navigator. I know that sounds blasphemous, but it is a much superior vehicle. although I love my platinum F150 with Ecoboost, the Navigator needs a V8. their asking price for such a vehicle doesn't warrants such an engine. as for GM keeping a solid axle? I don't blame them. some people do love to take their sport utes off roading. And as for the side steps? that's funny that you would make a childish rant. Cadillacs had power trunk pull downs way back since 1957,and Lincolns finally started adopting the old school technology in the mid 80s,but nobody said anything. technology is used and spread around to all car makers. your childish rants makes me laugh.
+Eric Haley Childish High Schooler, ah to be that young again.
+Mark M (MMA) all of that technology you listed was already being used by other automakers such as BMW,And Audi to name a few. you obviously are biased and making a childish rant based on your ignorant viewpoints against Cadillacs. I've driven them both and will honestly say that the new Escalade is a much better vehicle. Secondly, you don't have to take my word for it. I suggest that you drive them both before you make a high school fan boy remark. Cadillac had night vision technology in 2000. something Lincoln never had. although Cadillac doesn't have it currently, but they had it. same for magnetic shocks. something Lincoln still doesn't have. or what about displacement on demand? yes it was a failed attempt back in 1981. but it is a technology used by GM and Chrysler today. cadillac started using fuel injection before Lincoln in 1975 Seville.what about transverse front wheel drive mounted V8s? or automatic leveling system (again another Cadillac first ) or automatic dimming headlights,power trunk pull down,heated seats (1957 technology ) but again it was something not heard back then from a Lincoln. shall I continue? what about doing your research on a 1957 Cadillac Eldorado Brougham.it might surprise you. 1957 Eldorado Cadillacs had suicide doors. Lincolns came back with it in 1961. Although there were cars using suicide doors from both Cadillacs and Lincolns in the 1930s,and 40s,this wasn't anything to brag about considering both car companies were both started by THE FORD MOTOR COMPANY. HENRY LELAND STARTED BOTH CADILLAC AND LINCOLN. don't believe me? read up on it. have a nice day
+Eric Haley Wow, fun banter. Not going to get caught up in that now.
If memory serves me Leland started Lincoln because of the lack of support Cadillac was giving the war effort.
My childish point in April was that at the time lots of press was being given to Cadillac for coming out with "new" upgrades, not seen in the class at the time.
Cadillac is leaning towards rear wheel drive. Lincoln are pretty much going front wheel drive. Except for the Navigator. That within itself takes Lincoln down a notch with Buick
it's exactly as my F150 under the hood ......
slightly more :D...and this would a bit heavier than F150 as well ....
I’ll bend over to tie my shoes , don’t confuse me with your girlfriend.
i dont know about this but the 2016 has independent rear suspension unlike any other big suv
my 2008 has independent rear suspension
The Escalade is on another level compared to this. Never been a Lincoln fan. I bought a Lincoln Mark 8 back in 1998 when it first came out and it was one of the worst cars ever. I know there trying but i also know they can do so much better. All the experts say Cadillac is about 10years ahead of Lincoln
i love it
Always like the series Motorweek. However, I can't stand the annoying music they play over the commentary. I watch the show on mute with closed captions.
Escalade is nicer but, this is still a very nice SUV.
Dear MotorWeek ...
Plz go to KBB.com TH-cam channel and learn how to make reviews .
Sincerely Everyone
I find that rear end is horrid. The window seems huge and hangs too low.. those tail light too eww..
Ditch the grill.
Jorge Rodriguez
Too big LMAO. Take a peak at the Escalades grille
Lol they talk about mpg... Even some crossovers don't get any better mpg....
Not enough updates to stay relevant imo.
+TJC450 says the buick fan
Gregory Perkins Sure am. Buick also has a few dated cars in it's line up ready for replacement. So Ford isn't the only brand.
No sunroof 60 grand interior looks dull
The whole concept of body-on-frame SUV's is outdated. Modern unibody SUV's handle better, ride better, have better interior space and can tow nearly as much.
The navigator actually pioneerd the full-size luxury suv segment, The idea was copied with the escalade and yukon denali.
Blue-eyed Fox Unibody do not tow nearly as much are no where as big.
I don't think adding the glitz to the overly outdated body is anymore attractive than it was 10 years ago... It's an aged model with a fancy front ended...Ford should just discontinue Lincoln, and add new models to the their offerings and updated the Expedition as well. Everything else fired makes looks fresher than Lincolns unpopular offerings...
Gary James
Then they would only have 1 brand, to GM's 4 and Chrysler's 3. Actually the MKC is selling well, and probably the new MKX will as well.
R i p Lincoln
Wow! First comment and view in 5 videos!! ;)
big fucking deal, what's that supposed to mean?
First is the worst
Doesn't sound right with a car engine... Miss the V8.
Nothing like the good 'ol Five-Four, right? I miss the old V8 sound too, but having driven crosscountry in a 2015 Expedition EL Platinum with the new 3.5 V6 EcoBoost engine, man! That engine pulls!!! I'd swear by the old Triton sound, but I'd swear by the 3.5 V6 EcoBoost engine as a whole.
The new engine is much better. It has better acceleration, more horsepower and slightly better gas mileage.
Its the worst in its class at everything besides voice recognition lol.
It's the best at towing, has the best third row, and you get a ton of value as well. Plus the ride handling combo has earned it nothing but praise
rangerover06sc personally I think it looks too much like an explorer and the interior quality is not up too part when comparing to others in its class.
troybballin14 Yes, but you pay a lot more for that better interior. And if you need the capability of a full size SUV the navigator is a pretty appealing package.
Now I see why the Navigator isn't in rap videos. This thing is atrocious
Handsome ? facepalm...
It looks like a 2006 Expedition. This review is garbage.
You better delete this comment immediately because you have caused a lot of confusion and delay
it's literly a Ford flex
+cdude100 It's not. The Flex is a crossover with a significant design difference, as well as major differences in other specifics like towing capacity, gas mileage, and cargo space. The Navigator is a luxury clone of the Expedition.
The Lincoln MKT is based on the Ford Flex.
MOTORWEEK, …. why didn't you state the fuel economy of this out of date dinosaur?
Rudy F
The Fuel economy is 22 highway, which is better than it's body on frame competitors from Lexus and Infiniti and the same as the Escalade. It also gets 16 city which is better than any other full sized body-on-frame SUV.
this car is ugly
The worst suv ever made. Wow just horrible
I love mine.
@@redlinerichie Best ever made,,,,,,,