The EU VS the World - Interview with EU Foreign Affairs & Security Policy

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 44

  • @mosca204
    @mosca204 หลายเดือนก่อน +39

    This is really cool, but honestly if you are not seeing this live, I think the channel should make a shorter video with highlights. I'm interested in the topic, but a 1h video is quite bothersome. Just some feedback for future improvement. Keep up the awesome work!

    • @bartekjedrzejewski7594
      @bartekjedrzejewski7594 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Actually I like long videos

    • @Mecrom
      @Mecrom หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      I disagree. Longer interviews compliment short compressed scripted videos quite well. Obviously watching it live is much cooler though.

    • @NotUnymous
      @NotUnymous หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I too like Details in complicated topics (so, long videos). But chapters would have been nice.

    • @EUMadeSimple
      @EUMadeSimple  หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Thank you for your feedback, to help with your viewing experience I've added timestamps so you can skip to the parts in the livestream that you're interested in! - Elliot

    • @garypalmer1122
      @garypalmer1122 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Maybe you should work on your concentration / attention span?

  • @sog242
    @sog242 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I want more of this. This channel teaches me alot about the EU.

  • @spyrossrules
    @spyrossrules หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I have been loving these long, podcast like interview. Keep it up!

  • @EKP41423
    @EKP41423 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Thank you for the great interview Peter!

  • @allo-other
    @allo-other หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    If you are wondering why your live videos attract *much* fewer views than short, edited videos, it's a simple matter of *our* time.

  • @Alexlinnk
    @Alexlinnk หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    what an amazing guest. Great

  • @bartekjedrzejewski7594
    @bartekjedrzejewski7594 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    That's a great interview. Much more than I expected when clicking on the thumbnail.

  • @docopoper
    @docopoper หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I really like the approach of being non-interventionist. Forming a healthy democracy in a country is like a person gaining maturity, you really can't force it on people and will just make them mad at you if you try. Setting a good example and providing economic incentives seems like a much healthier method. De-risking from external countries also makes sense. Integration to prevent wars has worked well within the EU, and it does work generally to promote peace, but it's also a bit naive to pretend war can be prevented purely based on economic ties. And it is risky. Though to be fair trusting others always is and that doesn't mean it's bad to trust others.

    • @GetFochD
      @GetFochD หลายเดือนก่อน

      Its propaganda, maybe EU isn't interventionist but they rely for that on Nato. EU is unofficially a arm of Nato.

    • @GetFochD
      @GetFochD หลายเดือนก่อน

      De risking is just plain stupid and won't do shit

  • @CutieZalbu
    @CutieZalbu หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Good interview but save us sometime & chop it up! 1 hr live feels like a drag…..If I wanted that I’d go to CNN

  • @JennaHasm
    @JennaHasm หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Please add a thank you option.

    • @EUMadeSimple
      @EUMadeSimple  หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Hi @JennaHasm! Thank you so much for watching our livestream. If you're looking for a financial "thank you" button to support our channel, please make sure to check at our description. We have a "Buy me a coffee" page for 1 time donations or a Patreon page for a membership to our channel!

  • @MarktYertd
    @MarktYertd หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    I believe it may already be too late. Volkswagen's struggles with electric vehicle innovation, especially when compared to Japan, China, and the U.S., along with the widespread presence of U.S. military bases and Europe's lack of technological independence-unlike China and the U.S. with their tech giants-make it unlikely for Europe to change course. It seems Europe will continue to rely on U.S. protection.

    • @juanmartin1729
      @juanmartin1729 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ohh true, you are right

    • @CriticalPosthumanism
      @CriticalPosthumanism หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah, i see it the same way.
      Europe is on the way down, while US and China will be the big player in the future (maybe India much later).
      But we are already way too far behind.
      In 100 years countries like Germany will be like Turkey today. Exporting potatoes and vegetables.

    • @χσχσ-ν3χ
      @χσχσ-ν3χ หลายเดือนก่อน

      Future belong to Asia mainly china and india but USA will also be hanging around ​@@CriticalPosthumanism

    • @CriticalPosthumanism
      @CriticalPosthumanism หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@χσχσ-ν3χ doubt that tbh.
      Check 100 most valuable companies.
      Check most valuable tech companies.
      Check most advanced chip technology.
      Check most advanced AI technology.
      Thats all US
      And thats the future
      (TSMC is Taiwan but they are dependent on the US and do not sell their most advanced chips to China)

    • @errormatrix4159
      @errormatrix4159 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@CriticalPosthumanism Europe great problem is that it isn´t truly united, unfortunately member states still hold massive power, great poverty still exists in many states, and people migrate abroad, including to the USA, which about, the scientist community is around 30% or more, european.
      EU destined GDP is around 1% of total member state GDP, EU power is almost symbolic, and this is far too low.
      As a confederation/federation, with destined GDP of 25% to 50%, EU would thrive, quickly catch up, and be a "true" and hope so "positive" superpower.

  • @zeissiez
    @zeissiez หลายเดือนก่อน

    The EU just need to do a single thing, to be great again. Just one thing. Be sovereign from the power across the Atlantic.

  • @didixtar2863
    @didixtar2863 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The hubris of EU politicians is mind boggling 🤦🏻‍♂️ this buffoon talks like he knows better than every other non EU politician out there

  • @PedroMendes-ed2dl
    @PedroMendes-ed2dl หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    From someone that is working with foreign affairs, he’s a bit angry that the interviewer is not talking to him in Slovenian… wtf?? Dude, get used to talk in English because no one knows Slovenian outside Slovenia.

  • @patriciaholmes2659
    @patriciaholmes2659 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Way too much explanation of EU/Stano's role. Get to the subject in the title of the video already.

    • @EUMadeSimple
      @EUMadeSimple  หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Thank you for your feedback, will keep this in mind for the next interview! - Elliot

    • @makutarix1769
      @makutarix1769 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Agreed. I don't think the subject in the title of the video was even directly addressed. Which is shame, because I think the EU's place in an increasingly multipolar world is an important question. We cannot remain under the American umbrella forever.

  • @klowexodar
    @klowexodar หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Bonita propaganda os ha quedado

    • @GetFochD
      @GetFochD หลายเดือนก่อน

      El capullo dice mucho de desinformación de Russia pero despues repite propaganda genocida de Netanyahu. Que asque es la UE...

  • @garethbrown9191
    @garethbrown9191 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What makes the EU experts on foreign policy and why is it better than nation states that deal with the reality of foreign affairs?

    • @HappyCatholicDane
      @HappyCatholicDane หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      1. There is plenty of foreign policy expertise in the EU, but not more so than in a lot of other places. For example the EU doesn’t, as an organization, have the resources of the US federal government.
      2. It is isn’t about being “better”, but is a matter of scale. The EU member states are all small compared to the US and China. Divided, our influence on world affairs are bound to be very limited. More can be accomplished when acting in unison.

  • @Sayoo1
    @Sayoo1 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    American protectorate.