Thank you for the kind words Shane, nice to see this video. I will use this video as an opportunity to talk a bit about the whole Se leading and Se demo issues people have, not only the Se leading is CONCIOUS and the Se demo is UNCONCIOUS but there are also two important dichotomies that can make any typing much easier and should tell the difference between types like SLE and LSE fairly easily. That would be the Dynamic versus Static dichotomy, a Dynamic type is the classic wait and see type, observe a situation before acting, want to see how things are like in movement, while a Static types like Se base react quickly and respond to situations quickly, they are impulsive, there is a lack of this "wait and see" quality, in the movie Furiosa, we are introduced to young Furiosa and in the span of just a few minutes we can conclude she is a Static type due to her impulsive, quickly responding nature while someone like Immortan Joe being a good example of a Dynamic type, everyone around him rushes him into action and to make decisions and he waits, he wants to make sure how the situation looks, to understand it before acting in some impulsive fashion, he might be an LSE. So just this dichotomy makes LSE vs SLE typing very different, then we have the way our elements work, the Demo lacks the specific control of the leading as it is unconcious, many people make a mistake of seeing a lot of element and assuming it must mean it is "valued" or the "base", not only that but of course the definitions of Se are completely butchered if we look at classic socionics sources, any remotely aggressive and competitive person getting typed Se leading is proof of it.
@@courtjester3216 I appreciate this question because it gives me the opportunity to answer... No! I know I'm not extroverted; at least not in the social sense of the word. That's why, like I said in the video, when I meet people off the street and we're talking the cartoon 16 Personalities jargon, the best way to describe my personality in that arena is still ISTJ, and it will stay that way. But in Socionics, the terms extroversion and introversion mean something different than the common sense or popular meaning, or even the popular typology meaning of the word, so in Socionics I accept it (begrudgingly).
Thank you for the kind words Shane, nice to see this video.
I will use this video as an opportunity to talk a bit about the whole Se leading and Se demo issues people have, not only the Se leading is CONCIOUS and the Se demo is UNCONCIOUS but there are also two important dichotomies that can make any typing much easier and should tell the difference between types like SLE and LSE fairly easily.
That would be the Dynamic versus Static dichotomy, a Dynamic type is the classic wait and see type, observe a situation before acting, want to see how things are like in movement, while a Static types like Se base react quickly and respond to situations quickly, they are impulsive, there is a lack of this "wait and see" quality, in the movie Furiosa, we are introduced to young Furiosa and in the span of just a few minutes we can conclude she is a Static type due to her impulsive, quickly responding nature while someone like Immortan Joe being a good example of a Dynamic type, everyone around him rushes him into action and to make decisions and he waits, he wants to make sure how the situation looks, to understand it before acting in some impulsive fashion, he might be an LSE.
So just this dichotomy makes LSE vs SLE typing very different, then we have the way our elements work, the Demo lacks the specific control of the leading as it is unconcious, many people make a mistake of seeing a lot of element and assuming it must mean it is "valued" or the "base", not only that but of course the definitions of Se are completely butchered if we look at classic socionics sources, any remotely aggressive and competitive person getting typed Se leading is proof of it.
LSE sounds about right to me. Glad that the typing session went so well
bootlicker
LSE SP3!
Judging from how much you love Rusted, you are probably ILI. Or MBTI intj. Socionics Dualism in play…
I mean alright but Shane do you think you are extraverted?
@@courtjester3216 I appreciate this question because it gives me the opportunity to answer... No! I know I'm not extroverted; at least not in the social sense of the word. That's why, like I said in the video, when I meet people off the street and we're talking the cartoon 16 Personalities jargon, the best way to describe my personality in that arena is still ISTJ, and it will stay that way. But in Socionics, the terms extroversion and introversion mean something different than the common sense or popular meaning, or even the popular typology meaning of the word, so in Socionics I accept it (begrudgingly).