New Airbus A321XLR Upgrade Is The End Of Boeing! Here’s Why

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 70

  • @rtbrtb_dutchy4183
    @rtbrtb_dutchy4183 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    So many people making comments under these type videos how they don’t want to be cramped into a narrow body for long haul flying. How they feel like sardine in a can.
    The thing is, the seats aren’t going to be different from wide body long haul airplanes. Your personal space will be the same. So there is absolutely no difference. The only difference is that if you want to stretch your legs, you only have one isle and not 2. But most people don’t use both isles anyway.
    Some people will say that the cruise speed is slower and a flight will take longer. Which is true. However, boarding before departure and deplaning upon arrival goes a lot quicker with half the people. You also show up at immigration with half the people and bags get delivered quicker. So your lost 20 to 30 min of a slower cruise speed, will be made up with those other things.
    How do I know? I flew as a passenger on JetBlue on an LR from Europe to JFK. Boarding started 20 min before departure and we left on time. After arrival, from the moment we got to the gate, we got off the airplane, go through immigration and get my bags and being street side took less than 30 min.

    • @cainneachdaugherty7172
      @cainneachdaugherty7172 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Plus it also saves you the hassle of going through TSA at crowded US airports without sterile transit facilities.

    • @guiduz3469
      @guiduz3469 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It's not just about the isle, you have a whole lot of additional space to move around at the class sections. Besides, seats are not the same or they won't fit that many pax in it.

    • @The_Red_Squirrel
      @The_Red_Squirrel 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Also if you live on an isle as I do, they use of single aisle aircraft increases the number of destinations served by point to point flights, which is a good thing and saves a lot of time.

  • @syedputra5955
    @syedputra5955 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The extra fuel tank option should be extended to a320 snd a319 neos.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yep.

  • @flippert0
    @flippert0 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wider fuselage is nice, but airlines will always be tempted to cram more seats in it.

  • @Lucky0670
    @Lucky0670 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Most airlines has big orders for A321XLR..

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yep. A321XLR is trending now.

  • @DBEdwards
    @DBEdwards 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Let's just say fasten their seat belts. Boeing ramped deliveries in June but lost more than 100 net orders during that month. Boeing logged negative order activity in June due to moving orders for 116 aircraft out of its backlog and into a special accounting bucket reserved for deals the company suspects may not actually close. Jul 2024

  • @thomassharp2719
    @thomassharp2719 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Next is the Airbus A321-ULR.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The range of xlr is enough for impression. I think

    • @sebastianfloyd372
      @sebastianfloyd372 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@FLIGAVIAlonger, but not long enough. How the A321XLR is not long enough is it’s length it’s shape, it’s appearances and it’s not long enough to replace the 757-300

    • @sebastianfloyd372
      @sebastianfloyd372 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@FLIGAVIAthe reason why Airbus should make A321ULRs because it’s not about their range, it’s about their length

    • @sebastianfloyd372
      @sebastianfloyd372 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @thomassharp2719: A321ULR is fake, but unless they make it long like a 757-300 and as long as they have 4 doors in front, 4 over the wing, and 4 in back. And as long as they have more doors then the XLR

  • @RichardSevcech-hz3xu
    @RichardSevcech-hz3xu 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Air bus can build all

  • @joi-joibeans7911
    @joi-joibeans7911 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm big fan of airbus product and airspace in cabin

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Great!

  • @skirolf
    @skirolf 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How could you say that the extra fysejadw fuejtant doesn’t compromise the cargo caoacity?

    • @cainneachdaugherty7172
      @cainneachdaugherty7172 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Bring a carry on. It will also shorten turnaround times.

  • @joi-joibeans7911
    @joi-joibeans7911 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Single ail take over long haul flight from wide body like A 330, 380, and 350.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Which one do you like most?

  • @WillyVergara-k7n
    @WillyVergara-k7n 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    There are airlines do not benefit from A321XLR , like Delta , for long range , delta costumers like to fly on different large aircraft . So work for some airline , but not for all of them .

    • @rtbrtb_dutchy4183
      @rtbrtb_dutchy4183 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Of course it Will work for Delta. Image not needing the hub and spoke concept. Imagine being able to fly direct from, the smaller cities into Europe, without having to stop and switch planes in places like JFK or Chicago.

    • @cainneachdaugherty7172
      @cainneachdaugherty7172 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@rtbrtb_dutchy4183 Not to mention that US airports lack sterile transit facilities for international arrivals. It saves you several hours having to clear both CBP and TSA at a busy airport.

    • @The_Red_Squirrel
      @The_Red_Squirrel 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      As long as Delta continues to operate long haul exclusively with twin aisle aircraft, it opens up opportunities for the likes of Aer Lingus to add new destinations to its long haul network offering point to point service.

  • @Beni-fr4of
    @Beni-fr4of 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Boeing just confirmed the 797

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Is it new?

    • @LOLOVAL-os3pq
      @LOLOVAL-os3pq 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      it's just a concept!! it doesn't fly at all, and given Boeing's problems with these 737s, your project is still far from dethroning Aibus' plane LOL

    • @sebastianfloyd372
      @sebastianfloyd372 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@LOLOVAL-os3pq797 is a fake concept, it should be retired

  • @A2-C-w8l
    @A2-C-w8l 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Good-bye airbus

    • @9255cris
      @9255cris 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      bye bye to you mate

  • @danielgriffiths8754
    @danielgriffiths8754 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    7:07 7:09

  • @javkhlanbaatarkhuu4271
    @javkhlanbaatarkhuu4271 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Boeing will come back. But their blunder really put them in the hard second place in aviation market. Until new engine design which burns significantly lower fuel than NEO engines, Boeing will struggle.

  • @nabilisur9566
    @nabilisur9566 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The new AIRBUS A321xlr upgrade for the end of BOEING ? Yep, That's it ! I heard about Haji Isam buy BOEING Business Jet 737 but he choose on MAX 7. Not BOEING 737 NG or the safest private jet plane is AIRBUS CORPORATE JETS now it makes my feeling not very nice for him. I must say "NO MORE" BOEING 737 MAX for Indonesia 🇮🇩 as the world's biggest muslim population country ever ☪️ and I must say "MORE" AIRBUS for Indonesia 🇮🇩 as the world's biggest muslim population country ever ☪️ over the BOEING for the future of developed country ever for Indonesia on 2045 years later.

  • @markcarter3552
    @markcarter3552 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    you can have that. no thanks , I like more room for 9 hours

    • @dewyakana1543
      @dewyakana1543 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Boeing would still be blaming pilots for MCAS, if not for other countrys grounding that crap..... sorry, craft.

    • @rtbrtb_dutchy4183
      @rtbrtb_dutchy4183 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Seats are the same. You don’t have extra room in a wide body. So what is the difference?

    • @cainneachdaugherty7172
      @cainneachdaugherty7172 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@dewyakana1543 Fun fact is that the investigators blamed the pilots for not handling the runaway trim correctly and not turning back at first sign of trouble. In addition to poor maintenance leading to the problem in the first place.

  • @Plane-Ship-Lover
    @Plane-Ship-Lover 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    It's not "the end" of Boeing, some airlines are loyal to Boeing and plus the A321XLR isn't perfect

    • @barracuda7018
      @barracuda7018 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Boeing bagged more orders than Airbus at Farnborough...😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
      How its possibly for a company that is going out of businees soon...There are so many idiots making so many stupid comments...
      These morons dont realize that the end of Boeing means 200 % price increase of every Airbus plane on the market. Its called monopoly...Take or leave it..

    • @sfalpha
      @sfalpha 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes it's not the end, but big loss and will hard to recover.
      I think they also give a huge discount on 787/777x before to get order bus some are cancelling 777x now.

    • @dewyakana1543
      @dewyakana1543 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@barracuda7018 what? On what certified aircrap? Orders will be canceled, just like Boeing.

    • @drevil2675
      @drevil2675 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Boeing fans have no shame .

    • @neilpickup237
      @neilpickup237 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No argument there, the A321xlr isn't perfect. Unfortunately for Boeing, they don't have anything better, in fact, they just don't have anything at all to compete with the XLR.

  • @guiduz3469
    @guiduz3469 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Flying more than four hours in an A321? Buckle up, because if you're not Indigo-level indifferent, it's gonna feel like a sardine can with wings. Tight and cramped doesn't even begin to cover it.

    • @rickwhite4137
      @rickwhite4137 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Do you've a weight problem?

    • @rtbrtb_dutchy4183
      @rtbrtb_dutchy4183 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      How? Seats are the same as on a wide body. Actually, with a 3-3-3 or 3-4-3 layout, I’d say it’s even worse than a single isle.

    • @guiduz3469
      @guiduz3469 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@rickwhite4137 I'm 5'11" and rather slim

    • @guiduz3469
      @guiduz3469 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@rtbrtb_dutchy4183 an A321 is just longer than an A320. If you can imagine yourself in such a cabin for more than 4 hrs good for you...

    • @rtbrtb_dutchy4183
      @rtbrtb_dutchy4183 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@guiduz3469 yet your personal space in your seat is the same as a wide body aircraft. Actually, the A320/321 has a bit wider seats than wide body aircraft at 18 inches versus 17 inches. So you actually have more space.