วีดีโอ

I agree. But what about the ❤ between the countries?

Awesome. 👍🇺🇸💪🤙🙏🤝😊. I love this channel. Awesome Thank you. Merry Christmas to everyone.

Turkish Airlines learn from Qantas ! Nonstop Istanbul to Mel/Syd ? Turkish flying to 120 countries.

I didn’t realise Airbus built jet engines…..that is what you would think watching this bot generated video.

Remember how hydropower failed for the Hindenburg?

1

MRTT Plus, good luck with engine maintenance :)

Firstly, Boeing crashes. Secondly, Airbus cannot supply the demand. Lastly, COMAC is certified @1:06 . If it's uncertified, it'll not be in commercial operation. Like EVs, Chinese COMAC will overtake Boeing and Airbus, it's just a matter of time. Like EV quality and innovative technology, it's by far superior in comparison to Boeing's crashing 737s and on par if not better than Airbus.......but you'll not hear this from Western Propaganda and China-Bad Influencers like this BS video uploader.

Even the AIRBUS A330 mrtt, AIRBUS A400m, AIRBUS fighter plane, AIRBUS Helicopter, HELI AKS, H225 M and Rafale's fighter plane that have "HUGE UPGRADE" can be shocked the Military industry as the same think like Embraer's "HUGE UPGRADE" on C-390 and the video as I already saw it yesterday from @FLIGAVIA about video title named "Every Nation Wants The AIRBUS A330 mrtt than BOEING KC-46" where that video make me deal it.

You see the "hard points" under the wings. Make it a flying fortress

hybis comes before the fall BO(E)ING!

Kc390 is the best

Even AI didn't get some facts right. All current A330MRTT operators didn't order the main deck cargo capability of an A330F because all assessed capacity of the lower cargo hold is enough for them. KC-46 has no lower cargo hold due to fuel tanks located there. E.g. military 463L palette capacity for a KC-46 is 18 but an A330MRTT can carry 32 with main deck cargo handling as offered for KC-X competition. This also goes for the integrated communication systems for Boeing's KC-46 which are not built by Boeing. So Airbus KC-45 would have received the same systems for US service. Why 463L pallets then your A330 can handle LD3 containers like a Boeing 747? There is a reason why Boeing did built the 787. The 767 wasn't competitive against the old A330. Now the A330neo is here and competitive even against the 787. The US Air Force did choose the A330 over the 767 due to range needed in the Pacific but was overruled by politicians. Why Japan and Italy ordered the KC-46 in the first place is quite reasonable. Both countries built a huge chunk of the 767 like Japan still does for the 787. The reason why Italy will now order A330 is quite easy to understand: price, capability and spare parts. Civil production of 767 will cease in 2027 due to ICAO emission regulations. On the other hand you can get spare parts for an A330 everywhere in the world. Italy may just join the Tanker Transport Fleet of the European Defence Agency and buy shares for additional A330 tanker aircraft. US Air Force still needs the range and offload capabilities of a KC-10. Even A330MRTT was able to offload more fuel at range than a KC-10. Maximum Take Of Weight for A330neo did rise from 233 t for A330ceo to 251 t with more range than an MD-11.

This is such a waste of time, this video is so annoyingly lazy using obviously AI generated narration that is illogical, disjointed and super repetitive using lots of words without actually saying anything. What a shit video

3 - Airbus

This news is only 5 years old.

Are you the seller?

:D ridiculous arguments, writen for Boeing's. Boeing is good brand with great engineers - then show us Europeans you don't need a US nationalist sustain with references to Nato etc. to make the best systems! Selling is - first - making a competitive product. By the ways, largest wingspan can lead to less consumption...

Good for Qantas. How can you trust Boeing when they don’t care about safety anymore?

Definitely Airbus

1

Qatar never wanted the Max they done it to spite airbus with the A350 saga and it backed fired in Qatar

Sorry but the best is the A340-600, with all the restrooms down in the belly.

More Airbus promos. The A-330 is OLD now.

Thank you something that media can't show

I could not have crafted a better & more "informative" Air Bus commercial.

What black guy?... :/

And now that the U.S. citizenry choose that BLOVIATED ORANGE SHIT STAIN to be their DEER LEADER, has had nothing to do with those types of decisions.

Originally The US chose the A330 Tanker to replace the KC135, but it was quashed Senator McCain who wanted to buy a US made aircraft. Enter the 767 derivative.

Just like in land based vehicles, is it beneficial to have aircraft to use electric driven “Engines” by using a hybrid system where 1 engine creates the electric power to drive the rest and possibly charge a battery system onboard to reduce fuel consumption immensely, while improving performance, lowering weight and reducing costs.

Which genius decided that this long list of facts, figures and numbers would be best delivered by another ghastly text-to-speech robot narrator? Luckily, by the time I woke up the video had ended. 👎

Do a story on the Airbus A330neo-800 jet.

It looks to me that Italy must comply to European bid procedures and for that reason the purgage has been halted.

military aviation or civil aviation, it's the same thing, you have to stop your propaganda! and frankly, the quality Boeing must have been lost in the limbs of easy fric, a reminder, the B737 max is not a good plane for passengers, they have already killed! per million flights, Airbuses had far fewer serious accidents LOL

mc1 hasent killed people unlike the 737 that might or might not kill you!

Boeing traded their safety and quality..for a short term profit……NEVER a good idea !!!!

This is just another boeing advertisement..🙄…😴😴😴😴😴😴😴

Airbus & Boeing the two aerospace giants that's amazing.

Korean air force acquired 4 Airbus A330 MRTT's on 2018-19 over Boeing KC-46. And they are very satisfied with A330 MRTT for its performance and versatility. They were used even for civilian evacuation mission in the Middle East. The acquisition is considered as one of the best recent aircraft procurement decision by Korean air force. Highly recommended.

The KC-46 was hamstrung when the USAF insisted that the refuelling was to be done remotely instead of the onboard boom operator. This major change had the outcome of changes to the total fuel management and the installation of remote AV support for the mission. The A330 had boom problems actually loosing 2? inflight!

This is a bit of a sales pitch for Boeing. Even says the 767 is FBW when the reality is the other way around. The A330 is vastly superior and would be use by the USAF is America wasn't so corrupt (It did win in a fair competition).

Canada went with A330. Converting a used A330 is a better option for many countries

The A330 MRTT would be more versatile if they had full-sized cargo doors on the upper deck. Hard to say the A330 MRTT is "dominating" when they've only sold a couple dozen of them, while the KC-46 has orders for almost 200.

I've been love to hear about AIRBUS' new secret weapon for the future.

Boeing is being KILLED by their unions with their demands and lack of performance. In fact, IF the trend continues, the Boeing employee will demand themselves out of a job !!!!!!!

Well one thing wrong here is that the A330MRTT was flying operationally and successfully before the USAF contract was floated. And becasue it was a flying aircraft rather than a CGI it won on every test. And then Boeing's paid Senators stepped in, cancelled the contract and forced a rerun on a very narrow specification. So Airbus and their partner said 'No Thanks'. The KC-46 is a typical 'post 1999 Boeing' boondoggle.

Smart. Boeing screwed up again. Build the 757 and scrap the 737

My guess, Everybody knows Boeing aircraft comes with possible sanction tag attached!

Not every nation wants the A330 MRTT. How many nations are there?

Boeing oiled their revolving doors in Washington