The history of all Chinese, Tungusic, Korean, Japanese, Mongolian, Turkic, Vietnamese and European states within the boundaries of political and cultural East Asia.
docs.google.com/document/d/1iCwWG60jRTwKtSaoVaWQKqsVfkLqKEvx2GD8_KItfrU/edit?usp=sharing Here is the timeline document I wrote for this video, maybe it can help with your History of the World 2.0 video too. Although keep in mind that some of the details are missing, so for those you should probably watch the video at half speed or slower so you don't miss anything
OMG U COMMENT THIS THIS IS WAY BETTER THAN TIGERSTAR'S VERSION OF EAST ASIA IM HAPPY THAT THE DRAGON HISTORIAN IS DOING MY COUNTRYS STORY DETAILY (china) and im not from that stooped mainland im from hk
Sorry for the really really long wait. But it's finally here! I hope you guys enjoy :) I also apologize that the video looks somewhat out of focus (that's the best way I can describe it). I had to cut down the quality a little bit while rendering the video in Premiere Pro and then TH-cam butchered it. Even the colors were modified slightly, for example Russia is supposed to be a much darker shade of green, etc. Anyway, I hope that doesn't get in your way of watching the video. EDIT: It seems like the colors are back to normal now, I guess it just took TH-cam really long to process the whole thing. The out-of-focusy feel is still there though. Thank you guys for watching regardless! EDIT: I just noticed a mistake that I made, Mongolia after 1992 should be just "Mongolia," not the Mongolian People's Republic.
Awesome! I can see the overloaded amount of effort put into this video and mostly accurate. Just a little flaw that I found. ( 4:08 ) I believe that Anxi Protectorate of Tang was taken over by the Tibetan Empire (吐蕃) instead of the Uyghurs. Gansu area was only to be able to be back into Tang's hand due to internal turmoil of Tibet later on and the Uyghurs gained respective Independences soon after. Example Reference: /watch?v=-foZ5RcCm8U (13:06 - 13:58) What do you think?
Hi! I'm glad that you enjoyed the video. At 4:08, I showed that the Anxi Protectorate got destroyed by a nation not inside the scope of this map - i.e. the Tibetan Empire. However, I did show Gansu being taken over by the Uyghur Khanate. Is that what you were pointing out?
Oh, OK my bad it looked like Uyghurs took over the area from the Gansu pathway so I thought they were the ones that later took over Tarim Basin. It makes sense now.
Absolutely Amazing work as always! However, one nitpick, you forgot the three kingdoms of 14th century Okinawa; Chuzan Hokuzan, and Nanzan, which split the island until 1429, when the Ryukyu kingdom comes in, but other than that, I see no problems. One question though, I noticed that during the Sengoku, you showed many of the Japanese clans and the Ikko-Ikki as seperate entities from the Ashikaga government, were these actually independent states? I always assumed they were all subservient to the central government, but warring among st themselves.
Thanks for telling me about the three kingdoms of Okinawa! I really had no idea. As for the Sengoku Period, I like to think it as similar to the Warlord Era in China. Just like many of the warlord cliques were fighting for control of the Beiyang Government in Beijing, the clans were fighting for control of Kyoto. Therefore, whichever clan was in control of Kyoto at the time was shown as the Ashikaga Shogunate in the video.
some mistake： 1 Dong ou what appear in 190 BCE in this ，it was established by Yue as their fedual subject in 472 BCE ，after Yue annex Wu，they had too many land ，so Yue‘s king establish the subject manage south land. but Dong ou was survived after Chu annex Yue until Han combine their in 138 BCE. 2 when the Ming rise , he met Chen Youliang ， Zhang Shicheng and another enemy clique，but they haven't appear in the time.
As a Mongol, It looks pretty faultless to my knowledge of history. Except the northern yuan dynasty was basically divided between right wing and left wing. Khalkhas and Southern Mongols (Chahar, khorchin etc..). I'm referring to it because you decided to split four oirats which I think is a good decision.
Some missing pieces...Indo-europan Yuezhi/Tocharians in early history and the Qiang and Tubo(early Tibetan) people who were major players at different periods in history. The areas in modern day Qinghai and Tibet was not a black hole, there were some powerful kingdoms there throughout history.
You're right, but it appears the video creator left out everything west of China on purpose. As you might notice, the Empire of Tibet is never shown, nor is anything else in the western parts of the map. These regions are only included when East Asian powers conquer them. With the amount of detail he put into making this video, it's evident that this is not a mistake, but rather a choice of preference to only include East Asian history (although whether or not Tibet and the Tarim Basin are/aren't East Asia is debatable).
Usually, the East Asian culture sphere involves the people mentioned in this video. Sure, Tibetans are distantly related to Sinitic, same as Burmese, but they are usually only seen as tangentially part of it
@@NIDELLANEUM yes. But the other hand Tibet is culturally and, most importantly, ethnically/genetically close to Eastern Asia rather than India or Turkic countries. But yeah the cool thing about us is that we made our own and singular culture, independent from others.
It's like Troy, some thing really was there, but people are not sure about if it is really called Troy back then, same with Xia, it could have a different name at, because the Shang after it was also called Yin...
@@riza-2396 that's not entirely accurate. Shang was the name of the country, Yin was the name of the people who ruled it. In the case of Xia, the people who ruled the country were called the Xiahous. I'm pretty sure the video owner put the question mark there because there is actually no archaeological evidence that this country even existed.
@@アヤミ No you are totally wrong, Yin is not the name of the people who ruled it, the people are just Shang people. Yin is the capital city of the later half of Shang dynasty, it is famous because Pangeng's decision of moving the capital city to Yin brought prosperity to Shang. Xiahou is also not the ruler of Xia, the ruler has 2 titles, before Qin Shi Huangdi it was Wang, translated to King, after him it was Huangdi or just Huang or Di, translated to emperor. The rulers of Xia, Shang and Zhou are all Wang, translated to King. Xiahou is a family name, meaning the Hou of Xia, Hou is a kind of nobel in ancient China. The Zhou dynasty had 5 levels of nobles: Gong, Hou, Bo, Zi, Nan. This is different depending on different dynasties. When Zhou defeated Shang, Xia people were settled in Qi(it's qǐ not qí), the ruler of Qǐ changed from Hou to Gong and then to Hou and then to Bo, at the end Qǐ was annexed by Chu, the refugees of Qǐ immigrated to Lu, the Gong of Lu honoured them as Hou of Xia because the ancestors of those people. Which leads to the family name Xiahou. Also those are actually Shi, not Xing, the Xing are the original family names, but when population grows, split branches of families used Shi as their family names because there are too many people from the same families and it's hard to distinguish smaller branches. The Xing of ruler of Xia was Si, one of the eight oldest family names, their Shi was Xiahou, but it is not the same "hou" of Xiahou as the later ones from Qǐ, it's 后hòu not 侯hóu during the Xia dynasty. Xing and Shi only existed differently before Qin Shi Huangdi, after him Xing and Shi are the same meaning, just family names.
제 영상에서 수정하고 싶었던 부분들까지 이 영상에 있는 것을 보고 좋았습니다. 아무래도 님의 영상도, 저의 영상도한반도 부분이 비교적 세밀하게 나오고 그 외 지역은 상세하지 못 한 것이 한계인 듯 합니다 ^^;;궁금한 부분이 있는데 1880년경 조선이 청나라 색깔로 표시되는 것은 어째서 인가요?청나라의 간섭 때문인가요? 결국 청일전쟁이 조선에 벌어질 정도로 두 나라 사이에서 고전했다고는 하지만엄연히 독립된 국가였는데 말이죠.
+The Dragon Historian 임오군란 때 파병의 댓가로 맺은 조약의 내용은 상행위와 관련된 내용이었습니다. 속국이라는 표현 하나로 조선이 청나라의 영토가 되는것은 아니죠. 조선은 청나라와의 불평등조약 이후 다른 서양 제국주의 열강들과도 조약들을 맺습니다. 독자적인 외교권이 있었죠. 또한, 청나라는 조선에 대한 간섭으로 우위를 보이려 했지만 일본을 필두로 러시아, 미국, 영국 등 다른나라들이 인정하지 않았습니다. 조선 내 친청파,친러파,친일파 등의 세력 간 힘겨루기가 있었구요. 단지 조청조약의 한 단어로 조선이 청나라 땅인 것으로 하는 것은 잘못되었습니다. 오히려 그 문구는 조공관계를 가지고 조선 종주권으로 확대해석 주장했던 청나라의 바람이었죠. 조선이 청의 속국이 아니었고 다른 나라들도 조선을 청의 속국으로 여기지않았으니까요.
@@TheDragonHistorian 만약에 조선이 청의 속국이었다면 국기를 정할때 청의 조언대로 청나라의 국기와 똑같이 정하고 색만 다르게 함으로써 청의 속국이었음을 드러내지 않았을까요? 하지만 고종은 청의 마젠창의 제안을 거절하고 조선만의 독자적인 국기를 정했습니다. 이것만으로도 조선은 독립국가였다는 증거가 될 수 있고요 또 당시에 조선은 관세의 개념조차 없었을정도로 국제사회의 인식이 희박했습니다. 서구열강과의 조약중 하나에서 청나라가 원하는대로 속국표시를 했다고 속국으로 취급되는것은 이상하다고 생각합니다. 그리고 민비정권의 가장 큰 뒷배가 청나라였고 임오군란에서도 국왕이 위기를 느끼고 청나라에 도움을 요청한 것이지 그걸로 속국이라고 취급할 수 없다고 생각합니다.
@@msmmoa8935 청나라의 의도를 보면 알 수 있죠. 당시 19세기 청나라는 서구 국가들한테 뒤져라 처맞던 상태여서 자신들의 영토를 뺏기지 않기 위해 전까지는 그냥 자기들 영토에서 살게 냅뒀던 위구르지역도 신장이라는 이름을 대며 속국화 시켰습니다. 조선도 이와 다를바 없어요.
"Proto-Ainu" is an odd way of referring to the peoples of the Japanese archipelago in the ancient past. The more widely accepted term across disciplines is simply "Jomon peoples"
You're right, but the distinction is still valid. While all pre-Yayoi inhabitants of the Japanese islands are considered Jomon people, genetic and historical evidence has revealed that the Jomon were not a heterogenous group. Despite sharing many cultural similarities, Jomon people from northern Japan and Jomon people from southern Japan also had plenty of differences. Jomon remains from Ryukyu and Kyushu are genetically very different from Jomon remains from Hokkaido and Tohoku. The southern Jomon were more closely related to early continental East Asians and Taiwanese aboriginals, and the northern Jomon were more closely related to coastal Paleolithic Siberian groups. And what we know of their cultures from archeological, oral, and written historical evidence backs that up: While southern Jomon society was semi-agricultural and in part matriarchal with female chieftains and priestess cults, the northern Jomon were primarily hunter-gatherers who were less matriarchal, more tribal, and practiced a more nature-heavy form of animism. So yeah, it's good to separate the two Jomon cultures, but I also agree that calling them "Jomon" and "Proto-Ainu" is not the best choice of names. "Northern Jomon" and "Southern Jomon" would work just fine.
Amazing from China, Japan, Korea (North And South), Mongolia, Russian Far East, Tibet, Taiwan, Manchuria, Perhaps parts of Vietnam and maybe a few others have very fascinating articles of recordings
@@rete5132 Taiwan is not China. Taiwan was originally an independent country and was inhabited by indigenous people. After the Dutch colonization began and the Japanese Zheng Chenggong drove out the Dutch, Han Chinese from the mainland began to migrate. After that, Jurchen ruled Taiwan, but the Japanese Empire destroyed the Qing dynasty and Taiwan was annexed by Japan.
@@yidminselaks Taiwan was taken over by the Kuomintang government of the Republic of China. Currently, most Taiwanese speak Chinese due to the Han Chinese assimilation policy, but ethnically speaking, more than 80% are non-Han Chinese.
Few Noticeable Errors: Han dynasty’s western territories location seems off, you showed the territory in the middle of taklamakan desert, it should be more north than that. Tang dynasty had more western territories, because they had fought wars in Persia. Dzungaria had Aksai-Chin region, because that’s the only way they can take to control Tibet (Dzungaria and Tibet was separated by Kunlun mountain, the eastern end of Kunlun was controlled by Qing dynasty which is the enemy of Dzungaria. The only way the can have control on Tibet is through Aksai-Chin)
I'm from Sakha Republic (North-Eastern Siberia). We originated from Baikal territory but migrated to the north, theoretically in the past we were the small part of Xiongnu confederation. We have turkic, mongolic and tungusic in our bloods. Historically our enemies were Chinese, but I wish one time we will make a big union of East Asian people. Respect to our East Asian blood brothers, expecially for Korea because I like your country very much and I've been there for many times. Remember, we have the real chance to control the whole World. China, Korea, Japan, Mongolia, Manchuria and others, we will rule this world.
Maybe someday you guys have your own country and will be known as nordic countries in Asia far east because of your geography, culture, and looks of the people. You guys in siberia are the palest asians.
koreans are from baikal as well. We always had many proverbs about the lake and it's funny that the scientist tests a genetic squence found in a cave near Baikal. and the gene was closest to korean people. I am serious. I think Koreans were the true genes or people of baikal immigrated 7000 years ago. and still have the gene unlike other mongolic people. mongolians are now diverse. They share chinese white middle eastern blood.
pozk 16661 there are no such a enemy at all since it is a more than 2000 years journey with couples of Dynasties have been destroyed,the main blood of Huns,tungusic and mongols(even the golden blood of khan) are all mixed with Chinese Han people. The ancestor you mentioned are basically Chinese now, and you can not even tell from they looks . It’s like in the Roma age, Greek and Latin Roman people are enemy,but after hundreds years, the main people of Roma(Byzantine) are Greek people.
I feel many kingdom you showed is not right. Like Yuan and Qing. It is not Sinitic. It is Han Chinese being invaded. Your map feels like it is governed by two ethnicities together which might make people feel Han Chinese are always invaded others.
Jialun Yang Yes. Yuan is created and ruled by Mongols and Qing is created and ruled by Manchus. But he did it because the rulers have went cery deep into chinese culture
fk sad turkic trying to made japan and korea are they sibling lel cause they are shameful of they own turkic origin which who get invade by the real turk then fuck they woman then made the men watch and belive that the one fucking they wife are they brother ( which is not cause the turk are outsider who come to invade the now day turk land who the native are not turk lol )
@@batukaganbat6093 they are no relaitve nation sbut they are share COMMON Origin in Sibira . Black Poeples: Banthu Peoples: South african , Tanzanian , Mozambiq, Madagascar and Kenyan Aborgines ( Black-White mix) : Niger-Congo (West) Peoples: Nigeria, Gabon,Congo,Senegal Eastern Aborgines : Dravidians( souh hinduistan ),Thamils,Sinotics(today chinese)Thai,Vietnamse,Malays,Australians and ınca peoples Early Farmers ( Mosttl white butt have black people features) : Semitic (West) Peoples : Eagptians, Magreps, Arabs and oher Malta,Sudan,Mouritania peoples Hamitic (East) Peoples : Some anatolian and middle east nations, Armenians and some caucasians, Mezopotamian, Judens . White Peoples: Indo Peoples (West) : Indians, Persians,Hellanic,Celts Siberian Peoples ( East) : Americans native,Peleo sibirians,Tıbet-Jomons,Yenısey(Zhao,Wei),Koreans,Tungus,Altaic,Ural peoples .
No 😂 weiman was a Yan dynasty remnant. After the han dynasty conquered the Yan dynasty, weiman fled to gojoseon where he showed the king there how to use iron, and became a general. He then overthrew the king of gojoseon and ruled it for himself.
What are you talking about? According to 史記 and 魏略, Wiman came from Yan dynasty who became a ruler of Gojoseon by wearing 'Gojoseon clothes'('胡服', '蠻夷' in real document tho). In other words, Gojoseon existed before Wiman, and he surrendered the Gojoseon 'King Jun(準王)' and became king. What you said is a big logical leap and not a fun fact. If you are Chinese, find and read objective books and face the truth.
Pretty well done! Respect! It gives quite a good chronology. Some errors: 1) Naimans, Tatars, Khereids, Khamag Mongols/Borjigin were all Mongolic tribes, not actually Turkic. They all spoke the same language and Tatars on the Mongolian Steppes have not much to do with Tatarstan today or Tatars in Crime or Siberian Tatars. Just the name Tatar was bestowed to the Turkic tribes later. The name Tatar is the most wrongly used name in the history. Sometimes mixing with the word Tartaria. 2) Dinling was not Turkic, according to the recent research findings. They were Scythian/Indo-European with Tagar Culture, like Sogdians. But nowadays everyone claims all the old tribes as theirs. Pity for the historical science. Dinling was simply assimilated into neighboring the Turkic tribes and Mongolic Xianbei.
Korean history dates back to Goryeo. The indigenous people of the Korean Peninsula and the Japanese archipelago were the Jomon people, and the Yayoi people who came from southern China and the Jomon people mixed little by little, and the Yamato people were born. The Yamato people (Wajin) of Kyushu lived in the southern part of the Korean peninsula, and the Han people lived in the northern part of the Korean peninsula. However, as the Tungusic tribe called Buyeo invaded the Liaodong Peninsula, the Han people fled to the south and interbred with the Wa people, giving birth to the Korean people. In terms of genetics, Han + Japanese + Tungus = modern Korean DNA. People who fled to Japan after the collapse of Baekje and Goguryeo had the genes of the Han O2 lineage.
@@user-hn4qr8ty6f yeah the genetic/historic relationship between Korea and japan is similar to that of Turkey and Greece and I feel like there’s a huge misconception about the two peoples having a common origin. The first people to inhabit the Korean Peninsula were japonic speaking peoples with a similar genetic makeup to modern Japanese people until the proto koreanic speakers arrived from the steppe assimilating with them creating the modern Korean ethnicity. Modern Koreans = Tungus/mongol/Siberian tribes + yayoi agriculturalist. Modern Japanese = Yayoi agriculturalist + Jomon + austronesian tribes. The genetics of both nations cluster greatly from sharing the same agricultural yayoi component due to assimilation but have separate ethno linguistic origins
Wouldn't the Proto-Mongols have been further east, somewhere around northeastern China and far eastern Russia? The lands of present-day Mongolia were the center of several major Turkic confederations before the Mongolic-speaking peoples arrived on the scene, so it makes sense that the Proto-Turkic peoples were there and the Proto-Mongolic peoples were to their east. I've always been partial to the idea that the Xiongnu were Proto-Turkic and the Xianbei were proto-Mongolic.
@@Orgil. That's inconclusive. The prevailing theory is that the Xiongnu (Huns) were proto-Turkic, just like the groups that immediately followed them like the Gokturks and the Old Uyghurs. The Xianbei, located further to the east, were proto-Mongolic and moved in to fill the avoid after the proto-Turkic peoples moved out into Central Asia and Siberia.
![THE TOYS x NONT TANONT - ดอกไม้ที่รอฝน (spring) [Official MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/pPa1d5cC8M4/mqdefault.jpg)
I don't know why I haven't seen this until now, I can't put into words how useful this is.
I'm glad I was able to help!
docs.google.com/document/d/1iCwWG60jRTwKtSaoVaWQKqsVfkLqKEvx2GD8_KItfrU/edit?usp=sharing
Here is the timeline document I wrote for this video, maybe it can help with your History of the World 2.0 video too. Although keep in mind that some of the details are missing, so for those you should probably watch the video at half speed or slower so you don't miss anything
***** That's perfect, thanks for sharing.
OMG U COMMENT THIS THIS IS WAY BETTER THAN TIGERSTAR'S VERSION OF EAST ASIA IM HAPPY THAT THE DRAGON HISTORIAN IS DOING MY COUNTRYS STORY DETAILY (china) and im not from that stooped mainland im from hk
Confucius Ideology Video Book th-cam.com/video/cJqtUPu3woE/w-d-xo.html
3:39 That goes so perfect with the music xD
sui China collapse
lol
Agree😂😂
Weeeeew
Sorry for the really really long wait. But it's finally here! I hope you guys enjoy :)
I also apologize that the video looks somewhat out of focus (that's the best way I can describe it). I had to cut down the quality a little bit while rendering the video in Premiere Pro and then TH-cam butchered it. Even the colors were modified slightly, for example Russia is supposed to be a much darker shade of green, etc. Anyway, I hope that doesn't get in your way of watching the video.
EDIT: It seems like the colors are back to normal now, I guess it just took TH-cam really long to process the whole thing. The out-of-focusy feel is still there though. Thank you guys for watching regardless!
EDIT: I just noticed a mistake that I made, Mongolia after 1992 should be just "Mongolia," not the Mongolian People's Republic.
xianghou bc 1000 or 500 born in .
Mongol = Turk We are Altaic people . Ok You make mongol and Turk but you forgive alot Turkic dynsty and country
sorry，I have opinion of you.You're a typical Korean，it's complete ignorance for West of ancient China（central Asia）and the Tibetan Empire（Stress）.
ı now.
:D
Great Video!
very well made
very useful
Such a Great Clip! Thanks for sharing such a nice work with us. Must took a bunch of time making this video.
이 사람 한국인이에요 ㅋㅋ
Can you please do an updated video on this?
I’m so curious to see how each language family displaced the other
현대 사학에서 납득할만한편이네요 유튜브에서 만들어진 영상중에선 가장 좋습니다.
Thanks! You`re very good at eastasia history! (I`m Korean)
Fantastic work! Any chance you'll do a map like this for South East Asia?
Very useful video and excellently made with some top notch songs in it which attracted me to it.
발해 부흥운동까지 정확히 표현하신 게 대단하네요...ㄷㄷ
ㅇㅈ ㅋㅋㅋ 정안은 한국인도 잘 모르던데,,
ㅇㅈ
발해운동은 요사같은데 나오는걸로암
정안국은 물론이고 소고구려도 있음
뭐 몇년이면 몰라도 거의 반세기 이상 눌러박힌 나라라서
이런거 만드는거는 역시 이분이 갑인듯 하다
Thank you for sharing. I do love it.
와우 잘 보겠습니다.. 드래곤님 요즘은 뭐 하시는지요. 오늘 드래곤님 영상들을 접하게 되었는데 다 공부하고 싶어요. 감사합니다.
정말 잘 만든 영상입니다 역사 덕후에게 성지가 될 듯 싶네요
great video.
thank you very much
from Mongol
Batuka Ganbat One of my favorite empires is Mongolian
Love Mongol from Vietnam.
@台灣友邦計數器 hi
love mongol from China
蒙古属于东亚吗？😂这里的东亚更多是指文化方面的东亚吧，不然怎么会让越南这个东南亚国家进入东亚历史，就是俗称筷子文化圈或者儒家文化圈。
蒙古应该归入内亚游牧文化历史圈，蒙古应该是和突厥人，哈萨克人这些游牧民族一起的历史。从文化圈来说，蒙古不应该归入东亚，毕竟这些国家历史上都曾用过汉字，蒙古用的是维吾尔人创造的文字
Very nice!
Awesome! I can see the overloaded amount of effort put into this video and mostly accurate.
Just a little flaw that I found.
( 4:08 ) I believe that Anxi Protectorate of Tang was taken over by the Tibetan Empire (吐蕃) instead of the Uyghurs. Gansu area was only to be able to be back into Tang's hand due to internal turmoil of Tibet later on and the Uyghurs gained respective Independences soon after. Example Reference: /watch?v=-foZ5RcCm8U (13:06 - 13:58)
What do you think?
Hi! I'm glad that you enjoyed the video. At 4:08, I showed that the Anxi Protectorate got destroyed by a nation not inside the scope of this map - i.e. the Tibetan Empire. However, I did show Gansu being taken over by the Uyghur Khanate. Is that what you were pointing out?
Oh, OK my bad it looked like Uyghurs took over the area from the Gansu pathway so I thought they were the ones that later took over Tarim Basin. It makes sense now.
Where did you get the music for your videos from? They're pretty catchy
Maplestory bgm
Shanghai waitan!
Absolutely Amazing work as always!
However, one nitpick, you forgot the three kingdoms of 14th century Okinawa; Chuzan Hokuzan, and Nanzan, which split the island until 1429, when the Ryukyu kingdom comes in, but other than that, I see no problems.
One question though, I noticed that during the Sengoku, you showed many of the Japanese clans and the Ikko-Ikki as seperate entities from the Ashikaga government, were these actually independent states? I always assumed they were all subservient to the central government, but warring among st themselves.
Thanks for telling me about the three kingdoms of Okinawa! I really had no idea.
As for the Sengoku Period, I like to think it as similar to the Warlord Era in China. Just like many of the warlord cliques were fighting for control of the Beiyang Government in Beijing, the clans were fighting for control of Kyoto. Therefore, whichever clan was in control of Kyoto at the time was shown as the Ashikaga Shogunate in the video.
Fyi, Japan wasn't united country at the time.
+KoreanSentry Neither was any of the steppe countries. I couldn't possibly map out every individual daimyo.
Karakuni Nara 류쿠 왕국이 류쿠 열도를 통일하기 전에 오키나와에도 삼국시대가 있었다고 하네요.
Lol the same thing happens to me. I always save my videos in 1080p and after they're uploaded to TH-cam, I can only view them in 720p.
some mistake：
1 Dong ou what appear in 190 BCE in this ，it was established by Yue as their fedual subject in 472 BCE ，after Yue annex Wu，they had too many land ，so Yue‘s king establish the subject manage south land. but Dong ou was survived after Chu annex Yue until Han combine their in 138 BCE.
2 when the Ming rise , he met Chen Youliang ， Zhang Shicheng and another enemy clique，but they haven't appear in the time.
As a Mongol, It looks pretty faultless to my knowledge of history. Except the northern yuan dynasty was basically divided between right wing and left wing. Khalkhas and Southern Mongols (Chahar, khorchin etc..). I'm referring to it because you decided to split four oirats which I think is a good decision.
Do you mean Inner Mongolians?
4:42 is the traditional korean rhythm:)
Can you tell me where you get your information for your research?
I just found your chain , very good content and great video !!
이 영상에서 첫번째로 나온 음악의 제목이 뭐죠?
Some missing pieces...Indo-europan Yuezhi/Tocharians in early history and the Qiang and Tubo(early Tibetan) people who were major players at different periods in history. The areas in modern day Qinghai and Tibet was not a black hole, there were some powerful kingdoms there throughout history.
You're right, but it appears the video creator left out everything west of China on purpose. As you might notice, the Empire of Tibet is never shown, nor is anything else in the western parts of the map. These regions are only included when East Asian powers conquer them.
With the amount of detail he put into making this video, it's evident that this is not a mistake, but rather a choice of preference to only include East Asian history (although whether or not Tibet and the Tarim Basin are/aren't East Asia is debatable).
Why didn't you put Tibet in the map? I think that Tibet is closer to East asia rather than any other region. However nice video!
Usually, the East Asian culture sphere involves the people mentioned in this video. Sure, Tibetans are distantly related to Sinitic, same as Burmese, but they are usually only seen as tangentially part of it
@@NIDELLANEUM yes. But the other hand Tibet is culturally and, most importantly, ethnically/genetically close to Eastern Asia rather than India or Turkic countries. But yeah the cool thing about us is that we made our own and singular culture, independent from others.
Any chance this could be remastered with your modern mapping style?
4:26 lol the music!
"aaaaaaaand China is broken again!"
没办法，社会矛盾积累需要突破口，除非能不断殖民其他地区，不然任何古代帝国都会分裂。
TDH님 메이플 BGM을 자주쓰시네요~ 역사채널로는 님이 갑이신것같아요 ㅎㅎ
어떤게 메이플스토리 브금이에요??
+TV팥빵 이 영상에 나온 브금 전부 다요 ㅋㅋ
good job
Not really
스타일이 많이 달라지셨네여. 년도 넘어가는게 빨라짐
anyone can tell me what songs are in 2:25 and 4:28?
Maplestory molung dojo, maplestory secret floor
Lol shanghai bgm from maplestory? :D
Lmao we all like maplestory.
What’s the last song’s name?
첫번째랑 두번째곡 메이플 무슨 브금이죠? 아무리 생각해도 기억이 안나네ㅠ
I think Nanzhao and Dali in modern-day Yunnan should also be listed as Sinitic.
毕竟被彻底汉化了，人口民族和文字语言都是华夏的
是啊，现在越来越多人认为白语属于汉语支系，而且白语和贵州的蔡龙语一起组成汉语里最先分化出来的白蔡语支（macro-Bai）
6:57 name of the song please
Awesomebob99 (3) MapleStory - Mu Lung Dojo 4
What all music is called?
훌륭하다..!
세심한것까지 표현을했다.!
0:01 I like how the dynasty name have a question mark on it
It's like Troy, some thing really was there, but people are not sure about if it is really called Troy back then, same with Xia, it could have a different name at, because the Shang after it was also called Yin...
@@riza-2396 that's not entirely accurate. Shang was the name of the country, Yin was the name of the people who ruled it. In the case of Xia, the people who ruled the country were called the Xiahous. I'm pretty sure the video owner put the question mark there because there is actually no archaeological evidence that this country even existed.
@@アヤミ No you are totally wrong, Yin is not the name of the people who ruled it, the people are just Shang people. Yin is the capital city of the later half of Shang dynasty, it is famous because Pangeng's decision of moving the capital city to Yin brought prosperity to Shang. Xiahou is also not the ruler of Xia, the ruler has 2 titles, before Qin Shi Huangdi it was Wang, translated to King, after him it was Huangdi or just Huang or Di, translated to emperor.
The rulers of Xia, Shang and Zhou are all Wang, translated to King.
Xiahou is a family name, meaning the Hou of Xia, Hou is a kind of nobel in ancient China.
The Zhou dynasty had 5 levels of nobles: Gong, Hou, Bo, Zi, Nan. This is different depending on different dynasties.
When Zhou defeated Shang, Xia people were settled in Qi(it's qǐ not qí), the ruler of Qǐ changed from Hou to Gong and then to Hou and then to Bo, at the end Qǐ was annexed by Chu, the refugees of Qǐ immigrated to Lu, the Gong of Lu honoured them as Hou of Xia because the ancestors of those people. Which leads to the family name Xiahou.
Also those are actually Shi, not Xing, the Xing are the original family names, but when population grows, split branches of families used Shi as their family names because there are too many people from the same families and it's hard to distinguish smaller branches.
The Xing of ruler of Xia was Si, one of the eight oldest family names, their Shi was Xiahou, but it is not the same "hou" of Xiahou as the later ones from Qǐ, it's 后hòu not 侯hóu during the Xia dynasty.
Xing and Shi only existed differently before Qin Shi Huangdi, after him Xing and Shi are the same meaning, just family names.
그래도 정확하시다
what sources did you use?
I have a correction.
Japanese conquest of Emishi(Northern Fujiwara) is 1189.
제 영상에서 수정하고 싶었던 부분들까지 이 영상에 있는 것을 보고 좋았습니다. 아무래도 님의 영상도, 저의 영상도한반도 부분이 비교적 세밀하게 나오고 그 외 지역은 상세하지 못 한 것이 한계인 듯 합니다 ^^;;궁금한 부분이 있는데 1880년경 조선이 청나라 색깔로 표시되는 것은 어째서 인가요?청나라의 간섭 때문인가요? 결국 청일전쟁이 조선에 벌어질 정도로 두 나라 사이에서 고전했다고는 하지만엄연히 독립된 국가였는데 말이죠.
일단 1882년의 조약에서는 조선이 청의 속국이라고 표기되었고, 문서상에서만 그런 게 아니라 실실적으로도 위안스카이가 조선 정부에 들어오는 등 간섭이 심했기 때문에 1880년대 만이라도 그렇게 표기한 것입니다.
+The Dragon Historian 임오군란 때 파병의 댓가로 맺은 조약의 내용은 상행위와 관련된 내용이었습니다. 속국이라는 표현 하나로 조선이 청나라의 영토가 되는것은 아니죠. 조선은 청나라와의 불평등조약 이후 다른 서양 제국주의 열강들과도 조약들을 맺습니다. 독자적인 외교권이 있었죠. 또한, 청나라는 조선에 대한 간섭으로 우위를 보이려 했지만 일본을 필두로 러시아, 미국, 영국 등 다른나라들이 인정하지 않았습니다. 조선 내 친청파,친러파,친일파 등의 세력 간 힘겨루기가 있었구요. 단지 조청조약의 한 단어로 조선이 청나라 땅인 것으로 하는 것은 잘못되었습니다. 오히려 그 문구는 조공관계를 가지고 조선 종주권으로 확대해석 주장했던 청나라의 바람이었죠. 조선이 청의 속국이 아니었고 다른 나라들도 조선을 청의 속국으로 여기지않았으니까요.
corea359 이 영상에서 조선이 청의 영토로 표기 된 건 아닙니다. 다만 독자적인 외교권이 있었다는 점은 미처 생각하지 못했네요.
@@TheDragonHistorian 만약에 조선이 청의 속국이었다면 국기를 정할때 청의 조언대로 청나라의 국기와 똑같이 정하고 색만 다르게 함으로써 청의 속국이었음을 드러내지 않았을까요? 하지만 고종은 청의 마젠창의 제안을 거절하고 조선만의 독자적인 국기를 정했습니다. 이것만으로도 조선은 독립국가였다는 증거가 될 수 있고요 또 당시에 조선은 관세의 개념조차 없었을정도로 국제사회의 인식이 희박했습니다. 서구열강과의 조약중 하나에서 청나라가 원하는대로 속국표시를 했다고 속국으로 취급되는것은 이상하다고 생각합니다. 그리고 민비정권의 가장 큰 뒷배가 청나라였고 임오군란에서도 국왕이 위기를 느끼고 청나라에 도움을 요청한 것이지 그걸로 속국이라고 취급할 수 없다고 생각합니다.
@@msmmoa8935 청나라의 의도를 보면 알 수 있죠. 당시 19세기 청나라는 서구 국가들한테 뒤져라 처맞던 상태여서 자신들의 영토를 뺏기지 않기 위해 전까지는 그냥 자기들 영토에서 살게 냅뒀던 위구르지역도 신장이라는 이름을 대며 속국화 시켰습니다. 조선도 이와 다를바 없어요.
"Proto-Ainu" is an odd way of referring to the peoples of the Japanese archipelago in the ancient past. The more widely accepted term across disciplines is simply "Jomon peoples"
Agreed. Especially seeing as the Ainu people have roots in various peoples around the Sea of Okhotsk, not only the Jomon.
You're right, but the distinction is still valid.
While all pre-Yayoi inhabitants of the Japanese islands are considered Jomon people, genetic and historical evidence has revealed that the Jomon were not a heterogenous group. Despite sharing many cultural similarities, Jomon people from northern Japan and Jomon people from southern Japan also had plenty of differences.
Jomon remains from Ryukyu and Kyushu are genetically very different from Jomon remains from Hokkaido and Tohoku. The southern Jomon were more closely related to early continental East Asians and Taiwanese aboriginals, and the northern Jomon were more closely related to coastal Paleolithic Siberian groups. And what we know of their cultures from archeological, oral, and written historical evidence backs that up: While southern Jomon society was semi-agricultural and in part matriarchal with female chieftains and priestess cults, the northern Jomon were primarily hunter-gatherers who were less matriarchal, more tribal, and practiced a more nature-heavy form of animism.
So yeah, it's good to separate the two Jomon cultures, but I also agree that calling them "Jomon" and "Proto-Ainu" is not the best choice of names. "Northern Jomon" and "Southern Jomon" would work just fine.
How to know about king of buyeo in period Qin Dynasty because I only see that king of buyeo in period han dynasty :V
What is the name of the song/music?
th-cam.com/video/xPtgIjPQqe4/w-d-xo.html
A BGM from maplestory :D
You forgot to include the Tibetan Empire. It was a huge player during Tang Dynasty.
Tang dynasty: *proceeds to almost have it's size*
No, Tibet not a part of video like India and other regions, until mongolian khoshuts conquered tibet in 17 century tibet dont participate
Amazing from China, Japan, Korea (North And South), Mongolia, Russian Far East, Tibet, Taiwan, Manchuria, Perhaps parts of Vietnam and maybe a few others have very fascinating articles of recordings
China (China proper, Manchuria, Tibet, Taiwan)
@@rete5132 Taiwan is not China.
Taiwan was originally an independent country and was inhabited by indigenous people.
After the Dutch colonization began and the Japanese Zheng Chenggong drove out the Dutch, Han Chinese from the mainland began to migrate.
After that, Jurchen ruled Taiwan, but the Japanese Empire destroyed the Qing dynasty and Taiwan was annexed by Japan.
@山田次郎：琉球独立
@@user-hn4qr8ty6f Taiwan refers to itself as the republic of China. I think it should be considered "China".
@@yidminselaks Taiwan was taken over by the Kuomintang government of the Republic of China.
Currently, most Taiwanese speak Chinese due to the Han Chinese assimilation policy, but ethnically speaking, more than 80% are non-Han Chinese.
Whats the first song called?
from about 500 C.E. mogher trybes (sumo-mogher) vassals of Koguryo in north = like ong-gur, maghiar - hungar? (sumo = saami?) from Ural mountain?
Few Noticeable Errors:
Han dynasty’s western territories location seems off, you showed the territory in the middle of taklamakan desert, it should be more north than that.
Tang dynasty had more western territories, because they had fought wars in Persia.
Dzungaria had Aksai-Chin region, because that’s the only way they can take to control Tibet (Dzungaria and Tibet was separated by Kunlun mountain, the eastern end of Kunlun was controlled by Qing dynasty which is the enemy of Dzungaria. The only way the can have control on Tibet is through Aksai-Chin)
You skipped year 263.
What is the BGM of this video?
What is the music name?
this is exactlywhat I learned from my school in korea. other korean people who are complaining must have skipped class
@@dou_june0v037 Are you saying that Koreans learn the history of the Tang Dynasty instead of the history of Korea?
@@dou_june0v037 I am Korean but I have never learned the history of Tang Dynasty.
@@dou_june0v037 But When Korean go to high school, Korean learn East Asian history and world history.
@@dou_june0v037 Koreans learn about Korean history at school😊
Northern Laos and Central Laos were Vietnamese territories since 1479
one inacurracy, the chinese dynasties had control over yunnan starting from han
Great video, but the music doesn't fit at all.
great !! Love from Korea
Korea was splitted on Northern and Southern even in ancient times lol.
It was not, at least not with the same borders or in a cultural sesne.
do you mean 850ce? balhae and sinra?
Alex _ stop using fact!
Alex _ and they grew rich and north Korea? Chinese and north korea russians are all poor...
Probably an oxymoron
근데 역사룡님 백두산정계비가 세워진 19세기경부터 간도 조약이 맺어진 1909년 까지 간도가 조선2단계가 되거나 청-조 공동통치지역으로 분류되야도지않나요?
그리고 조선 왕국이 세워진건 기원전 8세기경 아닌가요?
@@user-wz4hy6lw6q 청동기 문화가 기원전 8세기 발견되는 건 맞지만 고조선이 그 때부터 존속해있었다는 건 근거가 없습니다
anyone knows the name of the song in the minute 3:30 ? please
th-cam.com/video/rTaKDq59E_s/w-d-xo.html
there you go
Hello?
Mu lung forest.
I'm Korean and this video is very good. I dont understand why some people deny this.
muchim golbaengi ancient Tibet empire also belongs to east asia
I'm from Sakha Republic (North-Eastern Siberia). We originated from Baikal territory but migrated to the north, theoretically in the past we were the small part of Xiongnu confederation. We have turkic, mongolic and tungusic in our bloods. Historically our enemies were Chinese, but I wish one time we will make a big union of East Asian people.
Respect to our East Asian blood brothers, expecially for Korea because I like your country very much and I've been there for many times.
Remember, we have the real chance to control the whole World. China, Korea, Japan, Mongolia, Manchuria and others, we will rule this world.
Thank you my brothers.
We will never forget our Yakut and siberian brothers in the north.
Maybe someday you guys have your own country and will be known as nordic countries in Asia far east because of your geography, culture, and looks of the people. You guys in siberia are the palest asians.
koreans are from baikal as well. We always had many proverbs about the lake and it's funny that the scientist tests a genetic squence found in a cave near Baikal. and the gene was closest to korean people. I am serious. I think Koreans were the true genes or people of baikal immigrated 7000 years ago. and still have the gene unlike other mongolic people. mongolians are now diverse. They share chinese white middle eastern blood.
中国不是你们的敌人 你们是南方农业社会的威胁 你们吃不饱饭的时候就得侵略中国。。。中国从来不会去你们那兔子不拉屎的地方主动侵略。。
pozk 16661 there are no such a enemy at all since it is a more than 2000 years journey with couples of Dynasties have been destroyed,the main blood of Huns,tungusic and mongols(even the golden blood of khan) are all mixed with Chinese Han people. The ancestor you mentioned are basically Chinese now, and you can not even tell from they looks . It’s like in the Roma age, Greek and Latin Roman people are enemy,but after hundreds years, the main people of Roma(Byzantine) are Greek people.
Please do one for Europe and the Middle East.
이 프로그램 이름이 뭐예요?? 한번 해보고 싶게 생김 ㅎㅎ
지도는 Photoshop Elements 8.0으로 그렸고 영상은 Premiere Pro CC로 제작했습니다.
Why you didn’t show Yenisei Kyrgyz KHAGANATE?
잘 만들었군요..
아시아 역사... 한중일... 흥망성쇠를...전체적으로 볼 수 있어서...
几千年历史里整体上中国就是东亚的核心，也是东亚文明起始之地，毕竟筷子文化圈😂。
东亚其余国家都是地缘上的边缘国家，领土人口差距太大了。二战时期，日本侵略中国的时候，幻想中的大东亚国家，是想学满族一样统治中国（虽然现在满族已经被汉化了，文化灭族了）。日本也曾想把首都迁到北京，宣传整个东亚这个高度同质化的文明区域，所以并没有破坏北京皇城。
中国东部地区是亚欧大陆东部最肥沃的土地，只要中国不分裂（中国93%的人口是汉族，现代民族主义国家建构下很难分裂了，毕竟中国也不是弱国），不论哪个政府统治中国，中国都会是亚洲核心和主导者。毕竟体量差距太大了
Dai Viet opened its territory deep south into the DNA country
The music at 5:35 is fuckin awesome
I feel many kingdom you showed is not right. Like Yuan and Qing. It is not Sinitic. It is Han Chinese being invaded. Your map feels like it is governed by two ethnicities together which might make people feel Han Chinese are always invaded others.
Jialun Yang Yes. Yuan is created and ruled by Mongols and Qing is created and ruled by Manchus. But he did it because the rulers have went cery deep into chinese culture
6:18 Azuchi-momoyama
Balhae is good because it is correctly written as Korean history
It took so long for Japan to finish its own islands. Were barbarian native tribes there that strong?
great job
Altaic Peoples in History of East Asia - Korea, Turkic, Mongolic, Tungusic, Japonic in Altai Family
LOL，nobody want to become the 'relative' of stupid turkey
Sporting Nature yeah japonic is mixed Austronesian and Northeast asian/Korean.
fk sad turkic trying to made japan and korea are they sibling lel cause they are shameful of they own turkic origin which who get invade by the real turk then fuck they woman then made the men watch and belive that the one fucking they wife are they brother ( which is not cause the turk are outsider who come to invade the now day turk land who the native are not turk lol )
Japanese is also categorized as an isolated group like Korea...Austronesian theory is just a theory
@@batukaganbat6093 they are no relaitve nation sbut they are share COMMON Origin in Sibira .
Black Poeples:
Banthu Peoples: South african , Tanzanian , Mozambiq, Madagascar and Kenyan
Aborgines ( Black-White mix) :
Niger-Congo (West) Peoples: Nigeria, Gabon,Congo,Senegal
Eastern Aborgines : Dravidians( souh hinduistan ),Thamils,Sinotics(today chinese)Thai,Vietnamse,Malays,Australians and ınca peoples
Early Farmers ( Mosttl white butt have black people features) :
Semitic (West) Peoples : Eagptians, Magreps, Arabs and oher Malta,Sudan,Mouritania peoples
Hamitic (East) Peoples : Some anatolian and middle east nations, Armenians and some caucasians, Mezopotamian, Judens .
White Peoples:
Indo Peoples (West) : Indians, Persians,Hellanic,Celts
Siberian Peoples ( East) : Americans native,Peleo sibirians,Tıbet-Jomons,Yenısey(Zhao,Wei),Koreans,Tungus,Altaic,Ural peoples .
5:17 Genghis has joined the game
Then seconds later he left the game.
@@yanyu3121 He was too powerful and had to get nerfed
Fun fact：Gojoseon was founded by a Chinese named 卫满, which is recorded in two ancient Chinese history books
No 😂 weiman was a Yan dynasty remnant. After the han dynasty conquered the Yan dynasty, weiman fled to gojoseon where he showed the king there how to use iron, and became a general. He then overthrew the king of gojoseon and ruled it for himself.
What are you talking about? According to 史記 and 魏略, Wiman came from Yan dynasty who became a ruler of Gojoseon by wearing 'Gojoseon clothes'('胡服', '蠻夷' in real document tho). In other words, Gojoseon existed before Wiman, and he surrendered the Gojoseon 'King Jun(準王)' and became king.
What you said is a big logical leap and not a fun fact. If you are Chinese, find and read objective books and face the truth.
it is because Gojoseon fought long time with Han.
Someone make a crab rave meme out of this song
it's like europa universalis 4
I've just noticed Kara Del is positioned in the wrong place
거의 팩트만 써서 만들었구만, 중국인이 만들었으면 Koreanic 부분에 고구려가 있 수가 없다, 환빠는 쉿!
Nemo Kim 걍 팩트임 원나라시대도 짧지만 잘 표기했고
근데 저기서 요동이 진나라 영토로 표기되어 있는데 진시황이 요동에 비석을 세우라고 세운게 오늘 중국의 난하강이라고 요하강보다 더 서쪽에 있는 지역이래요 그렇기 때문에 진나라가 요동 땅을 차지했다는 근거는 없어요
Bgm을 들어보셈... 메이플스토리임...
진짜 환빠들 ㅅㅂㅋㅋㅋㅋ
환빠가 뭐에용??
Pretty well done! Respect! It gives quite a good chronology. Some errors: 1) Naimans, Tatars, Khereids, Khamag Mongols/Borjigin were all Mongolic tribes, not actually Turkic. They all spoke the same language and Tatars on the Mongolian Steppes have not much to do with Tatarstan today or Tatars in Crime or Siberian Tatars. Just the name Tatar was bestowed to the Turkic tribes later. The name Tatar is the most wrongly used name in the history. Sometimes mixing with the word Tartaria. 2) Dinling was not Turkic, according to the recent research findings. They were Scythian/Indo-European with Tagar Culture, like Sogdians. But nowadays everyone claims all the old tribes as theirs. Pity for the historical science. Dinling was simply assimilated into neighboring the Turkic tribes and Mongolic Xianbei.
What's the name of the first song?
MapleStory - Go Shanghai
The Dragon Historian Thx
I learned that Korea has been around much longer than Japan.
Yamato people came from the peninsula after all, modern Japanese are a mixture between Jomon people and Yamato
Of course, it became civilized from the area close to China.
Korean history dates back to Goryeo.
The indigenous people of the Korean Peninsula and the Japanese archipelago were the Jomon people, and the Yayoi people who came from southern China and the Jomon people mixed little by little, and the Yamato people were born.
The Yamato people (Wajin) of Kyushu lived in the southern part of the Korean peninsula, and the Han people lived in the northern part of the Korean peninsula.
However, as the Tungusic tribe called Buyeo invaded the Liaodong Peninsula, the Han people fled to the south and interbred with the Wa people, giving birth to the Korean people.
In terms of genetics, Han + Japanese + Tungus = modern Korean DNA.
People who fled to Japan after the collapse of Baekje and Goguryeo had the genes of the Han O2 lineage.
@@user-hn4qr8ty6f yeah the genetic/historic relationship between Korea and japan is similar to that of Turkey and Greece and I feel like there’s a huge misconception about the two peoples having a common origin. The first people to inhabit the Korean Peninsula were japonic speaking peoples with a similar genetic makeup to modern Japanese people until the proto koreanic speakers arrived from the steppe assimilating with them creating the modern Korean ethnicity. Modern Koreans = Tungus/mongol/Siberian tribes + yayoi agriculturalist. Modern Japanese = Yayoi agriculturalist + Jomon + austronesian tribes. The genetics of both nations cluster greatly from sharing the same agricultural yayoi component due to assimilation but have separate ethno linguistic origins
이게 레전드지
Oh Maplestory Music. Oh memories.
Music in 4:31?
Maplestory-secret floor
perfect video from Turkey
명; 이렇게 치면 고려말 조선초까지 두만강 유역을 우리색으로 칠해야 하는거 아닌가요?
Why are the years decreasing
Nice. But why have you skipped Tibetan and Burmese states?
I consider Tibet and Burma to be parts of South Asia and Southeast Asia, respectively.
Yamato seems chilling there
Wouldn't the Proto-Mongols have been further east, somewhere around northeastern China and far eastern Russia? The lands of present-day Mongolia were the center of several major Turkic confederations before the Mongolic-speaking peoples arrived on the scene, so it makes sense that the Proto-Turkic peoples were there and the Proto-Mongolic peoples were to their east. I've always been partial to the idea that the Xiongnu were Proto-Turkic and the Xianbei were proto-Mongolic.
Hunnu(Xiongnu) is mongolian
@@Orgil. That's inconclusive. The prevailing theory is that the Xiongnu (Huns) were proto-Turkic, just like the groups that immediately followed them like the Gokturks and the Old Uyghurs. The Xianbei, located further to the east, were proto-Mongolic and moved in to fill the avoid after the proto-Turkic peoples moved out into Central Asia and Siberia.
@@hexkobold9814 rouran is mongolian
@@Orgil. Xiongnu were Turkic just like Tiele lol
@@Orgil. Xianbei and Rouran are Para-Mongolic not Turkic or Mongolic
그래도 저번 동아시아 역사 영상에 비해
영토표기도 거의 실수가 없네요
이런 영상 만드는 어플같은거 좀 알려주세요
what are the music names?
th-cam.com/video/C0xN8QcxqXk/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/nVYJrx19fPo/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/rTaKDq59E_s/w-d-xo.html