docs.google.com/document/d/1iCwWG60jRTwKtSaoVaWQKqsVfkLqKEvx2GD8_KItfrU/edit?usp=sharing Here is the timeline document I wrote for this video, maybe it can help with your History of the World 2.0 video too. Although keep in mind that some of the details are missing, so for those you should probably watch the video at half speed or slower so you don't miss anything
OMG U COMMENT THIS THIS IS WAY BETTER THAN TIGERSTAR'S VERSION OF EAST ASIA IM HAPPY THAT THE DRAGON HISTORIAN IS DOING MY COUNTRYS STORY DETAILY (china) and im not from that stooped mainland im from hk
As a Mongol, It looks pretty faultless to my knowledge of history. Except the northern yuan dynasty was basically divided between right wing and left wing. Khalkhas and Southern Mongols (Chahar, khorchin etc..). I'm referring to it because you decided to split four oirats which I think is a good decision.
최근 한국사 공부하다가 눈에 띄길래 들어와봤습니다. 조회수 4만밖에 안되는데 이렇게나 난장판이라니 동아시아의 예민한 정치상황을 반영하는 것 같아서 안타깝기도 하네요. 한국사만 해도 머리아픈데 중국 고대의 그 많은 국가들, 그리고 베트남을 포함한 중국 외 국가들까지 세세히 반영하시다니 대단하십니다. 업로더분과 댓글에서 언급하신 Ollie Bye 님의 영상 즐겨찾기 해놓고 간간이 봐야겠습니다ㅎ 수고하세요~
Well done. Very well done. I am not a professional historian, but I feel you made this from a very fair and objective perspective. I read some complaints and criticitical comments on the way you did. But, please don't be swayed by those nationalists and manipulators from different countries. Just give facts, only facts. A Big hug from abroad for Koreans and people in other Asian countries who are constantly bullied by certain big country!!!
Pretty well done! Respect! It gives quite a good chronology. Some errors: 1) Naimans, Tatars, Khereids, Khamag Mongols/Borjigin were all Mongolic tribes, not actually Turkic. They all spoke the same language and Tatars on the Mongolian Steppes have not much to do with Tatarstan today or Tatars in Crime or Siberian Tatars. Just the name Tatar was bestowed to the Turkic tribes later. The name Tatar is the most wrongly used name in the history. Sometimes mixing with the word Tartaria. 2) Dinling was not Turkic, according to the recent research findings. They were Scythian/Indo-European with Tagar Culture, like Sogdians. But nowadays everyone claims all the old tribes as theirs. Pity for the historical science. Dinling was simply assimilated into neighboring the Turkic tribes and Mongolic Xianbei.
Amazing from China, Japan, Korea (North And South), Mongolia, Russian Far East, Tibet, Taiwan, Manchuria, Perhaps parts of Vietnam and maybe a few others have very fascinating articles of recordings
@@rete5132 Taiwan is not China. Taiwan was originally an independent country and was inhabited by indigenous people. After the Dutch colonization began and the Japanese Zheng Chenggong drove out the Dutch, Han Chinese from the mainland began to migrate. After that, Jurchen ruled Taiwan, but the Japanese Empire destroyed the Qing dynasty and Taiwan was annexed by Japan.
@@yidminselaks Taiwan was taken over by the Kuomintang government of the Republic of China. Currently, most Taiwanese speak Chinese due to the Han Chinese assimilation policy, but ethnically speaking, more than 80% are non-Han Chinese.
I'm from Sakha Republic (North-Eastern Siberia). We originated from Baikal territory but migrated to the north, theoretically in the past we were the small part of Xiongnu confederation. We have turkic, mongolic and tungusic in our bloods. Historically our enemies were Chinese, but I wish one time we will make a big union of East Asian people. Respect to our East Asian blood brothers, expecially for Korea because I like your country very much and I've been there for many times. Remember, we have the real chance to control the whole World. China, Korea, Japan, Mongolia, Manchuria and others, we will rule this world.
Maybe someday you guys have your own country and will be known as nordic countries in Asia far east because of your geography, culture, and looks of the people. You guys in siberia are the palest asians.
koreans are from baikal as well. We always had many proverbs about the lake and it's funny that the scientist tests a genetic squence found in a cave near Baikal. and the gene was closest to korean people. I am serious. I think Koreans were the true genes or people of baikal immigrated 7000 years ago. and still have the gene unlike other mongolic people. mongolians are now diverse. They share chinese white middle eastern blood.
pozk 16661 there are no such a enemy at all since it is a more than 2000 years journey with couples of Dynasties have been destroyed,the main blood of Huns,tungusic and mongols(even the golden blood of khan) are all mixed with Chinese Han people. The ancestor you mentioned are basically Chinese now, and you can not even tell from they looks . It’s like in the Roma age, Greek and Latin Roman people are enemy,but after hundreds years, the main people of Roma(Byzantine) are Greek people.
No 😂 weiman was a Yan dynasty remnant. After the han dynasty conquered the Yan dynasty, weiman fled to gojoseon where he showed the king there how to use iron, and became a general. He then overthrew the king of gojoseon and ruled it for himself.
What are you talking about? According to 史記 and 魏略, Wiman came from Yan dynasty who became a ruler of Gojoseon by wearing 'Gojoseon clothes'('胡服', '蠻夷' in real document tho). In other words, Gojoseon existed before Wiman, and he surrendered the Gojoseon 'King Jun(準王)' and became king. What you said is a big logical leap and not a fun fact. If you are Chinese, find and read objective books and face the truth.
Absolutely Amazing work as always! However, one nitpick, you forgot the three kingdoms of 14th century Okinawa; Chuzan Hokuzan, and Nanzan, which split the island until 1429, when the Ryukyu kingdom comes in, but other than that, I see no problems. One question though, I noticed that during the Sengoku, you showed many of the Japanese clans and the Ikko-Ikki as seperate entities from the Ashikaga government, were these actually independent states? I always assumed they were all subservient to the central government, but warring among st themselves.
Thanks for telling me about the three kingdoms of Okinawa! I really had no idea. As for the Sengoku Period, I like to think it as similar to the Warlord Era in China. Just like many of the warlord cliques were fighting for control of the Beiyang Government in Beijing, the clans were fighting for control of Kyoto. Therefore, whichever clan was in control of Kyoto at the time was shown as the Ashikaga Shogunate in the video.
All those people fighting with broken English in the comments- The Chinese thinking they were the only conscious species in the world, The Koreans believing their ancient empires were galactic, and extra...
Awesome! I can see the overloaded amount of effort put into this video and mostly accurate. Just a little flaw that I found. ( 4:08 ) I believe that Anxi Protectorate of Tang was taken over by the Tibetan Empire (吐蕃) instead of the Uyghurs. Gansu area was only to be able to be back into Tang's hand due to internal turmoil of Tibet later on and the Uyghurs gained respective Independences soon after. Example Reference: /watch?v=-foZ5RcCm8U (13:06 - 13:58) What do you think?
Hi! I'm glad that you enjoyed the video. At 4:08, I showed that the Anxi Protectorate got destroyed by a nation not inside the scope of this map - i.e. the Tibetan Empire. However, I did show Gansu being taken over by the Uyghur Khanate. Is that what you were pointing out?
Oh, OK my bad it looked like Uyghurs took over the area from the Gansu pathway so I thought they were the ones that later took over Tarim Basin. It makes sense now.
It is interesting to see how Japan is so peacefull untill 16th century, but the mainland countries like China and Korea are fighting with themselves even in BC era
Because China has detailed historical materials to record these wars, but Japan does not, people today mainly rely on historical materials to understand the past.
Sorry for the really really long wait. But it's finally here! I hope you guys enjoy :) I also apologize that the video looks somewhat out of focus (that's the best way I can describe it). I had to cut down the quality a little bit while rendering the video in Premiere Pro and then TH-cam butchered it. Even the colors were modified slightly, for example Russia is supposed to be a much darker shade of green, etc. Anyway, I hope that doesn't get in your way of watching the video. EDIT: It seems like the colors are back to normal now, I guess it just took TH-cam really long to process the whole thing. The out-of-focusy feel is still there though. Thank you guys for watching regardless! EDIT: I just noticed a mistake that I made, Mongolia after 1992 should be just "Mongolia," not the Mongolian People's Republic.
"Proto-Ainu" is an odd way of referring to the peoples of the Japanese archipelago in the ancient past. The more widely accepted term across disciplines is simply "Jomon peoples"
You're right, but the distinction is still valid. While all pre-Yayoi inhabitants of the Japanese islands are considered Jomon people, genetic and historical evidence has revealed that the Jomon were not a heterogenous group. Despite sharing many cultural similarities, Jomon people from northern Japan and Jomon people from southern Japan also had plenty of differences. Jomon remains from Ryukyu and Kyushu are genetically very different from Jomon remains from Hokkaido and Tohoku. The southern Jomon were more closely related to early continental East Asians and Taiwanese aboriginals, and the northern Jomon were more closely related to coastal Paleolithic Siberian groups. And what we know of their cultures from archeological, oral, and written historical evidence backs that up: While southern Jomon society was semi-agricultural and in part matriarchal with female chieftains and priestess cults, the northern Jomon were primarily hunter-gatherers who were less matriarchal, more tribal, and practiced a more nature-heavy form of animism. So yeah, it's good to separate the two Jomon cultures, but I also agree that calling them "Jomon" and "Proto-Ainu" is not the best choice of names. "Northern Jomon" and "Southern Jomon" would work just fine.
Why can't we ignore our petty differences and notice our many similarities? We are a people of long history and rich culture. We are among the most diligent and intelligent people in the world. And yet, East Asia remains divided while America has US (50 states) and Europe has European Union (28 states) Why do we Asians have to be considered inferior to US and EU? Some of the most developed cities in the world are in East Asia and we manufacture cutting edge technology like semiconductor wafers, electronic gadgets, automotives and computer software here in Asia. We definitely could rule the world if we want to and only if we work together. Why can't we form an alliance that serves the interest of East Asians? Even South East Asia has ASEAN which looks after the interest of SE Asian countries. Surely we too, can do the same if we put our differences aside.
+Daniel Liu, I agree that our histories run deeper than other nations, possibly because of longer histories and long memories. But that does not mean we can take steps in the right direction. As Chinese, China's biggest trade partners after the USA, are Japan, South Korea and Taiwan. (Source: Wikipedia / List of the largest trading partners of China). Not mentioned is also Hong Kong, which China also trades regularly with. If we can continue trade with these countries, despite our rivalries with them, then it is already possible that we can work together despite our differences.
+Daniel Liu Oh then it is tricky indeed. As mainland Chinese, what I do know is that our government has proposed the "One Country, Two Systems" to Taiwan too. Hopefully our governments can resolve this issue peacefully. We still have trade going on between us, so conflict is only going to affect our economies.
there's no such thing as rivalry between Korean and China. Korea is a perpetual slave state sucking masters for protection, while China is a superpower. Putting Korea and China in the same sentence is like putting Panama along the US.
Viet/Yue original people were the Melanesian + Austronesian. Basically, the original people that inhabited in the Northern province of Vietnam, such as the Hoabinhian and Dong Son people, weren't anything like modern day Vietnamese. They looked like the Semang from Malaysia (From the Hoabinh era) and Makassan ethnic from Sulawesi, Indonesia (from the Dong Son culture) before the Chinese migrated to the region. Majority of today's modern Vietnameses don't look like these people due to many waves of Chinese migrations, especially people from the lower Yangtze river. Source: 1) www.drnguyenviet.com/?id=5&cat=1&cid=22 2) books.google.com/books?id=5eEASHGLg3MC&pg=PA286&lpg=PA286&dq=the+cambridge+encyclopedia+of+hunters+and+gatherers+Hoabinhians&source=bl&ots=E0qt-KIbgj&sig=GFkhUiwshvVFJNpltwKjWw6uVx0&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj2v--h6-jNAhXGSiYKHS3zCZcQ6AEIKzAD#v=onepage&q=the%20cambridge%20encyclopedia%20of%20hunters%20and%20gatherers%20Hoabinhians&f=false Learn the truth, would you?
According to the official history of Vietnam-《大越史記全書》Đại Việt sử ký、《欽定越史通鑑綱目》Khâm Định Việt Sử Thông Giám Cương Mục、《越史略》Đại Việt sử lược 、《嶺南摭怪•鴻龐氏傳》 Lĩnh Nam chích quái 自鴻龐氏hung Pang，曰涇陽王Kinh Duong Vuong，系出神農Shengnong ，首肇封疆VIET 2879 BC to 258 BC legend of the era of hung Pang Dynasty 神農Shengnong -帝明+婺仙女-祿續+洞庭君神龍女-崇纜Lạc Long Quân +嫗姬 Shennong 神農氏grew in Jiangshui姜水, Baoji County of Shaanxi Province中國陝西, and established Chen as the capital In 2879BC, Loc Tuc祿續, a chinese man born in Hunan province of China湖南省, he was also as known as Kinh Duong Vuong 崇纜's father is祿續，祿續's father is帝明，帝明's grandfather is神農 神農氏 Shennong -Chinese 帝明--Chinese 祿續--Chinese 崇纜--Lạc Long Quân 257 BC - 207 BC Thục dynasty瓯雒国 An Duong Vuong安阳王蜀泮, a chinese from state of Shu蜀国（Sichuan, China）founded the kingdom of Âu Lac in the area of present-day northern Vietnam. Shupan annexed Van Lang After assembling an army, he defeated King Hùng Vương XVIII, the last ruler of the Hồng Bàng dynasty, around 257 BC. He proclaimed himself An Dương Vương ("King An Dương"). He then renamed Văn Lang as Âu Lạc …………………………………………………………………………… 207-111 BC Nanyue南越國 赵佗 was a general of Qin--chinese ，Around 180 to 179 BC, Âu Lạc was annexed by Nanyue南越國 When 秦世皇 unified China in 221 BC, one of his biggest project was to conquest/pacify rest of what we know as Linnan嶺南, and migrate large number of Chinese to this land. Qin Shi Huang send 500,000 Qin soldiers and several millions of migrants, traders, families to Lingnan（Nanyue） includes Âu Lac（Northern Vietnam） When Qin collapsed, the de facto general governor of that part of China, Zhao Tuo, deliberately cut off it from rest of China to avoid the chaos of warfare, in effect established itself as an independent kingdom, NanYue, which was the name of the province which he was a deputy governor of sort. Once Han Dynasty was on solid footing, Han Chinese immediately turned attention to this once a province of China, and eventually, incorporate this into Han proper. The process, including armed conflict, trade embargos, and other form of negotiation, took over 100 years. From all indication, Zhao Tuo himself want to eventually reunite with rest of China proper, but waiting for opportune time (political climate in China, i.e. decent rulers in Han’s court). Han Dynasty allow Zhao Tuo keep this “emperor” title in NanYue for rest of his life So, during that intern 100 years, NanYue WAS a vassal State of Han. as it is, by all account, a separate Chinese kingdom, founded by Chinese general (who was born in a city 200 miles from Beijing, 1300 miles from Northern Vietnam), with large percentage of subjects migrated from other part of China. NanYue is, culturally and historically, Chinese. .............................................................................................................. 111 BC-938 After the 2nd century BC，The Chinese ruled northern Vietnam for more than 1,000 years 漢朝、東吳、晋朝、南朝、隋朝、唐朝和南漢
Sorry but Vietnamese don't speak Chinese, our language is too different to the Chinese language so im pretty sure that there is a significant native population (or early comers from ancient China) that were not Melanesian nor Austronesian and was still very different from the modern Chinese. So in the end we Vietnamese have our native (or early comers) blood.
+Vinh Bảo Vietnamese =Admixture of Han chinese + Khmer，not Yue people Your Vietnamese language has changed Baiyue=Yue+Wu+Minyue+Dongou+Nanyue+Au Lac Zhuang people are Au Lac people Xi-Ou were proto-Tai Kadai O1a. If Vietnamese were Luo Yue's descandants. Thier language must one of Tai branch. Because all of Luo Yue mixed with Xi-Ou (proto Tai-Kadai)，But today Vietnamese language belong to Mon-Khmer language. It contrast with Vietnamese's claim.（Mon-Khmer language-Mon Khmer Vietnamese） Ancient Champa was an Austronesian kingdom，not austroasiatic（Mon-Khmer） Minyue and Dongou Taiwanese aborigines（austronesian） high frequencies O1a-M119-89.6%，ancient Taiwan aborigines were related to the ancient Minyue Gou-Wu and Yu-Yue A 2007 analysis of the DNA recovered from human remains in archeological sites of prehistoric peoples along the Yangtze River in China also shows high frequencies of Haplogroup O1 in the Neolithic Liangzhu culture（Gou-Wu and Yu-Yue） The ancient Yue people created the Hemudu culture (河姆渡文化, 7800-7100 bp) and the Liangzhu culture 良渚文化(5300-4200 bp) proto Tai-Kadai austronesian Baiyue They belong to the same Group BUT,Vietnam O1a-M119 only 6% So your Vietnamese ancestors are not yue people
Wouldn't the Proto-Mongols have been further east, somewhere around northeastern China and far eastern Russia? The lands of present-day Mongolia were the center of several major Turkic confederations before the Mongolic-speaking peoples arrived on the scene, so it makes sense that the Proto-Turkic peoples were there and the Proto-Mongolic peoples were to their east. I've always been partial to the idea that the Xiongnu were Proto-Turkic and the Xianbei were proto-Mongolic.
@@Orgil. That's inconclusive. The prevailing theory is that the Xiongnu (Huns) were proto-Turkic, just like the groups that immediately followed them like the Gokturks and the Old Uyghurs. The Xianbei, located further to the east, were proto-Mongolic and moved in to fill the avoid after the proto-Turkic peoples moved out into Central Asia and Siberia.
As you can see, Yue people is Chinese. They got rule by Nam Việt. Its mean Yue people in Nam Việt territory is half Vietnamese. Chinese people always said Vietnamese is old chinese people from Yue.
My friend, "Nam Việt" in Cantonese is same as "NamYue", the meaning is "South Yue(粤or越) people". The key point is whom and why the people make name and pronunciation of "Nam"(South). If Vietnamese really ruled this area, why they didn't make the name and sound as it's own? "Nam" in Chinese writing system and pronunciation direct to "South". The name is the real history.
@@sonicwu3428 in 1802 nguyễn dynasty ask qing dynasty to change đại việt( vn name at that time ) to nam việt which mean việt people live in the south of north (china ) dynasty but qing emperor don't agree because if vn reclaim the name nam việt it will include guangxi and quangdong province , so nguyễn dynasty change the name to việt nam and qing emperor agree with this name
Turkic has always been a predominantly spoken language, used at the courts of the local rulers, in the army, by rural or nomadic populations, and as a lingua franca among the multiethnic tribal confederations. It was even the language of communication in the Mongol army. Turkic has also been a supra-regional language of communication among smaller communities of speakers of minority languages and a means of communication among people of different ethnic backgrounds in certain social and professional groups, e.g. the Bāzārī class in Teheran.
The historical Mongols were a federation of heterogenous groups of different nomad peoples of "Tartar" and also Türkish origin. The word "Mongol" is derived from the name of a tribe called Mongɣol or Manqol. Even if the cultural levels of these ethnic groups were different, they had a common language and a common culture which made their unification under the hand of a strong leader easier. In 1206, Temüjin (1155 or 1167-1227) of the Borjigid line of the Mongɣol adopted the title of Great Khan (qaɣan, in Chinese kèhán! 可汗). He is known as Činggis Qaɣan (Genghis Khan). Under his leadership the Mongols destroyed the Western Xia 西夏 (1038-1227) and Jin 金 (1115-1234) empires and conquered central Asia. The successors of Činggis Qaɣan created the largest empire that ever existed in premodern history. Yet this empire soon disintegrated into several states (ulus), one of which was China, ruled by the Yuan dynasty 元 (1279-1368) that was founded by Qubilai Qaɣan (Emperor Shizu 元世祖, r. 1260-1294), a grandson of Činggis.
I believe China, Korea and Japan should make an East Asian Ally like European Union or ASEAN and stop fighting each other. We are the far most richest and strongest nations among the whole Oriental Asia, and no matter it is, we should stop argue and fighting each other for their only own benefits. If we unite, we could be the most faithful and strongest friends in the world.
Korean history dates back to Goryeo. The indigenous people of the Korean Peninsula and the Japanese archipelago were the Jomon people, and the Yayoi people who came from southern China and the Jomon people mixed little by little, and the Yamato people were born. The Yamato people (Wajin) of Kyushu lived in the southern part of the Korean peninsula, and the Han people lived in the northern part of the Korean peninsula. However, as the Tungusic tribe called Buyeo invaded the Liaodong Peninsula, the Han people fled to the south and interbred with the Wa people, giving birth to the Korean people. In terms of genetics, Han + Japanese + Tungus = modern Korean DNA. People who fled to Japan after the collapse of Baekje and Goguryeo had the genes of the Han O2 lineage.
@@山田次郎-e8i yeah the genetic/historic relationship between Korea and japan is similar to that of Turkey and Greece and I feel like there’s a huge misconception about the two peoples having a common origin. The first people to inhabit the Korean Peninsula were japonic speaking peoples with a similar genetic makeup to modern Japanese people until the proto koreanic speakers arrived from the steppe assimilating with them creating the modern Korean ethnicity. Modern Koreans = Tungus/mongol/Siberian tribes + yayoi agriculturalist. Modern Japanese = Yayoi agriculturalist + Jomon + austronesian tribes. The genetics of both nations cluster greatly from sharing the same agricultural yayoi component due to assimilation but have separate ethno linguistic origins
Few Noticeable Errors: Han dynasty’s western territories location seems off, you showed the territory in the middle of taklamakan desert, it should be more north than that. Tang dynasty had more western territories, because they had fought wars in Persia. Dzungaria had Aksai-Chin region, because that’s the only way they can take to control Tibet (Dzungaria and Tibet was separated by Kunlun mountain, the eastern end of Kunlun was controlled by Qing dynasty which is the enemy of Dzungaria. The only way the can have control on Tibet is through Aksai-Chin)
fk sad turkic trying to made japan and korea are they sibling lel cause they are shameful of they own turkic origin which who get invade by the real turk then fuck they woman then made the men watch and belive that the one fucking they wife are they brother ( which is not cause the turk are outsider who come to invade the now day turk land who the native are not turk lol )
@@batukaganbat6093 they are no relaitve nation sbut they are share COMMON Origin in Sibira . Black Poeples: Banthu Peoples: South african , Tanzanian , Mozambiq, Madagascar and Kenyan Aborgines ( Black-White mix) : Niger-Congo (West) Peoples: Nigeria, Gabon,Congo,Senegal Eastern Aborgines : Dravidians( souh hinduistan ),Thamils,Sinotics(today chinese)Thai,Vietnamse,Malays,Australians and ınca peoples Early Farmers ( Mosttl white butt have black people features) : Semitic (West) Peoples : Eagptians, Magreps, Arabs and oher Malta,Sudan,Mouritania peoples Hamitic (East) Peoples : Some anatolian and middle east nations, Armenians and some caucasians, Mezopotamian, Judens . White Peoples: Indo Peoples (West) : Indians, Persians,Hellanic,Celts Siberian Peoples ( East) : Americans native,Peleo sibirians,Tıbet-Jomons,Yenısey(Zhao,Wei),Koreans,Tungus,Altaic,Ural peoples .
You need to read more history articles that were truly written by ancient historians, and combine those knowledge with archeology discoveries. You should not stick to the "history" created during the Joseon nationalist movement period
The area where the Joseonjok currently resides was originally Joseon land. It makes no sense that Joseon people lived in large numbers on Chinese land.
seems like the center of Asia is focused on China. make sense why Japanese uses Chinese characters now.. not sure with Korean? but i saw the old traditional building in Korea writing are in Chinese characters though...
Koreans ( a king 朝鲜王朝世宗李祹） created their own characters in 1446 , but the upper class people still use Chinese.........finally in the last 100 years , Koreans start to use their own characters 谚文 .
anyone that in east asian culture used chinese characters aka vietnam/korea/japan until we develop our own for some country it are more heavy change like vietnam chaging from Nom to latin , korea from chinese script to hangu but you still can find chinese writing on old building in vietnam / korea / japan
Koreans used to use Chinese characters but because the Korean language itself is very different from Chinese language in almost anyway imaginable, it was very impractical and cumbersome and hence in order to improve literacy in his country, King Sejong of Korea created Hangul that will be a better fit for the Korean language
In fact, Nam Việt (We call it Nan Yue(南越/南粤) in China) is a Chinese country instead of Vietnamese country (Vietnamese belongs to the ruled). Its king Zhao Tuo(赵佗) is a native of Hebei(河北) Province in China. Its capital is Panyu番禺 (Guangzhou), The residents of the capital area are Nanyue(南越族) and Han(汉族) .They merge with each other to form the current Han Cantonese(汉族广府民系). The official language is Chinese and local language. At that time, the nation in Vietnam was Luoyue(雒越/骆越族), so theoretically Nan Yue is not a Vietnamese country.
@@hai965 That's because they followed the Chinese system, compiled the history books of the previous dynasties by convention, and considered themselves to be the orthodox dynasties of China. The Mongol Empire, the predecessor of the Yuan Dynasty, was not considered China. Because it did not adopt the Chinese system, nor did it claim Chinese orthodoxy. Nan Yue followed the Qin Dynasty's system and spread Chinese culture in the area under its control. What's more, its territory was only Guangdong and Guangxi at the beginning, and its political center was always in Guangzhou. Later, after attacking Âu Lạc, it annexed northern Vietnam. Even the Vietnamese government believes that Vietnam's rule by China began with the demise of Âu Lạc by Nan Yue. In this way, the conclusion of whether Nanyue is a Chinese country or a Vietnamese country is already very clear, isn't it?
@@thaiduongdang3702 There is nothing wrong, but is it possible that your country has been annexed by a foreign country instead of "having a foreign king"?
Man, Nanyue is Vietnamese countries, king was truely chinese but his wives were vietnamese and they used Vietnam culture, like Tran dynasty (陳朝) that family came from Fujian and guangdong had usurped the throne, overthrew the Ly dynasty, which mean, Tran was chinese and control Yuenan against Chinese ( Song Dynasty ) Mongolia empire
those are the protectorates of the Tang Empire, according to the Old Book of Tang, the official historic document of the Tang Dynasty. According to the primary source, there were four protectorates under the Anxi protectorate. Also it had mentioned the Tang Empire had set up a Persia protectorate in modern day Iran. 高昌 汉车师前王之庭。汉元帝置戊己校尉于此。以其地形高敞，故名高昌。其故垒有八城。张骏置高昌郡，后魏因之。魏末为蠕蠕所据，后麹嘉称高昌王于此数代。贞观十四年，讨平之，以其地为西州。其高昌国境，东西八百里，南北五百里。寻置都督府，又改为金山都督府。 柳中 贞观十四年置 交河 县界有交河，水源出县北天山，一名祁连山，县取水名。地本汉车师前王庭 蒲昌 贞观十四年，于始昌故城置，县东南有蒲类海，胡人呼为婆悉海 天山 贞观十四年置，取祁连山为名。 北庭都护府 贞观十四年，侯君集讨高昌，西突厥屯兵于浮图城，与高昌相响应。及高昌平。二十年四月，西突厥泥伏沙钵罗叶护阿史那贺鲁率众内附，乃置庭州，处叶护部落。长安二年，改为北庭都护府。自永徽至天宝，北庭节度使管镇兵二万人，马五千匹；所统摄突骑施、坚昆、斩啜；又管瀚海、天山、伊吾三军镇兵万余人，马五千匹。至上元元年，陷吐蕃。旧领县一，户二千三百。天宝领县三，户二千二百二十六，口九千九百六十四。在京师西北五千七百二十里，东至伊州界六百八十里，南至西州界四百五十里，西至突骑施庭一千六百里，北至坚昆七千里，东至回鹘界一千七百里。 金满 流沙州北，前汉乌孙部旧地，方五千里。后汉车师后王庭。胡故庭有五城，俗号"五城之地"。贞观十四年平高昌后，置庭州以前，故及突厥常居之。 轮台 取汉轮台为名。 蒲类 海名 已上三县，贞观十四年与庭州同置. 瀚海军 开元中盖嘉运置，在北庭都护府城内，管镇兵万二千人，马四千二百匹 天山军 开元中，置西州城内，管镇兵五千人，马五百匹。在都护府南五百里。 伊吾军 开元中置，在伊州西北五百里甘露川，管镇兵三千人，马三百匹，在北庭府东南七百里。 盐治州都督府 盐禄州都督府 阴山州都督府 大漠州都督府 轮台州都督府 金满州都督府 玄池州 哥系州 咽面州 金附州 孤舒州 西盐州 东盐州 叱勒州 迦瑟州 冯洛州 已上十六番州，杂戎胡部落，寄于北庭府界内，无州县户口，随地治畜牧。
제 영상에서 수정하고 싶었던 부분들까지 이 영상에 있는 것을 보고 좋았습니다. 아무래도 님의 영상도, 저의 영상도한반도 부분이 비교적 세밀하게 나오고 그 외 지역은 상세하지 못 한 것이 한계인 듯 합니다 ^^;;궁금한 부분이 있는데 1880년경 조선이 청나라 색깔로 표시되는 것은 어째서 인가요?청나라의 간섭 때문인가요? 결국 청일전쟁이 조선에 벌어질 정도로 두 나라 사이에서 고전했다고는 하지만엄연히 독립된 국가였는데 말이죠.
+The Dragon Historian 임오군란 때 파병의 댓가로 맺은 조약의 내용은 상행위와 관련된 내용이었습니다. 속국이라는 표현 하나로 조선이 청나라의 영토가 되는것은 아니죠. 조선은 청나라와의 불평등조약 이후 다른 서양 제국주의 열강들과도 조약들을 맺습니다. 독자적인 외교권이 있었죠. 또한, 청나라는 조선에 대한 간섭으로 우위를 보이려 했지만 일본을 필두로 러시아, 미국, 영국 등 다른나라들이 인정하지 않았습니다. 조선 내 친청파,친러파,친일파 등의 세력 간 힘겨루기가 있었구요. 단지 조청조약의 한 단어로 조선이 청나라 땅인 것으로 하는 것은 잘못되었습니다. 오히려 그 문구는 조공관계를 가지고 조선 종주권으로 확대해석 주장했던 청나라의 바람이었죠. 조선이 청의 속국이 아니었고 다른 나라들도 조선을 청의 속국으로 여기지않았으니까요.
@@TheDragonHistorian 만약에 조선이 청의 속국이었다면 국기를 정할때 청의 조언대로 청나라의 국기와 똑같이 정하고 색만 다르게 함으로써 청의 속국이었음을 드러내지 않았을까요? 하지만 고종은 청의 마젠창의 제안을 거절하고 조선만의 독자적인 국기를 정했습니다. 이것만으로도 조선은 독립국가였다는 증거가 될 수 있고요 또 당시에 조선은 관세의 개념조차 없었을정도로 국제사회의 인식이 희박했습니다. 서구열강과의 조약중 하나에서 청나라가 원하는대로 속국표시를 했다고 속국으로 취급되는것은 이상하다고 생각합니다. 그리고 민비정권의 가장 큰 뒷배가 청나라였고 임오군란에서도 국왕이 위기를 느끼고 청나라에 도움을 요청한 것이지 그걸로 속국이라고 취급할 수 없다고 생각합니다.
@@msmmoa8935 청나라의 의도를 보면 알 수 있죠. 당시 19세기 청나라는 서구 국가들한테 뒤져라 처맞던 상태여서 자신들의 영토를 뺏기지 않기 위해 전까지는 그냥 자기들 영토에서 살게 냅뒀던 위구르지역도 신장이라는 이름을 대며 속국화 시켰습니다. 조선도 이와 다를바 없어요.
Some missing pieces...Indo-europan Yuezhi/Tocharians in early history and the Qiang and Tubo(early Tibetan) people who were major players at different periods in history. The areas in modern day Qinghai and Tibet was not a black hole, there were some powerful kingdoms there throughout history.
You're right, but it appears the video creator left out everything west of China on purpose. As you might notice, the Empire of Tibet is never shown, nor is anything else in the western parts of the map. These regions are only included when East Asian powers conquer them. With the amount of detail he put into making this video, it's evident that this is not a mistake, but rather a choice of preference to only include East Asian history (although whether or not Tibet and the Tarim Basin are/aren't East Asia is debatable).
some mistake： 1 Dong ou what appear in 190 BCE in this ，it was established by Yue as their fedual subject in 472 BCE ，after Yue annex Wu，they had too many land ，so Yue‘s king establish the subject manage south land. but Dong ou was survived after Chu annex Yue until Han combine their in 138 BCE. 2 when the Ming rise , he met Chen Youliang ， Zhang Shicheng and another enemy clique，but they haven't appear in the time.
This video is extremely wrong and heavily biased. 1- Rouran, Tuyuhun and Xianbei are Para-Mongolic peoples not Mongolic or Proto-Mongolic. Mongolic peoples found 0 state before Genghis Khan. 2-Tuoba was mix of Turkic and Para-Mongolic NOT Mongolic. 3- You counted Xiongnu as Turkic and Mongolic (by this logic Rouran and Tuyuhun are Turco-Mongolic too)😅😅 But Mongolic peoples didn’t even exist in that time according to expert scholars. Pls make new video and add Para-Mongolic
Naimans = Sekiz Oghuz Turks Keraits = another Mongolized Turkic tribe Three Merkits = Three Kurykans Ancient Tatars = Turkic and Para-Mongolic peoples nothing Mongolic about them
딱 적당한 지도 같구만 왜 몇몇 한국사람들이 더 난리인지 모르겠네...댓글 쭉 보다보니 그냥 땍땍거리면서 중국인 타령하는 애도 있고..난 오히려 조선이 청의 속국으로 표현되지 않은 것에서 한국사람이 더 좋아해야 할 지도가 아닌가 싶은데? 한국계 국가들도 잘 분류되어 있고.
본인이 해외 못가보셔서 모르지 인종차별 당해보세요 한국인들대상으로 욕하는 나라 한둘아니에요 괜히 일본보다 낫지라 생각하면 큰 오산이라 생각드는데요? 아직도 코리아라하면 후진국 아니면 중국 속국이라 생각해서 개깔봐요 특히 남미국가쪽이나 유럽권이든지요 유적지 낙서같은거나 호텔에서 민폐끼치고 하는거때매 이미지 않좋아요
저 영국 삽니다........ 의심가시면 IP추적해보세요.. 일본과 비교한 일도 없고요 막상 한국 토픽으로 대화해보면 그들은 선진국이러고 인식하고 있었는데, 시스템적으로 너무 후져서 충격 받는 일이 다반사입니다. 해외 안가보다니 웃기네요. 그 쪽에서 표현하신 유럽권에서 거주한 지 벌써 10년도 넘었습니다. 개인 의견을 외국인들이 대개 그렇게 인식하는듯 싸질러놓으신게 본인의 무지함을 표현하는 방법이신가본데 그저 우습기만 합니다
Usually, the East Asian culture sphere involves the people mentioned in this video. Sure, Tibetans are distantly related to Sinitic, same as Burmese, but they are usually only seen as tangentially part of it
@@NIDELLANEUM yes. But the other hand Tibet is culturally and, most importantly, ethnically/genetically close to Eastern Asia rather than India or Turkic countries. But yeah the cool thing about us is that we made our own and singular culture, independent from others.
Xiongnu is Turkic: . The predecessors of Huihe were Xiongnu. Because, customarily, they ride high-wheeled carts. They were also called Gaoche during the Yuan Wei times, or also called Chile, mistakenly rendered as Tiele. - Xin Tangshu, 232 Weishu, vol. 103 txt: "高車，[...] 其語略與匈奴同而時有小異，或云其先匈奴之甥也", tr: "The Gaoju, [...] their language and the Xiongnu's are similar though differ a little; or to say it differently, they are the sororal nephews/sons-in-laws of the Xiongnu” According to the Book of Wei, the Yuebans' language and customs were the same as the Gaoche, who were Turkic speakers. Yuebans(Weak Xiongnu) cut their hair and trimmed their ghee-smeared, sun-dried, glossy eyebrows evenly, and washed before meals three times everyday. Weishu, Vol. 102 "其風俗言語與高車同，而其人清潔於胡。俗剪髮齊眉，以醍醐塗之，昱昱然光澤，日三澡漱，然後飲食。" Chinese sources link the Tiele people and Ashina to the Xiongnu, According to the Book of Zhou and the History of the Northern Dynasties, the Ashina clan was a component of the Xiongnu confederation. Linghu Defen et al., Book of Zhou, Vol. 50. (in Chinese) Li Yanshou (李延寿), History of the Northern Dynasties, Vol. 99. (in Chinese) Uyghur Khagans claimed descent from the Xiongnu (according to Chinese history Weishu, the founder of the Uyghur Khaganate was descended from a Xiongnu ruler). The Gaoche are probably remnants of the ancient Red Di. Initially they had been called Dili. Northerners take them as Chile. Chinese take them as Gaoche Dingling. Their language, in brief, and Xiongnu [language] are the same yet occasionally there are small differences. Or one may say that they [Gaoche] are the junior relatives[18] of the Xiongnu in former times. The Gaoche migrate in search of grass and water. They dress in skins and eat meat. Their cattle and sheep are just like those of the Rouran, but the wheel of their carts are high and have very many spokes. - Weishu, 103 The forebears of the Tiele belonged to those Xiongnu descendants, having the largest divisions of tribes. They occupied the valleys, and were scattered across the vast region west of the Western Sea [Black Sea] At the area north of the Duluo River, are the Bugu (僕骨), Tongluo (同羅), Weihe (韋紇),[17] Bayegu (拔也古), Fuluo (覆羅), which were all called Sijin (Irkin). Other tribes such as Mengchen (蒙陳), Turuhe (吐如紇), Sijie (斯結),[a] Hun (渾), Hu (斛), Xue (薛) (or Huxue) and so forth, also dwelled in this area. They had a 20,000 strong invincible army. [...] The names of these tribes differ, but all of them can be classified as Tiele. The Tiele do not have a master, but are subjected to the both Eastern and Western Tujue (Göktürks) respectively. They don't have a permanent residence, and move with the changes of grass and water. - Suishu, 84
I don't know why I haven't seen this until now, I can't put into words how useful this is.
I'm glad I was able to help!
docs.google.com/document/d/1iCwWG60jRTwKtSaoVaWQKqsVfkLqKEvx2GD8_KItfrU/edit?usp=sharing
Here is the timeline document I wrote for this video, maybe it can help with your History of the World 2.0 video too. Although keep in mind that some of the details are missing, so for those you should probably watch the video at half speed or slower so you don't miss anything
***** That's perfect, thanks for sharing.
OMG U COMMENT THIS THIS IS WAY BETTER THAN TIGERSTAR'S VERSION OF EAST ASIA IM HAPPY THAT THE DRAGON HISTORIAN IS DOING MY COUNTRYS STORY DETAILY (china) and im not from that stooped mainland im from hk
Confucius Ideology Video Book th-cam.com/video/cJqtUPu3woE/w-d-xo.html
3:39 That goes so perfect with the music xD
sui China collapse
lol
Agree😂😂
Weeeeew
현대 사학에서 납득할만한편이네요 유튜브에서 만들어진 영상중에선 가장 좋습니다.
발해 부흥운동까지 정확히 표현하신 게 대단하네요...ㄷㄷ
ㅇㅈ ㅋㅋㅋ 정안은 한국인도 잘 모르던데,,
ㅇㅈ
발해운동은 요사같은데 나오는걸로암
정안국은 물론이고 소고구려도 있음
뭐 몇년이면 몰라도 거의 반세기 이상 눌러박힌 나라라서
As a Mongol, It looks pretty faultless to my knowledge of history. Except the northern yuan dynasty was basically divided between right wing and left wing. Khalkhas and Southern Mongols (Chahar, khorchin etc..). I'm referring to it because you decided to split four oirats which I think is a good decision.
Do you mean Inner Mongolians?
great video.
thank you very much
from Mongol
Batuka Ganbat One of my favorite empires is Mongolian
Love Mongol from Vietnam.
@台灣友邦計數器 hi
love mongol from China
蒙古属于东亚吗？😂这里的东亚更多是指文化方面的东亚吧，不然怎么会让越南这个东南亚国家进入东亚历史，就是俗称筷子文化圈或者儒家文化圈。
蒙古应该归入内亚游牧文化历史圈，蒙古应该是和突厥人，哈萨克人这些游牧民族一起的历史。从文化圈来说，蒙古不应该归入东亚，毕竟这些国家历史上都曾用过汉字，蒙古用的是维吾尔人创造的文字
정말 잘 만든 영상입니다 역사 덕후에게 성지가 될 듯 싶네요
Korea was splitted on Northern and Southern even in ancient times lol.
It was not, at least not with the same borders or in a cultural sesne.
do you mean 850ce? balhae and sinra?
Alex _ stop using fact!
Alex _ and they grew rich and north Korea? Chinese and north korea russians are all poor...
Probably an oxymoron
Very useful video and excellently made with some top notch songs in it which attracted me to it.
최근 한국사 공부하다가 눈에 띄길래 들어와봤습니다. 조회수 4만밖에 안되는데 이렇게나 난장판이라니 동아시아의 예민한 정치상황을 반영하는 것 같아서 안타깝기도 하네요. 한국사만 해도 머리아픈데 중국 고대의 그 많은 국가들, 그리고 베트남을 포함한 중국 외 국가들까지 세세히 반영하시다니 대단하십니다. 업로더분과 댓글에서 언급하신 Ollie Bye 님의 영상 즐겨찾기 해놓고 간간이 봐야겠습니다ㅎ 수고하세요~
유럽은 더 복잡하던디..조막만한 땅에서 치고박고 싸운역사라
@@diddudrn유럽은 일부 나라들 생략하지 않으면 이런 영상 만드는 거 자체가 거의 불가능하니ㅋㅋㅋ 신성 로마 제국에 소속된 나라들만 생각해도 어우
Great Video!
Thanks! You`re very good at eastasia history! (I`m Korean)
very well made
4:26 lol the music!
"aaaaaaaand China is broken again!"
没办法，社会矛盾积累需要突破口，除非能不断殖民其他地区，不然任何古代帝国都会分裂。
이런거 만드는거는 역시 이분이 갑인듯 하다
You forgot to include the Tibetan Empire. It was a huge player during Tang Dynasty.
Tang dynasty: *proceeds to almost have it's size*
No, Tibet not a part of video like India and other regions, until mongolian khoshuts conquered tibet in 17 century tibet dont participate
4:42 is the traditional korean rhythm:)
Well done. Very well done. I am not a professional historian, but I feel you made this from a very fair and objective perspective. I read some complaints and criticitical comments on the way you did. But, please don't be swayed by those nationalists and manipulators from different countries. Just give facts, only facts.
A Big hug from abroad for Koreans and people in other Asian countries who are constantly bullied by certain big country!!!
Pretty well done! Respect! It gives quite a good chronology. Some errors: 1) Naimans, Tatars, Khereids, Khamag Mongols/Borjigin were all Mongolic tribes, not actually Turkic. They all spoke the same language and Tatars on the Mongolian Steppes have not much to do with Tatarstan today or Tatars in Crime or Siberian Tatars. Just the name Tatar was bestowed to the Turkic tribes later. The name Tatar is the most wrongly used name in the history. Sometimes mixing with the word Tartaria. 2) Dinling was not Turkic, according to the recent research findings. They were Scythian/Indo-European with Tagar Culture, like Sogdians. But nowadays everyone claims all the old tribes as theirs. Pity for the historical science. Dinling was simply assimilated into neighboring the Turkic tribes and Mongolic Xianbei.
this is exactlywhat I learned from my school in korea. other korean people who are complaining must have skipped class
@@dou_june0v037 Are you saying that Koreans learn the history of the Tang Dynasty instead of the history of Korea?
@@dou_june0v037 I am Korean but I have never learned the history of Tang Dynasty.
@@dou_june0v037 But When Korean go to high school, Korean learn East Asian history and world history.
@@dou_june0v037 Koreans learn about Korean history at school😊
Can you please do an updated video on this?
I’m so curious to see how each language family displaced the other
Amazing from China, Japan, Korea (North And South), Mongolia, Russian Far East, Tibet, Taiwan, Manchuria, Perhaps parts of Vietnam and maybe a few others have very fascinating articles of recordings
China (China proper, Manchuria, Tibet, Taiwan)
@@rete5132 Taiwan is not China.
Taiwan was originally an independent country and was inhabited by indigenous people.
After the Dutch colonization began and the Japanese Zheng Chenggong drove out the Dutch, Han Chinese from the mainland began to migrate.
After that, Jurchen ruled Taiwan, but the Japanese Empire destroyed the Qing dynasty and Taiwan was annexed by Japan.
@山田次郎：琉球独立
@@山田次郎-e8i Taiwan refers to itself as the republic of China. I think it should be considered "China".
@@yidminselaks Taiwan was taken over by the Kuomintang government of the Republic of China.
Currently, most Taiwanese speak Chinese due to the Han Chinese assimilation policy, but ethnically speaking, more than 80% are non-Han Chinese.
잘 만들었군요..
아시아 역사... 한중일... 흥망성쇠를...전체적으로 볼 수 있어서...
几千年历史里整体上中国就是东亚的核心，也是东亚文明起始之地，毕竟筷子文化圈😂。
东亚其余国家都是地缘上的边缘国家，领土人口差距太大了。二战时期，日本侵略中国的时候，幻想中的大东亚国家，是想学满族一样统治中国（虽然现在满族已经被汉化了，文化灭族了）。日本也曾想把首都迁到北京，宣传整个东亚这个高度同质化的文明区域，所以并没有破坏北京皇城。
中国东部地区是亚欧大陆东部最肥沃的土地，只要中国不分裂（中国93%的人口是汉族，现代民族主义国家建构下很难分裂了，毕竟中国也不是弱国），不论哪个政府统治中国，中国都会是亚洲核心和主导者。毕竟体量差距太大了
Dai Viet opened its territory deep south into the DNA country
Such a Great Clip! Thanks for sharing such a nice work with us. Must took a bunch of time making this video.
이 사람 한국인이에요 ㅋㅋ
5:17 Genghis has joined the game
Then seconds later he left the game.
@@yanyu3121 He was too powerful and had to get nerfed
I'm from Sakha Republic (North-Eastern Siberia). We originated from Baikal territory but migrated to the north, theoretically in the past we were the small part of Xiongnu confederation. We have turkic, mongolic and tungusic in our bloods. Historically our enemies were Chinese, but I wish one time we will make a big union of East Asian people.
Respect to our East Asian blood brothers, expecially for Korea because I like your country very much and I've been there for many times.
Remember, we have the real chance to control the whole World. China, Korea, Japan, Mongolia, Manchuria and others, we will rule this world.
Thank you my brothers.
We will never forget our Yakut and siberian brothers in the north.
Maybe someday you guys have your own country and will be known as nordic countries in Asia far east because of your geography, culture, and looks of the people. You guys in siberia are the palest asians.
koreans are from baikal as well. We always had many proverbs about the lake and it's funny that the scientist tests a genetic squence found in a cave near Baikal. and the gene was closest to korean people. I am serious. I think Koreans were the true genes or people of baikal immigrated 7000 years ago. and still have the gene unlike other mongolic people. mongolians are now diverse. They share chinese white middle eastern blood.
中国不是你们的敌人 你们是南方农业社会的威胁 你们吃不饱饭的时候就得侵略中国。。。中国从来不会去你们那兔子不拉屎的地方主动侵略。。
pozk 16661 there are no such a enemy at all since it is a more than 2000 years journey with couples of Dynasties have been destroyed,the main blood of Huns,tungusic and mongols(even the golden blood of khan) are all mixed with Chinese Han people. The ancestor you mentioned are basically Chinese now, and you can not even tell from they looks . It’s like in the Roma age, Greek and Latin Roman people are enemy,but after hundreds years, the main people of Roma(Byzantine) are Greek people.
6:18 Azuchi-momoyama
그래도 정확하시다
HaHa, korea used to be conquered by china and was even a part of china !
Fun fact：Gojoseon was founded by a Chinese named 卫满, which is recorded in two ancient Chinese history books
No 😂 weiman was a Yan dynasty remnant. After the han dynasty conquered the Yan dynasty, weiman fled to gojoseon where he showed the king there how to use iron, and became a general. He then overthrew the king of gojoseon and ruled it for himself.
What are you talking about? According to 史記 and 魏略, Wiman came from Yan dynasty who became a ruler of Gojoseon by wearing 'Gojoseon clothes'('胡服', '蠻夷' in real document tho). In other words, Gojoseon existed before Wiman, and he surrendered the Gojoseon 'King Jun(準王)' and became king.
What you said is a big logical leap and not a fun fact. If you are Chinese, find and read objective books and face the truth.
it is because Gojoseon fought long time with Han.
@@psj5699 He fled when the yan state collapsed, yan is also a sinitic state fyi.
환빠들과 이 같은 영상을 보는게 싫다 ㅋㅋ 그리고 이게 잘못된게 뭐가있음 니들 역사 헛으로 배움?
역사를감성으로배운
Thanks for including Vietnam as part of East Asia
yeah in fact vietnam is a part of eastasia
they are from BAIYUE and QIN
@@前轱辘不转后轱辘转思 baiyue agree but qin ??
Wait, what ? why you thank ?
Óc chó hèn vl, éo bao gồm tao
thấy sang bắt quàng làm họ :))) VIE isnt EA, ok?
참고로 우리나라의 한민족은
예족과 맥족, 그리고 한(韓)족과 여러 소수족이 합쳐진 것입니다(주호와 우산 등). 지도에 나오는 예, 맥 그리고 삼한이 이를 의미합니다.
거기에 말갈향도 약간 첨가
당시 삼한은 지배층이 아닌 피지배층 토착민들이 대부분 고대일본어 혹은 그에 가까운 친척언어를 사용하던 야요이계였을거라는게 서양학계 주류학설이니 일본의 야요이족도 포함시켜야할것같음
Sdfp
@@kimurahundoshi4485 반도일본어설이 주류학설도 아니고 연구단계에 머물러 있는데 아직 검증이 필요한 학설을 넣는 건 아니라고 봄
@@kimurahundoshi4485 일본의 야요이 계통 자체가 유전적으로 지금 한국인들과 큰 차이가 없는데 삼한은 피지배 민족이고 야요이는 지배층이다? 뭔 소린지 모르겠네 거기다 주류 학설도 아니고?
거의 팩트만 써서 만들었구만, 중국인이 만들었으면 Koreanic 부분에 고구려가 있 수가 없다, 환빠는 쉿!
Nemo Kim 걍 팩트임 원나라시대도 짧지만 잘 표기했고
근데 저기서 요동이 진나라 영토로 표기되어 있는데 진시황이 요동에 비석을 세우라고 세운게 오늘 중국의 난하강이라고 요하강보다 더 서쪽에 있는 지역이래요 그렇기 때문에 진나라가 요동 땅을 차지했다는 근거는 없어요
Bgm을 들어보셈... 메이플스토리임...
진짜 환빠들 ㅅㅂㅋㅋㅋㅋ
환빠가 뭐에용??
Very nice!
류쿠왕국을 japonic으로 분류한게 좀 흠인듯. 류쿠왕국은 보통 남방계 중국인들이 대다수고 19세기말에 강제 병합당한거라 인종학적으로는 japonic이 아님. 오키나와가 일본령임을 부정하는게 아니라 역사적으로 japonic으로 분류해선 안된다 이거임.
Japonic은 민족이 아니라 언어학적 분류입니다. 류큐인들의 언어인 류큐어파는 일본어와 함께 일본어족 (Japonic languages)에 속합니다.
Absolutely Amazing work as always!
However, one nitpick, you forgot the three kingdoms of 14th century Okinawa; Chuzan Hokuzan, and Nanzan, which split the island until 1429, when the Ryukyu kingdom comes in, but other than that, I see no problems.
One question though, I noticed that during the Sengoku, you showed many of the Japanese clans and the Ikko-Ikki as seperate entities from the Ashikaga government, were these actually independent states? I always assumed they were all subservient to the central government, but warring among st themselves.
Thanks for telling me about the three kingdoms of Okinawa! I really had no idea.
As for the Sengoku Period, I like to think it as similar to the Warlord Era in China. Just like many of the warlord cliques were fighting for control of the Beiyang Government in Beijing, the clans were fighting for control of Kyoto. Therefore, whichever clan was in control of Kyoto at the time was shown as the Ashikaga Shogunate in the video.
Fyi, Japan wasn't united country at the time.
+KoreanSentry Neither was any of the steppe countries. I couldn't possibly map out every individual daimyo.
Karakuni Nara 류쿠 왕국이 류쿠 열도를 통일하기 전에 오키나와에도 삼국시대가 있었다고 하네요.
All those people fighting with broken English in the comments- The Chinese thinking they were the only conscious species in the world, The Koreans believing their ancient empires were galactic, and extra...
I'm Korean and this video is very good. I dont understand why some people deny this.
muchim golbaengi ancient Tibet empire also belongs to east asia
Thank you for sharing. I do love it.
Awesome! I can see the overloaded amount of effort put into this video and mostly accurate.
Just a little flaw that I found.
( 4:08 ) I believe that Anxi Protectorate of Tang was taken over by the Tibetan Empire (吐蕃) instead of the Uyghurs. Gansu area was only to be able to be back into Tang's hand due to internal turmoil of Tibet later on and the Uyghurs gained respective Independences soon after. Example Reference: /watch?v=-foZ5RcCm8U (13:06 - 13:58)
What do you think?
Hi! I'm glad that you enjoyed the video. At 4:08, I showed that the Anxi Protectorate got destroyed by a nation not inside the scope of this map - i.e. the Tibetan Empire. However, I did show Gansu being taken over by the Uyghur Khanate. Is that what you were pointing out?
Oh, OK my bad it looked like Uyghurs took over the area from the Gansu pathway so I thought they were the ones that later took over Tarim Basin. It makes sense now.
It is interesting to see how Japan is so peacefull untill 16th century, but the mainland countries like China and Korea are fighting with themselves even in BC era
I guess it's a Land and that's a island?
Because China has detailed historical materials to record these wars, but Japan does not, people today mainly rely on historical materials to understand the past.
bcs japan was tribe at that time
Sorry for the really really long wait. But it's finally here! I hope you guys enjoy :)
I also apologize that the video looks somewhat out of focus (that's the best way I can describe it). I had to cut down the quality a little bit while rendering the video in Premiere Pro and then TH-cam butchered it. Even the colors were modified slightly, for example Russia is supposed to be a much darker shade of green, etc. Anyway, I hope that doesn't get in your way of watching the video.
EDIT: It seems like the colors are back to normal now, I guess it just took TH-cam really long to process the whole thing. The out-of-focusy feel is still there though. Thank you guys for watching regardless!
EDIT: I just noticed a mistake that I made, Mongolia after 1992 should be just "Mongolia," not the Mongolian People's Republic.
xianghou bc 1000 or 500 born in .
Mongol = Turk We are Altaic people . Ok You make mongol and Turk but you forgive alot Turkic dynsty and country
sorry，I have opinion of you.You're a typical Korean，it's complete ignorance for West of ancient China（central Asia）and the Tibetan Empire（Stress）.
ı now.
:D
very useful
I just found your chain , very good content and great video !!
"Proto-Ainu" is an odd way of referring to the peoples of the Japanese archipelago in the ancient past. The more widely accepted term across disciplines is simply "Jomon peoples"
Agreed. Especially seeing as the Ainu people have roots in various peoples around the Sea of Okhotsk, not only the Jomon.
You're right, but the distinction is still valid.
While all pre-Yayoi inhabitants of the Japanese islands are considered Jomon people, genetic and historical evidence has revealed that the Jomon were not a heterogenous group. Despite sharing many cultural similarities, Jomon people from northern Japan and Jomon people from southern Japan also had plenty of differences.
Jomon remains from Ryukyu and Kyushu are genetically very different from Jomon remains from Hokkaido and Tohoku. The southern Jomon were more closely related to early continental East Asians and Taiwanese aboriginals, and the northern Jomon were more closely related to coastal Paleolithic Siberian groups. And what we know of their cultures from archeological, oral, and written historical evidence backs that up: While southern Jomon society was semi-agricultural and in part matriarchal with female chieftains and priestess cults, the northern Jomon were primarily hunter-gatherers who were less matriarchal, more tribal, and practiced a more nature-heavy form of animism.
So yeah, it's good to separate the two Jomon cultures, but I also agree that calling them "Jomon" and "Proto-Ainu" is not the best choice of names. "Northern Jomon" and "Southern Jomon" would work just fine.
great !! Love from Korea
East Asia is a great land! It has a long culture and hardworking people!
와우 잘 보겠습니다.. 드래곤님 요즘은 뭐 하시는지요. 오늘 드래곤님 영상들을 접하게 되었는데 다 공부하고 싶어요. 감사합니다.
Why can't we ignore our petty differences and notice our many similarities? We are a people of long history and rich culture. We are among the most diligent and intelligent people in the world. And yet, East Asia remains divided while America has US (50 states) and Europe has European Union (28 states)
Why do we Asians have to be considered inferior to US and EU? Some of the most developed cities in the world are in East Asia and we manufacture cutting edge technology like semiconductor wafers, electronic gadgets, automotives and computer software here in Asia. We definitely could rule the world if we want to and only if we work together.
Why can't we form an alliance that serves the interest of East Asians? Even South East Asia has ASEAN which looks after the interest of SE Asian countries. Surely we too, can do the same if we put our differences aside.
Amen to that!
+Daniel Liu, I agree that our histories run deeper than other nations, possibly because of longer histories and long memories. But that does not mean we can take steps in the right direction. As Chinese, China's biggest trade partners after the USA, are Japan, South Korea and Taiwan. (Source: Wikipedia / List of the largest trading partners of China). Not mentioned is also Hong Kong, which China also trades regularly with.
If we can continue trade with these countries, despite our rivalries with them, then it is already possible that we can work together despite our differences.
+Daniel Liu Oh then it is tricky indeed. As mainland Chinese, what I do know is that our government has proposed the "One Country, Two Systems" to Taiwan too. Hopefully our governments can resolve this issue peacefully. We still have trade going on between us, so conflict is only going to affect our economies.
神州 Shenzhou Are you Han's Betrayer?
there's no such thing as rivalry between Korean and China. Korea is a perpetual slave state sucking masters for protection, while China is a superpower. Putting Korea and China in the same sentence is like putting Panama along the US.
Northern Laos and Central Laos were Vietnamese territories since 1479
Balhae is good because it is correctly written as Korean history
Lol shanghai bgm from maplestory? :D
Lmao we all like maplestory.
it's like europa universalis 4
I've just noticed Kara Del is positioned in the wrong place
vietic have baiyue, min yue, bai yue means one hundred ethnics of yue, yue means viet
Viet/Yue original people were the Melanesian + Austronesian. Basically, the original people that inhabited in the Northern province of Vietnam, such as the Hoabinhian and Dong Son people, weren't anything like modern day Vietnamese. They looked like the Semang from Malaysia (From the Hoabinh era) and Makassan ethnic from Sulawesi, Indonesia (from the Dong Son culture) before the Chinese migrated to the region. Majority of today's modern Vietnameses don't look like these people due to many waves of Chinese migrations, especially people from the lower Yangtze river. Source: 1) www.drnguyenviet.com/?id=5&cat=1&cid=22 2) books.google.com/books?id=5eEASHGLg3MC&pg=PA286&lpg=PA286&dq=the+cambridge+encyclopedia+of+hunters+and+gatherers+Hoabinhians&source=bl&ots=E0qt-KIbgj&sig=GFkhUiwshvVFJNpltwKjWw6uVx0&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj2v--h6-jNAhXGSiYKHS3zCZcQ6AEIKzAD#v=onepage&q=the%20cambridge%20encyclopedia%20of%20hunters%20and%20gatherers%20Hoabinhians&f=false Learn the truth, would you?
yes but they has been sinified....(Guang Dong and Guang Xi..)
According to the official history of Vietnam-《大越史記全書》Đại Việt sử ký、《欽定越史通鑑綱目》Khâm Định Việt Sử Thông Giám Cương Mục、《越史略》Đại Việt sử lược 、《嶺南摭怪•鴻龐氏傳》
Lĩnh Nam chích quái
自鴻龐氏hung Pang，曰涇陽王Kinh Duong Vuong，系出神農Shengnong ，首肇封疆VIET
2879 BC to 258 BC legend of the era of hung Pang Dynasty
神農Shengnong -帝明+婺仙女-祿續+洞庭君神龍女-崇纜Lạc Long Quân +嫗姬
Shennong 神農氏grew in Jiangshui姜水, Baoji County of Shaanxi Province中國陝西, and established Chen as the capital
In 2879BC, Loc Tuc祿續, a chinese man born in Hunan province of China湖南省, he was also as known as Kinh Duong Vuong
崇纜's father is祿續，祿續's father is帝明，帝明's grandfather is神農
神農氏
Shennong -Chinese
帝明--Chinese
祿續--Chinese
崇纜--Lạc Long Quân
257 BC - 207 BC Thục dynasty瓯雒国
An Duong Vuong安阳王蜀泮, a chinese from state of Shu蜀国（Sichuan, China）founded the kingdom of Âu Lac in the area of present-day northern Vietnam.
Shupan annexed Van Lang
After assembling an army, he defeated King Hùng Vương XVIII, the last ruler of the Hồng Bàng dynasty, around 257 BC. He proclaimed himself An Dương Vương ("King An Dương"). He then renamed Văn Lang as Âu Lạc
……………………………………………………………………………
207-111 BC Nanyue南越國
赵佗 was a general of Qin--chinese ，Around 180 to 179 BC, Âu Lạc was annexed by Nanyue南越國
When 秦世皇 unified China in 221 BC, one of his biggest project was to conquest/pacify rest of what we know as Linnan嶺南, and migrate large number of Chinese to this land.
Qin Shi Huang send 500,000 Qin soldiers and several millions of migrants, traders, families to Lingnan（Nanyue）
includes Âu Lac（Northern Vietnam）
When Qin collapsed, the de facto general governor of that part of China, Zhao Tuo, deliberately cut off it from rest of China to avoid the chaos of warfare, in effect established itself as an independent kingdom, NanYue, which was the name of the province which he was a deputy governor of sort.
Once Han Dynasty was on solid footing, Han Chinese immediately turned attention to this once a province of China, and eventually, incorporate this into Han proper.
The process, including armed conflict, trade embargos, and other form of negotiation, took over 100 years. From all indication, Zhao Tuo himself want to eventually reunite with rest of China proper, but waiting for opportune time (political climate in China, i.e. decent rulers in Han’s court). Han Dynasty allow Zhao Tuo keep this “emperor” title in NanYue for rest of his life
So, during that intern 100 years, NanYue WAS a vassal State of Han. as it is, by all account, a separate Chinese kingdom, founded by Chinese general (who was born in a city 200 miles from Beijing, 1300 miles from Northern Vietnam), with large percentage of subjects migrated from other part of China. NanYue is, culturally and historically, Chinese.
..............................................................................................................
111 BC-938
After the 2nd century BC，The Chinese ruled northern Vietnam for more than 1,000 years 漢朝、東吳、晋朝、南朝、隋朝、唐朝和南漢
Sorry but Vietnamese don't speak Chinese, our language is too different to the Chinese language so im pretty sure that there is a significant native population (or early comers from ancient China) that were not Melanesian nor Austronesian and was still very different from the modern Chinese. So in the end we Vietnamese have our native (or early comers) blood.
+Vinh Bảo
Vietnamese =Admixture of Han chinese + Khmer，not Yue people
Your Vietnamese language has changed
Baiyue=Yue+Wu+Minyue+Dongou+Nanyue+Au Lac
Zhuang people are Au Lac people
Xi-Ou were proto-Tai Kadai O1a. If Vietnamese were Luo Yue's descandants. Thier language must one of Tai branch. Because all of Luo Yue mixed with Xi-Ou (proto Tai-Kadai)，But today Vietnamese language belong to Mon-Khmer language. It contrast with Vietnamese's claim.（Mon-Khmer language-Mon Khmer Vietnamese）
Ancient Champa was an Austronesian kingdom，not austroasiatic（Mon-Khmer）
Minyue and Dongou
Taiwanese aborigines（austronesian） high frequencies O1a-M119-89.6%，ancient Taiwan aborigines were related to the ancient Minyue
Gou-Wu and Yu-Yue
A 2007 analysis of the DNA recovered from human remains in archeological sites of prehistoric peoples along the Yangtze River in China also shows high frequencies of Haplogroup O1 in the Neolithic Liangzhu culture（Gou-Wu and Yu-Yue）
The ancient Yue people created the Hemudu culture (河姆渡文化, 7800-7100 bp) and the Liangzhu culture 良渚文化(5300-4200 bp)
proto Tai-Kadai
austronesian
Baiyue
They belong to the same Group
BUT,Vietnam O1a-M119 only 6%
So your Vietnamese ancestors are not yue people
perfect video from Turkey
TDH님 메이플 BGM을 자주쓰시네요~ 역사채널로는 님이 갑이신것같아요 ㅎㅎ
어떤게 메이플스토리 브금이에요??
+TV팥빵 이 영상에 나온 브금 전부 다요 ㅋㅋ
Wouldn't the Proto-Mongols have been further east, somewhere around northeastern China and far eastern Russia? The lands of present-day Mongolia were the center of several major Turkic confederations before the Mongolic-speaking peoples arrived on the scene, so it makes sense that the Proto-Turkic peoples were there and the Proto-Mongolic peoples were to their east. I've always been partial to the idea that the Xiongnu were Proto-Turkic and the Xianbei were proto-Mongolic.
Hunnu(Xiongnu) is mongolian
@@Orgil. That's inconclusive. The prevailing theory is that the Xiongnu (Huns) were proto-Turkic, just like the groups that immediately followed them like the Gokturks and the Old Uyghurs. The Xianbei, located further to the east, were proto-Mongolic and moved in to fill the avoid after the proto-Turkic peoples moved out into Central Asia and Siberia.
@@hexkobold9814 rouran is mongolian
@@Orgil. Xiongnu were Turkic just like Tiele lol
@@Orgil. Xianbei and Rouran are Para-Mongolic not Turkic or Mongolic
Lol the same thing happens to me. I always save my videos in 1080p and after they're uploaded to TH-cam, I can only view them in 720p.
As you can see, Yue people is Chinese. They got rule by Nam Việt. Its mean Yue people in Nam Việt territory is half Vietnamese. Chinese people always said Vietnamese is old chinese people from Yue.
My friend, "Nam Việt" in Cantonese is same as "NamYue", the meaning is "South Yue(粤or越) people". The key point is whom and why the people make name and pronunciation of "Nam"(South). If Vietnamese really ruled this area, why they didn't make the name and sound as it's own? "Nam" in Chinese writing system and pronunciation direct to "South". The name is the real history.
@@sonicwu3428 in 1802 nguyễn dynasty ask qing dynasty to change đại việt( vn name at that time ) to nam việt which mean việt people live in the south of north (china ) dynasty but qing emperor don't agree because if vn reclaim the name nam việt it will include guangxi and quangdong province , so nguyễn dynasty change the name to việt nam and qing emperor agree with this name
Nice video.
Turks:
Xiongnu
Göktürks
Eastern Göktürks
Western Göktürks
Tuoba Wei
Eastern Wei
Western Wei
Yenisei Kyrgyz
Uyghurs
Qocho
Yarkent Khanate
East Turkestan
(Golden Horde)
(Chagatai)
Turkic has always been a predominantly spoken language, used at the courts of the local rulers, in the army, by rural or nomadic populations, and as a lingua franca among the multiethnic tribal confederations. It was even the language of communication in the Mongol army. Turkic has also been a supra-regional language of communication among smaller communities of speakers of minority languages and a means of communication among people of different ethnic backgrounds in certain social and professional groups, e.g. the Bāzārī class in Teheran.
Proto-Türkçe'nin konuşulduğu en erken tarih ne zaman olabilir? Çoğu kaynak MÖ 500 dese de inandırıcı gelmiyor
@@born_this_way Özellikle Proto-Moğolca ve Proto-Slavcadan daha yaşlı olduğu bariz.
@@born_this_way Dallanıp budaklanması Oğur dili ile ayrılma falan düşünülürse mö 500 çok geç bir tarih.
@@Sadoyasturadoglu Proto-Moğolca çok yeni zaten bildiğüm kadarıyla Cengiz Han döneminde konuşuluyordu. Ayrıca haklısın bu kadar geç olmamalı
突厥只是东方的失败者罢了，被唐朝击败驱逐到亚洲西部的失败游牧民族，
The historical Mongols were a federation of heterogenous groups of different nomad peoples of "Tartar" and also Türkish origin. The word "Mongol" is derived from the name of a tribe called Mongɣol or Manqol. Even if the cultural levels of these ethnic groups were different, they had a common language and a common culture which made their unification under the hand of a strong leader easier. In 1206, Temüjin (1155 or 1167-1227) of the Borjigid line of the Mongɣol adopted the title of Great Khan (qaɣan, in Chinese kèhán! 可汗). He is known as Činggis Qaɣan (Genghis Khan). Under his leadership the Mongols destroyed the Western Xia 西夏 (1038-1227) and Jin 金 (1115-1234) empires and conquered central Asia. The successors of Činggis Qaɣan created the largest empire that ever existed in premodern history. Yet this empire soon disintegrated into several states (ulus), one of which was China, ruled by the Yuan dynasty 元 (1279-1368) that was founded by Qubilai Qaɣan (Emperor Shizu 元世祖, r. 1260-1294), a grandson of Činggis.
Fantastic work! Any chance you'll do a map like this for South East Asia?
I believe China, Korea and Japan should make an East Asian Ally like European Union or ASEAN and stop fighting each other. We are the far most richest and strongest nations among the whole Oriental Asia, and no matter it is, we should stop argue and fighting each other for their only own benefits. If we unite, we could be the most faithful and strongest friends in the world.
War is Not a Game nice theory.
But that wont happend.
The u.s won't aggre.
USA rejected your proposal, and replaced the President of Korean.
haha we hate f*cking communists
Taiwan is true China
@@hurrfgghhheewweddfgghhjhgffre we hate slave nations too
I learned that Korea has been around much longer than Japan.
Yamato people came from the peninsula after all, modern Japanese are a mixture between Jomon people and Yamato
Of course, it became civilized from the area close to China.
Korean history dates back to Goryeo.
The indigenous people of the Korean Peninsula and the Japanese archipelago were the Jomon people, and the Yayoi people who came from southern China and the Jomon people mixed little by little, and the Yamato people were born.
The Yamato people (Wajin) of Kyushu lived in the southern part of the Korean peninsula, and the Han people lived in the northern part of the Korean peninsula.
However, as the Tungusic tribe called Buyeo invaded the Liaodong Peninsula, the Han people fled to the south and interbred with the Wa people, giving birth to the Korean people.
In terms of genetics, Han + Japanese + Tungus = modern Korean DNA.
People who fled to Japan after the collapse of Baekje and Goguryeo had the genes of the Han O2 lineage.
@@山田次郎-e8i yeah the genetic/historic relationship between Korea and japan is similar to that of Turkey and Greece and I feel like there’s a huge misconception about the two peoples having a common origin. The first people to inhabit the Korean Peninsula were japonic speaking peoples with a similar genetic makeup to modern Japanese people until the proto koreanic speakers arrived from the steppe assimilating with them creating the modern Korean ethnicity. Modern Koreans = Tungus/mongol/Siberian tribes + yayoi agriculturalist. Modern Japanese = Yayoi agriculturalist + Jomon + austronesian tribes. The genetics of both nations cluster greatly from sharing the same agricultural yayoi component due to assimilation but have separate ethno linguistic origins
@ganggang2537 Austronesian DNA is nearly absent in Japan, unless you are talking about Ryukyu Islands
Few Noticeable Errors:
Han dynasty’s western territories location seems off, you showed the territory in the middle of taklamakan desert, it should be more north than that.
Tang dynasty had more western territories, because they had fought wars in Persia.
Dzungaria had Aksai-Chin region, because that’s the only way they can take to control Tibet (Dzungaria and Tibet was separated by Kunlun mountain, the eastern end of Kunlun was controlled by Qing dynasty which is the enemy of Dzungaria. The only way the can have control on Tibet is through Aksai-Chin)
5:16 mongolia joined the server
Nanyue was established by zhao tuo, who was a general in the qin
훌륭하다..!
세심한것까지 표현을했다.!
Altaic Peoples in History of East Asia - Korea, Turkic, Mongolic, Tungusic, Japonic in Altai Family
LOL，nobody want to become the 'relative' of stupid turkey
Sporting Nature yeah japonic is mixed Austronesian and Northeast asian/Korean.
fk sad turkic trying to made japan and korea are they sibling lel cause they are shameful of they own turkic origin which who get invade by the real turk then fuck they woman then made the men watch and belive that the one fucking they wife are they brother ( which is not cause the turk are outsider who come to invade the now day turk land who the native are not turk lol )
Japanese is also categorized as an isolated group like Korea...Austronesian theory is just a theory
@@batukaganbat6093 they are no relaitve nation sbut they are share COMMON Origin in Sibira .
Black Poeples:
Banthu Peoples: South african , Tanzanian , Mozambiq, Madagascar and Kenyan
Aborgines ( Black-White mix) :
Niger-Congo (West) Peoples: Nigeria, Gabon,Congo,Senegal
Eastern Aborgines : Dravidians( souh hinduistan ),Thamils,Sinotics(today chinese)Thai,Vietnamse,Malays,Australians and ınca peoples
Early Farmers ( Mosttl white butt have black people features) :
Semitic (West) Peoples : Eagptians, Magreps, Arabs and oher Malta,Sudan,Mouritania peoples
Hamitic (East) Peoples : Some anatolian and middle east nations, Armenians and some caucasians, Mezopotamian, Judens .
White Peoples:
Indo Peoples (West) : Indians, Persians,Hellanic,Celts
Siberian Peoples ( East) : Americans native,Peleo sibirians,Tıbet-Jomons,Yenısey(Zhao,Wei),Koreans,Tungus,Altaic,Ural peoples .
China must not manipulate Korean history.
是韩国棒子一天天意淫好吧😂
You need to read more history articles that were truly written by ancient historians, and combine those knowledge with archeology discoveries. You should not stick to the "history" created during the Joseon nationalist movement period
告诉我这上面地图多少内容要读中国史书
true, but now, I hope china don't steal our culture
@@eiejvowbw other way around
I think this video is absolutely right. I am vietnam
no, north vietnam will invade Guangdong, Guangxi and Hainan.
=)))
Stephen Zhao you should look at the Taiwan, Hongkong and Singapore. Some days all four of us will join up and beat the crap out of China
i hate Dirty China mainland government,but i listen Chinese song everyday ~~ i hope the Republic of China return to China again ~~
Trong Hoang Phan land? More lime forest
The music at 5:35 is fuckin awesome
The area where the Joseonjok currently resides was originally Joseon land. It makes no sense that Joseon people lived in large numbers on Chinese land.
Where did you get the music for your videos from? They're pretty catchy
Maplestory bgm
Shanghai waitan!
6:57 name of the song please
Awesomebob99 (3) MapleStory - Mu Lung Dojo 4
seems like the center of Asia is focused on China. make sense why Japanese uses Chinese characters now.. not sure with Korean? but i saw the old traditional building in Korea writing are in Chinese characters though...
Koreans ( a king 朝鲜王朝世宗李祹） created their own characters in 1446 , but the upper class people still use Chinese.........finally in the last 100 years , Koreans start to use their own characters 谚文 .
anyone that in east asian culture used chinese characters aka vietnam/korea/japan until we develop our own for some country it are more heavy change like vietnam chaging from Nom to latin , korea from chinese script to hangu but you still can find chinese writing on old building in vietnam / korea / japan
Koreans used to use Chinese characters but because the Korean language itself is very different from Chinese language in almost anyway imaginable, it was very impractical and cumbersome and hence in order to improve literacy in his country, King Sejong of Korea created Hangul that will be a better fit for the Korean language
@@inouelenhatduyvietnamese accepted latin, korean created hangul, japanese added the character
스타일이 많이 달라지셨네여. 년도 넘어가는게 빨라짐
good job
Not really
이 영상에서 첫번째로 나온 음악의 제목이 뭐죠?
You skipped year 263.
In fact, Nam Việt (We call it Nan Yue(南越/南粤) in China) is a Chinese country instead of Vietnamese country (Vietnamese belongs to the ruled). Its king Zhao Tuo(赵佗) is a native of Hebei(河北) Province in China. Its capital is Panyu番禺 (Guangzhou), The residents of the capital area are Nanyue(南越族) and Han(汉族) .They merge with each other to form the current Han Cantonese(汉族广府民系). The official language is Chinese and local language. At that time, the nation in Vietnam was Luoyue(雒越/骆越族), so theoretically Nan Yue is not a Vietnamese country.
what's wrong with having a foreign king
China having Manchurian and Mongol rulers was still considered China tho
@@hai965 That's because they followed the Chinese system, compiled the history books of the previous dynasties by convention, and considered themselves to be the orthodox dynasties of China. The Mongol Empire, the predecessor of the Yuan Dynasty, was not considered China. Because it did not adopt the Chinese system, nor did it claim Chinese orthodoxy. Nan Yue followed the Qin Dynasty's system and spread Chinese culture in the area under its control. What's more, its territory was only Guangdong and Guangxi at the beginning, and its political center was always in Guangzhou. Later, after attacking Âu Lạc, it annexed northern Vietnam. Even the Vietnamese government believes that Vietnam's rule by China began with the demise of Âu Lạc by Nan Yue. In this way, the conclusion of whether Nanyue is a Chinese country or a Vietnamese country is already very clear, isn't it?
@@thaiduongdang3702 There is nothing wrong, but is it possible that your country has been annexed by a foreign country instead of "having a foreign king"?
Man, Nanyue is Vietnamese countries, king was truely chinese but his wives were vietnamese and they used Vietnam culture, like Tran dynasty (陳朝) that family came from Fujian and guangdong had usurped the throne, overthrew the Ly dynasty, which mean, Tran was chinese and control Yuenan against Chinese ( Song Dynasty ) Mongolia empire
great job
those are the protectorates of the Tang Empire, according to the Old Book of Tang, the official historic document of the Tang Dynasty. According to the primary source, there were four protectorates under the Anxi protectorate. Also it had mentioned the Tang Empire had set up a Persia protectorate in modern day Iran.
高昌 汉车师前王之庭。汉元帝置戊己校尉于此。以其地形高敞，故名高昌。其故垒有八城。张骏置高昌郡，后魏因之。魏末为蠕蠕所据，后麹嘉称高昌王于此数代。贞观十四年，讨平之，以其地为西州。其高昌国境，东西八百里，南北五百里。寻置都督府，又改为金山都督府。
柳中 贞观十四年置
交河 县界有交河，水源出县北天山，一名祁连山，县取水名。地本汉车师前王庭
蒲昌 贞观十四年，于始昌故城置，县东南有蒲类海，胡人呼为婆悉海
天山 贞观十四年置，取祁连山为名。
北庭都护府 贞观十四年，侯君集讨高昌，西突厥屯兵于浮图城，与高昌相响应。及高昌平。二十年四月，西突厥泥伏沙钵罗叶护阿史那贺鲁率众内附，乃置庭州，处叶护部落。长安二年，改为北庭都护府。自永徽至天宝，北庭节度使管镇兵二万人，马五千匹；所统摄突骑施、坚昆、斩啜；又管瀚海、天山、伊吾三军镇兵万余人，马五千匹。至上元元年，陷吐蕃。旧领县一，户二千三百。天宝领县三，户二千二百二十六，口九千九百六十四。在京师西北五千七百二十里，东至伊州界六百八十里，南至西州界四百五十里，西至突骑施庭一千六百里，北至坚昆七千里，东至回鹘界一千七百里。
金满 流沙州北，前汉乌孙部旧地，方五千里。后汉车师后王庭。胡故庭有五城，俗号"五城之地"。贞观十四年平高昌后，置庭州以前，故及突厥常居之。
轮台 取汉轮台为名。
蒲类 海名
已上三县，贞观十四年与庭州同置.
瀚海军 开元中盖嘉运置，在北庭都护府城内，管镇兵万二千人，马四千二百匹
天山军 开元中，置西州城内，管镇兵五千人，马五百匹。在都护府南五百里。
伊吾军 开元中置，在伊州西北五百里甘露川，管镇兵三千人，马三百匹，在北庭府东南七百里。
盐治州都督府 盐禄州都督府 阴山州都督府
大漠州都督府 轮台州都督府 金满州都督府
玄池州 哥系州 咽面州
金附州 孤舒州 西盐州
东盐州 叱勒州 迦瑟州
冯洛州 已上十六番州，杂戎胡部落，寄于北庭府界内，无州县户口，随地治畜牧。
安西大都护府 贞观十四年，侯君集平高昌，置西州都护府，治在西州。显庆二年十一月，苏定方平贺鲁，分其地置濛池、昆陵二都护府。分其种落，列置州县。于是，西尽波斯国，皆隶安西都护府。仍移安西都护府理所于高昌故地。三年五月，移安西府于龟兹国。旧安西府复为西州。龙朔元年，西域吐火罗款塞，乃于于阗以西、波斯以东十六国，皆置都督，督州八十，县一百一十，军府一百二十六，仍立碑于吐火罗以志之。咸亨元年四月，吐蕃陷安西都护府。至长寿二年，收复安西四镇，依前于龟兹国置安西都护府。至德后，河西、陇右戍兵皆征集，收复两京。上元元年，河西军镇多为吐蕃所陷。有旧将李元忠守北庭，郭昕守安西府，二镇与沙陀、回鹘相依，吐蕃久攻之不下。建中元年，元忠、昕遣使间道奏事，德宗嘉之，以元忠为北庭都护，昕为安西都护。其后，吐蕃急攻沙陀、回鹘部落，北庭、安西无援，贞元三年，竟陷吐蕃。
北庭都护府 本龟兹国。显庆中，自西州移府治于此。东至焉耆镇守八百里，西至疏勒镇守二千里，南至于阗二千里，东北至北庭府二千里，南至吐蕃界八百里，北至突骑施界雁沙川一千里。安西都护府，镇兵二万四千人，马二千七百匹。都护兼镇西节度使。
安西都护所统四镇
龟兹都护府 本龟兹国。其王姓白，理白山之南。去瓜州三千里，胜兵数千。贞观二十二年，阿史那社尒破之，虏龟兹王而还，乃于其地置都督府，领蕃州之九。至显庆三年，破贺鲁，仍自西州移安西府置于龟兹国城
毗沙都督府 本于阗国。在葱岭北二百里，胜兵数千。俗多机巧。其王伏阇信，贞观二十二年入朝。上元二年正月，置毗沙都督府，初管蕃州五。上元元年，分为十。在安西都护府西南二千里
疏勒都督府 本疏勒国。在白山之南，胜兵二千。去瓜州四千六百里。贞观九年，遣使朝贡，自是不绝。上元中，置疏勒都督府，在安西都护府西南二千里
焉耆都督府 本焉耆国。其王姓龙，名突骑支，常役于西突厥。俗有鱼鳖之利。贞观十八年，郭孝恪平之，由是臣属。上元中，置都督府处其部落，无蕃州。在安西都护府东八百里。
西域十六都督州府
龙朔元年，西域诸国，遣使来内属，乃分置十六都督府，州八十，县一百一十，军府一百二十六，皆隶安西都护府，仍于吐火罗国立碑以纪之.
月氏都督府 于吐火罗国所治遏换城置，以其王叶护领之。于其部内分置二十四州，都督统之
太汗都督府 于嚈哒部落所治活路城置，以其王太汗领之。仍分其部置十五州，太汗领
条枝都督府 于诃达罗支国所治伏宝瑟颠城置，以其王领之。仍于其部分置八州
大马都督府 于解苏国所治数瞒城置，以其王领之。仍分其部置三州
高附都督府 于骨咄施国所治妖沙城置，以其王领之。仍分其部置三州
修鲜都督府 于罽宾国所治遏纥城置，以其王领之。仍分其部置十一州
写凤都督府 于失苑延国所治伏戾城置，以其王领之。仍分其部置四州
悦般都督府 于石汗那国所治艳城置，以其王领之。仍分其部置双縻州
奇沙州 于护特健国所治遏密城置，仍分其部置沛薄、大秦二州
和默州 于怛没国所治怛城置，仍分置栗弋州
挔扌敖州 于乌拉喝国所治摩竭城置
昆墟州 于护密多国所治抵宝那城置
至秬州 于俱密国所治措瑟城置
鸟飞州 于护密多国所治摸廷城置
王庭州 于久越得犍国所治步师城置
波斯都督府 于波斯国所治陵城置。(Persia protectorate)
右西域诸国，分置羁縻州军府，皆属安西都护统摄。自天宝十四载已前，朝贡不绝。今于安西府事末纪之，以表太平之盛业也。l
うるさい
*PEACE FOR EAST ASIA*
*I HOPE WE ARE BROTHERS*
🇰🇷 🇯🇵 🇨🇳PEACE FOR FUTURE
yA yee wheres Vietnam? they are one of Sinophere too
No way Chinese Always think so selfish that’s why We can’t combine Okay?
@@youngcreaterfoever9747 Agree with that.
@@youngcreaterfoever9747 it is Chinese gvt, especially ccp, not we CHinese people.....
Only 🇨🇳 🇻🇳🇯🇵🇰🇷 all the same
제 영상에서 수정하고 싶었던 부분들까지 이 영상에 있는 것을 보고 좋았습니다. 아무래도 님의 영상도, 저의 영상도한반도 부분이 비교적 세밀하게 나오고 그 외 지역은 상세하지 못 한 것이 한계인 듯 합니다 ^^;;궁금한 부분이 있는데 1880년경 조선이 청나라 색깔로 표시되는 것은 어째서 인가요?청나라의 간섭 때문인가요? 결국 청일전쟁이 조선에 벌어질 정도로 두 나라 사이에서 고전했다고는 하지만엄연히 독립된 국가였는데 말이죠.
일단 1882년의 조약에서는 조선이 청의 속국이라고 표기되었고, 문서상에서만 그런 게 아니라 실실적으로도 위안스카이가 조선 정부에 들어오는 등 간섭이 심했기 때문에 1880년대 만이라도 그렇게 표기한 것입니다.
+The Dragon Historian 임오군란 때 파병의 댓가로 맺은 조약의 내용은 상행위와 관련된 내용이었습니다. 속국이라는 표현 하나로 조선이 청나라의 영토가 되는것은 아니죠. 조선은 청나라와의 불평등조약 이후 다른 서양 제국주의 열강들과도 조약들을 맺습니다. 독자적인 외교권이 있었죠. 또한, 청나라는 조선에 대한 간섭으로 우위를 보이려 했지만 일본을 필두로 러시아, 미국, 영국 등 다른나라들이 인정하지 않았습니다. 조선 내 친청파,친러파,친일파 등의 세력 간 힘겨루기가 있었구요. 단지 조청조약의 한 단어로 조선이 청나라 땅인 것으로 하는 것은 잘못되었습니다. 오히려 그 문구는 조공관계를 가지고 조선 종주권으로 확대해석 주장했던 청나라의 바람이었죠. 조선이 청의 속국이 아니었고 다른 나라들도 조선을 청의 속국으로 여기지않았으니까요.
corea359 이 영상에서 조선이 청의 영토로 표기 된 건 아닙니다. 다만 독자적인 외교권이 있었다는 점은 미처 생각하지 못했네요.
@@TheDragonHistorian 만약에 조선이 청의 속국이었다면 국기를 정할때 청의 조언대로 청나라의 국기와 똑같이 정하고 색만 다르게 함으로써 청의 속국이었음을 드러내지 않았을까요? 하지만 고종은 청의 마젠창의 제안을 거절하고 조선만의 독자적인 국기를 정했습니다. 이것만으로도 조선은 독립국가였다는 증거가 될 수 있고요 또 당시에 조선은 관세의 개념조차 없었을정도로 국제사회의 인식이 희박했습니다. 서구열강과의 조약중 하나에서 청나라가 원하는대로 속국표시를 했다고 속국으로 취급되는것은 이상하다고 생각합니다. 그리고 민비정권의 가장 큰 뒷배가 청나라였고 임오군란에서도 국왕이 위기를 느끼고 청나라에 도움을 요청한 것이지 그걸로 속국이라고 취급할 수 없다고 생각합니다.
@@msmmoa8935 청나라의 의도를 보면 알 수 있죠. 당시 19세기 청나라는 서구 국가들한테 뒤져라 처맞던 상태여서 자신들의 영토를 뺏기지 않기 위해 전까지는 그냥 자기들 영토에서 살게 냅뒀던 위구르지역도 신장이라는 이름을 대며 속국화 시켰습니다. 조선도 이와 다를바 없어요.
Some missing pieces...Indo-europan Yuezhi/Tocharians in early history and the Qiang and Tubo(early Tibetan) people who were major players at different periods in history. The areas in modern day Qinghai and Tibet was not a black hole, there were some powerful kingdoms there throughout history.
You're right, but it appears the video creator left out everything west of China on purpose. As you might notice, the Empire of Tibet is never shown, nor is anything else in the western parts of the map. These regions are only included when East Asian powers conquer them.
With the amount of detail he put into making this video, it's evident that this is not a mistake, but rather a choice of preference to only include East Asian history (although whether or not Tibet and the Tarim Basin are/aren't East Asia is debatable).
1760 Qing's map so beautiful
some mistake：
1 Dong ou what appear in 190 BCE in this ，it was established by Yue as their fedual subject in 472 BCE ，after Yue annex Wu，they had too many land ，so Yue‘s king establish the subject manage south land. but Dong ou was survived after Chu annex Yue until Han combine their in 138 BCE.
2 when the Ming rise , he met Chen Youliang ， Zhang Shicheng and another enemy clique，but they haven't appear in the time.
This video is extremely wrong and heavily biased.
1- Rouran, Tuyuhun and Xianbei are Para-Mongolic peoples not Mongolic or Proto-Mongolic. Mongolic peoples found 0 state before Genghis Khan.
2-Tuoba was mix of Turkic and Para-Mongolic NOT Mongolic.
3- You counted Xiongnu as Turkic and Mongolic (by this logic Rouran and Tuyuhun are Turco-Mongolic too)😅😅 But Mongolic peoples didn’t even exist in that time according to expert scholars.
Pls make new video and add Para-Mongolic
Liao and Qara Khitai were Para Mongolic too
Naimans = Sekiz Oghuz Turks
Keraits = another Mongolized Turkic tribe
Three Merkits = Three Kurykans
Ancient Tatars = Turkic and Para-Mongolic peoples nothing Mongolic about them
딱 적당한 지도 같구만 왜 몇몇 한국사람들이 더 난리인지 모르겠네...댓글 쭉 보다보니 그냥 땍땍거리면서 중국인 타령하는 애도 있고..난 오히려 조선이 청의 속국으로 표현되지 않은 것에서 한국사람이 더 좋아해야 할 지도가 아닌가 싶은데? 한국계 국가들도 잘 분류되어 있고.
공감
그 해외 어디인지 궁금하네 코리아 아웃이라고? 들어본 적도 없다
본인이 해외 못가보셔서 모르지 인종차별 당해보세요 한국인들대상으로 욕하는 나라 한둘아니에요 괜히 일본보다 낫지라 생각하면 큰 오산이라 생각드는데요? 아직도 코리아라하면 후진국 아니면 중국 속국이라 생각해서 개깔봐요 특히 남미국가쪽이나 유럽권이든지요 유적지 낙서같은거나 호텔에서 민폐끼치고 하는거때매 이미지 않좋아요
저 영국 삽니다........ 의심가시면 IP추적해보세요.. 일본과 비교한 일도 없고요 막상 한국 토픽으로 대화해보면 그들은 선진국이러고 인식하고 있었는데, 시스템적으로 너무 후져서 충격 받는 일이 다반사입니다. 해외 안가보다니 웃기네요. 그 쪽에서 표현하신 유럽권에서 거주한 지 벌써 10년도 넘었습니다. 개인 의견을 외국인들이 대개 그렇게 인식하는듯 싸질러놓으신게 본인의 무지함을 표현하는 방법이신가본데 그저 우습기만 합니다
ㅋㅋ 조공관계한다고 속국처리되면 당나라는 돌궐속국에 5호16국 분열시기에 남북조에조공한 우리백제고구려는 중국의속국에 무로마치는 명의속국임?ㅋㅋ 그런걸로치면 여진도 초창기에 우리나라에 조공했으니 우리나라속국이네 ㅇㅈ? 조공관계뜻도모르고 속국드립치고있는분들은 제에발 무식한거 티내지좀마세요 ㅜㅜ
Yamato seems chilling there
What all music is called?
Why didn't you put Tibet in the map? I think that Tibet is closer to East asia rather than any other region. However nice video!
Usually, the East Asian culture sphere involves the people mentioned in this video. Sure, Tibetans are distantly related to Sinitic, same as Burmese, but they are usually only seen as tangentially part of it
@@NIDELLANEUM yes. But the other hand Tibet is culturally and, most importantly, ethnically/genetically close to Eastern Asia rather than India or Turkic countries. But yeah the cool thing about us is that we made our own and singular culture, independent from others.
5:23 고려하고 송 이걸 버티고있네
왜 하필 언급한 부분 시간이..
ㄷㄷㄷㄷㄷ
@@carpy_1 알필요 없음 그냥 ㅄ 이러고 넘기면됨
Xiongnu is Turkic:
.
The predecessors of Huihe were Xiongnu. Because, customarily, they ride high-wheeled carts. They were also called Gaoche during the Yuan Wei times, or also called Chile, mistakenly rendered as Tiele.
- Xin Tangshu, 232
Weishu, vol. 103 txt: "高車，[...] 其語略與匈奴同而時有小異，或云其先匈奴之甥也", tr: "The Gaoju, [...] their language and the Xiongnu's are similar though differ a little; or to say it differently, they are the sororal nephews/sons-in-laws of the Xiongnu”
According to the Book of Wei, the Yuebans' language and customs were the same as the Gaoche, who were Turkic speakers. Yuebans(Weak Xiongnu) cut their hair and trimmed their ghee-smeared, sun-dried, glossy eyebrows evenly, and washed before meals three times everyday.
Weishu, Vol. 102 "其風俗言語與高車同，而其人清潔於胡。俗剪髮齊眉，以醍醐塗之，昱昱然光澤，日三澡漱，然後飲食。"
Chinese sources link the Tiele people and Ashina to the Xiongnu, According to the Book of Zhou and the History of the Northern Dynasties, the Ashina clan was a component of the Xiongnu confederation.
Linghu Defen et al., Book of Zhou, Vol. 50. (in Chinese)
Li Yanshou (李延寿), History of the Northern Dynasties, Vol. 99. (in Chinese)
Uyghur Khagans claimed descent from the Xiongnu (according to Chinese history Weishu, the founder of the Uyghur Khaganate was descended from a Xiongnu ruler).
The Gaoche are probably remnants of the ancient Red Di. Initially they had been called Dili. Northerners take them as Chile. Chinese take them as Gaoche Dingling. Their language, in brief, and Xiongnu [language] are the same yet occasionally there are small differences. Or one may say that they [Gaoche] are the junior relatives[18] of the Xiongnu in former times.
The Gaoche migrate in search of grass and water. They dress in skins and eat meat. Their cattle and sheep are just like those of the Rouran, but the wheel of their carts are high and have very many spokes.
- Weishu, 103
The forebears of the Tiele belonged to those Xiongnu descendants, having the largest divisions of tribes. They occupied the valleys, and were scattered across the vast region west of the Western Sea [Black Sea]
At the area north of the Duluo River, are the Bugu (僕骨), Tongluo (同羅), Weihe (韋紇),[17] Bayegu (拔也古), Fuluo (覆羅), which were all called Sijin (Irkin). Other tribes such as Mengchen (蒙陳), Turuhe (吐如紇), Sijie (斯結),[a] Hun (渾), Hu (斛), Xue (薛) (or Huxue) and so forth, also dwelled in this area. They had a 20,000 strong invincible army.
[...]
The names of these tribes differ, but all of them can be classified as Tiele. The Tiele do not have a master, but are subjected to the both Eastern and Western Tujue (Göktürks) respectively. They don't have a permanent residence, and move with the changes of grass and water. - Suishu, 84
yeah, Turkic's homeland is in China
Chinese kept most of Turkic DNA and history records, we North-Chinese is the biggest Turkic race in the world !
@@TK-my7jg What?
@@suleimanthemagnificent1494 I'm Chinerse and I am Turkic , I test my DNA and I am a pure Turkic
Why did you totally ignore Tibet? It's part of the East Asian cultural area
because he is noob
+Emerald Warrior of course are you fucking china ?
+Emerald Warrior you said fuck you ?! is it not rude?!
Victorbrine fuck you，i am only rude to rude ones. Next one please comment after me.
北洋提督 我在学的说话方式而已，保持队形继续👿
I think Nanzhao and Dali in modern-day Yunnan should also be listed as Sinitic.
毕竟被彻底汉化了，人口民族和文字语言都是华夏的
是啊，现在越来越多人认为白语属于汉语支系，而且白语和贵州的蔡龙语一起组成汉语里最先分化出来的白蔡语支（macro-Bai）
Khitan and Jurchen Jin were not sinitic, but they adopted lots of Chinese traditons.
Please do one for Europe and the Middle East.