It’s so awesome to go on TH-cam and find exactly what I was looking for: A direct comparison of all Sith Infiltrators that were released so far. Thank you so much for making this video and congratulations to 1 Million subscribers, JANG!
For a while I never thought the light blueish gray pieces looked.. well light blueish gray.. until I paid close attention in the video with the contrast of the background.. wow! You can see that little mix of blue in that gray. It’s amazing. I’m amazed even with seeing these colors literally on the daily.
Charles Bricks Hate the fact that so many Sith Infiltrators were made. It's not memorable in any way. It also took slots away from a new TIE Bomber, TIE Interceptor, Clone Wars sets, and more.
Great video! The 1999 Sith Infiltrator looks like a CIS star-fighter with all those weird blocky blue pieces. But inflation aside, both 1999 and 2007 ones were 29.99 USD, which a 60 dollar difference comparing to 2015's 90 USD Infiltrator. A ship that was seen in only a few scenes in the entire Star Wars movie saga. Please make an AT-AT comparison!
Unfortunately he doesn't own all the AT-ATs, at least I don't think he's reviewed every one. If you're still interested in comparison photos, check out the review for the 2014 AT-AT over at Brickset. They compare all 4 versions, and the surprising thing is, they are all almost the same size.
Thanks for commenting on price. I know you'll have detractors for not including prices in other countries but that info really helped me decide to get the 2015 version.
It's videos like these that make me realize something - building bricks are one of the few industries that are 99% consistent improvement over-time, in all areas. I mean, look at Megabloks! Their Halo line had a couple of decent molds in 2009, sub-par plastic, and all. Now, they've got even better, more-accurate molds, extremely customizable figures, and have completely done away with stickers, now having printed pieces only.
It's too bad Lego still uses stickers. :( So many sets would be improved then. At least they do do important printed pieces, such as the Mystery Machines hub caps and the Benny's spaceship classic space logos. I do wonder how much more they'd cost however.
+Jacob Klinkenberg They do have a lot of printed pieces, I just guess they don't necessarily want to print every little detail because that'd add even more to the cost.
Artemiy Solopov That's exactly the point, I wonder how much more Lego would cost if everything was printed. We can look at this year's TIE Fighter, it has 517 pieces, 3 large and new printed pieces, and only 4 stickers. Many people regard the set as $10 overpriced, yet would the subtraction of these prints make it a $60 set, hypothetically anyway? That is what I'm not sure about, I'm sure it would be more expensive, but then again I'm not sure if general audiences would want to pay more than they should, where most sales of lego comes from, casual buyers.
Rhas 'Churol I wish Lego would do that, but in some ways they are still playing it safe after the 90's bankruptcy thing. I mean they were 880 million in debt, in 2013 they are 880 million in profits, I think printed parts would make Lego more timeless, or research into making Minifigure prints more durable, don't get me wrong. They definitely improved figure printing (detail and quality) but there's always room for Improvement, hence the tri-molded legs or arm printing
Still waiting on a J-Type 327 Nubian Royal Starship, you know the ship that was featured way more than the Sith Infiltrator. And yes LEGO, you can still include Darth Maul.
I wonder what the 2015 Infiltrator would look like with the '07 winglets... I loved my '99 Infiltrator, but compared to the 2011 and 2015 versions you can see how far LEGO has come.
You just can't force something to be iconic, it is fine you like it, and don't get me wrong it's a good looking ship, however it has 2 minutes tops of screentime and it's fanbase isn't that big. Only iconic and popular ships/crafts/places get the UCS treatment. People are already complaining about a fourth sith infiltrator when some other more popular ships only got one or none set iterations to date.
The 2015 version has been getting so much hate for its price and similarity to the 2011 version (at a glance.) But that's not the whole picture at all, so thank you for the video Jang. I own the 2015 version and it was well worth it for me!
Wouldn't it make more sense to calculate the price per weight instead of price per part? It's pretty obvious Lego using more smaller pieces than they need to so people think they're getting a better value when they look at the part count on the box.
+Scott Baker I guarantee 100% no designer at LEGO adds more smaller parts with the intent of deceiving customers. That goes very strongly against many of the company's core values. Build the sets and you'll see exactly why each piece is used.
+JANGBRiCKS I agree with Jang that its probably not done to deceive customer. Unless the production cost of each piece is known going with the weight would probably be more accurate to estimate value.
+Scott Baker This is something I have tried to suggest to Jang and to The Brick Show. You're completely right though. Lego could just add another 2 1x2 bricks instead of 1 2x2.
+Scott Baker i agree on scott's opinion... comparing price with their respective weight is the right way to measure the value of the sets... if using the number pf pieces per cost then that case buying a duplo set is expensive, you get what 8 duplo pieces at the cost of maybe 8$ (example).... just saying y opinion though...
+Amirul Izzat The problem with weight is that smaller pieces weigh more for the space they take up. A 1x1 brick weighs much less than the equivalent three 1x1 plates. More substantially, one 6x5x1 panel makes a very significantly larger element (potentially contributing to greater value) than the same weight worth of 1x1 plates. To put that into a more real perspective, a modern castle built with panels would be very significantly larger (and more valuable to many current, non-nostalgic customers) than a 1970s classic one built with the same weight of basic bricks & plates. Both weight & parts count have significant limitations as value metrics.
I remember buying the 1999 version back when I was 11 years old. Cost $80 aus of my hard earned pocket money. Pieces and instructions probably lost and mixed up at my older brothers place for my nephew to play with.
Great video, brings back a lot of memories of looking at the 1999 model when I was a kid. Although the 2015 one is a bit pricey, your video convinced me that it was worth it - great analysis :)
I prefer smaller cheaper sets that give look for the desired craft. The 2007 (I regret not getting) is my favorite. It looks like the ship and was cheap. I mean, the new one isn't to scale anyway, so why does it matter? Also, for a single seat craft ( at least in the set), it makes ships that are supposed to be large (ex: Star Destroyer) a little wonky looking when put next to each other. Just my opinion.
great review! I wish you would do comparisons like this all the time! (millenium falcon, x wings, TIE fighters, Naboo fighters, Clone "chopper", etc... )
I think the 2015 one is a little overpriced, I think the 2007 one is to small. With what they had in 1999 i think they did a good job. My favorite is 2011.
All things considered, the major difference between the 2011 & 2015 version, other than the style of building techniques chosen (such as slopes vs plates with hinges) are the bulked up back section and underbelly. Which is probably why a lot of people seem to dislike the new set, even though the set is larger, it's larger in less obvious ways. Leading to a knee-jerk reaction regarding the hiked price. With most LEGO remakes, the newest is usually the best, and I don't think this is an exception to that trend.
I think they should have kept the 2007 versions wings on the 2011 and 2015 versions, their default wings are too tiny, and the 2007’s wings look pretty nice when folded out
Great comparison Jang. I have zero interest in the Sith Infiltrator as far as Star Wars vehicles go but I found this video both informative and entertaining. There has been a lot said online regarding the price of the 2015 version but your analysis puts it into perspective.
The hype I felt when star wars lego came along in 1999. Not only the new movie, also lego on top of that. My star wars fandom peaked then. And the movie was alright for an 12 year old me. Now, not so much. Just for nostalgia feelings. I had the old Sith infiltrator. I loved it. But I did not like that Darth Maul sat on the speeder inside of the aircraft. I wanted those separated. But other then that I was stocked. thx for the upload!
I've been waiting for this video for so long! Highly anticipated :) Great comparison though. The 2007 set looks like such a baby! I only own the 1999 version, but I'd say my favorite is maybe a split between the 2007 and 2015 versions. The 2007 set is a bit too small for my liking, and I'm not really a fan of the way they did the "nose" of the ship, but the wings have the most accurate curve. The 2015 set may not have the best looking wings, but the size of it is what I love most. Either way, I want to own them all >:D I was surprised you didn't do a minifig, probe droid, and speeder comparison as well! I know the speeders have changed drastically over the years. Woulda been nice to see that as well :) I hope to see more comparison videos in the future! I am obsessed with owning and displaying all the versions of each Star Wars LEGO ship from across the years, so I love watching these sort of videos.
You should've compared the sith speeder bikes too, that would have been cool. So fsr I think this video is my fav starwars one you've done thus far! : )
Hey Jang, two things. Great comparison of the sets, loved the 2007 one as a kid. I have a suggestion for when you look into some older sets, if you go into megablock's older sets, there's a pirates theme. No, not the Pirates of the Caribbean one. Even though it was in that period of time the bricks weren't that great, the sets held together quite well.
This is a really cool review, thx alot! Actually ALL of the Sith Infiltrator sets do have proportion issues. Based on drawings, which i presume to represent most exactly the actual proportions of the models used in the movies, the original length to width ratio of the Sith Infiltrator is roughly 1,4. (1999: 1,8 2007: 1,5 2011: 1,7 2015: 1,3) It seems like designers tried to mend this several times but always went a bit too far.
If I really wanted a Sith Infiltrator (thankfully I don't), and they were all still on the market at Jang's inflation-adjusted prices, I'd go for the 2007. It's definitely small, but it looks ok and plays well.
I like the 2007 one as well, I have parts to it but not the whole build. My favorite though would be the newest one since it is the best result of a mix of the 2011 and 2007, I just don't care for the price of it.
+Masterbuilder productions Me neither; I sure do like the look of the brand new one, and I'd like to have that crazy Maul face, but at 90 dollars I'm simply not interested.
I bought 3 of the 2007 Sixth Infiltrator ship back then. I put one together as a model, the second for parts & the third I was going to keep put up mint in box till I moved out of my apartment. I really liked the curvature of the foldable wings on it, too bad Lego went back the the flat design.
I can't believe how basic and blocky the original Star Wars Lego is. I used to have almost all the sets upto around 2015. the last few years I have only bought certain sets now and again. I often wondered why did they redo sets of things they had already done before. Now I can see why.
Thanks for this. I already own the 2011 version but was considering the new one, but after seeing how much more accurate the 2011 version is, and the fact I already have it, plus it has better minifigures I'll stick with it instead. The new one is pretty good though.
How come we have gotten four sith infiltrators but only ONE Jango fett's slave 1? The slave 1 got more action than the infiltrator ever got but despite that Lego haven't made a new one! Weird..
It’s so awesome to go on TH-cam and find exactly what I was looking for: A direct comparison of all Sith Infiltrators that were released so far. Thank you so much for making this video and congratulations to 1 Million subscribers, JANG!
1999 sith infiltrator looks so vintage
thats cuz it is my dodge
Banana oh my god yes
For a while I never thought the light blueish gray pieces looked.. well light blueish gray.. until I paid close attention in the video with the contrast of the background.. wow! You can see that little mix of blue in that gray. It’s amazing. I’m amazed even with seeing these colors literally on the daily.
This is a perfect example of lego's evolution over time and experience
I have the 2007 model, didn't realise how small it is!!! Great video, loving all your work!! :)
I don't like the fact that there are more Sith Infiltrators than minifig-scale Imperial TIE fighters :(
Uggggh you're right!
Charles Bricks Hate the fact that so many Sith Infiltrators were made. It's not memorable in any way. It also took slots away from a new TIE Bomber, TIE Interceptor, Clone Wars sets, and more.
JANGBRiCKS do you feel that the 2007 version almost look likes crocledial from the front
Charles Bricks children like designs like this
its in 1 scene i dont know why they made so many
Great video! The 1999 Sith Infiltrator looks like a CIS star-fighter with all those weird blocky blue pieces. But inflation aside, both 1999 and 2007 ones were 29.99 USD, which a 60 dollar difference comparing to 2015's 90 USD Infiltrator. A ship that was seen in only a few scenes in the entire Star Wars movie saga. Please make an AT-AT comparison!
Unfortunately he doesn't own all the AT-ATs, at least I don't think he's reviewed every one.
If you're still interested in comparison photos, check out the review for the 2014 AT-AT over at Brickset. They compare all 4 versions, and the surprising thing is, they are all almost the same size.
I love your comparisons. Do more please.
The best one is yet to come...
the micro fighter...
Those blue pieces on the 1999 one though... so out of place... oh silly LEGO
stef100111 At least they are not bright green, that would be even worse.
It looks like a residence star ship
The 1999 version uses the same legs as the 1980s retro Lego spaceships.
Mind blown.
Back then if u don't have a color JUST PUT BLUE!
Thanks for commenting on price. I know you'll have detractors for not including prices in other countries but that info really helped me decide to get the 2015 version.
It's videos like these that make me realize something - building bricks are one of the few industries that are 99% consistent improvement over-time, in all areas.
I mean, look at Megabloks! Their Halo line had a couple of decent molds in 2009, sub-par plastic, and all.
Now, they've got even better, more-accurate molds, extremely customizable figures, and have completely done away with stickers, now having printed pieces only.
It's too bad Lego still uses stickers. :( So many sets would be improved then.
At least they do do important printed pieces, such as the Mystery Machines hub caps and the Benny's spaceship classic space logos. I do wonder how much more they'd cost however.
+Jacob Klinkenberg They do have a lot of printed pieces, I just guess they don't necessarily want to print every little detail because that'd add even more to the cost.
Artemiy Solopov That's exactly the point, I wonder how much more Lego would cost if everything was printed. We can look at this year's TIE Fighter, it has 517 pieces, 3 large and new printed pieces, and only 4 stickers. Many people regard the set as $10 overpriced, yet would the subtraction of these prints make it a $60 set, hypothetically anyway? That is what I'm not sure about, I'm sure it would be more expensive, but then again I'm not sure if general audiences would want to pay more than they should, where most sales of lego comes from, casual buyers.
Rhas 'Churol I wish Lego would do that, but in some ways they are still playing it safe after the 90's bankruptcy thing. I mean they were 880 million in debt, in 2013 they are 880 million in profits, I think printed parts would make Lego more timeless, or research into making Minifigure prints more durable, don't get me wrong. They definitely improved figure printing (detail and quality) but there's always room for Improvement, hence the tri-molded legs or arm printing
The stickers are BOOOOORIIIIIING
I like the 2015 and 2007
2007 look good
Yeah it look good to
+Dragan Tesic yeah
2007 looks the best in my opinion.
Robert Tran ...
Tru but too small
Still waiting on a J-Type 327 Nubian Royal Starship, you know the ship that was featured way more than the Sith Infiltrator. And yes LEGO, you can still include Darth Maul.
2011 was the best I had hours of fun playing with it best birthday present ever
Same 😌
I love how you put the prices adjusted for inflation.
I wonder what the 2015 Infiltrator would look like with the '07 winglets...
I loved my '99 Infiltrator, but compared to the 2011 and 2015 versions you can see how far LEGO has come.
They should make a UCS Sith Infiltrator
+Jesse Horn not that iconic to give it the UCS treatment
Tony Moreno
Well maybe they should make it Iconic
You just can't force something to be iconic, it is fine you like it, and don't get me wrong it's a good looking ship, however it has 2 minutes tops of screentime and it's fanbase isn't that big. Only iconic and popular ships/crafts/places get the UCS treatment. People are already complaining about a fourth sith infiltrator when some other more popular ships only got one or none set iterations to date.
I would buy that if it was minifig scale.
The 2015 version has been getting so much hate for its price and similarity to the 2011 version (at a glance.) But that's not the whole picture at all, so thank you for the video Jang. I own the 2015 version and it was well worth it for me!
for some reason the 2007 one is my favorite, maybe it's how compact and small it is, or nostalgia. I dunno XD
AJF Studios it also the best in my opinion
Wouldn't it make more sense to calculate the price per weight instead of price per part? It's pretty obvious Lego using more smaller pieces than they need to so people think they're getting a better value when they look at the part count on the box.
+Scott Baker I guarantee 100% no designer at LEGO adds more smaller parts with the intent of deceiving customers. That goes very strongly against many of the company's core values. Build the sets and you'll see exactly why each piece is used.
+JANGBRiCKS I agree with Jang that its probably not done to deceive customer. Unless the production cost of each piece is known going with the weight would probably be more accurate to estimate value.
+Scott Baker This is something I have tried to suggest to Jang and to The Brick Show. You're completely right though. Lego could just add another 2 1x2 bricks instead of 1 2x2.
+Scott Baker i agree on scott's opinion... comparing price with their respective weight is the right way to measure the value of the sets... if using the number pf pieces per cost then that case buying a duplo set is expensive, you get what 8 duplo pieces at the cost of maybe 8$ (example).... just saying y opinion though...
+Amirul Izzat The problem with weight is that smaller pieces weigh more for the space they take up. A 1x1 brick weighs much less than the equivalent three 1x1 plates. More substantially, one 6x5x1 panel makes a very significantly larger element (potentially contributing to greater value) than the same weight worth of 1x1 plates. To put that into a more real perspective, a modern castle built with panels would be very significantly larger (and more valuable to many current, non-nostalgic customers) than a 1970s classic one built with the same weight of basic bricks & plates. Both weight & parts count have significant limitations as value metrics.
Very cool! I like how you did the review and how you had a price value adjusted for time and piece count to be able to quickly compare the LEGO sets!
no comparisons of the speeders or probes?
Or the Maul figures?
Just a suggestion, you could look up pics of the Maul figures over at Brickapedia, if you're still interested in those.
my favorite was the 2007 one its just so sleek and i love it
I really liked the winglets for the 2007 one
I love the 2015 one the best! But I have nostalgia for 2007 though, I used to have that set!
of course the 2015 one is the best one in my opinion!
I remember buying the 1999 version back when I was 11 years old. Cost $80 aus of my hard earned pocket money. Pieces and instructions probably lost and mixed up at my older brothers place for my nephew to play with.
Great and interesting analysis of build evolution! Wish you'd do more big comparisons like this!
Great video, brings back a lot of memories of looking at the 1999 model when I was a kid.
Although the 2015 one is a bit pricey, your video convinced me that it was worth it - great analysis :)
The 2011 version is the best with the perfect size and width
Vsauce Puppet And price. $90 for something that only had seconds of screentime?!
Great comparison, Jang! My favorite has to be from 2013.
I meant 2011 XD
lego evolves over time
3:26 the cockpit looks like a fat hamster can never un see
You should make an AT-AT comparison
I love the 2006 version. I'm glad i got it when I was a kid. It looks so sleek!
You are wrong it came out in 2007 not 2006
Great to see these all together! :)
Waiting for the 2019 version
Wow! Nice comparison! Thanks!
Not the biggest Star Wars fan, but I'm seriously considering buying the 2015 version just cause it looks so massive and cool looking.
I prefer smaller cheaper sets that give look for the desired craft. The 2007 (I regret not getting) is my favorite. It looks like the ship and was cheap. I mean, the new one isn't to scale anyway, so why does it matter? Also, for a single seat craft ( at least in the set), it makes ships that are supposed to be large (ex: Star Destroyer) a little wonky looking when put next to each other. Just my opinion.
My favourite is the 2007 model it is the best design
great review! I wish you would do comparisons like this all the time! (millenium falcon, x wings, TIE fighters, Naboo fighters, Clone "chopper", etc... )
Odd how i kinda miss the old uber blocky look from 99. The history of this obscure ship is excellent for all of Lego.
I own the 2007 version and I even didn't knew that it was so small😊
Man, I've been anticipating this for some time!
What are your thoughts on them? :)
I think the 2015 one is a little overpriced, I think the 2007 one is to small. With what they had in 1999 i think they did a good job. My favorite is 2011.
2007th i like the best.
Ryan Martin Baumann cunfirmet m8
That 2007 version is my favorite!
next up, all the snow speeders lego has made. lol
2011 is a nice mix of old and new. I don't own any of these but I'd say its probably my favorite 1 here.
My favorite is the 2011 one
Love the comparrison, i always wondered why Lego was comming up with the "same" models. But seeing the huge difference ist stuninng. Nice Video ;)
2015 and 1999 are the same distance (in years) from 2007
the 2007 version was one of my first legos :o
All things considered, the major difference between the 2011 & 2015 version, other than the style of building techniques chosen (such as slopes vs plates with hinges) are the bulked up back section and underbelly. Which is probably why a lot of people seem to dislike the new set, even though the set is larger, it's larger in less obvious ways. Leading to a knee-jerk reaction regarding the hiked price.
With most LEGO remakes, the newest is usually the best, and I don't think this is an exception to that trend.
+JANGBRiCKS Awesome I've been waiting for this vid for a long time (Great Comparison)
Thank u for the rewiews rly helps me out.
the oldest one looks so weird
I had the 2007 one! The Maul figure I got with it is still one of my most prized minifigures!
I feel like the 2015 is a mix of the 2011 and the 2007 ones. 2015 is by far my favorite
I actually don't mind the cost for the 2015 version. It's very nice looking and playable for almost anyone, so I understand the high price range.
I think they should have kept the 2007 versions wings on the 2011 and 2015 versions, their default wings are too tiny, and the 2007’s wings look pretty nice when folded out
Great comparison Jang. I have zero interest in the Sith Infiltrator as far as Star Wars vehicles go but I found this video both informative and entertaining. There has been a lot said online regarding the price of the 2015 version but your analysis puts it into perspective.
The hype I felt when star wars lego came along in 1999. Not only the new movie, also lego on top of that. My star wars fandom peaked then. And the movie was alright for an 12 year old me. Now, not so much. Just for nostalgia feelings. I had the old Sith infiltrator. I loved it. But I did not like that Darth Maul sat on the speeder inside of the aircraft. I wanted those separated. But other then that I was stocked. thx for the upload!
The 2011 is the best
I've been waiting for this video for so long! Highly anticipated :) Great comparison though. The 2007 set looks like such a baby! I only own the 1999 version, but I'd say my favorite is maybe a split between the 2007 and 2015 versions.
The 2007 set is a bit too small for my liking, and I'm not really a fan of the way they did the "nose" of the ship, but the wings have the most accurate curve. The 2015 set may not have the best looking wings, but the size of it is what I love most. Either way, I want to own them all >:D
I was surprised you didn't do a minifig, probe droid, and speeder comparison as well! I know the speeders have changed drastically over the years. Woulda been nice to see that as well :)
I hope to see more comparison videos in the future! I am obsessed with owning and displaying all the versions of each Star Wars LEGO ship from across the years, so I love watching these sort of videos.
the 2007 ship looks like vaders tie fighter with the curved pieces out!!
I had the 1999 version as a kid for Christmas, took me a while to build considering it was only 200 odd pieces
The wings of the 2007 though look more like the movie with the curves than any other.
You should've compared the sith speeder bikes too, that would have been cool. So fsr I think this video is my fav starwars one you've done thus far! : )
I liked the 2007 version
I do think the 2015 one is expensive, but not overpriced. After building it I fell in love with it.
Why haven’t they made like an official darth maul lightsaber mould like in the games
Hey Jang, two things.
Great comparison of the sets, loved the 2007 one as a kid.
I have a suggestion for when you look into some older sets, if you go into megablock's older sets, there's a pirates theme. No, not the Pirates of the Caribbean one. Even though it was in that period of time the bricks weren't that great, the sets held together quite well.
Even though it's small in my opinion the 2007 model looks the best
I feel like a combination of elements from the 2011 & 2015 versions would make the best looking one.
This is a really cool review, thx alot! Actually ALL of the Sith Infiltrator sets do have proportion issues. Based on drawings, which i presume to represent most exactly the actual proportions of the models used in the movies, the original length to width ratio of the Sith Infiltrator is roughly 1,4. (1999: 1,8 2007: 1,5 2011: 1,7 2015: 1,3) It seems like designers tried to mend this several times but always went a bit too far.
You are lucky to own the 1999 ver. I find that it has a certain charm to it! Blockiness be darned!
+Griffiths Bacani I own it as well ^_^ It was one of my first Star Wars LEGO sets!
I love the 2011 version more then any of them! I used to own 1! :D
I only have the 2007 one and I love it.
The newest one is defiantly my favorite
I like the 2011 lego version of this spaceship more than the official design seen in movies :P
you really like your sith infiltrators :)
If I really wanted a Sith Infiltrator (thankfully I don't), and they were all still on the market at Jang's inflation-adjusted prices, I'd go for the 2007. It's definitely small, but it looks ok and plays well.
I like the 2007 one as well, I have parts to it but not the whole build. My favorite though would be the newest one since it is the best result of a mix of the 2011 and 2007, I just don't care for the price of it.
+Masterbuilder productions Me neither; I sure do like the look of the brand new one, and I'd like to have that crazy Maul face, but at 90 dollars I'm simply not interested.
awesome
It would be cool to do this with the X-wings, when the new one becomes available September 4th.
The face of the 2015 Sith infiltrator looks like a grandpa.
My favorite is '07's version.
I Like the 2007 One :)
I like it too. Probably because it's the one I own. XD
Same, xD
+Žerocookiecake [Karnipex] Me too. :-D
+Žerocookiecake [Karnipex] yeah me too
the 2009 set looks very well
I bought 3 of the 2007 Sixth Infiltrator ship back then. I put one together as a model, the second for parts & the third I was going to keep put up mint in box till I moved out of my apartment.
I really liked the curvature of the foldable wings on it, too bad Lego went back the the flat design.
The flat design feels more Original Trilogy empire to me.
i really like the comparison to older models. could you do it with other sets please?
I went to my toy world (Australia) and they had the force awakens sets!
I can't believe how basic and blocky the original Star Wars Lego is. I used to have almost all the sets upto around 2015. the last few years I have only bought certain sets now and again. I often wondered why did they redo sets of things they had already done before. Now I can see why.
Just got the 2015 on sale for 60$ so at that price I think it is GREAT!
Thanks for this. I already own the 2011 version but was considering the new one, but after seeing how much more accurate the 2011 version is, and the fact I already have it, plus it has better minifigures I'll stick with it instead. The new one is pretty good though.
EbTheGuy I don't get why they cut so much on the play value on the last one.
Gotta get the '11 version.
How come we have gotten four sith infiltrators but only ONE Jango fett's slave 1? The slave 1 got more action than the infiltrator ever got but despite that Lego haven't made a new one! Weird..
Simon Bergvall probably because no one likes Jango Fett