Dr Michael Shermer | God does NOT exist
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 ธ.ค. 2012
- Dr Michael Shermer gives his argument against the existence of God.
SUBSCRIBE for more speakers ► is.gd/OxfordUnion
Facebook @ theoxfordunion
Twitter @ / oxfordunion
Oxford Union Website @ www.oxford-union.org/
Dr Michael Shermer begins by saying that 84% of the world's population believe in some kind of organised religion and how do those who believe in a particular religion know that they have chosen the right one and everyone else has got it wrong?
He proceeds to explain two pieces of evidence that proves that humans made up God and religion and not the other way around. He starts with evolutionary theory saying that we are all descendants from cautious creatures who creator false positive rather than false negatives.
The creation of an agency (an omnipotent being) within a religion is a powerful force of social control. Then the second line of evidence is the what ever social environment were born into we would be exposed to the dominant religion in that environment i.e. India -- Hinduism, Europe -- Christianity.
Filmed on Thursday 8th November 2012
ABOUT Dr MICHAEL SHERMER:
Author and Founder of the Skeptics Society.
ABOUT THE OXFORD UNION SOCIETY:
The Union is the world's most prestigious debating society, with an unparalleled reputation for bringing international guests and speakers to Oxford. It has been established for 189 years, aiming to promote debate and discussion not just in Oxford University, but across the globe.
Rights managed by Oxford Media Associates www.oxfordmediaassociates.com/
Filmed by Oxford Media Solutions www.oxfordmediasolutions.co.uk
![[TH] 2024 PMSL SEA W2D4 | Summer | โอกาสสุดท้าย ของสัปดาห์สอง](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/aswciGrYovo/mqdefault.jpg)
![ใจดำกับฉันก่อน - วงทัพห้า [Official MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/I48wa4qurAU/mqdefault.jpg)
The emo kid tossing his hair about deserves his own meme.
***** Well someone's emotional.
+DZStudios1 If the whole universe has no meaning, we should never have been able to find out it has no meaning; it would be as if there was no light in the universe and no humans with eyes to perceive light, we would never know it was dark. Dark would be a word without meaning. If God does not exist in the universe, we should have never been able to know God didn’t exist. It should be as if our brain never had a perceptive thought about God. The word God would be a word without meaning. Respectfully, if God has no existence in the universe how could the brain of an atheist perceive God enough to ever deny God’s existence? If God exists in the universe, we should expect our brains to have perceptive thoughts about God - and we do - even when denying God exists we are expressing a perceptive thought about God that would not exist if atheism were true.
+rontee24 So in your argument anything you can perceive is true or must exist? Try it! I perceive flying purple whales so they must exist. Sure I could draw what I think this may be or look like but it holds no truth to it's existence. Poor argument my friend!!!
Well, when you are done putting words in my mouth that I didn't say, how about writing a counter-argument to prove my statement wrong?
***** Well, when you are done putting words in my mouth that I didn't say, how about writing a counter-argument to prove my statement wrong?
All gods & religions are created by man. And guess what? These gods & religions need your money.
A/JACKSON-----All planets, suns, stars, the universe ARE CREATED BY A. Jackson ! ! !
Albert Jackson True 👍👍
That's patently untrue.
Although religion is made by man, God is not. In fact, God made us, along with everything else in the universe, and He also made the universe.
Spot on. It’s hard to understand why so many people believe there is a god .
@@debunkerofatheism6874 That's what you claim.
Why exactly is your believe in God right and Not the muslims?
Any evidence?
*Believing in Aronra's cult leads to severe rtrdtion. For instance, the 65 year old b-allet dancer A. Eldridge aka "ergonomover"/"docreasonable"/"2ndchookie" insisted that ostriches have no wings and the Italian translation of Saturday is Saturno.*
_The best data we have are exactly what I would have predicted, had I nothing to go on but the five Books of Moses, the Psalms, the Bible as a whole_
*Arno Penzias, Nobel laureate in physics, co-discoverer of the cosmic microwave background*
*Nobel prize winners are very unlikely to be religious*
Atheism correlates with intelligence and education. Even Alfred Nobel himself was an atheist. As usual, religious imbeciles NIL, atheists 1000.
How many of the Nobel prize winners won based on their research into magical bible creationism??? Oh, none?? On the other hand:
*Nobel Prize in Chemistry awarded for using evolution to develop new chemicals*
Scientists Frances Arnold, George Smith and Sir Gregory Winter have won the 2018 Nobel Prize in Chemistry for research using directed evolution to produce enzymes for new chemicals and pharmaceuticals, the award-giving body says.
'This year's Nobel Laureates in chemistry have been inspired by the power of evolution and used the same principles - genetic change and selection - to develop proteins that solve mankind's chemical problems,' the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences said in a statement on awarding the 9 million Swedish crown prize.
I can still remember being a little kid when my parents put me in Sunday school. As they taught us about Jesus and god and religion in general,I thought “what are they trying to tell me here”? I don’t believe any of this”.
I’m so glad my parents allowed me to have an open mind and form my own conclusion rather than brainwash me.
JOHN, WHY USE SUCH VULGAR LANGUAGE?
Augustine Hourigan ya I guess I could have kept it clean but something about religion just angers me. It causes so much trouble around the world
This is true description of a fool. Someone who doesn’t believe something only because they cannot see it. You want to know a secret. God is real because he speaks to us. Speaking to us counts as evidence you think we just talk to our head. No
ForeverEdits. Well your 'It's true for me' fallacy is all you have talked about. You have a personal incredulity fallacy, a special pleading fallacy, an ignorance fallacy and a strawman fallacy which are all contrary to the evidence. You have a fallacious belief system and sound ridiculous to the rest of us that go by the evidence. Yes you are a fool when the natural evidence in reality is against you.
Edit: It appears as if you have changed your name to 'White Wolf' instead. Don't worry because I can still keep track of you even when you do show your dishonesty.
John all you did was publically admit you were born stupid and youre determined to die the same way.
*DNA is the nightmare of Aronra's disciples and the undeniable evidence of an intelligent creator.*
Please tell us how and why.
@@thejils1669 *If u ask this question, it's a waste of time to give u an explanation.*
@biglongfish9253 Oh, OK, that explains it...I got it, thanx...
DNA is one of the strongest point to expose the lies of creation..
6000 years mmmg maybe 4000 to 5000 ago considering the Noah's flood. If all people on earth were related it would show, The DNA of the Bush men in Namibia, is the oldest in the world..
DNA variety refuses the creation lie.
How do you explain a banana having 40% of human DNA
Letuse is more than that
Mushrooms even closer
Of course chimpanzee shares 98%
We didn't evolve from chimps but primates evolved from a common ancestor
@@thejils1669 *I am glad. Only the gullible one believes that nature can create codes, information and laptops.*
*Just beautiful from Yeshua:* _“I am the resurrection and the life. Whoever believes in Me will live, even though he d-ies_
yu7 *Shermer admitting that the theists have strong arguments for the existence of God is much like Dawkins who sold to the rtrds a book called "God delusion" and then he said this :* _a serious case could be made for a deistic god_ *And then, even worse, he said this:* _if you look at the details of biochemistry, molecular biology, you might find a signature of some sort of designer_ 😂😂😂😂😂
And then he explained why that is a wrong impression. What you are doing is called quote mining. Instead of defending your position you prefer to find holes in the arguments of some famous people you do not agree with by putting their quotes out of context.
th-cam.com/video/h8KgLCsMxCc/w-d-xo.htmlsi=UZH2pPYF1F5gT0eB
*Take the 7-8 pieces of the simplest puzzle, bring them wherever you want on this planet, shuffle them and let any natural force act upon them. It will never fit the pieces together, but id-iots are dreaming that it can put together many trillions of dynamic parts, each with its own set of functions, all interconnected.*
gggg *Since the 65 year old b-allet dancer A. Eldridge aka (aka "ergonomover"/"flandiddlyanders"/"docreasonable" said "Ostriches do not have wings ACCORDING TO ENCYCLOPEDIA BRITANNICA" (I captured this sublime moment in my last v1de0), I started to think that he walks only on his fours.....*
frr55 *As I said, believing in Aronra's cult leads to severe rtrdtion. For instance, the 65 year old b-allet dancer A. Eldridge aka "ergonomover"/"docreasonable"/"FlandiddlyandersFRS" insisted that ostriches have no wings and the Italian translation of Saturday is Saturno.*
Come off it Susan, that's ridiculous.
*One can't deny the maker of the watch. And even if he can, that doesn't change reality.*
*Very beautiful and deep one from the great Newton, with much love:* _He must be blind who does not immediately see in the perfect and wise arrangement of beings, the infinite wisdom and goodness of the almighty Creator, and 'idiot' he who does not confess Him_
*Absolutely beautiful and deep one from the great Newton, with much love:* _He must be blind who does not immediately see in the perfect and wise arrangement of beings, the infinite wisdom and goodness of the almighty Creator, and 'idiot' he who does not confess Him_
It could be that Newton was covering his arse. He wasn't a Christian.
*Just beautiful from Yeshua:* _I am the Way, the Truth and the Life_
*From the great Newton, with much love:* _He must be blind who does not immediately see in the perfect and wise arrangement of beings, the infinite wisdom and goodness of the almighty Creator, and 'idiot' he who does not confess Him_
Uh.... pee pee?
*Aronra's disciples are not necessarily notorious for their intelligence. For example, the ballet dancer "ergonomover" (in reality a-ndrew "ergonomover" e-l-dri-dge) told us:*
*he:* _the solar circle is a think tank grunter_
*he, some months later:* _the solar circle (as in the Earth's orbit around the Sun)..._
No one except you said that, liar.
@@FlandiddlyandersFRS *Yeah, we see in my videos that you tell only the truth, poor ballet dancer* 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
*Beautiful from Yeshua:* _I am the Way, the Truth and the Life_
*Nobel Prize in biology this year goes to the b-allet dancer A. Eldridge aka "docreasonable"/"ergonomover""/"flandiddlyandersFRS", who discovered that ostriches have no wings. This wonder of evolution might have been predicted by Darwin at the time when ostriches were having wings.*
*Simply a beautiful one from Newton:* _In want of other proofs, the thumb would convince me of the existence of a God._
If God exists there would be no need for any debates
+Edward Azar >> " _If God exists there would be no need for any debates_ "
I think I am as sane as the next man, not sure about my IQ, reasoning generally come with accumulated knowledge. Is there a point?
+Edward Azar >> " _I think I am as sane as the next man, not sure about my IQ,.... etc._ "
There is no such thing as God. Man created God in his own image and likeness. We all talk about vampires, santa Claus, and many other superstitions that do not exist, all created by human ignorance and fear. Thiest often like to use the question "something from nothing" as their criteria for disproving the scientific expalnation of the universe but it also applies to the creation of GOD himself. Something from nothing is the response of someone who knows nothing about science or the universe and is simple minded. The onus of proof lies with the believer!
Edward Azar. >> " _There is no such thing as God._ "
*Great ! If that IS true, how do you explain your need to deny......something/someone who does not exist ? :-))) Does it makes sense to you ? Can it be that you base your assumption on what you've been "intellectually fed" all your life ? :-))*
*As I read again your post , I noticed that you assess the world from the point of view of "your five senses". Am I correct ? :-))*
*Beautiful one from Yeshua:* _I am the light of the world. Whoever follows me will not walk in darkness, but will have the light of life_
The bible also says you can own slaves and take girls for yourself after battle. Now, tell me about how the bible is the supreme source of morality. XD
*Beautiful and deep one from the great Newton, with much love:* _He must be blind who does not immediately see in the perfect and wise arrangement of beings, the infinite wisdom and goodness of the almighty Creator, and 'idiot' he who does not confess Him_
*One must be incredibly s-tup id to say that codes are random and the Italian translation of Saturday is Saturno. That's the case of the 65-year old ballet dancer Eldridge aka "docwylde".*
He loved us...the world hates him. It was prophesied in the Bible.... “ A FooL says in his heart, there is no God” psalm 14:1
That's a thought.
Francis v yeah ok buddy
@@shawnsiya4132 😁
@@armandoesponda6110 😅
asaa *Another example of inhuman ridiculousness with Eldridge praising himself from his other trolling accounts:* _Mr Ergonomover is a dapper-looking chap, full of personality, wry humour, wit and wisdom - with a million fascinating life stories to tell_ 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
🤭 This fool 👆 is still crying because Aron-Ra, Konstantin and ergonomover humiliated him.
*Beautiful, from Pascal, with love:* _There are only three types of people; those who have found God and serve him; those who have not found God and seek him, and those who live not seeking, or finding him. The first are rational and happy; the second unhappy and rational, and the third foolish and unhappy._
*I really do love math. Because math alone proves God.*
This troll 👆 is obviously misinformed and lying
@@FlandiddlyandersFRS *Only s-at-a-n l-ies more than the ballet dancer Eldridge "PhD"*
@@FlandiddlyandersFRSIt is just one of Joseph's old sock puppet accounts.
@@hammyhog4748 You tell him... 'Hammy'!! 🦮💨 👈🤣🤣🤣🤣
Good dog Hammy!! Goood dog! 😆
@@FlandiddlyandersFRS And regressing as well.
*Beautiful one from Newton, with much love:* _a-theism is so s-enseless and o-dious to mankind_ 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
*Absolutely beautiful one from Newton, with much love:* _a-theism is so s-enseless and o-dious to mankind_ 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
*Beautiful from Nabeel Qureshi:* _I left Islam because I studied Muhammad's life. I accepted the gospel because I studied Jesus's life_
Muslims already believe in Jesus, so that's just a lie.
@@DocReasonable *Ur dense rtrdtion and evilness impede you from understanding this post.*
*From Pascal, with love:* _There are only three types of people; those who have found God and serve him; those who have not found God and seek him, and those who live not seeking, or finding him. The first are rational and happy; the second unhappy and rational, and the third foolish and unhappy._
People like you are exactly why atheists exists. I mean you use outrageously illogical quotes from a extremely outdated book full of contradictions to try and justify you're belief system and to try to shame others for not having the same beliefs as yourself also hypothetically theoretically speaking do you think god can create a rock so heavy that he himself cannot lift it because if so than god is not all-powerful and if not then god is not omnipotent because god cannot create a rock so heavy that he himself cannot lift it their for rendering him impotent
Pascal is wrong. I was much happier when religion and God wasn't thrust in my comments, algorithm and environment all the time. Exponentially happier. Much much happier. Given my brief perusals of the Bible, ire from religious types irl and comments from Bible nuts quoting his wrath and threatening brimfire I'd say among those who've found and serve him exist extremely unhappy souls.
He left out those like Russell, Hitchens, and myself, who would not worship any god ever described, even if proof of Its existence were found.
@@KettlesAdvocate*U mean u practice self-delusion.*
I feel kind of embarrassed for people who still believe God/gods exist.
th-cam.com/video/59mRZ1Vj8ZU/w-d-xo.html
Yeah you will one-day be embarrassed when you meet GOD all will bow before GOD
I feel embarrased for those who believe nothing created something. Simply stupid logic.
@@ryan8040 it depends on what nothing is
It is strange that many people are theists and others atheists . I am impartial , i listen to everybody .
*Beautiful from Yeshua:* _“I am the resurrection and the life. Whoever believes in Me will live, even though he d-ies_
Beautiful words do not support the irrational claim that magic beings exsist.
@@unkaumanguy1439 *Speaking about "rational", u told us that ostriches have no wings, Eldridge.....*
@@biglongfish9253 Log onto another account to jump in and defend yourself. LOL
Now that's just silly, isn't it?
D-ies? You have a stammer?
rrdd *The 65-year-old b-allet dancer A. Eldridge aka "docreasonable"/"ergonomover"/"flandidlyandersFRS"/"cretionists_arecrybabies/"poor_creationists"(and other countless accounts) started to cite ABC News which was talking about psychopaths hiding under internet anonymity. Unfortunately for him, I ruined his anonymity.* 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
dds *I confess I have the same problem as Lord Kelvin who said this:* _The atheistic idea is so n-onsensical that I do not see how I can put it in words._ 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
I actually agree with you for once.
You do have the same _"problem"_ as the greatest scientists throughout history.
*None of them proved Gods exist.*
*Not even one.*
*EVER!*
🤭😁😊 👍👏🤝
*A very beautiful one from Newton:* _In want of other proofs, the thumb would convince me of the existence of a God._
Grow up, rtrd.
*Simply beautiful, from Pascal, with love:* _There are only three types of people; those who have found God and serve him; those who have not found God and seek him, and those who live not seeking, or finding him. The first are rational and happy; the second unhappy and rational, and the third foolish and unhappy._
ftdg *Another beautiful one from the same Einstein:* _Every one who is seriously engaged in the pursuit of science becomes convinced that the laws of nature manifest the existence of a spirit vastly superior to that of men, and one in the face of which we with our modest powers must feel humble._
13:58 best point in the speech. "(Human beings make up stories in order to deal with the pains of life, so they can feel better.)
Honestly...as a medical student,even if it's not God then there is some greater intelligence out there...
I know what I'm saying.
@Don don lol...very funny,do you know how complex the human body is?..
I don't think that's concidence bro🙂
@Don don cool...
How about you drop your FB handle,let's really exchange some ideas...I think that would be nice...what do you think?
@Don don aiit..
It's cool....
Always remember,there won't be an Amazon without Jeff Bezos 🙂
That is the dumbest argument I have ever heard.
*A good example of acute rtrdtion, the b-allet dancer A. Eldridge aka "ergonomover"/"docreasonable"/"flandiddlyandersFRS"/"mtllyderanged"/"creationists-arecrybabies" said this "An entire human digitized genome = 3.436687 Gb. My computer could hold 330 of them" and then "That's an argument for the superi0rity of humans over god". Was he right, because unlike his computer, a human body holds.....30 trillion copies of a genome!!!!!!* 😂😂😂 😂😂😂 😂😂😂
*Simply beautiful and powerful one from James C. Maxwell:* _Science is incompetent to reason upon the creation of matter itself out of nothing. We have reached the utmost limit of our thinking faculties when we have admitted that because matter cannot be eternal and self-existent it must have been created._
Wasn't your god created,,,, or at least dreamed up?
Wasting your time with a real self deluder like this fool.@@Heygoodlooking-lk9kg
*Absolutely beautiful example of acute rtrdtion, quoting the 65 year old b-allet dancer A. Eldridge aka "ergonomover"/"docreasonable"/"flandiddlyandersFRS"/"mtllyderanged"/"creationists-arecrybabies", who was explaining to us evolution:* _Ostriches do not have wings ACCORDING TO ENCYCLOPEDIA BRITANNICA!_
*From Britannica about ostrich:* _The male is mostly black but has white plumes in the wings and tail_
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
God says: we will discuss it in a minute after you die....
Yeah, so absurd. :D
@@hmgrraarrpffrzz9763 God in His Word says yes I exist and I have given you sufficient evidence.
You have rejected Him because you love your sin more than God. And twisted the evidence in light of that.
_"I have given you sufficient evidence"_
I've not once in my entire life heard of evidence supporting the supposed existence of one or more deity. And that is why I don't believe in God. It simply makes no sense. And sinning? If religion would make people stop sinning, why is christians priests raping children a constant subject? And to sin means to violate the will of a deity. Without evidence that a deity exists, there is no evidence that anybody can sin. Or in other words: as an Atheist I can not sin because no deity exists.
@@hmgrraarrpffrzz9763 hey mate :)
Many people demand evidence for God. But God says people already have enough to show He exists. And, the thing is with evidence, it is subject to our interpolation. And how we interpret evidence has nothing to do with the evidence. The way we interpret the evidence is based on our foundational beliefs- the beliefs we bring to the evidence. Therefore all evidence is subject to what we already believe. As a Christian My foundation, ultimate authority, is God. And because in these sort of discussions on worldviews we need to start there - with your foundational beliefs. And whether they can provide a coherent justification for a worldview. So let's start there. As an atheist, what is truth in your worldview? This is am important question because it will show what your ultimate authority is and whether it is justifiable or not.
I don't want the convo to get too convoluted so we can come back to your other points later :)
Hope your having a good day
To Hm Grrr...Then I do hope you do not consider your attacker who stabs you in the back in the street a sinner and expect him to be jailed, but rather help him push the blade deeper inside you as he is also a victim of bad family circumstances....and after your recovery you go and visit him just to be stabbed again...
_You prepare a table before me in the presence of my enemies._
_You anoint my head with oil; my cup overflows._
_Surely your goodness and love will follow me all the days of my life,_
_and I will dwell in the house of YHWH forever._
*Psalm 24*
Facepalm
@@WeanerBeaner69 He never will quite get it.
So what? Who cleaned up the mess from his overflowing cup?
*Just beautiful from Nabeel Qureshi:* _I left Islam because I studied Muhammad's life. I accepted the gospel because I studied Jesus's life_
Facepalm
Beautiful. He's been fooled twice.
@@Aziz_Abdullayev_uz *....said the d-mon.*
@@atheism-themoststupidrelig5703The life of Muhammad is 85% fabricated, while the life of Jesus is 90% so. Now imagine……
@@atheism-themoststupidrelig5703 you stoopid
ghjh *If evolution through natural selection was real, we wouldn't see people with such a high level of rtrdtion like the b-allet dancer A. Eldridge aka "ergonomover"/"docreasonable". Remember he said that ostriches have no wings and the Italian translation of Saturday is Saturno*
“Darwinian theory is the creation myth of our culture. It’s the officially sponsored, government financed creation myth that the public is supposed to believe in, and that creates the evolutionary scientists as the priesthood… So, we have the priesthood of naturalism, which has great cultural authority, and of course has to protect its mystery that gives it that authority-that’s why they’re so vicious towards critics.” - Phillip Johnson
_"Our strategy has been to change the subject so that we can get the issue of intelligent design - which really means the reality of God's creation - before the academic world and into the schools. This isn't really, and never has been a debate about science or the truth. It's about winning at any cost, and affirming the reality of the God of The Christian Bible, by challenging the domination of materialism and naturalism in the academic arena. With the assistance of many friends I have developed a strategy for doing this which we call "The wedge". But remember, we must avoid debating the Bible and the Book of Genesis at all costs because we do not want to raise the obvious Bible-science dichotomy. Our goal is, "how to win". Phrase the __-pseudoscience-__ argument in such a way that you can get it heard in secular academia and in a way that tends to unify __-other science illiterates-__ religious fence-sitters. You must also avoid getting sidetracked onto other issues (like empirical evidence) which __-our intellectual superiors-__ people are always trying to do."_
- Phillip E Johnson - the father of the ID/creation-science movement
Conclusion: Creationists/ID fans are dishonest cowards
*You still can't handle the undeniable fact of intelligent design, poor ballerina.*@@FlandiddlyandersFRS
@@atheism-themoststupidrelig8802 🤭 ID was destroyed 19 years ago, dummy.
😄😆😂🤣
So-called Darwin theory of evolution and another Nonsense so-called big bang theory is 🚫 not Science
Not even close
Not even science fiction
Simply human Fantasy
Blind faith
*Unforgettable one from Newton, with much love:* _a-theism is so s-enseless and o-dious to mankind_ 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
If god really did live on the outskirts of reason and was real, we’d all be screwed. Even the faithful.
Indeed, a lonely sadistic psychopath in the sky is not my idea of fun.
Phil.
@@user-jt8dh4qy8d*The rtrded psychopath think that their creator is that way, Correction: u are Andrew, not Phil.*
@@atheism-themoststupidrelig5703It's either "psychopath thinks" or "psychopaths think" please learn English.
Correction: I am Andrew, user-jt8 is not. Maybe the psychopath you keep projecting is yourself.
*Absolutely beautiful one from Max Planck - founder of modern science, read it carefully:* _As a physicist, that is, a man who had devoted his whole life to a wholly prosaic science, the exploration of matter, no one would surely suspect me of being a fantast. And so, having studied the atom, I am telling you that there is no matter as such! All matter arises and persists only due to a force that causes the atomic particles to vibrate, holding them together in the tiniest of solar systems, the atom._
_Yet in the whole of the universe there is no force that is either intelligent or eternal, and we must therefore assume that behind this force there is a conscious, intelligent Mind or Spirit. This is the very origin of all matter_
*Stop lying, learn English and ffs grow up, fool!*
werw3: *A good example of e-vil rtrdation, the 65 year old b-allet dancer 😂 A. Eldridge aka "FlandiddlyandersPhD"/"docreasonable"/"creationists-arecrybabies"/"mntllyrtrded", who insisted that ostriches have no wings, was laughing that his creator is a "bad" designer, I quote him:* _Only 2% of an organism's DNA even has any function...What sloppy tinkerer would design junk ?_
*He later on, suddenly increasing his initial prediction from 2%: to 32% 😂:* _The Yale School of Medicine says "68% of human DNA is functionless junk_
*Quoting Yale School of Medicine:* _Yale scientists played a leading role in an international effort to map the 99 percent of the human genome that doesn’t produce proteins-perhaps ending the notion that those regions are “junk.”_
*Simply beautiful from Anro Penzias, Nobel laureate in physics, co-discoverer of the cosmic microwave background:*
_The best data we have are exactly what I would have predicted, had I nothing to go on but the five Books of Moses, the Psalms, the Bible as a whole_
frff *Shermer admitting that the theists have strong arguments for the existence of God is much like Dawkins who sold to the rtrds a book called "God delusion" and then he said this :* _a serious case could be made for a deistic god_ *And then, even worse, he said this:* _if you look at the details of biochemistry, molecular biology, you might find a signature of some sort of designer_ 😂😂😂😂😂
th-cam.com/video/ChTYOtVBws4/w-d-xo.htmlsi=qiPBHgswEI2zBsfC
How Allah asnwet theses atheist in Quran
th-cam.com/video/h8KgLCsMxCc/w-d-xo.htmlsi=UZH2pPYF1F5gT0eB
@@MamaMama-sv3b *Don't bet on that.*
*One beautiful and true saying from Pasteur:* _Too little science leads away from God, while too much science leads back to Him_
"...while too much science leads back to Him"
Reminds me of C.S. Lewis's reminder,
“A young man who wishes to remain a sound atheist cannot be too careful of his reading.”
― C.S. Lewis, Surprised by Joy: The Shape of My Early Life
How though
Yet, reality shows as we discover more about the universe, the god of the gaps diminishes further. Science can give numerous possible logical answers to questions and eliminates the need to adhere to supernatural illogical answers such as god.
Btw, we aren't even certain about the existence of god, but you seem to be very sure that it's a "he". It says much who is spreading fallacies in the name of science.
@@sankalp2520 we’ve seen this comment a million times when will you put it to rest. You’re not saying anything special. Say that to any modern respected philosopher and they will laugh in your face.
@@Hi-cu2vx See, i dont even need to say anything special. 😂. Simple logical reasoning is enough to refute their argument based on illogic. Doesn't matter if said a million times if they can't reason even once.
*"docreasonable" is one of the countless trolling accounts of the 65 year old b-allet dancer A-ndrew Eldridge, who told us that water contains molecules of oxygen and the solar circle is a think tank. He's the best representative of Aronra's cult.*
8766b *Shermer admitting that the theists have strong arguments for the existence of God is much like Dawkins who sold to the rtrds a book called "God delusion" and then he said this :* _a serious case could be made for a deistic god_ 😂😂😂😂😂
Stupid said I’m there heart there is no god
ftrr *Shermer admitting that the theists have strong arguments for the existence of God is much like Dawkins who sold to the rtrds a book called "God delusion" and then he said this :* _a serious case could be made for a deistic god_ *And then, even worse, he said this:* _if you look at the details of biochemistry, molecular biology, you might find a signature of some sort of designer_ 😂😂😂😂😂
*Unforgettable one from the great Newton:* _This most beautiful system of the sun, planets and comets, could only proceed from the counsel and dominion of an intelligent and powerful Being._
It’s funny to me how “God” will destroy the Tower of Babel, but allow satellites to float in space.😂
lol
And he allowed a spacecraft with a pagan name (Apollo) to land on the moon several times)
lol, funny how you don't know the difference purpose between tower of babel and satellites. human build tower of babel because they want to denies God, like you did but satellites float in space for knowledge and understanding..
funny to read dumb people comment on what they don't understand
Funny how your pea-sized brain cannot even recognize an analogy. You need to take a remedial English class too
lol
I posed a series of questions on Shermer's blog and he threatened to ban me from his site. At one point I asked him for proof of one of his ideas and he linked me to a German document (Who does that?). He's the most terrified, insecure, unimpressive atheist I know. Little did he know I'm also an atheist.
You are lying --- You never corresponded with Dr. Shermer. Show one of his replies! ---- or apologize you liar.
Pot calling the kettle black?
If you're an atheist certainly you must believe in LOVE.
@@wooddoc5956 What do you think "pot calling the kettle black" means, because you don't seem to know.
@@johnphillips1144 Your post makes no sense.
*Simply beautiful this one from Lord Kelvin says the same thing as all other greatest scientists:* _If you study science deep enough and long enough, it will force you to believe in God._
gghf *Believing in Aronra's cult leads to severe rtrdtion. For instance, the 65 year old b-allet dancer A. Eldridge aka "ergonomover"/"docreasonable"/"2ndchookie" insisted that ostriches have no wings and the Italian translation of Saturday is Saturno.*
*Absolutely beautiful, from Pascal, with love:* _There are only three types of people; those who have found God and serve him; those who have not found God and seek him, and those who live not seeking, or finding him. The first are rational and happy; the second unhappy and rational, and the third foolish and unhappy._
*Very beautiful one from Newton, with much love:* _a-theism is so s-enseless and o-dious to mankind_ 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Although not surprising, studies have found that believers in supernatural phenomena, including gods, angels, and demons, tend to be poor achievers in the academic arena of what is termed ‘systemizing.
The results showed that supernatural beliefs correlated with all variables that were included, namely, with low systemizing, poor intuitive physics skills, poor mechanical ability, poor mental rotation, low school grades in mathematics and physics, poor common knowledge about physical and biological phenomena, intuitive and analytical thinking styles, and in particular, with assigning mentality to non-mental phenomena.
Another potential indication of believers’ poor understanding of the physical world is a tendency for low systemizing. In the Empathizing-Systemizing theory, people who are poor at physical cognition are called low systemizers because they have poor abilities and low interests in such things as map-reading, mathematics, intuitive physics, or technical and motor systems.
Cognition is “the mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding through thought, experience, and the senses.
In other words, theists are so because they are stupid , or less intelligent…. just expressed more sciency or academical.
We know only one study where intuitive physical skills and supernatural beliefs have been addressed: found that belief in God was negatively correlated with scores obtained from the Intuitive Physics Test. In addition, two studies have examined the relationship between systemizing and supernatural beliefs but both assessed systemizing only with a self-report questionnaire. However, another study suggests that low systemizing may be common among supernatural believers. The most consistent difference between believers and skeptics was that all believer subgroups were average or lower in systemizing, whereas all skeptic subgroups were average or higher in systemizing. Finally, one hint in the same direction is scientific education. Supernatural believers are more often students of humanities and social science than science students, and they have more evolutionary misconceptions than skeptics.
So, because evolution is true, God does not exist….
The more the participants believed in religious or other paranormal phenomena, the lower their intuitive physics skills, mechanical and mental rotation abilities, school grades in mathematics and physics, and knowledge about physical and biological phenomena were; the less they reported interests and skills in systemizing; and the more they regarded inanimate targets as mental phenomena.
It should be obvious that those who are more engaged in the logical and mentally challenging fields of math and science and who have flexible minds capable of addressing and conceptualizing ideas from multiple angles would be better equipped to assess the truth of supernatural claims. Therefore, the correlation discovered in this study suggests that believers are ill-equipped to perceive reality.
*Let's talk about abiogenesis. Britannica labelled it as AN IDEA, while the ballet dancer ergonomover (who is trolling here under many different "personalities") was duped that it is a fact......*
Sure, lets talk.
In the post right below this, I laid out seven concrete examples of hard, scientific evidence for abiogenesis.
So, you want to talk? lets talk about that, The undeniable, scientific evidence for abiogenesis that you keep dodging and refusing to even acknowledge, let alone address. Is that what you want to talk about? No, of course not, you are a coward. You wont talk about the scientific evidence that you are wrong, you prefer just ignoring it and hoping nobody notices your humiliation, right little jimmy inceI?
Oh, and by the way, the Britannica article, which you parse a single WORD from the first line of? It is many pages long and goes into some detail about some of the hard evidence for abiogenesis. But you ignored all that, like that coward you ALWAYS are.
You want to talk? Talk about some of those facts. The facts people keep laying out for you and you keep squirming away from like a dickIess coward because you are too ashamed to talk.
@@johngaunt2806 *Sure. let's talk, ballet dancer ergonomover. But after you search in a dictionary for the word "IDEA" and make sure you understand that ideas are anything but scientific evidence or facts or anything alike*
@@atheism-themoststupidrelig8802 I don't give a shlt about you parsing a single WORD from an extensive encyclopaedia definition which you didn't read, and which proves you wrong.
I knew you didn't want to talk. I predicted you would (as always) dodge and evade like a coward. And you did exactly as everyone knew you would. As a coward like you always does.
So, still want to talk? In the post right below this, I laid out seven concrete examples of hard, scientific evidence for abiogenesis.
So, you want to talk? lets talk about that, The undeniable, scientific evidence for abiogenesis that you keep dodging and refusing to even acknowledge, let alone address. Is that what you want to talk about? No, of course not, you are a coward. You wont talk about the scientific evidence that you are wrong, you prefer just ignoring it and hoping nobody notices your humiliation, right little jimmy inceI?
Oh, and by the way, the Britannica article, which you parse a single WORD from the first line of? It is many pages long and goes into some detail about some of the hard evidence for abiogenesis. But you ignored all that, like that coward you ALWAYS are.
You want to talk? Talk about some of those facts. The facts people keep laying out for you and you keep squirming away from like a dickIess coward because you are too ashamed to talk.
@@johngaunt2806 *This word is essential, because it destroys your myth. What about math? It does the same thing. What about your education? You didn't give a sht on it.*
@@atheism-themoststupidrelig8802 You are such an obvious Iiar.
The encyclopaedia entry YOU cited, which you parse ONE WORD from, goes into great detail about the EVIDENCE for abiogenesis, just as I have done.
Math does NO SUCH thing, you Iiar.
And each time you squirm away like a coward, too ashamed to even acknowledge it, let alone address it.
Yopu Iose, and you know you Iose, little jimmy inceI.
e33e *Shermer admitting that the theists have strong arguments for the existence of God is much like Dawkins who sold to the rtrds a book called "God delusion" and then he said this :* _a serious case could be made for a deistic god_ *And then, even worse, he said this:* _if you look at the details of biochemistry, molecular biology, you might find a signature of some sort of designer_ 😂😂😂😂😂
*An exceptionally beautiful one from the 65-year-old b-allet dancer Eldridge aka "docwylde"/"Flandiddlyander":* _codes are random_ 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
*True and beautiful from Psalm 72:*
_Praise be to YHWH, the God of Israel, who alone does marvelous deeds._
_Praise be to his glorious name forever; may the whole earth be filled with his glory._
True and Beautiful quote. Harry Potter: The Chamber of Secrets (Book 2) Doby is given a sock, Doby is a free elf! Glad we are sharing fictional stories!
*Absolutely beautiful, from Max Planck - founder of modern science:* _There can never be any real opposition between religion and science; for the one is the complement of the other. Every serious and reflective person realizes, I think, that the religious element in his nature must be recognized and cultivated if all the powers of the human soul are to act together in perfect balance and harmony. And indeed it was not by accident that the greatest thinkers of all ages were deeply religious souls_
What a load of tosh.
"It seems to me pretty plain
that there is a third thing
in the universe,to,wit,
consciousness which
... I cannot see to be matter
or force,or any conceivable
modification of either..."
Thomas H. Huxley
Biologist and Humanist
fdff *I confess I have the same problem as Lord Kelvin who said this:* _The atheistic idea is so n-onsensical that I do not see how I can put it in words._ 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
*The personality "hammyhog" of the ballet dancer "ergonomover" Eldridge told me that kiwi birds have no wings....* 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
I'm not a ballet dancer darling, never was nor could I ever have been, as I have flat feet. This must be incredibly hard for you to understand and your unaddressed mental health issues don't help. I suggest you seek professional help from a counsellor or therapist.
@@FlandiddlyandersFRS *Hi, Eldridge. It seems you got your "PhD". Congrats!*
*I confess I have the same problem as Lord Kelvin, who said this:* _The atheistic idea is so nonsensical that I do not see how I can put it in words._
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Kelvin also claimed the earth was no more than 400-million years old.
rrt *I wanted to see how a rtrd looked like, so I came here and I met the 65-year-old b-allet dancer A. Eldridge aka "docreasonable"/"ergonomover"/"yeshuaisjoshua"/"cretionists_arecrybabies_ who told us this:*
_Ostriches do not have wings ACCORDING TO ENCYCLOPEDIA BRITANNICA!_
Mr Ergonomover is a dapper-looking chap, full of personality, wry humour, wit and wisdom - with a million fascinating life stories to tell.
*Absolutely a beautiful one from Newton:* _In want of other proofs, the thumb would convince me of the existence of a God._
*The black Africans had their own gods, so Yahweh genocided a million of their population*
"There came out Zerah the Ethiopian with a host of a thousand thousand. So the LORD smote the Ethiopians ... they were destroyed before the LORD." 2 Chronicles 14:12-13
*Really beautiful, quoting the b-allet dancer A. Eldridge aka "ergonomover"/"FlandiddlyandersPhD"/"docreasonable":*
_Dropped from 250,000 to 237,000. That's a drop of -23,000. Or an increase of 23,000 if you want to be pedantic._ 😂😂😂😂😂
No one ever said that, please stop lying.@@atheism-themoststupidrelig5703
*A beautiful one from Bart Ehrman:*_virtually all historians and scholars have concluded Jesus did exist as a historical figure_
*FAKE QUOTE!*
Tall white guy in ancient middle east who knows people called Matthew and John.
...That makes sense 😂
hfffyy *Shermer admitting that the theists have strong arguments for the existence of God is much like Dawkins who sold to the rtrds a book called "God delusion" and then he said this :* _a serious case could be made for a deistic god_ *And then, even worse, he said this:* _if you look at the details of biochemistry, molecular biology, you might find a signature of some sort of designer_ 😂😂😂😂😂
*Unforgettable one from the great Newton, with much love:* _He must be blind who does not immediately see in the perfect and wise arrangement of beings, the infinite wisdom and goodness of the almighty Creator, and 'idiot' he who does not confess Him_
Serious question, what good has your god done for people on earth?
Atheism is not a religion dude
Still waiting for an answer,,,,,
@@Heygoodlooking-lk9kg *My mom taught me not to answer rtrdd questions.*
*The day when the information in the living cell was discovered was a terrible day for Aronra's disciples....*
Seriously what's the big deal with writting all in bold????
@@enomiellanidrac9137 *Think about it.*
*I wanted to see how a rtrd looks like, so I came here and I met the 65-year-old b-allet dancer A-ndrew Eldridge aka "creationists-arecrybabies"/"docreasonable"/"mntllyderanged"/"flandiddlyandersFRS" who told us this:*
_Ostriches do not have wings ACCORDING TO ENCYCLOPEDIA BRITANNICA!_
You were here a year before I arrived, your hateful slurs tell everyone what they need to know about you.
@@ergonomover *You mean I was here before u arrived with this "ergonomover" account, but long after this comment section got s-pammed by ur other accounts as one of my beautiful vids shows?*
One must first understand that he is a Soul [ATMA] or something other than the body
For Example,
As a child grows,he becomes a boy,the boy becomes a young man,the young man becomes an adult,and the adult becomes an old man
Throughout all this time, although his body is changing from a child to an old man,he still feels himself to be the same person
Just see: the body is changing
but the occupier of the body
The Spirit Soul [atma] is Remaining the same
So we should logically conclude that when our present body dies,we get another body
This is called Transmigration of the Soul
So when people die it is just the physical body that dies
That is explained very elaborately in the Bhagavad - Gita [ 2.20 ]
"For the soul,there is never birth nor death.Nor,having once been,does he ever cease to be.He is unborn,eternal,ever-existing, undying and primeval.He is not slain when the body is slain
][VEDIC
Who's "one" Mr QUACK parrot? 🦆🦜
Advaita.
Looks like Larsen is down to his few remaining -brain cells- talking points, so upset about his inability to explain vestigial wings in flightless birds (and eyes of blind cave fish - both explained by evolution). He blathers on about his inability to tell people apart and his sadness that none of the days of the week reflect Christianity (today is Thor's day), the poor little dude.
*"so upset about his inability to explain vestigial wings in flightless birds (and eyes of blind cave fish - both explained by evolution"*
So what? Evolution does NOT explain the origin of life on earth.
So even 'IF' I give you evolution as a fact... you still can NOT explain the origin of life on earth.
Claiming that our genetic code, 'evolved'... 'mindlessly', from pre-existing, 'less' complex codes that 'somehow' learned how it increase their own complexity... WITHOUT 'intelligent' thought... is NOT an 'explanation'. It's a lousy 'excuse'!
And anyone attempting to use this lousy excuse, is going to end up looking 'stupid'.
Do you 'see' 👆 what I mean?? 😆
*Ur rtrdtion makes u think that any real thing that is inconvenient for ur doctrine is "vestigial", but of course u have NO PROOF for that.. The only vestigial thing is ur quasi-void skull.*
@@jimhappnin1425 You must enjoy being continuously humiliated by us.
@@jimhappnin1425"you still cannot explain..." Already did that. I gave you 3 chemical steps to nucleotides, the precursors of RNA, which could do the job of DNA. I have presented some of the hypotheses that attempt to explain the origin of life. Humans have recently evolved the following beneficial genetic mutations (the 'code' evolves): increased bone density, malaria resistance, cholesterol-busting protein, tetrachromatic vision.
Natural selection non-randomly shaped life. Prebiotic constraint operated on RNA world, not totally by chance, but there were no "minds" before neurons and nervous systems evolved.
This origin of life god-gap might close at some point, where will you move the goal-posts to next?
Evolution is a fact btw, thanks for the concession. Life changes over time = fact.
@@FlandiddlyandersFRS Who's 'us'???
It can NOT be 'you'! 👈🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
*Simply beautiful one from Max Planck - founder of modern science, read it carefully:* _As a physicist, that is, a man who had devoted his whole life to a wholly prosaic science, the exploration of matter, no one would surely suspect me of being a fantast. And so, having studied the atom, I am telling you that there is no matter as such! All matter arises and persists only due to a force that causes the atomic particles to vibrate, holding them together in the tiniest of solar systems, the atom._
_Yet in the whole of the universe there is no force that is either intelligent or eternal, and we must therefore assume that behind this force there is a conscious, intelligent Mind or Spirit. This is the very origin of all matter_
"Yet in the whole of the universe there is no force that is either intelligent or eternal, and we must therefore assume..." No, we don't therefore have to assume. Your monumental assumption is founded on nothing but your opinion.
@@mtambov2351 *Since there are only 2 options, we must assume that one which is not proven false, so we have to discount a-theism.*
fff *I confess I have the same problem as Lord Kelvin who said this:* _The atheistic idea is so n-onsensical that I do not see how I can put it in words_ 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
report this guy for spam if you see this comment, he's spamming tons of comments
I’ve tried countless times to contact god, or to look out for a sign that would let me know that he exists.
I totally agree with this Man, i will try to stop being delusional and accept the fact that God doesn’t exists until he proves me the opposite.
What do you expect as "sign"? That the heavens open and you see an old white guy sitting on some chair in the clouds? If you want a sign from God then look no further than at his son Jesus Christ. His whole life is proof of God's existence.
@@friedrichrubinstein2346 "If you want a sign from God then look no further than at his son Jesus Christ. His whole life is proof of God's existence."
How do you know? Just because of a story in an old book?
Do you believe in Sherlock Holmes as well?
@@Steven-ff4wl Nope, but because Roman, Greek, Pagan, Jewish as well as Christian historians of that time confirm it. Read some history books.
@@friedrichrubinstein2346 Those historians did not witness jesus. So they can't conform anything.
Read some history books.
@@Steven-ff4wl Lol, your ignorance XD Historians are called historians because they research and cite reliable sources. These historians didn't witness anything they write about, yet they are considered the most reliable source of history for us today because their descriptions match with all other sources. It was their job as historians to be accurate. What do you think where we got all the information about the Roman Empire and Alexander the Great and all that? Exactly. Those same historians.
I stopped believing in God when I was 5 years old and I ask my Sunday school teacher where did God come from she told me not to question God after asking her about 10 questions now I am 38 years old and I've done a lot of searching and definitely I do not believe that there is a God but to each his own I'm still very respectful of everyone
Arlando Beler what do you believe
@@moralesvlogs549 MYSELF
What are those 10 questions? I can atleast try to answer them
Arlando Beler That's the most 'deceitful' demon in existence! "Self"!! It will surly lead you to destruction!
I'm actually reaching the point of not being so respectful nowadays. Stupidity is still stupidity even when spoken by otherwise intelligent men and women . And that's OK, except when these intelligent men and women are task with teaching our children want is fact and correct in the world. Religion is a weakness that effects millions, and it should be viewed by all of us as just that.. Maybe its time we finally realize that these "otherwise intelligent people" are not quit as intelligent as we once thought they were.
*Absolutely beautiful, from the great Newton:* _This most beautiful system of the sun, planets and comets, could only proceed from the counsel and dominion of an intelligent and powerful Being._
I don't follow any religions, but God has shown me that there are no religions since they are man-made. Instead, he has shown me the reality, which is that he died on the cross to redeem us.
*God is indeed beyond religions. Be blessed in the name of the one who died for us on the cross!*
If religion is commonly defined as belief in and worship of a superpowerful entity such a deity or god, then you are practising it. In reality, there were never as few as 2 human beings, 'original sin' is but a concept, there was no need for a (temporary) human sacrifice.
@@ergonomover *U are the real proof that d-mons are real.*
Would you be so kind as to re-type that in proper English?@@atheism-themoststupidrelig5703
All Gods are imaginary and Jesus is a fictional character.
This was THE MOST lucid explanation of how and why religions evolved. Much more useful to the cause of atheism than attacking religion -- just explain the human causes of it, and all the rest of its bumph just falls away.
If you enjoyed this you should read The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins, or catch the audiobook version here on youtube.
@@grantm6514
Dawkins is a fuckwit. He is far below this guy on well reasoned atheism. Dawkins is a fucking angry, bigoted troll. Appeals to like minded idiots.
@@thedolphin5428 Name calling/insults? At best this portrays an emotionally immature individual and many people who recognize you as such will deal with you accordingly.
@@hammyhog4748
Lol. Ooooo. So mature, so much smarter you are.
Ha ha. Insults ... name calling!. Have you never listened to Dawkins? He is THE MOST insulting of all the celebrity atheists, who never misses an opportunity to name-call those upon whom he chooses to condescend! Go away, you mirror to your own hypocrisy.
@@thedolphin5428 Your request for censorship is rejected. You are still circling around the ideas of ad hominem insults.
What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. Christopher Hitchens.
The stupidity of this gentleman is: he is trying prove/disprove something that is not in science's domain using scientific method. The world is bigger than science and not everything can be measured by science. For example, moral, consciousness, and religion, and maybe arts to name a few.
@Belfast Blue quote someone else... go on
@Belfast Blue ah you're not a reader... read the first comment you subscribed to. Better still 'what's your argument'?
@@seanleith5312 Very DUMB comment!!!
@@seanleith5312 "moral, consciousness, and religion" .... You just watched a video where by Dr Shermer explained exactly where all 3 of these come from... I am sorry, you are an evolved primate from the plains of Africa... Consciousness exists wholly inside a brain for primates... Care to find out? Stop your brain via a chemical for several minutes... I promise, you WILL NOT see anything.
Vedic physics States that time is a subtle energy or force which is manifested before the cosmic manifestation
Time moves the unmanifested material energy and controls the movements in the universe
Without the manifestation
of time,the unmanifested material energy cannot become active and take form
Only after the time fluctuations agitate the unmanifested material energy
Does the cosmic manifestation Begin !
][VEDIC
Total nonsense from people who understand nothing about science and biology.
@@maylingng4107 Do you mean, "people" like 'you'??? 👈😆
@@jimhappnin1425 When are you going to stop humiliating yourself.
@@FlandiddlyandersFRS 'Neddy' want a cracker??? 🦜💨 👈😆🖕
@@FlandiddlyandersFRS 'Neddy' want a cracker?? 🦜💨 👈😆🖕
Every individual living entity
is unborn,and therefore even after the annihilation of the material elementary body
the living entity exists,exactly
like the air within the body
][
👆 ⚠️ *Troll Alert!* ⚠️ 👆
fdfd *I confess I have the same problem as Lord Kelvin who said this:* _The atheistic idea is so n-onsensical that I do not see how I can put it in words._ 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
The idea that the Bible should be taken as historical fact and not just moral philosophy is absolutely ludicrous. I was a Christian my whole life until recently because I realized how brainwashed I was. It’s likely something created our universe from an alternate universe or higher dimension. But to believe that a 2700 year old book and a sky wizard philosopher are responsible for creation, is just so illogical and unbelievable.
@@jaweel6205 *One question, does my post mention the word "Bible"*
@@jaweel6205 Idiot.
"Faith in miracles must yield ground, step by step, before the steady and firm advance of the forces of science, and its total defeat is indubitably a mere matter of time."
--Max Planck, Scientific Autobiography (Williams and Norgate, 1950), p. 155
Maybe he was a theist, but he predicted the total defeat of faith in miracles. oops
*Another beautiful one from the same Einstein:* _Every one who is seriously engaged in the pursuit of science becomes convinced that the laws of nature manifest the existence of a spirit vastly superior to that of men, and one in the face of which we with our modest powers must feel humble._
"Spirit," at best, or Spinoza's God at worst, but Einstein is unfortunately succumbing to a common fallacy: That the universe's emergent and complex workings should humble us to the point of external agency, rather than arbitrary evolution and the fact that we wouldn't be standing here anyway if not for certain types of Goldilock's Zones aiding our coming in this universe, among likely many universes without such fortuitous properties and constants conducive to life.
*Aronra's cult is so prominent that the b-allet dancer a-nd-rew Eldridge made an army of t-rolling accounts and has to t-roll and to carry imaginary dialogs to them non-stop.* 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Darwin theory of evolution - Cartoon science
There is no evidence of evolution from one species to another
There is micro evolution within species
But not going from one species to another
We Only find drawings illustrations
][
_Praise be to YHWH, the God of Israel, who alone does marvelous deeds._
_Praise be to his glorious name forever; may the whole earth be filled with his glory._
*Psalm 72*