Its all about experience and throttle modulation here. Apparently, it should have been most difficult for the little Suzuki . Pajero in more experienced hands would be good. Prado driver took the most difficult method I guess but its massive and majestic articulation helped.
Everytime i watch a video like this i see comments like “the pajero driver should learn how to drive” in every video the driver is the problem? I have to say the Land Cruiser did it effortlessly.
As a Montero owner, what they are referring to is the fact you need to stay on the throttle in order to let the traction control system work. Thus, they are correct when saying the driver needs to do better (notice when the Pajero driver would start gaining momentum, he would take his foot off the gas-neither of the other two drivers did that).
What they are referring to is the fact that the drivers do not get optimum use out of the Pajero's traction control. It is a matter of knowing how to use the tool you are working with.
For every brand the driver is the problem. Go look at videos where Toyota is not making it look easy, and the driver is the problem. Go look at videos where Land Rover is not making it look easy, and the driver is the problem if you look at the comments. All of these use brake based traction control to do this trick. The Paj traction control is not bad, it was among the best, as well as Toyota. Of course there is a lot variation between years and models, and indeed drivers too. Depending how the traction control is setup, it may require certain type of driving style to perform optimally.
All 3 made it through a reasonably difficult obstacle so they all passed, the GV bottomed out at one point so it comes 3rd, the Prado stayed the most flat and stable thanks to better wheel travel so comes in 1st. That leaves the Pajero 2nd.
Okay ,the Pajero has an all independent suspension setup and only relies on TC! The driver should've pressed the throttle gently ! For the LC Prado , it's easy because of the suspension travel !
Prado was lifting its wheels despite taking easier line, by other words it wasn't because of suspension travel (that is only few tens of millimeters better). Remove the ABS fuse of the Prado and it would have massive trouble getting over that without traction control, by other words it was using TC as well.
I wonder how much is the use of constant throttle on the Prado. The traction control requires wheel slip to engage so the Pajero owner may not have managed to engage it by just accelerating too fast and then stopping after a couple seconds. With slow constant throttle, the Prado engaged the traction control as it allowed for some wheel spin. The Prado has also more wheel articulation in the back so that helps keeping the wheels on the ground.
Solid axles and KDSS suspension system of prado is the main that prado could handle the situation easily rather than independent suspension system of pajero and suzuki
Japanese are kings of offroad car production I've driven suzuki grand vitara 2014 2.4L and mitsubishi pajero 2018 v6 3.0L They are both tough and high quality. If someone gives me options to choose a car for journey all around the world I will choose suzuki grand vitara, because it is compact and light in weight and has offroad capabilities, it suits for cities, highways and off roads.
Its all about experience and throttle modulation here. Apparently, it should have been most difficult for the little Suzuki . Pajero in more experienced hands would be good. Prado driver took the most difficult method I guess but its massive and majestic articulation helped.
Everytime i watch a video like this i see comments like “the pajero driver should learn how to drive” in every video the driver is the problem? I have to say the Land Cruiser did it effortlessly.
As a Montero owner, what they are referring to is the fact you need to stay on the throttle in order to let the traction control system work. Thus, they are correct when saying the driver needs to do better (notice when the Pajero driver would start gaining momentum, he would take his foot off the gas-neither of the other two drivers did that).
What they are referring to is the fact that the drivers do not get optimum use out of the Pajero's traction control. It is a matter of knowing how to use the tool you are working with.
For every brand the driver is the problem. Go look at videos where Toyota is not making it look easy, and the driver is the problem. Go look at videos where Land Rover is not making it look easy, and the driver is the problem if you look at the comments. All of these use brake based traction control to do this trick. The Paj traction control is not bad, it was among the best, as well as Toyota. Of course there is a lot variation between years and models, and indeed drivers too. Depending how the traction control is setup, it may require certain type of driving style to perform optimally.
vitara👍💪💪💪💪💪
I drived prado , jeep wrangler ,now Pajero(Shogun) 2019 3.8 it's best offroad for me thanks MITSUBISHI I LOVE U
All 3 made it through a reasonably difficult obstacle so they all passed, the GV bottomed out at one point so it comes 3rd, the Prado stayed the most flat and stable thanks to better wheel travel so comes in 1st. That leaves the Pajero 2nd.
Hater
Okay ,the Pajero has an all independent suspension setup and only relies on TC! The driver should've pressed the throttle gently ! For the LC Prado , it's easy because of the suspension travel !
Prado was lifting its wheels despite taking easier line, by other words it wasn't because of suspension travel (that is only few tens of millimeters better). Remove the ABS fuse of the Prado and it would have massive trouble getting over that without traction control, by other words it was using TC as well.
I wonder how much is the use of constant throttle on the Prado. The traction control requires wheel slip to engage so the Pajero owner may not have managed to engage it by just accelerating too fast and then stopping after a couple seconds. With slow constant throttle, the Prado engaged the traction control as it allowed for some wheel spin.
The Prado has also more wheel articulation in the back so that helps keeping the wheels on the ground.
Yup. V frustrating to watch
Pajero driver needs to learn to drive
Yes that s true, Grand Vitara driver too😂 this is a driver test not car capability test😂🤣😂🤣
Pajero have a super select gear !! This driver have to learn how to put it in LLC
Grand Vitara BEST !
Solid axles and KDSS suspension system of prado is the main that prado could handle the situation easily rather than independent suspension system of pajero and suzuki
Pajero sürücüsü artistlik edir o maşın sürmür. Pajero supper maşındır yolsuzluqda
אין על טויוטה. אלופה !!! 💪
Nice video!!! What size of tires is in the Suzuki?
pajero best auto in world
driver has problem
You clearly weren't prepared for that . The tyres should have more grip
SUV que não tem chassi, não sai inteiro deste teste, por isso estes são os maiorais. Possuem chassi e bloqueio de fábrica.
The vehicle doesn't matter for a good experienced driver 😇
Prado 👍
Suzuki wins! In average price is cheaper unstable.
البرادو شيخ السيارات
הקרוזר כמו ג'אמוס כבד,, לאט ובטוח :-)
الباجيرو أطلق واحد فيهم
Japanese are kings of offroad car production
I've driven suzuki grand vitara 2014 2.4L
and mitsubishi pajero 2018 v6 3.0L
They are both tough and high quality.
If someone gives me options to choose a car for journey all around the world
I will choose suzuki grand vitara, because it is compact and light in weight and has offroad capabilities, it suits for cities, highways and off roads.
suzuki now in india so pajero 100 % japonesse better
prado did what she was supposed to do, suzuki surprised me as much as pajero disappointed me
Driver was at fault, ive never seen a Pajero do that badly before
Pajero should perform better?
Hello, what size of tire in the Suzuki?
Toyota was the best!!!
Landcruiser (all) Is better then Pajero, but pajero is better in sand. I guess, so its landcruiser
מוזמנים ללחוץ לייק לדף שלי:
רכבי שטח משופרים בישראל
facebook.com/offroad.forever/
prado best car...
Good driving in the Toyota
Vitara 👍👍👍
Flot
Try 4Llc and R/D Lock together with the same incompetent driver...
the same place with different cars: th-cam.com/video/eM8Iuu7bRyw/w-d-xo.html
Kings off road
For people who said the Prado is the best and superior!!
Please check our own test:
th-cam.com/video/VbhFuiQoVuE/w-d-xo.html&ab_channel=Offroadtunisia
Suzuki done better comparing as well as with little articulations
הלנד קרוזר כמו טנק
😂🤣😂 this is driver test and not car test. The driver of the pajero and the Vitara has to learn haw to drive😂🤣😂
Hi I can't decide between pajero/vitara, just need car to go to work, fishing, camping and drive around, which one would u recommend me?
@@kbr3096 I think both are good. The Pajero consumption is for sure higher: 13%. But the Pajero is bigger and you can care your camping gear better.
do not use the rear differential lock on the pajero
Why?
Ummm, they don't have a rear diff lock. They have a central diff lock that operates on both front and rear diffs once engaged into 4 high or 4 low.
I have a factory rear diff lock....as do must gen 4's
@@brendan0loughlin419 oops my bad. They do too. My mate who has one told me it was the same set up as my Gen 3 except with traction control.👍
Yep, my 2016 NX Pajero comes with a factory rear diff lock as standard
The vitara used 5 liters of petrol getting through this obstacle
Prado wins
Деградировавшие внедорожники...
Lannnnd cruzer 150 prado 🏆
Mitsu-shitzi 💩💩💩🤭