OUTRAGEOUS NEW TAX ON UTES could cost YOU $15,000! Why the Govt got this WRONG.

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 2.7K

  • @noxide23
    @noxide23 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +545

    I'm a firefighter, and from our perspective EV fires are a nightmare, you need thousands of Liters of water to put it out. Also the amount of toxic smoke that comes off Lithium batteries is alot worse the your standard diesel and petrol vehicles. When a lithium battery is put out it could reignite hours/days/weeks later. There must be a way the people can over throw this spas government.

    • @Typingwithpaws
      @Typingwithpaws 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +37

      how many EV fires have you attended vs regular car fires though?
      Regular cars catch fire all the time (looking at you ford ranger) and no-one bats an eye, EV catches fire and everyone looses their mind! We can thank the media and our conservative culture for that.

    • @Ktmfan450
      @Ktmfan450 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      It's the corporate lobbyists who push this bullshit when Aussies should be demanding better public transport
      Sydney used to have a network of free trams but the lobbyists demanded more space for highways

    • @allenstorr318
      @allenstorr318 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

      The problem is that an ice vehicle is reasonably simple to extinguish, EV's however are not, the lithium fires are intense. Overseas they have to use dunk tanks and leave the EV's submerged for days to make sure they dont re-ignite.@@Typingwithpaws

    • @fambear3650
      @fambear3650 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

      @@Typingwithpaws because like the firefighter said, ev fires are more dangerous. Very hard to put out and once you do it can reignite. Does that happen to regular cars? So thats why no one bats an eyelid, ev fires are much worse than regular car fires.

    • @Impound13
      @Impound13 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Sounds like you will be driving a electric firetruck soon if they have their way, wonder if it could carry all your water and not run out of battery or worse your firetruck catches fire.

  • @smwhiskey
    @smwhiskey 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +214

    For those living under a rock if the new tax goes through, we'll be paying GST, Luxury Car Tax, Emission Tax, Stamp Duty and registration to the Government before we even drive the car off the lot and then we'll be paying a continual stream of fuel excise, more GST, tolls, and yearly rego (not to mention insurance) just to drive around. Reckon the Government is taking more than its fair share of our hard earned dollar. Wouldn't it be nice for a change for the Government to come up with a "solution" to a problem that doesn't involve raising a tax, levy or fine.

    • @Ktmfan450
      @Ktmfan450 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Ban all cars over 2.5T from cities?

    • @lukevidal2758
      @lukevidal2758 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      You forgot the income tax you paid to get the money to buy the car in the first place

    • @Ktmfan450
      @Ktmfan450 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@lukevidal2758I hear they don't have income tax in Mogadishu
      Looks nice this time of year too😊

    • @smwhiskey
      @smwhiskey 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@lukevidal2758 so many taxes you can't remember them all

    • @M3rVsT4H
      @M3rVsT4H 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Ktmfan450 You could have picked any dump in the world for your example, but you picked one known for it's taxation practices. lol

  • @kingrangasempire
    @kingrangasempire 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +233

    mate we all need to stand up together our government is ruling our lives and only filling their own pockets i cant afford to buy a 5 grand car let alone afford a 90 grand ev car we are getting poorer and the government is getting rich we need to stand up to them and say no we will not roll they want us to give up ciggies and when we do thats not good enough they lost 2 billion in tax on ciggies last year alone the ev car burst into flames

    • @81banga
      @81banga 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Spot on mate. All this climate garbage is nothing but an excuse to tax and steal more.

    • @diverse8959
      @diverse8959 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's because Aussies just conform to what ever the government tell us what is the best direction to take. As you said we need to band together and push back finally

    • @Ktmfan450
      @Ktmfan450 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      What?

    • @racingandmusicmylife
      @racingandmusicmylife 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      It’s amazing what people can do when they stand together. Look at many of the protests that happen in France, the farmers one most recently . It’s an easy thing to do but hard for most to actually do it

    • @NateH-qd7bm
      @NateH-qd7bm 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      🙌🏽🤝

  • @mingweihe984
    @mingweihe984 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +43

    As a 4wd driver, I completely with you on the Tax issue. But I need to say,although Aussie vs China 1:30 percentage of emissions is a fact, but I don’t like this comparison :)
    China has 1.4 billion populations and Aussie 28 million. That’s 1 : 50.
    China is the manufacturing hub for the world and it produces all kinds of things that ppl worldwide need daily. That cost fossil fuels. What we produce these days? Kangaroo ???😂
    We should think about how to focus on our responsibilities but not pointing fingers to others, especially those countries like China & India who are doing the hard work that western countries no longer want to. Not mentioning these countries are just able to feed their ppl not a long time decades ago.

    • @donktec
      @donktec 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Agree, a per capita comparison is much more legit.

    • @jai0540
      @jai0540 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Spot the CCP properganda operative. Also found around universities policing international students

    • @FirstLightAdv
      @FirstLightAdv 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Good point

    • @SilverMe2004
      @SilverMe2004 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There is also that thing of, do we really want to be comparing ourselves to China?

    • @Xemis5
      @Xemis5 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      4wd enthusiast - not disagreeing. But in the interest of being 'scientific' Australia has 0.33 percent of the global population (World Bank data 2021) and produces ~1% of World's CO2 emissions, 21.2% coming from transportation. Probs half of that comes from 5OO77Y (not scientific 😉)
      32.6% comes from burning fossil fuel for energy. We should have gone nuclear a long time ago!

  • @RichardDavis-v1l
    @RichardDavis-v1l 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +93

    Wow. People are easily sucked into things they see on the internet. Has anyone here actually read the efficiency standards proposal? There is no tax. No one is saying you can't have a diesel vehicle, just that manufacturers have to offset them.with other more efficient models in their range. This is the same thing that happens in every country except us and Russia. It also impacts new cars only so your old s-box will be fine.

    • @remychadwick2467
      @remychadwick2467 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      It will make cars more expensive for no good reason. It’s a tax by stealth - redistributing wealth from rural Australians to the inner cities.

    • @russellbach5615
      @russellbach5615 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      It still makes them more expensive to buy regardless?

    • @joskonings1715
      @joskonings1715 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      For christ sakes get the facts

    • @remychadwick2467
      @remychadwick2467 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@joskonings1715what facts am I missing? It’s basic economics. Rural people will not drive EVs like city people will because EVs are not suited to rural areas.

    • @tonysambar
      @tonysambar 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Is that you Albo, or some other Labour propagandist.?

  • @MickP3030
    @MickP3030 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +266

    Every single tradie, 4wd and camping enthusiast should be protesting this in every capital city in Oz, similar to the farmers in Europe.

    • @GoogleIsNotYourFriend
      @GoogleIsNotYourFriend 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Do it. So we can see on the news how many stupid people can't actually understand the policy or analysis...and are gullible enough to believe a couple of pissheads talking shit on youtube.

    • @d_d6569
      @d_d6569 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Minority protest!

    • @adammitchell5229
      @adammitchell5229 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      wont cost tradies a cent if they can prove they work out of it... the problem is all the people who got an ABN just to buy a 4by and claim the tax back... never working a day out of it.. this doesnt apply to commercial vehicles or anyone with a genuine log book

    • @karloz83
      @karloz83 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Farmers truck drivers as well see how they go starving them to some sort of common sense

    • @Ktmfan450
      @Ktmfan450 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      @@karloz83 I don't see anyone protesting Coles and Woolworths making billions in profit while ripping off farmers and suppliers

  • @simond2062
    @simond2062 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +354

    It’s time for people to grow some balls and stand up to this shit.

    • @Ktmfan450
      @Ktmfan450 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      I don't give a flying F about rich people

    • @killenukont4170
      @killenukont4170 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

      Need to organise a march on Parliament House to stand against this crap

    • @Think_about_it777
      @Think_about_it777 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Well said mate, we’re all sick & tired of the f__ktard politicians. The world has gone mad.

    • @justinhollis5579
      @justinhollis5579 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@killenukont4170 Yeah that'll work wonders lol

    • @killenukont4170
      @killenukont4170 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@justinhollis5579 I don’t see you putting out any ideas What else are people supposed to to do in this PATHETIC COUNTRY. If we can’t even join up to march in protest against the Government

  • @aaronwynn6564
    @aaronwynn6564 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    Haha just so you guys know... the landcruiser is already out of touch of the everyday Australian to buy ... wish we everyday Aussies had 150 grand to buy a car that used to be worth 85k to 90k...

    • @resenmkd
      @resenmkd 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Bring back the Pajero 😉

    • @stavio12
      @stavio12 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yet we see the 300 landcruisers everywhere. If people are prepared to take a huge loan and get themselves in debt then it's not out of touch.

    • @KK-mc9qw
      @KK-mc9qw 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@stavio12 Prepared doesn't make it smart, especially in this economy, this next GFC will make 2008 look like a blimp.

    • @stavio12
      @stavio12 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@KK-mc9qwNot smart at all but each to their own I suppose.

  • @997speedy
    @997speedy 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    Im in the EV industry in the UK and everything you are saying is correct:
    Extremely dirty to produce from the lithium, where its sourced, packaged and put in to cars the carbon footprint is unbelievable.
    They do not last even 10 years, if they do, there pitiful range is often at the very least halved, the batteries to replace them are not just expensive, it is often impossible to replace them so the whole car goes in the the bin.
    In real world driving you are very lucky to do more than 70% of the claimed range, in 2024 usually about 300km. If you find a fast charger that's working, its an hour to charge.
    They are worthless if you are a private buyer. Due to tech glitches, updates, faults, old technology, poor range and longevity, these things are purely to be leased. However, the residual value is so bad, those costs are now absolutely sky rocketing.
    The fire risk. Yes they catch fire less than ICE vehicles, but when they do it is ferocious and cannot be put out, cargo ships, blocks of flats and entire carparks can go up from one EV fire.
    While it is a nice thought driving through the town emitting no emissions, that 80-100kwh battery needs to be fed. On public charging it would work out to cost 20L/100km in a petrol (also its only as green as what powers the grid).
    Oh and that 600hp 3 tonne vehicle, will deffo make some headlines when these start to be crashed into your Jo's Rav4.
    The disposal..... they go in the bin after a maximum of 10 years if you are lucky.
    This EV bubble that is exploding with either tax incentives, or ICE tax's is going to burst. It is like a religion that cannot be questioned. But when people see the mess that is the public network, or spend any time and drive an EV any distance at all.
    Even in 20 years time the majority of people, who do not have home charging capability will see the big scam for what it is. These EV's are lovely to drive to do boring miles around the city, but even in the UK, this legislation only benefits Londoners.
    Just think where the tech would have taken us if we continued to invest and improve ICE vehicles or synthetic fuels.
    James

    • @captaincnut
      @captaincnut 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Which part of the EV industry.

    • @997speedy
      @997speedy 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Leasing@@captaincnut

    • @ricardobrown4878
      @ricardobrown4878 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      there's no way you're in the EV industry....so many old wives tales. Doubt you've even driven one.

    • @ricardobrown4878
      @ricardobrown4878 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@CJC051 evidence? Sounds like BS

  • @Bigrig90
    @Bigrig90 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    FYI, "Paul Burke, the head of the Arndt-Corden Department of Economics at the Australian National University, rejected the notion that a new vehicle efficiency standard was a tax.
    "A tax is a mandatory charge that collects revenue for the government," he told Fact Check in an email. "This is not the case here - it is a scheme that requires average efficiency standards are met by suppliers of new vehicles, with suppliers able to trade credits to meet compliance requirements.""

    • @Beej-wp6tg
      @Beej-wp6tg 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      wow!

    • @ricardobrown4878
      @ricardobrown4878 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      a tax by any other name.

  • @thuan888x
    @thuan888x 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +139

    ute price goes up then tradie will put there prices up on jobs

    • @TheBlatchi
      @TheBlatchi 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      and that wont effect a single politician so they wont care

    • @kadmow
      @kadmow 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      - tradies will go back to driving Dynas and NPR's (etc).. Or step up to a 4x4 Daily - just keep it longer for the same monthly payments as a Hilux.

    • @AlanBarryGriffinProperty
      @AlanBarryGriffinProperty 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Tradies need to get electric vans they are far more practical and way cheaper to run

    • @philhatherell3711
      @philhatherell3711 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      ​@@AlanBarryGriffinProperty that was pretty funny. You are obviously not a tradie.

    • @asavvyman
      @asavvyman 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Why? Tradies buy a ute and claim it all back on tax already. It's a "business" expense.

  • @davem764
    @davem764 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    Efficiency is such a key word and concept that is overlooked in this debate.
    Internal combustion engines have come such a long way over the years now to the point where they can run on the smell of an oily rag by comparison to yesteryear.
    If we truly want to lower emissions from the food we eat, the cars we drive, the homes we live in etc, efficiency should be the key driver. Why is my dinner caught in NZ, send to Thailand for packaging, and then sold in an Australian supermarket at a price that does not reflect the inefficiencies the manufacturer has exploited to make more money? What about charging an EV, from a non-renewable energy source, and the inefficiencies in the generation, transportation and storage of that power?
    If I owned a house with solar panels, battery banks and a garage to charge my EV in, well then we’ve achieved the end goal. But the reality is the charging network predominantly sources energy from non-renewable sources, and there lies the hypocrisy of it all.
    We should be a nation driven by fact and reason, striving for maximum efficiency. If the task is a farmer who needs transportation that suits the purpose, well then they should be financially incentivised to do that as efficiently as possible. If a ford ranger is the most efficient way to achieve that goal, then they should be even cheaper.
    My two cents.

    • @gkuz9571
      @gkuz9571 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      My 93 Hilux 10l/100, my 2011 Collie 10l/100 , Dad's D22 10l/100. I suspect it's a similar story with the current utes. More power but similar economy. Smell of an oily rag? Surely if you have solar panels and you charge your EV
      Saturday or Sunday you wouldn't need a battery. Plus then you're paying less for power as well. I don't know man. There's a lot of people in Australia with solar panels, are they all getting duped? And I mean saying that the network uses mainly fossil fuel to produce electricity, while currently true is rapidly changing. And EVs are still cheaper to run while that transition is happening. It does seem to me that it is still very intensive to manufacture an EV, and they are expensive to repair which is influencing insurance prices. They also can't cover some parts of the market's needs. But that's ok. I'm going to keep my RC Colorado for many years to come, by which time, I reckon there's going to be an alternative.

  • @BAGALUTT
    @BAGALUTT 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

    Your main argument, "it's not fair!", has the potential to be really compelling, especially coming from someone directly impacted by such changes. This episode could have been impactful, but it often feels like an echo chamber, with repetitive discussions on "what about China," "Australia is only 1%," "it's not sustainable," and references to "the science behind it" without delving into the actual science. Don't get me wrong, I greatly appreciate your work! I just hoped for a more thorough exploration of this topic. - Maybe for the next round table: An outlook on what Australia should look like from your PoV, would be great!

    • @qksmith
      @qksmith 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      totally agree. just say science doesn’t make it so

  • @ericanderson5211
    @ericanderson5211 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    As the driver of both a Tesla EV and a Y62 I can honestly say that I would not buy another EV.
    The big so-called benefit of the EV is the cheaper running costs, but what is happening to this saving as power prices continue to sky rocket?
    EV's are fine around the city but are frustrating on longer drives. For example I did a run from Brisbane to Melbourne and back in just 3 days with an EV and the time spent charging the thing every 300-400 klms almost drove me mad (it is a Model 3 performance so has the big battery and only gets this sort of range at 110 klm per hr). Give me a petrol or diesel car anyday of the week for a long trip.
    If the Government is serious about cost of living let's focus on things that make people's lives better and saves people money (e.g. make solar and batteries cheaper so we can all reduce our usage and bills).
    Finally, Australia does not have the charging infrastructure or the excess power generation to support us all having EV's so the Government is definitely putting the cart before the horse on this one.

    • @motoboggin2619
      @motoboggin2619 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      couldnt have said this any better!

  • @kingjulian1549
    @kingjulian1549 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    From my reading of this proposal a Toyota Hilux WITH the same engine as the current model would incur a carbon penalty of $2,600. That's nowhere near $15,000. And that is with the current engine. If Toyota released a Hilux with say a hybrid petrol/electric drivetrain then you may not incur any tax at all and it may get a carbon credit. It also depends on what other cars are being offered by the same manufacturer and how efficient they are. Some of these hybrid vehicles are already available in the US and they will offer good power and efficiency and will have good range.

    • @matthew.tamasco
      @matthew.tamasco 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nobody is buying the hybrid 4x4s in the US. The are just sitting on lots with deep discounts. We tried them. Power and range are horrible.

    • @lesnish226
      @lesnish226 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The people sent a strong message in 2013 around carbon taxing. Typical of the slimey ALP to try and sneak it back in.

  • @paulconstable7402
    @paulconstable7402 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +45

    In NZ, they give you a DEDUCTION on price of an EV, rather than charging you more for a normal petrol or diesel vehicle. Incentive rather than punishment.
    Also, the infrastructure for EV charging in Australia is waaaay off. You are lucky to get petrol or diesel in some places, let alone a charging station every 400-500km!!!

    • @emmittrock
      @emmittrock 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      They were also charging 4-5k on new utes... The ute tax! Thankfully this has been stopped.

    • @craybro
      @craybro 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Not quite right, NZ (where I live) had a tax on vehicles with higher emissions and used this to fund a subsidy for low and no emission vehicles. This tax and subsidy arrangement was recently taken away by an incoming Government with the justification given as it was no longer needed as the low / no emission vehicle market had enough momentum.

    • @darkcrystal438
      @darkcrystal438 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Yep, thankfully our new NZ govt got rid of the EV subsidy! and removed the ute tax! awesome outcome.@@craybro

    • @JDMJesseee
      @JDMJesseee 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Drove from SA to Melbourne over Christmas to vist family. 8 people waiting at the Telsa charging stations and only two chargers operational. We let the kid and the dogs run on the oval and left after 30 minutes. Wonder how many spent 5 hours waiting for a cable 😂

    • @mgreenesco9955
      @mgreenesco9955 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Trouble is the deduction they give you is coming out of the tax payers so either way they're screwing you.

  • @ShortOrderCook
    @ShortOrderCook 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

    Please keep on top of this issue - it's so important - and the National Park and public space closures as well. Both issues are being experienced worldwide. Thank-you for alerting people to what they are proposing.

    • @xrtango
      @xrtango 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      They're not even arguing facts. It's shameful. This is just euro 6 standards, most if not all new utes are euro 6 compliant. (maybe not the yank tanks but fk them).

    • @Beej-wp6tg
      @Beej-wp6tg 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Do you know we still have coal in this country? So one standard for some, another for others. @@xrtango

  • @j...bro.
    @j...bro. 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +146

    but we saved you 275 dollars on power.. ohh wait we did not do that either.

    • @d_d6569
      @d_d6569 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You need further context for that statement. I’d be keen to hear it?

    • @Ktmfan450
      @Ktmfan450 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Australia needs to nationalise its energy grid as an issue of strategic importance
      Power companies will only do what returns the most profit to shareholders

    • @stuartkcalvin
      @stuartkcalvin 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It's from 2025, as legislated.

    • @KK-mc9qw
      @KK-mc9qw 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Ktmfan450 Everything sold off by Liberals need to bought back. Then all the private companies will be made to compete. Especially the 2/3rds of our gold reserves that howard signed off on.

  • @MrWhitemetal23
    @MrWhitemetal23 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

    It’s not a tax… it’s the manufacturers being fined for not selling more fuel efficient versions of vehicles that are already sold elsewhere. If they are passing that cost onto consumers rather than innovating that’s their greed not the governments. And it’s only for new cars, anything sold before 2025 is unaffected. Pretty smooth transition if you ask me.

    • @hamishmccracken9881
      @hamishmccracken9881 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Spot on. The hyberbole is incredible for political gain. People are falling for the libs lies here. How much more are we paying for fuel at the moment????

    • @Bigrig90
      @Bigrig90 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Don't let the facts get in the way of a good story!

    • @Barracartel
      @Barracartel 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Everyone’s talking about landcruisers but Toyota doesn’t sell a car that is a V8 anymore. They’re investing in hybrid and hydrogen technology. Nissan is the brand that should be talked about

    • @rowangleeson8244
      @rowangleeson8244 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Just wait and see if they don't tax us for diesel vehicles within the next 10 years aswell as raising rego costs. DONT BE NIEVE AND GULABLE!!

    • @Barracartel
      @Barracartel 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@rowangleeson8244 no need to YELL! 🤣🤣

  • @aussiekozy
    @aussiekozy 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    So a few points here:
    -Just because we are responsible for 1% of emisisonss, doesn't mean we don't have a responsibility to be better. Our emissions per capita are among the worst. What's wrong with wanting to do better?
    - EVs are better for emisions long term. There's plenty of research that shows the break even point for them is around 60k km. The upfront emissions cost may be more, but if the Breakeven point is earlier then you can't argue with the math. Sure the grid still relies on fossil fuels, but as that shifts that will be less or an issue. ICE cars will always use petrol/diesel
    - you're talking like engines and diffs don't need rebuilds every so often, those are both big costs. An engine could easily be the price of a battery
    - precious governments have failed to keep Australian car standards up to speed with other countries. This is just catching up. Plus it's not a tax, it's an incentive for companies to do better and reduce their vehicles emissions. 4wds are already crazy expensive, I strongly doubt manufacturers want to have to pass on more costs. In two years this won't be an issue
    - there's plenty of ways for tradies to transport their gear around other than big 4wds. There's plenty of options available and it wasn't that long ago that HSV and Ford utes were the flavour for utes.
    - Recycling does need to improve and it will. Again, Australia is behind due to lack of care, but we will get there
    I love your content, and love 4wding. I just think this conversation is way more nuanced than how you're phrasing it. I'm sure this comment will go down like a lead balloon, but yolo. Love the videos generally boys

  • @greg3095
    @greg3095 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +101

    I never ever thought I'd see 4WD 24-7 do this type of video. Says a lot about the state of the nation very very sad. Keep punching guys we are with you. Ill keep my S5 Y62 and stay away from places that want to charge me more to park.

    • @Ktmfan450
      @Ktmfan450 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Damn and I thought I was tight

    • @feral4mr2
      @feral4mr2 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      This is the 2nd time they've touched on this topic. I'll keep my old rodeo and 👆the grubberment.

    • @Stevegrande1
      @Stevegrande1 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I love nailing it next to a Tesla just for the pure fact is they probably sit there having heart palpitations on the fuel I use when taking off 😂😂😂 my wife laughs when we pull up next to an ev. She says from one end of the spectrum to totally the opposite the other end

    • @Ktmfan450
      @Ktmfan450 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@feral4mr2 That's the point of the tax increase.... To stop people buying unnecessary large vehicles

    • @feral4mr2
      @feral4mr2 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Ktmfan450 I understand that mate. But rarely will Australians buy large vehicles unnecessarily, there's always a use. This is just unnecessary climate change BS agenda crap.

  • @seanhine6929
    @seanhine6929 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    Emission standards on new vehicles are coming if you like it or not. Australia is years behind other developed countries in not already having them in place. $15-20k price increases are a beat up by the LNP.

    • @contributor7219
      @contributor7219 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Good luck getting people to understand what's really going on. They'd rather spill their righteous outrage on the word of people who don't even understand how efficiency standards work. This not to mention the people expressing all this outrage are being saddled with vehicles that are far less fuel efficient than the same vehicle sold in other markets. If our vehicle consumers actually knew how much extra they've already paid because their ute uses far more fuel than the same vehicle sold in different markets, they'd be shocked. It just goes to show how well the LNP can profit from propaganda. 'Look, a squirrel!' 🙄

    • @xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx888
      @xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx888 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Bullshit, it's the labour party, have been telling you most favourite ABC on the radio

  • @GypsyBirdPryLtd
    @GypsyBirdPryLtd 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +67

    4wd trip to Parliament House the numbers will be insane.

    • @d_d6569
      @d_d6569 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I doubt it

    • @RiverWhiskey07
      @RiverWhiskey07 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Farmers with tanker trailers full of liquid manure. A convoy to parliament and start spraying. 😅

    • @rowangleeson8244
      @rowangleeson8244 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Sounds good!

  • @dannyobrien8298
    @dannyobrien8298 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Long time watcher and i drive an 80 myself but the way youre describing the tax just isnt right. The emissions trading scheme essentially sets a standard for emmissions across a companys whole range of vehicles. As companies actually bring in more selection of evs and hybrids theres pleanty of room for ICE vehicles. Keep in mind, this policy is similar to ones in the eu and the us. Our new proposed scheme is less stringent than the one currently existing in the US and they still have all their trucks. This is just one small part of reducing emissions which needs to happen if we want to keep enjoying the outdoors. I dont wana have to tell my kids all of our native wildlife died out after the ecosystem colapsed.

  • @AnanthSarathy
    @AnanthSarathy 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    We have the loosest emissions restrictions, the US have stricter ones and they still have big 4x4's I think you may have bitten the wrong PR brief.

    • @davidwest9874
      @davidwest9874 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Big 4x4’s in the US are exempt under their emission laws. This also includes train locomotives that are diesel/electric.

  • @kylecarsley1781
    @kylecarsley1781 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    It’s not just Australia, it’s happening everywhere unfortunately. I’m glad you got a chance to visit the US and hit some rad trails, never know when they will get closed for environmental reasons. Thank you for putting the discussion out there!

  • @banno78
    @banno78 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +114

    If they try introduce this tax, we should organise a protest at Parliament House.

    • @xrtango
      @xrtango 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      I wish people would dig a little deeper. It's not a tax, your current vehicle is unaffected. It's bringing in Euro 6 emissions standards. The 4cyc common rail turbo diesels found in most utes are already compliant. The new landcruiser is euro 6 compliant.
      4WD247 do better.

    • @nicholasrice2428
      @nicholasrice2428 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      XXXX THERE IS NO NEW “UTE AND HEAVY VEHICLE TAX” XXXX
      Wow 4wd24/7 I cannot believe my ears! Who paid for this segment I wonder? Someone from the LNP? As someone who watches parliament closely I can tell you with certainty that there are not any new taxes being imposed.
      Currently Australia has NO FUEL EFFICIENCY STANDARDS! The only country to not have them other than Russia. What the Albanese federal government and Chris Bowen are doing is introducing fuel efficiency standards for NEW vehicles bought in Australia.
      The fuel efficiency standards being introduced bring us to the same standard that they have in the EU and that have been in the USA since 1975!
      Saying that there is a new tax being imposed is something that the Liberal and National parties have made up to spread misinformation.
      It is misleading to tell people that the government is imposing taxes that don’t exist!
      4WD24/7 is in the pocket of certain politicians it would seem!

    • @EnjoyEveryMoment88
      @EnjoyEveryMoment88 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@xrtango totally agree mate. They have obviously listened to Peter Dutton and his mob too much and don’t have the ability to think for themselves or undertake some research.

    • @EnjoyEveryMoment88
      @EnjoyEveryMoment88 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      So like ole mate said. But also, the way around it is simple………. All the four wheel drive companies have to do ensure they are compliant so they don’t fall in that category…. Not really a hard concept right….. many countries already do it…. And they over came the problem quite easily.

    • @Bigrig90
      @Bigrig90 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@theozBandit I call bullshit

  • @jamesbeasley1753
    @jamesbeasley1753 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

    I used to be proud to be an Aussie, more recently not so much. But, videos like this give me hope. Keep it up lads, keep speaking up.

    • @GoogleIsNotYourFriend
      @GoogleIsNotYourFriend 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So you stopped being a proud Aussie...because you watching idiots like this who are wrong? Get off social media, clearly rots the brains of those who can't fend for themselves.

  • @Mack74
    @Mack74 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    It's a fuel efficiency standard, it's worrying your getting your news from Mr PotatoHead. Loads of other countries have this standard. Even NZ have it..

    • @ZoranAnanijev
      @ZoranAnanijev 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      just because others have it doesnt mean its better!

  • @brodie1686
    @brodie1686 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If they bring this in how are Australians supposed to afford it yet if they get rid of all diesels and petrols then farmers,trucks and 4wdrivers are going to struggle you can’t just charge the car out in the outback bush or on your farm. Then a truck will be wasting money by waiting for the batteries to charge to keep going hence then missing deadlines cheers boys

  • @jaredscott4829
    @jaredscott4829 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    The $15k thing is a furphy, thats if they can't offset it with another sale. Basically it wont actually happen you've fell hook line and sinker. Its objectively greener, but would love for you boys to have a debate over it with the CSIRO or the scientists who put together the Green Vehicle Guide. We are also 3x more than 1% of world emissions, per capita we are massive. Note this doesn't apply to commercial prime movers and i'd love to see one run 24/7, whats it not being unloaded or something? Even a two crew tractor has downtime every day, by law. Probs need to stick to 4wd stuff and stay away from the science.

    • @WillCheang
      @WillCheang 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Where do the costs of the offset go? To the people

  • @drgloverable
    @drgloverable 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +71

    Fellas.... The govt want to introduce fuel efficiency standards for the industry (like in the rest of the developed world). How you get to a ute tax from that is right wing PR misinformation.
    You get all riled up, you get a community of people who look up to and respect what you do riled up, and do yourself a disservice where you could advocate at a higher level if you talk sense not emotive non-sense.

    • @matthewl.8312
      @matthewl.8312 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      This, so much, this. The US have stricter emissions rules than AUS. Still plenty of 4Bs over there.
      Shauns lack of engagement in the political process shows here. He's either an unwittingly repeating FCAI talking points or deliberately repeating them. Either is not a great look.
      It's also very evident where the team gets their news from with beat ups like this.

    • @lock386
      @lock386 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      It’s amazing how many people they take this video at fact and don’t actually do the research…Your right 4WD 24/7 has failed their community by making such a sloppy video.

    • @rowangleeson8244
      @rowangleeson8244 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I agree with 4x4 24/7.
      Don't be gullible people!

    • @rowangleeson8244
      @rowangleeson8244 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Btw, they have the absolute right and free will to watch whatever news they like, that choice is not yours thankfully or the govts in a democracy,....ahhhh now we are getting to the point, you don't want to admit that our govt plus many others are heading for communism. But i get it, sticking your head in the sand makes it way easier to cope with if you can't face it head on. Unfortunately in the end this approach hurts ALL of us! In a few years you will see these taxes plus many more things happen.

    • @rowangleeson8244
      @rowangleeson8244 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Btw, they have the absolute right and free will to watch whatever news they like, that choice is not yours thankfully or the govts in a democracy,....ahhhh now we are getting to the point, you don't want to admit that our govt plus many others are heading for communism. But i get it, sticking your head in the sand makes it way easier to cope with if you can't face it head on. Unfortunately in the end this approach hurts ALL of us! In a few years you will see these taxes plus many more things happen.

  • @HookandFire
    @HookandFire 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Mate, we need someone like you guys in power making these decisions, clean up Australia first by cleaning up our government. I drive a 79 for remote work and a 100 series for my family daily driver/tourer, an ev wouldn’t even come close to fitting my requirements day to day, not everyone’s life is confined to suburbia sipping a latte. Keep up the good work guys

    • @trixxy8111
      @trixxy8111 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      lol this pair of beer swilling morons!!?? are you kidding!

    • @sriley064
      @sriley064 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      As much as i despise the Ranger sized shitboxes, exceptions should be made pending a negative drug test for Meth and a dashcam which proves you don't tailgate everyone like 99% of these vehicles do

  • @christopherharris6005
    @christopherharris6005 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Awesome video as always 4WD 24/7 Crew.

  • @markhowells13
    @markhowells13 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    Christ .. ‘tax every vehicle’ ? … the new efficiency standards don’t touch existing vehicles at all.
    Australia is one of only 2 countries in the world that doesn’t have efficiency standards ..

    • @jk66
      @jk66 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Exactly the intent. If it burns Dino juice they want to tax you into extinction

    • @yobgow
      @yobgow 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah but then the cashed up bogans won't have anything to cry about how persecuted they are if they admit that.

  • @Rightomate
    @Rightomate 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    We are getting the absolute piss taken out of us by our government. How much we get taxed on our hard earned wages and day to day items is criminal.
    Then to try and reward myself for all the hard work I do and try to go out bush and every second 4wd track Is closed and then get car defected and fined for having 35s by cops on dirt bikes whilst youth crime is out of control and other crimes are being committed. We need to stand up to our government.

    • @andrewcoulter323
      @andrewcoulter323 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      because it's an attack on honest hardworking tax payers...

  • @NateH-qd7bm
    @NateH-qd7bm 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +59

    Without petrol and diesel Australia stops!

    • @Aussiebuilds
      @Aussiebuilds 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Yeah

    • @paultucker4923
      @paultucker4923 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      who said it was stopping?

    • @Ktmfan450
      @Ktmfan450 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Australia needs fuel efficiency standards

    • @ottovpa
      @ottovpa 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      hahaha so you think they're just gonna let Australia shut down, wouldn't be very self serving of them, would it? they'd get voted out in an instant. they don't want to ban utes thjey want to incentivise car makers to bring more efficient cars to Australia@@Aussiebuilds

    • @Ktmfan450
      @Ktmfan450 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @wyomarine6341 So you would prefer every locality to have their own set of rules that can change on a whim?

  • @sovereignaussie8627
    @sovereignaussie8627 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Agreed, and agreed. The madness of these politicians is nonsensical and unscientific in every way.

  • @morganoox3838
    @morganoox3838 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    They are taxing tradies. Tradies going to raise prices. They will blame tradies for cost of housing and inflation

  • @RemoTiso
    @RemoTiso 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    What is your source of the increase to NEW utes due to these changes?

  • @Alecia-Brown
    @Alecia-Brown 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    As a firefighter the best thing for us is the fire trails managed properly, and there r some places that’s just not happening unless the 4x4’s go through and clean it up, the garbage and the fallen trees across the tracks. Us needing to clear those ourselves takes time which can lead to big fires cause we wasted time clearing tracks to get to the little fire, as a 4x4 driver myself my kids r seeing parts of this country they would never see in those ev vehicles. They get to see our true nature not just at a zoo.

    • @SilverMe2004
      @SilverMe2004 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So the rutted out tracks and the bog holes aren't an issuers for you? and as most of those tracks are maintained by parks (whatever state) I do question how beneficial 4x4 are.
      Yes I have chopped up trees blocking tracks, and my wheels are too small to causes your fire trucks any issues.
      I suspect the real value of 4x4s is the increased social value it puts on 'green spaces'

    • @Alecia-Brown
      @Alecia-Brown 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@SilverMe2004 it depends on when parks get to them. And I have been called out to a fire trial to cut up a tree that had fallen over that a member of the public out for a walk found so no park don’t always do it. It is more likely a group of 4x4ers will come across and sort out fallen trees than parks will get to it. As for the wheeling and rock crawling spots they r obviously not part of the firetrails the trucks go on.

  • @cjr4497
    @cjr4497 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

    Tyranny is at an all-time high across the globe.

    • @KK-mc9qw
      @KK-mc9qw 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Ironically, all the wests countries have introduced it because of WEF. Russia and China looking better every day in comparison.

    • @yobgow
      @yobgow 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ok cooker, I'm sure you definitely "feel" persecuted🤣

  • @Wolf4wdadventures.576
    @Wolf4wdadventures.576 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    The 4x4 show is on this weekend in Brisbane.... If 4wd/24.7 are on stage lets give them a standing ovation... For bringing this subject up, Maybe they will talk about this on stage ?

  • @asherwhite5828
    @asherwhite5828 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I agree guys, I don’t think that they’re going the right way about it. But saying that China has 30 times the pollution as an argument is a bit misleading. Most of the products we use every day are a result of that pollution. Also they have 56 times more population than us. I think per person, Australia is one of the biggest creators of pollution.
    However…taxing our 4wd’s isn’t even going to scratch the surface. They would go after the likes of BHP & Fortescue if they were genuinely concerned about pollution. That might damage their precious GDP numbers though. Definitely just a polli trying to justify his job.

  • @ngrin3209
    @ngrin3209 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I love doggo jumping in "dad, dad, ball, stick"

  • @BunyipBattalion
    @BunyipBattalion 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

    I’m not a big fan of the government

  • @Ckktopa
    @Ckktopa 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    We all need to respect each other on the tracks, 4WD, Horses and bushwalkers. We are stronger together when it comes to challenging and influencing government.

  • @mrcho7647
    @mrcho7647 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

    Never thought my patrol would become an heirloom.

    • @Ktmfan450
      @Ktmfan450 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Isn't that the point of buying an expensive vehicle? Hoping that you can pass it down

    • @mrcho7647
      @mrcho7647 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@Ktmfan450 not expensive, just sentimentality.straight swap for my bike!

  • @Shayno92
    @Shayno92 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    I had a little giggle at the fact that the sooty number plate is just sitting there centre screen 😂 probably not helping the cause

  • @terratree2cbbupe300
    @terratree2cbbupe300 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    When the black summer fires come through southern NSW from the Vic high country we had no power or communication with anyone for over a week every road was blocked from fallen trees, three days after the fires had passed it was the locals in there 4wd's who cleared the the roads to come out to check on everyone, the nearest place you could charge a electric vehicle is over a two hour drive there's no electric firetrucks so there was no way some one in a electric vehicle was coming the help us in this time the roads where so bad you needed 4x4 it took the Fire fighters a week after the fires before they checked on anyone because they where all so busy.

    • @4WD247
      @4WD247  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Mate that sounds like an ordeal & we're sorry you went through that! You're so right though, Australia is so big and it would be extremely challenging to have EV everywhere.
      In saying this - we have chosen you as one of our 5 winners of our Raptor bundle prize! To claim it can you please send us a screenshot of this message & reply comment to this post with what platform you've messaged us on - confirming you've sent us the picture. Cheers legend, thank you for tuning into this ep! 🙌🏻
      Note: If the prize is not claimed in 7 days we will have to redraw.

    • @terratree2cbbupe300
      @terratree2cbbupe300 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@4WD247 Gday mate i sent you guys a message on your facebook page from my partners account

    • @terratree2cbbupe300
      @terratree2cbbupe300 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@4WD247 g'day I replied on your Facebook page I had to message from my partners account

    • @terratree2cbbupe300
      @terratree2cbbupe300 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@4WD247 gday I replied to your facebook page i had to message from my partners account

    • @terratree2cbbupe300
      @terratree2cbbupe300 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@4WD247 I replied on Facebook

  • @AusKipper1
    @AusKipper1 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Theres something else a lot of people miss, having a good amount of off road capable vehicles in the country improves resilience. A while ago Ukraine was thinking about trying to import a lot of utes (second hand) from here because there just are almost none in Europe, and now that they are in the middle of a war they have suddenly realized that utes and off road vehicles are very useful things to have around when things go wrong. Off road vans are even more useful (as ambulances), unfortunately they are even rarer. Now I know you can make utes electric however I'm not sure how many working charging stations they have in bombed out cities over there at the moment. I do think the ultimate in resilience would be to have a mix of both, as electric vehicles can be charged with solar etc but for right now diesel is the best we have (for disasters).

    • @4WD247
      @4WD247  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Mate that is very well said, and a good point to bring up.
      In saying this - we have chosen you as one of our 5 winners of our Raptor bundle prize! To claim it can you please send us a screenshot of this message & reply comment to this post with what platform you've messaged us on - confirming you've sent us the picture. Cheers legend, thank you for tuning into this ep! 🙌🏻
      Note: If the prize is not claimed in 7 days we will have to redraw.

    • @AusKipper1
      @AusKipper1 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@4WD247Thanks, however I have a canopy on my ute and no need for any spray coating so feel free to re-draw mine.

  • @dk5245
    @dk5245 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Honestly, I'm pretty bummed at hearing about this.
    I've only recently started getting into the 4wd scene after watching you boys the last few months. I've been putting together my dream Hilux setup and build. To hear that I'm going to be taxed for purchasing and building a vehicle that will help me explore this beautiful country we call home, really is a kick in the guts.
    Like you said, the reason we have these vehicles and do these tracks is to get out there and explore and in fact helps mitigate issues that otherwise aren't spoken about. A lot of hardworking folks, especially in far north Queensland and remote areas of the country rely on people with such vehicles in order to generate their tourism income. I'm all for saving helping the environment but I'm not schlepping an EV Hummer on the old tele track.
    I'm still super keen to get my dream Lux together. Lets hope we can talk some sense into these blokes sipping on lattes.

    • @Ktmfan450
      @Ktmfan450 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The tax they're talking about is in regards to vehicles priced over $70,000 from the manufacturer

    • @dk5245
      @dk5245 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Oh right, Lux is on the cards then :D
      @@Ktmfan450

    • @andrewcoulter323
      @andrewcoulter323 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      did you read Toyota are gonna stop making diesel Hilux and Prados ? opting for some petrol but mostly hybrid engines,,, scam i tell ya !!

    • @dk5245
      @dk5245 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@andrewcoulter323 Breaks my heart 😢

    • @thecrankster
      @thecrankster 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Dude, get the facts. Don't listen to these two boofheads. The laws are getting the manufacturers to sell more low/zero emission vehicles so they can get average emissions down. 4wds would still be sold. Second, it has no effect on second hand vehicles. It's just a matter of getting all the grannies driving electric cars and charging them at home off the solar. Chill man

  • @davidrichards8971
    @davidrichards8971 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    Look up a Cobalt mine and see what it does to people and that's green people

    • @Ktmfan450
      @Ktmfan450 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Australia is one of the largest Cobalt producers

    • @ElisPalace
      @ElisPalace 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Unless you make a car out of wood there is going to be mines involved, EV or fuel. Everything is mined. Unless we go back to the stone ages there will always been mines

    • @Ktmfan450
      @Ktmfan450 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ElisPalace Because there isn't adequate public transport

    • @andrewcoulter323
      @andrewcoulter323 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      yep nothing green about lithium batteries, you can almost feel the child slave labour oozing of off them....

  • @ethancamo9960
    @ethancamo9960 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    I’m currently a uni student in brissy and recently wrote a paper on the practical application of renewable energy and my findings were that not only do we not have enough lithium and other materials to make enough batteries to replace internal combustion completely but even if hypothetically we could replace all cars with EV the sheer strain on the power grid to recharge would be too much, additionally the amount of land required to put in enough solar would take up significant areas on central Australia (killing off large areas of land) but then you’d lose a significant amount of that electricity produced just in transit to major cities and still it wouldn’t be enough to satisfy the electricity demand. We will drive ourselves into the ground and end up with load shedding like South Africa. I am happy to link any of the peer reviewed studies/articles for anyone who is interested in learning more or wants to play devils advocate

    • @Gearz-mu7ud
      @Gearz-mu7ud 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Mmm, how did your study go with the sodium batteries? No lithium required. One of the most abundant minerals on earth and cheap. SA runs completely from home rooftop solar during the day sometimes already. Wind farms and large scale solar don't even operate once the large batteries and interstate connector it at its limit. All this done with no coal, backup gas is being used less and less year on year all in just a few years. Charging some EVs sounds like a good use of all that excess renewable energy we have. Maybe we could use some of the 11.8 billion dollars of taxpayer money given to the highly profitable fossil fuel companies in the last 12mths to help with the infrastructure.

    • @ethancamo9960
      @ethancamo9960 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@Gearz-mu7ud Yeah one of my suggestions in the report was more research and innovation needs to be done into sodium-ion batteries cause they could be a very viable option in the future but currently they have very limited storage capacity compared to lithium batteries so using them in EVs likely won’t happen for at least a few more years. As for SA running off of solar it’s a fantastic example of renewable energy being used efficiently in conjunction with the wind farms however SA also is the 4th largest state with the entire population being less than Brisbane (the 3rd largest city) and I suspect if the amount of EV’s on the road in SA outweighed internal combustion the electricity demand would surpass the output possible from these renewable sources with the average EV consuming 2,000kWh a year if it does 12,000km and the average Australian home using between 4,000 to 8,000kWh annually.

    • @SunnyCoast4x4
      @SunnyCoast4x4 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Gearz-mu7ud I mean that's good for SA but what about all the other states and territories that don't have that kind of infrastructure, I doubt the government has it in its budget to make solar rebates what they once were so putting solar on your roof is affordable for the everyday Aussie, plus the cost of putting batteries at home to store the electricity made will be an additional $6,000 to $8,000 and as old mate pointed out the population of SA is significantly smaller so therefore less electricity demand.

    • @Beej-wp6tg
      @Beej-wp6tg 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Maybe Nuclear Power should have been considered 30 years ago, with a mindset to transition to renewable energies, so we wouldn't be in this position right now.

  • @Livingfor4wding
    @Livingfor4wding 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is unbelievable. Here in nz they brought in this same ute tax and we literally had nation wide protest but they still taxed us fast forward to this year they have dropped the tax on utes/new vehicles. Band together and be loud with a strong message!

  • @mathewdahdah1208
    @mathewdahdah1208 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

    When’s 4WD 24/7 Camping outside Parliament House, I’ll be there with my rig.

    • @gqwarrior6694
      @gqwarrior6694 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I'll come from Perth to join you

    • @stevekeenes4030
      @stevekeenes4030 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      agreed. they have 1.1 mil subs... lets see 1.1 mil people out the front steps of parliament house.... power in numbers peoples..

    • @caphs2107
      @caphs2107 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ooooaar sheeet yeeer!! Haha
      See if albo wears his sheeety akubra then on
      Swag out day-at parliament2024” 💪

    • @Beej-wp6tg
      @Beej-wp6tg 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @Beej-wp6tg
      0 seconds ago
      Maybe for Albo's one-month wedding anniversary, we can all gather together??

  • @410Hamish
    @410Hamish 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    I feel for us 4wdrivers because the the real problem is too many people have huge vehicles that only ever get driven in the cities. Don't know how the government singles them out without adding even more unnecessary bureaucracy. The rapid increase of people treating our tracks like crap and putting on the internet isn't helping the cause.

    • @Ktmfan450
      @Ktmfan450 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Talking too much sense

    • @Hil_lol
      @Hil_lol 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Look i know about these type of people but what about us the tradies the people who need it for work

    • @Ktmfan450
      @Ktmfan450 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Hil_lol Trades persons can claim it all back on tax

    • @Hil_lol
      @Hil_lol 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I cant due to the fact thcar is under my namee

  • @prestoando2691
    @prestoando2691 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    I’m an apprentice heavy vehicle mechanic and it’s definitely feels like it could be waist in the long run if they way the Aus government is going trying to EV everything. I just don’t see it working at all in Australia from trucks to non city living and driving. Ev is not for everyone so they need to stop forcing it to us!

    • @andrewcoulter323
      @andrewcoulter323 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      it's an agenda being pushed from those in charge ! not goverments they are only puppets to the UN and WEF

    • @bjones5240
      @bjones5240 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Waste. It’s spelt waste.

    • @AllInVehicleInspections
      @AllInVehicleInspections 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Don't worry too much, mechanics used to be blacksmiths, we evolved then and we'll evolve again. The only guarantee in life is death, taxes and change, and those that change will not only live but thrive!

  • @bakedbrotatoes
    @bakedbrotatoes 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    A LOT of mischaracterizations here in and in the comments.
    For reference: I own both a 4x4 OffRoad truck and a Tesla, I love both for different reasons.
    1. EVs are statistically much less likely to catch fire than ICEs. Yes they are different and sometimes harder to put out. Not proving any points about anything by bringing this up.
    2. EV batteries are rated to 80% of capacity out to 200k miles. You take care of them, you can drive them a VERY long time without needing a replacement.
    3. There are companies that specialize in lithium battery recycling and reuse. They have fairly good reclamation rates. If batteries end up in landfills something went very wrong. See point 2. This is a much smaller problem than people seem to think it is.
    4. EVs are more environmentally friendly than ICE vehicles after about 15k miles. Accounting for mining, assembly, batteries, energy generation, everything. An EV will emit less than 1/4th as much as an ICE during it's life... Including everything.
    5. Yes I agree with your premise that this tax is dumb. ICE trucks are needed for a very long time... obviously. Anyone who thinks otherwise is, as my pop would say, "as sharp as a marble". No reason to peddle false narratives about EVs to try and make a counter point to this dumb policy. It's just a dumb policy that should never have been proposed. can we leave it at that?

  • @MrArash1381
    @MrArash1381 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    There is no new tax being levied on utes.
    All that has happened is that manufacturers importing cars will have a cap on the emissions their suite of cars can produce. Failure to meet that cap means they will have to buy offset permits

    • @dylanind2629
      @dylanind2629 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      typical 4wd247 😂

    • @nigelransley5050
      @nigelransley5050 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      So - a tax via an alternative “description.”

    • @MrArash1381
      @MrArash1381 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@nigelransley5050well, it’s not based on each vehicle, it’s the total of their production and sale. So as an example, if Ford sells enough EV and plugin hybrid with low emissions, they can continue ship and sell Rangers in Australia with no issue.
      Peter Dutton is idiot and he thinks people are idiot too, to accept his words without doing some research!

    • @xrtango
      @xrtango 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@nigelransley5050 No, mate it's euro6d emissions standards... manufacturers already sell euro6d complaint models of the Utes we have here in other markets (England for example). They will simply have to sell us the same models they're already selling overseas.

  • @j...bro.
    @j...bro. 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    people in nature ( 4wd drivers, hikers, motorbikes, mountain bikes) keep the bush a valuable resource. If we get rid of these groups, or start infighting, then we will collectively loose the mass effect we have on keeping the wild areas useful accessible, whilst still pristine. We need all the passionate people invested.

    • @lindsaybrown5897
      @lindsaybrown5897 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      getting rid of the ability to go into nature so it loses its interest so they can mine the shit out of it

  • @bradleyswift1986
    @bradleyswift1986 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    As if we don't get taxed enough on everything already

  • @elrangooo3327
    @elrangooo3327 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Couldn’t agree more gents!
    Keep talking about it and hopefully it gets some traction.
    There’s sites with hundreds of blokes spreading the word and raising awareness on the matter all over Melbourne.
    Ps. Love the fails!

    • @Ktmfan450
      @Ktmfan450 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Glad to see someone standing up for the people who want to drop $100K on a vehicle to tow their acoustically transparent shitter around the country

  • @warseanwick6775
    @warseanwick6775 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Canadian fan for a long time, it's great to hear you speaking bluntly on the government BS!

  • @dyran85
    @dyran85 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Vote out this current government

  • @williamdavis9253
    @williamdavis9253 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +39

    The government have forgotten about the caravan industry. How do they expect people touring Australia including the outback to use an EV . What a joke. 😢

    • @Degekoify
      @Degekoify 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      They don't that is the point.

    • @148Reaper
      @148Reaper 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Solar panels on the Caravan charging the car. You can travel 20km a day for absolutely free. How good is that.

    • @Ktmfan450
      @Ktmfan450 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      More slowly?

    • @Aaron-x4g
      @Aaron-x4g 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Self entitled thinking. Still will be fuel around for few years to come.

    • @zeeclowns3985
      @zeeclowns3985 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      They serve the WEF and UN shiz not us. Defend your neighbour ❤

  • @philhatherell3711
    @philhatherell3711 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Its called demand destruction. It happend during the oil shock in the late 1970's when governments said that the easy to drill crude oil is going to run out and raised the price of oil to make it too expensive to run the fuel guzzling V8's of the time. They also raised the cost of rego and government interference for manufacturers on V8 cars. To get around this manufacturers then introduced the term SUV's into the market because utility vehicles were cheaper to register as V8 cars became more expensive. V8s also became more fuel efficient as time went by. Australian Lithium (LIT) is a company that has patented SiLeach technology that recycles Lithium batteries.

    • @Ktmfan450
      @Ktmfan450 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Wasn't the Oil shock caused by the overthrowing of the government in Iran by the CIA which shut down oil pipelines in the Middle East

    • @andrewcoulter323
      @andrewcoulter323 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ever noticed we didn't run out of oil ? wells refill over time there is plenty of oil, just another scam to overcharge people for greed...

  • @gumbyenduroadventures6225
    @gumbyenduroadventures6225 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

    Your new 15 minute city will be beautifully paved, you wont need anything bigger than a scooter.

    • @RobertJohnson-uv9ef
      @RobertJohnson-uv9ef 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Until you need work done an trades to comes an materials to come

    • @bogdandanailescu
      @bogdandanailescu 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@@RobertJohnson-uv9efI think the guy was sarcastic 😊 F the 15 minutes cities

    • @ankaris5129
      @ankaris5129 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Yep, you'll own nothing and be happy

    • @billcollis431
      @billcollis431 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      yeah but electric scooters are banned in most states bud

    • @xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx888
      @xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx888 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It's Just the start

  • @thecrankster
    @thecrankster 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    EV batteries can be charged to 80% of original capacity after 500000 kms so that is load of total bull shit

  • @ZacCostilla
    @ZacCostilla 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    So this might be a time to focus on the big picture, that we as an off-road community need to do what we can about being stewards and caretakers of the places we ride and the trails we love so much to show we’re doing our part, because it gives us some credibility to be heard when we make logical, fact-based arguments like this. In the US we try to promote “Tread lightly” for our trails, with simple rules, like “Pack it in, pack it out”, and “Leave it better than we found it”.

  • @kingjulian1549
    @kingjulian1549 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    If you are going to raise this issue on your website, then it is incumbent on the presenters to provide the full details and not just give a headline which is designed as clickbait and to fire up outrage. More careful examination of this issue shows that it is NOT a ute tax at all and $15-$20K more to buy a ute is fake news.

  • @stu-gz9go
    @stu-gz9go 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    Let’s vote together then, you guys have 1.1M subscribers and need to throw your weight around and do some lobbying.

    • @johnjinnette7584
      @johnjinnette7584 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      absolutely right it's time to get political and vote these clowns out

    • @Ktmfan450
      @Ktmfan450 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@johnjinnette7584Nobody can even show these taxes are even going to exist

    • @intimatespearfisher
      @intimatespearfisher 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The left wing government do shit like this. The right wing government defends Medicare. They tag team us from either side.

  • @steveryan7168
    @steveryan7168 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    It shits me to tears that pollies who've never driven past the Blue Mountains try to dictate what cars we should be driving.

  • @boredymcboredface8624
    @boredymcboredface8624 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The real reason to go or hybrid should be the break the stranglehold that Oil countries have on inflation and our economy. We Could also Stop giving all the stupid tax breaks on “company vehicles” that are obviously touring weapons BUT let’s be honest MOST people buying touring and camping 4WD’s aren’t buying new - it’s either the rich boomers or people turning over their car every 5 years and claiming tax on it. It’s also not a left vs right issue either- the cfmeu is the biggest left wing organisation in Aus and I don’t recon they are for it… the argument about Chinese emissions vs Aus is also a bit misleading when china does the majority or our emission creating activities (manufacturing, metal production), and has a larger population. Sorry boys - you normally bang on but there is a lot of parroting dumb internet forums and not your usual well thought out opinions…. That said f no to any new taxes, they already waste enough money they don’t need more.

  • @In0centz
    @In0centz 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    As a tradie,i need a ute to work to load up with tools and tow a trailer. Nothing else can do this like a ute, vans are useless and no ev can do what a ute can do today, maybe one the future if a ev ute can do what a diesel can do now then give incentives to go ev, but why now increase the cost of living even more.

  • @4x4CampingandAdventures
    @4x4CampingandAdventures 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Australia the most taxed country on the planet.

    • @d_d6569
      @d_d6569 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Incorrect

    • @thecrankster
      @thecrankster 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Fuel prices are lower in Australia than almost anywhere except Russia and Saudi Arabia so what are smoking?

  • @joemcauliffe8792
    @joemcauliffe8792 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Good to see 4wd24-7 getting stuck into this. Without a voice what is this 4wd community? Stick it to em boys and help keep us wheeling.

  • @swisscourthustle
    @swisscourthustle 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I’m almost 4 minutes in and I don’t think I can finish watching this.
    I’ve engaged with this channel for a while now and have enjoyed the content, despite my values not completely aligning. I say this so you’re aware that I’m not just some greenie keyboard warrior.
    Your take on the fuel efficiency standards is flawed. It’s not about taking away your precious 4x4’s or introducing a new tax. It’s about ensuring we reduce our reliance on fossil fuels and preserve this planet you blokes are so fond of.
    Yes Australia as a country contributes little to global emissions, but per capita, we are one of the worst emissions offenders. We all have a role to play in this.
    God, imagine how riled up these blokes would get if they found out their current cars would be getting smog tested every year before they can register them.

  • @joshquartermaine5615
    @joshquartermaine5615 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Hey lads,
    NZ labour government introduced a Clean Car Rebate & Fee in 2022. Same as what you’re saying, was a co2 tax or rebate depending on the vehicles emissions. The tax or “fee” was to off set the money EV purchases got. At peak it was around $9000 tax and $8000 rebates.
    New National government has scrapped it as was costing the government money. It smashed the industry hard. The worst part was it was on new registrations, so all that happened is people stayed in their older vehicles which are less emissions friendly over updating to the latest and greatest models with far better emissions.
    Couldn’t agree more, we are being feed a load of rubbish about EVs being greener.

    • @joshquartermaine5615
      @joshquartermaine5615 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Also was targeting people who didn’t necessarily “need” a big vehicle… but what about all the tradies, mobile mechanics etc?

  • @MrLachbella
    @MrLachbella 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Shauna a point to make is
    1:tradies need and use anything from the Mazda bt50 , Mitsubishi triton, hilux, landcruiser to larger tonnage Isuzu, hino etc
    2 primary producers need 4wd of all descriptions through to transport trucks of all tonnage carrying capacities

  • @Boogie597
    @Boogie597 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I'd like to mention something that has been burning me for a while and that is the cost of diesel. think back before Covid, diesel was marginally cheaper than petrol. Covid came along and the Govt reduced the fuel levee by 20c per litre but diesel did not go down. Post Covid the govt increased the levee by the 20c per litre and BINGO up went diesel by 20c per litre. Why? They didn't drop the fuel levee on diesel, but up it went by 20c. Is this the fuel companies gouging diesel fuel vehicle owners? Have I missed something? Why have organisations like NRMA been so quite about it. They usually crow about everything?
    It is the move to get rid of diesel-powered vehicles!!

    • @simmo6035
      @simmo6035 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Diesel is the fuel of the world and its price is heavily dictated by the global economy.

    • @andyg9991
      @andyg9991 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@simmo6035 Its not just that. The vast majority of diesel sold in Australia is sold on contract to large consumers (freight companies, mining companies, etc) The fuel sold through your local servo is only a very small percentage so the price varies at the whim of the fuel companies

    • @Ktmfan450
      @Ktmfan450 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Fuel companies literally decided they didn't want to drop their prices

    • @Typingwithpaws
      @Typingwithpaws 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think diesel is loosely tied to the price of jet fuel as its able to be re-cracked and refined into it so that woulden't help much.
      sucks biodiesel isnt here, not that it'd sell....e85 didn't.

    • @micksalau
      @micksalau 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The excise cut was applied to both petrol & diesel. Keep to the facts.

  • @wsigona
    @wsigona 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    I’ll get an electric vehicle when they put charging stations on the Canning-Stock route.

    • @jayd3931
      @jayd3931 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      How many Aussies have done that route? .01%? However, other countries have shown they can set up charging stations in environmentally sensitive places, that fuel stations would never be approved for.

  • @joelcroft2716
    @joelcroft2716 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I’m a dairy farmer and we need 4wd Utes to keep the farm going.

    • @d_d6569
      @d_d6569 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah I agree. The oyster farmers in Merimbula need fossil fuel to transport their climatic heat destroyed produce to the waste facility. They’ll need money for fuel though as their incomes have been lost to warming.

    • @Beej-wp6tg
      @Beej-wp6tg 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah EV manufacturing is just so green!@@d_d6569

    • @4WD247
      @4WD247  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      100% Joel!
      In saying this - we have chosen you as one of our 5 winners of our Raptor bundle prize! To claim it can you please send us a screenshot of this message & reply comment to this post with what platform you've messaged us on - confirming you've sent us the picture. Cheers legend, thank you for tuning into this ep! 🙌🏻
      Note: If the prize is not claimed in 7 days we will have to redraw.

    • @d_d6569
      @d_d6569 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Should we also have some sympathy for oyster farmers in Merimbula who have lost their seasons income due increases average water temperatures?

    • @joelcroft2716
      @joelcroft2716 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@4WD247 I’ve contacted you on Facebook

  • @rowangleeson8244
    @rowangleeson8244 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Your spot on 4x4 24/7 fellas! Good on you Shauno and Jesse for standing up and saying this. I stand with you!! I do not want to taxed for owning and using a patrol. Dont give in to people reprimanding you both about this,time will show that you are spot on with where our controling govt is heading. This comes from a fellow 4x4er who has seen almost every single one of your vids, and subd a long time ago!
    This is the tip of the iceberg with what govt is up to!
    STAND FIRM 4X4 COMMUNITY, STAND FIRM 4X4 24/7!!

  • @nwjeepin888
    @nwjeepin888 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I also like your point about us off-roaders allowing better access for bush fires. Locally we had a big fire spreading fast. My offroad group had a guy close by meet the fire department and show them how to get to it when they got lost

  • @TropicArts3DDesigns
    @TropicArts3DDesigns 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    Where can I find more information about these proposed taxes? Looked on google and couldn't find anything

    • @brendancostello4528
      @brendancostello4528 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They don't exist, that's why. It would have been talked about or mentioned in a press conference and then the liberals and sky news have ran with it with no bases

    • @biopsiesbeanieboos55
      @biopsiesbeanieboos55 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Because it’s all BS. These two are funded by the National party. It’s become a political channel.

    • @andyg9991
      @andyg9991 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Search for New Vehicle Efficiency Standard (NVES)

    • @ottovpa
      @ottovpa 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

      Because it's not real. the government wants to introduce fuel efficiency standards, which have already been adopted in all other developed countries including the us. it means car makers will be penalised for not selling fuel efficient cars. car makers are saying this means they might have to increase prices to cover this penalty, but in the US prices of trucks and other large cars didn't increase and thousands are still sold. This is where this lie of a "ute tax" comes from. The whole idea is that aussies have a better range of fuel efficient cars to choose from like they do elsewhere in the world.

    • @chickendipper1620
      @chickendipper1620 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah because it's not true. They are not proposing to tax 4wds. Boys clearly did little research. Very disappointing. It's about bringing down total average emissions of the entire fleet a car company sells. Can literally do that by selling more corollas. And lets be honest, how many 300 series or Defenders in cities are ever gonna see the bush?

  • @concerned5467
    @concerned5467 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    The Government is good at meking up science to suite itself

    • @Ktmfan450
      @Ktmfan450 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Dimwits are great at ignoring science

    • @d_d6569
      @d_d6569 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Your making up words!

    • @EnjoyEveryMoment88
      @EnjoyEveryMoment88 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@d_d6569 hahaha classic! You got him. Man that made me laugh. Thanks mate 😂

  • @bentrigg1230
    @bentrigg1230 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    The biggest cancer in our society is the rise of the career politician. Young idealists go through school and university, emerge with a PPE degree then straight into politics for a life on the taxpayer dollar. All have been indoctrinated in the education institutions, without any experience of the real world or any clue what the vast majority of hard-working taxpayers want for their themselves and their children.
    Politicians are supposed to be public servants, employed by the taxpayer to represent them, spend their taxes responsibly and keep their families safe. Instead we have ideologues who are more concerned with signalling their virtue to organisations like the WEF and UN.

    • @justinhollis5579
      @justinhollis5579 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Are you not signaling your own virtues and beliefs by way of this post?

    • @andrewcoulter323
      @andrewcoulter323 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      100% correct !

  • @PK_SAS_Ranger
    @PK_SAS_Ranger 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    As a 19 year old tradie living in the ACT it’s gonna make life driving a diesel Ute a living hell expense wise especially while building my dream build! Have had to start looking at other options to get my rig registered outside Canberra and in nsw .

  • @captcade2913
    @captcade2913 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    How is the OG dirty 30 going?

  • @damiant5876
    @damiant5876 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    Love your passion but you're really just parroting the misinformation of certain news sources. It is a Vehicle emission Standard not a tax. It simply aims to bring Australia's standards in line with countries such as the USA (and the rest of the developed world). It doesn't seek to push everyone into EVs. (I drive an EV for work and my Diesel 4WD for beach and towing.) I think it's great that you're seeking to inform but don't get caught up in the hysteria that misinformation brings to these announcements. A quick google search can provide the truth to this subject if you avoid the sensationalist media who are just creating Click Bait.

    • @drgloverable
      @drgloverable 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      So true.

    • @fostersam0
      @fostersam0 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      But saying the truth doesn't get you views does it

    • @andrew4x4au666
      @andrew4x4au666 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      yeah 100%. Shauno mentioned there was legislation for a ute tax, and there is nothing. They should stay out of politics

  • @BlackFishStudios_HMG
    @BlackFishStudios_HMG 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    How does Australia allow as much coal mining and get mad at the like 25 of the 30 people who live in the entire country who owns a 4by

    • @darrylduck6356
      @darrylduck6356 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      4wd cab utes are the biggest selling vehicles in Australia.

    • @Ktmfan450
      @Ktmfan450 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@darrylduck6356 Because the LNP let hairdressers claim back a Wildtrak as a tax write off

    • @rasta77-x7o
      @rasta77-x7o 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Ktmfan450 And so they should, trades exist and create the country, Labor is just letting in more welfare recipients.

    • @JDMJesseee
      @JDMJesseee 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@nethiuz9165 Or Deepak and his sixteen cousins to drive Uber, taxi or operate your local 7/11

    • @Ktmfan450
      @Ktmfan450 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@rasta77-x7o What's the line up look like down at the dole queue? I take it you're talking from personal experience

  • @tm8747
    @tm8747 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    buy something old and rebuild to new , to hell with the government , get your self a 2wd and convert it to a 4wd , registration will still say 2wd??? that screwing the government back???

  • @mickdayman8664
    @mickdayman8664 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Can't take dangerous good's through a tunnel and funnily enough enough lithium batteries are classified dangerous good's go figure 😮

  • @jayd3931
    @jayd3931 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Just to clarify a few points. Canada is larger and more rural than Australia, and has no problem going with EV;s. They also have a much cleaner grid. Emissions are ranked per capita, so comparing it to China, you need to count the population. Australia has one of the highest emissions per capita on the planet. But at the end of the day, most countries are banning ICE vehicles by 2035, so there will be none manufactured anyways. They just don't want to see Australia become more of a dumping ground. In regards to the second hand market, it is actually strong, and on par with used ICE vehicles, with only 5% difference. But to claim the batteries are an issue, batteries today are expected to last 28-32 years. The average lifespan of a vehicle in Australia is 12 years. Pointing at a Landcruiser is not a realistic example. They are now over $120,000 new, and not the average vehicle on the road.

    • @thecrankster
      @thecrankster 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah, but people don't want facts. They want to exist in a parallel universe of alternative facts where they don't have to change their lives or their dreams in any way. Dreams are a powerful drug and people gonna kill someone if you take away their dreams. And in Australia, a big part of the culture was/is built on ICE dreams. But slowly those dreams died. V8 super cars: dead. Holden v Ford: dead. 4WD culture: in danger. Someone can make hay with that fear. stoke it up.

    • @anthonywhitney634
      @anthonywhitney634 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Canada's grid is cleaner because they use Nuclear power.

  • @craigmcdonald1098
    @craigmcdonald1098 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    This video title is very misleading - the Gov are NOT imposing a new tax. They are imposing new standards on manufacturers, which by the way has been happening every year for decades. Every time there's a new emissions standard the manufacturers put the cost of a vehicle up - just look at the use of DPFs. Get upset about cars being more expensive but direct your outrage at the right place.

    • @smileydave3907
      @smileydave3907 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You sheep believing the GOV BS. You will sane thousands every year on fuel. After new cars come in with so called new std. Then you have to buy a new care. Then buy the fuel. I am in front by keeping my current vehicle.

    • @efibendor1
      @efibendor1 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Vote them out

    • @alexandrosr5179
      @alexandrosr5179 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Government bot ...

    • @craigmcdonald1098
      @craigmcdonald1098 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@alexandrosr5179 are you calling me a bot?

    • @alexandrosr5179
      @alexandrosr5179 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @craigmcdonald1098 no I'm saying who are you to judge on level 1 class players...what you have done to compare or compete with this guys...

  • @lock386
    @lock386 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Geez wouldn’t think 4WD 24/7 be part of the fear mongering that’s going on with these emissions standards. Have a cry. Emission standards are a good thing.

  • @denzal_turner
    @denzal_turner 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I get really annoyed about the taxes on 4wds as someone from the younger generation at 19 just starting to get money together to buy a 4wd and all these tax's could affect me getting one and for me just to have one for only 10 years until I'm not allowed to drive them anymore I feel like I was born in the wrong generation and I wish I could have been born earlier so I could have spent more time getting out and 4wding and camping and exploring Ozs but I sure will not let this affect me now as I'm stilling saving for a 4wd and then I'm going to do a lap of Oz before I can explore as much as I would like to but with your show I have see most of Oz that I might not get to drive on in the future but that's all right because this show is amazing been watching for years now thankyou

  • @PriorsAutomotive
    @PriorsAutomotive 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I’m glad you guys made this. People have no idea of the cons

  • @darrylc401
    @darrylc401 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    Stick to 4x4ing.