I still remember the first time I shot one. I was 11, and the largest gun I shot up to that point was my dad's 3030. Well, I asked him if I could shoot the 30.06 and I should've known to maybe wait till I was bigger when he asked me If I was really sure I wanted to. The thing damn near knocked me over
On the MP90, it’s most interesting trait is the way that it operates. It’s ammo goes into the weapon sideways, and then turns the proper orientation to chamber. It also ejects from the bottom.
My luck id put my and over the ejector in a rush. Then again 3 times ive had rounds go down my shirt back or land in my pant pocket. One in my boot. Same luck with stray cigarette butts actually..
Mechanical engineering. Guns are no different than other machines that use high pressure gases to operate. A steam engine and a machinegun are very similar in the way the function under the hood.
Depends what you intend too use it for ... A pistol sucks at taking moose at 500yds and a 30-06 precision rifle sucks for concealed carry ... The mission determines the gear, not the other way around.
None of this video talks about design. It's all just "neat features this gun and that gun has" when true design lies in the internals and how they affect performance.
I personally think that the pedersen device would've been good as a standalone submachine gun. A weapon that tries to do two things at once may seem good on paper but in practice not so well.
I find it interesting because I could see it having been an alternate path to assault rifles had it actually entered combat? Like I can see them thinking "HUh, it's nice to have the high rate of fire but swapping bolts out was slow. I wonder if there was a way to combine the two into one."
@@flyingace1234 I'm not saying it doesn't always work assault rifles are perfect example of a great and proven concept. Military doctrine is always one step behind technology in WW1 army's we're using Napoleonic era tactics against machine guns.
That doesn't make sense. The point was a cheap modification for an existing weapon, of which they had millions, in a short time period. I feel like you don't understand how expensive and time consuming it would be to design, test and mass produce an entirely new weapon.
As an American who is into firearms. I'd say a beautiful gun design all comes down to personal preference. For pistols the Sig P320 and 1911 really catch my eye Aesthetically. For rifles I'm a big AR guy (Daniel Defense M4).
While I agree with preference because the individual handling the firearm needs to comfortably and safely handle it. You also need to take into account the reason for the firearm. Weather it is for home defense, everyday carry, hunting, they will also have an impact.
One issue with dont hold by mag part. Some guns likely were designed as to be grabbed by the mag. One example that comes to mind is the ppsh41 (papa shaw) as it was designed to be held by the mag.
Love the mechanics of the vector, very exotic. When shooting the Uzi I'd recommend burst fire as you can feel the balance of the gun go whacky due to the bullets weight not being there anymore 😂
Schools don't teach about guns. Only that you need to hate them and let them brainwash your vote to help them ban guns by the time you're 18 (founding fathers actually viewed adults as 21, not 18)
I really like the thought process behind the MULE stock, no longer need a holster for your side arm so nothing on your leg/hip, quick ish draw, like I can see the want behind it
Almost all guns can be trusted. The problem is the familiarity of the gun and some imperfections of the gun which is usually not intentional. I wouldn't want a loose mag socket no matter which gun it is.
Ну это же под Патронажем Оон, значит можно. А русские как всегда едят младенцем, преверженцев Лгбт, ещё мы не навидим всех говнюков одинаково, не зависимо от вероисповидания и расы.
17:12 Right. But the SAW has that "capability" only as a last resort. Anyone who has ever had to rely on magazines to feed the M249 will know just how "good" an idea these things were...lol
@zyvernious Ak took like 30 years until it finally became cheap and easy to make. I'd say it was the Chinese that perfected it first in 1956. Soviets only sold or gave out sks to save on the at rhe time expensive ak47s
Imo what makes a good gun design: - Good ergonomics - Ease of use - Can reliably hit what you're aiming at - Has reasonable stopping power - Physical reliability I'm a big fan of Glock pistols and AK style rifles. Glocks are easy to use and a blast to shoot, same goes with the AK. Ergonomics on the AK may not be _as_ good as the AR platform, but it's simple, reliable, and perfectly capable of stopping any threat.
A good gun design is whatever the generals/investors can be sold on, because like it or not that's what's getting made. Also whatever gun nerds will obsess over in 40 years as well, because plenty of those guns will be kept, treated well, etc for a long time.
All FN Minimi-based machine guns have the back-up side magazine well. The Canadian C9 also sports it. It also barely fucking functions even in ideal circumstances.
For a light machine gun, what if the mag was on the bottom but the gun could be rotated 90°. Like give it sights along the side and the top and fold out stand and maybe even a trigger and grip that rotates or is duplicated.
Ive seen people do this with red dots and sometimes an extra foregrip. Mostly though theyre not thinking through that theyll have shells and gas ejecting in their eye.
Hi simple history I absolutely love videos and your voice is so soothing. Have you ever considering having celebrity guests that are a fan of history or gun fanatics do voice overs. Donut operator, demolition ranch, Brandon herera, popo medic
first thing that came to mind was the very old simpson episode with the revolver and the loudener and "this is for shooting down police helicopters" attachment
Left handed, have fired a Sten. The biggest drawback for southpaws is reloading. It is terribly awkward, I could see stuff being fumbled and dropped under combat conditions.
What’s make a good gun design? It has to be reliable. East to use. Able to adapt in harsh conditions. It must work in the water. Accurate. Easy to maintain. And fun to handling. Also, it has to be quite cheap to make. Strong enough so that it won’t break in soldier level of handling.
I find it interesting how different armies utilize different stances, despite each countries soldiers having the same anatomy. When I was in the german army in a recon batallion, our prone position would often have one leg pulled closer to the torso than the other for added bracing particularly on uneven surfaces, or we would dig holes for the front part of the feet to be put in, for more comfort and additional support if we knew we would be lying there eventually. Shooting while standing would often times happen from a pose effectively called "pooping deer stance" which is a half ducked-half standing pose with legs and arms being close to each other and the torso, that attempts to minimize the profile towards the enemy while still being able to move at an accelerated pace (rather than ducking completely or standing wide open), reducing their chances to hit you, or a vital organ (by having your arms partially in front of your torso acting as a meatshield if you happen to be lucky). Its largest drawback would be that it can get quite uncomfortable when exhausted or over prolonged times, as the pose is pretty unnatural to the body.
Imagine when you see the other scout plane in early plane introduction: Helloooo! How is your day, klaut? Halloooo! Sehr gut mein Britisch Freund! Wie geht?"
37:00 Yeah, that was a good technique for the times, or for when you somehow end up with only a pistol and a flashlight on today's modern battlefield...or as a police officer. But now we just mount a Surefire flashlight to the pistol...lol
No bump stocks the president said you but that on it makes it a bigger bullet and fires faster and more accurate that’s gotta be the best attachment ever
9x39mm (for comparison Ak-47 fires 7,62x39) it is not a pistol cartridge, it's a rifle cartridge and therefore a weapon firing it is an assault rifle, not an SMG.
Correction* AR-15 was not and has never been a military rifle, likewise the MULE stock was not designed for it. M-16 and m4 yes. Also an assault rifle must have full auto, Ar-15 does not.
Actually the mod was the reason why the US Army were looking for an automatic alternative in the post WW1 era to replace bolt guns which ultimately cumulated with the M1
Most SMGs made in the past were supposed to be held by the mag, how else would you hold it? By the insecure area behind the mag? Or the superheated metal directly touching the bullet when firing?
Depends on the weapon. Some rifles/weapons, like the M16/AR15 and those variants have a recoil spring in the buttstock, to reduce recoil. Also, it sounds like that is complicated and slow, to put your rifle down, to get a mag out of the stock. I find it pretty fast to get a mag from pouches on a plate carrier, or belt pouches. I do know some smaller sporting rifles had storage for mags in the stock, but they weren't combat weapons for the most part.
@@chalion8399 I don't mean store them in the stock. I mean that the magazine well and all the mechanisms are in the stock, to create a goofy bullpup gun
Would be unreliable and heavy complicated parts to make a mag that loaded that way, having to get rounds pointed forwards. At best a p90 style might work but it would be awkward and poorly positioned to change quickly, and butt isthe best spot for recoil assemblies.
for the mule tactical, i'd slap it on a survival gun or a bug out rifle, in case the rifle is FUBAR and so is your secondary, or you dont have a secondary, grab the rifle, get the tertiary gun in the stock and save your own hide
And not a single underslung chainsaw attachment? Clearly unrealistic
😂
And it should be powered by gun recoil
gears of war reference :)
@@KF99
Chainsaw bayonet?
@@KF99 powered by Imulsion
*“The answer is a gun, and if that don’t work use more gun”*
- The Engineer (Team Fortress 2)
🫡
Wo0w😅😢
6:50 switching to your pistol is always faster than switching to your buttstock pistol
It seems to solve a problem that was solved long ago.
@@KageNoTora74 or, hear me out it could be used as a backup to the main pistol.
@@idorandomthingsjpgconfusion +19
18:37
This makes the gun a lot more versatile than people think.
i agree
But reliability will be questioned...
@@macobuzi Just as reliable as an m4 just has its recoil spring somewhere else
Imagine if the WWI pilots had something like a Glock Switch for their 1911. The 30.06 is such a great round.
I still remember the first time I shot one. I was 11, and the largest gun I shot up to that point was my dad's 3030. Well, I asked him if I could shoot the 30.06 and I should've known to maybe wait till I was bigger when he asked me If I was really sure I wanted to. The thing damn near knocked me over
30-06 in a 1911?
The M1911 was never chambered in .30-06, which is a fully powered rifle cartridge that the gun can't even fit in the chamber...
@@monomono9627 He was talking about a 1911 and then 30-06, so I was asking if he thought the 1911 was chambered in 30-06.
@@user-sr6bq1ru5dmy comment wasn't directed at you
38:16 Shooting rapid fire while safety is on. Truly soviet.
Пакистан
In soviet Russia putting a gun in to a safety on position makes it even more deadly 😁
On the MP90, it’s most interesting trait is the way that it operates. It’s ammo goes into the weapon sideways, and then turns the proper orientation to chamber. It also ejects from the bottom.
*p90
@@SLIM-SH8Yare you alphabetical
@@Ohnobro707numerical i think
@@glubglub7982 nah he’s eletric
My luck id put my and over the ejector in a rush. Then again 3 times ive had rounds go down my shirt back or land in my pant pocket. One in my boot. Same luck with stray cigarette butts actually..
How do I become a gun designer?
“Don’t.”
When I get older I will become a military engineer
Mechanical engineering. Guns are no different than other machines that use high pressure gases to operate. A steam engine and a machinegun are very similar in the way the function under the hood.
true, a train engineer can also be boiled down to engineer :)
@@robertsmith4681
Depends what you intend too use it for ... A pistol sucks at taking moose at 500yds and a 30-06 precision rifle sucks for concealed carry ... The mission determines the gear, not the other way around.
shut up lmao all you need is one well placed shot. skill issue, spend more time at the range. copium lol
None of this video talks about design. It's all just "neat features this gun and that gun has" when true design lies in the internals and how they affect performance.
I personally think that the pedersen device would've been good as a standalone submachine gun. A weapon that tries to do two things at once may seem good on paper but in practice not so well.
I find it interesting because I could see it having been an alternate path to assault rifles had it actually entered combat? Like I can see them thinking "HUh, it's nice to have the high rate of fire but swapping bolts out was slow. I wonder if there was a way to combine the two into one."
@@flyingace1234 I'm not saying it doesn't always work assault rifles are perfect example of a great and proven concept. Military doctrine is always one step behind technology in WW1 army's we're using Napoleonic era tactics against machine guns.
That doesn't make sense. The point was a cheap modification for an existing weapon, of which they had millions, in a short time period. I feel like you don't understand how expensive and time consuming it would be to design, test and mass produce an entirely new weapon.
@@YourPalHDee yah your right
@RepentandbelieveinJesusChrist5joke's on your I'm agnostic.
As an American who is into firearms. I'd say a beautiful gun design all comes down to personal preference. For pistols the Sig P320 and 1911 really catch my eye Aesthetically. For rifles I'm a big AR guy (Daniel Defense M4).
Honestly I love easy to carry concealable guns like the NTW-20. Compact, light, great for teaching the kids too!
you don't need to clarify you are into firearms when u start the sentence with "As an American" we all know you guys already love guns and Big Macs
@@kerrychen3015 Well if I just left "As an American" it would've came off as Arrogant.
While I agree with preference because the individual handling the firearm needs to comfortably and safely handle it. You also need to take into account the reason for the firearm. Weather it is for home defense, everyday carry, hunting, they will also have an impact.
@@kerrychen3015 Californians and New Yorkers or really just anywhere more liberal
The 416 is the standard conscript weapon in Norway.
With a red point sight, flashlight and verical foregrip.
Really nice smooth shooting rifle.
Simple and reliable.
Prefer revolvers myself, very little to break
Depending on the lockwork of your revolver.
@@avian68tbColt Single Action Army
The turning arm is the most fragile piece of a revolver
You guys need to collab with Ian Mcollum and Jonathan Ferguson. I would like how you guys will animate those two. Merry Christmas🎄
The Pedersen Device was so fuckin cool. It was such a game changer and came just slightly too late.
Seriously!
I wish I could get one lol.
Thumbnail:Santa bringing a gun while the soldiers mukbangs
I love using the experimental M1903 Springfield in Battlefield 1. It's such a comically unique design.
Same, My friends August and Eugene who were in basic trained on the Springfield before switching to the M1 Garand
Remember, switching to your secondary is faster than reloading!
my build in PF is demon
So is not missing, spray n pray just leaves ya out of options.
@@ThirtytwoJ easier said than done
@@minerrem7188 makes good cover i guess, if ya have some to spare.
One issue with dont hold by mag part. Some guns likely were designed as to be grabbed by the mag. One example that comes to mind is the ppsh41 (papa shaw) as it was designed to be held by the mag.
I love how the video about gun designs also has a thumbnail of history’s most ‘famous’ leaders having a feast.
0:44 that guy on the left needs to call his hits.
nobody likes people who don't call hits
The UZI having the magazine in the grip and the kris vector having the bolt go down into the gun to mitigate recoil as I heard.
Love the mechanics of the vector, very exotic.
When shooting the Uzi I'd recommend burst fire as you can feel the balance of the gun go whacky due to the bullets weight not being there anymore 😂
Some also use the Harry’s technique to hold a knife instead of a flashlight, but they’re probably inspired from CoD.
i learn more from simple history than my history classes
Who doesn't tho
they should show these vids. :)
Schools don't teach about guns. Only that you need to hate them and let them brainwash your vote to help them ban guns by the time you're 18 (founding fathers actually viewed adults as 21, not 18)
That's the MA-E-211 SAMPU from Armored Core 6
Yes it is!
I really like the thought process behind the MULE stock, no longer need a holster for your side arm so nothing on your leg/hip, quick ish draw, like I can see the want behind it
7:41
hahaha, BF1 reference, The servant quaarter or point B on Ballromm Blitz.
Its the same building, with the tall structure and windows
6:15 they called the ar15 an assault rifle. Lol!
This reminds me of those people who add every single attachment available to a standard weapon in a CoD game lol
Also Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
Anything that is easy to handle, and that you can trust to work no matter what kind of pain you put it through
Almost all guns can be trusted. The problem is the familiarity of the gun and some imperfections of the gun which is usually not intentional.
I wouldn't want a loose mag socket no matter which gun it is.
19:48 Uh, isn't that a war crime?
Ну это же под Патронажем Оон, значит можно. А русские как всегда едят младенцем, преверженцев Лгбт, ещё мы не навидим всех говнюков одинаково, не зависимо от вероисповидания и расы.
Colt 1911 and Browning M2, perfection. Only if they could create the B.F.G. How does it not hurt doom guy?!?
I fully agree with the 1911,never needed changed, because they nailed it.
17:12 Right. But the SAW has that "capability" only as a last resort.
Anyone who has ever had to rely on magazines to feed the M249 will know just how "good" an idea these things were...lol
Cheap and easy to make, easy to use, reliable. Boom, best gun
So the AK
@zyvernious
Ak took like 30 years until it finally became cheap and easy to make. I'd say it was the Chinese that perfected it first in 1956. Soviets only sold or gave out sks to save on the at rhe time expensive ak47s
Nvm akm came out in 1959. China didn't do stamped type56 until 1965isj
The gun at 11 seconds is the most realistic in the whole video
Imo what makes a good gun design:
- Good ergonomics
- Ease of use
- Can reliably hit what you're aiming at
- Has reasonable stopping power
- Physical reliability
I'm a big fan of Glock pistols and AK style rifles. Glocks are easy to use and a blast to shoot, same goes with the AK. Ergonomics on the AK may not be _as_ good as the AR platform, but it's simple, reliable, and perfectly capable of stopping any threat.
It's quicker to switch to your secondary weapon than reloading!
"from a normal holster"* lol
Yeah, that mule stock is a horrible solution to a problem that was already satisfactorily solved long ago.
A good gun design is whatever the generals/investors can be sold on, because like it or not that's what's getting made. Also whatever gun nerds will obsess over in 40 years as well, because plenty of those guns will be kept, treated well, etc for a long time.
As an artist, I can tell what makes a good gun design: it should be recognizable by silhouette alone.
Good gun design is an engineering problem, not a silhouette or artistic one.
@@beHaski
Buddy, you're too serious. That was a joke.
@@user-co3uc8vt7eit didn't really come off as a joke. This is a history channel, why would he assume you weren't making a serious comment?
@@YourPalHDee
It's an inside joke aimed at those who have heard "recognizable silhouette" advice many times.
On the other hand, if a gun is good beyond expectations, then it's silhouette will become recognizable.
All FN Minimi-based machine guns have the back-up side magazine well. The Canadian C9 also sports it.
It also barely fucking functions even in ideal circumstances.
For a light machine gun, what if the mag was on the bottom but the gun could be rotated 90°. Like give it sights along the side and the top and fold out stand and maybe even a trigger and grip that rotates or is duplicated.
Ive seen people do this with red dots and sometimes an extra foregrip. Mostly though theyre not thinking through that theyll have shells and gas ejecting in their eye.
The Officer: "Struggling"
Those Riflemen: "Standing Around Watching"
My Winchester 70 .220 swift cal. is my fav, also have a Remington 870 Express.
NASA has a special response team?!? That’s very cool. Sometimes the aliens get out of hand
I had to rewind so many times to hear what he said 😂
They're the MIB.
Hi simple history I absolutely love videos and your voice is so soothing. Have you ever considering having celebrity guests that are a fan of history or gun fanatics do voice overs. Donut operator, demolition ranch, Brandon herera, popo medic
It makes a"Pew pew" sound.
first thing that came to mind was the very old simpson episode with the revolver and the loudener and "this is for shooting down police helicopters" attachment
4:44 That pilot needs to dummy cord his pistol to himself. 😮
Left handed, have fired a Sten. The biggest drawback for southpaws is reloading. It is terribly awkward, I could see stuff being fumbled and dropped under combat conditions.
The thumbnail is perfect, crisp, and refreshing for it being the holidays while i am watching your content at the same time
I luv it :)
rifle bayonets werent used for combat but to give fallen soldier that were seriously injured a grace strike
Merry Christmas everyone
What’s make a good gun design?
It has to be reliable. East to use. Able to adapt in harsh conditions. It must work in the water. Accurate. Easy to maintain. And fun to handling. Also, it has to be quite cheap to make. Strong enough so that it won’t break in soldier level of handling.
I find it interesting how different armies utilize different stances, despite each countries soldiers having the same anatomy. When I was in the german army in a recon batallion, our prone position would often have one leg pulled closer to the torso than the other for added bracing particularly on uneven surfaces, or we would dig holes for the front part of the feet to be put in, for more comfort and additional support if we knew we would be lying there eventually. Shooting while standing would often times happen from a pose effectively called "pooping deer stance" which is a half ducked-half standing pose with legs and arms being close to each other and the torso, that attempts to minimize the profile towards the enemy while still being able to move at an accelerated pace (rather than ducking completely or standing wide open), reducing their chances to hit you, or a vital organ (by having your arms partially in front of your torso acting as a meatshield if you happen to be lucky). Its largest drawback would be that it can get quite uncomfortable when exhausted or over prolonged times, as the pose is pretty unnatural to the body.
0:08
MOAR DAKKA! WAAAAAGGGGHHH
it can perform reliably and accurately, it is easy to use, its not too heavy, it can kill
There was a cartoon with a guy in the back seat with a. 45 saying "Let's strafe 'em "
Imagine when you see the other scout plane in early plane introduction:
Helloooo!
How is your day, klaut?
Halloooo!
Sehr gut mein Britisch Freund! Wie geht?"
37:00 Yeah, that was a good technique for the times, or for when you somehow end up with only a pistol and a flashlight on today's modern battlefield...or as a police officer.
But now we just mount a Surefire flashlight to the pistol...lol
31:02:
That guy certainly would *not* have gotten the starring role in Commando (1985)! 🤣🤣
The thumbnail tho💀
I guess that's why some people say that Vanguard is realistic
No bump stocks the president said you but that on it makes it a bigger bullet and fires faster and more accurate that’s gotta be the best attachment ever
This is not related to the video but I find it so funny that i got a ad asking to help the USA government deport quote “illegal aliens”
15:04 yeah well the p90 has a very odd magazine design that makes it flat and it still has normal sights
The gun in the thumbnail looks like the Sampo from armored core
The Peterson device well is the m14 carbine but ww1😮
The best upgrades for a weapon is the magazine
1:18 ayo
_You're shooting, now you're not!_
Coder QWERTY? What are you doing here!? Get back to working on B&I!!!
Didn't the US carry the Eddystone M1917 in WWI? It was also 30/06 but built to function better in the mess of trench warfare.
Yes, The M1917 was a filler for the Springfield as there wasn't enough produced
9x39mm (for comparison Ak-47 fires 7,62x39) it is not a pistol cartridge, it's a rifle cartridge and therefore a weapon firing it is an assault rifle, not an SMG.
Ahh this is exactly what i need to watch on my first xmas eve on my own after dealing with idiots all day
the mag above was the first idea,MADSEN,
I Don't Know Why I Got Recommended This Video But At Least Is Very Informative And Maybe Useful
Fun fact: if you put fun fact at the start of a sentence there is a 99% chance they will read to the end
3:35 Bro, if I saw that in the gun store today I would totally buy it. lol
No "fingerprint" on bullet feel you xD naughty boy
I love your channel keep up the great stuff
Switching to your buttstock is faster than reloading
Bro pulling up on the ops 3:44
Imagine getting a drive-by from an airplane. Can’t believe this actually happened.
Somebody Says "Gun is Gun"
Correction* AR-15 was not and has never been a military rifle, likewise the MULE stock was not designed for it. M-16 and m4 yes. Also an assault rifle must have full auto, Ar-15 does not.
The Pedersen Device soon became the M1 Garand Rifles.
Actually the mod was the reason why the US Army were looking for an automatic alternative in the post WW1 era to replace bolt guns which ultimately cumulated with the M1
22:39 "NASA's emergency response team"?!?!
Yup, it’s part of their security team, NASA needs them in case of any intruders
ah yes the 1940 italian mukbang. 0:00
No bull pups, like the Steyr AUG, a superb select fire weapon.
Lol the horse shoe magazines are always so silly
Most SMGs made in the past were supposed to be held by the mag, how else would you hold it? By the insecure area behind the mag? Or the superheated metal directly touching the bullet when firing?
I love how the criminals are black or homeless people and the girl who couldn't handle the recoil pure gold
Солидарен, где равноправие, где женщина индифицирующая себя Афро трансвиститом сутинером.
I shoot long guns with my left and hand guns with my right although i can shoot handguns with my left I prefer my right.
Why don’t they mount magazines... in the stock? So when you reload, you pull out the magazine from the back
Depends on the weapon. Some rifles/weapons, like the M16/AR15 and those variants have a recoil spring in the buttstock, to reduce recoil. Also, it sounds like that is complicated and slow, to put your rifle down, to get a mag out of the stock. I find it pretty fast to get a mag from pouches on a plate carrier, or belt pouches.
I do know some smaller sporting rifles had storage for mags in the stock, but they weren't combat weapons for the most part.
@@chalion8399 I don't mean store them in the stock. I mean that the magazine well and all the mechanisms are in the stock, to create a goofy bullpup gun
Would be unreliable and heavy complicated parts to make a mag that loaded that way, having to get rounds pointed forwards. At best a p90 style might work but it would be awkward and poorly positioned to change quickly, and butt isthe best spot for recoil assemblies.
for the mule tactical, i'd slap it on a survival gun or a bug out rifle, in case the rifle is FUBAR and so is your secondary, or you dont have a secondary, grab the rifle, get the tertiary gun in the stock and save your own hide
Yeah I'd argue thats the appropriate use instead of a tactical situation
Bruh I wasn’t ready for that first clip homie didn’t have is gun loaded 😂
I like the bottle opener on AKs
The ratio betwen killing the enemy and killing the user is very important 😂
Not gonna lie, seeing the thumbnail Though the people at the table were puking on the table.
What's the use of Muzzle breaks? Just asking
Them jus standing there 2:22
19:50 was that a war crime ?