There are 3 mistakes top gear made in history: 1- they made an american version. 2- they fired Clarkson's team. 3- they thought they could do it without him.
@@fuqu7094 but it wouldn’t hurt for us to speak and write properly would it? Why did your parents even bother sending you to school if you don’t give a shit about the most basic things you were taught?
@@lakschu629Yeah but no one misses the mark as much as him. Without the artificial hype by investors and influencers that get paid, Tesla would be in trouble.
@@garosama4517no it wouldn’t because Elon has and continues to own many other profitable businesses. Dude created PayPal, then made Tesla, boring hole company, has his hand in twitter which is actually unprofitable unlike Tesla and his other companies not to mention many others so you’re just plain wrong? He’s one of the richest men on the earth his car business doesn’t have to make profit to stay afloat he can fund it out of pocket if it gets down to that lmfao billionaire you’re a moron
As of 13th May 2024, these are the updates: 1. Cybercab (Robotaxi) is being unveiled on August 8th. Roadster and a cheaper model are expected as well. That will mark the end of Elon's master plan written in 2016. 2. Solar roof are being installed but adoption is very slow. Power walls and megapacks are a hit. 3. Semi truck is in the hands of multiple distributors (Walmart, Pepsico, Costco) but still not widely available. 4. Full self driving is progressing at an incredible pace. Could be the reason for cybercab unveil. 5. Cybertruck is in production but did not have complete features among other issues, major one being accelerator pedal getting stuck. Features were eventually added in an over the air update. 6. Hyperloop is dead*. Boring is drilling. 7. Neuralink has made significant progress showing patient playing video games. 8. SpaceX and Starlink are revolutionizing the space. 9. X is holding it's own for now.
Elon tried to sue them twice and lost. Their review was fair and not really deceptive. It showed a serious downside of all EVs at that time. Jeremy then did a review of the Model X on ‘The Grand Tour’ saying it was one of the few SUVs or vehicles all three of the boys liked. All scripts are written before a shoot
What's funnier is all of the EV fires involving Tesla. It could be from the lithium-ion batteries.....or the Tesla electrical system not being able to handle the amount of energy stored in 6,750 lithium-ion batteries. I mean, if there's the occasional battery fire from a cell phone or laptop....what does adding 6,749 more alongside it is going to do?
@@delanorrosey4730 The fires that have affected EVs like Tesla, haven’t really been from poor construction or an inability for the electrical system to handle the power delivery but, rather from major physical damage to the battery pack, typically from a collision. If a battery is damaged or punctured, this can cause the cell to overheat, triggering a chain reaction called “Thermal Runaway” that can cause a fire. A battery can degrade overtime and a poorly designed and built battery can become dangerous as it ages through use but, a well designed battery shouldn’t experience these issues unless severely damaged. The reason for having so many individual battery cells in a Tesla EV battery pack, actually helps improve safety by preventing damage to one cell from affecting others, more individual cells allows for better performance in acceleration and top speed and using multiple small cells makes for better thermal characteristics, allowing for easier cooling and space for thermal expansion during use.
Their reviews are never fair, the fact that Musk lost the case doesn't make the review right. EVs were rare at the time and they pretty much ruined the ev cars reputation in the name of entertainment.
Top Gear officially died when Jeremy Clarkson, James May and Richard Hammond all quit when Clarkson got fired for punching the executive producer in the mouth
Elon tried and failed to sue top gear over it though? Clarkson was smug af about it and even when he tests a newer model there a car full of lawyers poking even more fun at Elon before Clarkson calls it like it is
so in passing by he glanced over the script, then read it in its entirety while nobody was looking, and then handed the car over to them anyways. Yeah right.
It seems like you're a musk hater when you're misrepresenting the facts. The ENGINEER handed the car over and then he saw the table. It was an engineer not Musk himself where he could've taken a decision to take the car back. I like how you'll twist things a little to have your fill for the insatiable thirst of hate.
Ok, not once did he mention that martian piece of excrement in his comment. Doubting a story without physical evidence is not hate, and in fact, this comment section has less hate towards the martian than it does love. Folk like you are so biased toward any subject involving the martian that you can't even read and understand the message of any opposing opinion or view. And calling people "Elon haters" for simply doubting a claim without any concrete evidence is weak, old and lamentable.
@@whitebocolate69 imagine Morgan Freeman narrating Earth’s demise, “That’s when Earth’s richest man bought the world’s ‘town square’, in an effort to get rid of the ‘lames and nancies’. Things couldn’t have gone smoother from there.”
Remember why they won? "as any reasonable motorist knows, a manufacturer's statement about the range of a motor vehicle is always qualified by a statement as to the driving conditions under which that range may be expected." In other words, they didn’t use the car for its intended purpose so it’s not expected to hold up
There is a difference between clowning and being intentionally deceitful dude. Gen Z really knows nothing about nuance anymore. It's all either black or white lol.
Should have taken a picture of the script and refuse delivery. Could have just used the picture as proof as to why to never do business with them again
In what world has Elon Musk ever told the truth about anything ? He didnt found Tesla. He created / inventwd literally nothing in his entire life. WTF are you people talking about ?
Because it’s hard to sue a company infact be near impossible to sue and win because majority of there episodes it’s scripted and fake but then again giving a company a bad rep for a script of an episode is wrong
It’s also hard to win a lawsuit when your company releases a counter statement of “ we gave Top Gear two Tesla Roadsters to test neither of which broke down, one had a brake failure from a blown fuse, the batteries going dead is an exaggeration because the charge never got bellow 20%, the charge time was also exaggerated it doesn’t take 16 hours but 3 and a half to charge”. guess a brake failure isn’t that big of a deal.
@@shiffterCL someone posted the full story as to why higher up but tldr: it was because Judge deemed the average viewer would be able to distinguish the difference between road driving and track driving
@@elitex50 I know they are unreliable. I don't like electric cars and hate the fact that people believe they are better for the environment wich they aren't.
They fake a lot to the point idk what was and wasn’t real in the show anymore. Like for the famous reliant Robin (car that flipped easily) was also fake. They installed huge weights to the one side so it would flip at 5mph. Much of it was funny, but with the expectation it was real. Even the Land Rover episode where a brand new SUV leaked water into the driver map light and started dripping, was that real?
"I appreciate the support from Top Gear in recent years" Yeah that's because the agenda has changed from hating EVs to now EVs only. Fuck all to do with support
Tesla lost the case. Jeremy Clarkson said "*On our track* the range was 51 miles." Electric cars lose heaps of range on race tracks, so a range of around 80km on a race track is entirely plausible. They knew that they would run it out of battery so they put that in the script. The car genuinely ran out of power, this was done intentionally, but it demonstrated the lack of range on a race track, which for a two seater sports car based on a Lotus (track car) is important. The review was harsh but fair, and they won the court case for a reason. Stop listening to Elon's whinging.
He only said the script already had planned the car "breaking down". He never contradicted your claims. And what a leap, the autonomy went from 80 km to 600 km
I exactly remember that as I watched it long time ago; it did not break down it went out of juice and preparing a script for that is logical as that was 100% predictable
Idk elon likes his baby called tesla dude almost went broke because of tesla and spacex but didn't sell a man like that would make sure the car is perfect for its first big show 😂i think crap gear is trash old men need to sleep and let next generation surpass them in silent 🤫
The show has them sign waivers allowing the show to say whatever they want. Tesla made the mistake of assuming that meant the show runners were going to give honest takes (good or bad). They were dumb to sign that waiver because these shows are NOT in the business of giving honest opinions about cars/parts. They will promote whatever products and sponsors give them the most ad revenue.
That is over exaggerating. And to be fair, they dumped on french cars, british cars, Chinese cars. A car show doesn't mean hey everyone, every car ever made today is great. Everyrhing is great. Life is fluffy with bunnies and no one's feelings get hurt. Grow a pair, its not like you designed and built every American car yourself. 🙄
Luckily the part about the tesla breaking down was written on the cover of the script in big red writing, otherwise the car delivery guy would never have seen it 😂
@@vinayaksethu5160 next time try to deliver a pizza and read the subtitles of the TV in the living room. Then imagine how much harder it would be to read a small line of a full script on an A4 paper, as if everything was on the front page
@@sfqm1083my guess is he was looking around and it was the title, like "omg electric Tesla breaks down in the middle of the dessert?!?!? One of us dies?!? But none of us were there, so srsly wtf is there to fight about, there's unknown variables that could have taken place
One things Brit’s and Americans agree on is nothing can replace the og topgear Edit: I honestly thought the original topgear was the one with Clarkson Hammond and may. Regardless it’s my childhood and it’s nostalgic
If you mean Clarkson, Hammond and May that was rebooted Top Gear. Not the original. The original show ran from the late 70s to the early 00s. Then after a short break came back in a new format. Which was awful to start with (and May wasn’t even in the first series), took ages to get going then at the end was stale and repetitive. It was past its best
Virgin Tesla: "Oh no, they scripted our car breaking down , this is so sad" Chad Rimac: "You totaled our only prototype and burned it to a husk? Ok cool, here's your watch we have salvaged from the wreckage"
I feel Elon failed to realize that top gear is a scripted show. It was never a serious car review show. Sending top gear a car to review is like sending a game to a polygon journalist so he can review that game
@@dankwedd_yt8197 like pimp my ride was fake. Oh they did shit to the car but they had some shady shit going on and you can look it up. Also all reality tv were scripted to make shit up and get people to fight or argue and just have drama. Like I heard with those bachelor/ett shows they get people to fight by having the camera crew or whatever getting the women to fight. It's in all those shows that people finally tell how it actually went down behind the scenes. It's all funny. I hate reality tv
A lot of people were introduced to various cars through top gear, and they clearly do take the time to review cars. They should have just had Hammond "forget to charge the car" or something, rather than defame Tesla.
Funny enough, the Tesla actually did break down. The brakes failed, not because something was wrong with the brakes, but because the entire electrical system failed.
@@jacob9798 No, they're talking about Top Gear UK! He tried suing them for libel and it was kicked out, then the appeal was kicked out too! ____________ An English court has once again told Tesla Motors to take a hike and dismissed the automaker's latest libel charge against the BBC, producer of the wildly popular program Top Gear. Tesla Motors sued the BBC in March, arguing Jeremy Clarkson and his Top Gear cohorts defamed the company by claiming the Roadster achieved a paltry 55 miles of range on the show's test track. That is significantly less than the 200 miles or more Tesla claims for the car. The program's March 2008 review of the car - which Clarkson praised for its acceleration - included a scene in which a crew is seen pushing the Roadster into a hangar for charging. Although Tesla say it will do 200 miles we have worked out that on our track it will run out after just 55 miles and if it does run out, it is not a quick job to charge it up again," Clarkson said in commentary. Tesla Motors CEO Elon Musk called Top Gear "completely phony" and his company sued for libel and malicious falsehoods. A judge dismissed the suit in October, saying no viewer of the program could have reasonably compared the Roadster's performance on the track to real-world performance on the street. Tesla would not be deterred and returned to court with an amended suit. The same judge, in a ruling handed down Thursday in London, dismissed the claim. He noted that Tesla's amendment was "not capable of being defamatory at all, or, if it is, it is not capable of being a sufficiently serious defamatory meaning to constitute a real and substantial tort," according to The Guardian. He added that "as any reasonable motorist knows, a manufacturer's statement about the range of a motor vehicle is always qualified by a statement as to the driving conditions under which that range may be expected." That, by the way, is a point EV advocates often espouse when explaining range. The BBC was, as you'd expect please by the ruling. We're still waiting to hear from Tesla, and we fully expect Clarkson to say something snarky in an upcoming episode. Source - Wired Magazine Feb 23 2012
@@robertelliott2026 that's fked up. Of course 999 out of 1000 people aren't smart enough to realize that driving on a track at high speeds is not at all the same as regular use on the road. It was most definitely defamatory.
@@ProxCQ anyone watching top gear, at any point in time, knows that a heavier foot, means more fuel used. Meaning most people don’t think an electric car has the same range, no matter how hard you drive it
Weird, how if they faked it, Elon did not win the TWO separate lawsuits he filed against Top Gear. The script is just a made up story to cover up that they make awful cars.
This engineer just sees a script lying there for that exact episode that wasn't in the process of being filmed since they haven't got the car yet omegalul
@@mspaint93 ur so upset that he’s rich and ur not 😂😂 what do u want him to do give away his riches because he was born into wealth? That’s just stupid man we play the hand we are dealt and he played his to the tune of BILLIONS.
Still makes you think how evil people really are, they try to break down any new competition to their business by misleading consumers, paying off public influencers to shit about opponent's products which might actually be better for the consumers and the earth.
Clarkson era Top gear wasnt a show to sell your car for you, especially a very very boring one at that. Its just entertainment. They did they're best to make a slow and silent pos entertaining and it worked.
@@Mrfix-iz4di if you look at 0-60 times as a judgment of speed, I’m sorry to break it to you but it’s not a good metric. Sure it’s quick up to 60 but will it handle corners as well at that speed and continue to accelerate
@@Mrfix-iz4di I drive a 350z, 0-60 times are inflated due to hybrid systems and electric systems. Speed should be measured on the mile or track. And there is no way a car that makes 250hp keeping up with a Ferrari of the same time period. Not in this universe would that be accurate
@@Mrfix-iz4di regardless of whether or not its built on a lotus chassis, they only reason it would out perform a car in ANY aspect is because its electric. hence the problem with a 0-60 time. they're all eletronically limited. you can do more research sure. but you cannot dispute facts. theres a reason f1 is a larger sport than formula E
@@Mrfix-iz4di tou trust claimed 0-60 times? Oh tou sweet summer child. Alright, jt one and aee if you can get anywhere close to 3.7 without a super sticky drag strip and a 5mph rolling start. Car wnd driver did a good segment on how they had to completely destroy the transmission in a subaru wrx sti and perform over 50 hard launches to hit the claimed number. Claimed 0-60 is a fairytale. Tesla still lie about their 0-60 times today
In top gears defence, they were really using it more to show what WOULD happen if you were an idiot and didnt keep your car charged. But it got changed in the cut to seem like they didnt even know it was low
Same story goes for Rover, they took the piss on purpose and clarkson was a pretty huge impact on the brand partially causing Bankrupt besides John Towers steaking money from them.
Agreements like to hold in court, no matter of the circumstances, still kinda ducked tho to do that to small company, but im sure they didn’t mean to hurt the brand, just have a laugh.
@@randomlyfactual1943 it was entirely factual though, the car would run out of charge in less than 60 miles if driven hard the whole time. They also said it was lightning quick and a lot of fun. They just pointed out the other side of the coin in an entertaining manner, as they always do. How's that a dickish thing to do?
He loves his company and if you think about how much of your life gets poured into making a electric car that's reliable that hurts granted theres kinks such as extreme cold weather but they are finding ways to fix it and that's awesome
Context: 1. the scripted part of top gear is lines they use for the studio shoots. 2. They literally won an Emmy for being mostly unscripted. 3. The engineers claim obviously has some lack of context. Why would you be inside the production office to hand the keys when that could just happen outside on track when the tesla mechanics are having it prepped and if there was scripts that say that the question is: why? And if true why would they leave that in the open for non BBC 2 employees to see. 4. And if I'm wrong, then why did tesla lose the lawsuit? 5. The engineer probably forgot that him seeing scripts where when he was retrieving the keys post review and they could have been newly updated scripts.
You could have done a bit of research instead of literally asking a question you didn't know the answer to "A judge dismissed the suit in October, saying no viewer of the program could have reasonably compared the Roadster's performance on the track to real-world performance on the street." So basically they got away with it because the staged breakdown happens on a track and viewers couldn't possibly be so stupid to think that Just because it breaks down on a track doesn't mean it breaks down on the streets This honestly feels like big company versus small company and Tesla grew the short straw and must have not paid the lawyers enough compared to how much BBC paid Don't post context if you don't have context Or at least do some research before claiming you do Also they were most likely giving the keys to the production manager and even if they weren't, scripts aren't secret (especially for a show about cars with little to know spoilable stuff I'm like shows Like The walking Dead where non-disclosure is important) most of the time they will be lying around Edit: Also top gear's not the only people to lie about electric cars they're just the most popular to lie about electric cars If I'm correct this whole incident is why Tesla installs tracking devices in review cars because there was also a reviewer that literally drove in circles for hours and hours in a parking lot just so that he can say his car ran out of battery out of nowhere with no warning even though it warns him multiple times and even gave him enough battery to go to the nearest charge station even though it was at zero percent But he still wanted to drain the battery so he ignored all of them
@@punnup3452 “ 1. We never said that the Tesla's true range is only 55 miles, as opposed to their own claim of 211 or that it had actually ran out of charge. In the film our actual words were: "We calculated that on our track it would run out after 55 miles." The first point here is that the track is where we do our tests of sports cars and supercars, as has happened ever since Top Gear existed. This is where cars are driven fast , and since Tesla calls its roadster "The Supercar. Redefined" it seemed pretty logical to us that the right test was a track test. The second point is that the figure of 55 miles came not from our heads, but from Tesla. They looked at the data from that car and calculated that, driven hard on our track, it would have a range of 55 miles. 2. We never said that the Tesla was completely immobilized as a result of the motor overheating. We said the car had "reduced power." This was true. 3. Tesla claims we were lying when we said the brakes were "broken". They now say that all that had happened was that the fuse to the vacuum pump had failed, which meant that the brake just had to be pushed down much harder than usual. Well, to my mind, if the brakes are broken, then they're broken, and if this happened to your car, you'd take it to the garage to get it fixed. Odd it seems so trivial to Tesla now, because on the day of filming they insisted on repairing the fuse before we could carry on driving the car. ”
@@aaronsams8605 Okay but all that really says is that they didn't legally say anything was wrong So they can't take legal action but the show is still dishonest with how they're portraying the information and not explaining vital information like how the brakes were broken because if I heard the brakes were broken I would be scared I would not assume "Oh that just means the brakes required a tiny bit more force, It's completely safe" But I would also like to mention again that the judge was on the side of top gear because they believed no consumer would possibly consider top gear a reliable source of car reviews And if you're like me you will see the problem with that very quickly as yes consumers are fucking retarded and Would 100% take the advice of a show that is not meant for actual reliable information
@@keenb3041 A British company was being sued. Do you seriously think UK courts have it out for Americans for no reason? I actually believe Elon because TV people are usually dicks, but your argument is retarded
@@keenb3041 they lost cuz they onlu had anecdotal evidence. Whole lawsuit was build on the story that one tesla engineer (who was supposed to make sure the car runs btw) saw a page of the script
Around last Christmas in the UK, there were long queues of teslas trying to charge, but the tesla chargers were broken. Queue was about 20+ hours long. I miss the old Top Gear.
@@lio1234234 If by not you mean to say, That for them to convey as a joke the car indeed failed on them when in truth it did not. Then yes you & I are in agreement. For you see, sarcasm is to say or express the opposite in hopes to be funny, to insult someone or to show irritation. Thus this would be sarcasm with a hint of good ol' dry British humor.
@@lorde0147 no its just fraud and lies. i remember that episode well, that bit wasn't even funny and they were ripping into tesla. im not a tesla fan but defamation and trying to destroy a company reputation for a "joke" isnt sarcasm. i like top gear but blindly defending this is not a good look
@@jtm9945 die sicherheitsvorkehrungen dass man die Hände auf dem Lenkrad haben muss und wachsam sein muss sind aber erst kürzlich hinzugekommen. Früher war das vollkommen egal zumal er aber auch dafür verantwortlich war, dass dieser "Autopilot" auch als autopilot vermarktet wurde. Und wenn man dann halt weiß dass es eigentlich keinen autopilot ist, darf man es halt auch schlicht und ergreifend nicht als autopilot vermarkten. Selbstverständlich hatten die Leute mal ihren Schädel einschalten können und sich denken können dass es kein autonomes fahren gibt, aber man hätte es auch nicht auf solch eine Art und weise herausreizen müssen. Beispielsweise hat er genau wegen dieser Sachlage nicht mehr das Recht in Deutschland mit autopilot zu werben.
@@jtm9945 he claimed that its fully autonomous back in 2018. He constantly lies. Also thats not the only issue read about how auto pilot turns of seconds before crash so tesla doesn’t get any liability for its wrong decisions
@@skyfox585 so thats why every case where people claim it was aps fault they lose the case because evidence shows ot was human error ? It clearly states in the agreement you accept when entering you car the first time at you are reaponsible. Ots not level 5 . Its level 2 to level 3 automony driving . Though i might say the naming is its biggest problem because people dont see the last wprd afterwards . " Fully selfdrive Capability "
His story is BS too, "oh when my 1 guy was there, he saw on the table as he walked past a script that happened to be open and just glanced at that one line" Yeah it is "messed up" Elon. And what's madder than people believing him is that most of the commenters can't see the difference between visual effects on baked eyes vs tears, because people think they see the latter.
My shop is at Sears Point Raceway and I remember when Tesla brought that little red sports car to the drag strip and there was a buzz around the track about this electric car that was ripping down the track! It was definitely a site to see, you have to remember that this is way before Tesla was even a name that anyone knew!
The Hog Rider is a fast ground troop with medium hit points, low damage, and the ability to jump over enemy Walls. He is unlocked at level 2 Dark Barracks. The Hog Rider (person) is a bare-chested dark-skinned man holding a hammer. He has a Mohawk, wears a brown leather loincloth, a red belt, and a pair of leather sandals, as well as two large golden wristbands and a gold earring. His ride is a large hog, about half his height. It has a brown leather bridle looped around its tusks, which in turn is held by the Hog Rider. Hog Riders prioritize defensive structures above all other targets, and will bypass all other types of enemy buildings and troops while any defenses remain on the battlefield. This is true even if they are under attack by enemy Clan Castle troops, heroes or Skeleton Trap skeletons. Note that like all troops that prioritize defenses, Hog Riders do not consider the Clan Castle to be a defense regardless of whether or not it contains enemy troops, but do consider the defending Grand Warden and the activated Town Hall weapon (if any) to be defensive buildings. Once all defenses are destroyed, Hog Riders become like any other troop with no preferred target; they will attack the nearest building to them regardless of type, and will turn and attack enemy units if they become aware of any nearby and can fight back against them. However, they will not switch targets to enemy units until their previous target was destroyed.
There are 3 mistakes top gear made in history:
1- they made an american version.
2- they fired Clarkson's team.
3- they thought they could do it without him.
Hiring Chris Evans was a dumb move.
Thought*
@@heatnup6899 context, everyone knows what he means. if you need attention go cry to your mom
@@fuqu7094 but it wouldn’t hurt for us to speak and write properly would it? Why did your parents even bother sending you to school if you don’t give a shit about the most basic things you were taught?
@@heatnup6899 Don't let the other guy stop you from correcting people's mistakes.
Joe: “Hey Jamie, can you pull up that video of a bear attacking a Tesla?”
Yes Master Rogan. My stomach aches, please master feed Jaime i hunger... Rogen, i already fed you dont you remember
Ngl seeing a bear make attempts at a cyber truck with Rogan as a commentator is something the internet doesn’t know it needs lmfao
🤣🤣🤣 Hey Jamie, pull up that one where the tesla-driving polar bear is chasing the hunter.
@@lancelotkillz what tf are you trying to say
Also add some #pyramids in it. 😅
How deep fried do you want your video?
This guy: Yes.
Was thinking the same thing
Funny thing is, he sued Top Gear and failed. Twice.
Common Tesla (Not the man) L
He still failed to sue them for defamation twice
@@OscarOSullivan literally what i said
"Entertainment" shields them from lies and defamation. Same as Fox "News" propaganda.
@@jonvb2439 Elon wont take you to Mars bro. He doesnt know you exist
Jeremy: "Oh no.. Anyways"
😂yes!
All praises to Jesus Christ the savior of the world.🙏❤️🥹🙌
@@mr.brownn6984 keep wasting your life with that bs, stop shoving religion down everyone's throats
That's him alright 😂😂
@@Quorented umm what? Dude is making shit loads off his programs
You know what is disgusting that top gear did, they fired the Old guys, Hammond, Jeremy and Captain slow
Tbf to top gear they only fired Jeremy because he assaulted someone, the other two left.
@@willw6280 He let his intrusive thought win. I mean let's be honest who dosen't wanna punch their boss not to mention with a lawsuit involved.
Fr
@@Unpredictable21- he didn’t punch his boss. He punched a guy who was essentially working for him. You can’t defend something like that.
@@Wufw0f I'm 100% certain that's the entirety of the important details, because there's never a reason to punch anyone...
Kinda like how Elon faked the Semi truck, solar panels, full self driving, Hyperloop, robo taxi, mara, etc etc
Well said. The Elon fanboys definetly gonna ignore that.
elon is a business man, he tells you want his audience wants to hear, not what the reality of the matter is
@@lakschu629Yeah but no one misses the mark as much as him. Without the artificial hype by investors and influencers that get paid, Tesla would be in trouble.
@@garosama4517no it wouldn’t because Elon has and continues to own many other profitable businesses. Dude created PayPal, then made Tesla, boring hole company, has his hand in twitter which is actually unprofitable unlike Tesla and his other companies not to mention many others so you’re just plain wrong? He’s one of the richest men on the earth his car business doesn’t have to make profit to stay afloat he can fund it out of pocket if it gets down to that lmfao billionaire you’re a moron
As of 13th May 2024, these are the updates:
1. Cybercab (Robotaxi) is being unveiled on August 8th. Roadster and a cheaper model are expected as well. That will mark the end of Elon's master plan written in 2016.
2. Solar roof are being installed but adoption is very slow. Power walls and megapacks are a hit.
3. Semi truck is in the hands of multiple distributors (Walmart, Pepsico, Costco) but still not widely available.
4. Full self driving is progressing at an incredible pace. Could be the reason for cybercab unveil.
5. Cybertruck is in production but did not have complete features among other issues, major one being accelerator pedal getting stuck. Features were eventually added in an over the air update.
6. Hyperloop is dead*. Boring is drilling.
7. Neuralink has made significant progress showing patient playing video games.
8. SpaceX and Starlink are revolutionizing the space.
9. X is holding it's own for now.
Elon tried to sue them twice and lost. Their review was fair and not really deceptive. It showed a serious downside of all EVs at that time. Jeremy then did a review of the Model X on ‘The Grand Tour’ saying it was one of the few SUVs or vehicles all three of the boys liked. All scripts are written before a shoot
Oh that's why he had a team of lawyers in the car😂
What's funnier is all of the EV fires involving Tesla. It could be from the lithium-ion batteries.....or the Tesla electrical system not being able to handle the amount of energy stored in 6,750 lithium-ion batteries.
I mean, if there's the occasional battery fire from a cell phone or laptop....what does adding 6,749 more alongside it is going to do?
@@delanorrosey4730 The fires that have affected EVs like Tesla, haven’t really been from poor construction or an inability for the electrical system to handle the power delivery but, rather from major physical damage to the battery pack, typically from a collision. If a battery is damaged or punctured, this can cause the cell to overheat, triggering a chain reaction called “Thermal Runaway” that can cause a fire. A battery can degrade overtime and a poorly designed and built battery can become dangerous as it ages through use but, a well designed battery shouldn’t experience these issues unless severely damaged. The reason for having so many individual battery cells in a Tesla EV battery pack, actually helps improve safety by preventing damage to one cell from affecting others, more individual cells allows for better performance in acceleration and top speed and using multiple small cells makes for better thermal characteristics, allowing for easier cooling and space for thermal expansion during use.
you mean tv crews prepare what they do before hand and don't waste presenter's time??
no way
Their reviews are never fair, the fact that Musk lost the case doesn't make the review right. EVs were rare at the time and they pretty much ruined the ev cars reputation in the name of entertainment.
Elon hasn't got tears in his eyes, he's with Joe, he's stoned out his skull 😂😂
its this weird fucking filter lmao looks like theyre both bawlin XD
@@HappyDragneels_page Jamie pull up the tissues 😢
Bros glassy af lol
How can u even say that who gets teary eyes when theyre baked?
@@jsav6058have you ever smoked weed 🤦🏽
Top Gear officially died when Jeremy Clarkson, James May and Richard Hammond all quit when Clarkson got fired for punching the executive producer in the mouth
Good to hear
It’s Hammock btw
They’re talking about the American version u idiots
@@turolretar no its not
Didnt the producer also quit and go with them or i remember wrong?
So a world-class production left a secret script out in front of a delivery driver
Yeah.
"So a show where three guys take the piss out of cars took the piss out of a car"
Elon tried and failed to sue top gear over it though? Clarkson was smug af about it and even when he tests a newer model there a car full of lawyers poking even more fun at Elon before Clarkson calls it like it is
Doesn't add up does it
World Class?!?
What the F do you watch on TV?!?
so in passing by he glanced over the script, then read it in its entirety while nobody was looking, and then handed the car over to them anyways. Yeah right.
He was just doing what he was told
It seems like you're a musk hater when you're misrepresenting the facts. The ENGINEER handed the car over and then he saw the table. It was an engineer not Musk himself where he could've taken a decision to take the car back.
I like how you'll twist things a little to have your fill for the insatiable thirst of hate.
Ok, not once did he mention that martian piece of excrement in his comment. Doubting a story without physical evidence is not hate, and in fact, this comment section has less hate towards the martian than it does love. Folk like you are so biased toward any subject involving the martian that you can't even read and understand the message of any opposing opinion or view. And calling people "Elon haters" for simply doubting a claim without any concrete evidence is weak, old and lamentable.
@@psychopathstalkerlol so the engineer was fine with the script? Lmfao sounds like Elon just wanted attention as always.
@@psychopathstalker I am a proud musk hater :D
“And that’s why I bought Twitter.”
Nah he did that shit to get rid of the lames and Nancies lol
@@whitebocolate69 🥾👅
@@whitebocolate69 imagine Morgan Freeman narrating Earth’s demise, “That’s when Earth’s richest man bought the world’s ‘town square’, in an effort to get rid of the ‘lames and nancies’. Things couldn’t have gone smoother from there.”
Soy
Nahnahhh thats why leon edwards has the most aesthetic phyisque on the planet we call home
If I remember correctly, Tesla sued Top Gear. Top Gear won
Remember why they won?
"as any reasonable motorist knows, a manufacturer's statement about the range of a motor vehicle is always qualified by a statement as to the driving conditions under which that range may be expected."
In other words, they didn’t use the car for its intended purpose so it’s not expected to hold up
@@Chrizton only it did, the breakdown was scripted, it could've seriously hurt the brand, especially as a new company with only one model
@@ryantexada9269 it wasn't a breakdown, they had it running out of charge, it was clear in the show if you actually watched it
Honestly with teslas build quality it’s a mystery it didn’t break down
@@Patty-vo4nz more reliable than the shitty transmission in your car.
Bruh OG Top Gear literally clowned everyone, nobody was safe, everyone caught smoke lmao
Calm down kid.
@@Josh-xd9mj huh?
There is a difference between clowning and being intentionally deceitful dude.
Gen Z really knows nothing about nuance anymore. It's all either black or white lol.
@@Khaynizzle7thats actually a really ironic take.
Did you do that on purpose?
@@ICCUWANSIUT what makes it ironic? That it's a double entendre? (honest question)
"Jamie, pull up the video of a polar bear on mushrooms doing a triangle choke on Jeff Bezos."
The visuals 😂😂😂😂
So the engineer saw the script and continued the car handover...
Probably couldn’t do shit about it
Should have taken a picture of the script and refuse delivery. Could have just used the picture as proof as to why to never do business with them again
@@aimlessdrive8723blow it up and say it blew itself up?😂 That is absolutely not something they could have done and gotten away with it
In what world has Elon Musk ever told the truth about anything ?
He didnt found Tesla. He created / inventwd literally nothing in his entire life.
WTF are you people talking about ?
Its even better ads. Free publication bad or worse.
Let’s not get bogged down with who’s car breaks down
because YOU scripted ALL of it
@@ethanbenton6676so explain why Elon tried and failed to sue Clarkson? Even his appeal failed it was hard but fair review
A cultured man.
@@ethanbenton6676it’s a show, you have to script it. And it was funny. That’s all that matters.
I heard that comment in clarksons voice😂
And yet he lost twice when he tried to sue
Because it’s hard to sue a company infact be near impossible to sue and win because majority of there episodes it’s scripted and fake but then again giving a company a bad rep for a script of an episode is wrong
@@dommcguinness1012The injuries aren't fake otherwise why tf would they get injured at all?
Top gear didn't deny they lied. Their defense was that they're an entertainment show so no one would take this seriously and the judge agreed.
@@B4R0N.And anybody who watched top gear would agree too.
It’s also hard to win a lawsuit when your company releases a counter statement of “ we gave Top Gear two Tesla Roadsters to test neither of which broke down, one had a brake failure from a blown fuse, the batteries going dead is an exaggeration because the charge never got bellow 20%, the charge time was also exaggerated it doesn’t take 16 hours but 3 and a half to charge”. guess a brake failure isn’t that big of a deal.
They just predicted Tesla's most known characteristic of their future cars: Breaking down
How come he didn’t prove it in court twice
I believe he lost because topgear was not deemed a serious car review company but an entertainment company or something along those lines.
@@shiffterCL someone posted the full story as to why higher up but tldr: it was because Judge deemed the average viewer would be able to distinguish the difference between road driving and track driving
@luisdunfordgavira9730 that still doesn't make any sense. They still lied on a car breaking down giving them a bad reputation.
@@nickybrander1015 they didn’t lie. Even when you look today the most unreliable cars are teslas for the last few years 😂
@@elitex50 I know they are unreliable. I don't like electric cars and hate the fact that people believe they are better for the environment wich they aren't.
That memory almost had that boi Elon in tears lol
Deadset
Bro was just high as fuck lol
Fliter
Almost?
Bro he Was in tears
I think Elon is genuinely passionate about his work. So it's understandable.
And yet, Joe, those batteries keep combusting and are the worst things to try and put out.
Source : trust me bro
Best part is Musk sued twice
Lost twice
But he is still on the top one percent richest man in the world
What exactly happened in the lawsuit
@@CK-ec8kz there was evidence but since top gear is for entertainment all things shown don't have to be 100 percent accurate
They fake a lot to the point idk what was and wasn’t real in the show anymore. Like for the famous reliant Robin (car that flipped easily) was also fake. They installed huge weights to the one side so it would flip at 5mph. Much of it was funny, but with the expectation it was real. Even the Land Rover episode where a brand new SUV leaked water into the driver map light and started dripping, was that real?
Was this referring to the batteries getting hot and going into limp mode during track session?
bro added sad music to it
Bro did!
@@_Tuff08 Bubble Gum! By Claire Cottril❤️ really wish TH-cam would add a feature to let me link the sounds to clips. Hope this helps👍 cheers!
@@_Tuff08 no problem. Trying my best to get to all these comments❤️
LOL! Elon looks like he's tearing up as well, lmfao
@@technoplusmedia I liked it, please continue to add!
"I appreciate the support from Top Gear in recent years" Yeah that's because the agenda has changed from hating EVs to now EVs only. Fuck all to do with support
Exactly
Facts
Truth.
He should explain how he is also a fake
Your comment communicates envy, your name a fake, and that's not you in the picture.....envy is ugly
@@angru_archesElonsimp shows up
Same as rogan
@@erronblack308 true, both are fake af
@@angru_arches i doubt that is you in the picture either...
Tesla lost the case.
Jeremy Clarkson said "*On our track* the range was 51 miles." Electric cars lose heaps of range on race tracks, so a range of around 80km on a race track is entirely plausible. They knew that they would run it out of battery so they put that in the script. The car genuinely ran out of power, this was done intentionally, but it demonstrated the lack of range on a race track, which for a two seater sports car based on a Lotus (track car) is important. The review was harsh but fair, and they won the court case for a reason. Stop listening to Elon's whinging.
He only said the script already had planned the car "breaking down". He never contradicted your claims. And what a leap, the autonomy went from 80 km to 600 km
Thank you, I was wondering what the other side was.
@@ahgcomegaguardian5575 He omitted the above mentioned issues, hence painting the whole incident in his favour. Kinda intentionally misleading
I exactly remember that as I watched it long time ago; it did not break down it went out of juice and preparing a script for that is logical as that was 100% predictable
@@neatwheat the tv show didn't paint Tesla in a good light to bring more views, so why would Elon be neutral?
Engineer knew he made a mistake and had to cover 😂😂😂
Idk elon likes his baby called tesla dude almost went broke because of tesla and spacex but didn't sell a man like that would make sure the car is perfect for its first big show 😂i think crap gear is trash old men need to sleep and let next generation surpass them in silent 🤫
@@2ndAmendmentMF top gear is watched by car dudes who hate electric cars
Yeah Elon told a similar (notice not the same) story back when this happened and in 2011 the courts ruled in favour of the BBC. Guess why.
@@Testosteroneisnaturaltrump2024 car dude 😂
@@2ndAmendmentMF your just sad #getridofEVs
the breakdown was it running out of battery, hardly that bad for an electric car that does go flat
Omg no way an entertainment series used something for entertainment 😱
I guess that's why he repeatedly sued them but failed every time.
It’s hard to sue a show that in every episode does fake shit and EVERYONE knows they do. Because it’s funny.
They failed because top Gear argued that they are a entertainment show
The show has them sign waivers allowing the show to say whatever they want. Tesla made the mistake of assuming that meant the show runners were going to give honest takes (good or bad).
They were dumb to sign that waiver because these shows are NOT in the business of giving honest opinions about cars/parts. They will promote whatever products and sponsors give them the most ad revenue.
Elon is the richest man for a reason all publicity is good publicity
@@Westcoastrocksduhl
Early Top Gear was shitting on all American cars.
mainly becuase american cars of that era were shit...
That is over exaggerating. And to be fair, they dumped on french cars, british cars, Chinese cars. A car show doesn't mean hey everyone, every car ever made today is great. Everyrhing is great. Life is fluffy with bunnies and no one's feelings get hurt.
Grow a pair, its not like you designed and built every American car yourself. 🙄
Rightfully so
Rightfully so... But as the cara got better so the opioning changed
Comparing the handling of common American luxury cars of that time to sporty European cars. Yes, very true.
Hammond: *you’re kidding, right?*
clarkson is and will always be a FREAKING LEGEND
Luckily the part about the tesla breaking down was written on the cover of the script in big red writing, otherwise the car delivery guy would never have seen it 😂
I can read regular handwriting fine dk about you
@@vinayaksethu5160 next time try to deliver a pizza and read the subtitles of the TV in the living room.
Then imagine how much harder it would be to read a small line of a full script on an A4 paper, as if everything was on the front page
@@sfqm1083 he couldve seen seen up close
@@vinayaksethu5160 OR he could've not...
@@sfqm1083my guess is he was looking around and it was the title, like "omg electric Tesla breaks down in the middle of the dessert?!?!? One of us dies?!?
But none of us were there, so srsly wtf is there to fight about, there's unknown variables that could have taken place
One things Brit’s and Americans agree on is nothing can replace the og topgear
Edit: I honestly thought the original topgear was the one with Clarkson Hammond and may. Regardless it’s my childhood and it’s nostalgic
If you mean Clarkson, Hammond and May that was rebooted Top Gear. Not the original. The original show ran from the late 70s to the early 00s. Then after a short break came back in a new format. Which was awful to start with (and May wasn’t even in the first series), took ages to get going then at the end was stale and repetitive. It was past its best
@@sparky4878yeah I was going to say the exact same thing
@sparky4878 only british people remember the old top gear 😢
Everyone knows what is meant by the "original" or "old" top gear.
Such a tragedy, it's really held Elon Musk back in life.
Bruh Elon so sad about a fuckin joke
dude tried to sue top gear and lost twice 😂
Virgin Tesla: "Oh no, they scripted our car breaking down , this is so sad"
Chad Rimac: "You totaled our only prototype and burned it to a husk? Ok cool, here's your watch we have salvaged from the wreckage"
Alright, Jean.
I feel Elon failed to realize that top gear is a scripted show. It was never a serious car review show. Sending top gear a car to review is like sending a game to a polygon journalist so he can review that game
@@dankwedd_yt8197 like pimp my ride was fake. Oh they did shit to the car but they had some shady shit going on and you can look it up. Also all reality tv were scripted to make shit up and get people to fight or argue and just have drama. Like I heard with those bachelor/ett shows they get people to fight by having the camera crew or whatever getting the women to fight. It's in all those shows that people finally tell how it actually went down behind the scenes. It's all funny. I hate reality tv
A lot of people were introduced to various cars through top gear, and they clearly do take the time to review cars. They should have just had Hammond "forget to charge the car" or something, rather than defame Tesla.
@@CMKloser I mean Hammond crashed rimacs only prototype car and rimac didn’t make a big fuss
So he delivered a car, saw a script, knew what was going to happen and then let it happen. Elon not sounding so clever...
Funny enough, the Tesla actually did break down. The brakes failed, not because something was wrong with the brakes, but because the entire electrical system failed.
Forgot if how they tried to sue Clarkson… but lost twice
They're talking about u.s top gear
@@jacob9798 No, they're talking about Top Gear UK!
He tried suing them for libel and it was kicked out, then the appeal was kicked out too!
____________
An English court has once again told Tesla Motors to take a hike and dismissed the automaker's latest libel charge against the BBC, producer of the wildly popular program Top Gear.
Tesla Motors sued the BBC in March, arguing Jeremy Clarkson and his Top Gear cohorts defamed the company by claiming the Roadster achieved a paltry 55 miles of range on the show's test track. That is significantly less than the 200 miles or more Tesla claims for the car.
The program's March 2008 review of the car - which Clarkson praised for its acceleration - included a scene in which a crew is seen pushing the Roadster into a hangar for charging.
Although Tesla say it will do 200 miles we have worked out that on our track it will run out after just 55 miles and if it does run out, it is not a quick job to charge it up again," Clarkson said in commentary.
Tesla Motors CEO Elon Musk called Top Gear "completely phony" and his company sued for libel and malicious falsehoods. A judge dismissed the suit in October, saying no viewer of the program could have reasonably compared the Roadster's performance on the track to real-world performance on the street.
Tesla would not be deterred and returned to court with an amended suit.
The same judge, in a ruling handed down Thursday in London, dismissed the claim. He noted that Tesla's amendment was "not capable of being defamatory at all, or, if it is, it is not capable of being a sufficiently serious defamatory meaning to constitute a real and substantial tort," according to The Guardian.
He added that "as any reasonable motorist knows, a manufacturer's statement about the range of a motor vehicle is always qualified by a statement as to the driving conditions under which that range may be expected."
That, by the way, is a point EV advocates often espouse when explaining range.
The BBC was, as you'd expect please by the ruling. We're still waiting to hear from Tesla, and we fully expect Clarkson to say something snarky in an upcoming episode.
Source - Wired Magazine Feb 23 2012
@@robertelliott2026 that's fked up. Of course 999 out of 1000 people aren't smart enough to realize that driving on a track at high speeds is not at all the same as regular use on the road.
It was most definitely defamatory.
@@ProxCQ lol good one
@@ProxCQ anyone watching top gear, at any point in time, knows that a heavier foot, means more fuel used. Meaning most people don’t think an electric car has the same range, no matter how hard you drive it
They don't breakdown.
They blow up .
not any more than IC engines
@@superidol238IC engines dont blow up… what are u on about… its impossible
@@blocksource4192 Unless it's a Hyundai engine.
@@lightsfansofthewest481 Im only allowed to speak about german cars. I dont speak about cheap korean plastic terrorist planted bombs
I bet you never saw a video of an electric car blowing up. Only BPL cars and the video uploader saying it's electric. Electric cars never blow up.
Weird, how if they faked it, Elon did not win the TWO separate lawsuits he filed against Top Gear.
The script is just a made up story to cover up that they make awful cars.
Corrupt British court.
@@Nicole19989Nope. Elon just lies
I remember Jeremy saying he couldn’t sleep and had a very stressful period when Tesla sued them
I care more about clarkson than any other celebrity
@@OneNidim national treasure he is.
In reality, I'm 100% certain Jezza didn't give a shit and slept like a baby xDD
@@BuckledFrame2187he's actually a total bellend has-been
@@BuckledFrame2187Clarkson ain't no treasure, the guys an arrogant waste of space, hes mediocre at best
Who put a crying filter on Elon?💀💀
Edit: Ma!!!! We’re famous!!
They smoked tf out fam
Elon just has very moist eyes
The channel.
I’m not convinced. Man really does get emotional when talking bout his companies
@@DavidEscobedo-qp6mi they didn’t he never breathed it legally he can’t because of government contracts
Cenaoring Twitter: thats messed up
"Jamie, pull up the video of a bear watching Top Gear sitting in a broken down Tesla."
Jeremy Clarkson: " Sometimes my genius... breaks teslas for no reason"
The engineer looks at the table and reads the script at a glance
Yes, and full self driving was solved 6 years ago
This engineer just sees a script lying there for that exact episode that wasn't in the process of being filmed since they haven't got the car yet omegalul
This engineer has his Nuro-Link installed, bro has photo memory.
He didn't say that the engineer had read the script, just that he saw it.
You can't scan a document in a few seconds? Condolences.
The tears in his eyes when he said "it's messed up"....😢
He's stoned as hell, what did you expect
Idk who buys tesla anyway
Ah yes. The deep fry meme.
I’m sure your engineer saw the script, picked it up, and read the whole thing and reported back to you 😂 makes sense
Exactly hahaha just lying about 🤣
Without taking a picture in such a sabotage operation that was potentially faital to Tesla
You guys are dumb af
Nobody needs to say they sent a picture or showed it to them it’s just common sense in a conversation
i wouldn't be surpised if he has all his engineers be speed readers. there are those on the spectrum with photographic memory, cough cough like musk.
He saw the papers, then they watched the show …
Damn that cut Elon Deep.
At the end of the day. The car broke down!
We can never understand the intense hardship and suffering this billionaire went through 😢
@cxcxccdx he wasn't always a billionaire. He worked for it. You can too! That's the beauty of capitalism.
@@steve8803Yeah man we can all just work our way into being born into wealth. Keep licking those boots fanboy
@@mspaint93 ur so upset that he’s rich and ur not 😂😂 what do u want him to do give away his riches because he was born into wealth? That’s just stupid man we play the hand we are dealt and he played his to the tune of BILLIONS.
@@steve8803 Maybe one day I too can own an emerald mine in Africa!
Bro is mad someone made a life for themself 🤣🤣
Bless joe for thinking topgear was real.
Most of it is real, but yeah also a lot of it’s not.
Like tesla did the same with their autopilot advertising?
You do remember tesla lost the legal battles against them
@Colt thing is, once I understood that a lot was scripted, everything feels so scripted or like it could easily be scripted
@@PaganiZondaF650hp that’s understandable
Main character syndrome yap yap yap yap
Thankfully the subtitles were huge right in the middle of the screen. I don’t think I’d be able to understand what they were saying without them!
Yeah this is messed up guys, but let's not get distracted from the fact the Mr Krabbs sold SpongeBob's soul for 62 cents 😢
Not the edit trying to add tears to Elon’s eyes😂😂😂😂
so funny
Still makes you think how evil people really are, they try to break down any new competition to their business by misleading consumers, paying off public influencers to shit about opponent's products which might actually be better for the consumers and the earth.
"Could be worse" -Jeremy Clarkson
Elon is the type of guy who watches the new Top Gear
Clarkson era Top gear wasnt a show to sell your car for you, especially a very very boring one at that. Its just entertainment. They did they're best to make a slow and silent pos entertaining and it worked.
@@Mrfix-iz4di it’s very slow
@@Mrfix-iz4di if you look at 0-60 times as a judgment of speed, I’m sorry to break it to you but it’s not a good metric. Sure it’s quick up to 60 but will it handle corners as well at that speed and continue to accelerate
@@Mrfix-iz4di I drive a 350z, 0-60 times are inflated due to hybrid systems and electric systems. Speed should be measured on the mile or track. And there is no way a car that makes 250hp keeping up with a Ferrari of the same time period. Not in this universe would that be accurate
@@Mrfix-iz4di regardless of whether or not its built on a lotus chassis, they only reason it would out perform a car in ANY aspect is because its electric. hence the problem with a 0-60 time. they're all eletronically limited. you can do more research sure. but you cannot dispute facts. theres a reason f1 is a larger sport than formula E
@@Mrfix-iz4di tou trust claimed 0-60 times? Oh tou sweet summer child. Alright, jt one and aee if you can get anywhere close to 3.7 without a super sticky drag strip and a 5mph rolling start. Car wnd driver did a good segment on how they had to completely destroy the transmission in a subaru wrx sti and perform over 50 hard launches to hit the claimed number. Claimed 0-60 is a fairytale. Tesla still lie about their 0-60 times today
In top gears defence, they were really using it more to show what WOULD happen if you were an idiot and didnt keep your car charged. But it got changed in the cut to seem like they didnt even know it was low
Finally the comment i was looking for 😂 some people genuinely believe topgear scripted it to make tesla look bad
Dude has tears of pure rage in his eyes
Same story goes for Rover, they took the piss on purpose and clarkson was a pretty huge impact on the brand partially causing Bankrupt besides John Towers steaking money from them.
My respect for Jeremy 📈📈📈
But top gear won the law suit 2x
Agreements like to hold in court, no matter of the circumstances, still kinda ducked tho to do that to small company, but im sure they didn’t mean to hurt the brand, just have a laugh.
@@Denward00 they do it to every car company, it’s not like they singled out tesla. They were doing a bit
They won the case. Doesn't change the fact that that was a dickish thing to do
Joe looks greasy! 🤢
@@randomlyfactual1943 it was entirely factual though, the car would run out of charge in less than 60 miles if driven hard the whole time. They also said it was lightning quick and a lot of fun. They just pointed out the other side of the coin in an entertaining manner, as they always do. How's that a dickish thing to do?
Then Clarkson does a video with Model X with 5 fake lawyers inside 😂
Clarkson was pouring salt in Elons wounds 🤣
Never try to sue the three who can’t get cancelled
Elon tearing up as he explains how Top Gear tried to hurt his brand. Sad.
Joe tearing up when he asks Elon what they did with his car. Sad.
I wonder if someone paid them to do it. That's how it goes most of the time with shady stuff like this.
He loves his company and if you think about how much of your life gets poured into making a electric car that's reliable that hurts granted theres kinks such as extreme cold weather but they are finding ways to fix it and that's awesome
Filters people
His companies are his babies
What is the background song?
Bubble Gum · Clairo
@@Mike-yz6oothank you
Didn't Elon lose that case?
This guy just never stops lying.
He lost twice 🤣
why did they show pictures of a Lotus? 😭
Context:
1. the scripted part of top gear is lines they use for the studio shoots.
2. They literally won an Emmy for being mostly unscripted.
3. The engineers claim obviously has some lack of context. Why would you be inside the production office to hand the keys when that could just happen outside on track when the tesla mechanics are having it prepped and if there was scripts that say that the question is: why? And if true why would they leave that in the open for non BBC 2 employees to see.
4. And if I'm wrong, then why did tesla lose the lawsuit?
5. The engineer probably forgot that him seeing scripts where when he was retrieving the keys post review and they could have been newly updated scripts.
You could have done a bit of research instead of literally asking a question you didn't know the answer to
"A judge dismissed the suit in October, saying no viewer of the program could have reasonably compared the Roadster's performance on the track to real-world performance on the street."
So basically they got away with it because the staged breakdown happens on a track and viewers couldn't possibly be so stupid to think that Just because it breaks down on a track doesn't mean it breaks down on the streets
This honestly feels like big company versus small company and Tesla grew the short straw and must have not paid the lawyers enough compared to how much BBC paid
Don't post context if you don't have context
Or at least do some research before claiming you do
Also they were most likely giving the keys to the production manager and even if they weren't, scripts aren't secret (especially for a show about cars with little to know spoilable stuff I'm like shows Like The walking Dead where non-disclosure is important) most of the time they will be lying around
Edit: Also top gear's not the only people to lie about electric cars they're just the most popular to lie about electric cars
If I'm correct this whole incident is why Tesla installs tracking devices in review cars because there was also a reviewer that literally drove in circles for hours and hours in a parking lot just so that he can say his car ran out of battery out of nowhere with no warning even though it warns him multiple times and even gave him enough battery to go to the nearest charge station even though it was at zero percent
But he still wanted to drain the battery so he ignored all of them
@@punnup3452 lawyers dont make decisions they make cases. Unless you think BBC paid an entire jury
@@punnup3452 “ 1. We never said that the Tesla's true range is only 55 miles, as opposed to their own claim of 211 or that it had actually ran out of charge. In the film our actual words were: "We calculated that on our track it would run out after 55 miles." The first point here is that the track is where we do our tests of sports cars and supercars, as has happened ever since Top Gear existed. This is where cars are driven fast , and since Tesla calls its roadster "The Supercar. Redefined" it seemed pretty logical to us that the right test was a track test. The second point is that the figure of 55 miles came not from our heads, but from Tesla. They looked at the data from that car and calculated that, driven hard on our track, it would have a range of 55 miles.
2. We never said that the Tesla was completely immobilized as a result of the motor overheating. We said the car had "reduced power." This was true.
3. Tesla claims we were lying when we said the brakes were "broken". They now say that all that had happened was that the fuse to the vacuum pump had failed, which meant that the brake just had to be pushed down much harder than usual. Well, to my mind, if the brakes are broken, then they're broken, and if this happened to your car, you'd take it to the garage to get it fixed. Odd it seems so trivial to Tesla now, because on the day of filming they insisted on repairing the fuse before we could carry on driving the car. ”
@@aaronsams8605 Okay but all that really says is that they didn't legally say anything was wrong So they can't take legal action but the show is still dishonest with how they're portraying the information and not explaining vital information like how the brakes were broken because if I heard the brakes were broken I would be scared I would not assume "Oh that just means the brakes required a tiny bit more force, It's completely safe"
But I would also like to mention again that the judge was on the side of top gear because they believed no consumer would possibly consider top gear a reliable source of car reviews
And if you're like me you will see the problem with that very quickly as yes consumers are fucking retarded and Would 100% take the advice of a show that is not meant for actual reliable information
If you can’t see how scripted top gear is there’s nothing that can be done for you
A quick reminder that its only alleged and elon actually lost in the court of law.
A quick reminder that he lost in British courts as an American company
@@keenb3041 good.
And OJ was proven innocent
@@keenb3041 A British company was being sued. Do you seriously think UK courts have it out for Americans for no reason? I actually believe Elon because TV people are usually dicks, but your argument is retarded
@@keenb3041 they lost cuz they onlu had anecdotal evidence. Whole lawsuit was build on the story that one tesla engineer (who was supposed to make sure the car runs btw) saw a page of the script
"I was disgusted" really trying to suck up to him lmao
The sad music in this is so weird, like I should feel bad for the soulless billionaire after the funny car men made fun of his car lol
Not forget, Elon did not start Tesla, he bought it. Now humour me
He was the only investor for a while.
... And?
"We were just a little company" acting like he didn't buy it
@@talonapex9775 okay... But you can buy companies when they are little.
how many companies do u own?
Around last Christmas in the UK, there were long queues of teslas trying to charge, but the tesla chargers were broken. Queue was about 20+ hours long.
I miss the old Top Gear.
Elon: It’s messed up!
Jeremy: Oh no, anyways…
Now it makes me think if the fire in that danish sportscar was made up too..
Another short with zero comments but there is plenty of people chatting youtube is no better than the discussion these two gents are having
I thought I was nuts
It always happens
End of stupid comment.
British humor is a wonderful thing ain't it.
Sarcasm, dry & what not be common place.
That isnt sarcasm though.
@@lio1234234
If by not you mean to say,
That for them to convey as a joke the car indeed failed on them when in truth it did not.
Then yes you & I are in agreement.
For you see, sarcasm is to say or express the opposite in hopes to be funny, to insult someone or to show irritation.
Thus this would be sarcasm with a hint of good ol' dry British humor.
@@lorde0147 no its just fraud and lies. i remember that episode well, that bit wasn't even funny and they were ripping into tesla. im not a tesla fan but defamation and trying to destroy a company reputation for a "joke" isnt sarcasm. i like top gear but blindly defending this is not a good look
@@RobertoDelTaco
You are most assuredly allowed to think that, but just because you don't find a joke funny doesn't change that it was a joke.
That ain't sarcasm bruh... That's white privilege getting bored and farking with people's livelihood and dreams.
No wonder why Joe became the host of Fear Factor.
He was the fear.
Top gear doesn't do do any script writing. It is mentioned multiple times by the BBC.
Truly a tragic event, thoughts and prayers to the tesla battery packs🙏
Truly a tragic fact you cant afford them 🙏
@@marke.8668 salty?
@@marke.8668 😂 ur broke and a weeb double trouble
@@marke.8668its just an american shitbox. Its not a Taycan or a 911, just a Tesla
Hard work pays for itself bro2
No the slaves er I mean workers in the emerald mine payed for it
Bro2? Tf
@@unknownsubject3290 What does emerald have to do with teslas… If you said cobalt mines sure but your just plain dumb.
Bro2? Wtf does that mean?
hard work? elon bought tesla and payed workers with daddy's emerald mine money.
This is why I only watch British top gear
I would also write a script of microwave failure
I also got disgusted when Musk lied about his car's self driving abilities and killed a bunch of people. 😢
Too be fair you kinda have too agree that autopilot is not meant to be used unless you are fully alert and have a hand on the wheel lol not his fault
@@jtm9945 die sicherheitsvorkehrungen dass man die Hände auf dem Lenkrad haben muss und wachsam sein muss sind aber erst kürzlich hinzugekommen. Früher war das vollkommen egal zumal er aber auch dafür verantwortlich war, dass dieser "Autopilot" auch als autopilot vermarktet wurde. Und wenn man dann halt weiß dass es eigentlich keinen autopilot ist, darf man es halt auch schlicht und ergreifend nicht als autopilot vermarkten. Selbstverständlich hatten die Leute mal ihren Schädel einschalten können und sich denken können dass es kein autonomes fahren gibt, aber man hätte es auch nicht auf solch eine Art und weise herausreizen müssen. Beispielsweise hat er genau wegen dieser Sachlage nicht mehr das Recht in Deutschland mit autopilot zu werben.
@@jtm9945 Bith the legal system and pretty much everyone with a functioning frontal lobe disagree with you.
@@jtm9945 he claimed that its fully autonomous back in 2018. He constantly lies. Also thats not the only issue read about how auto pilot turns of seconds before crash so tesla doesn’t get any liability for its wrong decisions
@@skyfox585 so thats why every case where people claim it was aps fault they lose the case because evidence shows ot was human error ? It clearly states in the agreement you accept when entering you car the first time at you are reaponsible. Ots not level 5 . Its level 2 to level 3 automony driving . Though i might say the naming is its biggest problem because people dont see the last wprd afterwards . " Fully selfdrive Capability "
Elon sued top gear and lost.
The break down wasnt “scripted”, it really did break down
the lawsuit was lost because tesla couldn't proove that they lost sales because of top gear
BBC themself admitted it was faked
As expected for an electric abomination
His story is BS too, "oh when my 1 guy was there, he saw on the table as he walked past a script that happened to be open and just glanced at that one line" Yeah it is "messed up" Elon.
And what's madder than people believing him is that most of the commenters can't see the difference between visual effects on baked eyes vs tears, because people think they see the latter.
@@sugma69420
Keep crying lmfao
Lmao he lost because he sued for defamation and the judge ruled that it wouldn’t effect car sales. Do some research idiot
My shop is at Sears Point Raceway and I remember when Tesla brought that little red sports car to the drag strip and there was a buzz around the track about this electric car that was ripping down the track! It was definitely a site to see, you have to remember that this is way before Tesla was even a name that anyone knew!
Is that why you sued and failed? lol
The Hog Rider is a fast ground troop with medium hit points, low damage, and the ability to jump over enemy Walls. He is unlocked at level 2 Dark Barracks.
The Hog Rider (person) is a bare-chested dark-skinned man holding a hammer. He has a Mohawk, wears a brown leather loincloth, a red belt, and a pair of leather sandals, as well as two large golden wristbands and a gold earring.
His ride is a large hog, about half his height. It has a brown leather bridle looped around its tusks, which in turn is held by the Hog Rider.
Hog Riders prioritize defensive structures above all other targets, and will bypass all other types of enemy buildings and troops while any defenses remain on the battlefield. This is true even if they are under attack by enemy Clan Castle troops, heroes or Skeleton Trap skeletons. Note that like all troops that prioritize defenses, Hog Riders do not consider the Clan Castle to be a defense regardless of whether or not it contains enemy troops, but do consider the defending Grand Warden and the activated Town Hall weapon (if any) to be defensive buildings.
Once all defenses are destroyed, Hog Riders become like any other troop with no preferred target; they will attack the nearest building to them regardless of type, and will turn and attack enemy units if they become aware of any nearby and can fight back against them. However, they will not switch targets to enemy units until their previous target was destroyed.
Hog riderrrrrrr!!
Hawg riiiideerrrr
HOG RIDAAAAAAHHHHH
Hog riderrrree
rog hiderrrrrr