I have the same Amarok only mine is manuel.Drives like a dream and no problems, I know a ton of people who trade in there ranger because of gearbox / turbo problems most of them if youre lucky reach 50 000 k's and what does ford do? RELACE the part and give you a 20 000 km warranty ??WTF they dont eaven trust there own product.
This test shows acceleration wich is clearly not the confort zone of the ranger with its long stroke 3.2L pushing 200cv at only 3000rpm and its lazy auto gearbox. However these are 2 very differents vehicles and despite VW high reving 2.0 twin turbo and 8 speed gearbox well performing on acceleration, put 1 ton in the tray and a 3500kgs+ trailer to the amarok and let see how (long) the 2.0 engine live. Ranger 3.2 is a true workhorse with torquey engine at low RPM, able to tow easily and for years...and that's what we ask to them.that's may be one of the reasons why it sells 20 times better than the "beach cruisin" Amarok :) (which is a great pick up too !)
Have a 3.2 BT 50 overheats pulling a caravan at average speed, general build quality is SHIT to say the least!, had an amarok towing at 140+ never had trouble overheating and less effort towing at higher speed. Buying an amarok again ASAP!!
The mazda only has 50000km and it's giving problems,gearbox is very slow and not close to the comfort as newer auto boxes. The engine also totally under performs for a 3.2. A new age 3.0 engine should generate around 180-200 kw if compared to engines of German manufacturers. the build quality of the mazda is cheap plastic finishes, the rear doors of the freestyle cab has to be hit exceptionally hard just to close. The ranger is not a bad bakkie, the wild track looks great, but overall quality is just not up to scratch with the Germans. Do yourself a favour and drive the auto vw and you can decide. It is only n 2liter and performs better but still close to a 3.2 ranger. Our amarok had 130000km it was a manual and the only issue is that the gearbox is notchy and it's just shit overall that is the only complaint that I have....! The amarok towed my caravan at high speeds and feals more stable on the road, in corners. The electronic stability control is smooth and precise. But at the end it is all down to taste but I am just not at all levels happy with the mazda...another thing is I naught my vw for 330000 with 16000km on the clock, it was not a bad price, after 2 years and selling it at 130000km I still got R280000 as a trade in, driving the mazda now for a year paid R370000 for it was offered R240000 for it with around 40000km on the clock.
Dont have gearbox problems, the auto box is just slow and notchy. As with an amarok manual. Only have overheating problems, but it is when towing a bit harsh....but still you dont want such problems on any new car. I drive high performance cars all the time and i have never had a car overheating when driving or playing a bit to hard. It just doesnt happen with new cars. It will flash when you loose grip or when you pull away to fast it is just an indication that it is working and thatvthe vehicle is loosing grip...but ut can be completely turned off by just pressing a button.
Please go do that, I test drove one 2 weeks ago and it was amazingly comfy, it is only a 2 liter and still a bakkie and not a 3.0 so you shouldn't expect it to out perform other bakkie by miles in a performance perspective, but it is overall a very very refined vehicle. Do yourself the favour and just test it. I would love to hear your feedback....
Hilux would loose sorry to say, the 3L diesel is old and outgunned by pretty much everything in it's class, Toyota can afford to get away with it as they rely on brand perception. You only have to drive the two, and the Hilux is notably slower
The best pickup isn't the quickest or the one each owner thinks is the best, but simply the best selling one... Do u think Ford cares about acceleration performance when it sells 10 ranger for each Amarok? 😆
Ansett76 When Ford launched the current ranger in 2013, it won the Internation pick--up truck award beating the second place Isuzu D Max and third placed vw Amarok..
haloaum so what? When the Amok was released in 2010 it was crowned the International Pick Up Award less then a year later in 2011. There are many 4x4 awards handed to the Amarok, it won 4x4 Ute of the year here in Australia TWICE, many reviews have said it was equal to or better then the Ranger, mainly due to its more advanced engine, better handling and better fuel economy. Whilst the D-Max is a good ute, its looks, fuel economy, outdated interior and inferior handling let it down.
I always drove ls1 motor Utes.. Fast yeah but around work sites useless.. Fell in love with the ranger then a mate brought a v6 twin turbo Nissan d40 it was beating all the Rangers .. My mates d 40 was tuned tho ... Then he come up against another mate in his amarock.. Stock.. Was beating this d40 .. Couldn't believe my eyes.. This vid is accurate.. And I'm buying a rock.. Even tho I agree with what people say they won't last 20 years but I only keep mine for 7 so time will tell I guess
pues parece notar la ventaja de VW sobre Ford, a pesar de todo VW es nuevo en esta categoria de las pick up´s mientras que ford desde siempre a estado fabricando este ssegmento, así que, es cierto que es un poco controversial. A pesar de todo, algo que es nuevo no significa que sea malo, es igual que como cualquier otra innovación, que si es mejor, desplazará a su competencia. Ejemplos de esto se ve en cualquier mercado, como la baja de Nintendo ante Microsoft, nintendo tiene años en el mercado mientras que la xbox es más nueva, y con sus innovaciones sobrepaso a la nintendo en diferentes aspectos, que paso con Nokia? es lo mismo! Es algo que nunca permanece estable, es la Innovación y la competencia. La cuestión en muchas personas es fanatismo más que otra cosa, y está bien, cada quién es libre de elegir lo que que desee. En muchas ocaciones nos aferramos a algo y, a pesar de que no sea lo mejor, nuestro afán sobre ello nos hará elegirlo una y otra vez.
its the 8 speed auto and gear ratio that make the difference thats why the ford got beaten would like to see tug of war to see how strong the amarok is in low range then you will see
I had a amarok and traded it in for a 3.2L xlt ranger . This has to be a joke the ford pulls way better than amarok and when u put weight in the back it doesnt feel like its sliding all over the place like a amarok
Pitty it couldn't make the Voetspore Cape to Cairo trip without catastrophic failure. Even after VW flew in an engineer they couldn't fix it. Had to be brought back to SA on the back of a flatbed??
Where did you hear that? The tech from VW got it fixed and they finished the trip with it. There after they had done two more trips with Amararoks trouble free. Go read up on all the ford problems on the net.
So they're drag racing two vehicles that aren't even slightly made to? I was hoping for a descent comparison! To everyone slating the Ranger, it's won against the Amarok in nearly every REAL comparison out there by the big brand critics. As for the 2.0 Diesel out performing the 3.2 Diesel, if you listen the Amarok has an 8 speed box, nice short ratios so quicker on acceleration, the Ranger has a six speed box so by default the gears are longer. I think they're both a massive step ahead of any other Truck available (in the UK anyway) but the Ford is the one to have if you're actually going to use it for purpose.
it matters to some, as people buy these, like myself as an allrounder, and still want to actually overtake when you hit the bitumen. The 8 speed is efficient and smooth and mine does a great job in the bush....even better in the sand.
Jandre le Roux wow, that should be given to the FBI or Interpol for investigation as that would be something involving extra terrestrial involvement with technology added to the 'Lux that is unworldly. That old 3L has more then grey hairs now.
On the country side of Brazil, Amarok is a joke. We only see Hilux, S10, and now the New Ranger is showing even more. But, volks... sorry, to be credible you should proof that the driver on the ranger was really trying. And, the 4x4 traction on the ranger is heavy duty, you could haul a trailer all day for months to come. On the poor Amarok it would last some hours then explode in a marvelous pyrotechnic show...
Janee fok a ranger is the most unreliable vehicle just look at the secondhand value compared to hilux and amarok That should tell you what you need to know
+Liam McCallion not sure what you mean .. Any Google search will tell you that.. All the good Utes are built in 3rd world places..keeps cost down for the consumer and profits up for the company's.. Cars Are built better now then ever.. Unless you are buying Chinese rubbish then you are sweet... Everyone demands leading edge technology these days and company's do a damn good job at providing that... Hilux is the standard that's obvious but not everyone wants to drive a lux . So you are left with the rest.. I think the ammorock is on par with the rest that 8 speed real shows what is going to be the future.. I would be happy with ether of these cars in my shed
Es verdad, te subís a una Amarok...la probás, después te subís a una Ranger 3.2 y la Amarok es un cajón de manzana con 4 rodamientos...re preparado el vídeo.
Why not just get a GTI and try to kick the other hot hatches asses?? Ok granted, its interesting to see how an engine producing less power and torque can put the power down like the Amarok does. I don't prefer either of the 2 but this video is not going to make me choose one or the other if was in the market for a double cab bakkie. Bragging rights for some maybe? To me it's pretty pointless I will admit
All this overheating... im glad i have a hilux. Ive even chipped it by sacs its performance is better than any of those two(even though i must admit ive lost recently to a 8 speed amarok also tuned it just takes off faster) i was scared with the chip but im in construction and im always towing generators. Compressors water bowser etc etc. Its never given hassle has 78k on the clock. Bought it in 2012 new.. go see my video of it accelerating.. i must admit with all the torque the clutch seems like it wont last long..
You apparently haven't heard that the amarok chassis is by far the strongest in this class if cars. It has multiple reinforcements underneath, making it very stiff and strong. And yet ranger is 500 kg heavier! Go figure!
I am of the opinion that the Ford's disappointing performance is MOST LIKELY due to the ALTITUDE at which this test was performed. I know for a fact that the "latest" Ford ECU software DETUNES the engine as a function of barometric pressure to protect the turbo from overspinning and eventually self destructing (warranty). I have seen (with ELM327 BT dongle and Torque app) that at sea level the Ford boosts 1.45bar but from 500m above sea level, it starts to detune itself and when it gets to 1000m above sea level, the turbo will only boost 1.15bar. This reduced boost MUST be accompanied by reduced fuelling in order to keep EGTs within requirements which then translates into reduced engine power. Thus, from 1000m above sea level the engine produces MUCH LESS than 147kW and 470Nm torque. Therefore, I firmly believe that if this same test was to be conducted at sea level, the results MIGHT be different.
The music!!!! What. The. Hell. I was expecting to hear roaring Diesel engines, and tires shedding up the gravel. But no. What we got was the most inappropriate soundtrack I think I will ever hear. Producers of this video, you have fail today. And I am devastated.
+s1914 Of course, all utes have leaf springs. Because they are meant to be a workhorse to carry tons of loads. Only leaf springs can handle that for durability reason.
+s1914 I laughed at your comment, this is the big issue with having coils in the back, it then is no longer a real workhorse as it cannot carry as much as leaf. Even with leaf springs, the Amaroks suspension is superior on and off road to the rest.
This Video broke a lot of hearts! Poor Ranger fans.
Sifiso Mahlangu what broke my heart was the horrendously inappropriate music being player over the sound of two racing bakkies!
I would mind having the Ranger but it's a lot more expensive than Amarok
Im not a VW fan at all, but man that Amarok is impressive. The only VW that would make me want to buy one
Amazing... I'm sold! Thanks for going to the trouble of running this test, and also posting it.
no hay como la amarok.....confort, seguridad, potencia con su motor 2.0
I had two amarok, and now a ranger, but the truth is the best amarok pick up in its segment just that hold greetings amarok
Both are very nice, but the Amarok interior ( radio,wheels, shift ) is more awesome.
I have the same Amarok only mine is manuel.Drives like a dream and no problems, I know a ton of people who trade in there ranger because of gearbox / turbo problems most of them if youre lucky reach 50 000 k's and what does ford do?
RELACE the part and give you a 20 000 km warranty ??WTF they dont eaven trust there own product.
Was die Ranger in 4x4 high range? The Amarok has permanent 4wheel drives that gives it a big advantage on dirt.
Both cars have the same drivetrain settings. They are rwd in basic setting unless you select 4x4 or 4x4 low range
@@kize32 correct
This test shows acceleration wich is clearly not the confort zone of the ranger with its long stroke 3.2L pushing 200cv at only 3000rpm and its lazy auto gearbox. However these are 2 very differents vehicles and despite VW high reving 2.0 twin turbo and 8 speed gearbox well performing on acceleration, put 1 ton in the tray and a 3500kgs+ trailer to the amarok and let see how (long) the 2.0 engine live. Ranger 3.2 is a true workhorse with torquey engine at low RPM, able to tow easily and for years...and that's what we ask to them.that's may be one of the reasons why it sells 20 times better than the "beach cruisin" Amarok :) (which is a great pick up too !)
Have a 3.2 BT 50 overheats pulling a caravan at average speed, general build quality is SHIT to say the least!, had an amarok towing at 140+ never had trouble overheating and less effort towing at higher speed. Buying an amarok again ASAP!!
The mazda only has 50000km and it's giving problems,gearbox is very slow and not close to the comfort as newer auto boxes. The engine also totally under performs for a 3.2. A new age 3.0 engine should generate around 180-200 kw if compared to engines of German manufacturers. the build quality of the mazda is cheap plastic finishes, the rear doors of the freestyle cab has to be hit exceptionally hard just to close. The ranger is not a bad bakkie, the wild track looks great, but overall quality is just not up to scratch with the Germans. Do yourself a favour and drive the auto vw and you can decide. It is only n 2liter and performs better but still close to a 3.2 ranger. Our amarok had 130000km it was a manual and the only issue is that the gearbox is notchy and it's just shit overall that is the only complaint that I have....! The amarok towed my caravan at high speeds and feals more stable on the road, in corners. The electronic stability control is smooth and precise. But at the end it is all down to taste but I am just not at all levels happy with the mazda...another thing is I naught my vw for 330000 with 16000km on the clock, it was not a bad price, after 2 years and selling it at 130000km I still got R280000 as a trade in, driving the mazda now for a year paid R370000 for it was offered R240000 for it with around 40000km on the clock.
Dont have gearbox problems, the auto box is just slow and notchy. As with an amarok manual. Only have overheating problems, but it is when towing a bit harsh....but still you dont want such problems on any new car. I drive high performance cars all the time and i have never had a car overheating when driving or playing a bit to hard. It just doesnt happen with new cars. It will flash when you loose grip or when you pull away to fast it is just an indication that it is working and thatvthe vehicle is loosing grip...but ut can be completely turned off by just pressing a button.
Please go do that, I test drove one 2 weeks ago and it was amazingly comfy, it is only a 2 liter and still a bakkie and not a 3.0 so you shouldn't expect it to out perform other bakkie by miles in a performance perspective, but it is overall a very very refined vehicle. Do yourself the favour and just test it. I would love to hear your feedback....
The Amarok is 10x better in every way than any truck out there, Germans know how to build cars
AMAROK is one beautiful car! wow
Please do the same test with the Amarok and the Hilux. Now that would be something to see!
Hilux would loose sorry to say, the 3L diesel is old and outgunned by pretty much everything in it's class, Toyota can afford to get away with it as they rely on brand perception. You only have to drive the two, and the Hilux is notably slower
Have a look at Bakkie Wars II
The best pickup isn't the quickest or the one each owner thinks is the best, but simply the best selling one... Do u think Ford cares about acceleration performance when it sells 10 ranger for each Amarok? 😆
hardly proof that it's a better car, simply means Ford has had longer at it.
Ansett76 When Ford launched the current ranger in 2013, it won the Internation pick--up truck award beating the second place Isuzu D Max and third placed vw Amarok..
haloaum so what? When the Amok was released in 2010 it was crowned the International Pick Up Award less then a year later in 2011. There are many 4x4 awards handed to the Amarok, it won 4x4 Ute of the year here in Australia TWICE, many reviews have said it was equal to or better then the Ranger, mainly due to its more advanced engine, better handling and better fuel economy. Whilst the D-Max is a good ute, its looks, fuel economy, outdated interior and inferior handling let it down.
amarok may have won before new Ranger was released but current Ford Ranger won against the current VW amarok.
haloaum so? It proves they are both good vehicles, the Amarok more so in my opinion.
I always drove ls1 motor Utes.. Fast yeah but around work sites useless.. Fell in love with the ranger then a mate brought a v6 twin turbo Nissan d40 it was beating all the Rangers .. My mates d 40 was tuned tho ... Then he come up against another mate in his amarock.. Stock.. Was beating this d40 .. Couldn't believe my eyes.. This vid is accurate.. And I'm buying a rock.. Even tho I agree with what people say they won't last 20 years but I only keep mine for 7 so time will tell I guess
pues parece notar la ventaja de VW sobre Ford, a pesar de todo VW es nuevo en esta categoria de las pick up´s mientras que ford desde siempre a estado fabricando este ssegmento, así que, es cierto que es un poco controversial. A pesar de todo, algo que es nuevo no significa que sea malo, es igual que como cualquier otra innovación, que si es mejor, desplazará a su competencia. Ejemplos de esto se ve en cualquier mercado, como la baja de Nintendo ante Microsoft, nintendo tiene años en el mercado mientras que la xbox es más nueva, y con sus innovaciones sobrepaso a la nintendo en diferentes aspectos, que paso con Nokia? es lo mismo! Es algo que nunca permanece estable, es la Innovación y la competencia. La cuestión en muchas personas es fanatismo más que otra cosa, y está bien, cada quién es libre de elegir lo que que desee. En muchas ocaciones nos aferramos a algo y, a pesar de que no sea lo mejor, nuestro afán sobre ello nos hará elegirlo una y otra vez.
would like to see the hilux legend45 vs ranger wildtrack manaul
Give the ranger to someone who can actualy drive it and the difference will be seen.
both automatic vehicles, driver has no influence, put your foot down and go!! Amabaas
Juan Verster There is a video of the same test from inside the vehicle, Ford got a head start and result is the same.....
Riaan Grobler Yes I know I saw the video. Amarok is king
Why do you not drive your Ford?
its the 8 speed auto and gear ratio that make the difference thats why the ford got beaten would like to see tug of war to see how strong the amarok is in low range then you will see
Got to get out the conversion calculator
I had a amarok and traded it in for a 3.2L xlt ranger . This has to be a joke the ford pulls way better than amarok and when u put weight in the back it doesnt feel like its sliding all over the place like a amarok
Amarok is from Argentina and Ranger is from USA?
Pitty it couldn't make the Voetspore Cape to Cairo trip without catastrophic failure. Even after VW flew in an engineer they couldn't fix it. Had to be brought back to SA on the back of a flatbed??
Where did you hear that?
The tech from VW got it fixed and they finished the trip with it. There after they had done two more trips with Amararoks trouble free. Go read up on all the ford problems on the net.
Che no se pongan mal los fan boy de Ford y todavía queda la amarok v6 por si necesitan más.....jajajaj
One is a really nice pick-up
I wish we could have the amarok here in the USA fuckin politics and VW for not bringing this truck.
Quando a concorrência criar uma camionete pra comparar com a Amarok alguém me chama
There is one thing , the Amarok engine smoke at mid of kms tham Ranger...kkk
So they're drag racing two vehicles that aren't even slightly made to? I was hoping for a descent comparison! To everyone slating the Ranger, it's won against the Amarok in nearly every REAL comparison out there by the big brand critics. As for the 2.0 Diesel out performing the 3.2 Diesel, if you listen the Amarok has an 8 speed box, nice short ratios so quicker on acceleration, the Ranger has a six speed box so by default the gears are longer. I think they're both a massive step ahead of any other Truck available (in the UK anyway) but the Ford is the one to have if you're actually going to use it for purpose.
Yeah no joke - they drag-raced two commercial vehicles. The comparison is definitely not the true reflection of the intended purpose.
it matters to some, as people buy these, like myself as an allrounder, and still want to actually overtake when you hit the bitumen. The 8 speed is efficient and smooth and mine does a great job in the bush....even better in the sand.
Thats why Amarok has 8 gears. Better German technology than 6 gears
DD - - hahahaha sounds like a sore loser to me... LOOOSER
Dubbl
try reverse the amarok in a little bit of soft sand with that on the back.
taryn mcintosh 100% right mate. reverse is shiiiiiiit in rok
Sour grapes 🍇
Agreed but with a tune up/remapping in reverse gear it fixes that problem... but it is bad before you do this.
Amarok la mejor. Una belleza
la Ranger no es 3.2, es una 2.2, dejen de mentir.
Was hulle handrat of outomaties???
al twee Auto...
After watching the first race, whats the point, the amarok is obviously quicker, adding weight dont really matter. but go on....
take a look at the rest on MotorTalk.CO.ZA..Bakke warrs III
Crap should of bought an Amarok
VW brilliant
Tenho uma amorokk
If Humiliation was a video
Amarok vs Triton
As the weight increases the gap between the two cars shortens. If it went further in weight lets say 3 tonnes or more ranger would be the winner.
That really shocking waste off time getting a 3.2
I saw a video on youtube where the Hilux (3.0) beaten the hell out of the Amarok
Jandre le Roux wow, that should be given to the FBI or Interpol for investigation as that would be something involving extra terrestrial involvement with technology added to the 'Lux that is unworldly. That old 3L has more then grey hairs now.
TDI is superior in every way
On the country side of Brazil, Amarok is a joke.
We only see Hilux, S10, and now the New Ranger is showing even more.
But, volks... sorry, to be credible you should proof that the driver on the ranger was really trying.
And, the 4x4 traction on the ranger is heavy duty, you could haul a trailer all day for months to come. On the poor Amarok it would last some hours then explode in a marvelous pyrotechnic show...
Nice kak you are speaking!
ryche rising hahahahahahahahahahahaaahhaha jy gorrel net kak my maat
Haha very well said
Ranger would have gone through many engines by then.
Janee fok a ranger is the most unreliable vehicle just look at the secondhand value compared to hilux and amarok That should tell you what you need to know
Amarok is from Argentina
So ranger is from Thailand
+Liam McCallion not sure what you mean .. Any Google search will tell you that.. All the good Utes are built in 3rd world places..keeps cost down for the consumer and profits up for the company's.. Cars Are built better now then ever.. Unless you are buying Chinese rubbish then you are sweet... Everyone demands leading edge technology these days and company's do a damn good job at providing that... Hilux is the standard that's obvious but not everyone wants to drive a lux . So you are left with the rest.. I think the ammorock is on par with the rest that 8 speed real shows what is going to be the future.. I would be happy with ether of these cars in my shed
Que paso con ese 3.2?
Y asi se creen correlones en carretera.
Amarok siempre ira adelante, y para los que quieren mas esta la V6
Espetáculo...
For 2022/23 model..amarok will based on ranger 2022 platform.....ford does it better
el conductor no esta acelerando como debe ser a la ford el unico que acelera es la amarok... no estoy de acuerdo...
Juan Andre G. Champi jajajajajajajajajajajajajajaja jajajajajajajajajajajajajajaja jajajajajaja contaté otro....
Es verdad, te subís a una Amarok...la probás, después te subís a una Ranger 3.2 y la Amarok es un cajón de manzana con 4 rodamientos...re preparado el vídeo.
Why not just get a GTI and try to kick the other hot hatches asses?? Ok granted, its interesting to see how an engine producing less power and torque can put the power down like the Amarok does. I don't prefer either of the 2 but this video is not going to make me choose one or the other if was in the market for a double cab bakkie. Bragging rights for some maybe? To me it's pretty pointless I will admit
Che la AMAROK ventea a los 50.000 km ,si te agarra un rastrojero te saca a pasear , todo vw se rompe se funde se recalienta , al menos en estas pampas
Poly Polsa uuuu mira que loco la mía debe ser la única que salió buena.....tiene 200000 km ya y ni un problema.....todo hecho en campo!!!!
@@franlisi la mia 312000 de fabrica y a fondo, ultimo viaje 6600 klm sin levantar el capot
vocês são um bando de mentiroso arranja mais forte do que a Amarok possui está diminuindo a velocidade dela
So long am moving from point A to B.
Andre het geweet Hy Kom wen
Gaan kyk gerus Bakkie Bars IIII
Amarok é volks. sai ford nem cm mortor melhor n aguenta
The Ranger is better no matter what this video has on it.
All this overheating... im glad i have a hilux. Ive even chipped it by sacs its performance is better than any of those two(even though i must admit ive lost recently to a 8 speed amarok also tuned it just takes off faster) i was scared with the chip but im in construction and im always towing generators. Compressors water bowser etc etc. Its never given hassle has 78k on the clock. Bought it in 2012 new.. go see my video of it accelerating.. i must admit with all the torque the clutch seems like it wont last long..
Mój szef ma Hiluxa 2022, to auto to po prostu dramat.Ma najechane zaledwie 32.000 km a już był 4 razy w serwisie.
This video is more than a fake!! hahahahaha this is ridiculous! what a bad marketing for amarok :/
Marlon Valle what a bad comment, are you 8yrs old?
Its real..... Amarok Star
Marlon Valle the pick up ford is better than amarok, this video is only maketing for amarok... hahaha
Yes Juan Andre G. Champi but what a bad marketing! since everybody knows the truth -.-!
+Marlon Valle ...then you guys didnt see Bakkie wars III.
Perre, wil julle dit maar nie in Afrikaans aanbied nie - daai aksent is net te hard.
Asseblief
Stupid test, lets se the articulation in rough terrain with and without loads, let’s see how the hilldecent control works against each other.
What do you drive David?
MotorTalk.co.za I own and drive a Jeep Wrangler Unlimited Sahara and a ex-military W461 Geländewagen.
Saw
parece ser tendencioso
Por algo la cámara esta en la amarok, falsooooo
VICTOR HUGO Paz otro Fanboy con el corazón roto....
Observa muy bien a la ranger, también trae una camara🤷♂️🤷♂️
Pero bueno no saben perder
Stupid comparison, is not what is better is what is fast, put 1200kg on each and drive it at least 100km to see what is better.
amarok e foda
Falso, el motor de la ranger tiene mucho más potencia y torque. Le gana con creces a la Amarok.
euristeS S. D. Si se notó en el vídeo.....jajajajaa
Bare in mind that the Ranger is about 500kg heavier than the amarok. That's a half ton! 😂 I'll Rather drive an Amabroek than a Amarok... 🙈
You apparently haven't heard that the amarok chassis is by far the strongest in this class if cars.
It has multiple reinforcements underneath, making it very stiff and strong.
And yet ranger is 500 kg heavier!
Go figure!
el 2.0 de la amarok se se hace agua vacia!! mira si con carga va a levantar asii.. el video cualquiera! la ranger va regulando
Cristian Torres no seas tan Fanboy te va a hacer mal.....
I am of the opinion that the Ford's disappointing performance is MOST LIKELY due to the ALTITUDE at which this test was performed. I know for a fact that the "latest" Ford ECU software DETUNES the engine as a function of barometric pressure to protect the turbo from overspinning and eventually self destructing (warranty). I have seen (with ELM327 BT dongle and Torque app) that at sea level the Ford boosts 1.45bar but from 500m above sea level, it starts to detune itself and when it gets to 1000m above sea level, the turbo will only boost 1.15bar. This reduced boost MUST be accompanied by reduced fuelling in order to keep EGTs within requirements which then translates into reduced engine power. Thus, from 1000m above sea level the engine produces MUCH LESS than 147kW and 470Nm torque.
Therefore, I firmly believe that if this same test was to be conducted at sea level, the results MIGHT be different.
metes una amarok al campo no te dura más de dos meses. Me parece ridículo este "test"
Gonzalo Ponce y vos como sabes si nunca metiste una Amarok al compo.... Seco ,te va a hacer mal el fanatismo seguro andas a pata....
@@franlisi XD XD fatality!!!
😱😱😱😱
Lies vw amarok cant beat 3.2 5 cylinder engine i drive this car everyday its a beast ford ranger is the best its a great perfomer
Какой пробег на вашей машине?
The music!!!! What. The. Hell. I was expecting to hear roaring Diesel engines, and tires shedding up the gravel. But no. What we got was the most inappropriate soundtrack I think I will ever hear. Producers of this video, you have fail today. And I am devastated.
Ford it's a piece of schet! 100 years building pickup....it's a shame....3,2 liters ahainst 2,0 liters.......
2..0 truqueado, fraude aleman
@@franlisi seee
Yes the fuck
seriously!!! what a waste of time.
Mas fake. La ford va regulando y la amarok a fondo por explotar. Jaaaa
Saw an Amarok in the car park the other day and laughed to see it had leaf springs on the rear. What a joke.
s1914 You can mod your rok yourself if you want different springs. A ute is more than it's rear spring guy. It has optional comfort springs.
+MyLifeForAuir87 I bet this guy didn't even know about the comfort Spring option lol
+s1914 Of course, all utes have leaf springs. Because they are meant to be a workhorse to carry tons of loads. Only leaf springs can handle that for durability reason.
+s1914 I laughed at your comment, this is the big issue with having coils in the back, it then is no longer a real workhorse as it cannot carry as much as leaf. Even with leaf springs, the Amaroks suspension is superior on and off road to the rest.
If you were Being less poor you would have used the V6 Amarok
Kak storie
Cambien al manco que maneja la Ranger!!. Tengo una ranger 3.2 y a la mayoria de su competencia las pasa por arriba, incluida la amarok
Cristian Rolon jajajajajajaja a llorar al campito..... Mister muñeca
BS. Ford will outlive the VW shitbox. Mitsubishi Triton is the best.
Lmao Go Vw🤣
Ag julle speel man!!!
no saves manejar la ford amargo
Boy you got wrecked by a bakkie, who has the word "rok" - "dress" in it.
Ford sucks balls. Too expensive and no turbo.. De fuq
I would never buy a VW, VW's suck.
Fake.
Accept defeat
Its fake..!!!