ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 พ.ย. 2020
- The new iFlight crystal is a very good option if you want to upgrade your DJI googles antennas, It gives you more range and it is much more comfortable to use because you don't need to disassemble the antennas every time.
Link for the antenna:
shop.iflight-rc.com/index.php...
So what is your opinion on the antenna? worth the upgrade? tell me in the comments.
Like & subscribe for more!!
Timeline:
00:07 - unboxing
01:21 - installation
03:44 - penetration test STOCK
04:51 - penetration test PATCH TOP
06:23 - penetration test PATCH BOTTOM
07:54 - long range test STOCK
09:17 - long range test PATCH TOP
10:56 - long range test PATCH BOTTOM - บันเทิง
Excellent test! Thank you for the repeatable back-to-back flights. Very very helpful.
Great video. No bullshit, simple presentation, exactly what I needed. It just helped me decide to get one for my goggles. 🙌
I think this could be the best iFlight Crystal Antenna test I’ve seen.
Thanks you!! Glad you like it ✌🏼
I appreciate the time and editing done to record this. I would do it to have the patch on the lower LEFT and upper RIGHT.
Very nice test! Looks like these are noticeably better than stock.
yup, clear and clean test vs stock ! THX !
Nice job/ patch on bottom best run!
Great test.....that .8 mbps on the long distance had my anxiety peaking. Scribed!!!
Excellent job on the testing! Impressive range for 25mW even on stock. Made me nervous on the long range part!
Great test. Your video sold me on these antennas.
I’m new DJI and the stock range is very impressive compared to analog.
Thanks that’s all I needed too know 👍🏿
Glad it helped you!
Excellent video!
Great video 💯
Very nice! Thank you
For this setup, with stationary patch no matter the port plugged into, patch works best plugged into bottom, with omni on top. Some patches directly connect to port instead of mid stationary placement of these, I suspect patches would be better on top for better signal coverage. I'm going to get these, connect to bottom ports, then use my vas crosshair extremes on top and see how it does. Great video btw! Subscribed.
Thanks iflight should sponser you
Have the V2s, with this set up. Omnis on the bottom. I went 600'+ looking the other direction with my racing quad.. no obstructions, but absolutely no break up. Go through woods you have a problem, these antennas are 100% better than stock DJI's.
FPV jet pilot here great review!!
Jets and FPV!?! must be insane!!
I notice a better bitrate with the patch on the bottom.
Thanks for the video ;-)
patch on bottom was the best
This video is awesome, thank you for the review! I have one question, where did you get the replacement goggle foam? Mine have some serious light leakage issues! Thanks 👍
Thank you!! The foam is dji replacement foam from AliExpress
Thanks!
What size screws are they. I bought some attenas went to fit never got any screw's in my package
Thanks for the comparison, How do you get all that data you display on screen during your flight? Is that in the STG file?
I used a program called HandBrake to attach the subtitle file in to the Dave video
i dont know.. i tried them on my DJI FPV and i got like 50% of the range i used to get with my DJI antennas.. any idea why??? im thinking of returning them if i cant fix it ..
I believe there isn't much doubt that having the patches improves for line of sight distance, and perhaps penetration when within the directional beam. But how are the Crystal patches + Omni stubbies for scenarios where you are regularly flying around you (ie you're in the middle of your flight circuit, rather than one end). Are they as equal, better or worse than stock for when the quad is behind you...
I flown for couple days with the patch on bottom and omni on top and on my regular flying close to me i saw a small improvement in mbps.
This is a really good question 👌🏼
better top or bottom good signal range?
Did you test on V2 DJI goggles? If not, wonder how that will change it up with the assigned TX/RX antennas.
V1 use 5GHz and V2 use 2.4 + 5GHz so the antenna are not the same. There will probably be after market antenna for the V2 available soon.
@@TLK22 actually JB says that if you intend to use the V2 only with the AU or vista is preferred to use 5.8ghz antenna only (V1) in order to get better reception, because the 2.4ghz is only for dji fpv drone, so when I get the V2 I will put the iFlight crystal on them for sure
@@OMRC_FPV I did not understand that part and wanted to watch it again. It's good to know but since I own both version, I will keep the v2 for the dji drone only... I installed the crystal on my v1 today and tested it for the first time.
can you use the bottom ports for the patch and move the omni to the top for better coverage?
nm i saw the test, would be nice to have a comparison chart at some point great job!
@@enarramore77 thank you!!
I think that for a better yield the omindirectional antennas must be mounted on the upper side and the direct panels on the lower output
I've tested it. Turns out, it doesn't matter.
When you say 25mw is that on goggles ?
Have you tried boosting the power output to 500 or 700mw?
On the dji fpv system you can only change the mW from the sitting menu on the goggles, so you I was using 25mW
The point of this test is to see what will be the difference on the worse case scenario
Using higher power output will make the results less sensitive to the change in the environment
@@ofekz360 appreciate your answer, I’m thinking whether I need to upgrade soon or stick to stock, and just increase power output to 700 or 1200mw
The stock antenna are great the main reason I upgraded is because I got tired of removing the antenna every time I put the goggles back in the case
There is no need to use 1200mW I’m just running 700mW all the time and have no problem
@@OMRC_FPV thanks again, I heard it’s better to replace them cause they are so long and hardly fit in any bag comfortably so maybe I’ll look into it… would be annoying to take them off all the time so these ones fit perfectly well with the given DJI pouch?
Good video ta. Thought the patch on bottom was best, much better bit rate after you turned round on way back on long range. About 18mbs instead of 10,
I think its always better to have stubbies on top, in my opinion....
@@christophehasselphotos-vid8879 until seeing this I thought soon too. I'm curious about how it will affect the DJI transmitter handset performance too ?
I like your vid except the backround music u select
Looked pretty much the same to me. My advise... just don't fly behind that one building lol.
Why you used 25Mbps?
Because I wanted to simulate the worst case scenario
Fly and test 25mw seriously? All PASSIVES antennas not worth the money. Just money making marketing! Stock DJI antennas work perfectly with FCC 700mw and easy penetrate over 3-4km. With 1200mW can do easy 5-6km in field...Don`t buy this trash if you don`t fly REAL LONG RANGE over 6km+. And then I really doubt their effectiveness. For LONG RANGE more better TrueRC SNIPER II 13.5 dBic or any Helical 14dBic
The channel Wezley varty did testing on these and they work way better even at full power. Guy went all the way out to the 13.3 km max range of the system.
The stock dji ones are just a bit budget. Fine for a few km but struggle to keep up bitrate at long ranges.