If you want them stock, I suppose the V6 should be your choice if you can afford the extra cost. But if you want to buy and then modify, get the 4-cyl. Tons of mods for the 2.0, hardly any for the V6. ZZ Performance sells enough mods for the 2.0 to make it put down over 400hp to the wheels. With this kind of power and the feather-light weight of 3300lb, you'd be smoking many V8s.
@@_cadillacmiketyping...2533 it depends on how much you're spending. Huge funds can get you lots of power for any car. But if you're on a budget, getting extra hp for the 2.0T is cheaper than the V6.
I don't own any of these and have no silly bias pretending one is better than the other, but I really think its awesome that Chevy gives enthusiasts 4 different engine choices for the Camaro. I'm afraid by the time i'm ready to buy the Camaro won't be around. Really wish more people would have bought more of these cars....sigh.
a couple years on, I think its pretty evident that the 2.0t is a strong performer. It's lighter than the V6 and has more torque, with more potential for power adding modifications. After having my 2.0T for a year, I can say without reservation that it is totally enough power for this car. It's very quick and with 295 lb/ft on tap, it gets up to speed very rapidly. I will say, though, that the M6 is essential. Both the 2.0T and 3.6 V6 feel much more alive with the manual transmission. Basically, you pay extra for premium gas with the 2.0T, but you save money up front because the V6 is a 1500 dollar option, and with the 2.0T you get more torque and more "kick in the pants" feeling when driving. It's a great engine and definitely is the best value in the segment. I've had plenty of fast cars, including old Camaros with built small blocks. My 2.0T camaro is more fun than all of them.
Brian Lear I couldn’t agree more! I test drove a couple of v6 Camaros after purchasing my 2.0t, and I gotta say I expected a little more from a 6. I get thrown back in the seat WAY more in my 2.0t. You wouldn’t expect the small torque differences to be like night/day differences lol . Doesn’t sound as nice as the v6, but that’s really the only trade off.
I’m not a street racer, but a few cars out there have tested me at red lights, and my Camaro, once you turn traction control off and get the turbo winding, just takes off on them. So fun to drive
I drive 50 miles to work, one way. I used to drive a 2014 Silverado extended cab, with most features available at the time. The price on trucks, has increased so much, I asked about alternatives. The salesman told me that there were a lot of incentives on the Malibu, I couldn't go wrong. I researched them, and even picked one out. But later, my mouse started to wander. I found that the Camaro was not that much more, and I would drive a Camaro to work. My dad retired from GM, so I can get his employee pricing. I test drove both, the 4 cyl, and the 6 cyl. Gas mileage is not that different, plus add another 60 hp, I went with the 6 cyl., and have not regretted a second. I love it!
@@greg0124 Awesome🙌. I forgot to ask did you install an oil catch can? If so which one did you buy, if you don’t mind. I’ve read that it is recommended to install them asap as they tend to get the intake valves covered on carbon since it’s not a port fuel injection.
Being the owner of a v6, I say this is barely enough for this car. Why would they even make a 4 cyl Camaro?.....v6 is great on gas still has plenty of pick up and go but not super fast. Fast enough for daily driver for sure. Naturally aspirated v6 awesome for the money. Still has great balance and handling without the weight up front of a v8. My two cents....
You don't realize that the 1990's V8 LS and LT engines only made 235-275hp and 345ft lbs or so of torque.. 275hp out of a 4-cyl engine with about 295-300ft lbs of torque, with less weight up front 5.5 sec 0-60, 13.8--1/4 mile time, excellent transmission choices, better ride and handling, and discount prices from the dealership and insurance companies. The 4-cyl 2016-18 Camaro is a most excellent choice. (Mustang too!) The V6 (4-cyl too) These new base/fleet 4&6-cyl Camaro/Mustang engines can be modded to really fly
I drove both and I went with the v6. You can tell the difference when you drive it. It's bad enough ppl will say you have a v6 sports car but to own a 4 cyl is just silly imo unless you just like the look of the car. I would go with something else if I wanted a turbo. I drive alot for work and my v6 is fine on gas
Thanks, could you elaborate as to why you would choose the 6 over the 4 cause it seems by watching other video's alot of people say they would choose the4 over the6?
wellll i would go v6 not just because its faster but the v6 just sounds better in my opinion and its smoother .....even though the i4 might get better ..mpgs i dont think ppl in the class care to much about mpgs lol
It’s good to see ppl enjoying their cars no matter how many cylinders it has. Some like the cars simply for the looks and some like em simply for the sound. Chevy has all the options covered now
I was thinking about getting an 4cyl but add Straight Pipes/Muffler to give it a little sound.. Should i just go w/ a V6 instead.? I want it to sound good.. (V8 is not an option lol) Any suggestions.?
Well man the 4cyl is better on gas mileage you can make it louder it look good (if we are talking about the Camaro) now is up to you I will chose the 4cyl
Honestly it's a waste of $ getting a v8 in Cali Can't drive them any faster than posted and if you get caught, your giving away more $ in tix.. V4 should be good. Looks and sounds good. You can always change things to make it look and sound better
I've raced the 4cly in my 14 v6 there about even same gas mileage I'm kinda pissed off because if gm would've made the 3.6 flx motor with 2 more cylinders it would be the same power as the ss in 15 with a smaller displacement better gas mileage at that a hire redline better rpm range more power my lfx stock pulled on a 4.6 mustang every gear with a manual transmission now if gm would turbo charge the lfx it would of out shame to the 2 ss
I drove both v6 & Turbo 4 Camaro. I like my '16- v6 Mustang better than the V6 Camaro. I bought the Turbo 4 Camaro after driving 4 of them while shopping. The one I bought is slightly louder and more powerful than others. I guess someone gave it a bit more TLC at the factory. The Mustang has more room inside, but the Camaro seats are slightly more comfortable. I get 23-29 MPG's on 93 octane (depending on how I drive). The V6 Mustang gets 22-25 combined MPG's on 87 octane. I like my Camaro slightly more.
Although I have not owned either camaros I can tell my experience with the motors, I had a malibu with an ltg 2.0 (same motor as the camaro) it was quick and made the power at low rpm but kind of dropped off at the top end, my father has a cadillac xts with the 3.6 and the powerband is more wide across the rpms it seems. Although I'd recommend the v6 to be honest, my 2.0 had timing issues and was under 70k miles.
I mean 275hp and 295lb is not bad, still pretty good though these vehicles are pretty heavy aren't they? And idk why I feel the 4cyl should be mt only as well. Feel like that would be better in some way
the 2.0 wheights aroun 3,300 lbs, not that heavy tbh, i owned one not that long ago, its pretty fun, not slow at all, obviously it wont perform like a V8/V6 but if you are looking for fun, affordable and a decent fuel economy it is a great choice.
Thanks for the video, really considering buying a Camaro to go with our challenger. But as u know monthly payments super suck. That 4 cylinder is an eye catcher for me, i wonder what the cons are (other than horse power) cause the price is very appealing. Out here in AZ an lt1 goes for 18k 4 cylinder. 6 cylinder goes for 26k +
+vanleer69 Thanks for enjoying my video. But honestly I'd say go ahead and get the V6. I haven't heard a lot bad things about the 4cyl. Just the only problem is Turbo lag after I think 25K miles. But I'm sure it'll be ok. And I'm sure you're going to love it.
i live in az and bought a 18 4cyl i went with a manuel. test drove the 6 also but the 4 seemed to have the get up and go better and with a manuel i didnt feel any of that crappy lag you feel in an auto when you smash it down.
P&M PRODUCTIONS nope. i just read a guy spent less than 1k. on a tune and his pushing over 350hp. and 360tq :) so yea the 4cyl camaro is better than the 6cyp. but to each their own
Duran Carter just look up 4cyl camaro tune, guy has a video of just a tune and exhaust doing 0-60 in the low 4 second range with the manual. Prob realistically high 4s but still faster than the 6
Try it in person. It sounds worse in person, you can't get the wind-up toy sound out of that engine, no matter how much you fiddle with the exhaust note. The V6 sounds better, and has more even torque and HP. And oddly, V6 takes regular gas, making it cost less for gas (the slight fuel efficiency edge of the turbo doesn't make up for having to put premium in it). Granted, if sound isn't an issue (is for me), either are very nice.
2.0T tiene mas fuersa y al aselerar tiene mas empuje Por el turbo comprensor El motor 6 no genera tanto impulso es un motor sensillo Pueden preguntar a culquier persona que el motor 2.0 es mejor
I don't know brother but what is it with the all the water wave effect /video distortion maybe post proceeding the video did something to it. you know what i'm talking about right?
GM should have never dropped the Bullet Proof 4.3 that was Known for Longevity...Just like the Older GREAT 3.8 v6..Bullet Proof in todays Standards...Them Nightmare gm 3.6 High Tech motors are pure trash motors ...Before you buy..Watch the TH-cam GM dealers dropping the whole engines and trans. just to change defective timing chains and plastic chain guides...Once that Warranty is Gone...You are Totally Screwed for 3-5 Grand or More...Yes 3.6 has more power than its previous motors..BUT if it can't go 200-300k miles, like the previous 4.3v6 and 3.8 v6...Why Bother...US workingPoor people can't afford a new car every 2-3 yrs...I want a an engine that can go the Distsnce, if I choose to keep the vehicle for 5-10yrs...Thats one of main reasons GM dropped the 3.6 and 4.3...They Lasted too LONG...2nd was the Bull Chit EPA emission mandates...
Come on people. Either of these cars would be a great option. There's no one better than the fucking other. The 2.0 turbo is awesome! It's a different kind of feel and for a 4cyld, you can't go wrong. Tune that bitch to make it greater. The v6 is always a good selection as well. Let's quit the bullshit about them being in separate classes. Their not, and will never be. I assure you that 2.0 turbo 4cyld will stay on the back wheels if not the front of that v6. Do your research!
@james Hell I just brought a RS convertible 2018 4cly turbo with 26 tho miles on it Saturday & it's pretty fast handling is SWEET! I love that car I can't agree with you more on what you mention about the car's.
I hate when yall say this 🤣🤣. I have a 2019 Camaro V6 and those 4 cylinders got no chance in hell. The v6 races with the SS 0-60 . That 4 cylinder ain’t got no chance in h*ll.
Chevy Camaro 2.0 Turbo used Toyota Camry motor Variable Valve Timing 😂 wtf is going on here, I couldn’t verified v6 version 😝 but, it does looked like it tho 👍
The 2.0 motor is GM ecotec originally designed by Adam Opel. Not sure about Toyota using vvt, but the first to use vvt in a production car was Alfa in 1980. Vvt-i was introduced by Toyota in the 90's but GM and Opel have been using a version of this engine long before vvt was being used. Vvt was introduced to the ecotec in the Gen2 engine when they started adding superchargers and turbos to the production vehicles. Nothing Toyota in this engine sorry.
I can already tell that’s a lie because one it’s not v4 it’s I4 and two the I4 is faster or sometimes it can hang with the v6 with a turbo lag or a bad throttle response.
Ive never understood the love for these engines... ya they are cheaper and ya you make them produce some power with upgrades... but you will never out power an upgraded V8 you will never get that fucking wonderful growl out of a 4 or 6.... I will stick with my 5.0 supercharged
There's close to a $10,000 price premium going from a 1LT 2.0T to a 1SS 6.2L V8. 0-60mph is 5.5sec for the turbo 4, 14sec@100mph 1/4 mile. The 6.2L 0-60mph is 4.1sec and quarter mile is 12.4sec@115mph. Is the better sounding engine worth that price? Is 1.4seconds faster 0-60mph or 1.6sec 1/4 mile time with a 15mph higher trap speed? For most people probably not.
Mr. Smith typically for some American folk to say, man it’s 4 cyl because of the European standards, big engine and small amount of power is old and toxic for the environment, grow up and realize it’s way better this way. You really talk like you are 70, just enjoy the evolution
@@andreivacaru416 you realize the bigger engines are more modern too, small engine still makes a lot less power than the big one, thats just how it works
Gotta remember that engine's (the 5.3L LS4) engineering was 12 years older than this car. No V6 offered for the same car could beat it. That and it was keep tame so that damage wasn't done to the trans as a result of massive torque output. That's why you see modded LS4 cars blowing up bone stock transmissions. Anyway, you're comparing a 12 year old motor to something brand new..
sleepybird09 camaro is a muscle car not a commuter ss and zl1 should only exist, if you can buy a 2.0 you are wasting money just buy a corolla or something
Was hoping to see a drag race 😔
If you want them stock, I suppose the V6 should be your choice if you can afford the extra cost. But if you want to buy and then modify, get the 4-cyl. Tons of mods for the 2.0, hardly any for the V6. ZZ Performance sells enough mods for the 2.0 to make it put down over 400hp to the wheels. With this kind of power and the feather-light weight of 3300lb, you'd be smoking many V8s.
Overkill makes a great supercharger kit for the v6, 500whp
@@_cadillacmiketyping...2533 it depends on how much you're spending. Huge funds can get you lots of power for any car. But if you're on a budget, getting extra hp for the 2.0T is cheaper than the V6.
@@_cadillacmiketyping...2533 so does adding a bigger turbo as well on the 2.0
@@BuGz_WorldYou can take it to your local turbo shop and make it a big turbo as well
I don't own any of these and have no silly bias pretending one is better than the other, but I really think its awesome that Chevy gives enthusiasts 4 different engine choices for the Camaro. I'm afraid by the time i'm ready to buy the Camaro won't be around. Really wish more people would have bought more of these cars....sigh.
I agree 100%
Called it😢 got my 22 2.0 just in time
a couple years on, I think its pretty evident that the 2.0t is a strong performer. It's lighter than the V6 and has more torque, with more potential for power adding modifications. After having my 2.0T for a year, I can say without reservation that it is totally enough power for this car. It's very quick and with 295 lb/ft on tap, it gets up to speed very rapidly. I will say, though, that the M6 is essential. Both the 2.0T and 3.6 V6 feel much more alive with the manual transmission.
Basically, you pay extra for premium gas with the 2.0T, but you save money up front because the V6 is a 1500 dollar option, and with the 2.0T you get more torque and more "kick in the pants" feeling when driving. It's a great engine and definitely is the best value in the segment. I've had plenty of fast cars, including old Camaros with built small blocks. My 2.0T camaro is more fun than all of them.
Brian Lear I couldn’t agree more! I test drove a couple of v6 Camaros after purchasing my 2.0t, and I gotta say I expected a little more from a 6. I get thrown back in the seat WAY more in my 2.0t. You wouldn’t expect the small torque differences to be like night/day differences lol . Doesn’t sound as nice as the v6, but that’s really the only trade off.
@@LikeAnOriginalBoss turbo torque is available in wide range not like natural aspirated
I’m not a street racer, but a few cars out there have tested me at red lights, and my Camaro, once you turn traction control off and get the turbo winding, just takes off on them. So fun to drive
Good to hear the positive comments about the Camero, 4cyl!! I just got a 4 cyl, it’s enough for me and affordable. I like it!!
@@zonamade3380 If you are a little adventuress put 1500 to 2k into the 4 turbo and youll realize right away the v6 shouldn't even be an option.
V6 sounds better. I test drove one and it was perfect.
They both sound like shit
@@ishaanchahal3959 better than ur moms
@@BlessedOrri stfu
@@BlessedOrri i spit out my pizza, thanks for that lol
@@ishaanchahal3959 hey shhhh it just your opinion so next time say you think it sounds like shut
Love my 2.0 manual trans. Great gas mileage , its quick and loads of fun to row through the gears 👍
I love that all the smaller youtube channels always get the most love in the comments.
+TylerToast I'm not really sure that's a good thing or no. But thanks anyways lol
200% a good thing.
I just picked up a used 2016 Camaro V6 and have been watching videos on it, thats how I ended up here.
TylerToast congratulations man. Drive safe
I drive 50 miles to work, one way. I used to drive a 2014 Silverado extended cab, with most features available at the time. The price on trucks, has increased so much, I asked about alternatives. The salesman told me that there were a lot of incentives on the Malibu, I couldn't go wrong. I researched them, and even picked one out. But later, my mouse started to wander. I found that the Camaro was not that much more, and I would drive a Camaro to work. My dad retired from GM, so I can get his employee pricing. I test drove both, the 4 cyl, and the 6 cyl. Gas mileage is not that different, plus add another 60 hp, I went with the 6 cyl., and have not regretted a second. I love it!
In the front seats, the driver and passenger have plenty leg room, back seats have very little. but I rarely use it anyway.
Congrats
I know it’s a lil late but have had any problems so far I’m planning to buy the manual transmission one
@@ajf4693 Mine is automatic with paddle shifters on the steering wheel. I have 67k miles now and no problems so far.
@@greg0124 Awesome🙌. I forgot to ask did you install an oil catch can? If so which one did you buy, if you don’t mind. I’ve read that it is recommended to install them asap as they tend to get the intake valves covered on carbon since it’s not a port fuel injection.
With gas at $7 a gallon in California everyone with V8s gonna be scrambling to snatch up a 2.0T Camaro. All of sudden it’s the preferred platform.
The engine bay space in the 4 cyl though... space to work is a mechanic’s best friend 😩
Being the owner of a v6, I say this is barely enough for this car. Why would they even make a 4 cyl Camaro?.....v6 is great on gas still has plenty of pick up and go but not super fast. Fast enough for daily driver for sure. Naturally aspirated v6 awesome for the money. Still has great balance and handling without the weight up front of a v8. My two cents....
bfvtx 0-60 between the v6 and 4 cyl is 5.1 to 5.5 that is pretty darn close so I’ll go for more options on the turbo!
bfvtx V6 IS GREAT ON GAS ! I STRAIGHT UP WAISTED MORE GAS IN MY HONDA CIVIC THAN WHAT I SPEND MOBBING IN MY CAMARO
hear that. Im getting around 27 to 30mpg and plenty of power.
You don't realize that the 1990's V8 LS and LT engines only made 235-275hp and 345ft lbs or so of torque..
275hp out of a 4-cyl engine with about 295-300ft lbs of torque, with less weight up front 5.5 sec 0-60, 13.8--1/4 mile time, excellent transmission choices, better ride and handling, and discount prices from the dealership and insurance companies. The 4-cyl 2016-18 Camaro is a most excellent choice. (Mustang too!) The V6 (4-cyl too) These new base/fleet 4&6-cyl Camaro/Mustang engines can be modded to really fly
I drove both and I went with the v6. You can tell the difference when you drive it. It's bad enough ppl will say you have a v6 sports car but to own a 4 cyl is just silly imo unless you just like the look of the car. I would go with something else if I wanted a turbo. I drive alot for work and my v6 is fine on gas
which one did you like more between them, or you think its better ?
The 2.0 sounds better on a cold start. How is that possible??? 🤣
Ethan Blake because of the turbo in it that what gives it its deep voice
@@omarashraf9056 turbos give the opposite...
4 cylinders create more vibration
I am not sure what anyone watching this gets out of it with you not having any commentary. Would like to know your opinion on the 4 vs.6?
+Jay Simpson Id recommend the V6
Thanks, could you elaborate as to why you would choose the 6 over the 4 cause it seems by watching other video's alot of people say they would choose the4 over the6?
+Jay Simpson I'm sorry about that I'll try my best next time
wellll i would go v6 not just because its faster but the v6 just sounds better in my opinion and its smoother .....even though the i4 might get better ..mpgs i dont think ppl in the class care to much about mpgs lol
There's a guy with a tuned 2016 Camaro 2.0.Turbo on here that made 378 hp at the rear wheels on the dyno.
Exactly the video I was looking for! You've earned my sub. Excellent job, bro!
+Tyler Davidson No problem bro. I'm glad you likes the video.
You should have gotten the weights for both for the comparison.
I'd love to see these two cars line up against one another for a run. I'm not sure if that's what was done in this video.
Id love to do that too but unfortunately i cant do it
Which is faster, a v4 with turbo or a v6 ? And does it cost alot to upgrade a v4 just to make it faster if needed?
2:56 me every time someone honks
Fyx5010 lol
It’s good to see ppl enjoying their cars no matter how many cylinders it has. Some like the cars simply for the looks and some like em simply for the sound. Chevy has all the options covered now
I was thinking about getting an 4cyl but add Straight Pipes/Muffler to give it a little sound.. Should i just go w/ a V6 instead.? I want it to sound good.. (V8 is not an option lol) Any suggestions.?
Well man the 4cyl is better on gas mileage you can make it louder it look good (if we are talking about the Camaro) now is up to you I will chose the 4cyl
Honestly it's a waste of $ getting a v8 in Cali
Can't drive them any faster than posted and if you get caught, your giving away more $ in tix.. V4 should be good. Looks and sounds good. You can always change things to make it look and sound better
I got the 4 cylinder it’s pretty fast.
cough cough broke
@@drewmoskal9878 some people can’t afford other options don’t knock them for what they can get, or might even like.
@@jojoshoot2392 they should be getting a corolla instead
@@drewmoskal9878 maybe they don’t like a Corolla lmfao
@@drewmoskal9878what u drive? 😂😂
2.0 turbo all day over the v6
It even sounds nicer too 😂 color me impressed! (I own a 2.0T too but I kept having regrets because it wasnt a V6 :( )
3.6 will last longer, that turbo will burn out at higher mileage
The turbo won't go first unless he beats the hell out of it then in that case the engine goes first.
@@6hilltop6 Turbos on these are reasonably cheap and easy to install.
I've raced the 4cly in my 14 v6 there about even same gas mileage I'm kinda pissed off because if gm would've made the 3.6 flx motor with 2 more cylinders it would be the same power as the ss in 15 with a smaller displacement better gas mileage at that a hire redline better rpm range more power my lfx stock pulled on a 4.6 mustang every gear with a manual transmission now if gm would turbo charge the lfx it would of out shame to the 2 ss
V6 ,MANUAL ,BLUE ,RS ,PRETTY PLEASE .
I drove both v6 & Turbo 4 Camaro. I like my '16- v6 Mustang better than the V6 Camaro. I bought the Turbo 4 Camaro after driving 4 of them while shopping. The one I bought is slightly louder and more powerful than others. I guess someone gave it a bit more TLC at the factory.
The Mustang has more room inside, but the Camaro seats are slightly more comfortable. I get 23-29 MPG's on 93 octane (depending on how I drive). The V6 Mustang gets 22-25 combined MPG's on 87 octane. I like my Camaro slightly more.
Yeah but mustang is ford,
F OUND
O N
R OAD
D EAD
Are they both 6 speeds? Im looking for a stick shift car. Everything is an automatic
you can run it in Manual mode as a 6 speed or automatic which is set for 8 speed.
I'd take the v6 over the 2.0
I'd take the V8 cuz I'm a real man!
@@vincentforsberg4102 i bet you cant afford any of them 4cyl v6 or v8.
john doe definitely considering he has a 1996 silverado
He's probably got a jacked up 4 cyl 2wd truck too.
I got a 2.0 2018 camaro its really worth it
What engine is better in quality???
Although I have not owned either camaros I can tell my experience with the motors, I had a malibu with an ltg 2.0 (same motor as the camaro) it was quick and made the power at low rpm but kind of dropped off at the top end, my father has a cadillac xts with the 3.6 and the powerband is more wide across the rpms it seems. Although I'd recommend the v6 to be honest, my 2.0 had timing issues and was under 70k miles.
Those 3.6 had timing chain issues in 08 with the cts..I think they corrected the problem in 2010 stay clear of any 08/09 Gm 3.6
Where is the drag test.
I mean 275hp and 295lb is not bad, still pretty good though these vehicles are pretty heavy aren't they?
And idk why I feel the 4cyl should be mt only as well. Feel like that would be better in some way
the 2.0 wheights aroun 3,300 lbs, not that heavy tbh, i owned one not that long ago, its pretty fun, not slow at all, obviously it wont perform like a V8/V6 but if you are looking for fun, affordable and a decent fuel economy it is a great choice.
2.0 is definitely a fun car to drive. Not as fun a 97 Z06 Corvette but still super fun
So which one is faster ?
Thanks for the video, really considering buying a Camaro to go with our challenger. But as u know monthly payments super suck. That 4 cylinder is an eye catcher for me, i wonder what the cons are (other than horse power) cause the price is very appealing. Out here in AZ an lt1 goes for 18k 4 cylinder. 6 cylinder goes for 26k +
+vanleer69 Thanks for enjoying my video. But honestly I'd say go ahead and get the V6. I haven't heard a lot bad things about the 4cyl. Just the only problem is Turbo lag after I think 25K miles. But I'm sure it'll be ok. And I'm sure you're going to love it.
the only thing bad about the 4 is the turbo lag . I bought a 4cyl 2LT RS fully loaded and loved it
i live in az and bought a 18 4cyl i went with a manuel. test drove the 6 also but the 4 seemed to have the get up and go better and with a manuel i didnt feel any of that crappy lag you feel in an auto when you smash it down.
@@ceomark. Can u please elaborate on the lag? I'm considering buying a 4cyl and this is the first i've heard about any lag.
Arthur Rimbaud basically when you hit the gas the power isn’t instant like in a v8, it takes a few seconds to kick in. It’s still a good car though.
i can see that 4cyl doing some damage after a nice tune :) also i can see it been an s10 swap
+313stratus yah but you'll spend atleast 10K
P&M PRODUCTIONS not in a tune.. if you just do bolt ons i can see 5k.
P&M PRODUCTIONS nope. i just read a guy spent less than 1k. on a tune and his pushing over 350hp. and 360tq :) so yea the 4cyl camaro is better than the 6cyp. but to each their own
Any link to that build ?
Duran Carter just look up 4cyl camaro tune, guy has a video of just a tune and exhaust doing 0-60 in the low 4 second range with the manual. Prob realistically high 4s but still faster than the 6
idk why these sound so mid my dad has a v6 2017 50 edition camaro and its loauder and sounds so good this sound very bad compared to it
Which one do you prefer?
+Artsy Well the only difference is 8" Center console screen, 8" instrument cluster screen and leather
Thanks bro!
Is the turbo engine better for commuting daily?
I just brought a RS 4cyl turbo convertible Saturday. All I can say it's awesome on gas & everything else!
Absolutely not NA is better .
Nice vids!!!
come-on, he didn't go over 20mph
the V6 has better millage per gallon than the V4 ?
Inline 4***
Honestly, I think 4 cylinder sounds better than v6
Love my 2.0T but that damn A8 Shudder is annoying
four cylinder turbo would be my choice IF I wanted a camero.
Try it in person. It sounds worse in person, you can't get the wind-up toy sound out of that engine, no matter how much you fiddle with the exhaust note.
The V6 sounds better, and has more even torque and HP. And oddly, V6 takes regular gas, making it cost less for gas (the slight fuel efficiency edge of the turbo doesn't make up for having to put premium in it).
Granted, if sound isn't an issue (is for me), either are very nice.
Mark Day camaro*
Paul does the four cylinder actually need premium?
then your choice would be wrong
MrObeseMode 01 yes I own one (getting a V6 soon)
Almost every body start with the little engine the way i see it is better to buy a camaro 4 cyl instead of buy a mustang 4 cyl they are garbage😂😂😂😂
i feel like i just saw two Chihuahuas fighting
It's not the v8
And?!?!?!?!?!? What was the verdict?!?!?
2.0T tiene mas fuersa y al aselerar tiene mas empuje
Por el turbo comprensor
El motor 6 no genera tanto impulso es un motor sensillo
Pueden preguntar a culquier persona que el motor 2.0 es mejor
completamente erroreo
Claro que el 2.0 es mejor además ese v6 se traga una pompa de gas
Toda la razón, probé los dos y me quedo con el 2.0t, además es mucho más tuneable ese motor y de bastante fiabilidad
Hey man I enjoy your videos but I was wondering why you don't talk in them? Your camera work is great.
thanks for watching. check my latest video. i talked
In Europa V6 Is too expensive.
In France only get 4 cylinder or V8
That's interesting, never thought that the 4 cylinder would be in Europe. Makes sense though, with the emissions.
4 clynder sounds a lot better
you definitely need a camera whats with all the waves in the video.
+mountain tiger it's a iPhone 7 plus camera. It doesn't come any better than this
I don't know brother but what is it with the all the water wave effect /video distortion maybe post proceeding the video did something to it. you know what i'm talking about right?
mountain tiger it's because he most likely turned on video stabilization on TH-cam for this video.
ah I see, I didn't know there was such an option. maybe that's what it is.
GM should have never dropped the Bullet Proof 4.3 that was Known for Longevity...Just like the Older GREAT 3.8 v6..Bullet Proof in todays Standards...Them Nightmare gm 3.6 High Tech motors are pure trash motors ...Before you buy..Watch the TH-cam GM dealers dropping the whole engines and trans. just to change defective timing chains and plastic chain guides...Once that Warranty is Gone...You are Totally Screwed for 3-5 Grand or More...Yes 3.6 has more power than its previous motors..BUT if it can't go 200-300k miles, like the previous 4.3v6 and 3.8 v6...Why Bother...US workingPoor people can't afford a new car every 2-3 yrs...I want a an engine that can go the Distsnce, if I choose to keep the vehicle for 5-10yrs...Thats one of main reasons GM dropped the 3.6 and 4.3...They Lasted too LONG...2nd was the Bull Chit EPA emission mandates...
I agree the 4.3 in those early 2000s era blazers were a beast with that Vortec.
Man that 3800 engine was great
What car is fastest?
The v6 is so much better
Come on people. Either of these cars would be a great option. There's no one better than the fucking other. The 2.0 turbo is awesome! It's a different kind of feel and for a 4cyld, you can't go wrong. Tune that bitch to make it greater. The v6 is always a good selection as well. Let's quit the bullshit about them being in separate classes. Their not, and will never be. I assure you that 2.0 turbo 4cyld will stay on the back wheels if not the front of that v6.
Do your research!
@james Hell I just brought a RS convertible 2018 4cly turbo with 26 tho miles on it Saturday & it's pretty fast handling is SWEET! I love that car I can't agree with you more on what you mention about the car's.
I have 2023 4 cylinder Turbo and I love it its very nice go 2 weeks without getting gas and its very light wise while driving and quck
I hate when yall say this 🤣🤣. I have a 2019 Camaro V6 and those 4 cylinders got no chance in hell. The v6 races with the SS 0-60 . That 4 cylinder ain’t got no chance in h*ll.
Chevy Camaro 2.0 Turbo used Toyota Camry motor Variable Valve Timing 😂 wtf is going on here, I couldn’t verified v6 version 😝 but, it does looked like it tho 👍
The 2.0 motor is GM ecotec originally designed by Adam Opel. Not sure about Toyota using vvt, but the first to use vvt in a production car was Alfa in 1980. Vvt-i was introduced by Toyota in the 90's but GM and Opel have been using a version of this engine long before vvt was being used. Vvt was introduced to the ecotec in the Gen2 engine when they started adding superchargers and turbos to the production vehicles. Nothing Toyota in this engine sorry.
Amazing video!
+Mario Y thanks man glad to see you enjoying it
#FUERZAETERNALS #idoles #idolen ✊✊🎉🎉💖🎀❤🔥💙💚💛🚘
Que pasó?
great video. Please drag race
i would do the 3.6 over the 2.0 any day well the only reason i would get that v4 is if i gave it to my wife otherwise not for a guy
wtf.....ur stupid!
How cute
V4! LOL I suppose next we're going to have the L3!!
Yeah... v4. You just proved to the internet you know nothing about cars.
Beto Ortega did you mean M4 🤔.... that’s a bimmer tho
Sound is the least of my worries. MPG is what matters
Then wtf are you checking out comaroes for
Rs package is just 👎👎👎👎👎 and bumper really looks so baddddd
All that intro for nothing lol!
I've ran a v4 in my v6 v6 gaps it
I can already tell that’s a lie because one it’s not v4 it’s I4 and two the I4 is faster or sometimes it can hang with the v6 with a turbo lag or a bad throttle response.
love this video
+Derrick Nutall grad to see you enjoying my videos 😊
2.0 all the way
awesome!
Ive never understood the love for these engines... ya they are cheaper and ya you make them produce some power with upgrades... but you will never out power an upgraded V8 you will never get that fucking wonderful growl out of a 4 or 6.... I will stick with my 5.0 supercharged
There's close to a $10,000 price premium going from a 1LT 2.0T to a 1SS 6.2L V8. 0-60mph is 5.5sec for the turbo 4, 14sec@100mph 1/4 mile. The 6.2L 0-60mph is 4.1sec and quarter mile is 12.4sec@115mph.
Is the better sounding engine worth that price? Is 1.4seconds faster 0-60mph or 1.6sec 1/4 mile time with a 15mph higher trap speed? For most people probably not.
Of course the v8 is better, but a lot more money too!!! I like my 4cyl? Has enough of everything for me !
Everybody isn’t trying to outdo a v8 tho
V8
Fake!!! Those cars have 6 cyl !!!!!
A castrated camero.
Despite the horses manufacturers can get out of a modern 4cyl, 6cyl engines, they don’t belong in a camero.
...you're absolutely right...thats why they put they in the Camaro...
Mr. Smith typically for some American folk to say, man it’s 4 cyl because of the European standards, big engine and small amount of power is old and toxic for the environment, grow up and realize it’s way better this way. You really talk like you are 70, just enjoy the evolution
Hey at least it's not an Iron Duke 😆
@@andreivacaru416 you realize the bigger engines are more modern too, small engine still makes a lot less power than the big one, thats just how it works
😂😂😂 camero
Hate to tell you GM the price for both are in the $30.000 +\= range and both are totally junk . You made garbage on wheels ...
More like a25.000 thousand for the 2.0
Buuu camera
that trim around the stereo is enough to make me pass on the new camaro. it really is crappy looking
I can’t stand the plain interior in Chevy vehicles.
I prefer Mustang
2 horrible engines that should.never be in American muscle
it shouldnt be in a camaro period.
P&M PRODUCTIONS i atleast respect that chevy put some effort into he v6 rather than slapping the impala ss v8 5.3 that makes barely 300
Gotta remember that engine's (the 5.3L LS4) engineering was 12 years older than this car. No V6 offered for the same car could beat it. That and it was keep tame so that damage wasn't done to the trans as a result of massive torque output. That's why you see modded LS4 cars blowing up bone stock transmissions.
Anyway, you're comparing a 12 year old motor to something brand new..
camaros are cheap cars. what do you expect??? 5 liter quad turbo V12???
sleepybird09 camaro is a muscle car not a commuter ss and zl1 should only exist, if you can buy a 2.0 you are wasting money just buy a corolla or something