If you’re ever injured in an accident, you can check out Morgan & Morgan. You can submit a claim in 8 clicks or less without having to leave your couch. To start your claim, visit: www.forthepeople.com/BookofValis
@BookofValis For well over 300 years (ever since Newton vs Leibniz) we have defined 0 and 1 (and their geometric counterparts) as follows: 0 = not-necessary 0D = not-necessary 1 = necessary 1D = necessary (Newton won so above are his definitions. Newton conflated "natural" with "necessary" and was largely ignorant of Geometry.) A year ago quantum physics proved that Leibniz was actually correct (the universe is "not locally real") which looks like this: 0 = necessary 0D = necessary 1= not-necessary 1D = not-necessary Since Mathematics > Physics > Chemistry > Biology... the implications of the definitions of 0 and 1 changing are world altering. "Only the zero-of yourself is necessary" is now a true statement (always has been). That's neat to think about. A little over a year ago the zero-of yourself was not-necessary. See how the facts change over time? Newton really set humanity back with his conflated definitions. Zero is the most important number in mathematics and is both a real and an imaginary number with a horizon through it. It's geometric counterpart zero-dimensional space is the most important dimension in physics and is both a real and an imaginary dimension with an event horizon through it. Quarks are zero-dimensional color-charged electricity and the Monad is the zero-dimensional space binding our quarks together with the strong force; the hue-monad (or soul). Read Leibniz's Monadology 📖. Black holes are ten-dimensional: Zero is the only number with a horizon through it. Zero-dimensional space is the only dimension with an event horizon through it. So, has to include a 0. Got it. 0 and 10 are the first two times we encounter zero in the natural number system (1-9 are nonzero numbers). Their geometric counterparts 0D (quantum) and 10D (cosmological) would then be the event horizon boundaries of this side of the mirror universe. What is the definition of zero in math? Zero is the integer denoted 0 that, when used as a counting number, means that no objects are present. It is the only integer (and, in fact, the only real number) that is neither negative nor positive. A number which is not zero is said to be nonzero. A root of a function is also sometimes known as "a zero of ." Any non-zero number to the zero power equals one. Zero to any positive exponent equals zero. Zero is the subject where counting numbers are the objects. [Subject]: a thinking or feeling entity; the conscious mind; the ego, especially as opposed to anything external to the mind. [Object]: a thing external to the thinking mind or subject.
@BookofValis Monad (from Greek μονάς monas, "singularity" in turn from μόνος monos, "alone") refers, in cosmogony, to the Supreme Being, divinity or the totality of all things. The concept was reportedly conceived by the Pythagoreans and may refer variously to a single source acting alone, or to an indivisible origin, or to both. The concept was later adopted by other philosophers, such as Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, who referred to the Monad as an *elementary particle.* It had a *geometric counterpart,* which was debated and discussed contemporaneously by the same groups of people. [In this speculative scenario, let's consider Leibniz's *Monad,* from the philosophical work "The Monadology", as an abstract representation of *the zero-dimensional space that binds quarks together* using the strong nuclear force]: 1) Indivisibility and Unity: Monads, as indivisible entities, mirror the nature of quarks, which are deemed elementary and indivisible particles in our theoretical context. Just as monads possess unity and indivisibility, quarks are unified in their interactions through the strong force. 2) Interconnectedness: Leibniz's monads are interconnected, each reflecting the entire universe from its own perspective. In a parallel manner, the interconnectedness of quarks through the strong force could be metaphorically represented by the interplay of monads, forming a web that holds particles together. 3) Inherent Properties: Just as monads possess inherent perceptions and appetitions, quarks could be thought of as having intrinsic properties like color charge, reflecting the inherent qualities of monads and influencing their interactions. 4) Harmony: The concept of monads contributing to universal harmony resonates with the idea that the strong nuclear force maintains harmony within atomic nuclei by counteracting the electromagnetic repulsion between protons, allowing for the stability of matter. 5) Pre-established Harmony: Monads' pre-established harmony aligns with the idea that the strong force was pre-designed to ensure stable interactions among quarks, orchestrating their behavior in a way that parallels the harmony envisaged by Leibniz. 6) Non-Mechanical Interaction: Monads interact non-mechanically, mirroring the non-mechanical interactions of quarks through gluon exchange. This connection might be seen as a metaphorical reflection of the intricacies of quark-gluon dynamics. 7) Holism: The holistic perspective of monads could symbolize how quarks, like the monads' interconnections, contribute holistically to the structure and behavior of particles through the strong force interactions.
I really enjoy this type of content from you. These icebergs are actually interesting and you have enough to say about each subject so it doesn’t feel boring.
Valis, once again you enhance my drunken late nights into an experience that I look forward to. Thank you for this, you'll never know how much it means.
I love how in depth These topics are covered. Not just a simple explanation what it means but also referring papers and research. Keep up the good work!
Fr! He’s the main iceberg person I watch and I’ve watched other and was extremely confused when they literally only said one sentence about each topic 😭
I personally believe morality comes from our ancestors as a pure instinct to survive. The most baseline aspect of morality: do not kill others, likely derived from when we were much smaller in population, and thus killing each other would lead to extinction and thus we needed to survive together. Or that early humans needed to work together to find food, take care of children, and provide for each other led to morals about hurting one another. As society advances and gets less worried about extinction and survival as a whole, morality changes. the fact that we are overpopulated, and no longer need to breed so often to maintain the species, leads to more leeway about whether people HAVE to take a partner or have children, for example
Exactly, morality has always sprung from altruism. People who say that morality is subjective have no concept of altruism. There are objective evils within the scope of a species and how they treat their peers and environment. Period. End of discussion.
@@LifesizemortalImo, Morality is subjective for this reason! Some things like murder is wrong etc is obvious, but other morals (like some believing homosexuality is wrong or something) can be subjective. Here's a question that I often see: Would you rather save your pet or a random stranger? Some people say they'd save their pet, some way they'd save the stranger. Cultures around the world have entirely different morals from each other, mostly based on religion or cultural beliefs. How do we know, objectively, who's morals are correct?
I've never gone into deep thought on morality, but the only thing I can distinguish is between natural and mental/spiritual morals. Natural morality is to me as you described, and I think it can be objectively quantified. Non-natural morality, on the other hand, is purely subjective if not built on these natural instincts and adaptations. It doesn't matter to me how transcendental and smart some of these moral worldviews are. If they're not based on this reality, they're out of place.
i just adore your deep dives into meso-american culture, that are still well to be understood for an interested lay person, you are doing good work here
In 2011 CERN detected particles going faster than light, there was a big deal made about this(obviously) but what was weird is after a few months (I think) it was ,after a review process, attributed to "loose cables" and other minor things . That's not the weird thing, what was odd was the entire team that worked on that test and that reported the results quit, because they said they already made sure everything was neat and tidy... Why would they quit ? Because they actually detected those particles going faster than light, and disagreed with the cover-up
it makes sense that something could travel faster than light under the right conditions. light is just a particle... (that acts like a wave when observed). it's just a particle that is so small that observations effect it, because humans produce emf. (we use electricity to send siganls to organs, every moving electron creates a magnetic field, and it's measurable) so a quark or something lighter that a light particle that has force behind it could definitely move faster than light. why they would want to hide that fact? I'm not sure about that... they contradict themselves so much... they being the controllers. the one's that hide the truth and take you out if you make a car that runs on hydrogen fuel cells.
The idea that I can’t grasp infinity when going backwards in time before the Big Bang, as in always was but until the point of our universe created is one of my personal reasons why I’m agnostic
Think of the universe needing a clock to keep time. Right now, an intelligent civilization like ourselves can measure time passing with something like the decay of a star, or even a planet spinning. Before that, before the Big Bang, there was nothing to measure time, therefore it is completely irrelevant to an intelligent civilization, it didn’t exist, it isn’t relevant. Only the most minute fluctuations happen in the fabric of existence. There are theories that the Big Bang are the result of one of those fluctuations that happened to expand that infinitely dense point that would become our universe
Reality is very paradoxical, no matter what your view on creation is you have to accept that something has always existed without anything to create it. Even if particles caused the big bang you have to wonder what allowed the particles to originally exist, any if they were created by something prior then what created that thing. The idea of something having always existed in our universe is the only view that makes sense rationally, but at the same time it can't possibly make sense within our human framework of logic
There are many scientists from different countries trying to find cures for many diseases If cures are not meant to be released, why spend on research? What do they do in their labs then? J3rk 0ff all day long?
Profit driven healthcare is a scourge on humanity. The Rich don’t care about the poor, only about making more money. Anyone who has over a billion dollars is actively choosing to not help others with their influence
Curing cancer means less people not working. Less cancer means less people who are not contributing to an economy in a meaningful way. From the point of view of a pharmacy, yeah, a one treatment cure would mean less money. From the point of view from an entire society, it would mean a benefit to everyone, including pharmacys. Cancer hasn't been cured because we don't know how to, not because people don't want to
As someone who believes in the Trinity, I definitely understand how people see it as more that one God. We actually have an explanation though, but it’s a bit tricky. Christianity isn’t the only religion with a trinity, as it can be found in Hinduism also.
I have seen arguments that Catholics in particular are rather polytheistic, or at least close to certain ones of that type with all their saints and saintly stories like slaying dragons and the tarasque, among other things.
@@AlekseyMaksimovichPeshkov Easter, the most important days with Jesus being reborn is on which day now? Oh, right, the first FULL MOON weekend after the beginning of spring! And his birth just happens to be shortly after the winter solstice, Saturnalia? Yeah, totally normal as well.
I always love your videos. Still do. However saying “there are many who have debunked this” and not elaborating whatsoever doesn’t work for me ngl. Give more than that
Theories about ancient history have always been my favorite. Some of them are also the ones that I find the most likely to be true. With how old our planet is and with how many worldwide cataclysms it has been threw whos to say what really happened long in its past. Even history from not so long ago can be lost or altered to suit ergain peoples naritives. The USSR did it when they formed, they went in and destroyed the history of small ethinic groups like the tartars, burning books, forced edu ation, forcing a new language on them, forcing athem to stop following there religous and spiritual learning and activities,killing off all the intellectuals so that the youmger generation wouldn't know their ancestors stories and heritage. So if this could happen in the last centuary how many other times in history have peoples entire history been wiped out like this or by a whole group of people being completely wiped put either by war and slaughter or by a more localized cataclysm. We struggle to learn things about people long gone by looking at scraps and ruins left behind from people who haven't existed for thousands of years. We use our own modern thinking to put together what we find to try and understand what the things we find are and how they were used. Archeologists form their views based on this, and then future Archeologists use their own views on top of the ones that came before them to do future work. All awhile other findings and new views come along that they refuse to even entertain, sometimes with it getting to the point where anyone with half a brain coul clearly see the truth they will refuse to see it because it doesnt fit there world view of how an eint people lived. There are so many ancient mysteries that we may never solve(unless you believe whatever the academics say about these said places). But that to me is what makes Archeology so interesting and fun. It amazes me that rather than use this as a plus and use it to get more people interested and get more both government and private funding to explore and learn as much as we can about this. Archeologists would rather prete to already know all the answers and shoot down anyone who doesn't completely agree than just say we don't know sometimes or god forbid admit they were wrong on occasion or give even a smallest minacule of a chance that someone not as "educated" as them, someone thats not an insider may have figured out aomething they didn't or proven one of there long held beliefs wrong.
HMU if you need help with the mesoamerican video, me and my family are Maya and i can point you to a lot of great resources that go into Maya religion and history
30:28 how does the upper lid of eye look like that 0-0 or is it a trick of the light? gradient eye makeup tricking us? even at 30:29 eyelid looks like a clay cup 0^0
Agreed. This was not even an iceberg list this was just him ranting about his moral opinions. Actually extremely intellectually dishonest and completely passively dismisses any other world view that isn’t some university atheist…. I mean cmon!!!
@@1surfpesca_just coz he talks about the views of non religious people on religion doesn’t make him bias, regardless of if he’s atheist you have to understand not everyone is religious that don’t make him bias
@@Will-bn9km my friend read my comment again. I don’t think you will read the word “bias” in there even once. So I have no idea why you brought up bias.
@@Will-bn9km the point as, that these are not conspiracy theories… they’re just random conjectures from university atheist scholars, with like 2 “conspiracy theories” chalked in there. If he wanted to make a video like this that’s totally fine, but to advertise it to viewers as conspiracy theories? Intellectually dishonest
Just to clarify, we (Christians), (not Catholics) do not believe in 3 gods. We believe in 1 God. The Trinity is the three persons of God Almighty. The Holy Spirit, Jesus the Son of God, and God the Father all in one. One God, not three.
Aye I never got this in my subscription feed. And it looks like it’s not performing at the level of most of your other videos. Might wanna look into it, I think you got shafted by a TH-cam glitch on this one
If you’re ever injured in an accident, you can check out Morgan & Morgan. You can submit a claim in 8 clicks or less without having to leave your couch. To start your claim, visit: www.forthepeople.com/BookofValis
Why are the mesoamerican and animism topics dark theories? Those were just regular history/anthropology lessons
@15:23
Which are?
28:08
Are you sure you know how we are saved through Christ?
@BookofValis
For well over 300 years (ever since Newton vs Leibniz) we have defined 0 and 1 (and their geometric counterparts) as follows:
0 = not-necessary
0D = not-necessary
1 = necessary
1D = necessary
(Newton won so above are his definitions. Newton conflated "natural" with "necessary" and was largely ignorant of Geometry.)
A year ago quantum physics proved that Leibniz was actually correct (the universe is "not locally real") which looks like this:
0 = necessary
0D = necessary
1= not-necessary
1D = not-necessary
Since Mathematics > Physics > Chemistry > Biology... the implications of the definitions of 0 and 1 changing are world altering.
"Only the zero-of yourself is necessary" is now a true statement (always has been). That's neat to think about.
A little over a year ago the zero-of yourself was not-necessary. See how the facts change over time? Newton really set humanity back with his conflated definitions.
Zero is the most important number in mathematics and is both a real and an imaginary number with a horizon through it.
It's geometric counterpart zero-dimensional space is the most important dimension in physics and is both a real and an imaginary dimension with an event horizon through it.
Quarks are zero-dimensional color-charged electricity and the Monad is the zero-dimensional space binding our quarks together with the strong force; the hue-monad (or soul). Read Leibniz's Monadology 📖.
Black holes are ten-dimensional:
Zero is the only number with a horizon through it.
Zero-dimensional space is the only dimension with an event horizon through it.
So, has to include a 0. Got it.
0 and 10 are the first two times we encounter zero in the natural number system (1-9 are nonzero numbers). Their geometric counterparts 0D (quantum) and 10D (cosmological) would then be the event horizon boundaries of this side of the mirror universe.
What is the definition of zero in math?
Zero is the integer denoted 0 that, when used as a counting number, means that no objects are present. It is the only integer (and, in fact, the only real number) that is neither negative nor positive. A number which is not zero is said to be nonzero. A root of a function is also sometimes known as "a zero of ."
Any non-zero number to the zero power equals one.
Zero to any positive exponent equals zero.
Zero is the subject where counting numbers are the objects.
[Subject]:
a thinking or feeling entity; the conscious mind; the ego, especially as opposed to anything external to the mind.
[Object]:
a thing external to the thinking mind or subject.
@BookofValis
Monad (from Greek μονάς monas, "singularity" in turn from μόνος monos, "alone") refers, in cosmogony, to the Supreme Being, divinity or the totality of all things.
The concept was reportedly conceived by the Pythagoreans and may refer variously to a single source acting alone, or to an indivisible origin, or to both.
The concept was later adopted by other philosophers, such as Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, who referred to the Monad as an *elementary particle.*
It had a *geometric counterpart,* which was debated and discussed contemporaneously by the same groups of people.
[In this speculative scenario, let's consider Leibniz's *Monad,* from the philosophical work "The Monadology", as an abstract representation of *the zero-dimensional space that binds quarks together* using the strong nuclear force]:
1) Indivisibility and Unity: Monads, as indivisible entities, mirror the nature of quarks, which are deemed elementary and indivisible particles in our theoretical context. Just as monads possess unity and indivisibility, quarks are unified in their interactions through the strong force.
2) Interconnectedness: Leibniz's monads are interconnected, each reflecting the entire universe from its own perspective. In a parallel manner, the interconnectedness of quarks through the strong force could be metaphorically represented by the interplay of monads, forming a web that holds particles together.
3) Inherent Properties: Just as monads possess inherent perceptions and appetitions, quarks could be thought of as having intrinsic properties like color charge, reflecting the inherent qualities of monads and influencing their interactions.
4) Harmony: The concept of monads contributing to universal harmony resonates with the idea that the strong nuclear force maintains harmony within atomic nuclei by counteracting the electromagnetic repulsion between protons, allowing for the stability of matter.
5) Pre-established Harmony: Monads' pre-established harmony aligns with the idea that the strong force was pre-designed to ensure stable interactions among quarks, orchestrating their behavior in a way that parallels the harmony envisaged by Leibniz.
6) Non-Mechanical Interaction: Monads interact non-mechanically, mirroring the non-mechanical interactions of quarks through gluon exchange. This connection might be seen as a metaphorical reflection of the intricacies of quark-gluon dynamics.
7) Holism: The holistic perspective of monads could symbolize how quarks, like the monads' interconnections, contribute holistically to the structure and behavior of particles through the strong force interactions.
I really enjoy this type of content from you. These icebergs are actually interesting and you have enough to say about each subject so it doesn’t feel boring.
As a Mexican from Zacapu I really appreciate you taking the time to really research this and pass the information on to more people
personally as a buddhist your definition on kalapas was on point imo
Valis, once again you enhance my drunken late nights into an experience that I look forward to.
Thank you for this, you'll never know how much it means.
I have been anticipating this video for such a LONG time, good work!!! ^^
Bro i love your videos so much that i was hyped when i saw u uploaded. This one was dope af!! KEep it up my man
I love how in depth These topics are covered. Not just a simple explanation what it means but also referring papers and research. Keep up the good work!
Fr! He’s the main iceberg person I watch and I’ve watched other and was extremely confused when they literally only said one sentence about each topic 😭
The effort you put into these is fantastic, keep up the great work man!! :)
i love this channel, iceberg videos are awesome
It's always nice to see an upload from you.
Wish we as humans right now could look farther back and know more about ancient history. Loving this video🔥
Thanks bro, I love watching your iceberg videos. Keep em' coming!!
love this video valis, you always make amazing content ❤
I personally believe morality comes from our ancestors as a pure instinct to survive. The most baseline aspect of morality: do not kill others, likely derived from when we were much smaller in population, and thus killing each other would lead to extinction and thus we needed to survive together. Or that early humans needed to work together to find food, take care of children, and provide for each other led to morals about hurting one another. As society advances and gets less worried about extinction and survival as a whole, morality changes. the fact that we are overpopulated, and no longer need to breed so often to maintain the species, leads to more leeway about whether people HAVE to take a partner or have children, for example
Exactly, morality has always sprung from altruism. People who say that morality is subjective have no concept of altruism. There are objective evils within the scope of a species and how they treat their peers and environment. Period. End of discussion.
We are not overpopulated.
@@LifesizemortalImo, Morality is subjective for this reason! Some things like murder is wrong etc is obvious, but other morals (like some believing homosexuality is wrong or something) can be subjective. Here's a question that I often see: Would you rather save your pet or a random stranger? Some people say they'd save their pet, some way they'd save the stranger. Cultures around the world have entirely different morals from each other, mostly based on religion or cultural beliefs. How do we know, objectively, who's morals are correct?
You're nowhere near overpopulated
I've never gone into deep thought on morality, but the only thing I can distinguish is between natural and mental/spiritual morals. Natural morality is to me as you described, and I think it can be objectively quantified. Non-natural morality, on the other hand, is purely subjective if not built on these natural instincts and adaptations. It doesn't matter to me how transcendental and smart some of these moral worldviews are. If they're not based on this reality, they're out of place.
great vid....going hard with the in video advertisements i see lol, respect the hustle
Love these iceberg videos of yours, awesome stuff 🔥🔥🔥
I can’t believe I haven’t subscribed already, I watched almost all of your videos.
I love your videos! Your voice is so soothing to me! Please keep up the fantastic work!
Never heard of the evolutionary concept of Luca you learn something new everyday
Thanks for your work, Valis!
Superb content, as usual. Thank you.
i just adore your deep dives into meso-american culture, that are still well to be understood for an interested lay person, you are doing good work here
Yay a fascinating iceberg video to watch in the morning as a I get ready 😅 thank you 💜
I love this TH-cam channel. Subscribed in a flash I enjoy the structure of your content
Even though we only see you for promos…it makes your vids more personal. Better. Keep doing that. 👏🏾
Your videos are killin it man I’m glad I checked back in on your channel I was subbed with notifications but I don’t get them
Love these theories videos
In 2011 CERN detected particles going faster than light, there was a big deal made about this(obviously) but what was weird is after a few months (I think) it was ,after a review process, attributed to "loose cables" and other minor things .
That's not the weird thing, what was odd was the entire team that worked on that test and that reported the results quit, because they said they already made sure everything was neat and tidy... Why would they quit ? Because they actually detected those particles going faster than light, and disagreed with the cover-up
More information on this?
@@timbuktu4235 probably not hard to find, lazy-boy.
it makes sense that something could travel faster than light under the right conditions. light is just a particle... (that acts like a wave when observed). it's just a particle that is so small that observations effect it, because humans produce emf. (we use electricity to send siganls to organs, every moving electron creates a magnetic field, and it's measurable) so a quark or something lighter that a light particle that has force behind it could definitely move faster than light. why they would want to hide that fact? I'm not sure about that... they contradict themselves so much... they being the controllers. the one's that hide the truth and take you out if you make a car that runs on hydrogen fuel cells.
really teaching good stuff here bro got me intrested in a lot of these enough to go do research
Great job Valis! Thanks
Keep up the hard work!❤👍
The idea that I can’t grasp infinity when going backwards in time before the Big Bang, as in always was but until the point of our universe created is one of my personal reasons why I’m agnostic
Think of the universe needing a clock to keep time. Right now, an intelligent civilization like ourselves can measure time passing with something like the decay of a star, or even a planet spinning. Before that, before the Big Bang, there was nothing to measure time, therefore it is completely irrelevant to an intelligent civilization, it didn’t exist, it isn’t relevant. Only the most minute fluctuations happen in the fabric of existence. There are theories that the Big Bang are the result of one of those fluctuations that happened to expand that infinitely dense point that would become our universe
aah the ole darwinian/newtonian/copernican/gallilean freemasonic lie from the pits of hells kitchen 👁🗨
For all we know our universe might be some 10th dimensional creature's middle school science project.
Reality is very paradoxical, no matter what your view on creation is you have to accept that something has always existed without anything to create it. Even if particles caused the big bang you have to wonder what allowed the particles to originally exist, any if they were created by something prior then what created that thing. The idea of something having always existed in our universe is the only view that makes sense rationally, but at the same time it can't possibly make sense within our human framework of logic
God is pretty much the best argument.
Omg you just came back at the right time to cure my damn boredom thank u guy
Cool to see u grow, keep it up
Please please PLEASEEE make a video about ancient Mexican history!!! I will watch all the episodes. 19:41
There’s money only in the treatment, never in the cure. Why people who literally live in a capitalist society refuse to grasp this fact is BEYOND me.
There are many scientists from different countries trying to find cures for many diseases
If cures are not meant to be released, why spend on research? What do they do in their labs then? J3rk 0ff all day long?
Facts
Profit driven healthcare is a scourge on humanity. The Rich don’t care about the poor, only about making more money. Anyone who has over a billion dollars is actively choosing to not help others with their influence
Curing cancer means less people not working. Less cancer means less people who are not contributing to an economy in a meaningful way. From the point of view of a pharmacy, yeah, a one treatment cure would mean less money. From the point of view from an entire society, it would mean a benefit to everyone, including pharmacys. Cancer hasn't been cured because we don't know how to, not because people don't want to
@@sebastiangalger8800cap
Watching the Steelers lose to the Cardinals, in weather delay- time for some Valis...
I'm a simple guy, I see pre-Columbian art, I click
I’m a simple guy, I see book of valis posted a new video and drop whatever i’m doing
As someone who believes in the Trinity, I definitely understand how people see it as more that one God. We actually have an explanation though, but it’s a bit tricky. Christianity isn’t the only religion with a trinity, as it can be found in Hinduism also.
In short Imagine it as one Body 3 heads neither head is the same as the other but they are all apart of the same being
@@Fish_tank75yep. You know it best. They are each to their own but are one ☦️🤲🏻🙏🏻
I love these videos thank you
I have seen arguments that Catholics in particular are rather polytheistic, or at least close to certain ones of that type with all their saints and saintly stories like slaying dragons and the tarasque, among other things.
@@AlekseyMaksimovichPeshkov Easter, the most important days with Jesus being reborn is on which day now? Oh, right, the first FULL MOON weekend after the beginning of spring!
And his birth just happens to be shortly after the winter solstice, Saturnalia? Yeah, totally normal as well.
Great video bro
Everythings is lovely, just wish it was slower tho. Anyway keep up the good work!
Obsessed with your channel
Great video
TY ❤️
13:22 they can hybridize. It's extremely uncommon though. There was only a single Hybrid so far and sadly it didn't survive until Adulthood
Awesome video I love your content.
🎉🎉🎉 thanks for this superb video
Can’t wait for that video about North/south American culture
I like how you said "south- ern " 😂 its suth-ern , keep up these types of videos I like them
I have been dying for a upload
Could you tallk about Mayan myths and legends in a future video plz?
We need a video on the black eye club theory
Your video's are the best
The aztec myth... SOOOO interesting
What is nothing if you think about it because nothing has to be something
Nothing can exist no thing can exist
Our morality is god given. Only some of us choose to listen.
I always love your videos. Still do. However saying “there are many who have debunked this” and not elaborating whatsoever doesn’t work for me ngl. Give more than that
You got a point honestly, I thought I was talking too much about it when writing that section, so I cut it short.
@@BookofValiscan you give me some sources though please.
Which topic did you want sources for specifically? But yeah it might be a great idea for valis to include all sources in a google doc or something ❤
God Bless 🙏 Thank you for sharing with us.
The indigenous Australians believe in the “Dreaming/Dreamtime”
Similar to the holographic universe theory!
what was the dark theorie about the rigveda?
Theories about ancient history have always been my favorite. Some of them are also the ones that I find the most likely to be true. With how old our planet is and with how many worldwide cataclysms it has been threw whos to say what really happened long in its past. Even history from not so long ago can be lost or altered to suit ergain peoples naritives. The USSR did it when they formed, they went in and destroyed the history of small ethinic groups like the tartars, burning books, forced edu ation, forcing a new language on them, forcing athem to stop following there religous and spiritual learning and activities,killing off all the intellectuals so that the youmger generation wouldn't know their ancestors stories and heritage. So if this could happen in the last centuary how many other times in history have peoples entire history been wiped out like this or by a whole group of people being completely wiped put either by war and slaughter or by a more localized cataclysm. We struggle to learn things about people long gone by looking at scraps and ruins left behind from people who haven't existed for thousands of years. We use our own modern thinking to put together what we find to try and understand what the things we find are and how they were used. Archeologists form their views based on this, and then future Archeologists use their own views on top of the ones that came before them to do future work. All awhile other findings and new views come along that they refuse to even entertain, sometimes with it getting to the point where anyone with half a brain coul clearly see the truth they will refuse to see it because it doesnt fit there world view of how an eint people lived.
There are so many ancient mysteries that we may never solve(unless you believe whatever the academics say about these said places). But that to me is what makes Archeology so interesting and fun. It amazes me that rather than use this as a plus and use it to get more people interested and get more both government and private funding to explore and learn as much as we can about this. Archeologists would rather prete to already know all the answers and shoot down anyone who doesn't completely agree than just say we don't know sometimes or god forbid admit they were wrong on occasion or give even a smallest minacule of a chance that someone not as "educated" as them, someone thats not an insider may have figured out aomething they didn't or proven one of there long held beliefs wrong.
OMG, I thought it was always Book Of Alice 😅
HMU if you need help with the mesoamerican video, me and my family are Maya and i can point you to a lot of great resources that go into Maya religion and history
Another video titled "The Darkest Theories Iceberg Explained", why?
It's a series on my channel, I don't see the issue?
@@BookofValis usually they're numbered
Velmi pěkné video (a comment to please the gods)
Nice to know you guys are waking up, this is a important step on the way up, kudo's and keep waking up, and know your world for what it was and is.❤
Should do a video of Aztec gods
Great video!!! I'm a fan of greek ancient
Also to help you understand the time fragments you are seeing in theory, they are your sueco
From the thumbnail I thought the iceberg explained Hulk Hogan and Seal.
30:28 how does the upper lid of eye look like that 0-0
or is it a trick of the light? gradient eye makeup tricking us? even at 30:29 eyelid looks like a clay cup 0^0
This guy really nails these pronunciations
10:30 I thought it was a Nintendo character.
Morality was built into us by the design of our creator God and there is no other logical and consistent explanation for morality than that.
BIG BANG! bAng! bAAAng. Not BING.
Not even conspiracy theory’s at this point
Agreed. This was not even an iceberg list this was just him ranting about his moral opinions. Actually extremely intellectually dishonest and completely passively dismisses any other world view that isn’t some university atheist….
I mean cmon!!!
Facts!💯
@@1surfpesca_just coz he talks about the views of non religious people on religion doesn’t make him bias, regardless of if he’s atheist you have to understand not everyone is religious that don’t make him bias
@@Will-bn9km my friend read my comment again. I don’t think you will read the word “bias” in there even once.
So I have no idea why you brought up bias.
@@Will-bn9km the point as, that these are not conspiracy theories… they’re just random conjectures from university atheist scholars, with like 2 “conspiracy theories” chalked in there.
If he wanted to make a video like this that’s totally fine, but to advertise it to viewers as conspiracy theories? Intellectually dishonest
Thank you
For The People!
Very interesting how much of Meso Amerocan history is forgotten and unknown.
What was wrong with BC (vs bce)
Population control because if we are aware that we can live longer through understanding of what we are consuming, we would all move different
I'm movin different.
we are aware people are just so brainwashed to the point where they dont mind if they eat cancer
Lol 2012 wasn’t a dumb Hollywood idea. For YEARS people thought 2012 was age end of the world
And where did that craze exactly stems from
Couldn’t tell you the last time I heard # being called pound
kalapa is just "visual snow"
look it up
a "condition" that i actually have
> "darkest theories
> "morality is subjective"
?
the unaverse is shaped like a four leaf clover
never found a four leaf clover.. unlucky
Just to clarify, we (Christians), (not Catholics) do not believe in 3 gods. We believe in 1 God. The Trinity is the three persons of God Almighty. The Holy Spirit, Jesus the Son of God, and God the Father all in one. One God, not three.
its still an ongoing argument
Catholics are Christian. You mean protestant?
Man, sorry but no matter what overly complicated way you find to explain it, 3 persons are 3 persons
@@Tijaxtolan nevermind
@@Fish_tank75 that's modalism my friend
0:10 the greatest debate in history isn't morality, is the existence of god/gods
morality relates to god same thing
@@nintendo64zzz being related doesn't mean it's the same thing
about morgan & morgan are they available for European ?
The Big "Bing".
Aye I never got this in my subscription feed. And it looks like it’s not performing at the level of most of your other videos. Might wanna look into it, I think you got shafted by a TH-cam glitch on this one
yo
They
gang
bang
More please
It’s funny that every single anti-evolution theory I’ve heard has hinged around a fundamental misunderstanding of what evolution is
Why is it called "the darkest theories" while it is just a common knowledge on certain degree ?
First religion was.....numberology.
The Big Bing
T-cell, huh?