ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 มี.ค. 2017
- seedbed.com
Seedbed's mission is to gather, connect, and resource the people of God to sow for a great awakening. // Find out more and join the awakening journey! seedbed.com
CLICK FOR MORE VIDEOS & RESOURCES LIKE THIS ONE
What is the gospel? Most people in the church will mention something about the death of Jesus, the forgiveness of sins, and spending eternity in heaven. In today's Seven Minute Seminary, Dr. Scot McKnight affirms that all of these are truths to be found in the Bible. However, he uses key texts to demonstrate that the gospel preached by the apostles focused primarily on the life, death, burial, and the resurrection of Jesus.
In this way, the gospel was first and foremost about telling the story of Jesus Christ. The significance is that our presentations of the gospel move toward being Jesus-centered rather than human-centered. Because of the work of Jesus, the Holy Spirit transforms people, resulting in our justification, sanctification, and ultimately, glorification.
![[LIVE] ใครคุยเรื่องบอล "พ่องตาย" #คุยให้เด็กมันฟัง EP.43 (13/7/67)](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/8bHYL8RuBqs/mqdefault.jpg)
I think it is so important to hear what people like Scot McKnight and N. T. Wright are saying about the gospel. We really think we know what we mean by the word 'gospel', but we always need to keep reforming our understanding on the basis of scripture.
thank you Dr. McKnight for pointing towards the biblical gospel.
The gospel is the GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM!
Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH! God’s government ON THE EARTH! The Messiah will resurrect his people! The destiny of the Messiah and his people is to be ON THE EARTH! The renewed restored earth! God also dwelling with them! Rev 21
Jesus said the Father is the only true God!
John 17
3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent.
@@mitchellc4 amen. This is all about the kingdom to come and our allegiance to it. That is what our lives should be about. Allegiance to Christ and the gospel of Christ as King.
The more you listen to and internalize what Dr. Scot McKnight has said, you will eventually realize that it was not supposed to be 'controversial' in any sense whatsoever. His explanation about the Gospel was the unadulterated and biblical one-which is what the Gospel is in the first place.
It is all about the story of the Lord Jesus Christ to begin with. His life, death, and resurrection is the central theme of the Christian faith and all the other things are supplemental. That is not to say that those other matters are not important, we just have to realize that the whole of salvation history is Godʼs revelation of who He is as Lord and Redeemer of all.
Jesus is the one who gets all the glory in this faith we profess and live. We are loved, yes. But that is primarily due to His glorious grace, first and foremost. If it wasnʼt for His atoning sacrifice from which that grace flows from, there wouldnʼt be even any Gospel. And in that gracious atoning sacrifice comes His vicarious death and resurrection, eternally proving that He is Lord and Savior of all creation.
At the end of it all, the Gospel is about Him. May He forever be glorified for who He is and what He has done.
Soli Deo gloria!
John 3:16-18 ESV
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life. [17] For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but in order that the world might be saved through him. [18] Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only Son of God.
For some reason, Scot read that great Gospel passage in 1 Corinthians 15, but he just ignored the second part of verse 3 that says: "that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures..." So the Gospel is more than telling the story of Jesus, it is telling the story of how/why Jesus died for our sins. That's according to the Apostle Paul, who "knows what he's talking about."
I recommend you to read his book 'The King Jesus Gospel", it's definitely harder to get his point from a 7 minute video.
For me, one of the biggest issues is our understanding of the Gospel. When I left being a paramedic to be in ministry, I didn’t realize how many people misunderstand how the Bible applies to our lives! That’s why I have centered my channel on helping people understand the Bible in a practical, relevant way that keeps the true Gospel at the heart of every teaching.
Thank you Dr McKnight l have read so many long winded and varying doctrines of men on this and was getting so confused. This message is like a fresh wind of truth and grace that has blown all that away, I am truly grateful.
Thank you Scot. Your message is much appreciated.
Thank you so much for sharing this!
Gospel means GOOD NEWS! what is the Good News? That Jesus paid in full for ALL our sins!
Pauline Mid-Acts Dispensationalism will put all your puzzle pieces together perfectly. God Bless you!
Thank you, Dr. McKnight. I have been wondering how I could hear you on-line. I've finally found you on this program. Your message was honest and straight to the point. The truth on the Gospel always wins.
That is absolutely beautifully spoken!
So wise! Thank you for this!
Thank you Jesus and MOG
Excellent job,sir!
So sounds to me that most Christians confuse a theory of atonement as the gospel. Gospel is who Christ is, Christ as King, and he died for our sins (not the nitty gritty as to how, why of it, to what extend?, and so on and so forth), and He has been bodily raised from the dead. And that is the gospel.
I agree with McKnight about the Gospel being a very straightforward testimony of who the Messiah was and did, obviously focused on his death an resurrection, but like many McKnight doesn't include the second coming as central, which I think to a apocalyptic first century Jew was as Central to what a Messiah was as the death and resurrection. Why have we overlooked this? Am k missing something?
Yep
In 2 Timothy 2:8 and Romans 1:2-4 Paul also lays out the Gospel. There is no mention of the second coming. The second coming is a crucial Christian doctrine, but it is not part of the Gospel.
Absolutely agree with this biblical definition of the gospel. However just as important as how is the gospel applied to my life. The gospel story does me no good but if it is doesn't help me. It is applied the way Paul and Peter both said it was. Repent and be baptized in the name of Jesus and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.
He is the Gospel(Ro.1:1-4)
Glad you mentioned this passage. To everyone else out there, please read it. Here Paul makes the same two core points about what the gospel is (as SM mentioned from I Timothy): First, Jesus is biologically a descendant of David. Second, that Jesus was resurrected from the dead (here in Romans 1 it is by the Holy Spirit, a foreshadowing of what Paul will return to in Romans 8:9-11). McKnight is exactly right on this topic…VERY Biblical!
So good - love this :-)
Amazing he actually gets it right...........congrats!
Amen
Thank You Jesus for Paying for All my Sins Thank You Jesus for Shedding Every Last Drop of Your Perfect Redeeming Innocent Blood For The Forgiveness Full Remission of All my Sins Thank You Jesus for Dying in my place on The Cross ✝️ ❤To Pay for All my Sins as The Perfect Sacrifice because You have No Sin Thank You for Being Buried Thank You Jesus for Coming Back ALIVE 3 Days After Your Death because You Are The Son of God and God At The Same Time!!! I LOVE You Heavenly Father ABBA I LOVE You Jesus I LOVE You Holy Spirit Not 3 Different Gods But The 1 The Only True Living GOD Most High Revealed to us in 3 Ways ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
AMEN
It's the "gospel of the kingdom" that Jesus said must be preached in all the world, not the gospel of personal salvation. The forces of darkness are not threatened by the latter, but simply go nuts with panic when the former is announced along with a demonstration of its power. That's what Jesus & his disciples did.
1Cor 15:1-9
Romans 6:1-9
Acts 2:38
Peter answers the "What" question and Paul answers the "Why" question.
This is how the gospel saves a believer.
Pleaaase make this subtitles available in spanish, I would love to share this with my seminary students!
He opens the bible, and instead of going to the words of Jesus, he goes to Paul. Why can't the gospel of Jesus be preached, that, is to go into the whole world, instead of that multiple gospel, ABOUT Jesus? Matthew 24:14
Amen the Torah of Yeshua is the Good News
Jesus says he came for the sinners, not the self righteous. Jesus says repent and believe! The gospel Paul says is remembering what he preached! What did he preach? He preached we are all born sinners and haters of God, we must repent turn away from sin and believe on the finished work of Christ on the cross, that Jesus Christ is God in the flesh, He died for our sins and was raised in three days, He ascended into heaven and prepared a place for all who surrender to Him!
I would say this is a very short-sighted explanation of the gospel. The Bible tells us that Isaiah preached the gospel, John the Baptist preached the gospel, and Jesus preached the gospel before His death, burial, and resurrection.
So we know there is definitely more components to the gospel. I usually oversimplify it by saying the components of the Good News are
1. Resurrection of the dead
2. Deliverance from sin (New Heaven/New Earth)
3. Removal of the wicked and rewards for the righteous (Eternal Judgment)
4. Kingdom of God established on the earth
And that the death, burial, & resurrection of Jesus is the central cornerstone of these components and stamps a realized hope on these future events to take place on the Day of the Lord.
The people in Corinth would have already understood these components because Paul preached in Jewish synagogues. Jesus is the New News but the original components of the gospel from the Old Testament/Tanakh remain the same.
Jesus is the Gospel(Ro.1:1-4)
Nice video despite the inaccuracies. Please handle the word of truth as it is, Truth. Please be more attentive to being accurate next time. Nice final statement on the end.
Can you address the Power Gospel? The Gospel of Power has entered our denomination, with the influence of Bethel Church and Bill Johnson, and is taught from some pulpits by some pastors and evangelists. Quote from Nazarene evangelist 08.08.2019 is a good example: "So the real gospel is the miracle power, the dutumas, and the salvation, healing, deliverance, not just being good enough to go to heaven, but be empowered enough to bring heaven to earth."
Waiting Seedbed!
Sir, you missed the MOST IMPORTANT PART of Paul's definition of Gospel in 1Cor.15:1-4- "ACCORDING TO THE SCRIPTURES (O.T.)" and most important part of 2 Tim.8-9 - "ACCORDING TO MY GOSPEL in v.8- THE WORD OF GOD in v.9" Gospel is the word of God (promise or prophecy) being fulfilled !!
It's too bad you didn't actually read his book...
After the outpuring of the Holy Spirit, the gospel was preached by the apostle Peter. What is it? Acts 2:22-40 records it. Stephen preached the same gospel in Acts 7:2-4 before the ears of Saul of Tarsus (who is also called Paul). Paul received this gospel and together with Barnabas preached the same gospel after the Holy Spirit set them apart and were sent for the ministry. Kindly read Acts 13:16-41 and see what gospel they preached.
What’s so odd about this is....in his very first biblical example he quotes 1 Corinthians 15 and rightly notes THIS IS THE CENTRAL thing. Then he reads it and it says-literally: “that Christ died for our sins...”. But, having set it up by downplaying the atoning part of the gospel he hydroplanes over the fact that “he died for our sins” is the central defining statement of the very thing he just read. I agree that the gospel is the telling of the story of Jesus but Paul and others very directly say (MCKnight read it!) he died FOR OUR SINS is central to the story of Jesus. McKnight’s approach here is just strange imo
Go back and read the sermons in Acts. Jesus dying for our sins was something He did...the Gospel is about who Jesus IS - which is bigger than any one single event.
@@ApostolicChristianity It's hard to envision how the sermons in Acts can be used to make the point. The culminating point of Peter's sermon on the Day of Pentecost was the crucifixion and resurrection. Except for the brief words we have recorded to the people at Lystra, it seems patently obvious that the life, death and (especially) the resurrection of Jesus was the early church's central theme (which Paul confirms in 1 Cor. 15). That doesn't take away from it being about who Jesus IS. The resurrection was presented as the authenticating of the claim. They didn't separate the concepts. Luke even calls that summarizes Paul's "custom' in Acts 17 -- saying he normally went to the synagogues and provided evidence that the Christ had "to suffer and rise from the dead". I think McKnight is in error when he comes across as taking away our attention from these central actions of Jesus.
@@bretnicholson But what if he's not "taking away our attention" but rather refocusing out attention thus placing everything in its proper place? The only issue I have with McKnight is that he fails to be specific. Peter's culminating point is in verse 36 of chapter 2: "Therefore let all the house of Israel know assuredly that God has made this Jesus, whom you crucified, both Lord and Christ." Jesus is Lord and Christ - if you're interested you can go to my channel where I've done a study on the sermons in Acts.
Chip Lutyk I’d say in what I heard from him, he’s not putting things in their proper place. It sounds like a trade when I listen to him. Sure, who Jesus IS is the ultimate goal, but I see no evidence in the NT that who he is and what he did are seperate. They are joined. That’s why (in my view) the emphasis on the resurrection in Acts. His Lordship is confirmed by His resurrection. In short, I’m suspicious of anyone who seems to downplay that importance. Frankly, I think the modern church doesn’t emphasize it enough (compared to the early church). Maybe that colors my view of McKnight. But, ironically, studying and teaching on Acts (along with 1 Corinthians 15) is what did it to me.
@@bretnicholson Forget McKnight then. I don’t pay much attention to him anyway. Just came here to find some people interested in recovering the Gospel of the Kingdom. You’re always welcome to swing by my channel - th-cam.com/video/RY9K90ARgcg/w-d-xo.html (Apostolic Preaching: The Ancient Kerygma)
Doesn't it say in the Gospels somewherre that Jesus preached the gospel? If so, what, then, was he preaching?
Matthew 6:33
Matthew 24:14
@@Chris_Sheridan Thanks Chris, I knew that though. Perhaps you think Jesus' proclamation of the Kingdom should be called 'the Gospel'? It's not exactly what we call the Gospel; or rather, we add the death and resurrection...
@@grantbartley483 .. many churches have become apostate and lost the message that Jesus taught - note how Jesus exposed the Jewish religious leaders in the first century for their hypocrisy and failure to teach people the truth about God's kingdom.
The 'Gospel' accounts centre on Jesus' preaching and teaching - 'gospel' comes from the Greek term, meaning "good news" - all Christians follow Jesus example and teach what he declared as "good news" - namely, the "good news of the kingdom" - the kingdom represents God's rulership and sovereignty - Christians pray for God's kingdom to rule over the earth, bringing God's will to be done "as in heaven, also on earth". - Matthew 6:10
"Let your Kingdom come. Let your will take place, as in heaven, also on earth."
Jesus gave first priority to the kingdom - he taught about the kingdom more than any other subject. - Matthew 6:33
“Keep on, then, seeking first the Kingdom and his righteousness, and all these other things will be added to you."
Note that Jesus was referring to God's righteousness, not his own.
Luke 4:43
But he [Jesus] said to them: “I must also declare the good news of the Kingdom of God to other cities, because for this I was sent.”
Luke 8:1
Shortly afterward he [Jesus] traveled from city to city and from village to village, preaching and declaring the good news of the Kingdom of God. And the Twelve were with him,
Matthew 4:23
Then he went throughout the whole of Galʹi·lee, teaching in their synagogues and preaching the good news of the Kingdom and curing every sort of disease and every sort of infirmity among the people.Luke 8:1
Shortly afterward he traveled from city to city and from village to village, preaching and declaring the good news of the Kingdom of God. And the Twelve were with him,
Matthew 4:23
Then he went throughout the whole of Galʹi·lee, teaching in their synagogues and preaching the good news of the Kingdom and curing every sort of disease and every sort of infirmity among the people.
There is only one 'gospel' (good news) message - the one that Jesus taught - the apostles followed Jesus' example:
Acts 8:12
But when they believed Philip, who was declaring the good news of the Kingdom of God and of the name of Jesus Christ, both men and women were getting baptized.
All Christians make public declaration of "this good news of the kingdom" - Jesus commanded his followers to spread the 'gospel' worldwide ..
Matthew 24:14
And this good news of the Kingdom will be preached in all the inhabited earth for a witness to all the nations, and then the end will come.
Until John the baptizer, there was preaching of repentance in preparation of accepting the Messiah, Jesus Christ - then the kingdom became the main proclamation.
Luke 16:16
“The Law and the Prophets were until John. From then on, the Kingdom of God is being declared as good news, and every sort of person is pressing forward toward it."
Those that do not press forward with the teaching of the Kingdom of God, have lost the essence of Christian teaching.
"Also, in all the nations, the good news has to be preached first." - Mark 13:10
Preaching brings persecution - Jesus foretold this:
verses 11-13,
"And when they are taking you to hand you over, do not be anxious beforehand about what to say; but whatever is given you in that hour, say this, for you are not the ones speaking, but the holy spirit is. 12 Furthermore, brother will deliver brother over to death, and a father a child, and children will rise up against parents and have them put to death. 13 And you will be hated by all people on account of my name. But the one who has endured to the end will be saved."
The churches of Christendom fail to proclaim the kingdom of God - they are spiritually dead - the masses that attend church have been misled - they do not enter the kingdom - same situation as in Jesus' day.
Matthew 23:13
“Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! because you shut up the Kingdom of the heavens before men; for you yourselves do not go in, neither do you permit those on their way in to go in."
The clergy of Christendom are bloodguilty for failure to teach a life-saving message.
1 Corinthians 9:16
Now if I am declaring the good news, it is no reason for me to boast, for necessity is laid upon me. Really, woe to me if I do not declare the good news!
1 Timothy 4:16
Pay constant attention to yourself and to your teaching. Persevere in these things, for by doing this you will save both yourself and those who listen to you.
I'll start by saying that we are bought by the sacrifice and blood of Christ. Then I'll say read John 3:16 and following verses. It says GOD so loved the world..... Then in Acts 2:23 and 1 Peter 1:17 - 21 we see again that it was through GOD'S predetermined purpose and foreknowledge from before the foundation of the world that Christ would come. In Genesis 3:14-15 it says GOD laid out his plan to redeem mankind in Christ. In Genesis 22:18 we see GOD promising that all nations would be blessed through the seed of Abraham. Which is Christ. Throughout the rest of the Old Testament we see GOD's plan to save mankind. And in the New Testament we see the fullfillment of that plan in Christ. There are a multitude of other scriptures to point to. But through it all we see the Gospel is defined and shown to be God's love and plan to redeem man. Think of it this way, the Gospel is the story that GOD the father wrote with Christ as the main character. But this Gospel story was written and directed by GOD the father for man. The Gospel is God's love for man and his plan from before the begining to redeem man.
It's called contextualization bud. You should know this, Paul did the same thing.
The gospel for the Ist C Jews was 'Messiah has come'. For Paul the resurrection is the proof that Jesus of Nazareth is the Messiah. Rom 1.4
The Gospel in Jesus words:
John 3:16-18 ESV
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life. [17] For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but in order that the world might be saved through him. [18] Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only Son of God.
What happens to people who don't "believe in him,' Eric?
@@IsaacNussbaum Revelation 20:11 on & Matthew 24 and 25
@@IsaacNussbaum If you want to go without going thru Grace, you must face the judgement. Matthew 5:20, meaning you must fulfill the Law (and the Sermon on the Mount Matt. 5 thru 7), which only Jesus could and did.
@@ericmuetterties1984 O.K., they face judgement. Then what?
@@IsaacNussbaum If you read Revelation 20, just keep reading. I am not sure what you motive is, but if you are really asking for a sincere answer, may I ask why you are asking?
7:09 No!!! They are not all four called gospels. Matthew calls itself the book of the genealogy of Jesus Christ, not the Gospel. Luke calls itself a narrative written down for an individual person. John does not call itself anything, but just starts into writing. MARK is the only one that calls itself the beginning of the Gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God. All four are titled the same in the Greek manuscript: "According to..." Matthew, Mark, Luke, John. It does not say "The Gospel According to.." or "The Gospel Account of..." or "The Gospel of ..." NO! The four books are NOT the Gospel(s).
Jesus is Lord God Almighty clothed in unsinful humanity and He is the author of "eternal life" to all who trust Him alone for salvation.
That is everlasting life, not to be confused with temporary or probationary life dependant upon your performance.
This means that saving repentance is realizing that you are a sinner deserving of God's just punishment in Hell and turn (repent) from whatever you trusted in before, if indeed you trusted in anything; to trusting in the person and finished work of Christ "alone" for salvation.
How can you possibly trust Christ alone for salvation when you are also trusting in your performance?
You absolutely can't.
2:35 You've just admitted that this statement of Paul's is NOT equal to the Gospel. It is a SUMMARY of the Gospel. There is much more to the Gospel and he even says that he taught them before and this is now a SUMMARY, not a complete statement of what it is, for it is much larger than these few summary statements. 3:06 and you just contradicted what you read, for you left off the witnesses in your own summary of what you read (though you read some of the witnesses), which Paul includes in the mere Summary, let alone the full teachings he gave them. Without the witnesses you do not have the Gospel. 3:40 in 2 Timothy you give an even more terse SUMMARY. Paul is drawing attention to 2 points from his WHOLE GOSPEL, for it says "You must be remembering Jesus Christ, having woken himself up from out of the dead ones, from out of the seed of David, in synchronicity with my gospel." He intentionally constructs the two the same in repetition: from out of the dead ones, from out of the seed of David, to indicate that the Jews were dead in their sleep, while also indicating that Jesus Christ came from David as a direct descendant. This is not a statement of WHAT the Gospel is. It is one aspect among Paul's teachings of the WHOLE GOSPEL. It absolutely does not say in the Greek that "this is my gospel." It is the preposition "kata", according to or in synchronicity with... my gospel. There is no equation here in the Greek at all, but an identification as one among many other elements that are not mentioned. In addition there is another problem...
There is indication that the Gospel was this: "The time is filled up in what was lacking! And the Kingdom of God is at hand. Repent and believe in the Gospel!" For this is what Mark 1.14-15 says Jesus came preaching and it is called "the Gospel of the Kingdom of God." So the Gospel must include this as the capstone. It is troubling that Paul's summary in 1 Corinthians 15 does not, when you think of it. However, that proves that Paul's summary is a selective one, not even an accurate or complete summary, but a slice of it that was brought back to memory to the Corinthians in order for Paul to go on with his teaching on resurrection. It is important to keep these passages in context in order to understand their function and why they are not a formula to be taken out of context.
This is such an oversimplification of the facts. One of the first times the New Testament mentions "the gospel" is records that Jesus went about preaching the gospel of the kingdom. Law of First Mentions requires that the first mention of something sets the tone and basis for everything else mentioned in following. So where is "of the kingdom" in his basic essence explanation? McKnight also say that Jesus will come to reign... My bible says He currently reigns and that the kingdom of God is now, not just eventually. So again, McKnight sells the gospel of Jesus Christ short in a different way than typical Evangelicals.
Is your only contact with Scot?
Ironic, this channel that promotes the heresy that a born again can "lose" salvation. Might want to try actually believing the gospel before preaching it.
John Trevett Is really everything a heresy nowadays?
Hiddetje van der Waal
No, only heresy is heresy. The time will come where they will not endure sound doctrine. Guess this is that time.
The biblical teaching of apostasy is demonstrably seen in the teachings of Jesus, Paul, and elsewhere in the NT. Those who depart from the faith and are cut off from the tree of life are those who once believed but later turned to unbelief.
Regardless of this doctrines truth, however, is the fact that this is hardly a doctrine worthy of calling another brother or sister a heretic. One can without question believe Jesus as Lord and that he rose from the dead and be wrong in this theology. To throw around the word heretic flippantly is dangerous to say the least.
Anything that teaches a born again believer can "lose" salvation IS heresy. I would argue anyone that goes into unbelief was never born again to begin with.
Well then I guess I, and many other individuals who believe Jesus is Lord and Savior, are heretics, according to your standards, as we would believe a person can depart from the faith. I think the biblical data is clear on the issue. But you are more than welcome to call whomever you wish a heretic.
Peace, brother
Amen