The Plaintiff was very smart and strategic in coming to The People’s Court with this case, She just created a huge buzz for her product on a very large platform for FREE! I wish her the best.
This is what I wondering! I only saw the YT short. I guess it's for sleeping, my daughter straightens her hair, so it would be great for her. But for me- I wanna wear it all day as an accessory! 😍
@@dg1593 it's because she has on black stockings with the white pumps! That's a fashion no no! She's a beautiful smart young lady, I wish her the best.
Her families story of their immigration to America, and how they were raised is a beautiful story. If I'm not mistaken she wrote a book about her history, and her life.
I am not at all a Crafter! I am Glad the Lady got Refunded her Money.. I do feel there was something Sketchy about Alberto who couldn't even appear in person & the Poor communication & instructions were really vague.. I really don't understand what or why this happened.. the Father of the daughter who doesn't speak English.. I Kind of feel Sad & Sorry for him...& feel like his Daughter either is Overwhelmed with keeping up with Both Orders & Quality.. did this hapoen because they were trying to Quickly Mass produce multiple orders & did not Factor in Quality Checks for extra sample work.. I thought the Judge was going to Give a 70-75% Verdict to the Designer.. as there has to be some responsibility with Clearer Communications & Specific request to "Please do a full 1 piece Sample" before Cutting out all the pieces"
@@whereloveblossomswhy do you feel bad for the Dad when the judge was speaking Spanish directly to him? They ppl should have called the designer and said do you want it like the prototype sample of option 3 that’s written down on the paper pattern.
I can only hear the case there is no picture. If they cut the sample on the bias they should have told her. It makes a difference in the fit. Cutting on the bias would make it have more give. All product created after should be cut the same because that is wht she approved.
Agreed The manufacturer failed to communicate with their client about their concerns from the get go. They should have informed her if the fabric for the prototype was not enough, ot that they cut it a certain way different from the pattern. Or, that the pattern did not indicate cutting instructions adequately. Or, whatever else they were concerned about. I have worked with CMT (cut, make, trim) businesses (they make small orders) and it is imperative to provide a first sample for the client to approve - it must match the prototype. Some people don't care enough about their business reputation or the clients satisfaction to put their concerns in writing or to take that extra step - it's all about them getting the order to make money. Sad and shortsighted 😢.
Exactly that’s what I was saying, why would you cut the priorities perfect and it was approved and then turn around and cut it differently for the actual product
I think deep inside the defendant know she made a mistake. the problem i think is lack of communication. Knowing this is a product, the defendant should have communicated to the plaintiff that they actually did the sample differently and discussed the issue. the other problem is probably the person who proceeded to do the production run was not involved with the initial communications with the plaintiff. Even small mom and pop operations suffer from lack of communications. :(
Wow...this young lady is exactly what Judge Millian said she is: a GENIUS! And besides that, she is gorgeous! What an amazing product she designed! I cannot wait until this hair wrap is available for purchase! Definitely going to get one.
This whole thing makes absolutely no sense. If she approved a prototype, why would you make something different? Even if the pattern was incorrect, call her and alert her so that you can reproduce the prototype that she approved. They just were careless.
Literally this. Or, when you realize you can save fabric if you cut it differently, CALL YOUR CUSTOMER AND RUN IT BY THEM, then make a second SINGLE prototype and have it approved. The defendant in this case has me raging over here 😂
Because they went based off the blue sample when they gave her the prototype which is a single unit. When they are going to mass produce, they lay down the fabric on top of itself in many layers and use the pattern to cut out at the same time. When they used the pattern, the instructions were incorrect and when the assembled it it didn’t turn out right. They actually paid and have her free labor when they told her how the pattern should be cut.
@@CarmenBuenrostroyes but they were supposed to make a sample after the prototype, they shouldn’t of staked the fabric and got it ready for mass production bc she literally asked for another sample first, IF they would’ve done what she asked, then they would’ve only made one more, again like she asked them to do(not a bunch more), they could’ve called her and let her know the problem and boom no lost money
First of all, I need one of these hair wraps!! The plaintiff did not waste her 24 minutes of fame at all🙌🏾 Perfect example of turning lemons into lemonade 🥂 Secondly, Judge Milian is a whole BOSS. Came through with the effortless translation😍 We love to see it 🔥
Very rude the girl didn't talk out of turn she answered and confirmed everything the judge asked of her out was almost like she really didn't want to give the girl her money, so confused as to why judge snapped on her at the end
I purchased the Samarai Wrap during a Christmas sale and I LOVE it! Worth every penny. I recommend watching the tutorial on TH-cam, I was wrapping it incorrectly the first few days but once I figured it out it is a game changer.
Plantiff's outfit is legit PERFECT businesswoman material! Not too flashy, but also not too plain. She didn't even have on excessive makeup or jewelery! She's definitely a sharp dresser and has a super classy style here. (I honestly love seeing women who can rock outfits like this. :P Guys too, but y'know. xD)
This was a good case! Professionals w/ alot of knowledge on both side. They were both good ppl that appeared like they had good intentions but due to lack of communication and errors things just didn't work out.
The defendant is such an angel, and the plaintiff is also a sweetheart. Both are laudable litigants and are models for the rest of us who may one day appear in civil court.
I think the defendant messed up. That's why she offered her 50%. I think her father was the expert and she was trying to continue the family business but not wasn't as experienced.
That Spanish switch was amazing 😂😂😂😂 I'm so impressed by the Judge.. I was so happy to see Language being used as means of communication not to undermine any other nationality
@@richard4324-r5k She spoke Spanish before she even spoke English lol, she started speaking English at 6. Listening to her accent it's truly Cuban Spanish accent as well 😂 us latinos grow up with both english and Spanish in the US so it's not shocking
@@lenasr5792 she only speaks English on the show correct? Exactly, someone who doesn’t speak Spanish is not paying attention or catching on to her “Cuban accent”.
Rule of thumb when sewing: Measure twice, cut once. They should've verified with her to make sure that everything was precise and correct before they cut all that fabric.
I still can't believe they didnt double check after the second pattern was cut with the grain instead of against. Because now, they have two different outcomes.
My only guess is that the show edits out a good portion of the case to make it shorter and more interesting, cause that made no sense why the Judge did that
Yeah, that was so… weird. I understand you’re not supposed to speak unless you’re spoken to and it’s a strict rule, but she didn’t even give her a warning all episode (unless it was edited out)
What she was trying to say but couldn't get out is that they had a blue one already cut out, which is what was used to make the prototype. Which also goes to say that their cut out one did not match the pattern that was brought in, according to industry standards (regarding the grain). They are both at fault. They gave the company a different pattern for the prototype. The company should have double-checked since the patterns were different.
@@Call_Em_Yall Then you didn't understand the case. The plaintiff *loved* how it was cut for the prototype, therefore it should be cut that way. HOWEVER, they were supposed to make a sample, which they did, yet they did that sample AND cut the ENTIRE fabric before asking for approval of said sample. For some reason, they backtracked on what the plaintiff liked all of a sudden, which is what the Judge asked about, but they kept dodging it. The fault only falls on the defendant, hence why she kept going in circles. They knew they should've gotten the sample APPROVED by her first, but they proceeded to cut everything without permission. It's the whole purpose of creating a sample. And that's why the verdict didn't end up as the costs being shared, but the plaintiff winning everything instead. Because if BOTH were at fault, they would've shared the damages.
Exactly. Whenever Milan doesn't get an excuse to yell, insult, slap the podium and hammer the gavel..... like in this case where both the plaintiff and the defendant were both pleasant and respectful of each other.... then she has to create an opportunity to do so. That's why I can only watch her in doses because otherwise I end up yelling and cussing at her through the screen. She is a loud, boisterous, rude woman. There was one case where the defendant was as soft spoken and respectful as she could be. Milan just started yelling at the woman. You could literally see her wince from Milian's foghorn volume. The first few times she took it but finally the defendant told her that she could hear her and she didn't have to keep yelling. Oh what did she say that for..... Milan melted down, flapping her arms, sqwawking like a chicken laying an ostrich egg.....I thought her head was gonna spin in a360. She worked herself up and then just told her to get out. The hypocrisy........ it's ok for her to yell, shout, belittle people, verbally abuse, insult and disrespect people and if they speak in their own defense, she gets offended... like how dare you not be my punching bag and let me verbally abuse you. I would never go on that show because the moment she hollered at me, my episode would not be able to air once I got done flipping over podiums, throwing microphones, flinging water pitchers, and breaking that gavel in two pieces. She'd be running to the back with that robe flapping in the wind as that gavel flew past her! 😅😅😅😅😂😂😂😂
Because she only half listens. I like this show because the cases are interesting but can’t stand the way JM overtalks everyone and doesn’t give them time to speak
10:03 No, a tailor is not the male version of a seamstress. It annoys me when people dont know what theyre talking about and want to correct someone. He would be a seamster. And for this product, a seamster would be appropriate. Not a tailor.
Can you please define "tailor" versus "seamster"? What, then, would be the female counterpart to a tailor? I realize I could just turn to Google, but I prefer to engage with others in conversation, when possible... ❤ Thank you! Much Love via Houston, TX!
@@KatherineWooten-s9b tailor is a neutral term, men and women can be a tailor. Also a tailor will work more with altering existing clothes to fit a client (with a heavier lean to formal wear such as suit jackets) whereas seamster/seamstress will do more all-rounder work and constructing garments from scratch. There is a lot of overlap between these two jobs as well but the key difference is a tailor works more specifically with formal clothing
I knew the judge spoke Spanish, I’ve heard her say a couple phrases over the years but to hear her speak full on Spanish and translate was interesting! 😎
I’m convinced that this plaintiff is the first person to appear on a court tv show that actually knows what is acceptable to wear to court. Someone get her a plaque. 🤣
Plaintiff’s product is quite nice, and I wish her success 💛 I’m also rooting for the defendants and their business, they made a mistake but look like hard working people 💚
The fact that the judge was like “nah I got this” age started speaking perfect Spanish and also translating it just blew me away. I need to just shake her hand
I was trying to give the benefit the doubt to the defendant. She said a whole lot of things but didn't always answer the questions the judge was asking. She knew they were supposed to make a sample first to be approved. A sample is not just to get the sewing right. It needs to be approved. If they didn't follow the pattern and she approved the one that they didn't follow the pattern they should have verified with her first and asked if she wanted them to follow the pattern or cut it the way they did for the one the gave her.
A production sample is just getting the sewing right. The initial sample is the idealized version that gets more attention, the production sample is what's actually getting shipped out the door when you have four people sewing them together and is done during the process. It's lower quality unless you're paying for the best quality. A lot of confusion during this trial were about the three samples: The blue prototype, the red prototype, and the production sample. Now, you are completely correct that if the tailor didn't do the prototype right the tailor should have confirmed which route they wanted to go.
I think the defendant just didn't know how to explain what she was trying to say. I also sew, and what I gathered that I feel judge Milan missed is that there was no pattern to follow when they made the prototype from the tailors sample, which was cut differently than the pattern instructions he actually provided. Thats poor communication on the tailors part, and a lesson learned for the company to confirm these things before making such a grave mistake, even though the tailor had partial responsibility in the mistake as well. As the defendant said, the production sample is in fact just for the sewing, and the rest can be made and shipped without prior approval.
@@Kayla-hw6hx as someone who also sews I agree with this. The judge just didnt understand enough although she did a great job unless you sew theres a few things that just wont click per say.
I also sew and the judge did not understand how the process works. It would be cost prohibitive to cut single samples after approval. The tailor made a bad pattern, he confused cross grain with straight grain and should have been clearer with his marking when drafting the pattern. The production company should have clarified that the pattern did not match the sample. Both are to blame IMO.
Also, I have *never* seen a pattern with markings on two sides. If someone gave me a pattern and I opened it and saw sharpie on one side, it would never occur to me to flip it over and look on the other side for pencil marks. They should have been clear with the client that the initial ‘prototype’ was not cut according to the pattern instructions written in sharpie OR they should have told her that she did not supply enough fabric to make the prototype according to the pattern. That was their mistake. It was not a mistake to cut all the fabric after approval and before a production sample.
I think it was a simple misunderstanding. The line with the G is meaning the grain goes this way and the sharpie line is the direction you cut it (against the grain). However, the Defendants thought the line with the G was the way you cut it (with the grain). The tailor said that when he saw the prototype, he thought they understood how to cut it.
The stretch is everything in this situation. They should have made sure, especially because the pattern was was different. That's why you call yourself a professional. And it was a genius idea, and the demonstration was the proof.
I love seeing black inventors capitalizing on their brilliance. Yes! 😩👩🏾🔧💕 Edit: IDK what's wrong with ya'll but if being happy about a positive contribution from black people is racist then I'm racist _every day_ of my life. Have fun being miserable and picking fights over nonsense. Edit: Had fun debating with all ya'll. I've said all I have to say. Bye! Lmao. 😂👌🏾 10/05/21
@@sdays59 Yeah, inventions can also be taken by immoral means too though. Black history is full of them. The legal system was not set up to protect black people in the US. (Not saying you're wrong though. 👍🏾)
Her head wrap sounds fantastic. The prototype she demonstrated was beautiful. The defendant, in spite of the issue that came up seemed, genuinely kind. I wish them both well (& will be watching for the Headwrap to hit the market
At the end when the judge says “you really need to know when to stop”…. I don’t think she realized what the plaintiff said. All she did was agree with her, that that’s what she was asking for. That’s why the plaintiff was so taken aback by her response.
That's not why. She was gloating. She knew she had won and was rubbing it the defendant's face. That's why she got checked. The judge isn't dumb, she realized her attitude was getting arrogant and she wasn't having it. It was educating to see her get checked like that, trying to be friends with a judge. Big no no. Just because someone wins is no reason to act like she did.
@@madi4481 She was still talking over her, interrupting and gloating while she was ruling. That's a huge no no. She needed to get checked in front of millions to learn that's not how to behave in court and a lesson. Now she knows. Lesson learned.
This judge is amazing to me!!! I've been binge-watching her for the past few days and likely will continue to do so. I LOVE her!!!! Beautiful, and scary-intelligent with a great personality and presence!!
I think the defendants were trying to explain what the industry standards are, but JM didn't let them complete a single SENTENCE..😳 Plaintiff's bonnet & business is amazing!!🤩
Jm don’t allow anyone to talk. I think she make up her mind who she likes before the case even starts. I notice she do that to a lot of people. I wonder if she do it for ratings.
@@sknstx The judge told the defendant she understood what she was telling her. The judge is saying the defendant did the sample one way that the plaintiff loved and did the prototype a different way which she did not like. She wanted the original sample. The defendant was saying we alter the sample to our liking so we need credit. The prototype was the plaintiff original idea. But they told the plaintiff after they cut her fabric that she paid for the prototype. That’s a lack in communication which becomes the defendants fault. When they gave her the sample she loved that was their opportunity to say hey, we actually changed some things that will costs you more. Instead they made her believe it was her original prototype.
This is just wonderful! And the fact that Judge Marylin let her prompt her products is great! I will be buying this when I see it in stores as soon as she gets it out there.
Yep bad decision on the defendants part to not get all the approvals especially after knowing it was cut differently then the pattern states. Good on the plaintiff for fighting for her business. Wish her much success!
So professional on plaintiffs side! Freaking loved this episode between her professionalism and loving her product, judge Millian in general but her translation and everything about this case. And defendants professional attitudes too. I really liked it. You go girl!
I was surprised with the judge speaking in Spanish. That just made me want to watch her more. Also, great product. I do hope that product makes her millions. And let's not forget the daughter and father how professional they were. Great attitudes from both parties.
This judge is very overbearing, it's exhausting. Yeah you have to take control, but let people talk sometimes rather than bulldose over them. She's good at what she does, but also on an ego trip sometimes.
Take in consideration 1. She has read the complaint and defense and is aware of this entire case. 2. If she doesn't interrupt them, they start telling a long story about something that can be answered in a few words. Often a yes or no will do. 3. She only has a limited amount of time for each case, she has to shorten their stories otherwise they'd be there for many hours in each case. 4. I don't have a problem with her interrupting because I don't want to listen to either side's long-ass sob-story.
I like this Judge. She’s fair, professional yet down to earth. Plus, she doesn’t make too much of a joke during her cases like I’ve seen in other court shows.
She does have one but it’s not open yet. I literally just looked at it and it says coming soon and you can add your email so you know when she finally drops
A big part of the problem is that when you say "grain" you usually mean "straight grain" which is why they said parallel with the selvedge. The tailor meant "cross grain" which is the line that runs perpendicular to the straight grain. It is like in wood, if you have the grain lines of the wood and you cut across them. He marked the CROSS grain as "G" and didn't specify that he meant cross grain. You usually don't mark cross grain on patterns, unless you mark it as direction of stretch on knitted fabrics. You usually mark the straight grain. He should have written words rather than "G". The pattern was amateurish honestly. They should have checked. They should have pointed out that they couldn't cut the prototype the way the pattern was written (or in this case, mis-written). They should have told her (ob. in writing!) that if she approved it, she needed to be clear if they were to do it the same as the pattern OR the same as the prototype. I suspect they missed it because frankly, the pattern is very similar to a pair of stirrup pants and in pants the stretch goes the other way. So it didn't seem weird to them that the stretch went around the "body" of the garment. The reason they didn't cut one only and do a single production sample after approval is that it is not cost effective and if a client wants that they should pay extra. Cutting a single sample out is expensive. I personally believe that both are to blame. I don't think the judge was familiar with production methods.
I disagree on both at fault. She approved the sample then they created it differently. It doesn’t matter the reason. Defendant should of said We made this one different than the pattern for sure.
I wish the judge had listened to her explain grain and cross grain. How this is very important in sewing. And also agree they should have communicated more clearly.
The daughter needs to speak for herself. Parents that come to their children's defense are great, BUT you also want to make sure they can speak for themselves when you aren't around.
Why are you mad? I’d rather see cases like this, versus stupid people “borrowing or gifting money and or goods” Also that’s a really dope product. This product needs more advertising.
I want it!!! It's amazing and cute to sleep in when you're with that special person. She's well spoken and gorgeous, I wish her the best and I'll be buying when it blows up
Hope she has a patent of this amazing product. Happy she brought the product with her to demonstrate. I hated Home Economics Class and wish I didn’t, I can’t sew anything. The professional woman knows her stuff, very passionate and brilliant. I want one.
As a fashion designer I can definitely say that they cut the fabric wrong according to the pattern. That being said, the original seamster made it confusing by putting multiple directional arrows to begin with. Typically an arrow in bold marker is placed on a pattern to show which way the pattern is to be placed on the material, and the arrow will simply follow the grain of the fabric making the orientation of the piece correct. The small arrow with the G was signifying the grain of the fabric but totally unnecessary. The bold arrow was meant to show that the fabric should be cut perpendicular to the grain BUT this means that when the family turned the pattern the "correct" way the grain line (G) was now in the wrong orientation so it makes total sense to me that they would be confused. This case comes down to massive miscommunication and lack there of. I feel sorry for both sides because ultimately she came up with a fantastic product and she faced unnecessary losses - the family clearly has a lot of experience and knowledge that she doesn't have and were provided with misleading information.
Your comment seems well thought out and thorough; well-said!!👏🏽👏🏽 Great product, poor communication skills regarding the defendants. They seem like nice people, who have maintained success throughout their profession, just did not reach out for clarification purposes. Hope, this a lesson learned. Good luck to the plaintiff, hope her product was a complete success. As far as the defendants, good luck to them, as well, hope they learned from this experience and continued to thrive by implementing proper communication.
If this product becomes a huge success they will be kicking themselves for not giving her the money back for the fabric and offering to do her first new and improved batch for free. But they seem like they are a successful business and I hope they continue to be successful. Her father getting easily offended might have cost them a huge contract. Women will pay an arm and a leg for really good hair products.
Based on what you're saying they should have followed up before cutting anything. A client will always be happier to clarify than to waste time and money replacing ruined materials.
I'm confused. How did the prototype come out perfectly if they didn't understand the pattern? Oh well. Great product. She's going to be so rich. We need to invest.
The prototype came out correctly because she only gave the defendants a piece of fabric large enough to be cut the correct way. They couldn't turn it sideways to cut like how they cut all the other pieces off of the full bolt of fabric.
The Plaintiff was very smart and strategic in coming to The People’s Court with this case, She just created a huge buzz for her product on a very large platform for FREE! I wish her the best.
💯😊
I’m gonna go find her on IG actually
I want one so it worked 😭
Or, gave another company a good idea to make it better..🤭🤫🤫
@@jaygirl1148 Yup. Someones going to steal her idea.
That headwrap is cute enough to wear for more than just sleeping.
This is what I wondering! I only saw the YT short.
I guess it's for sleeping, my daughter straightens her hair, so it would be great for her.
But for me- I wanna wear it all day as an accessory! 😍
@@roxannerodriguez7075I would wear it too
I came from the short too cause I needed to know if it was meant to be worn in public!! It's so cute 😭
Oh no
3 years later, a BIG CONGRATULATIONS TO THE PLANTIFF🥳👏🏾I see these all over social media and in stores. Business is amazing!
What stores does it sell in ?
Really it's been way more than three years she went thru a lot with getting this product out there.
Stupid waste of money. Why would I need that when any scarf will do. It's not even y'all's own hair, wigs 😢
@@mufasasdaughter4831 scarfs fall off. These keep the hair in place
@mufasasdaughter4831 my natural hair is this long and I've looking for a nice scarf to wear.
The plaintiff's outfit is super cute . Good for her for creating her own product. I wish her much success.
#METOO
@@criticalthinking1592 🤣
💯😊
I don't know about those white heels. Other then that, she looks nice.
@@dg1593 it's because she has on black stockings with the white pumps! That's a fashion no no! She's a beautiful smart young lady, I wish her the best.
I love when the judge speaks Spanish. She shows how valuable it is to know more than 1 language. Plus, she translates for us english only speakers
Duh, she's of Cuban descent!
Well she is a white hispanic... of course she would speak it.
Her families story of their immigration to America, and how they were raised is a beautiful story.
If I'm not mistaken she wrote a book about her history, and her life.
@@KrazyVideoChick Is that a thing within the Hispanic community where only white Hispanics speak Spanish?
@@conniemoore4801 maybe she did not know that! I am just watching and didn’t know. No need to be so mean and rude. Entiendes!
I’m a seamstress, and never would have cut up so much fabric in a different way than the way it worked out the first time.
I am not at all a Crafter! I am Glad the Lady got Refunded her Money.. I do feel there was something Sketchy about Alberto who couldn't even appear in person & the Poor communication & instructions were really vague.. I really don't understand what or why this happened.. the Father of the daughter who doesn't speak English.. I Kind of feel Sad & Sorry for him...& feel like his Daughter either is Overwhelmed with keeping up with Both Orders & Quality.. did this hapoen because they were trying to Quickly Mass produce multiple orders & did not Factor in Quality Checks for extra sample work.. I thought the Judge was going to Give a 70-75% Verdict to the Designer.. as there has to be some responsibility with Clearer Communications & Specific request to "Please do a full 1 piece Sample" before Cutting out all the pieces"
@@whereloveblossomswhy do you feel bad for the Dad when the judge was speaking Spanish directly to him?
They ppl should have called the designer and said do you want it like the prototype sample of option 3 that’s written down on the paper pattern.
I can only hear the case there is no picture. If they cut the sample on the bias they should have told her. It makes a difference in the fit. Cutting on the bias would make it have more give. All product created after should be cut the same because that is wht she approved.
Agreed
The manufacturer failed to communicate with their client about their concerns from the get go. They should have informed her if the fabric for the prototype was not enough, ot that they cut it a certain way different from the pattern. Or, that the pattern did not indicate cutting instructions adequately. Or, whatever else they were concerned about.
I have worked with CMT (cut, make, trim) businesses (they make small orders) and it is imperative to provide a first sample for the client to approve - it must match the prototype.
Some people don't care enough about their business reputation or the clients satisfaction to put their concerns in writing or to take that extra step - it's all about them getting the order to make money. Sad and shortsighted 😢.
Exactly that’s what I was saying, why would you cut the priorities perfect and it was approved and then turn around and cut it differently for the actual product
I hope her product takes off and she makes millions, I'd love one!
ikr I would love one of those for my locs nowwwww
So far she made $34
Same! Looks like it won’t slip off at night lol
@@amyward7921 th-cam.com/video/nKdL5mD6Vrw/w-d-xo.html
I need one as well, this is definitely going to sell like hot cakes.
I love how happy she gets when the judge compliments her idea. Her hair wrap is really amazing.
For real, it seems so simple but the whole time she was putting on the wrap, I was like surprised Pikachu face
❤️
That's the whole idea anyway. I am a cutie pie so let me get on tv. Than I can run my game.
😅😅😅😊😅
Wow! She's got a website and TH-cam video with a "how to". Go girl🎉
I love how gracious the defendant was in the exit interview. Even promoting the product. Class act.
I know I totally agree very class act.
I agree 💯
Yes ,you're right they were really nice , sometime i wish the judge would chill & not seemingly yell at respectful people
That was the plaintiff
I think deep inside the defendant know she made a mistake. the problem i think is lack of communication. Knowing this is a product, the defendant should have communicated to the plaintiff that they actually did the sample differently and discussed the issue. the other problem is probably the person who proceeded to do the production run was not involved with the initial communications with the plaintiff. Even small mom and pop operations suffer from lack of communications. :(
Wow...this young lady is exactly what Judge Millian said she is: a GENIUS! And besides that, she is gorgeous! What an amazing product she designed! I cannot wait until this hair wrap is available for purchase! Definitely going to get one.
It's available starting today! $80 off too.
@@GoldenEyeLauren where? What's the official name
@@jazzyg6059 The Samarai Wrap. Theres a website and instagram page.
She's very confident about her product and indicates that in the way she presents it ..she's creator promoter and model in one ..
Why hasn't anybody clapped at her ingenious invention? I will clap!
👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏
Congratulations!
Smh I’m saying
I was also wondering why the audience didn't clap for such a good product.
👏
more than that, i gave a standing ovation for her brilliant success
There's way better head wrap inventions
This whole thing makes absolutely no sense. If she approved a prototype, why would you make something different? Even if the pattern was incorrect, call her and alert her so that you can reproduce the prototype that she approved. They just were careless.
Literally this. Or, when you realize you can save fabric if you cut it differently, CALL YOUR CUSTOMER AND RUN IT BY THEM, then make a second SINGLE prototype and have it approved.
The defendant in this case has me raging over here 😂
@@k8ness925 sometimes you can cut to save fabric but it depends on the piece and whether it or not it has to be cut on the bias.
EXACTLYYYY
Because they went based off the blue sample when they gave her the prototype which is a single unit. When they are going to mass produce, they lay down the fabric on top of itself in many layers and use the pattern to cut out at the same time. When they used the pattern, the instructions were incorrect and when the assembled it it didn’t turn out right. They actually paid and have her free labor when they told her how the pattern should be cut.
@@CarmenBuenrostroyes but they were supposed to make a sample after the prototype, they shouldn’t of staked the fabric and got it ready for mass production bc she literally asked for another sample first, IF they would’ve done what she asked, then they would’ve only made one more, again like she asked them to do(not a bunch more), they could’ve called her and let her know the problem and boom no lost money
First of all, I need one of these hair wraps!! The plaintiff did not waste her 24 minutes of fame at all🙌🏾 Perfect example of turning lemons into lemonade 🥂
Secondly, Judge Milian is a whole BOSS. Came through with the effortless translation😍 We love to see it 🔥
Yaaaaasssssss!!! (To both points! LoL)
Yes …..🙌🏾
I love this Sister‼️‼️‼️‼️ she’s intelligent articulate respectful charming innovative young gorgeous and fly 💛
Won't he do it.❤
I agree... I love it. And I need one ASAP
Wow, this product is perfect!!!! I would love one, it looks simple and I wouldn’t have to chase my bonnet or scarf in the middle of the night 🥴😂
Yyh
Right 🤣🤣
Lol
Man i got dreads i could use it
💯💯💯
lol when she said “you need to know when to stop” I was like dang… the girl was scared to verbally thank her when she said it was a great product 😂
Why did she even say that? All she was doing was affirming what the judge said... Sometimes judges have massive egos.
I love how she called the seamstress "baby" over the phone but you know she wouldn't have called him baby in her courtroom lol
@@lizzybearyfr like what i was so confused
I know that was actually so messed up. She was just confirming what the judge said, and it was very respectful and professional.
Very rude the girl didn't talk out of turn she answered and confirmed everything the judge asked of her out was almost like she really didn't want to give the girl her money, so confused as to why judge snapped on her at the end
Yessss Judge Milian for the Bilingualism. She said no need For Translation. I Got it, Hold My Gavel . 💋 💋
She likes to flex a lot 🤣
I love it
I love it! 😩❤️
Lol yes she comes from a cuban family
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 seriously!!!
I purchased the Samarai Wrap during a Christmas sale and I LOVE it! Worth every penny. I recommend watching the tutorial on TH-cam, I was wrapping it incorrectly the first few days but once I figured it out it is a game changer.
Wow. I’m glad to see a positive review. I will check it out
What's the website
@@SunkissNia the product is the samurai wrap so it should pop right up on Google or Instagram
Are they still selling these, because when I looked it up, both options were sold out, with no information about any more product coming.
That cost $90!! Oh hell nah
Plantiff's outfit is legit PERFECT businesswoman material! Not too flashy, but also not too plain. She didn't even have on excessive makeup or jewelery!
She's definitely a sharp dresser and has a super classy style here.
(I honestly love seeing women who can rock outfits like this. :P Guys too, but y'know. xD)
She ought to make some Du-rags. I’m glad she was very professional and brought receipts to make a legitimate case. This is a true business woman.
💯I agree. She presented herself well!
Man i saw that i knew off the bat is a damn good idea
Yess!!
way better than bonnets and super cute.
💜 WELL PRESENTED, GREAT IDEA! SHE WILL DO GREAT WITH HER PRODUCT & THEY WILL SELL FANTASTIC. WISH HER ALL THE BEST IN HER FUTURE ENDEAVORS ☺🙏👏👏👏💜💜💜
This was a good case! Professionals w/ alot of knowledge on both side. They were both good ppl that appeared like they had good intentions but due to lack of communication and errors things just didn't work out.
I totally agree! I didn’t get any kind of malicious vibe from either of them. I was confused when the judge snapped at her at the end though
I think the dads hard work ethic cost him this time
Yes. I enjoyed both of them & the father trained his daughter well.
@@cherubcherrycola2382 mee too....like she was only agreeing. Sometimes the judges snapping be so out of pocket...i was confusion
@@rashadhaughton22 she was interrupting the judge during her ruling. It was rude.
The defendant is such an angel, and the plaintiff is also a sweetheart. Both are laudable litigants and are models for the rest of us who may one day appear in civil court.
The pride she has when talking about her product!! I love her!!
Is her product available on Amazon?
@@stormcrider17 no it’s available on her website
I've never seen the judge so blown away and in awe of any litigant. I mean, can you blame her?
The plaintiff is stunning 🤩
The defendant has a beautiful face as well. They both are pretty ladies🎀
It was so cute, I would buy one for all my family
@@kinndah2519 The original comment spoke specifically about the plaintiff. What was your point of mentioning the defendant?
@@kinndah2519 agreed😍
@@jasmic38134 yo chill out
The plaintiff is adorable! Omg the pride of her explaining her product and after she says “cocoon” her big smile! Ps it sounds awesome
OKAY SIS BUT WHERE CAN I BUY ONE?
th-cam.com/video/nKdL5mD6Vrw/w-d-xo.html
Come thru! I came here for the same reason
text me email where do I buy?
They have a samurai wrap website now, it had a shop idk if it's operable yet though
It’s out now for $110
Black Girl Magic
+ Judge Milian speaking Spanish
+ Dope arguments
= One of my favourite peoples court cases.
Hilarious. My best friend's name is Stefan Lewis. Spelled exactly the same way.
I concur.
Agreed. I love all these women here. Judge Millan is what makes this country so great. Love Cuban Americans!
The defendant was so sweet to wish the plaintiff all the best. They seemed like such kind and honest people. I wish them all the best! Xo
I don’t think they intended to cause any issue the old man just made a mistake.
I think the defendant messed up. That's why she offered her 50%. I think her father was the expert and she was trying to continue the family business but not wasn't as experienced.
That Spanish switch was amazing 😂😂😂😂 I'm so impressed by the Judge..
I was so happy to see Language being used as means of communication not to undermine any other nationality
Right, I didn’t know she spoke any other language. She’s Cuban too
Cubans speak Spanish
@@robbewashington6959 Obviously, that’s why I said it. There are multiple countries that speak Spanish not just Cuba.
@@richard4324-r5k She spoke Spanish before she even spoke English lol, she started speaking English at 6. Listening to her accent it's truly Cuban Spanish accent as well 😂 us latinos grow up with both english and Spanish in the US so it's not shocking
@@lenasr5792 she only speaks English on the show correct? Exactly, someone who doesn’t speak Spanish is not paying attention or catching on to her “Cuban accent”.
I need her to go ahead and release this..... I need one asap
Not sure if it’s her product but it’s out there.
Buy a pair of leggings.... Duh
ASAP sis
@@marshallelliott8894 They would have to be satin/silk lined leggings. Cotton causes hair to frizz up.
@@ivybee347 Thank you... I didn't feel like explaining that. It's the details in HER creation. Not just a random pair of leggings
I loved how much the judge was giving the plaintiff her props. I wish her the best!
The plaintiff's hair is slayyed, face beat, outfit cutee aff and she's smart for coming on tv! I need one of her product ASAP!
Creator promoter and model..the Trifecta
Rule of thumb when sewing: Measure twice, cut once. They should've verified with her to make sure that everything was precise and correct before they cut all that fabric.
Yes, always measure twice and cuss once. I know it's cut...But you end up cussing a lot when you make a mistake!
@@minilea144 A LOT!!! 😂🤣😂🤣 Ask me how I know. 🤣😂
Same with building/construction.
I still can't believe they didnt double check after the second pattern was cut with the grain instead of against. Because now, they have two different outcomes.
They made it the 1st time...this court was when they done the second time. The red shirt lady messed up.
22:35 The judge cannot help herself. The girl said nothing disruptive. She simply agreed. What was that about?!
I was extremely confused! To the point that I'm looking at the comments to see if anybody agreed.
My only guess is that the show edits out a good portion of the case to make it shorter and more interesting, cause that made no sense why the Judge did that
Yeah, that was so… weird. I understand you’re not supposed to speak unless you’re spoken to and it’s a strict rule, but she didn’t even give her a warning all episode (unless it was edited out)
Exactly when I started looking a comment like this it here it was and the only one 👏🏽
Was looking for this comment, totally agree
This defendant just talking in circles knowing she messed up. Pay the lady!
What she was trying to say but couldn't get out is that they had a blue one already cut out, which is what was used to make the prototype. Which also goes to say that their cut out one did not match the pattern that was brought in, according to industry standards (regarding the grain).
They are both at fault. They gave the company a different pattern for the prototype. The company should have double-checked since the patterns were different.
@@Call_Em_Yall Then you didn't understand the case. The plaintiff *loved* how it was cut for the prototype, therefore it should be cut that way. HOWEVER, they were supposed to make a sample, which they did, yet they did that sample AND cut the ENTIRE fabric before asking for approval of said sample. For some reason, they backtracked on what the plaintiff liked all of a sudden, which is what the Judge asked about, but they kept dodging it.
The fault only falls on the defendant, hence why she kept going in circles. They knew they should've gotten the sample APPROVED by her first, but they proceeded to cut everything without permission. It's the whole purpose of creating a sample.
And that's why the verdict didn't end up as the costs being shared, but the plaintiff winning everything instead. Because if BOTH were at fault, they would've shared the damages.
I hope she becomes extremely successful and ends up with a huge line of products. She's beautiful and professional, I'm glad she won🙌
👍👏
💃💃💯
Most importantly she showed most of black woman how to talk present themselves like a boss. She is so different wellspoken entrepreneur and beautiful.
@@Tes-mm5rpshe didn't show anything except herself sthu
That harsh “you need to know when to stop” was so unnecessary. She literally just said absolutely in response to the Judge’s statement.
Exactly. Whenever Milan doesn't get an excuse to yell, insult, slap the podium and hammer the gavel..... like in this case where both the plaintiff and the defendant were both pleasant and respectful of each other.... then she has to create an opportunity to do so. That's why I can only watch her in doses because otherwise I end up yelling and cussing at her through the screen. She is a loud, boisterous, rude woman. There was one case where the defendant was as soft spoken and respectful as she could be. Milan just started yelling at the woman. You could literally see her wince from Milian's foghorn volume. The first few times she took it but finally the defendant told her that she could hear her and she didn't have to keep yelling. Oh what did she say that for..... Milan melted down, flapping her arms, sqwawking like a chicken laying an ostrich egg.....I thought her head was gonna spin in a360. She worked herself up and then just told her to get out. The hypocrisy........ it's ok for her to yell, shout, belittle people, verbally abuse, insult and disrespect people and if they speak in their own defense, she gets offended... like how dare you not be my punching bag and let me verbally abuse you.
I would never go on that show because the moment she hollered at me, my episode would not be able to air once I got done flipping over podiums, throwing microphones, flinging water pitchers, and breaking that gavel in two pieces. She'd be running to the back with that robe flapping in the wind as that gavel flew past her! 😅😅😅😅😂😂😂😂
She went Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde there 😅
It's difficult getting a product to market. I wish her the very best with her endeavors!
Website is up and running!!!
Why did she tell her she knows when to stop? All she said was “absolutely” in agreement with her 😂
Prideful, that’s why.
Yeah that was rude of her like idk why she felt the need to say that to the plaintiff
Because she only half listens. I like this show because the cases are interesting but can’t stand the way JM overtalks everyone and doesn’t give them time to speak
That made me mad like damn 😂
SO RUDE! NO REASON AT ALL TO EVEN SAY THAT TO THE PLAINTIFF. GOD BLESS HER ON HER FUTURE ENDEAVORS! SHE'S GOING TO DO FANTASTIC 😊🙏💜💜💜
10:03 No, a tailor is not the male version of a seamstress. It annoys me when people dont know what theyre talking about and want to correct someone. He would be a seamster. And for this product, a seamster would be appropriate. Not a tailor.
Can you please define "tailor" versus "seamster"? What, then, would be the female counterpart to a tailor? I realize I could just turn to Google, but I prefer to engage with others in conversation, when possible... ❤ Thank you!
Much Love via Houston, TX!
@@KatherineWooten-s9b tailor is a neutral term, men and women can be a tailor. Also a tailor will work more with altering existing clothes to fit a client (with a heavier lean to formal wear such as suit jackets) whereas seamster/seamstress will do more all-rounder work and constructing garments from scratch. There is a lot of overlap between these two jobs as well but the key difference is a tailor works more specifically with formal clothing
I have also heard people who sew called "sewests".
Turned into an episode of shark tank
I'll help you with manufacturing for 20% of the business
Lol I know right, sounds like a great product
Hair wraps aren't in my wheelhouse and for that reason I'm out
@@dantefreely5850 lol 😆 😂 🤣 that was a good one.. #sharktank
Brother, get in on it!!! Take it to market. Okay
Unfortunately it looks like she went out of business 😭 I wanted to get it
I knew the judge spoke Spanish, I’ve heard her say a couple phrases over the years but to hear her speak full on Spanish and translate was interesting! 😎
She is cuban.
@@mymobilebuddy4392 I know
@@mymobilebuddy4392 EXACTLY
Millions of people speak spanish. LOL. How is this so mind boggling.
@@KrazyVideoChick lmaoo you’re so pressed responding to everyone. not everyone knows she’s cuban.
Why do I love both of these women?! I hope her product sales are through the roof!
This solves the bonnet issue! SIS!! When can we get them! I’d wear this to work as long as the patterns are very nice. 😍
I found it on FB. She might have a website on there..... I haven't had a chance to look at the whole page.
@@ivybee347 can you post the FB page?
Somebody just posted it her name is Latoya Reno on here
It’s not meant to be worn to work that’s like wearing pajamas or a bonnet to work 🤦🏽♀️ smh.
@@merah1128 if it doesnt hurt anyone whats the problem?
Judge Milian is the reason my daughter became a lawyer : ) Wish she reads this !!!!!
I’m convinced that this plaintiff is the first person to appear on a court tv show that actually knows what is acceptable to wear to court. Someone get her a plaque. 🤣
That’s a bit of a stretch
Most women do, its the men that rarely dress appropriately
@@Kamciaga facts
Both young ladies look very nice.
Yes, except for her white shoes
I can’t wait to see her product in the store. She’s got a great thing going here.
Congratulations! You did it right.
It’s $130 but u can find a discount
Right now there about 89.50 and the limited edition one is 89.50 as well. On the website.
@@ooxds1416 what's the website?
@@ooxds1416 90??? Im good with chasing mg scarves and bonnets😭😭
@@aichatadoumbia1442 90 is way too much 🤣🤣🤣 I'm good with my Walmart and hair store bonnets 😅
Plaintiff’s product is quite nice, and I wish her success 💛 I’m also rooting for the defendants and their business, they made a mistake but look like hard working people 💚
The fact that the judge was like “nah I got this” age started speaking perfect Spanish and also translating it just blew me away. I need to just shake her hand
I was trying to give the benefit the doubt to the defendant. She said a whole lot of things but didn't always answer the questions the judge was asking. She knew they were supposed to make a sample first to be approved. A sample is not just to get the sewing right. It needs to be approved. If they didn't follow the pattern and she approved the one that they didn't follow the pattern they should have verified with her first and asked if she wanted them to follow the pattern or cut it the way they did for the one the gave her.
A production sample is just getting the sewing right. The initial sample is the idealized version that gets more attention, the production sample is what's actually getting shipped out the door when you have four people sewing them together and is done during the process. It's lower quality unless you're paying for the best quality. A lot of confusion during this trial were about the three samples: The blue prototype, the red prototype, and the production sample.
Now, you are completely correct that if the tailor didn't do the prototype right the tailor should have confirmed which route they wanted to go.
I think the defendant just didn't know how to explain what she was trying to say. I also sew, and what I gathered that I feel judge Milan missed is that there was no pattern to follow when they made the prototype from the tailors sample, which was cut differently than the pattern instructions he actually provided. Thats poor communication on the tailors part, and a lesson learned for the company to confirm these things before making such a grave mistake, even though the tailor had partial responsibility in the mistake as well. As the defendant said, the production sample is in fact just for the sewing, and the rest can be made and shipped without prior approval.
@@Kayla-hw6hx as someone who also sews I agree with this. The judge just didnt understand enough although she did a great job unless you sew theres a few things that just wont click per say.
I also sew and the judge did not understand how the process works. It would be cost prohibitive to cut single samples after approval. The tailor made a bad pattern, he confused cross grain with straight grain and should have been clearer with his marking when drafting the pattern.
The production company should have clarified that the pattern did not match the sample.
Both are to blame IMO.
Also, I have *never* seen a pattern with markings on two sides. If someone gave me a pattern and I opened it and saw sharpie on one side, it would never occur to me to flip it over and look on the other side for pencil marks. They should have been clear with the client that the initial ‘prototype’ was not cut according to the pattern instructions written in sharpie OR they should have told her that she did not supply enough fabric to make the prototype according to the pattern. That was their mistake. It was not a mistake to cut all the fabric after approval and before a production sample.
I think it was a simple misunderstanding. The line with the G is meaning the grain goes this way and the sharpie line is the direction you cut it (against the grain). However, the Defendants thought the line with the G was the way you cut it (with the grain). The tailor said that when he saw the prototype, he thought they understood how to cut it.
The stretch is everything in this situation. They should have made sure, especially because the pattern was was different.
That's why you call yourself a professional.
And it was a genius idea, and the demonstration was the proof.
I love seeing black inventors capitalizing on their brilliance. Yes! 😩👩🏾🔧💕
Edit: IDK what's wrong with ya'll but if being happy about a positive contribution from black people is racist then I'm racist _every day_ of my life. Have fun being miserable and picking fights over nonsense.
Edit: Had fun debating with all ya'll. I've said all I have to say. Bye! Lmao. 😂👌🏾 10/05/21
Love it! So proud!
True but look what happened. Always SOMEONE trying to steal ideas.
@@derinaries Sadly that's not uncommon. It the reason every name brand has a knock off or generic.
Patents are only given limited time b4 others can reinvent or copy the item.
@@sdays59 Yeah, inventions can also be taken by immoral means too though. Black history is full of them. The legal system was not set up to protect black people in the US. (Not saying you're wrong though. 👍🏾)
Product placement right in the middle of the people's court. The plaintiff is a genius.
This was a blessing in disguise. Free promo and major exposure for a much needed product and a new entrepreneur.
Her head wrap sounds fantastic. The prototype she demonstrated was beautiful. The defendant, in spite of the issue that came up seemed, genuinely kind. I wish them both well (& will be watching for the Headwrap to hit the market
I read somewhere it's out now.
I'm sad to see small business owners fighting each other in court.. best of luck to everyone involved
Exactly I felt the same way. Wish they both worked it out.
At the end when the judge says “you really need to know when to stop”…. I don’t think she realized what the plaintiff said. All she did was agree with her, that that’s what she was asking for. That’s why the plaintiff was so taken aback by her response.
No matter what she said, you're not supposed to speak while a judge is making his/her ruling. It's disrespectful and rude.
@@scribe712 Rude no. Not everyone who's not a lawyer and used to court knows such rules against their natural habit.
That's not why. She was gloating. She knew she had won and was rubbing it the defendant's face. That's why she got checked. The judge isn't dumb, she realized her attitude was getting arrogant and she wasn't having it. It was educating to see her get checked like that, trying to be friends with a judge. Big no no. Just because someone wins is no reason to act like she did.
@@madi4481 She was still talking over her, interrupting and gloating while she was ruling. That's a huge no no. She needed to get checked in front of millions to learn that's not how to behave in court and a lesson. Now she knows. Lesson learned.
@@j.d.contreras392she wasn’t gloating she was simply saying un hun as ppl do who are being told something
I sew clothes so I love these type of cases! The prom dresses gone wrong, wedding dresses gone wrong lol I live for them
Wow..
I really love what you do.
And you look beautiful though 😊😊
The very fact they cut it different from how they cut the prototype is they’re problem
I like that she got the idea pattened too
So what was your opinion on this case?
Me too! Im working on one over complicated dress for myself, I can't imagine doing it for someone else after watching these
I want her wrap!!! The judge was correct...she is a genius. Both the plaintiff and defendant are lovely women. Fair judgement
This judge is amazing to me!!! I've been binge-watching her for the past few days and likely will continue to do so. I LOVE her!!!! Beautiful, and scary-intelligent with a great personality and presence!!
Oh My Goodness sis!! Lord bless this woman to get this product on the store shelves asap! This idea is Amazing!!
I think the defendants were trying to explain what the industry standards are, but JM didn't let them complete a single SENTENCE..😳 Plaintiff's bonnet & business is amazing!!🤩
Jm don’t allow anyone to talk. I think she make up her mind who she likes before the case even starts. I notice she do that to a lot of people. I wonder if she do it for ratings.
The defendant explanation of what a production sample is was on point, the judge made a judgment a process she is not familiar with.
She was obviously bias in the hearing.
@@AshleyAshleyAshley395 it’s court and they know more than what we see
@@sknstx The judge told the defendant she understood what she was telling her. The judge is saying the defendant did the sample one way that the plaintiff loved and did the prototype a different way which she did not like. She wanted the original sample. The defendant was saying we alter the sample to our liking so we need credit. The prototype was the plaintiff original idea. But they told the plaintiff after they cut her fabric that she paid for the prototype. That’s a lack in communication which becomes the defendants fault. When they gave her the sample she loved that was their opportunity to say hey, we actually changed some things that will costs you more. Instead they made her believe it was her original prototype.
This is just wonderful! And the fact that Judge Marylin let her prompt her products is great! I will be buying this when I see it in stores as soon as she gets it out there.
Yep bad decision on the defendants part to not get all the approvals especially after knowing it was cut differently then the pattern states. Good on the plaintiff for fighting for her business. Wish her much success!
As an aspiring entrepreneur I'm super excited for her... I know the feeling she's experiencing when you know you've come up with a great idea...
I can't lie, I wish the judge would let the defence actually try answer her question..
One reason I had cut back on watching her, she cuts folks off all the time
Defendant just kept saying the same thing over and over
She asks a question and before you can answer she cuts you off or asks another question and then the shouting too......smh
@@shirleywiese5230Because she’s never able to say it the first time 😂
@@KateMich12 🤣🤣
So professional on plaintiffs side! Freaking loved this episode between her professionalism and loving her product, judge Millian in general but her translation and everything about this case. And defendants professional attitudes too. I really liked it. You go girl!
I hope the Plaintiff gets this product off the ground. This is a very good idea and could make her a millionaire
I was surprised with the judge speaking in Spanish. That just made me want to watch her more. Also, great product. I do hope that product makes her millions. And let's not forget the daughter and father how professional they were. Great attitudes from both parties.
Me too lol completely forgot her parents are Cuban 🤦🏽♀️ but yea the litigants all seem like great people
Latinos are coming thru 💙
The plaintiff is everything 🥰 beautiful, poise, well spoken. Wish her the best💕
I honestly feel bad for both sides. That poor old man looking so sad. The judge keeps cutting them off and it’s aggravating me.😭😂
The defendant is such an angel! I didn't think she was making too many comments, but the judge yelled at her and she still had such a great attitude!
First of all as a black woman as soon as she should us how the product works I started clapping! 👏🏾 that’s amazing!
Me too congratulations young lady
Innovative and beautiful woman! I applaud her and I’m Sorry the partnership didn’t work as the defendants seem nice !!
That “you need to know when to stop” was so un called for
That is GREAT idea, I wish her immense success! I have long hair that gets knotted up when I sleep, I would buy one!
th-cam.com/video/nKdL5mD6Vrw/w-d-xo.html
This judge is very overbearing, it's exhausting. Yeah you have to take control, but let people talk sometimes rather than bulldose over them. She's good at what she does, but also on an ego trip sometimes.
I think she's trying to be precise so she can understand it and determine in legal terms whats fair.
U must not watch judge judy . Im actually taking a break from her. But Milian is soooo much nicer.
Take in consideration
1. She has read the complaint and defense and is aware of this entire case.
2. If she doesn't interrupt them, they start telling a long story about something that can be answered in a few words. Often a yes or no will do.
3. She only has a limited amount of time for each case, she has to shorten their stories otherwise they'd be there for many hours in each case.
4. I don't have a problem with her interrupting because I don't want to listen to either side's long-ass sob-story.
Nah Fr cuz why’d she get mad about her saying absolutely?
@@Morenitasracing_co THANK YOU
I like this Judge. She’s fair, professional yet down to earth. Plus, she doesn’t make too much of a joke during her cases like I’ve seen in other court shows.
When she started speaking Spanish she received the crown for the baddest judge on TV 😍😍😍
Why tho🤫she is Cuban
Why, People speak different languages
I love the plaintiff's confidence when the judge compliments her product. She deserves all the success in the world. #blackgirlmagic
I hope she gets rich from her product. She is a genius. I was amazed with her demo of how it works and I'm a bald guy.
Ok, that is actually genius. Her explanation sounded complicated but it's actually super easy and flawlessly.
My jaw dropped during that demo - so effortless, such a great idea!!!!! Need one immediately!!!!
The judge is so damn intelligent and an absolute beast at what she does! She made sense out of all this which wasn't easy at all.
Beautiful black woman doing her thing. There's nothing like it..😊
this beautiful white woman needs this for her extensions
Absolutely nothing like a beautiful black woman who is doing her thing!..
I really need sis website 🙌🏾🙌🏾 she’s about to blow I wish her nothing but greatness omg
She does have one but it’s not open yet. I literally just looked at it and it says coming soon and you can add your email so you know when she finally drops
Well what’s the website
Can you tell me the website? I NEED THISSSSS! Great investment. No more messy hair at night and lays great.
Judge called the tailor "baby". That's something you don't hear everyday.
When the Judge switches back/forth from English to Spanish, it just does something to me!!!!
Then learn a 2nd language, yrslf.
@@sdays59Not sure how you determined I don't, based off that comment. I speak Portuguese as well since you're wondering.
I actually like the product. Congratulations Queenie on your business
A big part of the problem is that when you say "grain" you usually mean "straight grain" which is why they said parallel with the selvedge. The tailor meant "cross grain" which is the line that runs perpendicular to the straight grain. It is like in wood, if you have the grain lines of the wood and you cut across them. He marked the CROSS grain as "G" and didn't specify that he meant cross grain. You usually don't mark cross grain on patterns, unless you mark it as direction of stretch on knitted fabrics. You usually mark the straight grain.
He should have written words rather than "G". The pattern was amateurish honestly.
They should have checked. They should have pointed out that they couldn't cut the prototype the way the pattern was written (or in this case, mis-written). They should have told her (ob. in writing!) that if she approved it, she needed to be clear if they were to do it the same as the pattern OR the same as the prototype. I suspect they missed it because frankly, the pattern is very similar to a pair of stirrup pants and in pants the stretch goes the other way. So it didn't seem weird to them that the stretch went around the "body" of the garment.
The reason they didn't cut one only and do a single production sample after approval is that it is not cost effective and if a client wants that they should pay extra. Cutting a single sample out is expensive.
I personally believe that both are to blame. I don't think the judge was familiar with production methods.
Most intelligent comment.
I disagree on both at fault. She approved the sample then they created it differently. It doesn’t matter the reason. Defendant should of said We made this one different than the pattern for sure.
Agree 💯
I wish the judge had listened to her explain grain and cross grain. How this is very important in sewing. And also agree they should have communicated more clearly.
True but should gone with the approved sample and wrote it down but the lady already cut the pieces wrong to begin with.
The “Samurai Wrap”
Lawd. Lol 😆 get cha money maam
Umm Oprah? Diddy? Rihanna?
Why not sponsor this lady?!?
Because she doesn't need them
Why would diddy be selling wraps you need someone who is gonna use the product too not just someone who is rich or black
@@fuller8705 Jessica someone rich would endorse, they have a larger market than her? Go watch Shark Tank it’ll give you a better idea.
I usually do this with my stockings when I wear braids and didn’t realize this could be so revolutionary. Amazing
Have you gotten one already?
Because I no for a fact it will you beautiful on You.
right😭
🧢
The daughter needs to speak for herself. Parents that come to their children's defense are great, BUT you also want to make sure they can speak for themselves when you aren't around.
The People's Court has now officially entered the infomercial business KOOL NOTHING BETTER THAN FREE ADVERTISING! 💯
Why are you mad? I’d rather see cases like this, versus stupid people “borrowing or gifting money and or goods”
Also that’s a really dope product. This product needs more advertising.
@@Sixdawg06 Who on earth said I was upset find someone else to troll Sir I'm not even in the mood you take care 💯
I want it!!! It's amazing and cute to sleep in when you're with that special person. She's well spoken and gorgeous, I wish her the best and I'll be buying when it blows up
Hope she has a patent of this amazing product. Happy she brought the product with her to demonstrate. I hated Home Economics Class and wish I didn’t, I can’t sew anything. The professional woman knows her stuff, very passionate and brilliant. I want one.
As a fashion designer I can definitely say that they cut the fabric wrong according to the pattern. That being said, the original seamster made it confusing by putting multiple directional arrows to begin with. Typically an arrow in bold marker is placed on a pattern to show which way the pattern is to be placed on the material, and the arrow will simply follow the grain of the fabric making the orientation of the piece correct.
The small arrow with the G was signifying the grain of the fabric but totally unnecessary. The bold arrow was meant to show that the fabric should be cut perpendicular to the grain BUT this means that when the family turned the pattern the "correct" way the grain line (G) was now in the wrong orientation so it makes total sense to me that they would be confused.
This case comes down to massive miscommunication and lack there of. I feel sorry for both sides because ultimately she came up with a fantastic product and she faced unnecessary losses - the family clearly has a lot of experience and knowledge that she doesn't have and were provided with misleading information.
Your comment seems well thought out and thorough; well-said!!👏🏽👏🏽
Great product, poor communication skills regarding the defendants. They seem like nice people, who have maintained success throughout their profession, just did not reach out for clarification purposes. Hope, this a lesson learned.
Good luck to the plaintiff, hope her product was a complete success. As far as the defendants, good luck to them, as well, hope they learned from this experience and continued to thrive by implementing proper communication.
If this product becomes a huge success they will be kicking themselves for not giving her the money back for the fabric and offering to do her first new and improved batch for free. But they seem like they are a successful business and I hope they continue to be successful. Her father getting easily offended might have cost them a huge contract. Women will pay an arm and a leg for really good hair products.
Based on what you're saying they should have followed up before cutting anything. A client will always be happier to clarify than to waste time and money replacing ruined materials.
She asked for a sample before mass production
The plaintiff is super cute! I want a wrap! LOL.
You are pretty 😍 as well 😃
@@davidellis5141 You're kind, but it is all filter. 😅
Just loving how much the Judge respects and is proud of this woman entrepreneur! She’s beaming at her 🥺 amazing
I'm confused. How did the prototype come out perfectly if they didn't understand the pattern? Oh well. Great product. She's going to be so rich. We need to invest.
The prototype came out correctly because she only gave the defendants a piece of fabric large enough to be cut the correct way. They couldn't turn it sideways to cut like how they cut all the other pieces off of the full bolt of fabric.
@@melosidhe779 Got it. Thank you.