“The right continually claims that the press has a liberal bias” Christ, nearly 33 years have gone by and yet we as a society still haven’t learned! You have to hand it to Chomsky. I reckon I’d have given up way before now, but he’s still fighting the good fight. What a guy.
People are still into surface issues and immersed in the bi-party system, with a channel on television for their respective shallow parties, and choosing among demagogues within the two parties and "reporters" with pretty faces to "report" the status of each issue.
Lydia Porter Because there are so few people who are educated enough to recognize what's going on. Even fewer who understands what's going on, and even fewer who cares what's going on.
wow! you could say these exact same things today that he did in 1989!!! we can no longer pretend we don't know anything! it's all right here. and there. and there. and there...
Rudolf Rocker for sure. I discovered Rocker while reading a biography about Chomsky. Rocker wrote an incredible book about the Spanish Civil War with which Chomsky was enamored as a youngster.
its interesting that the position of the elite is that the average person has no ability to assess their own interests. And yet, a large swath of the population seems extremely easy to be convinced of things that clearly are against their interest (case and point, republican voters and liberalizing the economy). its sort of hard to argue for democracy when you observe how easily manipulated people are and how terrible they seem to be in actually recognizing their own interests. US libertarians are another great example. a group thats been convinced that advocating of total private tyranny is the path to ultimate freedom. it is Orwellian in that what they advocate for is the extreme opposite of what they say they want. perhaps the elites are right, or are these people just the result of decades of indoctrination and sophisticated propaganda? if so, why are people like myself and others seemingly immune to this, or am i equally indoctrinated?
+Bernise Anders "A large swath of the population being completely convinced of something that is OPPOSITE of their best interest" because of the same devices Chomsky talks about (i.e. the media). This goes back to Edward Bernays and the birth of public relations. Bernays engineered the idea that women smoking is a method of attaining women's rights. People can be convinced of ideas opposing their interests if their information is controlled the way the media is.
People don't necessarily vote for what is in their own interest. They vote for what they believe to be in the common interest. E.g. What's best for America instead of just what's best for me. But what is in the best interest of a whole nation is much harder to decide than what is merely in your own interest. The republican media never appeals to self-interest, but instead to things like principles, a commitment to the constitution, values like liberty etc. They don't say "vote for this, then you get free stuff".
I don’t think anyone is immune to the propaganda, we’re all susceptible to it but I guess you’re more aware of the trigger points of what to watch out for etc when it comes to what the media conveys. 1 thing very common with right wing voters is their absolute disdain for mainstream media, yet they watch so much of it & all their convos & talking points around politics align almost identically with what the media puts out. They’re brainwashed but they don’t realise it. Their minds are gripped by someone else’s thinking.
@Only Observing There are no _progressive_ politicians in the US. There are far-right (Republicans) and center-right ( Democrats). Bernie Sanders, _the squad_, and Elizabeth Warren are centrist politicians, advocating for policies that exist everywhere in the developed world (Canada, Western Europe, Oceania, developed Asia). From Universal healthcare, free higher education, to a less militarized, business-run economy (half the federal budget goes to defense, wonder who the US is afraid of, and most American corporations funnel their money through tax havens, shell companies, and use other financial instruments to avoid paying taxes)
Does anyone know the name of the book co-authored by Chomsky and Herman that was suppressed by Warner's shuttering of its publishing company? The only books I can find that are co-authored by the two are Manufacturing Consent (which was not the book) and both volumes of The Political Economy of Human Rights (later given the titles The Washington Connection and Third-World Fascism (vol. 1) and After the Cataclysm (vol. 2).
I found my Father’s 🙏🏻, in any case of War’s lasted for the First and the Greatest don’t need it ending with warriors selling 😥, or it’s any reason and good. At Syria 🇸🇾 there is the Armed game on suffering people ☺️. Warriors of democratic leadership in disrupting and dangerous sucking life together prosperity .
This man is an academic. Would you expect him to speak in slang? He’s an elder who is highly respected. It wouldn’t hurt to show some respect for the man. Manners are sorely lacking these days.
@@atomicstyle7344 Hitler was also a "respected elder" in Germany at a certain time, doesn't mean he's deserving of respect. Stop appealing to authority, jackass.
Kudos to you for having a great track record criticizing Chomsky over the years on different videos without any substantial critic, but many superficial insinuations. Must be great to watch CNN NBC etc. and feel well informed
@@NachttiSchlampE65 , LOL IF you had properly grasped of my point, you would realize that because Chomsky himself has ZERO actual Training or Experience or genuine understanding in any field outside Linguistics, the reality is that it is Chomsky himself who lacks any, ' substance ', whatsoever outside that ONE field! Which actually makes my statements about Chomsky better informed than he will ever be! :-D :-D :-D So what about this reality are you having trouble grasping?
I love the way that even when the room is plunged into total darkness Noam just keeps talking without missing a beat.
“The right continually claims that the press has a liberal bias” Christ, nearly 33 years have gone by and yet we as a society still haven’t learned! You have to hand it to Chomsky. I reckon I’d have given up way before now, but he’s still fighting the good fight. What a guy.
This deserves much more then under 9,000 views.
People are still into surface issues and immersed in the bi-party system, with a channel on television for their respective shallow parties, and choosing among demagogues within the two parties and "reporters" with pretty faces to "report" the status of each issue.
Lydia Porter Because there are so few people who are educated enough to recognize what's going on. Even fewer who understands what's going on, and even fewer who cares what's going on.
My thoughts exactly! I noticed that videos that thought-provoking and knowledge worth always have the lesser views!
It's an enlightening talk.
87K now, start sharing on Social Media
"Books don't burn very well - they're kind of like bricks."
Gosh, I love Chomsky.
Burn all the Marxist BOOKS ASAP.
MASS MURDER SEMANTICS AND Economics. CHOMPSKY IS
AN ANGEL OF DEATH. KARL MARX IS HIS GOD THE SUPREME ANARCHIST
I don't think that was metaphorical
wow! you could say these exact same things today that he did in 1989!!! we can no longer pretend we don't know anything! it's all right here. and there. and there. and there...
2024 here. Still true
unbelievable how much actual truth this man is speaking , although this was happening 26 tears ago.. Thanks a mill for the upload!
.
the modfather lol!! Time to wake up now!
Lmao at that guys comment. Even Chomsky videos attract perverts!
26 *tears* ago. exactly right!
It would be good for you if she exploded huh? If she stuck around you'd have to witness her reaction of disgust to your personality.
The best minds are never appreciated, because they are truthful and non commercial. Noam, for sure is one of them.
"It's not that it 'seems' to be inconsistent with 'the spirit of the agreement'-it's *flatly inconsistent* with it's *wording.*"
March 15, 1989 is the date of this talk.
Rudolf Rocker for sure.
I discovered Rocker while reading a biography about Chomsky. Rocker wrote an incredible book about the Spanish Civil War with which Chomsky was enamored as a youngster.
Yes, this is higher quality and can be viewed via the Vimeo channel on Netflix instant view in HD.
Thank you for uploading it.
Dear great prof
Very smart this lecture
🙏🙏🍎🍎🍎🍎🥬🥬🥬🌶️🌶️🌶️🥭🥭🥦🥦🥦🍌🍌🌿🌿🍌🍌🌈🙏
This man is a genius
its interesting that the position of the elite is that the average person has no ability to assess their own interests. And yet, a large swath of the population seems extremely easy to be convinced of things that clearly are against their interest (case and point, republican voters and liberalizing the economy). its sort of hard to argue for democracy when you observe how easily manipulated people are and how terrible they seem to be in actually recognizing their own interests. US libertarians are another great example. a group thats been convinced that advocating of total private tyranny is the path to ultimate freedom. it is Orwellian in that what they advocate for is the extreme opposite of what they say they want. perhaps the elites are right, or are these people just the result of decades of indoctrination and sophisticated propaganda? if so, why are people like myself and others seemingly immune to this, or am i equally indoctrinated?
+Bernise Anders "A large swath of the population being completely convinced of something that is OPPOSITE of their best interest" because of the same devices Chomsky talks about (i.e. the media). This goes back to Edward Bernays and the birth of public relations. Bernays engineered the idea that women smoking is a method of attaining women's rights. People can be convinced of ideas opposing their interests if their information is controlled the way the media is.
People don't necessarily vote for what is in their own interest. They vote for what they believe to be in the common interest. E.g. What's best for America instead of just what's best for me.
But what is in the best interest of a whole nation is much harder to decide than what is merely in your own interest.
The republican media never appeals to self-interest, but instead to things like principles, a commitment to the constitution, values like liberty etc. They don't say "vote for this, then you get free stuff".
I don’t think anyone is immune to the propaganda, we’re all susceptible to it but I guess you’re more aware of the trigger points of what to watch out for etc when it comes to what the media conveys.
1 thing very common with right wing voters is their absolute disdain for mainstream media, yet they watch so much of it & all their convos & talking points around politics align almost identically with what the media puts out. They’re brainwashed but they don’t realise it. Their minds are gripped by someone else’s thinking.
@Only Observing good response
@Only Observing There are no _progressive_ politicians in the US. There are far-right (Republicans) and center-right ( Democrats). Bernie Sanders, _the squad_, and Elizabeth Warren are centrist politicians, advocating for policies that exist everywhere in the developed world (Canada, Western Europe, Oceania, developed Asia). From Universal healthcare, free higher education, to a less militarized, business-run economy (half the federal budget goes to defense, wonder who the US is afraid of, and most American corporations funnel their money through tax havens, shell companies, and use other financial instruments to avoid paying taxes)
great video thank you!
wow i didn't even know i was subscribed to this channel. great upload though, i'll always give chomsky a listen.
Damn, he comes out of the gate with Salman Rushdie. This dude is an OG.
Does anyone know the name of the book co-authored by Chomsky and Herman that was suppressed by Warner's shuttering of its publishing company? The only books I can find that are co-authored by the two are Manufacturing Consent (which was not the book) and both volumes of The Political Economy of Human Rights (later given the titles The Washington Connection and Third-World Fascism (vol. 1) and After the Cataclysm (vol. 2).
Hi idk if you found it in the interim but this is it: Counter-Revolutionary Violence: Bloodbaths in Fact & Propaganda
@@maueflcoach1506 I did not. Thank you!
@44:00
Features of propaganda
1. Advocated by elites- idea that the public is dangerous
2. Prior plausibility- predictability
was ready for Final Fantasy with that piano sting at the start
Great stuff
And on it goes.
"... to create the mis-impression that it is ( Russia ) you are fighting ... "
Kurt ?
If the American top elite had the intelligence of Noam Chomsky , what a better world this would be.
Bakunin - Pannekoek - Luxemburg - Goldman - Chomsky . . . ?
Thank you. What year was this lecture given please?
I found my Father’s 🙏🏻, in any case of War’s lasted for the First and the Greatest don’t need it ending with warriors selling 😥, or it’s any reason and good. At Syria 🇸🇾 there is the Armed game on suffering people ☺️. Warriors of democratic leadership in disrupting and dangerous sucking life together prosperity .
Assange brought me here. Fight the future pedes. P.S. I miss Hitch. Wish he was still around to talk 2016 with Chomsky.
48:58 3. Propaganda model is assumed to be true by majority of the population.
Who is\was Edward Herman ? Why did he stayed in the shadow of Prof. Noam Chomsky ?
You uploaded it again?
17:45 Nose scratch
63 million would be nice
🙏🙏🍊🐧🐧🍌🍅🌿🍦🐠🍍🦜🥒🦈🍒🐓🥭🥭🥬🥬🐓🐬🍓🥦🍃🌶️🍅🍎🍎🍎🍎🍎🙏
how crazy israel propaganda antics had already been discovered by noam chomsky back 1989 😂
Rudolf Rocker
Obligatory comment referencing the faux final fantasy intro.
Rodriguez Larry Taylor Charles Robinson George
Lewis Sandra Perez David Young Kimberly
Sophism lives.
Lmao karma 17:00
Perez Brian Harris Ronald Jackson Jessica
Informative but man talk about blah communication. Sheesh
This man is an academic. Would you expect him to speak in slang? He’s an elder who is highly respected. It wouldn’t hurt to show some respect for the man. Manners are sorely lacking these days.
@@atomicstyle7344 Hitler was also a "respected elder" in Germany at a certain time, doesn't mean he's deserving of respect. Stop appealing to authority, jackass.
Kudos to Chomsky for being able to create the Appearance that his ridiculous paranoid conspiracy theories have any basis in reality! 😀
Kudos to you for having a great track record criticizing Chomsky over the years on different videos without any substantial critic, but many superficial insinuations.
Must be great to watch CNN NBC etc. and feel well informed
@@NachttiSchlampE65 ,
LOL IF you had properly grasped of my point, you would realize that because Chomsky himself has ZERO actual Training or Experience or genuine understanding in any field outside Linguistics, the reality is that it is Chomsky himself who lacks any, ' substance ', whatsoever outside that ONE field!
Which actually makes my statements about Chomsky better informed than he will ever be!
:-D :-D :-D
So what about this reality are you having trouble grasping?
c'est magnifique
🧭