วีดีโอ

can you suggest a list of resources to learn the things as you have? I have a strong basis in programming and an okay understanding of 3d graphics. Any courses or books you would recommend?

Dude, how do you put collision on the streets?

Thanks for the GDExtension series, super helpful

Your channel is filled with very interesting stuff related to Godot. Subbed

We are getting great great grandparents with this one 🫡

As far as I am aware the plan is to replace the godot physics with jolt in the future, which is already shipping as an alternative to godot physics in v4.4

this is amazing!

I've been coding for the last 15 years. Never in my life have I faced something as challenging as shader coding. Thanks for the video, I don't think I'll remember anything but thanks for the effort :)

Amazing and straightforward, Thanks a lot!

when i run the scene terrain disappear.

Broke in multiplayer This is so sad Just PIZDECH how sad No terrain addon wich normal support multiplayer (at least it just wouldn’t break on it) it's just a curse

if you have free time would you mind make a video about adding caves and floating islands

🔥🔥

remapping shortcuts is very useful

amazing video again, I learn an enormous amount in ever single thing you make. Please keep creating. Is there any way I can make a donation or contribution?

How to create heightmap terrain with collision in Godot 4 : Step 1 - "Open blender" Refuses to elaborate further

this was an absolutely wonderful video. I knew nothing about triplanar mapping, and now I feel like I can go in Godot and experiment with it.

Nice train

is it ok for making low poly terrain

There is an open proposal on github named "Use SIMD vectorization intrinsics in the core" and an open pull request named "Add SIMD option to compile system and implement SIMD for vector4".

Did I get here late, or I am doing something wrong with MTerrain🥲

thanks, good tutorial how can i use the same mask for the snow but in vertex to scale up only the masked verts like displacement of sorts.

Can you make a game performance video? Your fps is incredible, of course you may have a beautiful machine, but it's clear that you have great knowledge about performance.

This is incredible! I have been trying to do just this for days. Thank you <3

Thanks for not making a clickbait video title and yet still making people wonder

I think it is more likely an issue of who will maintain this? Even in this video you encounter problems with the basis. This problem will affect the rest of the codebase then only people who can contribute/maintain would be programmers who live closer to the metal than your average programmer. I like low-level programming, and it hurts me to say that their policy on code simplicity sounds the right choice as a company. Maybe we can get best of both worlds in the future.

kinda sad we can't use sampler2D or array as per-instance uniform... chunked implementation of this inevitably requires mesh generation

You can check on Godbolt that pretty much every compiler automatically applies SIMD optimization to most trivial math. They are becoming so good at it that some people are advocating against writing SIMD by hand and just letting the compiler do its thing. The real reason it's usually not done is backwards compat. Even upgrading to AVX is so controversial because of users with old CPUs that its just not worth it. To properly make use of SIMD, you can't get around dynamic dispatch. If Jolt is fast, this is probably what they're doing. But it's also a lot more work.

Ngl you should work with the Team of Redot, as it's going to be more likely to be implemented overthere instead

حاجی ای کاش فارسیشم مییزاشتی 🤧

The Godot team refusing to add SIMD and insisting the the complier can do it truly show that none of them worked in the AAA games industry

The BEST. If not the BEAST.

Why is the engine working on such a low level instead of just talking to abstraction layers and letting it pick automatically whatever approach the hardware it is running on does better?

mohsen it would be amazing if you would make another godot project with real actual features build in. Some already tried based on ideological misalignments but their repos are weak. you on the other hand could come up with actual features and others WILL follow!

Support different CPU architectures, operate systems and graph APIs are core work of middle layers, third party libraries can do other, or need game developer implement by themself with some specific requires. Godot does perfect encapsulation in high level, but have some problems in low level, its codebase is not as solid and mature as some famous framework like SDL, Thats limits its ceiling.

I think they should add you to Godot.

These are the types of videos that I love to watch, you have gained a subscriber. Thanks for sharing this video, it is appreciated.

every time that I think you can't surprise me anymore you outdo yourself! Awesome, you're wonderful and I wish your videos were appreciated even more 👌👌👌

Does Jolt supports SIMD? Jolt right now pretends to Godot's default physics's place. So why GodotPhysics even need a SIMD? Why waste effort on Godot Physics, when Jolt already surpasses it? Also as far as I know, physics's contributor left the Godot team, leaving GodotPhysics in a suspended state.

A ~300% improvement on physics performance would be absolutely insane. Please consider submitting your implementation to the Redot team!

TIL what SSE and AVX are.

Not only physics is slow. Skeletal animations, scenegraph itself, rendering, resolution scaling... When all of these will be fixed, I doubt it'll be Godot.

As an artist does some coding I'm thankful for the sight into the inner workings of Godot. I'm really surprised that Godot doesn't support such an old instruction set. I remember build PCs over a decade ago and had to make sure the the CPUs I used had certain features like this because the games and software I use required them. I can see why it can be frustrating to many Godot users. Many of us choose Godot because of it's open source nature but it still feels like it's being held back due to issues like this that honestly shouldn't be.

Afaik, GODOT is (hopefully) gonna be using Jolt by default in the future for physics! (See GODOT issue 7308) But hopefully these changes can be implemented in the other parts of the engine! I'm also curios about the Rapier Physics Engine. It supports 2D physics too, which would be amazing if that could be improved too with it! Edit: There is an interesting topic around XPBD in a Reddit post I found by looking up "Jolt vs Rapier GODOT". That could be interesting to delve deeper into!

cool video, let's hope Godot foundation fixes their physics, I mean come on, $100k a month in donations (estimation because we don't see one-time donations on the site), and they can't fix such a crucial part of the engine.

Rapier also supports simd for 2D and 3D

do you think that the godot team will add this in the future ?

Have you opened a GitHub issue on the Godot proposals for SIMD optimization if there doesn't already exist one? This would probably yield the most results and chances for a change.

Ah, as a Unity user watching this I'm thinking, this is why the burst compiler exists. I believe its important for godot to have something like the burst compiler for their engine, or at least some form of vectorisation because the performance benefits are quite literally 10x.

Complex! Thanks for sharing!