วีดีโอ

you forgot about redox os. based on rust, could be the future actually...

Freebsd is the only realistic alternative to linux. It also has the potential to come much closer to linux in terms of features, but there just aren't enough developers that want to work on it. Its license doesn't do it any good either. It would have to change to gplv2 for it ever significantly improve.

do you happen to be finnish?

Besides it's not like you have to constantly add new features to a kernel, talking about the Hurd. When it's out it's out. It gets the features it needs and that's what it has, then it's just maintenance from there, on top of bringing in all the drivers and such of course. So the slow speed of the development of Hurd is not important, once it's ready it's ready. it's called being feature complete. Sure over time it could be extended or whatever but that's not inherently necessary

Interesting, I didn't know about Retroshare. I love the fact that it seems to include all kinds of content: messaging, forums, video, calls, etc. on one platform. I think it seems a bit too technical for the average user, and it doesn't seem to support the Fediverse. Currently, I'm switching over to Mastodon, Pixelfed and eventually PeerTube, but those are all different platforms. It's easy to understand that Mastodon is a replacement for Twitter. Mastodon is a big one right now. Has lots of users. Pixelfed is a replacement for Instagram, but still very new and small. PeerTube is a replacement for TH-cam, but even smaller. But the main problem is that these are all different platforms to use. It would be best to have everything in one place. Like Retroshare.

Tbh I don't think the solution is to go full microkernel as much as it isn't to go full monolithic

Opus for the win

I am actually somewhat surprised just how well the Speex codec performs. Depending on prefrence it even sounds better than Vorbis. Despite only meant for encoding speech, it encodes music better than vorbis does, fascinating.

More on Init Freedom: www.devuan.org/os/init-freedom

This recommendations list is not meant to be a thorough detailed review of the distributions I recommend, rather it's my suggestion for a starting point for *you* to go look into off of, dear viewer. So I am here to point you into the correct direction so you can go make your own research, that's the role this recommendations list serves.

I don't recommend the use of Nobara in general which I mentioned along with Fedora, as a modified Fedora variant that can also be used. Nobara should be used only if you specifically need some of those features and Nobara offers over Fedora. Only if you specifically have such a reason to use it. Otherwise just use Fedora it's the better one for most users.

Why hate SystemD?

These are the top 3 best GNU+Linux distros out there. (not couting the bonus ones).

What's wrong with the TH-cam algorithm this time, this speech is getting this many views meanwhile there are lots of better speeches on my channel which don't get much attention. Please viewer, go see the other speeches also.

You want the product of the software developers labor without having to pay the software developer. You want them to do work for you without you having to pay them. This is the mindset of the slaveholder. That is the philosophical background of what you're talking about.

I like the way you think. Consider writing a script/transcript next time, and reading off of that. You will get your points across more clearly and quickly, and you will have to do less editing, as well!

Also I didn't even mention the Unity desktop environment which is also a fork of GNOME 3

There is no way the average person cares about desktop environments. I would say the number one practical reason is that when you buy software the company you bought it from now has an incentive to control you to try to get more money out of you, so you end up paying to only get worse software with intentional holes in it, and often those holes very carefully have no work arounds. So when you use unfree software you are paying to have worse software that doesn't work for you, but instead for the company. You are buying anti-features. That your OS expires and it forces you to transfer to a subscription based OS. That's an anti-feature. When a phone prevents you from adding additional people to a conversation if even one person in the conversation is on the wrong platform, that is an anti-feature and that is the development your money went toward. When you can't turn your data plan into a hot spot without paying extra on your $70/mo Verizon plan but I can on my $10/mo plan with some obscure t-mobile reseller, the $60/mo difference went toward buying anti-features. Everything you pay for these days has extra engineering to make it a minimal product.

I would have made the video around the same time as I made this other one: th-cam.com/video/SF1VONlfET0/w-d-xo.html

Lol I love how you get close to batman 😂😂😂😂

You make a number of curious points. But, no. No company is going to install I2P by default. It would undermine the data collection they do by default. Privacy is a hard thing to come by these days. You have to work at it.

can you do one with engines? thanks!

Hyperbola will be rebasing their system off of a *BSD system to become another *BSD system. Hyperbola will be the first truly free/libre *BSD system, absolutely no proprietary software, 100% libre. I will most likely take a look at it again then.

dudeeee, thanks for the information, there really should be a campaign running just for ip to get preinstalled, this could prevent so many attackers from attacking the attack surfaces of a network, its like finding a door lock in an dark room with no lights, where you have like 40 or doors but only 1 has lock. Very informative video

i had an lowend pc positivo zx3020 w/ 1gb ram and cannot be expand.... xfce is working great but i dont like it so much.... your test with cinammon seems a bit better(±40mb) ... i think i'll try it

He has a good point about the house analogy. Why have the basement to your own house locked, and the only way to get in the basement would be to talk to the developer of the house? Stupid…almost communistic. Even though I have a iPhone 12 which is proprietary software, I can also respect the free software movement as well. PS…1:07…wouldn’t he disagree with this since it was on a Mac, which is proprietary?

All kinds of service vehicles are a good example of what I approve of.

Somewhat close equivalents in concept to each of the three categories of laws are the following Creative Commons licenses: Category 1 CC-BY-NC Category 2 CC-BY-NC-ND or CC-BY-ND - depending on whether monetary use is allowed for works under category 2 law Category 3 CC-BY-SA

Go listen to Richard Stallman explaining software freedom here: th-cam.com/channels/9iZ-y4p_TF75BzZ162oDkQ.html

I actually did a really good explanation of software freedom in this speech at 40:06 Comparing software as a tool, to a physical tool. If you don't know what software freedom is, this part of the speech is a good introduction if you want to hear me explaining it. I would also recommend listening to Richard Stallman explain software freedom if you are new to this.

I think copyright is moral in principle. Also, without it, we probably wouldn't have had Unix to begin with. That said, the current copyright duration is ridiculous. Giving a 10 year copyright on software would be enough for people to make money, and if they want to keep updating it with newer versions, they'll still have 10 years on each of those, so people who want an up to date version will mostly pay for it. Also, I think it would be good to have some organisation which could verify and then hold source code, and working compilation instructions, for the 10-year copyright duration, and then release it once the copyright has expired.

They do not care. Their goals and ideals are different. They would only know about it once it is bad enough in the proprietary software world, such that their goals and ideals would not be met in the proprietary world and only in the free software world.

Recommend investigating possible parallels with current efforts in video game preservation, this will need to become politically relevant. I hope for just the right magnitude of transgression against consumers in a broad market to catalyse public interest. Persons on the inside of the private sector can encourage corperate policies to act greedily enough to work against their own interests. Use current incentive structures to manifest backlash. Streaming services which offer "purchases" overtop subscriptions (or the inverse) might be the best vector for broadest impact. Outside of "4d corporate espoinage", forming broader alliances, making certain realistic concessions & condensing your views to actionable objectives might be a good place to start outside of these sorts of videos, which may themselves constitute praxis. One highly effective social media campaign I've seen lately was the #occultea inquiry about online occult influencer/community ethics. You could study this & learn from their success in turning the snowball down the mountain.

this version of the speech is infinitely better than the original, don't bother with the originial version of useless ramblings, anything I said there I said better in this one.

16:00 the microphone seems to have picked up some mobile telephone network signal

sand

Sorry gang I was mistaken when I said that CD s are not good enough quality, that there should be some mainstream 96khz 24bit format, that is as it turns out totally unnecessary. I know there is a controvercy regarding the need for higher samplerates and bit-depth, but I am convinced that the higher numbers are not necessary, what I said was based on ignorance. So CD quality it is then. We need to get back to CD quality, because lossy encoding is really bad. CD is as high as it needs to be to reach the limits of human hearing capabilities. 44.1khz 16bit "CD quality" is good.

Thanks for the video. dmesg gives me the following in GhostBSD (FreeBSD) 14: > dmesg cd0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 scbus7 target 0 lun 0 cd0: <Slimtype eBAU108 7 L YL0M> Removable CD-ROM SCSI device cd0: 40.000MB/s transfers However, cat gives me the following: > cat /dev/cd0 > heart_like_a_wheel.iso cat: /dev/cd0: Invalid argument > cat /dev/cd0 > heart_like_a_wheel.img cat: /dev/cd0: Invalid argument In Debian 12, I get: $ cat /dev/sr0 > heart_like_a_wheel.iso cat: /dev/sr0: Input/output error and $ cat /dev/sr0 > heart_like_a_wheel.img cat: /dev/sr0: Input/output error This is an audio CD...

yes and thats a good thing.

One can only wonder as to why did this upload suddenly get over 100 views when the 2 previous videos on the topic got only a few.

Good helpful 😊😊

Not about elitism. When I built my current ATX tower, I used the then newest version of Core i5 CPU with the latest generation of Intel GPU built in. Debian Stable won't support the graphics of such a machine until the next version to come out after those processors have been replaced in the market by something newer that the new DS won't support. Meanwhile, the rolling release means that Arch supported it just as soon as I could put the machine together and install it. In my emergency/roadtrip laptop I run Debian Stable because I don't always remember to update it every couple of weeks like I should and DS is the distro most forgiving of that. Never had any luck installing Debian with the /home folder on a separate partition, because the way Debian's partition editor works, one has to set up the "home" partition before the mount point it needs exists, causing it to fail. Meanwhile, that manual command line install in Arch makes it pretty simple to figure out not only that, but how to expand on that and make my own unconventional partitioning setup which I maintain has performance advantages, but is only doable on a single-user computer. That's the beauty of Linux. There's always room for you to do you.

Maybe the first dozen or so minutes are not that bad, but don't bother going past that unless you just happen to be in the mood for a bunch of random ramblings. This one is a really bad speech after a certain point.

I understand that proprietary softwares limit the user's freedom but I don't think all licenses are evil and unjust. For example, I think Steam (Valve), Affinity (Serif) and Davinci Resolve create great products and softwares even if they are proprietary. But softwares like Adobe are known to have bad unjust practices and probably fall into the evil category. Proprietary softwares are also usually better than free softwares because they have financial ressources to develop and maintain softwares. From a business perspective, it makes sense to make money even at the cost of loss of a bit of freedom. Heck, even Ubuntu that promotes FOSS tends to make mistakes and lose its user's trust. I think giving away your freedom to a society that you actually trust and have good records is perfectly fine. You might need to make proper research to make enligthened decisions. But you should always keep in mind that walking away from a society is always a valid option if the proprietor breaks boundaries. Untimately, it depends what you values and what you're willing to tolerate or not. Personally, I currently use a mix of both.

Absolutely not. I just love Arch for the fact that I know what is going into my OS. Elitist are a joke and seriously nobody likes them. They are anti Linux and anti open source if they think that way. Also I use Arch so I can make the joke.... I use Arch BTW. Haha, no but seriously I use Arch btw.

0:00 with ever increasing digitization of society no. hightech has no future

Tämäki jo 2 vuotta sitte. Jaiks

Retroshare should come preinstalled on GNU+Linux operating system distributions

Neurodivergent people tend to be disliked. Stallman is a genius, but also he's obviously on the spectrum and not functional socially.

got little bit long outro here