วีดีโอ

Great job in showing this. 100% true and hopefully DCS gets its act together and actually does something about it.

This is so awesome! This must be what flights sim were like for my grandpa. J/K been playing flight sims since c64 days I am that guy. Love it!

Cant expect muich from Russians. They do this for money, not for passion. Iv noticed that Americans have a mindset where they lie about doing it for money, to justify their passion

i’m honestly not surprised by this in the slightest, dcs is (at least in my opinion and experience) infinitely better than BMS in multiplayer than single player. BMS is incredibly good tho.

After the fiasco with Razbam, I’ve complete lost faith in DCS and its devs.

I didn't play the original Falcon 4.0, but I spent a lot of time in Allied force. I studied the manual for months, overcoming the language barrier and the difficulty of understanding things, I watched Pete Bonanni's video tutorials to understand how to fight migs, and gathered my strength to test myself in a fight with migs or su. Each fight was like a dance with death, and I was doing my best to avoid being left in the crosshairs, let alone win the fight. And when I managed to shoot down a mig, it was a real celebration, I almost never enjoyed the game as much as I did at such moments. And when I was ready for the campaign, I never got into a dogfight, not even with the 29, let alone the 21, the falcon's AI taught me an important lesson, you better not mess with it, otherwise you will understand why NATO respected the 29 and how you should handle these guys in the air, otherwise you will get a nice opportunity to eject from your sockeye in the DPRK. Remembering this experience and playing DCS, the artificial intelligence there is just a joke

I have to say this. You are a terrible shot. I find it difficult to credit you when you are stacking the fights in your favor to start with and still wiffed hard and also when have zero skill to back anything you say. Look I know this is harsh but it is true. This is not here to insult you but to be brutally blunt and unfiltered because you will only have yourself to blame when you reach your imminently guaranteed failure at this rate. Unless you get real you will fail and that will be better than letting you spread misinformation in the capacity that you faked the entire experiment out of your own greed. Honestly you could say you just did not know but that is your own fault. It is up to you to do your research and learn for yourself how to do it rightly. If you want to do a video like this then you need to play it fair or against yourself to PROVE yourself right. Anyone who is remotely familiar noticed instantly that you had the DCS AI at THE LOWEST pilot rating and made it fly a worse plane than yours by a lot. Really dude? A MiG 23 vs a F16 and you still can't hit your shots? Bro... You doctored the entire experiment into your favor. Yes. The AI in DCS are absolute garbage. We already knew that and we always have. We also know that with as awful as you flew you would have been MELTED into slag by the DCS AI the moment you bumped up their rating. I know I do or did lose a lot to the highest AI pilot ratings for a while because I am not too bitch to keep it real kid. Rewatcing some of the video I noticed that the DCS AI never shot at you once. That is only possible when you set them that way in settings or by removing all of their munitions. YOU DISARMED THE AI AND SET THEM ON THE LOWEST DIFFICULTY RATING. Really? How obvious did you plan to make this. Is this for late April Fools? You also screw up when you decided to use another game to prove a point only in DCS. This video is fraudulent to say the least. If you want to actually seem like you know what you are doing then start by bumping up that rating. DCS AI play passively at low ratings and more aggressive at higher ratings. Then you set up the AI exactly as you set yourself up with the same everything or better then you fight. Use only guns until you get hits then you use missiles or no missiles at all. Actually where you should start is LEARNING HOW TO PROPERLY DUEL because you are just a bumbling fool otherwise. This is harsh but you are a lying fake starting drama on something old news that everyone already knows about and are pissed about for years past now. You also have no idea what you are doing and it is obvious. Again I say this; "Honestly you could say you just did not know but that is your own fault. It is up to you to do your research and learn for yourself how to do it rightly." It is the truth that you fucked up and you have no excuse so redo the experiment and upload your findings with JUST DCS because the focus is JUST DCS and the games are different in every way and not comparable. They run on different engines FFS.

Ah, yes. I forgot that there's a wholly cheaper, much more rich and full, equally if not moreso capable combat flight sim available. Thank you for this video popping up in my recommendations to remind me that Falcon 4.0 exists.

DCS AI does need a lot of work, look at the size of those pixels in Falcon 4.0 though. All I can say is DCS has superior clouds.

haven't got into Jane's because too arcadee... THUMBS DOWN omg FFS not gonna watch this guy's opinions! JANE'S USAF and IAF was so good.. then Super Pro 9 and Gulf Knight's mods furthering. Why are you even talking about how hard 90s games are to run in these days.. that affects the tier list?? really? Grab your old PII computer and install the CDs.

듣고 있자니..어릴적 생각에 마냥 눈물이 난다..

ive beat it with flightgear

Oh my guy you NEED to play Jane's F-15 Strike Eagle. It is the best by far, having played most on your list. From the menus, to the game modes, to the campaigns, to the vibes. Everything felt so great and it looks like magic to be a game from the 90s. I remember spending nights playing this just listening to the many radio calls and just looking at the empty void, with just my cockpit screens to look at. Wonderful experience, really should look up. Way better than USAF and Hornet. Other game that I love, but I don't know if you include helis, is Commanche vs Hokum, since it has an entirely simulated war behind the excellent chopper models, quite easy to play too.

why the add are awesome? like can't we get the add like for plane module? theyd be perfect on my wall too

5:09 uhhh... okay

lmao nice video who know the dev might see it and modifie the IA yet the game seem to promote multiplayer might be one of the reason IA is dumb

Why not just play other real people?

1991 does not feel like 33 years ago…

DCS ai I believe is based on similar algorytm as IL2 1946 was. Enemies are dumb. But their jets have unlimited amount of flares and engines produce thrust comparable with Millenium Falcon only lol

I still like and have fun with DCS Not sure why falcan fans seeth and mald at people enjoying DCS

Falcon BMS for life.

Man I just wanted a comprehensive guide on how to setup TAW to run on my laptop and setup my stick and all that.

Crashes in DCS happen very often. AI is weird. Once wjen flying on F-15C I fought MiG-21 on Rookie and ... I lost. After more than 10 minute fight I lost too much speed, too much altitude and got hit by R-60... Some other I fought F-16 while flying on MiG-15 and I won. 😅

I haven't seen the dcs ai act that brain dead before

lol, the Joint Strike Fighter menu pic looks like all the concept renders of the NGAD

DCS is a 25 year old sim lol. It's heritage is very much Flanker which came from the 90's - and it shows. DCS focused on looking pretty - charging for modules - and ignored the core game.

DCS is quickly becoming ARMA 3. Flood of content with no solid core. The core vs modules manhours should be 10:1 on ED's part considering now it's 3rd parties doing much of the content.

LOL, the washed out Caucasus doesn't look much better either :)

I'm curious, how did you set up the AI in the DCS mission editor?

I think ED doesnt prioritize AI because people mainly play MP PvP and use singleplayer for target practice and learning new aircraft. I still think they should update the AI (my potato canot handle MP)

What AI

Sims didn't die, the sim craze moved from the West to the East. Lock On and IL-2 Sturmovik both released in the early 2000s, with Lock On being a sequel to 90s Flanker (which I wish you've included)

I would just like to point out that Microprose is back and is making flight sims again.

A few of points about JSF. The entire globe was modeled. There was a cheat that would allow you to fly any aircraft in the game. You could control your pilot after ejection and he had a pistol.

Jane's F-15 was excellent, should've been included

I’m pretty sure those ai weren’t on ace. Js I mean I’m with you bms is def better but that wasn’t a fair comparison

Meanwhile on the physics end, and AI MIG-15s are still UFO's breaking the laws of physics, pulling 10g dives and climbs with a thrust-to-weight ratio of 5.5 or whatever. AI is flying around ACE combat planes and it makes the game unplayable for me, and I don't really want to dive into multiplayer or anything non-coop and right now I only have the f-86 to play on really.

so this comment section is the cave of dcs haters?

im a literal noob. the ai in the game was noticeably bad from the first week of playing. but i will say the ai ive seen have been better than what you showed in dogfights at least not by much. a brand new player shouldnt be able to win a dogfight against max level ai consistently

dcs is definitely pvp

In all fairness, DCS is pretty much a game where the multiplayer experience is the reason to play

Yo, I have a copy of the Eurofigther 2000 game. My dad gave it to me. To bad its to old to run on my Windows 11 :(

Who eles is excited for bms 4.38?

Apart from being the premier sim from the 90s Falcon 4 had an interesting turn of events, after a number of years Microprose stated they would not support any more updates for their sim, the community asked for the game code to carry on the work themselves but Microprose refused, a short time later the code mysteriously ended up being leaked to the internet. The sim went from strength to strength and is now called BMS

BMS might have some nice mechanics but dude, the graphics are 20 years old, the thing looks like trash. It's like digging out adventures from the 80s, they were really great but nothing for 2024 anymore

а это какой уровень врагов? раньше в горячих скалах и дкс была возможность выставлять уровень навыков ботов.

still waiting for that modern flight sim that matches the mission editors and ai from 2 decades ago. something like Falcon BMS + Il2 1946 + DI tornado. Also would need a proper flanker sim; my favorite jet

Dude it’s because they heavily rely on the multiplayer experience even though 80% or so of their customers play only single player. I was heavily involved in DCS from the time it was lock on. My channel reflects that. A buddy of mine flies 35a and opened my eyes big time to how bs DCS is and we rather play shit thunder over it. Also, it’s become rather apparent that they only developed US jets in full fidelity… I wonder why.. (I don’t buy into that bs about why they can’t develope Russian jets narrative)

Also, in BVR, they know exactly who has been targeted if in a flight oof +1

DCS AI is closer to a drone practice target than a real enemy pilot simulation. Solo player is so side lined by ED dynamics that i doubt we will ever see anything decent from their AI